WADE FRAZIER : A Healed Planet

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

The medical racket is one of the most powerful on Earth, but, as I have shown, it has many facets, and the ignorance and naïveté of the masses is one of its key attributes, just like how FE is suppressed. The masses do almost all of the suppression, and organized suppression rarely needs to become very active or overt. People being cured by alternative treatments and naïve of why there would be any suppression is not nearly as stunning as people who choose certain death over imagining that there might be any suppression. If I had not witnessed it, I might not have believed it.

The secret of eternal life has been the focus of myth, speculation, and scientific research for millennia. Living on the physical plane, especially someplace like today's Earth, I have seen described by channeled entities as their closest idea to hell. Yes, when we finally wake up, not only will FE come into daily use by humanity, but fearing death, greed, and so on, will go the way of the dinosaur. People will have conscious and regular interaction with the other side, and just with FE and a healthy food supply (more than half will be fruit and vegetables), living to be 100 will be normal, and maybe there will be breakthroughs, spiritually and scientifically, so that living to be hundreds of years old will not be unusual. I think that that may well be the case.

On aging, it happens at the cellular level, with mitochondria and free radical production, which seems to be related to cellular division. Birds have more efficient mitochondria, which is related to the energy demands of flying, and it is almost certainly related to why they live so long, compared to mammals. Whether mammals can overcome those issues is kind of an open question to me.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

During my studies and investigations, I have encountered many hypotheses and theories about many events and dynamics. If you study the JFK hit, 9/11, and other such events, it becomes evident that not all the theories can be correct, if any of them really are, and sifting through them can be quite a chore. I had the good fortune to have Gary's testimony on that meeting a few weeks after the JFK hit, and I used it as my center of gravity for my JFK studies, as I compared all theories and evidence to Gary's reporting, and Gary's tale was never falsified, as far as I could tell. I spent a dozen years, on and off, looking at the JFK evidence, and especially how Gary's reporting compared to it, before I had anything to say about it publicly.

On the scientific front, there are also many areas that I have delved into, as I became familiar with the hypotheses and evidence. You really need to go deep to get a firm grasp on the subject matter, and one of the most important ideas that I try to get across in my work is the ideal of the scientific and scholarly process. The processes often fall short of the ideal, just as there has never been a truly free market, a democracy, a free press, and the like. That does not mean that the ideal is unworthy or invalid if pursued. Over the years, I have been approached by people who advocated positions that:

• The moon landings were faked;
• 9/11 was an inside job;
• JFK was killed in a conspiracy (or that he wasn't);
• Mainstream medicine does more harm than good, and that alternatives have promise;
• Technologically advanced civilizations have existed in the recent past, and such technologies were used to create the monumental architecture in ancient civilizations, from Egypt onward;
• That the Jewish Holocaust is largely a fiction;
• That Global Warming is a hoax;
• That Antarctica was ice free in historical times;
• That various alternative historical reconstructions are valid;
• That global catastrophes impacted the development of civilizations;
• There is an easy path to FE that has never been tried before, and if we just listened to the advocate's bright ideas, making FE happen would be easy;
• That we will never run out of oil;
• That ET civilizations visit Earth today and may have for a long time, and may even be responsible for the appearance of humanity on the evolutionary scene;
• That Godzilla is far more powerful, all-knowing, and meddlesome than I think;
• That the inventor of the hour has what it takes to make FE happen;
• That there is no mass extinction happening today, and that it is only a figment of the overactive imaginations of environmentalists and other doomsayers.

I could easily make that list run into dozens and dozens of positions, usually alternative, and I have looked into many of them. As I have stated many times, there is a mountain of chaff out there for every grain of wheat, and sifting through it can be highly laborious, but a great deal can be learned from the process. I think that everybody advocating alternative or even mainstream positions needs to go deep on the evidence, sharpen their tools of discernment, and go through the process of evaluating the evidence. If people are incapable of evaluating the evidence, then they really have no business advocating the positions, but I see it all the time, as various fringe authors gather their followings. I am going to show how I approached some of those subjects and how I came to think about those subjects today. I am going to go into some detail on them, to show how I approached the process, what evidence I considered, and how I came to my stance today. Some are very firm stances, others less so, but I will show what I think and why, and how I got there. It should be educational for some.

Time for chores.

Best,

Wade

[Ilie Pandia]

Speaking of:

That there is no mass extinction happening today, and that is only a figment of the overactive imaginations of environmentalists and other doomsayers.

Here is an interesting article: Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction

[Wade Frazier]

Thanks Ilie:

I read that a couple of days ago, and their results were highly conservative. Others have estimated up to 10,000 times the background rate, and using the conservative approach, they estimate that a 75% species extinction is "achievable," which would put it in the Big Six, and it could well reach Permian levels, which could take humanity with it. Brian's question is ever-more appropriate. I wrote long ago about how Mallove's magazine went steeply downhill after he was murdered, and not only did that issue laud the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide, it also denied all evidence that we were risking a mass extinction. With "allies" like that, FE does not need any enemies.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I was going to make a few posts on these related subjects, but will try to put them into one, and we will see how this goes.

As I have written, I stumbled into the Velikovsky controversy in 1995 and have been on the fringes of it ever since. Velikovsky made numerous bold claims, but I am not sure that even one of them is considered valid today. The idea that Venus is only several thousand years old and that it and Mars swung wildly through the solar system is not accepted by any professional scientist that I know of. In Velikovsky's imagination, those alleged agents of change were responsible for Bible stories such as parting the Red Sea and manna from Heaven, but again, no professional scientist or scholar takes those ideas seriously. Similarly, Velikovsky argued that those celestial events caused megafauna extinctions. That was all part of the corpus of catastrophic theory, and many authors of dubious distinction have promoted those ideas, including Graham Hancock.

One variant of catastrophic theory is the idea that there have been pole shifts in recent Earth history. Not shifts of the magnetic pole, which all scientists acknowledge, but shifts of the axis of rotation, which no scientist supports. Hancock and pals often used the work of Charles Hapgood, whose work was published before the science of plate tectonics was developed, which included fanciful interpretations of old maps. Back in the 1990s, I read scientific and scholarly analyses of the claims that Hancock and friends made (1, 2, 3). The catastrophists all invoked such events for the megafauna extinctions. There was a body of claims made by Hancock and crew that argued for catastrophic events, an ice-free Antarctica in historical times, and related ideas. The dissection of Hancock's claims continues in the 21st century (1, 2). By 2000, I had left such fringe claims behind, as I had serious reservations about them. As I performed the studies for my big essay, I was not undertaking them to assess those fringe claims. However, after I digested the state of the science and scholarship of many issues that were addressed in my essay, I sometimes looked back at those fringe claims. They were often ludicrous in light of the findings of scientists and professional scholars, and I will address some of them here.

Even though Velikovsky had Einstein's ear, Einstein never supported Velikovsky's wandering and young planet scenarios, and although Einstein endorsed Hapgood's pole-shift book, he also died before the science of plate tectonics developed. Einstein had an open mind, believed that even his theories would one day be "killed by a fact," but if he was alive today, he would not endorse Velikovsky's or Hapgood's ideas.

As I studied for my big essay, I became more familiar with the scientific findings around Earth's past. Earth has experienced ice ages and hothouse periods, as temperatures swung, which were primarily caused by atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. Carbon dioxide levels have fallen steeply from the Cambrian Period, and all models show a decline, beginning 100-150 million years ago, which was caused by a reduction in volcanism. After the anomalous increase in temperature about 56 million years ago, Earth has steadily cooled. There are several lines of evidence that support that cooling, such as the models that show the steady decline in carbon dioxide, the extinctions that accompanied Earth's transition from hothouse to icehouse conditions, to dropstones from Antarctic icebergs. No scientist today thinks that Antarctica was ice-free in modern times, and there is unanimous opinion that the Antarctic ice sheets are at least 15 million years old, and those dropstones and other evidence pushed back the beginning of the formation to about 35 million years ago, and the first Antarctic glaciers likely began forming nearly 50 million years ago, as Earth began cooling. When Hancock and friends invoke an ice-free Antarctica in historical times, due to some highly dubious interpretations of early maps, they are standing on very shaky ground. As far as I have seen, none of those fringe authors have dealt with the carbon dioxide levels, the Eocene extinctions, the dropstones, the lack of any evidence of shifts of Earth's axis of rotation (the well-known wobble is part of the Milankovitch cycles), and the like.

Similarly, Hancock and all catastrophists that I have encountered have argued that their putative events caused the megafauna extinctions. They have always obsessed over the mammoth extinctions, when it was only one of many megafauna extinctions. I have yet to see a disinterested scientist examine the megafauna extinction issue and fail to conclude that humans were primarily, if not solely, responsible for the megafauna extinctions. Those extinctions were really the first salvos of the Sixth Mass Extinction.

Among professional scientists, there is a faction that doggedly advocates climate change as being responsible for the megafauna extinctions, but not only do I not find their hypotheses and evidence compelling, but they all have conflicts of interest as they defend their in-group, humanity, and some climate change advocates seem to have political conflicts of interest, such as absolving the ancestors of Aboriginal Australians and Native Americans of those "achievements." If the climate change hypothesis fails to impress, the catastrophic hypothesis does not even come onto the radar, and no professional scientist takes the catastrophic hypothesis for the megafauna extinction events seriously.

Calling the ideas of Hancock and the catastrophists "hypotheses" is far too generous a term, as scientific hypotheses that any professionals take seriously deal with all the known evidence, while those advocating those fringe "hypotheses" cherry pick and misinterpret what catches their fancy and ignore or dismiss the evidence (with questionable logic) that falsifies their ideas. The work of Hancock, Menzies, the Velikovsky crew, and others is invalid, IMO, and while I tend to avoid terms such as "pseudoscientist" and "pseudoscholar," I definitely see why those labels are applied to those authors by professionals.

There is a world of difference between a Peter Ward, who is a professional scientist who works in interdisciplinary fashion and writes popular works for lay audiences, and authors such as Velikovsky, Hancock, Menzies, and the catastrophic authors that I have read. But lay audiences often cannot tell the difference and lap up those works of highly dubious validity, which partly comprise the mountain of chaff on the fringes, IMO.

Velikovsky and Sitchin literally interpreted ancient texts as the foundation of their grand yarns. Professional scientists and scholars find little reason to interpret any of those old texts literally. Scientists who have spent their careers investigating the lands of the Old Testament think that the Old Testament is based in a little bit of fact and a boatload of fantasy. I agree. We can get into why people want to literally interpret such ancient texts, such as being Baby Souls or being unduly influenced by them, but it is safe to say that such exercises are a poor method of seeking the truth, and usually serve to reinforce humanity's deep-seated delusions.

While writing at Avalon and elsewhere, recruiting for the choir and the like, I have regularly been approached by people who advocate the work of authors such as Cremo, Menzies, Velikovsky, Holocaust Deniers, the more way out ideas about 9/11 (nuclear weapons, no planes – those ideas have no compelling evidence to support them that I have seen), that the moon landings were faked, and so on. As far as I have seen, those advocates are scientifically illiterate and unable to sort the wheat from the chaff, or are unwilling to. When I let such people know that they need to either leave those ideas at the door or be prepared to rigorously defend them, those people disappear (or attack me).

I am anything but Mr. Establishment (I consider organized skepticism to be a criminal enterprise), but those in the choir need to exercise discernment. Otherwise, they go chasing down the rabbit holes, hacking at branches if they hack at all, doing nothing productive at all, and are in thrall to delusionary states. We won't help humanity turn the corner by dragging our delusions with us. We need to exercise keen discernment, and focus it at both orthodoxy and the fringes. My next post will be on Brian O's missteps and triumphs in his exploration of the fringes. I trod similar terrain in my adventures and studies.

Time for chores.

Best,

Wade

[Nine]

Wade,

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...Planet/page266

As I studied for my big essay, I became more familiar with the scientific findings around Earth's past. Earth has experienced ice ages and hothouse periods, as temperatures swung, which were primarily caused by atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. Carbon dioxide levels have fallen steeply from the Cambrian Period, and all models show a decline, beginning 100-150 million years ago, which was caused by a reduction in volcanism. After the anomalous increase in temperature about 56 million years ago, Earth has steadily cooled. There are several lines of evidence that

Really big picture stuff...

Among professional scientists, there is a faction that doggedly advocates climate change as being responsible for the megafauna extinctions, but not only do I not find their hypotheses and evidence compelling, but they all have conflicts of interest as they defend their in-group, humanity, and some climate change advocates seem to have political conflicts of interest, such as absolving the ancestors of Aboriginal Australians and Native Americans of those "achievements." If the climate change hypothesis fails to impress, the catastrophic hypothesis does not even come onto the radar, and no professional scientist takes the catastrophic hypothesis for the megafauna extinction events seriously.

and I see little of this on the net...

When I let such people know that they need to either leave those ideas at the door or be prepared to rigorously defend them, those people disappear (or attack me).

Wade, I have been reading spiritual stuff and so I am now more convinced than ever that energy comes before conscientiousness and yet I have no proof...

and so maybe the proper question is is this really the right question at all?

Maybe a better question to ask is how are they tied together and so that is what is so very difficult for me at least is how to tie it all together and as the conspirisists say ...connect the dots...

I am anything but Mr. Establishment (I consider organized skepticism to be a criminal enterprise), but those in the choir need to exercise discernment. Otherwise, they go chasing down the rabbit holes, hacking at branches if they hack at all, doing nothing productive at all, and are in thrall to delusionary states. We won't help humanity turn the corner by dragging our delusions with us. We need to exercise keen discernment, and focus it at both orthodoxy and the fringes. My next post will be on Brian O's missteps and triumphs in his exploration of the fringes. I trod similar terrain in my adventures and studies.

trouble is that many who put dots down tell faultless lies and so that is a conundrum....a problem with eye witness testimony...one should be cautious of such...

Of course one should always be open for a place in spirituality for the hero,s journey...

for my american palls ...hero's are not always whom you are used to...

however, I can not comment upon hero's since I do not know any except for my dear friend John who has Parkinson's disease and so his battle with this affliction has shown to me at least the total commitment to get better...

all of his treatments for this dread boomer desiese are banned...connect the dots...in the land of the brave and possibly the home of the free...

thanx Wade..

Nine

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

This will be on Brian's journey into the fringes. Mr. Mentor told me long ago that one of the greatest luxuries that a scientist can have is the freedom to be wrong. The need to be right is not only something born of the human ego and scarcity, but it also has set back many endeavors, including science. As Einstein said, every theory is wrong, and he expected that his theories would one day be killed by a fact, but that the best parts of his theories would be incorporated into the new theories. Only scientists as established and internally secure as an Einstein entertained the work of people such as Reich and Velikovsky. The rest are vying for tenure, scrapping to get papers published, seeking grant money, dreaming of Nobel prizes, and trying to look good.

Donald Canfield's mentor, Robert Berner, developed GEOCARBSULF, which models ancient oxygen and carbon dioxide levels, and Berner discouraged his younger colleagues from getting involved, as the risks of creating the model were so great that it could scuttle the career of less established scientists. Berner believed that the risk of being wrong and looking foolish was too great for the youngsters. When a scientist proposed testing Bell's inequality, which is a key test of quantum theory, Bell's first question to the scientist was if he had tenure. Such situations are a damning indictment of the scientific establishment, but are part of the reality.

Brian O was one of those more established scientists who decided to blaze trails on the fringes, and what an education it was. He had his mystical awakening performing the same exercise that I did, and he never really returned to the orthodox fold after that. He knew that the assumptions of materialism were false. Once you have direct personal experience of such realities, nobody can take your knowledge away from you. In a way, such experiences gave Brian the internal security to embark on his unorthodox path, and he walked it for the rest of his life.

Brian was a successful scientist before he even got his doctorate in astronomy, having scientific papers published in Science and Nature, which are the house organs of the scientific establishment, and his specialization on Mars led to his being picked as an astronaut and asked to go to Mars. Being a scientist-astronaut was about as high in the pecking order as one could get, but Brian wanted out after getting a taste. He then became an Ivy League professor at Carl Sagan's behest, and became something of an academic vagabond and NASA gadfly who also played the political game until that fateful day when he had his mystical awakening.

Brian still played in the big leagues, getting Buzz Aldrin a job and sharing an office with him, but his refusal to work on Reagan's Star Wars cost him his job and he permanently left the Establishment. Brian's mind was opened wide by his experiences, and he began his adventures on the frontiers of science. Robert Jahn had a department at Brian's old haunt at Princeton, which performed psychokenesis studies, and Brian began exploring the fringes. Brian did it with first-rate scientists such as Marcel Vogel and produced some of the same experimental results that I did, but he also began falling in with many in the fringe crowd who were, shall we say, less legitimate. Richard Hoagland sucked Brian into the Face on Mars issue. Brian has been repeatedly accused of concluding that the Face was artificial, but such people either never read Brian's papers and writings on the subject or they are being disingenuous. Brian always exercised a scientist's caution, and only said that the data was intriguing enough that when NASA went to Mars with better cameras, it should make the Face a targeting priority, and it did. I talked to Brian as he downloaded the image from the 1998 flyby, and he had already disassociated himself Hoagland's fanciful work on the "city" at the Face. Brian never wrote again about the artificiality of the Face again, to my knowledge, after the 1998 flyby.

Brian made several visits to Sai Baba over the years, but when he described his first visit, he noted that Sai Baba seemed unnaturally interested in what was under the cushion that he sat on. Some called Brian a Sai Baba devotee, and Brian cringed when they did that. Brian went to see Sai Baba's psychic feats, which may not have been psychic feats at all, but clever magician's tricks.

In early 2001, Brian was "ambushed" by a camera crew that stated that they wanted to interview him about the Face issue, but they were really there to elicit a statement from him on whether he thought that the Apollo moon landings were faked. Brian would regret those ten seconds on that Fox TV show for the rest of his life. Brian's rather tame statement of doubt became a political football for the rest of his life and beyond. A few months before he died, I had him write what truly became his last word on the subject, and I could not find one member of the faked moon landings milieu who would help me get it published so that Wikipedia's "editors" would stop erasing the link to the statement and thereby fraudulently keep the illusion alive that Brian was some big doubter of the moon landings, when he wasn't.

Brian had good reason to doubt the official stance on space matters, as he nearly lost his life at the hands of the USA's military when he snooped into the UFO issue, back in his early days of investigating the fringes. If Brian had done the work, he would have come to the same conclusion that I did: the faked moon landings evidence is weak-to-non-existent, and does not pass muster under deep and impartial scrutiny. But Brian did not have the luxury of voicing his opinions, however mild they might be, without repercussions, as his statements became a political football that many ran with.

The fringe area where Brian did the most work was around FE, as he traveled the world, visiting FE labs, rubbing shoulders with people such as Mark, and when I told him about my pal's underground exotic technology show, Brian nearly shrugged, as it was old hat to him. FE was always the heart of our relationship, from when I met him to his death. When he asked me to do his biographies, it was an honor, and I spent a lot of time doing homework, digging into periodical libraries, rereading his books, and the like. Brian always approached the fringes as a scientist, not a "believer" or "skeptic," and that entailed many missteps and being willing to be wrong, in the best spirit of scientists such as Einstein.

The Face on Mars, faked moon landings, and Sai Baba's allegedly divine abilities are areas where Brian arguably made missteps, but he always took a fairly conservative scientific stance. He traveled the world in his investigations and discovered that there was something to many fringe topics, mainly surrounding the nature of consciousness, and he wrote about it plenty in his later books. With the misses were hits, such as preventing rotting, psychokenesis, the USA's interest in UFOs, and the reality of FE and other exotic technologies. When Brian found a subject that did not pass muster with his investigations, he moved on, often the wiser, but also knowing that it came with exploring the fringes. Brian was also privy to many hard-to-believe experiences that I and other fringe people had, at the hands of the world's governments, Godzilla, and the like, and he barely survived their activities himself, which wrecked his health and shortened his life.

I wish that there were many more scientists like Brian, but very few have that kind of courage and integrity.

Best,

Wade

[Krishna]

Melinda,
This post is partly in response to #5278 about population statistics.
As Wade mentioned the world is going through demographic transition. Max Roser has created nice charts on this topic. Hans Rosling has a very good documentary DON'T PANIC — Hans Rosling showing the facts about population

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Another Twilight Zone moment in my life. I was looking at this Max Roser graph less than an hour ago.

Best,

Wade

[Limor Wolf]

Posted by Wade Frazier (here)
Hi:

Another Twilight Zone moment in my life. I was looking at this Max Roser graph less than an hour ago.

Best,

Wade

Hi Wade, One can't get enough good news.. It seems that the rewriting of history with a wave of a hand has began.

Or was it there all the time?

So quirky

[Nine]

Limor

Could you tell me how you feel about this?nine

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

As an FYI, that graph of war deaths was in relation to this article and this one. I have written about Uncle Ed's critique of Pinker's imperial valentine. The debates are worth digesting, IMO. As I discuss in my big essay, humanity is currently going through the Demographic Transition, as well as the Sixth Mass Extinction. Fuller called it the race between education and catastrophe.

The reason for "peace" between the Great Powers is that they all have nukes, and they know that a great power war likely means the end of global civilization. So, they exploit poor nations that cannot fight back. The USA has excelled in that Coward's War style, of using high-tech weaponry on peasants, increasingly from the safety of their keyboards, thousands of miles away.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I will provide a few examples of how I went about my work of study and writing on various topics, and a good example is one of my first essays, on Columbus. I first became aware of blemishes on the glory story I was taught from Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States, and the next year, 1992, I encountered David Stannard's American Holocaust, which was my big wakeup call on what the "settling" of the Western Hemisphere by Europe was really like. Before long, I was getting my hands on all manner of book on the subject. In 1997, when I began the full-time studies and writing that became my website today, I obtained all of the primary documents on Columbus's voyages that I could, and I have most of them in my personal library today, although I also heavily used the local public and university library systems, which are among the world's best. I have read all of the primary documents in existence, to my knowledge.

Primary documents are key tools for historians, and they obtain them whenever possible, and new works of history often come from fresh archival searches in musty buildings. But the bias of the historian often means more than the primary documents, as I discovered over the years. It again goes back to my journey's primary lesson. Pinker's imperial valentine is a good example of how academics can distort the information on behalf of their self-serving agendas, as they provide ideological service to the rich and powerful.

As somebody who was raised with the Columbus Myth, it was a shock to read the primary documents, even though I had already been radicalized and was ready for the message. Reading the casual mention of slaughtering vast numbers of people, feeding infants to dogs, and so on, is not for the faint of heart.

I also read many secondary and third-hand works, as various historians presented a synthesis of the primary and secondary documents, and I have watched the Columbus debates for the past generation. I have seen my essay used in many college and grade-school courses, and it seems to be the most scholarly Columbus essay on the Internet. It has been educational to see the debates, and my point is clear: why do we name a national holiday after the man? It has been enlightening to see how establishment defenders either ignore or attack work like mine, as they either purposely or irrationally miss the point of my essay. Many of the logical fallacies that I note in my critics essay were evident in the Columbus debates, as establishment defenders plied their trade.

Another area would be my medical writings. The oldest part of my site today is Ralph Hovnanian's Medical Dark Ages quotes, which I transcribed around 1992. My fluoridation essay is, along with my Columbus essay, the oldest on my site, first written in about 1998. I first wrote it like a geek chemist, moved the chemistry section to the end, and during the study for my big essay I improved the chemistry a little, getting into the details of enzyme structure and function a little more, and why the fluoride ion is so toxic. The fluoride situation is a great example of how vested interests can corrupt basic issues of science, and the political-economic aspects of fluoridation are very evident in that essay, which I see linked to from anti-fluoridation sites all the time. I have probably seen more links to that essay than to any of my essays, over the years. It has also generated all manner of comment and even strange behavior, as people get their boats rocked. Poison as medicine; Orwell's nightmare has come true, and 1984 was published a couple of years after the fluoridation campaign began in the USA, and the campaign was literally designed by one of history's greatest propagandists who helped addict American women to tobacco.

As with Columbus, reading the arguments pro and con, and going deep on the evidence, were critical, and took years of examination, and pretty much all of the subjects that I write about on my site I keep up on, to one degree or another. I might go years without looking at the Columbus or fluoridation evidence, but then some link to my site or my daily reading material will touch on it, and then I find myself reviewing the evidence and arguments again.

I doubt that my basic conclusions about Columbus and fluoridation will ever change, which are:

• Columbus was a greedy, mass-murdering thief, and not somebody worthy of becoming some kind of role model of exploration or "discoverer," and who initiated the greatest demographic catastrophe in the history of our species.
• The fluoride ion is a well-known poison, which is used today in biology labs to poison enzymes, and while even fluoride's promoters acknowledge its poisonous effects and that it even crumbles teeth, they assert that that well-known poison is good for us at nearly the levels where harm is universally acknowledged. It is the smallest window of health benefit/detriment in the history of "medicine." It also turns out that all of the prominent promoters of fluoridation had conflicts of interest, and sometimes mind-boggling ones.

Another area where I many spent years looking at the evidence and arguments was the moon landings. My introduction to what may have been awry with the official story was Moongate, which I read around 1991, which argued that the Moon had higher gravity than popularly presented, and that exotic technology such as antigravity was used to land on the Moon. By 1998, the Moongate Hypothesis had collapsed for me, but I found myself sucked into the faked moon landings milieu, beginning in 1993 or so, and I read works that argued that we never landed on the moon for several years, on and off, before I decided to get to the bottom of the issue in early 2001. Just as I began to go deep, Brian was on national TV, saying that the Moon landings could have been faked, and then I saw no way out of getting to the bottom of it, and over the next several months I did, with a little help from my friends, although I took some missteps (and glad that I did, as going down a rabbit hole and digging yourself out can be very educational). I satisfied myself that the Moon landings happened as popularly presented, with probably some UFO activity covered up.

In the years since 2001, when I got satisfied about the reality of the Moon landings, I have been regularly approached by people who advocate faked moon landings, but all that they do is recycle the same old "evidence" that I examined long ago, and there is nothing there to support the faked Moon landings idea, as far as I have seen. Yes, NASA's PR department played fast and loose in the editing room, and photos were cropped and otherwise altered, but original images are available, and what the PR people did is easy to discern. It has been gradually dismaying to watch newbies continually disappear down that rabbit hole, and they try to drag me there with them. That dogged nature, of chasing after phantoms, and a complete inability to assess the evidence, is why we still have a Flat Earth Society. Just last week, a pal told me of a close friend who thinks that Earth may well be flat. No joke. That kind of conspiracism is a disease of the mind and spirit.

Another conspiratorial area that I went deep on is the JFK hit, but I got involved because of what Gary Wean reported, and he has total credibility with me, as far as reporting what he experienced. As with the Apollo Moon landings and other subjects, I examined the evidence, on and off, for a dozen years before I had anything to say about it, and Gary's testimony has never been falsified that I could see, and events in the subsequent years have powerfully confirmed his story. John Kennedy was killed in a conspiracy that was covered up at the highest levels of government. You can take that to the bank. But even though he did good work on the backyard photos, Jack White soon demonstrated that he was in way over his head when he began to analyze Apollo lunar photos. I never saw even one of his Apollo analyses that was valid, and it eventually became embarrassing to witness, and he also launched into the 9/11 fray, and Jim Fetzer's stuff was so way out and undiscerning that I have to wonder if he is on some kind of special assignment, muddying the waters, such as his arguments that the Boston Marathon bombings never really happened, just like conspiracists said that the Sandy Hook shootings never happened. A pal had somebody close to him who was in that Sandy Hook school when the shooting happened, but was in a higher grade than those dead children, so he survived.

The 9/11 issue is indicative of how conspiracists hyperventilate over nothing, and all sorts of conspiracist rabbit holes await the unwary and undiscerning, and I see them disappear into them all the time. The bottom line is that almost all 9/11 conspiracy theories are false; they can't all be right. Like the JFK hit, we will likely never get to the bottom of what happened, as the American government likely has a vested interest in not getting to the bottom of it, at least publicly, but all manner of grand yarn has been spun about 9/11 on the flimsiest of evidence.

My next post, maybe today, will be about various areas of science and technology that I have either been involved with or examined, and how I went about it.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Here is a post on digging into scientific and technological issues. My introduction, other than my scientific training almost from infancy, was Mr. Mentor's engine, and I began to grasp its significance when I was 16. My second significant one, other than Mr. Mentor's many inventions, was Dennis's heat pump. As I have written, I spent a long time studying thermodynamics, particularly related to their inventions, after I staggered out of my home town, radicalized. I recently added a little essay to further discuss Dennis's heat pump, and in nearly 20 nearly continuous years on the Internet, I have yet to see or have even one intelligent conversation on why Dennis's heat pump is the best that has ever been on the world market, or why Mr. Mentor's engine was hailed as the world's best for powering an automobile. The inventors of that heat pump literally cut their performance data in half so that engineers would stop laughing at their "impossible" performance. That is the identical mindset that saw establishment science ignore and ridicule the Wright brothers for five years after they first flew. Soon before Brian O died, he said that the blindness and denial of establishment science is worse in the early 21st century than in the early 20th.

You don't have to be a rocket scientist to understand how those technologies worked, and there is nothing unorthodox in the slightest for explaining how they worked and got such high performance. I have seen those kinds of complaints about other issues, where the people who use the Internet are either incapable or unwilling to have even the tamest of conversations about important issues, where ideas and data can be intelligently discussed in technical and scientific terms. It really is mystifying. I am not trying to show anybody up, but nobody approached me to have that kind of discussion, other than trolls and professional skeptics who cannot string two honest and rational thoughts together. It really is a strike against my choir idea, when almost nobody seems capable or interested in having honest, intelligent, and informed discussions of the most important subjects on Earth. Building the choir is going to be a long, hard process, but I am prepared for it.

Those are issues of orthodox science and technology, and I am OK with skepticism that marrying Dennis's heat pump and Mr. Mentor's or Victor Fischer's engine could produce FE, but many scientists have advocated that such an approach could work. Technologies that defy the "laws of physics" are going be more contentious, and that includes all FE technology, the Brown's Gas applications such as transmuting radioactive materials, and Rife's and Naessens's microscopes. Sparky Sweet and James Gilliland's pal Max did not really know why their FE technologies worked, but only knew that they did, similar to Brown's Gas and those amazing microscopes with their "impossible" optical resolutions. Sparky wrote a paper on the physics of his FE gizmo, and making time run backwards is part of its trick. The bottom line is that orthodox theory cannot explain how any of those technologies work, but it was that way for all big breakthroughs like that. The Michelson-Morley experimental results were not satisfactorily explained until Einstein's special theory of relativity came along a generation later.

What my pal was shown turns today's physics texts into doorstops, and mainstream scientists predictably do not like hearing it, in their denial. Don't look to places such as Wikipedia for answers to those enigmas. The energy and medical rackets are Earth's most powerful, and public venues such as Wikipedia are worse than worthless on topics that can upend those rackets. I have read multiple attacks on Naessens and his findings, dismissing him as a fraud, without any mention of his microscope and its findings. That would be like dismissing the Wright brothers without ever mentioning their airplanes. Those kinds of critiques are openly fraudulent, and it seems that such critics do not expect their audience to exercise any rational ability. It really is something to witness attacks like those, or all the Big Lies that people in the FE field regularly tell about Dennis (1, 2, 3).

It would be nice to see some kind of honest, intelligent, and informed discussion of those issues, even by "skeptics," but they virtually do not exist on the Internet. My choir is partly intended to host such discussions.

Time for chores.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Quickly, before I go to bed, today is the 65^th anniversary of the beginning of the Korean War. William Blum's account is the one worth reading, on why it happened, not the propaganda that I saw in the mainstream media today. It was just one of many American imperial wars that have been waged since my great nation was founded.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Quickly, before I go hiking, there is nothing quite like watching working technology to get a good idea of its reality. As I have written about plenty, many technological advances were derided as "impossible" and "idiotic" even after they were publicly demonstrated, and to this day, orthodox science cannot explain how many cutting-edge technologies work, and that ignores what is in Godzilla's Golden Hoard, which turns the physics texts into doorstops.

In order to truly become a useful member of the choir, people need to get familiar enough with the evidence and milieu to understand that organized suppression is real, to get familiar enough with those exotic technologies that are publicly available to satisfy themselves to their reality, but they also need to avoid getting sucked into the conspiracist trap, which can be very seductive. It is far from an easy tightrope to walk, and the keys to attaining productive understandings of the issues I have laid out in detail. Again, a mystical awakening was common to all of my fellow FE travelers, but I doubt it is required. But without it, people tend to become materialistic, and materialists tend to deny that FE is possible (although they may see it as desirable), they tend to deny that organized suppression exists, and they tend to think like victims and advocate coercion, none of which are compatible with the choir.

Best,

Wade

[Krist]

Wade,
I would like to have a conversation about that heat pump and Mr Mentor's engine....I have been thinking about that valve or pressure regulator,you will have to help me with where that diagram is you posted for us, cant remember where that is in all this info.
When we do talk about that I don't know you will find my level of tech on the subject as intelligent,but it would be honest.
Why I have not asked many useful questions as of yet is because I too am working 12 to 16 hours a day .I fall asleep studying and wake to study a bit before I'm off again.This is no complaint...I was conditioned from birth to work this world the way I'm doing it now,fortunately for me there is a demand for my skilled labor.Although it has been hot as hell early this year.
I get caught up fallowing the blue highlights into your big essay and never have enough time to digest before we are on to the next discussion lol.
fell asleep reading about the damn mammoths and how we may have hunted them to death.That had me thinking about the mentality of my redneck brothers who think if the **** hits the fan that they are going to hunt and fish and shoot zombies to survive.Now Ive been that redneck hunter type all this life but as of the last 10 years or so ,may be since I learned to meditate and have discovered new info and the likes my focus has changed drastically.Survive was the key word there Wade,I have been raised in fear and survival mode.So ,and my family is very proud of my efforts,I work my ***off to bring down the energy.
I'm currently operating a D-6 dozer with a six way hydraulic blade building a pond and earth works for water retention.Those days on the farms in the Midwest come in handy for my life now.I saw what erosion does to the land after industrial farming and have some understanding of how to avoid it.My understanding of how to use hydraulics from those early years brings me praise on the machines from my brothers in arms.Lol I get praise for something I learned as a kid and get paid for it!
So I have a simple understanding of Hydraulics and I have a type II certification to handle freon.Yeah I could install one of those heat pumps,and understand how it works .Trying to find the time and words to engage you Wade is another issue,at least here.As most every thing I know and learn has been from the field not the books or me writing back and forth in this manor.
So many of you intelligent folks would laugh at how long it took me to formulate this post...
I have said it here before, the info is heavy for me most of the time and so is the reading.I'm grounded...so much so that there will be a shovel and pick in my hands today ,it'll be 105 degrees today and my crew will need some motivation from me to keep moving forward when mother nature says "not without me ".
Time to go .
Best ,Krist

[Nine]

Wade,

The moon landings were faked;
9/11 was an inside job;
JFK was killed in a conspiracy (or that he wasn't);
Mainstream medicine does more harm than good, and that alternatives have promise;
Technologically advanced civilizations have existed in the recent past, and such technologies were used to create the monumental architecture in ancient civilizations, from Egypt onward;
That the Jewish Holocaust is largely a fiction;
That Global Warming is a hoax;
That Antarctica was ice free in historical times;
That various alternative historical reconstructions are valid;
That global catastrophes impacted the development of civilizations;
There is an easy path to FE that has never been tried before, and if we just listened to the advocate's bright ideas, making FE happen would be easy;
That we will never run out of oil;
That ET civilizations visit Earth today and may have for a long time, and may even be responsible for the appearance of humanity on the evolutionary scene;
That Godzilla is far more powerful, all-knowing, and meddlesome than I think;
That the inventor of the hour has what it takes to make FE happen;
That there is no mass extinction happening today, and that it is only a figment of the overactive imaginations of environmentalists and other doomsayers.

I have been thinking about all those issues at one time or another and so one must have a boundary of a search area or one would become useless just for the sake of the search and so to be productive one must narrow....or focus upon the very big picture which is the energy issue...

All just a personal opinion and so to focus one must limit what one can possibly read upon the internet that is just a circus or a performance and get to the really really big picture.

http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/O/overexposure.html

Over exposure to information is to me the same as an over exposed camera ...to much light in that situation...when the film box got opened to early....

http://www.npr.org/2014/05/22/314592...t-our-memories

That article above was so interesting about the nature of digital photography and memory and what memory actually is and so you are most fortunate in your great gift in that area.

I have a huge digital library of my first child and with the second child I have very little yet the little I have is of really important stuff...

She made the video of her 18th birthday since I was not up to the task...and my pictures were the best since they were art and provoked the most memories...

Wade Frazier is the best that I have ever seen of just about anywhere on the idea in the information age of information over exposure and one must learn to be his/her own filter....as it were...

thanx Wade

much gratitude for your work on this blog...


Nine

[Servant Limestone]

Hi:

Reading Uncle Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States is a big wake up call for me in believing in the lie of the liberal-conservative divide in American politics.

http://www.historyisaweapon.com/zinn...eshistory.html

What really struck me is this part of the book that Uncle Noam talked about before that the liberals that I've believed before can really think of such a thing as a crisis in the governability of the "democratic" systems and of course, the purpose of the Trilateral Commission.

http://www.historyisaweapon.com/defc...nnseven20.html

And of course, the bipartisan consensus.

http://www.historyisaweapon.com/defc...ncarebu21.html

I've been lied to by the supposed greatness of the Carter administration's actions with Reagan destroying it, even if we can consider how great a person Jimmy Carter can be personally or even Bill Clinton. It's part of a political consensus. Even of figures like Hubert Humphrey. I thought I knew enough about them.

Of course, we all know how history is always written. But I never really understood the statement, "History was written by the victors", according to Winston Churchill, until I've read about Uncle Howard's work. It further chipped away from my previous worldview about the innate greatness of the United States and its actions, even if they end up badly, is supposed to be actions out of good intentions. I was so wrong.

Interestingly, it gave me an entirely different perspective about those who believe in conservative principles, though I sympathize more with those who affiliate with the Old Right than the New Right Buckley-Goldwater version of "conservatism", which is more of being a "ultranationalistic radical statist military Keynesian" than being conservative.

http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/1992----.htm
http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/19960211.htm

The Old Right knows their conservatism far better. I remember watching in Youtube the 2008 third party debate with Chris Hedges as moderator and the presidential candidate of the Constitution Party can say loud and clear that corporations are not persons.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Baldwin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmZpSCMBy4k

This "liberal-conservative" political divide also gave me a greater understanding about the regional business-financial blocs that define the differences of the Republicans and Democrats which Uncle Noam calls as the two factions of the "Business Party". It's indeed an enlightening experience as I've discussed in my life journey posts before.

Thanks,

SL

Edited: Uncle "Howard Zinn" is who I meant, not Uncle Ed Herman. I tend to confuse the two of them. I apologize.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Yesterday, I hiked this, and the old man is feeling it this morning. It is one of the premier day hikes in the Cascade Range, which means it is one of the premier day hikes on Earth. From forest to lush meadows to rocks, snow, and spectacular views, that hike has it all, and because I did it during the week, I encountered one person on the way up.

Hi Nine:

In order to develop a comprehensive perspective, the aperture has to be wide, but also discerning. Scientific literacy is not just about all the facts of science, but how things work. When that information is part of a way of viewing the world, it is easier to digest, but there are also hazards to paradigmatic thinking, and this is where integrity comes in: to be willing to relinquish what we think we know. Not many are willing or able to do that. Experience is the key component to making sense of it all, not surfing the Internet or playing armchair academic. If you think about that, it also aligns with what I think is needed to be in the choir.

Hi SL:

You meant to write "Uncle Howard" in that post

As Bucky Fuller said, all political systems are about who gets the benefit of the limited economic production. FE and abundance makes all of today's political-economic ideologies meaningless. Politics and "protests" are not solutions at all.

To all:

More posts coming this weekend.

Best,

Wade