Problems with CERN?

[idiit]

I'll wager my Cap'n Krunch Decoder Ring that this is not the truth. Someone is messing with us. Perhaps they are amused at how much gibberish they can get us to give serious consideration to. I doubt however that their motives are simply amusement.

^ that's the fun part. who wants to know in advance? ruins the surprise.

[idiit]

That is not Patty Brassard

correct. pattie's pic is shown at 45:01 in the 4th video. the credits have it wrong. grandma 13 is Karen. brassard is the inside person at cern providing the screen shots of cern melting down.



^ the geyser they thought was a sail boat sail in the distance was much larger. 2:59 part 4 shows the geyser.

By the way, the real CERN has concluded its experiments for this year on small particles, and is now gearing up for its experiments with heavy ions such as lead

correct. and when they went to shooting lead they amped up the kew ( kilowatt electronic voltage) and when they did amp up the voltage the particles couldn't make the turns in the circle, blew out walls, and plasma energy cut a hole 12' x 24' in the containment wall. the plasma cut an underground water line and this water super heated by the plasma voltage created the geyser. one plasma beam exited the skylight of a nearby hospital and methane flames ( torch) shot out the top of the hospital. lots of deaths from this incident at the hospital.

human's are manifestors. without belief a human cannot manifest. I iirc this is in the last 20 minutes of the bases 53 1,2,3 video.

a pes

[ThePythonicCow]

A post with what appears to me to be more reliable information regarding CERN right now: CERN Explosion? Nuclear Fires? Do Not Fall For the PSYOP!.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by idiit (here)
^ the geyser they though was a sail boat sail in the distance was much larger.

This "geyser" is the Jet d'Eau. Five hundred litres (110 gallons/132 gallons US) of water per second are jetted to an altitude of 140 metres (459 feet) All images I've seen are consistent with those numbers. Do you have any images that aren't?

[idiit]

A post with what appears to me to be more reliable information regarding CERN right now: CERN Explosion? Nuclear Fires? Do Not Fall For the PSYOP!.

ok, what damage if I do fall for it?

This "geyser" is the Jet d'Eau. Five hundred litres (110 gallons/132 gallons US) of water per second are jetted to an altitude of 140 metres (459 feet) All images I've seen are consistent with those numbers. Do you have any images that aren't?

I just edited to add the time stamp: 2:59 video 4. just got there a little late.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by idiit (here)
I just edited to add the time stamp: 2:59 video 4. just got there a little late.

You mean this ?

In both this image and the one I posted above, the geyser seems to be about 10 times taller than the surrounding five story buildings, which is about right for a 459 foot high geyser.

I see no evidence of any other such item.

[ThePythonicCow]

Oh - and one more thing - the following, captured from 9:54 in part 4, is, I believe, the hole that she thinks is evidence of a massive hole blown in CERN. She has not spent much time viewing the large, complex, sensor arrays at CERN.

[idiit]

In both this image and the one I posted above, the geyser seems to be about 10 times taller than the surrounding five story buildings, which is about right for a 459 foot high geyser.

I see no evidence of any other such item.

^ yes, that's the one I was referring to. looks to me like the still frame has much more water in the geyser than the picture shot. the still frame shot is from inside the city. the pic is lake shot. the still frame shot shows a water line to the geyser severed and super heated by the plasma beam (according to the unnamed guy in video 4 around 19:00 min in video 4). he explains a lot of stuff.



ok, I watched the part 4 early today. I watched the 1,2,3 later on this afternoon..there appears to be a third male; miles, Daniel McBolen and a third guy who is not introduced/unnamed at 19:38 into video 4. I think I heard miles call him steve, maybe. I earlier assumed this third guy that comes in for the first time 19:38 into vid 4 was sgt. McBolen. McBolen is in 1,2,3. someone else appears to be in vid 4. this guy (steve?) in vid 4 is off the chart in the egghead dept. and the one I was referring to as near genius. Daniel McBolen is wise; not what I would call genius.

I wonder who the guy in the video #4 is? He's incredible and they didn't even introduce him by name? they don't ever show his face; why I got mislead plus the time span between viewings.

miles announced at the beginning that he was not vouching for the credibility of these guys, he just wanted to get it out there fast and let us decide. he also did not have time to check screen credits to the right persons.

too much synchs with other stuff I've gleaned from my rabbit hole spelunking adventures; especially with kautz-vella and the gaiai/Sophia stuff that claims we are genetic royalty. i'm buying it 'cause they are so well informed on some stuff I follow and they tie a lot of stuff together remarkedly well imo. david icke says look for the threads to weave if it's the truth. this stuff weaves.

Sal ammoniac (Ammonium Chloride) does appear to be the miracle substance:

[RunningDeer]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by idiit (here)
I like to have some fun but this time i want you to know i'm serious about this one; the bases 53 part 4 posted by becky and reposted by ultima thule was outstanding. I've just finished the 4th and have not viewed the first three. Sgt Daniel Brad MacBolan III starts 24:00 in. the first 24 minutes were excellent by Patty Brassard and set the stage for some world class woo woo by MacBolans finish.

That is not Patty Brassard. It is karen-ann-luryk macdonald (bearklanmoher) macdonald, aka Her Grace Karen MacDonald. We know it is not Patty (Pattie) Brassard, because Karen speaks of Pattie in the third person, quite clearly, multiple times. We know it is Karen ... because that name shows clearly on the screen, if viewed full screen on a large monitor.

Pattie Brassard had her big splash here in a 318 post thread here two years ago: Pattie Brassard Interview with Veritas Radio on "The Event"‏, which ended with her debunking.

Now we have someone else claiming to have events at CERN explained to her by Pattie, showing us images of the immense circular instrumentation arrays, claiming that the hole in the middle is evidence of a 12 foot hole blown by a nuclear event, and showing us an image of the geyser in the nearby Lac Laman, which has been there for over a century, claiming it is evidence of an immense underground explosion.

This geyser:

I had a post all ready to go this morning but thought it was off topic about the Pattie Brackett 2013 thread and this video where at 14:03 Myles Johnston asked, “Where does this data come from?” Pattie answered, “This is their (inaudible) project. I hacked into their data base.” She adds a chuckle.

I found it hard to believe that she could hack into the data base of highly sensitive material, share it on the internet and no one comes knocking at her door. It's amazing what she shares on it.

Bases 47 Part 2 with Pattie Brackett (Skype Briefing)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Lq-nYT1fLnc

Published on Sep 28, 2015

Pattie Brackett gives an adhoc briefing on various subjects, commencing with the Genome project. We will have see if this pans out.

This is a adhoc unreshersed lecture, and covers a wide range of important subjects. Its well known Pattie is highly controversial figure, and is a cross dresser. This has been used against what he says. The issue is, is there hard data in this to be of concern for us all. So if you can get past the barriers, possible we can wean something useful out of this.

A scientific mind needs to look carefully at the diagrams and charts used here, and we do need people to respond to this intelligently. A more formal presentation is planned. If this is true, we need to address our concerns and focus properly. The key issue is, Is Pattie correct?. The claims of many nuclear power stations in Europe having melt downs have to be revealed yet..if true. The Background radiation IS increasing when it rains, by about 30-40% in southern England. So Something is up.

Most of the views of a second sun, is atmospheric 'lens' flare, as there is now so much material in the atmosphere.
Now NASA has announced life was (is) on Mars, and it has had fresh water on the surface, such claims by the likes of Pattie Brackett come closer to focus.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by idiit (here)
^ yes, that's the one I was referring to. looks to me like the still frame has much more water in the geyser than the picture shot.

Lighting, camera angle, wind, ...?

It is extraordinarily clear to me that all these geyser pictures could easily be of the same Jet d'Eau, and that the burden is on those telling us (2nd, 3rd or 4th hand) of this extraordinary event to know of the Jet d'Eau and to provide clear evidence why the images they show are not that, rather than leaving it for us to guess, inconclusively.

Some of us fall for hoaxes too easily, I'm afraid. Such does not well serve our search for better understanding.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by RunningDeer (here)
I had a post all ready to go this morning but thought it was off topic about the Pattie Brackett 2013 thread and this video where at 14:03 Myles Johnston asked, “Where does this data come from?” Pattie answered, “This is their (inaudible) project. I hacked into their data base.” She adds a chuckle.

I found it hard to believe that she could hack into the data base of highly sensitive material, share it on the internet and no one comes knocking at her door. It's amazing what she shares on it.

Bases 47 Part 2 with Pattie Brackett (Skype Briefing)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Lq-nYT1fLnc

At 6:28 into that video, the following text appears on one of her slides:

Likewise a protonated cytosine can form two hoogsteen h bonds to the guanine with
g-c pair, resulting in a base triplet isomorphous to the t-a-t.

The unique Hoogsteen hydrogen-bonding patterns of guanine and adenine provide for
specificity similar to the watson-crick models.

Doing a Google search for the text "protonated cytosine can form two hoogsteen h bonds to the guanine with g-c pair, resulting in a base triplet isomorphous", from that slide's text, shows as the third search result:

I'd have to pay $9.95 www.coursehero.com to view the entire document, which is not worth it to me.

But it seems likely to me that this is one of the documents that Pattie Brackett is using. The entire document is a 12 page pdf, class notes for CHEM 4461, Spring 2008, from the school "Lamar".

My credibility rating for Pattie Bassard/Brackett remains approximately zero.

[RunningDeer]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by RunningDeer (here)
I had a post all ready to go this morning but thought it was off topic about the Pattie Brackett 2013 thread and this video where at 14:03 Myles Johnston asked, “Where does this data come from?” Pattie answered, “This is their (inaudible) project. I hacked into their data base.” She adds a chuckle.

I found it hard to believe that she could hack into the data base of highly sensitive material, share it on the internet and no one comes knocking at her door. It's amazing what she shares on it.

Bases 47 Part 2 with Pattie Brackett (Skype Briefing)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Lq-nYT1fLnc

At 6:28 into that video, the following text appears on one of her slides:

Likewise a protonated cytosine can form two hoogsteen h bonds to the guanine with
g-c pair, resulting in a base triplet isomorphous to the t-a-t.

The unique Hoogsteen hydrogen-bonding patterns of guanine and adenine provide for
specificity similar to the watson-crick models.

Doing a Google search for the text "protonated cytosine can form two hoogsteen h bonds to the guanine with g-c pair, resulting in a base triplet isomorphous", from that slide's text, shows as the third search result:

I'd have to pay $9.95 www.coursehero.com to view the entire document, which is not worth it to me.

But it seems likely to me that this is one of the documents that Pattie Brackett is using. The entire document is a 12 page pdf, class notes for CHEM 4461, Spring 2008, from the school "Lamar".

My credibility rating for Pattie Bassard/Brackett remains approximately zero.

Oh man, thank you, . That's the answer I was looking for... How the heck can she come up with all this stuff?

I downloaded Miss Pattie’s video yesterday. Over last evening and this morning I kept stopping and going back to it. That should have been a clue. I listened all the way to 43:26 out of the 1:05:57 video.

I stopped when she said that when they built the pyramid at Giza, they distorted the world’s merkaba. Say what? How the heck can she come up with all this stuff? And say it with such authority and conviction? And why does her name sound familiar. That’s when I ran an Avalon search.

[Constance]

Posted by idiit (here)

Sal ammoniac (Ammonium Chloride) does appear to be the miracle substance:

Hi Idiit

I've had a look-see around what Karen McDonald and Pattie Brassard have posted regarding Ammonium Chloride.

I'm very curious to hear what your thoughts are around it and/or any other data you may care to share here?

[idiit]

^

Sal ammoniac (Ammonium Chloride)

there are several topics introduced by the unnamed guy in video 4 that deserve their own thread. this Ammonium Chloride stuff is definitely one that should get its own thread.

let me repeat: video 4 tek chat is a gold vein of golden nuggets. we can investigate every deserving nugget in its own thread and let the members comment. I am going to review all the videos again and again until I can wrap my head around this nugget dense composite via the 4 videos ( possibly more to come). I look and look and look for just one nugget like these and we've got ourselves a "potato patch".

http://www.ourstate.com/north-carolina-gold-rush/

[Clear Light]

Posted by Paul (here)
Oh - and one more thing - the following, captured from 9:54 in part 4, is, I believe, the hole that she thinks is evidence of a massive hole blown in CERN. She has not spent much time viewing the large, complex, sensor arrays at CERN.

Yup, it does look awfully like this one from CERN Tracker detector :



Ha ! Evidence of damage at CERN ? Ha !

[Flash]

Ok so

Proponent of problems with CERN, Brassard and the other one, credibility = zero

The fountain has been there for more than a century.

We have no pic of the Inside of Cern being damaged

Finally, they are starting new experiment with lead.

SO......

No problems with CERN (at least for the moment, if there is some, it is not the destruction of CERN)

Case closed. For this thread. IMO. Debunking completed.

[Becky]

Well thanks Flash for wrapping up the mystery and closing my thread...I can't help feeling that you haven't got the full picture just yet. But hey....at this stage it's just a feeling, and you clearly like hard evidence.

I've appreciated everyone's input into this thread and sorry I didn't have more time to contribute as my work life is too damn busy at the moment for me to spare more than 5 minutes here and there on Avalon at the moment.

I totally agree that some things may have become exaggerated, and the testimonies from the Bases videos are not 100% accurate, and I loved the fab'n funny 'black hole' video that Rocky_Shorz posted on page 2. But I do feel strongly that something had happened to Cern last weekend*, and that current data being displayed is not the truth. Well we shall see what comes to light sooner or later...

* edited to add...a couple of weekends ago - where does the time fly?

[Flash]

lol
I did not intent to close your thread, never even tought of it, although I must admit it does look like it. So, sorry, i was just writing fast my own conclusions. No ill intent here.

Also, yes, something may have happened there, but, we don't have much to base ourselve on, except for obvious fake testimonies. So, we have to wait for something else to come up so that we can find out if there was any truth to an accident at CERN. Secrecy being, if there was, we might never know. But i think that if there was, the accident must have been small, otherwise something would have leaked through - too many people from all over the world working there, not sworn to secrecy.

Posted by Becky (here)
Well thanks Flash for wrapping up the mystery and closing my thread...I can't help feeling that you haven't got the full picture just yet. But hey....at this stage it's just a feeling, and you clearly like hard evidence.

I've appreciated everyone's input into this thread and sorry I didn't have more time to contribute as my work life is too damn busy at the moment for me to spare more than 5 minutes here and there on Avalon at the moment.

I totally agree that some things may have become exaggerated, and the testimonies from the Bases videos are not 100% accurate, and I loved the fab'n funny 'black hole' video that Rocky_Shorz posted on page 2. But I do feel strongly that something had happened to Cern last weekend*, and that current data being displayed is not the truth. Well we shall see what comes to light sooner or later...

* edited to add...a couple of weekends ago - where does the time fly?

[Becky]

Posted by Flash (here)
lol
I did not intent to close your thread, never even tought of it, although I must admit it does look like it. So, sorry, i was just writing fast my own conclusions. No ill intent here.

Also, yes, something may have happened there, but, we don't have much to base ourselve on, except for obvious fake testimonies. So, we have to wait for something else to come up so that we can find out if there was any truth to an accident at CERN. Secrecy being, if there was, we might never know. But i think that if there was, the accident must have been small, otherwise something would have leaked through - too many people from all over the world working there, not sworn to secrecy.

Posted by Becky (here)
Well thanks Flash for wrapping up the mystery and closing my thread...I can't help feeling that you haven't got the full picture just yet. But hey....at this stage it's just a feeling, and you clearly like hard evidence.

I've appreciated everyone's input into this thread and sorry I didn't have more time to contribute as my work life is too damn busy at the moment for me to spare more than 5 minutes here and there on Avalon at the moment.

I totally agree that some things may have become exaggerated, and the testimonies from the Bases videos are not 100% accurate, and I loved the fab'n funny 'black hole' video that Rocky_Shorz posted on page 2. But I do feel strongly that something had happened to Cern last weekend*, and that current data being displayed is not the truth. Well we shall see what comes to light sooner or later...

* edited to add...a couple of weekends ago - where does the time fly?

Ok thanks Flash :-) and yes we haven't got to the truth yet with this situation, but no vast black holes just yet lol

[6pounder]

Idk if that was said already but on Simon parkes monthly newsletter he explains pretty much what happened.