UFO Footage Captured By Homeland Security: The Analysis

[Selkie]

What are your thoughts about the footage in the OP, Citizen No 2?

p.s. I don't intend my question in a challenging way, btw.

p.s. And yes, I agree, the implications are the same. What matters to me is that the entities, or whatever they are, play with us for some mysterious reason of their own, and I am tired of seeing them make playthings of the human race. They get to us through our belief systems, and if they are the same as the Archons, then we need to be very wary of everything they have to say.

[Citizen No2]

Selkie wrote:

What are your thoughts about the footage in the OP, Citizen No 2?

Well,

if you read the analysis document it shows without doubt that a physical object was present. It flies with no obvious propulsion, it morphs into different shapes and enters water with no apparent problems. The cameras that filmed the object, as well as traditional 'video', also had infra-red capabilities that capture the whole event in a different spectrum........... Providing a good range of data that can be scientifically studied.

It was a physical objet displaying the characterists that we see.


Anything other that that I am not sure. Whether ours, theirs', from far away or close by, I have no idea. If we stopped for just one second and thought about the amount of evidence that exists, not just relying on interviews of whistleblowers, it is vast.

This footage, to me, is yet another piece of evidence for the prosecution.


Regards.

[Selkie]

Posted by Citizen No2 (here)
Selkie wrote:

What are your thoughts about the footage in the OP, Citizen No 2?

Well,

if you read the analysis document it shows without doubt that a physical object was present. It flies with no obvious propulsion, it morphs into different shapes and enters water with no apparent problems. The cameras that filmed the object, as well as traditional 'video', also had infra-red capabilities that capture the whole event in a different spectrum........... Providing a good range of data that can be scientifically studied.

It was a physical objet displaying the characterists that we see.


Anything other that that I am not sure. Whether ours, theirs', from far away or close by, I have no idea. If we stopped for just one second and thought about the amount of evidence that exists, not just relying on interviews of whistleblowers, it is vast.

This footage, to me, is yet another piece of evidence for the prosecution.


Regards.

Thank you so much for that wonderful reply, Citizen No 2.

The object on the film behaves in exactly the same way as Keel says the Ultraterrestrials behave. He says that they can and do exhibit the characteristics of real objects. Keel says that to do that, they seem to need atoms from our world, out of which they somehow create solid, though temporary, objects.

p.s. Btw, I am not trying to convince anyone of anything. I am only relating what Keel says in his book. But it all fits so well that it is amazing.

[Citizen No2]

You know what Selkie,

I would have to concur with that hypothesis too. It is as equally plausible.

We just have no way of confirming, either which way, what the truth is. So all we have, to agree on, is the footage.



Regards.

[kirolak]

Posted by bogeyman (here)
http://media.wix.com/ugd/299316_6118...6707e21fa7.pdf

The analysis of the film footage

This link says "This link is damaged and can not be repaired"