The Boston Bombing was an elaborately staged theatrical event.

[Snoweagle]

Apparently, the alternative media is being ignored again with regard the events of The Boston Bombing which now is conducting the sham trial which will seriously impact the liberties of the American people. This is an amazing summary. Apparently the Defense Council of the trial has ignored these findings, so maybe they too have been "leaned" upon.

Jim Fetzer of VeteransToday put out another masterpiece of an article that completely destroys the fairy tale of the Boston Bombing. I’m urging that patriots worldwide spread this article and video worldwide to wake up humanity.

The Real Deal with Jim Fetter – MUST SEE Boston Bombing Update! The 12 Exhibits That Prove it was a hoax!

Glen Canady - Veterans Today


You Tube link, well worth viewing and share, go viral:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMxhdiBrqTM#t=2263

The full article can be found here:
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative...t-3122510.html

[grannyfranny100]

I guess that people don't want to pay attention to these false flag operations as long as it doesn't directly effect them. Too bad they don't want to consider the long term implications...

[Sunny-side-up]

Posted by grannyfranny100 (here)
I guess that people don't want to pay attention to these false flag operations as long as it doesn't directly effect them. Too bad they don't want to consider the long term implications...

Yes, sorry to say but, Sheeple are closely related to 'Lemming's!

[Cidersomerset]

I just posted this in depth article on Jackovesks intelligence thread
lots of photos on the link........

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/03...-fit-in-print/

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The New York Times: All the lies they can fit in print

Monday 16th March 2015 at 07:53 By David Icke







New York Times: All the lies they can fit in print


Posted by Jim Fetzer on March 14, 2015

Their Boston trial coverage demonstrates conclusively that even our nation's newspaper of record is corrupt to the core





Tamerlan before and after

by Jim Fetzer

How many lies of enormous magnitude are the American people expected to accept from their
government and the mass media, when it fuctions on its behalf? William Colby, former Director
of the CIA, observed that “The agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media”,
which Carl Bernstein had previously confirmed in his article, “The CIA and the Media” (Rolling
Stone, 20 October 1977), in which agency officials boasted that their greatest successes had
been with CBS, with Time Inc. and with The New York Times:


Among the executives who lent their cooperation to the Agency were William Paley of the Columbia
Broadcasting System, Henry Luce of Time Inc., Arthur Hays Sulzberger of the New York Times,
Barry Bingham Sr. of the Louisville Courier-Journal and James Copley of the Copley News Service.
Other organizations which cooperated with the CIA include the American Broadcasting Company,
the National Broadcasting Company, the Associated Press, United Press International, Reuters,
Hearst Newspapers, Scripps-Howard, Newsweek magazine, the Mutual Broadcasting System, The
Miami Herald, and the old Saturday Evening Post and New York Herald-Tribune. By far the most
valuable of these associations, according to CIA officials, have been with The New York Times,
CBS, and Time Inc.

Judging from its recent coverage of the Boston bombing trial, which The New York Times pretends
is a legitimate judicial procedure based upon authentic evidence, nothing seems to have changed.
The evidence in this case for concluding that this was a drill using amputee actors and special effects
filming is overwhelming, where neither Tamerlan nor Dzhokhar Tsarnaev were responsible for the
explosions or events thereafter. The Times insults our intelligence. How, for example, could Dzhokhar
have run over his brother after Tamerlan had been arrested by the police?

The faulty analogy

Consider, for another, Katharine Q. Seelye, “Defense in Marathon Bombing has Echo of Clarence Darrow”
(The New York Times, 13 March 2015), in which she invokes an absurd comparison of Judy Clarke’s
admission in her opening statement that “He did it!” to Darrow’s defense of Leopold and Loeb, where
Darrpw spent 12 hours of emotion-laden appeals to convince the jury to spare their lives and sentence
them to life in prison rather than to impose the death penalty. Seelye, alas, overlooks the obvious:
Leopold and Loeb were guilty, while her client, Dzhokhar Tsarnaov, is innocent.


Read more: The New York Times: All the lies they can fit in print

A comprehensive article with much more on link below....


Boston Bombing THIS IS A DRILL Announcement Heard Live

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=PaWCumjviWg

Published on 1 Feb 2014


A bystander catches the Boston Marathon This is a drill" announcement live. And a lot more....



http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/03...-fit-in-print/

[thepainterdoug]

cider, great catch and i totally agree. i follow jim fetzer and don't know anyone who puts more intensity into his investigations. he reminds us all on how seductive it is to fall asleep and not question the things we know don't add up.

[Hervé]

As far as I am concerned, I am not impressed with Jim Fetzer, at all:

Boston marathon bombings (was: Explosions at Boston marathon)

[Snoweagle]

Posted by Hervé (here)
As far as I am concerned, I am not impressed with Jim Fetzer, at all:

Boston marathon bombings (was: Explosions at Boston marathon)

Thank you for the link to other Avalon threads covering this issue.

Whether you condone or otherwise the orator is your choice, happy that you have an opinion in that respect.

However, this has nothing to do with the orator(s) reviewing the facts around the event itself, so with due respect, your opinion is off topic and charges the potential discussion here with attacking the individual rather than focussing on alternative evidences shown to be relevant on this matter.

Now the thread has two sources to refer, a timeline is now evident to the creeping disclosure the alternative media is able to bring to the falsification of main stream preferred disclosure. Just as with other "false flag" activities, the actual truth came later as the crisis underwent popular scrutiny and investigation around the events that took place. It is this manner of our congress together to discuss these openly that is our right and our rite to review.

[Hervé]

Posted by Snoweagle (here)
[...]
However, this has nothing to do with the orator(s) reviewing the facts around the event itself...

[...]

Since the "orator" is not reviewing "facts" but, mostly, the planted interpretations of a psy-op. my opinion ain't off topic since I am far from impressed with Jim Fetzer's choice of "facts." (c.f. the thread I posted a link to).

[Snoweagle]

Posted by Hervé (here)

Posted by Snoweagle (here)
[...]
However, this has nothing to do with the orator(s) reviewing the facts around the event itself...
[...]

Since the "orator" is not reviewing "facts" but, mostly, the planted interpretations of a psy-op. my opinion ain't off topic since I am far from impressed with Jim Fetzer's choice of "facts." (c.f. the thread I posted a link to).

Planted Interpretations! you're kidding me - not that I believe it so but that you would twist observable facts into some sort of imaginary conspirator twaddle.

Thank you for the link - No I will not be reading them at this time - You do us a disservice by posting a link without a summary of the 52 pages - yes, 52 pages - of your own interpretations driving your opinion throughout - am glad we share opinions here - as my opinion is this is great evidences to a crime against nationhood.

Returning to planted interpretations, has to be the dumbest dissassociator of scrutiny I have yet heard. We are consumed by seeking facts, it doesn't matter where they come from, we will each decide for ourselves without bullying or badgering from forum criers or MSM.

IMO this was another grandiose false flag, a hardened conspiracy to force changes through legislation to enforce the changing of the Constitution of the US. People should be standing against a wall for this and you bark on "planted interpretations" - wtf - who do you speak for?

This thread highlighted the fact that the court case was being heard withpout these evidences being considered during the trial. This is real evidence. This is not planted interpretations or imaginary planted interpretations or any other valueless twist you might try to squeeze from the events thaat took place that day.

Am quite unsure whether we are at discord in our agreement, as I am unsure which side of the line you might herald your piece from.

[Hervé]

To be clear, here is an unequivocal example of what I call "planted interpretation": Mushroom Cloud Imaged By India’s Mars Orbiter Confirms Huge Explosion On Mars [bogus interpretation]

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Hervé (here)
To be clear, here is an unequivocal example of what I call "planted interpretation": Mushroom Cloud Imaged By India’s Mars Orbiter Confirms Huge Explosion On Mars [bogus interpretation]

Hervé - this is off topic. Mars is a long distance from Boston.

Also, I too will not be reading the 52 page thread you linked to, without providing us with any coherent focus on specific evidence or analysis therein.

In the opening posts of this thread, I saw purported facts, of announcements of a drill over the PA system and in tweets prior to the event. If these purported facts are true, and I suspect they are, then they constitute more evidence that the Boston Bombing Was a Hoax, which is the topic of this thread.

(as in "focus", rather than de-focusing, first on some other 52 page without specifics, then if that doesn't work, on Martian explosions.)

[MorningFox]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by Hervé (here)
To be clear, here is an unequivocal example of what I call "planted interpretation": Mushroom Cloud Imaged By India’s Mars Orbiter Confirms Huge Explosion On Mars [bogus interpretation]

Hervé - this is off topic. Mars is a long distance from Boston.

That's hardly fair and seems a little Orwellian. Why such unnecessary strictness? It's on topic in as much as he is giving an example of "planted interpretation", which is very much a part of this discussion and therefore this topic..

[Hervé]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by Hervé (here)
To be clear, here is an unequivocal example of what I call "planted interpretation": Mushroom Cloud Imaged By India’s Mars Orbiter Confirms Huge Explosion On Mars [bogus interpretation]

Hervé - this is off topic. Mars is a long distance from Boston.

This was given as an "unequivocal" example of a a "planted interpretation" (front-loading if you will) such as "fake, Hollywood-blood" on the sidewalk... until a sample is provided with analysis, that's a planted interpretation which casts doubt on it being actual blood.

... announcements of a drill over the PA system and in tweets prior to the event. If these purported facts are true, and I suspect they are, then they constitute more evidence that the Boston Bombing Was a Hoax, which is the topic of this thread.
[...]

PA announcement of "This is a drill" doesn't make it a "hoax" it only makes it a "False Flag" in which the distinction between actual casualties and drill portions have been deliberately confused.

Indeed there is a 52 page thread about this very problem and I am not interested in repeating it here or anywhere else. All I can say is that all the available evidence and various interpretations have been collected there, to peruse, for anyone interested in really digging the issue.

A False Flag, yes! A complete hoax, no! That's my opinion.

[Snoweagle]

Am happy that we both agree that it was a false flag.

Your opinion prevents you from accepting it was a hoax as well and this surprises me as the word "hoax" is derived from the French "hocus". Furthermore the definition of "hoax" purports to describe between persons a "mischievous deception" which you allude the orator of the OP was guilty of conveying to the reader.

hoax, v.t., & n. 1. Deceive, take in, (person) by way of joke. 2. n. Humorous or mischievous deception. [c. 1800, app. contr. f. HOCUS]
Oxford Concise Dictionary circa. 1964 first printing 1911

As for "planted interpretation", is a fallacy to confuse and distract the understanding of the listener or reader, a deliberate attempt to obfuscate fact from fiction to prevent others engaging in dialogue.
The term "planted interpretation" is better served by the English word "mislead" in it's various connotations of general and professional usage.

The same applies to consideration that, your deviance of usage of standard English terms, should be accepted as having some sort of seniority or authority over general use terms I describe here, is another example of mischievous deception, indeed a hoax of itself. (Yeah, I know doesn't get any better than that does it roflmao).

So which side are you batting for?

When I had read the Jim Fetter article I was gob smacked that we were watching the same old thing again and felt I was duty bound to bring that here to Avalon and really did not expect to find in our ranks, one of our strongest and most articulate posters, apparently working for the same team running the prosecutions of the innocent man in the dock in Boston. I now quite understand your reservations.

Yes indeed, divide and conquer takes many forms:-)

[ThePythonicCow]

Thanks in good part to my own indiscretions, this thread continued to drift off the (important) material it started with, more evidence that the Boston Bombing was an elaborately staged theatrical event. So I deleted the last few posts from this thread, two of my own posts, and three responding posts.

I also changed the thread title from

Boston Bombing Was a Hoax! Ignoring the Alternative Research

to

The Boston Bombing was an elaborately staged theatrical event.

[Deborah (ahamkara)]

Bombs did explode that day. I have a good friend who was one of the injured. i visited him and saw first hand the damage from the bomb and shrapnel. The event itself may have been staged, but real people were injured.

[Hervé]

Posted by ahamkara (here)
Bombs did explode that day. I have a good friend who was one of the injured. i visited him and saw first hand the damage from the bomb and shrapnel. The event itself may have been staged, but real people were injured.

Thank you so much, ahamkara, for your testimony.

This is the kind of things I have been documenting in that 52-page long thread no one wants to investigate and would rather gobble up the psy-op/social engineering which pounded into people's mind via "planted interpretations" that the entire event was a Hollywood production from start to finish.

All these "It's all fake" displays are discarding fundamental, basic, pertinent, relevant and very important FACTS because their starting point is that the explosions were faked by flash bombs, etc, design to distract from the illusionists slight of hands. That's where the crux of the matter lies because discernment is set off track, right off the bat.

My contention with the "Hollywood theatrical show" proponents has always been that these were, indeed real explosions (and wished to maintain the thread topic to said explosions instead of the thread attracting everything including a few kitchen and galley sinks).

Why?

If the explosions were the results of flash/smoke bombs, then, why broken windows on first and second floors of the buildings some 100' away? A flash bomb cannot do that! Or, if it can, said flash bomb must have also generated real casualties and injuries in its immediate vicinity.

Also, a flash bomb is not known to propel ball bearings in every direction and pepper the street, side-walks, wounds and 2nd floor office with these ball bearings... only real bombs can do that; not flash bombs!

Wait a minute... since flash/smoke bombs cannot do that (broken windows by ball-bearings) then they were real bombs... if they were real bombs, then there must have been real casualties... real injuries... real wounds... and horror of horrors: REAL BLOOD!

Notice these windows are double panes and one of them has only the outside pane broken indicating low velocity/energy projectiles (also demonstrates the bomb wasn't inside the building).

To be able to look at these pictures in their high resolution format, one can either check them on the net or click on "Reply With Quote" then go "Advanced" and that would display them at high resolution. Remember however that if you don't intend to leave a reply, to click the "Go back" button of your browser to return to the forum page.

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post671767

The dude who took this picture of the 2 Craft guys:

also wrote this:

Since yesterday's tragedy, I’ve been trying to separate what happened to me from what happened to a character in Hurt Locker or someone who made it out of the Twin Towers on 9/11. I want to know what actually happened to me and to the people that I love. I’m struggling with that. Today I was told that they found ball bearings throughout the office I was standing in, and that there are holes in the windows. I can't process that experience. I'm trying.

I was perched on a windowsill in the front office on the second floor at 667 Boylston Street, along with my other colleagues at marlo marketing/ communications....
[...]
When I looked back outside, I saw blood everywhere. I saw somebody’s arm on the sidewalk with no body attached. Twelve seconds passed, or so I'm told, and then another (quieter, but still substantial) blast hit. I brought my head back inside and looked back at my coworkers in the room. Everyone seemed to be looking up at me. I had the best view, I guess, and people wanted me to say what to do.
[...]
"RUN!" I shouted. "We have to get out of here!" I think that's what I said. Maybe it was less urgent than that. Maybe it was more like: “I think we should get out of here. I think we should run.” I don’t know. But people started going to the back of the office building. I looked back out the window and saw that there was now a river of blood running from the bodies. There was so much blood. People were moving–squirming, writhing–in the blood. I held down the shutter and took more pictures. I don’t know why. And then I ran.

... ball bearing balls:

High resolution at: http://sullydish.files.wordpress.com.../166665868.jpg

One would have to let the picture sink in to be able to spot dozens of these tiny, + shiny balls (i.e. let the pareidolia subside to let one see what's actually there)

But, for the "planted interpretations" about these pictures, feel free to peruse Jim Fetzer's article.

As far as I am concerned, the above makes the Boston bombings a real "False Flag" with horrific casualties and ensuing implementation of draconian actions and laws; not a complete "staged theatrical event" a la Hollywood -- from start to finish -- as Jim Fetzer would like his readers to believe.

[Hervé]

...

... ... ...

See: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post673274

[Tangri]

Posted by Hervé (here)

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by Hervé (here)
To be clear, here is an unequivocal example of what I call "planted interpretation": Mushroom Cloud Imaged By India’s Mars Orbiter Confirms Huge Explosion On Mars [bogus interpretation]

Hervé - this is off topic. Mars is a long distance from Boston.

This was given as an "unequivocal" example of a a "planted interpretation" (front-loading if you will) such as "fake, Hollywood-blood" on the sidewalk... until a sample is provided with analysis, that's a planted interpretation which casts doubt on it being actual blood.

... announcements of a drill over the PA system and in tweets prior to the event. If these purported facts are true, and I suspect they are, then they constitute more evidence that the Boston Bombing Was a Hoax, which is the topic of this thread.
[...]

PA announcement of "This is a drill" doesn't make it a "hoax" it only makes it a "False Flag" in which the distinction between actual casualties and drill portions have been deliberately confused.

Indeed there is a 52 page thread about this very problem and I am not interested in repeating it here or anywhere else. All I can say is that all the available evidence and various interpretations have been collected there, to peruse, for anyone interested in really digging the issue.

A False Flag, yes! A complete hoax, no! That's my opinion.

Herve, first I thought you were just pointing out that some trolls(It could be Jim Fetzer-I don't know him) might dilute the real story with false proofs.
But when you write

A False Flag, yes! A complete hoax, no

I accept that , this is your opinion. But, in my opinion, you misunderstood the whole story.


Below post was my respond to AMystic3434 's first paragraph's last sentence.

"I am not sure if you are a government contractor or just a naive human.
I strongly recommend you to check victims' background and search for hypovolemic shock after a laceration of limps.
None of the victims lost enough blood comparing with their injuries, and emergency respond from aid workers was not resonate with situation.
Also check smoke/ panic bombs
http://www.superiorsignal.com/smoke-...-smoke-grenade(link doesn't work anymore but you can check this link http://superiorsignal.com/superior-smoke)
I was fed up to write and explain for a while because of the gov contractors in Avalon forum but I am not sure on Nativity level/rate and I am doing it again."

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post669327

Still, I am not sure on Naivety level.

[Hervé]

Hi Tangri,

I am not sure of what you are trying to communicate?

One question I have is: Do you think one can break windows and pepper a place with ball-bearing balls with those: http://superiorsignal.com/smoke-prod...-smoke-grenade ?