Posted by boutreality
(here)
-For all those that may find this information useful. I just see no use in getting lost in the mire of argument. Take it or leave it. Maybe it's of use to some. It is to me.
For many in forums of this theme, the tact appears to be argument and defense, ostensibly under the guise of "vetting" the information provided. If that's what some want to do I wouldn't dream to stop them.
However it has pronounced and developed into a pattern of behavior I characterize briefly as follows without any intent to target you or any specific PA member:
1. Post with "new" information, usually little more than a newly ordered synthesis of disparate pieces of info that can be found elsewhere, sometimes featuring a larger proportion of things that were not heard before.
2. Follow up post with request (even demand in some cases) for source of the information. -I've taken to responding to this post, as it is customary by now, with "Take it or leave it," or some variation of the same.
3. Follow up post (usually from a different user) that espouses the generally accepted idea of the topic. In this case that post was provided by Curious77, nothing personal there, it just fits the pattern and the previous listed feature (#2) was provided here by Kano.
(I'm sure you're a decent person with reasons of your own and I do not seek to call those into question.)
The overall effect of this mode of interchange represents, to my mind, a process that works against our collective efforts to discover what is actually at work behind the scenes.
If any individual reader, of their own accord, decides to look elsewhere for information that supports or speaks against my contentions, that's great. Such an endeavor would only increase the likelihood that we, as a collective of like-minded individuals, will bring further into focus the network of nefarious intent that holds control over Earth's population.
I do hope this sufficiently satisfies whatever criteria you find acceptable to either move on from this thread or offer supporting or detracting information, the more substantial the better, as those are the interchanges I (hopefully we) would like to pursue.
Be Well