Simon Parkes says: Blue Avians? NO!

[idiit]

saying:
•Buzz Aldrin, in a Las Vegas conference a year after returning from the moon (20 July 1970, the anniversary), was asked by a reporter "what it was really like on the moon". Aldrin immediately felt so nauseous, and suddenly had such a gigantic headache, that he could not speak, started shaking uncontrollably, and his wife had to help him leave the room. This is documented in Buzz Aldrin's own autobiography. Weidner compares that to a scene in Kubrick's A Clockwork Orange, when apparently similar brainwashing methods were depicted in the film.

exactly the symptoms (exactly) kautz talks about in his group symposium on ai induced mind control. the ai makes it almost impossible for the ai victim to recall anything the ai does not want us to recall. the ai uses extreme headaches and often nausea to prevent us from cognitively going to places ( memory and even terminology/words) that the ai doesn't want us to "go to".

[truth4me]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by TrumanCash (here)

However, MK Ultra-style mind control--the kind that black ops, secret government projects, CIA, etc, employs--uses unconsciousness to implant false memories in the subject, not fabricating false memories consciously.

After having met three individuals who were programmed while in an unconscious state using MK Ultra-style techniques, it is not a stretch for me to understand that individuals in a "secret space program" would be routinely mind controlled.

Area 51 whistleblower Bob Lazar famously left his job there after realizing that he'd arrived back at Las Vegas on the regular evening shuttle flight from the base — and couldn't remember a thing about what he'd done that day. He went straight round to John Lear's house, and told him what had happened. The rest is history, as they say.

Also famously, none of the Apollo astronauts can actually remember being on the moon. It's all a blank. Even Edgar Mitchell has admitted this.

If memories can be overlaid with a 'blank' (which is how it works... like placing a blank sheet of paper over something with writing on it, so that the original can no longer be seen) — they can also be overlaid with a SUBSTITUTE. This is very old, fairly simple technology (even stage hypnotists can do this!), and it's been in place since the early 1950s or very probably long before.

If none of the Apollo astronauts can't remember ever being on the moon then it brings up the old " was the moon landing faked " stuff...Buzz Aldrin talks about how the earth looks and how the surface of the moon looks. Google Buzz Aldrin moon landing. Someone is lying....

[Carmody]

Posted by idiit (here)

saying:
•Buzz Aldrin, in a Las Vegas conference a year after returning from the moon (20 July 1970, the anniversary), was asked by a reporter "what it was really like on the moon". Aldrin immediately felt so nauseous, and suddenly had such a gigantic headache, that he could not speak, started shaking uncontrollably, and his wife had to help him leave the room. This is documented in Buzz Aldrin's own autobiography. Weidner compares that to a scene in Kubrick's A Clockwork Orange, when apparently similar brainwashing methods were depicted in the film.

exactly the symptoms (exactly) kautz talks about in his group symposium on ai induced mind control. the ai makes it almost impossible for the ai victim to recall anything the ai does not want us to recall. the ai uses extreme headaches and often nausea to prevent us from cognitively going to places ( memory and even terminology/words) that the ai doesn't want us to "go to".

Like the moon?

As in remote viewing or astral projecting to the moon? same scenario, for most people.

The moon. The thing in the sky that does not fit any of the criteria for being there. That it's perfection of all it's attributes and orbital considerations, simply do not fit any functional model of astrophysics.

Yet, for some reason, this seems to slip by everyone.

Like this post will.

Like when a friend asks me to take them to the edge of reality that they consider, and beyond. A way of proving to them all the things I hint to them.

Yet they don't recall that I took them to that exact spot, twice before.


http://singularityhub.com/2015/08/02...s-think-again/

Which is why I list things like this little musical bit:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=EDFv-8Cvbbg

The song 'Hindenburg' ('oh the humanity') (the recording, and the burn of the recording')

From the group 'Telefuzz'.

From the album 'Sleep'.

Published by the company 'Upstairs Recordings'.

Like, Abstract Trains and imaginary Rain.

Maybe Don Verbrilli is trying to tell you something. Also note the article from RT speaks about sonic methods. Phononic methods. Which science is finally returning to.

[Hervé]

They trained for years for that specific mission... and they don't recall a damn thing!

Now, about the following:

Posted by Star Tsar (here)
[...]

Ah right to be more precise the late great Patrick Moore asked about seeing stars and Neil answers with only being able to see through the optics and goes on to say he does not recall seeing stars and then Micheal Colins says he does not remember seeing any stars at all then Armstrong gives him a gentle STFU elbow!
So I guess I have to redact my brainwashin comment...

[...]

Well, imagine you are on Earth and it's daytime... daylight is on and you look up into the sky... do you see stars?... or a blue sky?

See?

The moon landers weren't using flashlights to pick a stroll... right?

So... the nudge might have been a reminder not to explain why they couldn't see any stars during daytime... it would have revealed the Moon as having an atmosphere!

The latter: THAT would have lent too much credence to Ingo Swann and his description of humans working there without breathing apparatuses... SEE?

[idiit]

Like this post will.

^ not.

kautz ( I love kautz. can anyone tell?) says from his research the hundredth monkey effect actually only requires 12 starter monkeys. cause and effect.

The moon. The thing in the sky that does not fit any of the criteria for being there. That it's perfection of all it's attributes and orbital considerations, simply do not fit any functional model of astrophysics.

^ it's pretty much accepted in alt news that the moon is not a natural object. I go with the camp that says it was maneuvered into it's spot. the fact it's the only known celestial object that is parked in place and doesn't rotate says a lot.

Yet they don't recall that I took them to that exact spot, twice before.

^ same thing happens to me daily. ppl aren't ready for it yet. when they are ready they will see. can't teach a blind man to see. have to wait till his sight sufficiently develops.

sonic methods

an aspect of frequency of energy. as we transform into higher dimensional entities we will view everything as spirit and energy according to the 'ed' stuff.

[Carmody]

Posted by Carmody (here)

Posted by idiit (here)

saying:
•Buzz Aldrin, in a Las Vegas conference a year after returning from the moon (20 July 1970, the anniversary), was asked by a reporter "what it was really like on the moon". Aldrin immediately felt so nauseous, and suddenly had such a gigantic headache, that he could not speak, started shaking uncontrollably, and his wife had to help him leave the room. This is documented in Buzz Aldrin's own autobiography. Weidner compares that to a scene in Kubrick's A Clockwork Orange, when apparently similar brainwashing methods were depicted in the film.

exactly the symptoms (exactly) kautz talks about in his group symposium on ai induced mind control. the ai makes it almost impossible for the ai victim to recall anything the ai does not want us to recall. the ai uses extreme headaches and often nausea to prevent us from cognitively going to places ( memory and even terminology/words) that the ai doesn't want us to "go to".

http://singularityhub.com/2015/08/02...s-think-again/



Maybe Don Verbrilli is trying to tell you something. Also note the article from RT speaks about sonic methods. Phononic methods. Which science is finally returning to.

Phononic. Sound Phonon. Mechanical vibration. Ohmmmm.... and so on. Music. Sound. Vibration. Tied to time, and energy exchange... and flow though from one space to the next.


Think Your Conscious Brain Directs Your Actions? Think Again

Think your deliberate, guiding, conscious thoughts are in charge of your actions?

Think again.

In a provocative new paper in Behavioral and Brain Sciences, a team led by Dr. Ezequiel Morsella at San Francisco State University came to a startling conclusion: consciousness is no more than a passive machine running one simple algorithm — to serve up what’s already been decided, and take credit for the decision.

Rather than a sage conductor, it’s just a tiny part of what happens in the brain that makes us “aware.” All the real work goes on under the hood — in our unconscious minds.

That you can be hypnotized. That you can be brainwashed.

That the voice in your head is just a high level reporting program, and the real work and real world goes on down in your unconscious, your subconscious... the dream world, the astral world, and so on.

That manipulation of this high level reporting program via hypnotics, programming, insertion of ..whatever..... all this colors it, filters it, defeats it, bends it. It can, and does, in people..create a condition where they are stuck in thinking that this high level program is actually them. The ego body system.

It bends the entire world, it bends the protrusion, this dimensional bubble, this 3d-timespace dimensional reality bubble. That the high level reporting program, the voice in the head, is of this place, this space.

Don't look inside, stay in fear, stay in conflict stay on the voice in head monkey level, don't look at the moon, psychic phenomena is not real, neither are aliens, nor other dimensions, nor anti-gravity, and so on....none of that is real.

If it is the hypnotic, the lock into the surface level of the complex multi-dimensional you..if the above is all real...that hypnotic lock..... comes off.


FORGET EVERYTHING YOU JUST READ --- AND GO BACK TO SLEEP.

That is the command. That is the push, the directive.

Let see how long you can hang onto the moment of knowing.

Your task, is to enlarge that window.

Otherwise the so-called consciousness and self below it, when it comes to commanding this space, is just a circular lock from lips to ass.

[Hervé]

...

ZZZZZZZZZZZ'allZZZZZZ'CarZZZZZZZZZ'mauditZZZZZ'foltZZZZ'seydZ'sumthinZZZZZZZ'don'tZZZZZZZZZZZ'remamm berrrrrrrZZZZZZZZZZZZ

[Carmody]

Some visuals, to help one understand.

The other important point, is that your past and future awareness is tied to the given 2d eternal now moment, as you fly along grid points in the oscillating 2d field pairing vibratory 'now' positions.



The past and future is the bubble of this universe (below), a bubble connected to the surface of this rainbow seeming sheet (above).

Your awareness bubble is tied to that past history and expression of potentials and future, in this given 3d time-field bubble (the same bubble mentioned above, expressed differently, expressed in an expanded way)

If you keep fear focusing on the idea of and AI, all you will do, is project it as your monkey based adversary opposite, in your future timeline explorations. You will 'drive' to it, in potentials, due to connections and focus. think of a roiling eddy current filled ball, connected to a 2d plane. the 2d plane is made up of a pair of 2d fields in vibratory interlock, they create a 'rainbow' surface of vibration.



Now, imagine a 2d folded back on itself field... a bubble, rolling along it's surface, connected to it. That's your past to future field, this 3d universe. But connected to the 2d field, at the bubble to surface point. Mathematically, all points of the folded back 3d seeming 2d bubble..are connected to the 2d sheet.



You steer it, via past recognition, and projection of the frontwave of the 'rolling'. Your moment of awareness decides the intensity of the steering and the size of the bubble. we collectively and individually steer it.

So, in effect, thinking in fear of an AI, only brings it closer as a black to your white, a complement in contrast of the monkey ego which is trying to project safety (lions in the tall grass) in a web of enforced fear. To drive the rolling roiling bubble of awareness, across the singular 2d sheet contact point, to a given connection point, a given timeline, or 'future'.

Try thinking of other things, to know that this is what you are doing, steering futures, creating space, and so on, this is key. I am god, you are god, this is god. You are responsible for you, when you protrude into and are of this space and place.

[onawah]

It seems like most people try to avoid that dilemma by not thinking about anything scary at all, which doesn't get us very far, either...

[ulli]

Just a minute before reading Carmody's last post I saw this:

"The time for discussion approaches an end. You will either clean up the mess and end the leadership of those responsible or this will end.
It is all a matter of recognizing the reality of your situation and acting in concert along lines of moral determination."
~James Horak

There are many researchers out there who can offer alternative inspirational sources to AI.
Far more wholesome than the distractions being offered by the dark side.
The greatest of all lies is that something out there can overwhelm us.

The power is within each of us. But to access that power we all need to look out for number one,
and find our place and calling within this immense universe.

There is a risk though. By doing so someone close to you will say "why do you have to make this about yourself?"
And put a guilt trip on us.
But how can it ever be about anyone else when we have no clue where their place is in this immense universe?
Our personal focus is a matter of choice....some options need to be rejected.
The important must give way to the most important.
Each one must decide for themselves what that means.

Let's all choose well because we will be held responsible and pay the price by the ever unfolding future world.

[ulli]

Posted by onawah (here)
It seems like most people try to avoid that dilemma by not thinking about anything scary at all, which doesn't get us very far, either...

True. But that is fear-based choice, not a conscious choice.
When we go out there with conscious creativity and vision
then getting attacked will be a part of the package.
And for that we need to put on the cloak of courage and have faith that we are always protected.

[araucaria]

Posted by ulli (here)
"The time for discussion approaches an end. You will either clean up the mess and end the leadership of those responsible or this will end."
... The greatest of all lies is that something out there can overwhelm us.

Exactly. This ultimatum is to take effect before you get time to read the small print. When in point of fact the time for discussion has only just begun. Discussion is not getting in the way of applying a solution, it is the solution, in its early stages. Recognizing one has a problem is a first major step to overcoming that problem. Why? Because it destroys the very idea of a leadership out there to overwhelm us. If dates like 2000 or 2012 have any significance in 2015, it is precisely to tell us: take your time, more haste is truly less speed. We are the community of those who will not be rushed, another way of saying in control of our own destiny.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Carmody (here)
That the voice in your head is just a high level reporting program, and the real work and real world goes on down in your unconscious, your subconscious... the dream world, the astral world, and so on.

Therein lies another way of explaining creativity.

For me, over the years, it was most often in the world of computer software. More commonly it is associated with such worlds as painting, music, literature, other art forms, ... and with other areas open to major advances of thought and understanding, such as mathematics and physics, and inventions of new (to our consciously shared world) devices and processes.

The trick is to find and nurture ways and means to tease out the unconscious realizations into expressible, realizable form. This may be why scientific and mathematical "discoveries" often seem to happen in several places, independently, all at once. Their essential prerequisite, of some refinement or adjustment of unconscious awareness, was likely already happening, and not independently at all.

[Shadowself]

I don't know much about Simon except one video he did where he was being regressed and started to remember an Egyptian ritual. The person who was regressing him stopped him cold and guided him away from it and that quite upset me because I felt it was important. If he ever did go back and view that ritual I have no idea....but it was quite interesting.

The rest I have no idea...and can't comment on Simon's ability. But he does 'suggest' that implanted memory might be feasible in this BA thing.

Recently it's been suggested he's being toyed with by AI which is silly. Because if he were...he'd be making a whole lot more sense. Which he is not.

Basically people are giving this guy a whole lot more credit for things he's been reading up on and plagiarizing by others and reformulated into his new fantasy.

I'm have a real hard time believing this is even an implanted memory. I think it's just turned into a cash cow for his lack of wanting to go back to work after his hiatus with temporary work related disability which he's also been milking for some time now.

Imaging that. Some of us who have had experience that is unfathomable STILL have to work for a living and pay the bills. Believe me that's not easy but far better on self confidence and at the end of the day, I personally can benefit from that little thing called self respect. I wonder if he can.

[Elainie]

Posted by Shadowself (here)
I don't know much about Simon except one video he did where he was being regressed and started to remember an Egyptian ritual. The person who was regressing him stopped him cold and guided him away from it and that quite upset me because I felt it was important. If he ever did go back and view that ritual I have no idea....but it was quite interesting.

The rest I have no idea...and can't comment on Simon's ability. But he does 'suggest' that implanted memory might be feasible in this BA thing.

Recently it's been suggested he's being toyed with by AI which is silly. Because if he were...he'd be making a whole lot more sense. Which he is not.

Basically people are giving this guy a whole lot more credit for things he's been reading up on and plagiarizing by others and reformulated into his new fantasy.

I'm have a real hard time believing this is even an implanted memory. I think it's just turned into a cash cow for his lack of wanting to go back to work after his hiatus with temporary work related disability which he's also been milking for some time now.

Imaging that. Some of us who have had experience that is unfathomable STILL have to work for a living and pay the bills. Believe me that's not easy but far better on self confidence and at the end of the day, I personally can benefit from that little thing called self respect. I wonder if he can.

^^^^ This. Everyone read and reread. Of course it's my belief as well. I do not think (based on what others have told me who had interactions with Corey over the years) he is a MILAB or anything of the sort.

[Elainie]

Posted by truth4me (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by TrumanCash (here)

However, MK Ultra-style mind control--the kind that black ops, secret government projects, CIA, etc, employs--uses unconsciousness to implant false memories in the subject, not fabricating false memories consciously.

After having met three individuals who were programmed while in an unconscious state using MK Ultra-style techniques, it is not a stretch for me to understand that individuals in a "secret space program" would be routinely mind controlled.

Area 51 whistleblower Bob Lazar famously left his job there after realizing that he'd arrived back at Las Vegas on the regular evening shuttle flight from the base — and couldn't remember a thing about what he'd done that day. He went straight round to John Lear's house, and told him what had happened. The rest is history, as they say.

Also famously, none of the Apollo astronauts can actually remember being on the moon. It's all a blank. Even Edgar Mitchell has admitted this.

If memories can be overlaid with a 'blank' (which is how it works... like placing a blank sheet of paper over something with writing on it, so that the original can no longer be seen) — they can also be overlaid with a SUBSTITUTE. This is very old, fairly simple technology (even stage hypnotists can do this!), and it's been in place since the early 1950s or very probably long before.

If none of the Apollo astronauts can't remember ever being on the moon then it brings up the old " was the moon landing faked " stuff...Buzz Aldrin talks about how the earth looks and how the surface of the moon looks. Google Buzz Aldrin moon landing. Someone is lying....

I believe Clark McClelland who states we did land on the moon. I also like to think I have a good BS radar and Clark (IMO) is telling the truth. His story never changes and he never elaborates/makes up stories on things he cannot answer.

[MorningFox]

I must say I have to agree, sadly. I would love to believe him but my instincts make it impossible for me to believe this man. Every time I watch him my intuition tells me he is either making it up and/or regurgitating what he has read elsewhere. Sorry. I'd love to be wrong.

[Andrew]

Posted by Hervé (here)
They trained for years for that specific mission... and they don't recall a damn thing!

Now, about the following:

Posted by Star Tsar (here)
[...]

Ah right to be more precise the late great Patrick Moore asked about seeing stars and Neil answers with only being able to see through the optics and goes on to say he does not recall seeing stars and then Micheal Colins says he does not remember seeing any stars at all then Armstrong gives him a gentle STFU elbow!
So I guess I have to redact my brainwashin comment...

[...]

Well, imagine you are on Earth and it's daytime... daylight is on and you look up into the sky... do you see stars?... or a blue sky?

See?

The moon landers weren't using flashlights to pick a stroll... right?

So... the nudge might have been a reminder not to explain why they couldn't see any stars during daytime... it would have revealed the Moon as having an atmosphere!

The latter: THAT would have lent too much credence to Ingo Swann and his description of humans working there without breathing apparatuses... SEE?

Don't think you can see stars through the screen when doing front screen projection.

[Finefeather]

Posted by kirolak (here)
I am horrified, the Apollo astronauts CAN NOT REMEMBER being on the moon? I do not mean to chalenge anyone, but is there a link/proof of this?? Please do not be offended!

There are many instances where astronauts talk of been on the moon...just search for Buzz Aldrin...or others... on YouTube or on Google.

Yes they seem to avoid many questions...but this could very well be because of what they saw on the moon...like structure etc...and have been forbidden to talk of it...so this would obviously place a great strain on them.

In esoteric writings it states that the moon is far older than earth and was inhabited by Beings before the earth humans started on earth planet...so it would be expected that there would be old structures on the moon...and it would just confirm what esoterics tells us.

edit: That's of course if they actually went to the moon

[Limor Wolf]

I can't help but wonder why some here - good people, feel personal hurt when a 'messenger' is not falling into their proper criticism, there may be several reasons for that of course, but certain things that may not be taken into consideration are : Times, we are living in times of great troubles by a society which is coming out of a long lasting coma with quite the objection in the image of interdimensional interference, human impacted interference, cyclic planetary energies and technologies that are invasive at best. Looking for a leader that will give us the correct answers all the time at all times is a role that goes beyond the acceptance/non acceptance of information, it goes right into our inner most psychological need to relay on a reliable source in days of stormy water which often times leads to dissapointment and an automatic discharge of some good portion of information that lays within the more 'influenced' one

This puts a big long mirror infront of us, that (if only we dare and take a look) we may identify the deep place from which our expectations emerge and perheps discontinue to over analyze any one human being who comes forward with mission/programming/aspiration/desire to do something, and relate to their informative offers mostly instead

We are living in times of (deliberate) confusion and personal and collective uncertainty, so it's all quite understood, but more than none the conclusions that come up are two ends of the same rope, it's either all 'one big fantasy in someone's head' or perheps the opposite of 'ultimate truth in the hands of a one person'.

Truth is, the distinctivness of the game being played and the role of each and every one reveals a whole fabric that has both 'DNA' and 'junk DNA' within it's pattern. There is always more than the eye can see, it's not all made from the same fabric on the same shirt, there are several woven yarns which reflect things that we yet need to learn and therefore we may want to thank the person and not attack them personally and when all yarns are identified which one is coming from where, we can make up our minds and see if it suits us to continue and if not we can simply walk away ~