Torsion and Math

GregorArturo · 10-15-2008, 03:08 PM

Thanks Day! I discovered the Emerald Tablet a couple years ago, and I def consider to be one of most important pieces of writing, especially of such a small size, from our history (Most famous historicals pieces are whole books like the Iliad, Gilgamesh, and the Vedas).

Just to let you know, several other posts in this thread have already introduced me to Mark Rodin. If you read my latest post, it shares how I connected my work with prime numbers with his. Obviously, their is an overall pattern to life.

day · 10-20-2008, 05:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregorArturo

Thanks Day! I discovered the Emerald Tablet a couple years ago, and I def consider to be one of most important pieces of writing, especially of such a small size, from our history (Most famous historicals pieces are whole books like the Iliad, Gilgamesh, and the Vedas).

Just to let you know, several other posts in this thread have already introduced me to Mark Rodin. If you read my latest post, it shares how I connected my work with prime numbers with his. Obviously, their is an overall pattern to life.

Hi Mark
I think your field of interest is fascinating and found this site regarding mensionization in the Emerald Tables--
http://www.alchemylab.com/quantum3.htm

day

ABHA · 11-02-2008, 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregorArturo

Thanks Day! I discovered the Emerald Tablet a couple years ago, and I def consider to be one of most important pieces of writing, especially of such a small size, from our history (Most famous historicals pieces are whole books like the Iliad, Gilgamesh, and the Vedas).

Just to let you know, several other posts in this thread have already introduced me to Mark Rodin. If you read my latest post, it shares how I connected my work with prime numbers with his. Obviously, their is an overall pattern to life.

Got to admit how this is over my head, but you sound like the guy this info could help.. hope it does

http://www.themeasuringsystemofthegods.com/

isotelesis · 11-02-2008, 04:11 PM

Look into Clifford Algebras, Finsler Geometry, Topology, Brane worlds, Commutativity, Holonomy, Isometry, Hypersurfaces, Calabai-Yau Orbifolds.

http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/QuanCon.html
http://quantumfuture.net/quantum_future/JadCon.htm
http://www.math.tntech.edu/rafal/coo...nvitedForm.pdf
http://www.springerlink.com/content/u0p3l78n66v65307/

GregorArturo · 11-03-2008, 02:34 AM

Thanks for sharing! I am definitely going to check them out.

I got a couple questions if people can help me out with them.

So I've recently confirmed that cubic lattice structures (all metal substances, grids such as cities!) degrade cellular life, while hexagonal (triangular) lattice structures (carbon, quartz, honey comb) encourage/aid cellular life.

If you've read some of my work, I've been trying to understand this much more through mathematics and physics more as a supplement to the mathematics (when its usually the other way around). However, my personal research or say experimentation has only remained in the context of mathematical theory, and then also first hand experiences such as with reiki and orgonite.

I have noticed that there is a definite indescretion among people in terms of context.

Within the orgonite community, it is stated that all metallic substances repel orgone, while all organic substances attract orgone. It is also said crystals attract it, and convert negative orgone to positive orgone. To continue, let's just call orgone energy, torsion fields (as there is a big difference between energy and fields, and the latter is more correct).

There are then pieces of nonscientific information going around that pyramids built out of copper (just the edges) or other metals/alloys, focus the energy inside it.

There is David Wilcock's research, specifically focusing on Golod's pyramids in Russia, in which the pyramids must be constructed completely out of nonmetallic substances (ie fiberglass) for the reason being metal tends to absorb torsion fields negating their effects.

DW also goes into the cavity effect with honey combs, which sounds confusing in itself, but from the gist of it, the cavity effect seems to absorb or attract torsion fields rather strongly toward them, and also possibly away from someone in the vicinity making them dizzy/sick. It's only functional if it's placed above the users head. My guess being is the geometry is so strong as stated, that its even absorbing energy from the earth in a significant amount, that it creates a flow between the object and the ground, so being inside this flow is beneficial.

So what it comes down to, with the lattice structures, they are directly different in how they affect torsion fields, but what is the inherent property of each structure?

What I am concluding is that hexagonal radiates torsion fields, while cubic absorbs/negates them. In reference to orgonite, then this would mean that you are having a flow from one to the other, but it would seem that they would cancel each other out.

Any help would be greatly appreciated

isotelesis · 11-07-2008, 02:44 AM

Richard Hammond is someone you should also know about.

http://xxx.lanl.gov/PS_cache/arxiv/p...806.1277v2.pdf

Art · 11-07-2008, 02:30 PM

Gregor,

Research into all of this can be pretty fun, huh? And exhausting.

What you are looking for or have found (in terms of lattice structure for metals) is:

Hexagonal Close Packed
Face-Centered Cubic (sometimes called Cubic Close Packed)
Body Centered Cubic

I did a quick search and found this site which may help a little:

http://www.chemistry.ohio-state.edu/...754/str_cp.htm

You'll have to scroll down to nearly the bottom to see the table of elements (more common elements, not inclusive). From memory, Be (beryllium), when it oxidizes is highly TOXIC. Similar with Cadmium. Out of the list for HCP, magnesium, zinc, and titanium would be "the safer" metals to work with. Magnesium and Zinc oxidize very easily, so titanium may be the best to "work with".

Of course, remember that nearly all "metals" are alloys. Metallurgically speaking, it is nearly impossible to have a "pure" metal. Impurities and/or alloying elements change the structure and properties (physical, mechanical, etc.). Surely you can combine this with the torsion research you're doing...

Hope this helps, sorry if redundant.

Art

10-15-2008, 03:08 PM	#1
GregorArturo Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Southern Maine Posts: 560	Re: Torsion and Math Thanks Day! I discovered the Emerald Tablet a couple years ago, and I def consider to be one of most important pieces of writing, especially of such a small size, from our history (Most famous historicals pieces are whole books like the Iliad, Gilgamesh, and the Vedas). Just to let you know, several other posts in this thread have already introduced me to Mark Rodin. If you read my latest post, it shares how I connected my work with prime numbers with his. Obviously, their is an overall pattern to life.

11-02-2008, 04:11 PM	#4
isotelesis Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 112	Re: Torsion and Math Look into Clifford Algebras, Finsler Geometry, Topology, Brane worlds, Commutativity, Holonomy, Isometry, Hypersurfaces, Calabai-Yau Orbifolds. http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/QuanCon.html http://quantumfuture.net/quantum_future/JadCon.htm http://www.math.tntech.edu/rafal/coo...nvitedForm.pdf http://www.springerlink.com/content/u0p3l78n66v65307/

11-03-2008, 02:34 AM	#5
GregorArturo Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Southern Maine Posts: 560	Re: Torsion and Math Thanks for sharing! I am definitely going to check them out. I got a couple questions if people can help me out with them. So I've recently confirmed that cubic lattice structures (all metal substances, grids such as cities!) degrade cellular life, while hexagonal (triangular) lattice structures (carbon, quartz, honey comb) encourage/aid cellular life. If you've read some of my work, I've been trying to understand this much more through mathematics and physics more as a supplement to the mathematics (when its usually the other way around). However, my personal research or say experimentation has only remained in the context of mathematical theory, and then also first hand experiences such as with reiki and orgonite. I have noticed that there is a definite indescretion among people in terms of context. Within the orgonite community, it is stated that all metallic substances repel orgone, while all organic substances attract orgone. It is also said crystals attract it, and convert negative orgone to positive orgone. To continue, let's just call orgone energy, torsion fields (as there is a big difference between energy and fields, and the latter is more correct). There are then pieces of nonscientific information going around that pyramids built out of copper (just the edges) or other metals/alloys, focus the energy inside it. There is David Wilcock's research, specifically focusing on Golod's pyramids in Russia, in which the pyramids must be constructed completely out of nonmetallic substances (ie fiberglass) for the reason being metal tends to absorb torsion fields negating their effects. DW also goes into the cavity effect with honey combs, which sounds confusing in itself, but from the gist of it, the cavity effect seems to absorb or attract torsion fields rather strongly toward them, and also possibly away from someone in the vicinity making them dizzy/sick. It's only functional if it's placed above the users head. My guess being is the geometry is so strong as stated, that its even absorbing energy from the earth in a significant amount, that it creates a flow between the object and the ground, so being inside this flow is beneficial. So what it comes down to, with the lattice structures, they are directly different in how they affect torsion fields, but what is the inherent property of each structure? What I am concluding is that hexagonal radiates torsion fields, while cubic absorbs/negates them. In reference to orgonite, then this would mean that you are having a flow from one to the other, but it would seem that they would cancel each other out. Any help would be greatly appreciated

11-07-2008, 02:44 AM	#6
isotelesis Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 112	Re: Torsion and Math Richard Hammond is someone you should also know about. http://xxx.lanl.gov/PS_cache/arxiv/p...806.1277v2.pdf

11-07-2008, 02:30 PM	#7
Art Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Western NC Posts: 5	Re: Torsion and Math Gregor, Research into all of this can be pretty fun, huh? And exhausting. What you are looking for or have found (in terms of lattice structure for metals) is: Hexagonal Close Packed Face-Centered Cubic (sometimes called Cubic Close Packed) Body Centered Cubic I did a quick search and found this site which may help a little: http://www.chemistry.ohio-state.edu/...754/str_cp.htm You'll have to scroll down to nearly the bottom to see the table of elements (more common elements, not inclusive). From memory, Be (beryllium), when it oxidizes is highly TOXIC. Similar with Cadmium. Out of the list for HCP, magnesium, zinc, and titanium would be "the safer" metals to work with. Magnesium and Zinc oxidize very easily, so titanium may be the best to "work with". Of course, remember that nearly all "metals" are alloys. Metallurgically speaking, it is nearly impossible to have a "pure" metal. Impurities and/or alloying elements change the structure and properties (physical, mechanical, etc.). Surely you can combine this with the torsion research you're doing... Hope this helps, sorry if redundant. Art