Stunning new advance in metallurgy - nano-coated steel, stronger and more durable

[Carmody]

Then, for the fun of it, two minutes later, i go to Joseph Farrell's website..and read, regarding cold fusion...(this is tied to the discrete steps found by David Hudson in his ORME research)

If one goes to 3 hours and 47 minutes into the video, when the reactor blows up, just prior to this you'll notice a curious thing. On the video there are the usual scientific graphs. But if one looks at these graphs carefully, you'll see an intriguing thing which one can just barely make out on the blurry image: the rises in temperature in the reactor appear to occur in distinct, quantizable, "steps" rather than as a gradual rise in temperature, and moreover, appear to do so more or less in regular steps of a certain periodicity and frequency. For those who've been following the story of this strange phenomenon, and indeed, the work of Russian astrophysicist Dr. Nikolai Kozyrev, this phenomenon was more or less predicted by his work. And followers of "finge science" will recall yet another strange step-like, quantizable phenomenon: the work of Thomas Townsend Brown and his "gravitors", essentially large capacitors that when fully charged on a swinging pendulum arm, would float up in one smooth motion, but fall back to their rest state in distinct, quantizable jumps, features which suggest that the interplay of nuclear and electromagnetic reactions might be more complex and interrelated than conventional models would perhaps admit.

And Einstein talks about radiation. Photonic information, photon radiation.

Note that the UFO's predominately shine ridiculously bright, like arc light, like wideband emitters, pure white light, so bright it is like a mirror but has distinct issues of.. like trying to look at a holograph that seems both 2d and 3d at the same time.... which I have found is a very potent part of out of time real world temporal crossing type 'visions'.

[Carmody]

Of course, exactly this needed thing shows up, at this exact time:

Superconductivity in superatoms

Superatoms actually behave in some ways like a giant atom. Electrons flow inside them in a predictable shell structure, as if in a single atom's electron cloud.

Electron shells are the result of a quantum effect—a physical property described by the special laws of quantum mechanics. The shells are the orbits of increasing size at which electrons can be found around an atom. They occur in a predictable fashion: Two electrons zip around the nucleus in the closest orbit, eight in the next highest orbit, 18 in the third and so on.

The fact that superatoms are not just solid particles but also possess a giant set of electron shells made scientists suspect that they might also exhibit another quantum effect: Cooper pairing.

To test that hypothesis, Kresin and his team painstakingly built aluminum superatoms of specific sizes (from 32 to 95 atoms large) and then zapped them with a laser at various temperatures. They recorded how many electrons they were able to knock off of the superatom as they dialed up the energy level of the laser.

The subsequent plot on a graph should have been a simple upward curve—as the energy of the laser increases, more electrons should be knocked off in a smoothly proportional manner.

For superatoms containing 37, 44, 66 and 68 aluminum atoms, the graph instead showed odd bulges indicating that at certain energy levels, the electrons were resisting the laser's effort to knock them away from the group—possibly because Cooper pairing was helping the electrons to cling to each other.

The bulge appears as temperature decreases—with the threshold for its appearance occurring somewhere around 100 Kelvin, giving evidence that the electrons were forming Cooper pairs.

The future of superconductors

Superatoms that form Cooper pairs represent an entirely new frontier in the field of superconductivity. Scientists can explore the superconductivity of various sizes of superatoms and various elements to make them.

"One-hundred Kelvin might not be the upper-temperature barrier," Kresin said. "It might just be the beginning."

Kresin envisions a future in which electronic circuits could be built by placing superatoms in a chain along a substrate material, allowing electricity to flow unhindered along the chain.


http://phys.org/news/2015-02-world-superconductors.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A team of researchers led by Marco Grioni at EPFL has used a cutting-edge spectroscopic technique to explore the unique superconductivity of cuprates. The scientists used a technique called Resonant Inelastic X-ray Scattering, which is used to investigate the electronic structure of materials. This high-resolution method was able to monitor what happens to the electrons of a cuprate sample as it turned into a superconductor.

"Normally, superconductors hate magnetism," says Grioni. "Either you have a good magnet or a good superconductor, but not both. Cuprates are very different and have really surprised everyone, because they are normally insulators and magnets, but they become superconducting when a few extra electrons are added by gently tweaking its chemical composition."

The key ingredient of magnetism is a property of electrons called spin, which can be thought of as the moment of a spinning top. Spins can interact with each other and create spin waves that travel across the material. When magnetic materials are disturbed, spin waves are created and spread in ripples throughout their volume. Such spin waves are telltale fingerprints of the magnetic interaction and structure.

Even when they become superconducting, cuprates do not lose their magnetic properties. "Something of the magnet remains in the superconductor, and could play a major role in the appearance of superconductivity " says Grioni. "The new results give us a better idea of how the spins interact in these fascinating materials."

The findings propose a novel understanding of superconductivity in cuprates, and possibly in other high-temperature superconductors. By revealing the role of spin interactions, it might pave the way for bringing high-temperature superconductors into the real world.


Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2014-12-electro...ivity.html#jCp

[Carmody]

What the above post does, is it illustrates a component behind the mechanism of 'making the steel 10x stronger'. That when the ion in the solution is of the correct size, and then electrically, and thus electromagnetically ...brought to the correct energy and complex physical and electron spin polarization level, and it 'binds' to the correct spot in the build structure..it can create bonding quality and strength situations, which were not previously thought possible.

For (aluminum) superatoms containing 37, 44, 66 and 68 aluminum atoms, the graph instead showed odd bulges indicating that at certain energy levels, the electrons were resisting the laser's effort to knock them away from the group—possibly because Cooper pairing was helping the electrons to cling to each other.

In the course of doing that, high temperature superconductors can be built or layered into existence. Which, of course, have a method of being 'fired up', which is the same signal fundamentals they were brought into being via. Slight DC and an AC carrier. Once the AC carrier has stabilize the system, then the DC is applied at whatever level is necessary, and we have a high temp superconductor, with possibly capacitive intermediary layers.

[Carmody]

more...... less than 24 hours later.

One can see how quickly this is gathering force, how quickly the components are coming together, with respect to being public and having the potential to be put all in one spot.

New 'knobs' can dial in control of materials

Designing or exploring new materials is all about controlling their properties. In a new study, Cornell scientists offer insight on how different "knobs" can change material properties in ways that were previously unexplored or misunderstood.

"The ultimate goal is to control electronic and magnetic properties of new materials using various knobs," said Kyle Shen, associate professor of physics, who led the study published in Physical Review Letters in January. "What you want is to turn one knob, change some parameter, and turn a material from this to that."

The bread-and-butter methods of tuning materials' properties include introducing impurities, such as chemical dopants, or modifying their atomic structures. Here, the researchers took a different approach, by employing an effect known as the spin-orbit interaction. This is the phenomenon an electron experiences when moving past another charged object, such as the atomic nucleus, and it is particularly pronounced in heavier elements near the bottom of the periodic table.

Typical complex electronic materials are "transition metal oxides," where the metal is usually a lighter element such as copper, manganese, titanium or nickel. In this study, Shen and his group replaced the lighter transition metal with a much heavier element – iridium, a very rare element often found in meteorites. This replacement enhanced the effect of the spin-orbit interactions in the compound strontium iridate (SrIrO3).

In the absence of spin-orbit interactions, theoretical calculations predicted that strontium iridate would be a conventional metal. However, the researchers discovered that the strong spin-orbit interactions caused strontium iridate to teeter on the brink of being either a metal or a semiconductor – a "semimetal."

Small disturbances to the crystal structure would cause the material to flip from being insulating to metallic, suggesting that the spin-orbit interaction could be a new way of controlling the electronic properties of complex materials.

And another:

Probing electron behaviour at the tips of nanocones

One of the ways of improving electrons manipulation is though better control over one of their inner characteristics, called spin. This approach is the object of an entire field of study, known as spintronics. Now, Richard Pincak from the Slovak Academy of Sciences and colleagues have just uncovered new possibilities for manipulating the electrons on the tips of graphitic nanocones. Indeed, in a study published in EPJ B, they have shown that because the tip area offers the greatest curvature, it gives rise, in the presence of defects, to an enhanced manifestation of a phenomenon called spin-orbit interaction. This, in turn, affects its electronic characteristics. These nanocones could thus become candidates for a new type of scanning probe in atomic force microscopy.

Spin-orbit interaction refers to the interaction of an electron's spin with its motion. Such spin-orbit interaction can, for example, cause shifts in an electron's atomic energy levels. This is due to electromagnetic interaction between the electron's spin and the magnetic field generated by the electron's orbit around the nucleus. In carbon, such interaction is expected to be weak because of its low atomic number. Yet, in a carbon nanocone, the spin-orbit interaction is different and thought to be induced by the curvature.

Pincak and colleagues found that the spin-orbit interaction considerably affects the local density of the nanocone's electron states. They also discovered that the extent of defects makes a difference. The more defects there are, the greater the curvature of the nanocone in the vicinity of the tip - and the greater the effect of the spin-orbit interaction is. This in turn produces the highest impact on the cone's electronic properties. These findings provide a new potential for exploiting the spin-orbit interaction induced by curvature to manipulate electrons in spintronics applications.

[eaglespirit]

The more defects there are, the greater the curvature of the nanocone in the vicinity of the tip - and the greater the effect of the spin-orbit interaction is.


Hmmm, sounds and feels like the earth's current transition spin...
hang on and BE aware !!! : )

[Carmody]

More connection. read closely. RF and superconductors: electrets are built almost in the exact same way as this layering system.

Do you see it taking shape now?

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post938118

Posted by Carmody (here)

Posted by Carmody (here)

Posted by Limor (here)

Posted by Carmody (here)
Another critical point is that this experience that cracked my head entirely open, this experience allowed me to deeply explore all my origins and life, to the point of birth--and beyond. I rewired my head and it was painful -no doubt. The break down was total, and I'd not have it any other way.

This wiring change had the effect of sublimating or dropping the ego-body response from such a high level of control in my life. The body ego response ended up showing itself as LIMITING my intellectual capacity and reach. The body-ego 'freezes you out' so to speak. Like a autonomous hypnotic state that has descended upon the body-edifice and hobbles the occupying spirit body.

MY IQ, I estimated (at that time), at the peak, had extended to 200+ --and beyond. I purposely stepped way from it, as I had one foot in each world and had to make a decision. To stay here with the rest of you--or go. Most of the intellectual capacity and some of ethereal sensitivity stayed, but the incredible magic and connection dissipated. I was in a state where anything, anything at all was possible. But the body could not handle it. Which is why I mercilessly exercised and kept my body in absolute peak condition. The drain was immense. What that state of mind and being told me, is that the stories of old...are true. Very very true. Men stomping around like gods (as seen by this imprisoned state). I was inches away from it, and backed off. Not my purpose.

Which is the overall intellectual level that our spirit bodies (that integrate with our physical bodies) are at. I effectively erased the barrier. But it cannot be held, in my experience, while living in this modern world.

Hello Carmody,

Reading your above post from 2010, I wonder if you are able to expand more on which methodology/device/organic or advanced technology you used which transformed your reality in such a way? or link to a separate post where you wrote about it in more detail.

Originally posted by Carmody:" Orgone is a tough one. Great at what it does, if we truly understand what it is doing, when we use it, when we build and place it, etc.

the problem with orgone is that it is an open ended system, it is not 'enclosed'. This is by definition, when dealing with unknowns - not a very smart thing to be doing."

What are the disadvantages of an open ended system? also, in relations to that, what are your thoughts on the Tensor field, which is a point to point 'enclosed' form of energy if I understand it correct, and more specifically it's efficiency when it comes to building devices such as the tensor rings

Thank you,

Limor

Sorry Limor, I forgot to answer this one.

I'll tackle it a bit at a time.

In this case, open ended vs closed. Simply a way of describing the 'effects' of the given device, on and with the given environment.

for example, RF or radio frequency type resonating accumulators.

Orgone type accumulators.

Antenna type devices/accumulators.

That kind of device resonates dark matter and creates tremendous interference fields in the immediate area and the resonance CAN build, and generally does. It utilizes the local fabric as part of the action of the system. A fairly large area of cubic volume, where the fabric can be slowly weakened, over time..

It goes back to the dynamo story.

Run a dynamo up to a high speed, and slam it to a stop, and then start it up immediately and get to a specific RPM.

Do the same again, but wait a few seconds to start the dynamo.

The one which was stopped/started immediately, takes 10% less energy to get back up to speed. (with all fudge factors taken care of, the 10% increase in efficiency remains, the raw number is actually higher)

This is due to the local space-time fabric that the dynamo is ensconced within...is still spinning. For a few seconds.

Thus, the very fabric of space is manipulated at the quantum/dark level, by the dynamo.

When you get to the idea of resonating the ultra high frequencies in the local space-time via RF devices...well....

With that type of device, it's dimensional leakage and crossing/integration, earthquakes, hurricanes, and all that kind of stuff.

Things like E-cats, H-cats, LENR devices, some of the spinning gravity types, some of the rotating magnet types. In the case of the LENR types, purely closed systems that work on small amounts of 'matter' in enclosed systems that break or breach dimensions like pressure being let out of a container, through a foam that slows the wave. Just an analogy that helps one understand the potentials so that we don't wipe ourselves out.

I mentioned once, the idea of making pyramid orgone devices in the form of an electret, which would probably be one (if not the) of the most horrifically dangerous types you could make, especially since we have no experience in what is going on in the first place.

Much more gentle...... and no resonating the local space time.

Regarding these matters, when I warned about using electrets in pyramid/orgone devices:

US Patent 8901943 granted December 2 2014

Gravitational attenuating material
US Patent 8901943 granted December 2, 2014 - Gravity Shielding via Electret Materials Note: Professor RC Gupta was inspired by Nobel Prize Laureate, Professor Abdus Salam to research the connection between Electrostatics and Gravity. Google: Gravity as a Secondary Electrostatic Force.

Abstract - A gravitational attenuating material that utilizes an organic based material that has the electrons of the dielectric reconfigured through the use of electrostatic fields, magnetic fields, or photonic or actinic radiation as to render the dielectric less interactive with gravitational forces. The dielectric material is a solid, homo-charged, bipolar binary material having aligned dipoles and made of a polymer and hydrocarbon molecules. Each of the hydrocarbon molecules has at least one aromatic ring and cyclic electron ring current therein. The hydrocarbon molecules are benzene-series molecules, substituted-benzene-series molecules, chloronapthalene molecules, 1,4-dichloronapthalene molecules, chlorobenzene molecules, or 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene molecules.

It has been suggested by the research of Podkletnov, Fontana, Tajmar and others that polarized structures such as rf stimulated ceramic superconductors have a reduced interaction with gravity that manifests itself by the reduction of the readings of a scale on which the material rests.

At present, the Dr Eugnevy Podlketnov gravity modification experiment that involved the rotation of a ytterium barium copper oxide superconductors that was rotated at high speed seems not to have been confirmed by other researchers. The large disc approximating 18 inches in diameter had to be isostatically pressed from the aforementioned ceramic material and then must be of sufficient strength to undergo rapid rotation while being subjected to a rf, radio frequency field. Also, the expense that is incurred in the formation of the disc is most substantial as well as being most difficult to form.

There are few materials in which electrostatic forces are trapped within the material. The most notable is the electret. The term: electret was coined by Sir Oliver Heaviside as the conjunction of two words: electrostatic and magnet. Electrets can be formed from dipolar as well as non-polar molecules. In order to form an electret, dipolar or non-polar molecules are brought to their melting point, then through a series of electrodes the material is polarized by being exposed to a high energy electric field while the material solidifies. In such cases as rosin-carnuaba wax electrets, the material contain trapped electrostatic charges at the interfaces of the two mixed materials as well as experience an alignment of their dipoles.

It is a goal of this invention to produce a gravitationally modifying or attenuating material that does not rely upon the use of superconductive materials, nor does it have the requirement that such a material be chilled to cyrogenic temperatures to produce an effect.

An object of the invention is to create a gravitational modification or attentuating material that reduces the gravitational attraction of the material and materials contained in the vicinity of the material through the use of an organic material. Organic materials are characterized by the presence of a carbon atom, usually the term organic refers to hydrocarbons. Within the group of such hydrocarbon materials is the benzene-series of molecules.

[Carmody]

All of it is dimensional crossing and leakage. Anti-gravity, over unity, mass reduction, FTL travel (warp speed kinda label), transmutation, psychic sensitivity, OBE's, astral travel, all of it is one thing.

Dimensional egress and energetic pattern exchange, via resonance coupling. All of it.

This illustrates that the semi-impervious nature of atomic/quantum systems is externally applied, which is ..semi-obvious. (in retrospect)


Note the article's theoretical aspects speak of the simultaneous creation of photonic light, and dark matter, as a 'result'. So, you've got anti-gravity/dimensional craft out there..and well, what do you see in them?

Exactly that.

Higgs particle can disintegrate into particles of dark matter, according to new model




The 'Standard Model' of particle physics successfully describes the smallest constituents of matter. But the model has its limitations – it does not explain the dark matter of the universe. Christoffer Petersson, a research scientist at Chalmers University of Technology, has found a solution. His theories are now being tested at the particle physics laboratory CERN.

Physicists describe the smallest constituents of nature – elementary particles and forces acting between them using a set of theories known as "the Standard Model". This model was developed in the 1970s and has been very successful, particularly in predicting the existence of undiscovered particles.

In recent decades, particle physicists have discovered one of the predicted particles in the Standard Model after another in their particle accelerators. The last in the series was the Higgs particle, the existence of which was confirmed by the scientists at the particle accelerator Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN in 2012. This completed the Standard Model.

The problem is that there are several things the Standard Model is unable to explain, for example the dark matter that makes up a large part of the universe. Many particle physicists are therefore working on the development of new, more comprehensive models.

One of them is Christoffer Petersson, who carries out research in theoretical particle physics at Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden and the Université Libre in Belgium. Together with two research colleagues he has proposed a particle model based on what is known as supersymmetry.

This model contains more elementary particles than the Standard Model, including dark matter particles. In addition, the model gives the Higgs particle different properties than the Standard Model predicts. The model proposes that the Higgs particle can distintegrate into a photon (a particle of light) and particles of dark matter. However, these properties are quite difficult to discover – you have to look for them specifically to have a chance of finding them.

But Christoffer Petersson is fortunate – his model has met with a response at CERN. Two independent experimental stations – Atlas and CMS – at the Large Hadron Collider are now looking for the very properties of the Higgs particle his model predicts. If the properties are there, it is a clear indication that the model fits.

"It's a dream for a theorist in particle physics. LHC is the only place where the model can be tested. It's even nicer that two independent experiments are going to do it," says Christoffer Petersson.

In the first studies the volume of data was unfortunately too small for it to be possible to either confirm or reject Petersson's model.

"But we are already in full swing with new analyses in which we are testing his model in other ways and with more data. We congratulate Christoffer Petersson for having done an important job," says Zeynap Demiragli at the CMS experiment at CERN.

After being closed down for a time for an upgrade, LHC will start up again in the spring of 2015. With higher energies in the accelerator, the experiments will finally gather sufficient data to evaluate Petersson's model properly. He is on tenterhooks awaiting the results.

"If the model is found to fit, it would completely change our understanding of the fundamental building blocks of nature. If not, just the fact that they are willing to test my model at CERN is great," he says.'

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Regarding the dimensional integration in resonance, that the earth has, which is the ley lines and the vortex lines, that correspond to different frequencies and thus different platonic solids in their lines or effect on areas (thus ley lines)...when they start up the LHC, the effect would be a bit like this, like a finger touching a resonating plasma ball, at the LHC location. It will shift things. How bad that is, is indeterminate. However, the pyramid complex was of such a nature, so we shall see.

[hohoemi]

For those of us wondering when exactly the LHC is going to power up again, I found the following info:

From http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-31162725
In Mid-March, they are running practice leaps with two beams of photons doing the full circuit in both directions for the first time in 2 years.
If those go well, the real experiments are going to commence in May.

2015 schedule: https://espace.cern.ch/be-dep/BEDepa...edule_2015.pdf
Long term schedule: http://lhc-commissioning.web.cern.ch...-long-term.htm

(I have no idea whether the practice runs in March will be enough to produce the effects Carmody is describing or not.)

[Carmody]

More and more:

When mediated by superconductivity, light pushes matter million times more


When a mirror reflects light, it experiences a slight push. This radiation pressure can be increased considerably with the help of a small superconducting island. This was revealed by the joint research done in the Aalto University and the Universities of Jyväskylä and Oulu. The finding paves a way for the studies of mechanical oscillations at the level of a single photon, the quantum of light. The results of the research were published in Nature Communications in April.

In our everyday lives, the effects of the radiation pressure of light can be neglected. Your furniture is not moved over even though the light, or more generally the electromagnetic radiation, emitted by your lamps bounces off from its surfaces thus creating a radiation pressure force. An ordinary 100 Watt light-bulb causes a radiation pressure that is only a trillionth of the normal atmospheric pressure. Nevertheless, in space the relevance of the phenomenon becomes apparent: because of the radiation pressure the tails of comets typically point away from the Sun. Radiation pressure has also been proposed as the propulsion for the solar sails.

In the recent years, the radiation pressure has been harnessed also in the field of laser physics. It can be used to couple the electromagnetic laser field to, for example, the movement of the small mechanical oscillators that can be found inside ordinary watches. Due to the weakness of the interaction, one typically needs substantially strong laser fields.

****(actually, I designed a system that does this better, and does it in the form of an isolated system. This was to create a noise free bubble...a dimensionally 'clean' and noise/interference free oscillator so that one could use that -----as the basis of creating perfect alloy skins for dimensional craft. A perfect folded back isolated resonator. Those who know who is writing this, can check on that.)****

"Radiation pressure physics in these systems have become measurable only when the oscillator is hit by millions of photons," explains theorist Jani Tuorila from the University of Oulu.

In the work reported here, the researchers combine their knowledge on experimental and theoretical physics, and show how the strength of the radiation pressure coupling can be considerably increased. They placed a superconducting island in between the electromagnetic field and the oscillator to mediate the interaction.

"In the measurements, we exploited the Josephson coupling of the superconducting junctions, especially its nonlinear character," explains Juha Pirkkalainen from Aalto University, the post-doctoral researcher who conducted the measurements.

The researchers were able to alter the radiation pressure coupling significantly.

"With the superconducting island, the radiation pressure increased a millionfold the value we had previously achieved," reports the supervisor of the experimental group, professor Mika Sillanpää from Aalto University.

Because of the increased radiation pressure coupling, the oscillator observes the electromagnetic field with the precision of a single photon. Correspondingly, the oscillators reveal themselves to the field with the resolution of a single quantum of oscillations, a phonon.

"Such strong coupling allows, in principle, the measurement of quantum information from an oscillator nearly visible to the naked eye," explains professor Tero Heikkilä from the University of Jyväskylä who was in charge of the theoretical studies.

The research enables the observation of quantum phenomena in larger structures than before. Thus, it allows studying the validity of the quantum mechanical laws in large structures. – Some claim that the theory holds only with very small particles. Nevertheless, the existence of an upper limit for the validity region has not been found – yet.

Explore further: An optomechanical crystal to study interactions among colocalized photons and phonons

More information: "Cavity optomechanics mediated by a quantum two-level system," Nature Communications 6, 27 April 2015., http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2015/15...comms7981.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gee.....those bright and shiny, insanely bright white, perfect full spectrum light..UFO's.

And much much more:

How spacetime is built by quantum entanglement

A collaboration of physicists and a mathematician has made a significant step toward unifying general relativity and quantum mechanics by explaining how spacetime emerges from quantum entanglement in a more fundamental theory. The paper announcing the discovery by Hirosi Ooguri, a Principal Investigator at the University of Tokyo's Kavli IPMU, with Caltech mathematician Matilde Marcolli and graduate students Jennifer Lin and Bogdan Stoica, will be published in Physical Review Letters as an Editors' Suggestion "for the potential interest in the results presented and on the success of the paper in communicating its message, in particular to readers from other fields."

Physicists and mathematicians have long sought a Theory of Everything (ToE) that unifies general relativity and quantum mechanics. General relativity explains gravity and large-scale phenomena such as the dynamics of stars and galaxies in the universe, while quantum mechanics explains microscopic phenomena from the subatomic to molecular scales.

The holographic principle is widely regarded as an essential feature of a successful Theory of Everything. The holographic principle states that gravity in a three-dimensional volume can be described by quantum mechanics on a two-dimensional surface surrounding the volume. In particular, the three dimensions of the volume should emerge from the two dimensions of the surface. However, understanding the precise mechanics for the emergence of the volume from the surface has been elusive.

Now, Ooguri and his collaborators have found that quantum entanglement is the key to solving this question. Using a quantum theory (that does not include gravity), they showed how to compute energy density, which is a source of gravitational interactions in three dimensions, using quantum entanglement data on the surface. This is analogous to diagnosing conditions inside of your body by looking at X-ray images on two-dimensional sheets. This allowed them to interpret universal properties of quantum entanglement as conditions on the energy density that should be satisfied by any consistent quantum theory of gravity, without actually explicitly including gravity in the theory. The importance of quantum entanglement has been suggested before, but its precise role in emergence of spacetime was not clear until the new paper by Ooguri and collaborators.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

'Quantum Weirdness' and 'Many Interacting Worlds'

Recently, the new "many interacting worlds" (MIW) theory of quantum mechanics has received a lot of popular press, in venues such as Nature, New Scientist, and The Huffington Post. This theory provides one possible explanation or interpretation of the "weird" phenomena observed in quantum experiments.

I'm writing to explain in basic terms how I was led to create what has come to be called MIW theory, how it works, and what it might mean. I stress at the outset, though, that this new theory does not prove anything definitive about the true nature of quantum reality, at least not yet. That's because no experiments have been performed that distinguish the predictions of MIW theory from standard quantum theory.

What MIW theory does do is to significantly broaden the scope of what might really be out there. That's because other interpretations of quantum mechanics assume the existence of a special kind of quantum wave called the "wavefunction." MIW theory, on the other hand, makes the same predictions without using any wavefunction.

For slightly to greatly more advanced treatments, see here, here, here, here, and here.

Earlier, mathematically related work can be found here and here.

The Meaning of 'Many Interacting Worlds' Theory

According to MIW theory, quantum reality isn't a wave but a collection of parallel worlds. In each of these worlds, every object has very definite physical attributes, such as position and momentum. Within a given world, objects interact classically (i.e., according to the ordinary "Newtonian" physics of our macroscopic experience). But in addition to this, nearby worlds also interact, and it's this world interaction that gives rise to all quantum phenomena observed in nature.

What do we mean by a "nearby world"? This means a world that has all the same objects or "particles" as our world, in nearly the exact same positions, as in the figure below. The particle "copies" that live in the other world need to be very near the "originals" in our world in order for the two worlds to interact quantum-mechanically. The distance between each particle and its copy must be essentially on the nanoscopic scale.

On the other hand, the different particles themselves do not need to be close together in order to experience quantum effects. Distant particles can be indirectly correlated, owing to quantum interactions with a nearby world. This is how MIW explains or interprets the phenomenon known as "quantum entanglement."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is happening very very fast now. Very fast.

And, above, in earlier posts...I speak on the superconducting alloy skin, so one can have a drive/propulsion/gating/transfer/translation system and a dimensional bubble, all in one.

The entire UFO hardware skin technical basis is right here, in this thread. All supported by scientific articles, and a solid scientific backdrop.

(If anyone is wondering, this did get me a black helicopter flyover, a few hours back (for a different post, at a different place, but on a connected subject.)

As well, I recently published the actual full nano alloy particle component manufacturing technique. The one that allows for the desired particles, in a form of a perfected method, and perfected particle, so one can create 'superconducting islands', as an alloy. A practical existing tested process.

And yo, just so you know. It is total kitchen table level in scope and costs.

[Carmody]

Posted by Carmody (here)
Superatoms actually behave in some ways like a giant atom. Electrons flow inside them in a predictable shell structure, as if in a single atom's electron cloud.

Electron shells are the result of a quantum effect—a physical property described by the special laws of quantum mechanics. The shells are the orbits of increasing size at which electrons can be found around an atom. They occur in a predictable fashion: Two electrons zip around the nucleus in the closest orbit, eight in the next highest orbit, 18 in the third and so on.

It is important to note that this phenomenon, indicates, like a mirrored reflection, the resonance points, the energy levels, and the geometry of the underlying 'creation' of the fabric of the 2D integrated fields of the universe..the complex polarized integrative spin points of 2d field pairing that creates a 'particle', and thus creates our 'floating' viewpoint called a 3d timespace universe...

as the 2d fields spin lock, in polarized coupling, they create a 'side pool', floating area, a resonance coupled mode-space, and that is our linear unidirectional 3d timespace, we call a dimension. It 'emerges' from one geometrically aligned and polarized direction.


It is similar to this, where the people are of this space, but originate from the flow. It is a self initiated reflection of emergence, each like a little reed resonating in the flow.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=22aK7uqzZEg

[DNA]

Posted by Paul (here)
MIT Technology Review has posted news of a stunning advancement in metallurgy, using fluctuating voltages on steel parts immersed in solutions of various metals to control the structure of metals on a nano-scale. The resulting metal components can be quite large, with finely controlled composition of various metals, yielding much stronger parts that are much more corrosion resistant.

From Nano-Manufacturing Makes Steel 10 Times Stronger (Technology Review):

Being as Damascus steel is as expensive as it is, can I expect my Samurai sword any time soon?