WADE FRAZIER : A Healed Planet

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Ilie, that is nice thinking in your post. Yes, the way the energy is carried is important, whether it is a photon or electron streaming through space, or the photons released in the process known as combustion, as that solar energy trapped by photosynthesis is released back to space (and your meal "gets in the way" and is cooked).

Those enzyme animations show how like an engine some biological energy generation structures are, so they are not all that far from heat engines, although they take advantage of electric potential instead of the heat of combustion. Yes, no biological structure runs like a steam engine, probably because the heat would be too high for organic molecules to withstand and remain stable. So, they run on electric potential, which is boosted by captured photon energy, and ambient photon energy heats up the environment and biological structures so that the reactions of life are easier to attain. FYI, those protons used for generating energy (ATP) can also be used to generate heat (think of it like an electric heater), and that is what endomorphs like us do.

Fixing carbon is important, but what is really the most important for a heterotroph is harvesting the electron potential energy captured from the Sun by the autotrophs. Some Archaeans can capture photon energy, but they can't fix carbon, so your answer is close. Only bacteria can do that, and even in complex life, the energy centers (mitochondria and chloroplasts) are descended from captured bacteria. That energy is "invested" in making the bonds that fix carbon. True photosynthesis captures photons and fixes carbon, and oxygenic photosynthesis splits water to get its electrons, which was a neat trick and saved the ocean and, hence, life on Earth.

These kinds of discussions will help "seat" the material in my big essay, and I highly encourage them. There are hundreds of such understandings to attain to get to the comprehensive perspective that I think will be needed for the choir to hit the notes. I have heard my work called a "tsunami" of information, but it is not a tsunami for tsunami's sake. It all fits together, believe it or not, as people who are able and willing to digest it can see the bigger picture of what is happening on Earth today, and energy is central, as always. As aspiring choir members digest the information and began weaving the framework of perception that my work encourages, they will begin to see the forest from the trees, understand the preeminent role that energy plays, and we may able to get something done!

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

It is great that Ilie is wrestling with the concepts of energy at the microscopic level. Highly important understandings can come from the process. What happens in cells is a miracle of biological equipment and chemistry, but the capture of energy makes it all possible, and even with chemosynthetic organisms, the Sun is the ultimate author of the feast. Splitting water and tearing hydrogen atoms apart, and then using the electrons and protons to power biological machinery, fix carbon, oxygenate the atmosphere, and the like are pretty mind-boggling processes, and anybody can be forgiven for thinking that it is not all some big accident. Einstein didn’t think so, either.

Invoking a sense of wonder about our world is one of the key goals of my work. Wrecking life on Earth in the name of ego and greed is insane, but that is humanity's trajectory today, and I am doing what I can to change the course.

Time to go to work.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

The situation in Greece is curious and a little ominous. It could easily devolve into civil war and NATO "peacekeeping." Hell, the USA bombed the Balkans not too long ago, in pursuit of its geopolitical agenda. We will see how this plays out, but it obviously has big implications for Europe.

Best,

Wade

[Krishna]

Posted by Ilie Pandia (here)
In my mind, energy is energy! And these names of "chemical energy", "solar energy", "potential energy", "kinetic energy", "activation energy" sometimes seem arbitrary distinctions and I find them confusing. I wish they just said ENERGY and say its VALUE in Joules and be done with that.

Things start to get fuzzy when you go atomic or sub-atomic level. As I have said, it's not exactly clear in my mind what's the difference between Sun's energy ("radiated photos") and "heat" (or thermal energy).

There are many forms of energy but what matters to life is how can life exploit it for its own purposes.

Here sometimes it needs to be in a specific form like biochemical energy. Or sometimes just basking in sun is good enough, sometimes it is thermal currents for birds to ride on. All of them might have their own uses for different species.

The other part is storage, so that it can be used at a different place than where it is created e.g. create organic carbon in leaves and use in roots
Or at a different time winter vs summer.

Finally it is not just energy that matters it is the difference in energy that matters more, life cant extract work out of things that have same energy levels. There needs to be a difference.

[Nine]

Hi Wade,

These kinds of discussions will help "seat" the material in my big essay, and I highly encourage them. There are hundreds of such understandings to attain to get to the comprehensive perspective that I think will be needed for the choir to hit the notes. I have heard my work called a "tsunami" of information, but it is not a tsunami for tsunami's sake. It all fits together, believe it or not, as people who are able and willing to digest it can see the bigger picture of what is happening on Earth today, and energy is central, as always. As aspiring choir members digest the information and began weaving the framework of perception that my work encourages, they will begin to see the forest from the trees, understand the preeminent role that energy plays, and we may able to get something done!

That statement was so huge in my opinion as all things are on the table with free energy!!!

Wade, my learning style can be random but with a purpose and so I look back at what you post to try to understand and so you tell the truth about your studies and so I am studying so many things at once it sometimes is hard to focus upon the big picture.

Yet, now it is so much easier to do so and so it is again Tuesday nite...

that day of that crazy bicycle ride ....

I choose to ride with that "A" group. What is that? The club that I cycle with is a racing club. And we divide our ride into groups based upon cycling skill with fast cycling as the goal but with a more important goal of efficient fast cycling.
Many times being the strongest cyclist is not enough to win a race and so the intelligent students of the sport learn tactics. Or in order to win a race when is the optimum time to apply power?

I forgot most of that since I quit racing over 20 years ago and so cycling as I am describing is about the tour De France and the bikes that professional bicycle racers ride and about a huge culture that has grown around this sport of the up and coming executives in America and the UK.

Cycling is the new Golf

I hear all kinds of cool stuff that is going on upon our planet through this club. It is a happening place sad to say....or maybe just the human condition?

I lasted about 19 miles on our 43 mile outing tonight with that "A" group. It was not my fitness or my bicycle technology but my tactics. You see in this cycling club finishing the ride with the "A" group is the race. And so I thought about that when I figured it out and felt how stupid it all was yet many take these things very very seriously.

I am very perceptive of these types of things and so I learned many lessons upon this ride. Wade, I will tell you sometime why I am doing this ride but not now. And, I hope when your choir fires up that I can at least read about what goes on upon that site of yours! Big picture stuff seems to be filled with little picture stuff....but with just a little something added and that I have not figured out yet...

Wade that dick head guy on that 20000 dollar bike would get his arse handed to him in a real race. Real racing is going on on our tuesday nite ride...

Golf will never be cycling as far as understanding the energy game...

thanx Wade..

Nine

[Servant Limestone]

Hi:

The situation in Greece will actually define the future of the European integration project so we'll have to look very closely at what might happen there. Based on a video I've watched lately in Youtube from a news coverage by RT, it's in a very strategic position very near the Kurds, who are now busy fighting the Islamic State of the Levant and are in the middle of their own Zapatista like social revolution in Rojava. Hmmm.... Interesting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rojava
https://www.dissentmagazine.org/onli...tion-in-rojava

Chris Hedges, in his latest article, We are All Greeks Now, wrote about the similarities of the economic breakdown in Greece to what's already happening in the United States.

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/...s_now_20150712

I've actually asked Uncle Noam about the Rojava revolution a few days back and I'll write his exact response here. I don't think he'll mind. In fact, I told him that I'll help spread the word in donating money for the Kurdish case and he said "Good luck". So, this is the letter asking for financial help for the people of Rojava and Uncle Noam is one of the signatories.

http://kurdishquestion.com/index.php...eeds-help.html

This is Uncle Noam's response about my question:

From "Noam Chomsky" Thu Jul 2 16:34:30 2015
X-Apparently-To: (deleted) Thu, 02 Jul 2015 16:34:33 +0000


"I think it’s important to support the Rojava communities. I have been most interested in reports of what is happening there, and have sought to verify them with highly experienced correspondents who have worked in the region for years and would be very sympathetic, but without any luck so far."

Well, I've asked him if he is receiving reports there and have some contacts and his response is out of that question of mine.

Of course, I know that the situation of Rojava and Greece is not that strongly related to the cause of bringing FE to the world, which has to come from an abundance based mentality, not an austerity one just as I've learned before and written about. Again, that hated word, austerity. But I can't help but admire the Syrian Kurds and the Greeks.

https://rojavareport.wordpress.com/t...va-revolution/

I'll give you an animated music video by the rock band, Pearl Jam, of the song "Do the Evolution" from their 1998 album "Yield". It just tells you about what humanity has been doing for quite some time on this little corner of our universe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDaOgu2CQtI

So enjoy being depressed watching that video! Hahaha.

Thanks for reading,

SL

Edited: Damn, I've posted my personal email with my name on it. Hahaha. I quickly deleted it when I realized what I've done. Hahahaha. I also deleted Uncle Noam's email just to even it out but you can all find out about it easily in the web. 1 guest and 2 members currently seeing the thread. But I can only see my account and that 1 guest so I don't know who is the other member? I'm always puzzled about that. I frequently encounter this. 2 members but I can only see "Servant Limestone" and not the other one. By the way, Who is the guest and/or that other member that possibly saw the email? (Hopefully not...) Hmmm... Who knows if somebody saw it....Well, well. Sorry about that rant. I was just shocked about what I just did.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Quickly, before it is off to work, I am going to expand a little on the people I seek. It is based on more than forty years of experience and interaction in the energy issue. I have written about it a little before, and will expand on it a little here. As I have also written, first, a person needs to care. Without that, the rest does not matter. As that link also notes, they have to have been awakened in some manner. A mystical awakening may not be required, but very few that I respected in the FE field did not have one. And as I also wrote at that link, the person either has to have some scientific literacy before encountering my work, or they can develop it through digesting my work. My big essay was written with that in mind. For the people I seek, they will recognize my work as something different, and they will dive in and not come up for air for months. David Hughes is that way, after Brian O exhorted him to read my work. Ilie has been reading my work for nearly five years, and as you can see in recent posts, he is still wrestling with the energy concepts that I present. That is very good work, but shows how hard this work really is. It is not for quick study artists. My work is not some New Age or conspiracist flavor of the day.

The social circle approach will not work for this. What I need is not people networking with their social circles, but I need to them to do the work and learn to sing. The singing is what is going to attract more of the people I seek, not networking. I have thrown my line in with the rad left and free software movements, for instance, and there is member one of each at Avalon today (SL and Freeknowledge), but I don't expect to attract many others from those milieus, although I may throw my line in there a little more. All groups have their ideological commitments to scarcity and survival, and my work is about abundance, and those mired in scarcity and survival simply cannot see it. They may read the words, but it won't sink in.

I wrote quite a few short essays since 2003, to make it easier to introduce my work, and I even made a PowerPoint (with help from a scientist pal) that boils down the Epochal Events into a short summary, to make it easy for people to do some fishing, but if the people do not respond with enthusiasm, go deep, and do not come up for air in a while, they are not who I am looking for. I am OK with skepticism, caution, and almost everybody will come to my work with a fair helping of naïveté, but naiveté can be cured, and skepticism and caution, in the right doses, is a virtue.

I continually receive responses that people are too busy to digest my work, as they hack at their favorite branch and ignore the root. I am not interested in spending much time with them, to help them understand that there is a root. I have yet to see one of those people be who I seek.

It is off to work, and I may write more about this soon.

Best,

Wade

[Krishna]

Wade,
I read that Genghis Khan and his rise had something to do with climate change. Do you know anything about it?
Also with Mr. Mentor engine what was the efficiency that was expected? I assume it could use natural gas as well
as petrol (gas is USA)?
Also I have been reading Peter Ward's books Flooded Earth, Under a Green Sky, Out of thin Air, Medea Hypothesis,
The Life and Death of Planet Earth it is fascinating reading helps understand your essay better, and also understand
the possible worst case poisoning of life by hydrogen sulfide because of global warming.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Briefly, before I hit the hay after a long day, the Kurds have been sold out by the West several times, and I wish them the best, but my work is also about ending ethnicity. It is a powder keg over there, and the USA is taking a blow torch to it.

Yes, Freeknowledge, I wrote about the possible environmental causes and impacts of the brief Mongol reign. Ward's books are great for lay audiences, which is partly why I cite them as much as I do in my big essay. Humanity has its toes over the edge of the abyss on many fronts.
Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

This is another post on what I seek, and it will segue into Freeknowledge's recent post. He has been reading my work for more than a decade, and long ago he read Chris Bryson's magnum opus on fluoridation, The Fluoride Deception. He was speechless after reading it. Darren recently read Wrangham's Catching Fire, and next up is Mann's 1491. Since Ilie encountered my work in 2011, he regularly reads books that I mention.

Freeknowledge is now reading a bunch of Peter Ward's books. I have nine of Ward's books. Ward wrote them partly as a labor of love, and partly to help him get over the death of his colleague during a pirate encounter. I once read an interview with Ward in which he said that writing those books did nothing for his career. Universities and scientific organizations do not care about scientists writing for the lay audience. Only scientific papers matter, on the writing front. In his latest books, it was obvious that Ward was rushed and could have used an editor. There is not much money in publishing books, and it drove Brian O into bankruptcy. I have many author pals, and writing is a hard way to make a living and partly why I will never publish my work in book form. Back in 2001, I decided to make my work Internet-only, but am continually badgered to publish a book. Only older readers do that. My work is a next-gen resource.

What those guys are doing, reading my sources, is exactly what I am trying to inspire with my work, but more than that, I want them to then discuss those books with me on my threads. The discussions will be important for helping develop comprehensive perspectives, which is what the choir is all about. I am still waiting to have chapter discussions of my big essay, but Ilie's recent energy posts are coming close. Deep discussion of the material will help make the connections that lead to comprehensive perspectives. Surfing the Internet and watching YouTube videos is easy to do, but it falls short of what is needed for developing comprehensive perspectives. It took a lifetime of training, adventures, and study for me to develop my perspective and write my big essay. Developing comprehensive perspectives is not easy, but the fruits are not only very rewarding on a personal level: such comprehensive thinkers can help humanity turn the corner. We are a long ways from being out of the woods.
Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Briefly, before I head out to work, Ilie's recent energy posts, as he grapples with the concepts, is good work. Krist's posts on Dennis's heat pump and Mr. Mentor's engine is good work, and Freeknowledge's energy observations are good work. To his latest, energy is, in its essence, motion, and motion does not happen when things are in equilibrium. As Freeknowledge noted, harnessing energy gradients is the trick that life and humanity plays, whether it is capturing photons in photosynthesis, bears catching salmon, or humans making their own gradients by liberating stored energy, such as making a fire. The more energy-centric we can view activities on Earth (energy makes them all happen), the more we are on the way to seeing our world with comprehensive eyes.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

To my previous post on the good study that people are doing, scientific literacy can go a long ways to understanding how our world works, and you can begin to assess various issues for yourself. I plan to make a series of posts on this theme, and I'll start with trace elements and modern medical science.

If you review this table, you can see that the human body is almost entirely comprised of light elements. The heavier elements are largely metals, and they play critical roles as electron donors. They are generally held in place in what are called porphyrins, the iron of hemoglobin, the magnesium of chlorophyll, and other key trace metals are held this way, in safe cages, so that they are carefully controlled and used. The metals play key roles in biology, but you won’t find heavier metals used much at all, and they are generally poisonous. Mercury and lead are two of the most notorious heavy metals, partly because they have been used so much by humans. The toxic effects of lead have been known since ancient times, but industrially funded laboratories in the 20th century gave lead a clean bill of health, to justify putting it in gasoline. Mercury was incredibly used as "medicine," and you can find it in vaccines to this day. The entire foundation of vaccination is highly suspect, and putting mercury in vaccines is just more of the surreal "science" that vested interests concoct. The same lab that gave lead the green light (funded by industrial interests, including automotive), also gave the green light to aluminum, and perhaps most notoriously, fluorine.

Fluorine is the most reactive element known to science, and it is almost never used by life forms, except by plants to make them poisonous, so that animals do not eat them. In order to understand fluorine's toxicity, it is very helpful to understand oxygen's role in biochemistry. Oxygen is a distant second place to fluorine's electronegativity, and oxygen is quite the double-edged sword. Its use allowed organisms to create highly energetic reactions, without which complex life would not exist as we know it, but using oxygen also comes with a high price, as it created free radicals. It was not until a photosynthesizer (likely a single organism) learned to split water, and oxygen was the waste byproduct, that complex ecosystems could be based on oxygenic respiration.

Fluorine is just too energetic for use in biochemistry, and there is not much of it on Earth, either, not like water. Also, if you study how nitrogen is captured and used by life forms, you can see the brute force used by bacteria to "fix" nitrogen. Liberating fluorine is immensely harder, and there is not much of it available, and fluorine is universally poisonous. Again, no animals use fluorine, and plants only use it to make themselves poisonous, but fluorine was another industrial element that created toxic waste, and the same industrially funded laboratory that gave lead and aluminum the green light was at the forefront of making fluorine not only appear harmless, but good for us, so it is compulsorily added to my water supply today. It is surreal, but it largely passes in silence to this day in orthodox medical circles, and those who challenge pro-fluoridation dogma quickly find their careers to be over, even if they innocently stumble into it. It also turns out that the USA's government had a huge vested interest in making fluoride appear harmless and even good for us, so fluoride polluters have dominated fluorine medical "science" since before I was born.

Understanding the basic science is very relevant to also understanding the bigger picture of how vested interests corrupt such basic issues. I have more to write on this issue, but I have a busy weekend ahead of me.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

To continue the theme of my previous post, scientific literacy does not mean being a professional scientist, but understanding the gist of the process and content of science. Science is not just a collection of "facts," but is a process of discovery that ideally anybody can pursue. That, at least, is the ideal. As with all professions in a world of scarcity, the reality is somewhat different, and the corruption that comes from conflicts of interest is the greatest distortion, coming from both scientists selling their souls for personal gain and political-economic interests interfering. Science is not easy, by any means, both the practice of it and understanding it, but I designed my big essay so that people do not need IQs of over 130 and scientific training to understand it. There is little math, and the physics is not very involved. As I have stated plenty, scientists such as Einstein and Schroedinger wanted to understand what was happening, not just producing math that made accurate predictions.

It is currently "impossible" to view much of what happens at the atomic level, and the quantum paradox of the wave/particle duality is one of many issues that make what happens at that level hard to imagine. But the "classical" way of viewing what is happening can be helpful, if the limitations are acknowledged. Basically, the classical view breaks down at the atomic level and the quantum view seems closer to reality, but when dealing with large numbers of atoms, the quantum strangeness is "smoothed" by the large "sample," and classical concepts can become more meaningful as a way to describe what is happening.

At the cellular level, classical concepts can come very close to describing the reality, although key dynamics are almost certainly ignored by mainstream science, which the work of Béchamp and his professional descendants have elucidated, armed with microscopes that attain "impossible" resolutions. But there are easily understood basics of what happens at the cellular level, and it is easy to see how conflicts of interest have corrupted "pure" science in those areas, and in highly important ways.

DNA and enzymes are very delicate molecules that are easily damaged, and both are held together by hydrogen bonds, which are relatively weak. Ultraviolet light, for instance, attacks double carbon bonds in DNA, and some atoms bonds with each other instead of making the hydrogen bonds that form DNA's core. When that happens, DNA repair mechanisms act on the broken DNA. If a cell is damaged enough, it will self-destruct, so that such cells do not reproduce.

Life forms have an amazing capacity to repair themselves. Today, is it thought that DNA repair mechanisms are what led to sexual reproduction about a billion years ago. That life can repair itself does not mean that the damage is a good thing. Just because a human can heal from a shotgun blast does not mean that shotgun blasts are a good thing. Ionizing radiation is like a microscopic shotgun blast that produces a "Swiss cheese" effect on the molecules impacted. Early in the nuclear age, people such as Edward Teller, the "father of the hydrogen bomb," began evangelizing that "a little radiation" is good for you, which has become the hypothesis of radiation hormesis. It is like saying that a little shotgun blast is good for you. The problem is that shotgun salesmen were the primary evangelists for that theory.

Similarly, in the late 19th century, burgeoning industrialization began creating great amounts of fluoride pollution. Fluorine is deadly to all animals, in its pure or ionized state, largely because the ions wreck enzymes by disrupting their hydrogen bonds (the pure form will wreck anything that it touches, will even make water burn). They also attack the hydrogen bonds in DNA, which I covered a little in my previous post. Once again, the fluorine ion acts like a shotgun blast at the cellular level and wrecks enzymes and DNA. By 1931, the fluorine ion was clearly identified as the cause of tooth mottling, which is today called dental fluorosis. Dental fluorosis is also only visible evidence of fluoride poisoning. The damage of fluoride poisoning is far greater than wrecking teeth.

In 1931, in the wake of the tooth mottling findings, an American scientist was assigned to see how much fluoride a child's tooth could stand before disintegrating. However, that scientist had a conflict of interest, as the largest shareholder of the world's greatest fluoride polluter had authority over the governmental agency that employed that scientist. After years of research, that scientist crazily concluded that fluoride was actually good for teeth! Years later, he admitted under oath that his "research" was worthless for establishing that fluoride was good for teeth, but that did not stop another scientist, working directly for the same shareholder of the fluoride polluter, that indeed, fluoride seemed to be good for teeth. And like that original scientist, that scientist also admitted that his so-called data was worthless, but many years later, after the damage was done.

A decade after those highly suspect research "results," a lawyer who was directly on the payroll of that largest fluoride polluter began a campaign to fluoridate the USA's water supply, and the only "evidence" was that worthless research carried out by those "pioneers." That would all be scandalous enough, but the federal government also developed a vested interest in proving fluoride harmless (and even good for you), as it used vast amounts of fluorine for making nuclear weapons. The Manhattan Project's chief medical scientist then began to dominate fluoride "research," which remains classified to this day, and he concocted the one part-per-million standard used today to fluoridate the USA's water supply. However, undeniable harm happens at two parts per million. A two-to-one window of beneficial-harmful effects is the smallest one in the history of medical science, I believe. When that Manhattan Project scientist was not playing fluoride propagandist, he advocated at least a 100-to-1 window for potentially harmful food additives. The man who helped addict women to tobacco designed the propaganda campaign to fluoridate the USA's water supply.

That all happened before I was born, and my water supply today has fluoride added to it. Just like "a little radiation is good for you," the "a little fluoride is good for you" advocates all had great conflicts of interest, and the evidence is that any damage is damage. The "a little poison is good for you" hypotheses of those propagandists are not only worthless, but evil. But vested interests carried the day, and still do, and scientists lined up to sell their souls. The Global Warming "debate" is just more of the same. There really is no debate to be had. Three-atom (and more) molecules in the atmosphere capture radiation escaping from Earth, and will warm Earth. There is no debate at all on that fact, but it is obfuscated by those scientists who sold their souls to the hydrocarbon lobby, and their eager dupes.

While science has its ideal, far too often it becomes so corrupt that it becomes evil, when vested interests prevail. Julian Simon's magnum opus is full of the writings of scientists who sold their souls to vested interests.

I am not done writing on this subject and related ones, and in coming days, I will make more posts on the subject of feigned objectivity in the professions. It exists in the media, among historians, and the like, but I suppose the crimes are more egregious in science. FE is totally off the table in scientific and "progressive" circles, even seen as the enemy, as the organized suppression of FE has reached surreal levels, and those naïve dupes have eagerly lapped up the disinformation.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

FYI, Scott and I are writing a little on current FE efforts, at his forum.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

From that thread with Scott, referred to in the previous post...

I really don't mind who brings out FE, as FE means the end of the world as we know it, in a good way. I am like Adam in that way. Tewari is using Adam's stuff (which the American government seized), and Adam wishes Tewari the best, and Tewari can even take credit for it. With almost no exceptions on Earth today, nobody's motives are pure. China is in the midst of an environmental and economic meltdown, so they have some incentive. The last I knew, Godzilla had a global reach and is alive and well, if divided. I would not mind if Godzilla let loose some of his Golden Hoard, or even Lockheed sold its billion dollar fusion reactors. Godzilla knows it is game over if FE gets out, however, but his saner members do not want to try to live on Mars.

My choir idea is partly about achieving a nugget of enlightened and comprehensive thought that can influence FE's enlightened implementation. I am not holding my breath that India or China does it, but it is an interesting time to be alive. I am sure that the spirits of Brian and Mr. Professor would cheer FE coming out, even if Godzilla did it.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I have written it publicly before, that Dennis's and my strategy when I became his partner in 1987 was to get something going so that the Big Boys would rush to the FE finish line ahead of us, and we would say, "Hell, you beat us! Congratulations!" Wink, nudge. We only wanted it to happen, and really had no interest in getting rich off of it, if by that path it meant that it would not happen. Those days in Boston were days of high ignorance for Dennis and me, and I began waking up fast in those days. We did not even know that there was an FE field, much less an alive and vigilant Godzilla. But we got Godzilla's first friendly buyout offer then. By the end of the next year, my life was ruined and I was radicalized, and had serious doubts about the inventor's/businessman's approach to FE, and not because of organized suppression, but because almost nobody had pure motivation. I learned that one the hard way, and resisted that lesson every step of the way, until I had it beaten into my head in no uncertain terms.

By the end of my second stint with Dennis, I was certain that the inventor's/businessman's path to FE would not work, and have not had interest in that approach ever since, even with Dennis's continual overtures. The NEM fiasco cured me of all mass movement ideas around making FE happen. Not enough people have the right stuff for that approach. I only came to my choir idea after nearly 40 years of life-risking and life-wrecking trial and error. Maybe the Chinese or Indians (subcontinent type) will end up being humanity's saviors, as they make FE happen. I would be among the first to cheer. Even Godzilla coming forward with it would be a major step in his redemption, and I would welcome it.

Time for work.

Best,

Wade

[Nine]

Hi Wade,

This is about Eli's post about ATP.

How really is a bicycle powered?

The two kinds of muscle fiber are distinguished by whether they tend to use the aerobic or the anaerobic chemical processes to produce mechanical power. (These are also distinguished by their "twitch speed," but because both speeds are fast enough for cycling it is more useful to consider the predominant metabolic processes.) The aerobic process uses oxygen and fuels that are taken directly from the blood to produce energy. The two fuels are fatty acids and glucose (also called blood sugar or dextrose). In this process these fuels become completely oxidized to carbon dioxide and water, producing lots of ATP (36 molecules of ATP for each molecule of glucose, for instance). Fatty acids that circulate in the blood are the predominant fuel for low-power activities such as normal walking. Though the body usually stores enough fat for many days of normal activity, it usually does not convert this fat to fatty acids fast enough to power intensive activity. If more than just normal power is demanded, as it is in cycling, the fuel for the additional power is largely glucose. Glucose is therefore the special athletic fuel. It circulates in the blood and is stored in the form of glycogen, both in the muscles and in the liver. For moderate power levels the muscles use blood glucose, which is replenished by glycogen conversion in the liver, by digestion of food carbohydrates, and by direct eating of foods containing glucose. These aerobic processes combine the fuels and the oxygen that circulate in the blood. If either fuel or oxygen is insufficient, the process won't work. Most exercise theory is based on activities in which oxygen is in shorter supply than fuel, but cycling is a very special exercise in which running low on oxygen is much less of a problem than running out of fuel.

and a link to a fine but dated article upon the bio mechinics of cycling.

http://www.johnforester.com/Articles...Physiology.htm

Much of the article above I barely understood yet I do this every day while pedaling my bicycle.

The ATP molecules provide the direct energy for muscle operation. Muscle consists of layers of protein material that can slide over each other but are connected together by a molecular ratchet, rather as the two parts of a car jack are locked together by the mechanism that lifts the car one tooth at a time. Just as you operate the jack handle once for each ratchet tooth, the muscle requires one molecule of ATP to move two adjacent layers one molecular-sized "tooth" distance, after which the layers lock together again unless the resisting object moves enough to allow the muscle to take up another "tooth distance," which requires another molecule of ATP.

You know now 75000 miles per year is where ultra cycling is going and they have a competition for this and two guys are in the process of riding over 200 miles per day for a year? Why? Because we can!

Wade, I have gone over what I have been reading and have made major changes to my reading regimen and I have deleted most websites that contain unsubstantiated conspiracy "theories" including project Avalon. The only threads I read upon Avalon are yours and a few of the other priority threads and I can tell you already that my outlook on life is much more positive. There are a few political bloggers that I might read but not many. Retail politics does not matter right now. However, when the energy issue gets sorted out Dennis Lehey's Reset button movement will become a doable option.

I must again thank you for this blog...


Will humanity break free and have free energy? Beats me if I know but life will go on for sure and all of us will go someplace better than this world in the end so its best to worry little and read more to understand what really is going on.

Thanx Wade

Nine

[Nine]

Wade,

Did you ever even consider the notion that money might be a way that energy is transported similar to ATP?

Just another way to look at energy transmission I suppose...

Thanx...

Nine

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Nine, money is only an accounting gimmick that influences human behavior. It has nothing to do with reality, other than the human ego. It serves a human exchange function today, which probably leads to your observation, but in a world of abundance, money is meaningless.

All "action" is an energy game, as all movement reflects energy, and energy is nothing more than motion, although scientists do not really know what energy is. So, sunlight got captured by organisms, made its way to your belly, and you use that energy to power your muscles and propel your bicycle. Orthodox theory today has all matter and energy coming from the Big Bang, which is science's version of the Book of Genesis.

Briefly, before I go to work, the issue of freedom impacts the FE issue. India and China are pursuing FE, or so it seems. There has long been this conceit among Westerners that the West is free, while communist and Third World nations are not. It is mostly a crock. The mechanisms of oppression are less subtle in those "primitive" nations, but the West achieves even greater levels of oppression, but it is all wrapped in a carefully contrived illusion. The oppression in those poorer nations is more honest than what you see in the West. There is no such thing as a free market, a free press, an objective history, a democratic government, or a freely pursued scientific method, especially on important issues. Scientists are relatively free to go dig up fossils and study Earth's past, but the medical and energy sciences, for instance, are dominated by political-economic interests, and nothing resembling free inquiry exists in them. People such as Dennis and Sparky discovered the hard way about free markets and the energy industry, and many crucified doctors and scientists discovered the hard way about medical freedom.

Orwell once remarked, in the original preface to Animal Farm, that while his book was a satire on the Soviet system, the West achieved similar results by different means. In the communist system, the government did the censoring, but in the West, private interests did. As if to prove him right, his publishers censored that preface, which has never been restored to its rightful place. When Dennis had his companies wiped out by the authorities, it was always at the behest of private interests. The government was merely the racket's muscle. As Chomsky noted, the level of censorship in the West actually exceeds what the Stalinist Soviet Union or Communist China achieved, but we call ourselves free.

Time for a long week of work.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

One brief note before I go out the door, on the freedom issue. People think the Internet is free, but almost everybody that I encounter in cyberspace cowers behind anonymity. That is anything but acting freely, and is not what a "free" Internet looks like, as everybody is afraid of having their identity revealed. In that way, it is no different from underground Communist efforts in Marx's time. The anonymous are not going to get anything of importance done, which is why the choir won't be made of anonymous members.

Best,

Wade