Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Newton's universal law of gravitation equation expressed without mass (m) component (one step closer to anti-gravity)

  1. Link to Post #1
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    4th December 2014
    Posts
    1,442
    Thanks
    2,127
    Thanked 8,799 times in 1,357 posts

    Default Newton's universal law of gravitation equation expressed without mass (m) component (one step closer to anti-gravity)

    Scientific paper is being prepared...
    Last edited by WhiteLove; 6th June 2015 at 19:50.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to WhiteLove For This Post:

    Carmody (31st May 2015), hohoemi (1st June 2015), wnlight (31st May 2015)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Avalon Member Carmody's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th August 2010
    Location
    Winning The Galactic Lottery
    Posts
    11,389
    Thanks
    17,597
    Thanked 82,375 times in 10,237 posts

    Default Re: Newton's universal law of gravitation equation expressed without mass (m) component (one step closer to anti-gravity)

    Paul Dirac had a serious problem with 'renormalization' in QM. for all the right reasons.

    The problem was the introduction of complex infinities, which subsequent calculations could not handle.

    The reality was that the origin of the complex infinities was dimensional encoding and co-joining, in complex vectored spin.

    Thus is was a purely mechanical calculation for simple dimensional interaction, and required math no more complex than newton's original levels.

    It is the reason why the 'speed of light' seems like a brick wall. It is a turnover point, an exchange point, a reflection and inflection point, not a limit.

    The error in logic is written right into the Wikipedia entry:

    Quote In order to make contact with reality, then, the formulae would have to be rewritten in terms of measurable, renormalized quantities
    'in order to make contact with reality', and 'measurable', meaning 'measurable by devices and methods anchored in the one mindset and dimensional norms'.

    Measurement is not reality, it is merely measurement, nothing more. It is a comparative, nothing more. It possesses zero, nothing at all... in being an anchoring point for reality. Only an idiot would suggest or project that measurement of anything is a form of reality.

    The math indicated other things, so they simple erased the 'other things'.

    The more impossible the problem to solve ----the more fundamental the error in the creation of the question.

    In this case, the very logic foundation of QM, as assessed and created by popular vote in it's origins, went horribly wrong. It went on projection and opinion, not on the inherent presented logic.
    Last edited by Carmody; 31st May 2015 at 21:53.
    Interdimensional Civil Servant

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Carmody For This Post:

    hohoemi (1st June 2015), seko (1st June 2015), WhiteLove (31st May 2015)

  5. Link to Post #3
    Deactivated
    Join Date
    6th December 2010
    Posts
    600
    Thanks
    1,824
    Thanked 2,110 times in 521 posts

    Default Re: Newton's universal law of gravitation equation expressed without mass (m) component (one step closer to anti-gravity)

    excellent thread ...

    this is my understanding:

    G - M = m
    (gravity field strength - magnetic field strength = mass)

    we as humans, are only able to observe m that is of a similar field strength to us (a spectrum, as in electromagnetic spectrum). for a human this is linked to the field strength of NOCH (amino acid). ie. all the matter (as in the periodic table) that we can perceive is a minuscule portion of the universe and all this matter has a field strength related to NOCH. that is why you only see the "shell" of the sun, you can't see anything inside. the shell we observe is linked to your field strength (the observer).

    99.999% of m is unobservable & unmeasurable by us (this is the so called "dark matter"). it is only 0.001% of m that we are able to observe. the so called "god particle" occurs at the boundary condition when m starts to become observable. they can keep smashing particles, looking for the "god particle", they wont find what they are looking for. it is like looking at the toe of an elephant and trying to see the whole elephant. they are not able to perceive or measure the rest of the elephant at the field-strength level us beings, humans, operate at. they would be better off if they adopted this approach: this is how water behaves in a bucket (the field strength they can observe) then extrapolate how it would work in a bath, a river, the ocean (source). it's all the same water.

    if you are a being, made of something other than NOCH, your field strength would be different, this also applies to something with very little m (an entity or field-being), your field strength is different to that of our observable universe and we wont see you and you wont see us, even though we could be standing right on top of each other.

    G & M are always try to attain balance (it is very active and dynamic). it is the slight in-balance between G & M that creates m (hence the formula at the beginning of this post). all the formula's of the OP, only apply within this 0.001% band that we can observe. this is where the limitation of c is imposed (the speed of light limitation). c can be of order of magnitude many times higher at higher field-strengths (ie. in excess of 10^20 faster)

    there is no such thing as negative gravity or anti-gravity, there is only positioning. your position is dictated by your magnetic and gravitational field strength relative to the magnetic and gravitation field strength of your environment. alter your magnetic field strength (which in turn will alter you gravitational field strength proportionally), then your position will change. positioning of: the planets; the galaxies; the electron, our bodies on the planet and a ufo in space are all positioned in this way. when your field strength is greater than that of the environment .. you fly (ie. you are able to dictate your position) if you are not able to increase (or decrease) your field strength then the stronger fields continue to dictate and you don't fly. ie. the earth's gravity will field keep you firmly on the ground.

    gravity and magnetic fields are opposite sides of the same coin. ie. when two like poles of a magnet interact, call that magnetic field interaction. when two dissimilar poles of a magnet interact, call that gravity field interaction.

    ps. your soul for example is NOT in the "matter" field strength region (and probably has very little m). this is how RV / intuition works, it uses the "non-local" (higher field strength) component of yourself to perceive at levels we (the body) can't access
    Last edited by Aurelius; 2nd June 2015 at 21:13.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts