Posted by Thunderbird
(here)
I once had a very insightful conversation with John Perkins the man who wrote "Confessions of an Economic Hitman," at some random event that he was speaking at.
He shook my hand in what I thought was an awkward way. I obviously didn't know what the proper way to shake his hand was. lol. He later intimated that the thought that I was there to kill him had crossed his mind.
Now, I am by NO means any sort of character that would be doing anything CLOSE to that sort of thing. I was just some random guy at a random event, but I could tell that he was genuinely concerned. Perhaps he was far past the line and men such as "Charles" had paid him "soft" visits in the past.
After all, he was one of the people who DID do some of the "softer" persuasion tactics that "Charles" describes, only he "worked" with heads of state. Whether "Charles" does or not is inconsequential.
John's message was one of self control, voting with your dollars, and becoming educated as to the true workings of the world. He wanted to give people a chance.
Interestingly, he said this to me when i asked him about free energy....
"Look at what we've done with energy since the industrial revolution...how much more would we mess up the planet if it was abundant and everywhere. "
At the time i didn't like the answer. I didn't want to, because I believed in the over whelming goodness of mankind. I believed everyone was like me, able to exist in homeostasis with our environment, wanting the highest good for all beings. Now, i am aware that the world is a business model and as well intentioned as i was...i was living in fairy tale land.
Now, of course it is also telling that a man of his nature, position, and previous work habits was afraid for his life. That displays the commitment of the people he worked on behalf of and the seriousness they prescribe to their dealings.
I am not here as a judge of men by any stretch of the imagination, however I would like to take the moment to point out how committed they are to what they might consider a "lowest collateral" global takeover.
Why forcibly enslave the globe through military force only to watch it crumble the minute it is in place, when you can with enough patience and determination position the planet to create your favored outcome. To quote "Charles," is it murder to kill 30 people to save 300,000?
Rather than conquer the globe with force, as has been done countless times throughout history to no avail, they have devised what I must appreciate as a tactical, patient, strategic, well hidden, well thought out plan that is laser like in its attention to detail and scope. It DOES meet what I presume is
their criteria for a "bloodless" coup, though it may not meet yours. It DOES display an attempt at doing the right thing by their measure.
After all, isn't it reasonable from their perspective as evidenced by "Charles" to get rid of a couple problems rather than actively kill millions? Aren't they presumably trying to make a utopian, healthy, advanced planet and civilization?
We mustn't prescribe our moral values on a culture that has an entirely different modality, and cultural value, as abhorrent as you may judge it to be. Remember they do not consider it killing off the population if the population isn't smart enough to figure out whats going on and know how to be self sufficient if food production is cut off.
I for one would LOVE to live in a world where such tactics, strategies, and force aren't necessary. Alas, at this point in Humanity's evolution this does not seem to be the case. If I COULD swipe my hand and make it that way I would, but as it is not that way AND we have been "dealt a ****ty hand" as was said earlier somewhere in this forum, I make this series of propositions:
1. Deal with it.
It is unpleasant. It
is ****ty. You don't run the show. You don't even run the green room at the show. You're lucky to be in the audience at all at this point. you've walked into a room and people are playing a game that you don't know the rules. you don't even know the name of the game!
2. That fact is "the Elite" are you.
You must forgive yourself of all your faults. You must forgive yourself for being manipulative, deceitful, cruel, heartless, and any and all of the horrible things you prescribe to these folks. If you see it in them, its because its in you at some level, even if its benign. This was the hardest part of this process for me over the past few years, accepting my own characteristics that limited me.
If you want to get heady about it, think of the globe as a whole organism. We individual humans are "thoughts" on this planet. Here for a blink of an eye. Imagine your life sped up to one fraction of a second and watch it from space. You would look like a lightning bolt across the face of the globe...or rather a firing of neurons in a brain. These divine (aren't we all?) human beings "running" the planet could be thought of as fundamental "egoic" thoughts concerned with self preservation, control, making sense of a chaotic field of information. They have a fundamentally important role to play in the character of our civilization, just as having those same thoughts scaled down to the individual level protect you and help you function and stay alive in your own experience. Every one makes order out of chaos throughout their WHOLE lives.
3. If we are to create a world together, it has to be "together."
Everyone's needs must be met without judgement. Any good business person and negotiator will find out what each party's needs, wants, and deal breakers are and come up with solutions that meets each party's needs without pushing the deal breakers.
4. There are NO "shoulds"
The world "shouldn't" be this way. the world "shouldn't" be that way...It is what we make of it.
5. Accept your power
If you were to accept about yourself what the "elite" have accepted about themselves in the first place...NONE of this would be happening. They accept that they are powerful. They accept that they are divine. They ACCEPT that the world is what THEY make of it. AND....THEY ARE ACTING ON IT. And, by their account doing the best they know how to do. What's your excuse?
6. Look at the georgia guidestones.
Want to know what they want? Look there. If I were to paint a global civilization Id pretty much do what it says. It makes sense. I mean, these families HAVE had hundreds if not thousands of years to come up with a vision, make a business plan, and implement it. Of course, its that pesky first one thats got the masses all riled up now hasn't it. Population at 500,000,000 i believe? I mean everything else is pretty dang reasonable, heck even desirable...
So population....
I would offer that it isn't so much a problem of how many, but rather management. Specifically, management of resources. I have stated that I believe the planet CAN sustain Billions and Billions of people if resources were managed properly, and organizational structures were created properly. I would go so far as to assert that a form of socialism were necessary to manage that many people and systems. It would, however require "buy in."
If a clearly defined vision of what we are trying to create were proposed and people were inspired to create it with the type of leadership people like JFK, MLK, and Ghandi represented and some creative marketing thrown into the mix, while still giving functioning power to the people who hold the cards, so to speak, then we have a starting point. I believe this is what "they" were attempting to do with "Barry Sotero" or whatever people think his name is.
JFK's problem was that from 'their" perspective he was gonna f-up the whole business model....the FED.
I'd say to would be revolutionaries...can't have a revolution unless your willing to eat rats.
As Bill stated in his opening, the technology IS there to make this vision real. We CAN clean up this mess. We CAN provide food, water, clean energy, and the basics to people of the world, perhaps in exchange for directed effort towards the goals of the planet.
We could control the population with incentives, tax breaks, what have you, if people will limit THEMSELVES to a certain amount of children.
We could keep nation states, make WW3 the highest ratings "war game" that helps nations resolve trade disputes, generates billions of dollars, doesn't kill anyone, but still trains soldiers to go into space and defend our planet. Which i believe is VERY important.
With a little patience and dedication we could really come up with all sorts of workable, desirable, solutions.
but for now....I must go to sleep.
Goodnight.
Re: THE RULERS OF THE WORLD: a new Project Avalon video interview
Bookmarks