Top us commander under arrest for refusing to fire nukes at russia (more Sorcha Faal CIA BS)

[Harley]

OK, one more time for those of you who obviously are not reading all of the posts here:

Please DONT BOTHER with Sorcha Fal's BS.

Please DO read the info I provided in Post #7.

Posted by Harley (here)
Oh and by the way, she was only the wing commander (basically an administrative position) and would not have any control whatsoever over the launch codes nor the ability to abort a launch order.

The E-6's all carry a General Class Officer in command of the Battle Staff and they are all linked through RF Comms and Satellite to the Looking Glass and E-4B's, which are linked directly to the Pentagon and the White House.

Once an EWO (Emergency War Order) is transmitted by POTUS (President) across this network, and then Authenticated by the Battle Staffs, there will be no stopping it as each aircraft carry a complete ALCS (Airborne Launch Control System) and Missile Launch Crew.

There is no 'Middle Man'.

Why my info over Sorcha Fal's? Oh I don't know. Why don't you try asking Sorcha Fal if he/she has 20 years worth of direct experience?

Let me know how that works out for ya.

[giovonni]

hmm ...

According to a new report from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), nine nations — the United States, Russia, United Kingdom, France, China, India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea — possess approximately 16,300 nuclear weapons. in total.Jun 17, 2014

Yes, Prime Minister - The nuclear button

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=DUzRJfAc-HU

[Selene]

Here’s another perspective:

Let’s say that – in true disinfo fashion – a significant portion of the Sorcha Fool report is actually true, necessarily, in order to suck us in. This nuclear incident really happened; a nuclear message was thwarted and ‘somebody’ was pissed off. A commander/top officer has been arrested. Reuters has confirmed.

But beyond that, here’s where it gets interesting. Who is supposed to be blamed/exonerated here for giving that nuclear order? Who - what group – then resisted? What really happened? And is Fool now charged with re-spinning the story, to blame ‘someone else’? Who’s covering, and what and why?

Again and again, we have recently been seeing serious military flag officers with their fingers on the nuclear buttons being removed from their command. I haven’t the patience nor research skill (Buares/Francois, please help?) to cite all the senior US nuclear command here that have been removed over the past 24 months on entirely flimsy token excuses (“gambling” “drinking on shore leave” etc.) from the nuclear command.

But we have utterly no information – and warring reports – about what may or may not be going on in Washington. Were they actually fired:

a) Because they refused a (say) Bush/Cheney/Zionist/secret government order to fire a nuke? Are those removed actually the White Hats?

b) Or were they relieved of command because they themselves were part of that cabal and were rooted out by so-called Patriots in the Pentagon? Who’s on first?

I suspect a larger effort to ‘turn’ the story is part of the Faal release.

But by whom? Who has the upper hand here? Faal’s report might benefit from some deeper analysis. Flat rejection as ‘stupid’ may not serve us well. More questions might be necessary.

Control of the planet’s nuclear arsenal is at stake. And no one – no one – will publically discuss this.

That silence, in itself, is significant and this does concern us all.

Regards,

Selene

[Hervé]

"We do not need the celestial threat to disguise Cold War intentions; rather we need the Cold War to disguise celestial intentions!"

~ British astronomer Victor Clube, author of The Cosmic Serpent and The Cosmic Winter, in a report commissioned by the U.S. Air Force