Simon Parkes update 2016-sep-04: Connecting Consciousness

[PathWalker]

Sep 04 2016 Radio Show with Simon Parkes:

Interview starts 03:30

Download link 29Mb: http://www.wolfspiritradio.com/audio...Parkes_QA1.mp3

New and updates:
- Ater interview with Kerry Cassidy, Got police checkup that he is OK, police was warned about him.
- Assume it is about the Clinton clone, and the soul transfer tech
- Assume he is guarded and watched, while there is strong opposition
- Thanking his supporters
- The rumbling has started at the end of Aug begin of Sep

The rest are excellent spiritual Q&A with Simon,
Highly suggested listening.

[Chester]

Pathwalker, are you aware of the multitude of issues surrounding Simon and his "counseling" habits, routines and client abuse?

If so, how are you, with good conscience, able to continue to promote Simon to the public?

I really want to know.

[EarthMan]

Hi PathWalker,

Thank you for your post I always find the information Simon gives very interesting.

Some posts on this site regarding the information Simon offers can come across as quite insulting towards him. I hope this thread will not go the same way.

Let’s respect everybody even if we don't agree with the information they offer.

[BMJ]

Hi Sam Hunter and Greybeard there is a specific thread "Our experience with Simon Parkes as a counselor" for people whom want to endless criticise Simon Parkes if you wish to do take your issues then go and express them there.

And yet again thank you again for reiterating yet again your thoughts on Simon Parkes.

[greybeard]

Posted by EarthMan (here)
Hi PathWalker,

Thank you for your post I always find the information Simon gives very interesting.

Some posts on this site regarding the information Simon offers can come across as quite insulting towards him. I hope this thread will not go the same way.

Let’s respect everybody even if we don't agree with the information they offer.

With respect it was not so much the information that Simon gave but his treatment of some members who went to him for help.
Perhaps you could check and see what Bill Ryan said about him on that particular thread.

Being insulting is one thing, What Simon was said to have done and that is first hand from the OP of that particular thread, is far short of any standard required for therapy.
Perhaps some one could post a link to that thread and in particular Bill's post.

Chris

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by BMJ (here)
Hi Sam Hunter and Greybeard there is a specific thread "Our experience with Simon Parkes as a counselor" for people whom want to endless criticise Simon Parkes if you wish to do take your issues then go and express them there.

And yet again thank you again for reiterating yet again your thoughts on Simon Parkes.

I had not even posted or thanked anyone on this thread before you mentioned my name.
I was not going to thank anyone or enter into anything on this thread as I have the greatest respect for Pathwalker who was of great assistance to me in the past.
Chris

[Citizen No2]

Everybody is free to listen to whomever they choose. That's the beauty of choice.

Should you decide to listen to a liar, plagiarist, fantasist and manipulator then that is your choice too.

But............ But, when the sh*te comes down the pipe, do not complain of the smell.


Regards.

[Chester]

Posted by BMJ (here)
Hi Sam Hunter and Greybeard there is a specific thread "Our experience with Simon Parkes as a counselor" for people whom want to endless criticise Simon Parkes if you wish to do take your issues then go and express them there.

And yet again thank you again for reiterating yet again your thoughts on Simon Parkes.

My issue was not directly with Simon Parkes. My issue is with fellow members of the same "alternative community..." - a community that has no apparatus in place for protecting the vulnerable when, in extreme cases (this being by far the most extreme), perhaps we might consider how our individual roles impact the vulnerable.

If you knew (like I do) folks who have been directly hurt by this man and were a caring member of this community, you might understand there is no mechanism that does this other than ourselves.

If Simon did the right thing and stepped aside while pursuing some serious counseling and then returned and thereafter demonstrated the integrity equal to his exposure in the community, I would be the first to support him and would be defending him for doing the right thing.

[RunningDeer]

Posted by greybeard (here)
Perhaps some one could post a link to that thread and in particular Bill's post.
Chris

Alberto e Daniela's Thread: Our experience with Simon Parkes as a counselor

These are most of Bill’s posts from the thread:

• Post #9
  
• Post #31
  
• Post #79
  
• Post #90
  
• Post #148
  
• Post #196
  
• Post #242
  
• Post #256
• Post #258
• Post #274
• Post #278
• Post #292
• Post #295
• Post #317

[Spellbound]

Posted by RunningDeer (here)

Posted by greybeard (here)
Perhaps some one could post a link to that thread and in particular Bill's post.
Chris

Alberto e Daniela's Thread: Our experience with Simon Parkes as a counselor

These are most of Bill’s posts from the thread:

• Post #9
  
• Post #31
  
• Post #79
  
• Post # 90
  
• Post #148
  
• Post #196
  
• Post #242
  
• Post #256

Wow!! I've often wondered what Bill's impression of Simon was. That answers that.

Dave - Toronto

[onawah]

I think it would be very helpful if we could keep the threads about Simon separate according to whether the subject is about whistleblower information, or about counseling.
However dismally Simon may (or may not) have failed as a therapist, he is also still a whistleblower, and it appears that a lot of people who are just waking up are benefiting from the information that he shares.
It may not all be accurate, but that isn't at all unusual in whistleblowers, as we have seen over the years.
The important thing is that there continue to be whistleblowers, and that they have places like this forum where we can examine what they offer and come to our own conclusions without being attacked with judgements, bullying, sarcasm, etc.
Avalon is one of the few places where people can find such information, and where some semblance of civility and abiding by rules is maintained enough so that newcomers and observers are not put off by divisiveness.
That is worthy of safe guarding, in my opinion, and I have been an active member here since 2010 and have seen a lot of high and low points on this forum, which I think has a lot to do with how respectful members are of each other and of the general ground rules.

[Shannon]

Posted by onawah (here)
I think it would be very helpful if we could keep the threads about Simon separate according to whether the subject is about whistleblower information, or about counseling.
However dismally Simon may (or may not) have failed as a therapist, he is also still a whistleblower, and it appears that a lot of people who are just waking up are benefiting from the information that he shares.
It may not all be accurate, but that isn't at all unusual in whistleblowers, as we have seen over the years.
The important thing is that there continue to be whistleblowers, and that they have places like this forum where we can examine what they offer and come to our own conclusions without being attacked with judgements, bullying, sarcasm, etc.
Avalon is one of the few places where people can find such information, and where some semblance of civility and abiding by rules is maintained enough so that newcomers and observers are not put off by divisiveness.
That is worthy of safe guarding, in my opinion, and I have been an active member here since 2010 and have seen a lot of high and low points on this forum, which I think has a lot to do with how respectful members are of each other and of the general ground rules.

He may be a whistleblower to you, but he is not one to me.

What did he blow the whistle on anyway ?

[onawah]

And that's exactly what I'm talking about, from a Mod no less.

[Shannon]

Posted by onawah (here)
And that's exactly what I'm talking about, from a Mod no less.

I'm allowed to have an opinion, onawah.

Maybe you can answer the same question sam posed to pathwalker...but let me edit it...

onawah, you are aware of the multitude of issues surrounding Simon and his "counseling" habits, routines and client abuse.

so, how are you, with good conscience, able to continue to promote Simon to the public?

I really want to know.

[Andre]

Posted by Sam Hunter (here)

My issue was not directly with Simon Parkes. My issue is with fellow members of the same "alternative community..." - a community that has no apparatus in place for protecting the vulnerable when, in extreme cases (this being by far the most extreme), perhaps we might consider how our individual roles impact the vulnerable.

If you knew (like I do) folks who have been directly hurt by this man and were a caring member of this community, you might understand there is no mechanism that does this other than ourselves.

If Simon did the right thing and stepped aside while pursuing some serious counseling and then returned and thereafter demonstrated the integrity equal to his exposure in the community, I would be the first to support him and would be defending him for doing the right thing.

Sam, please take your criticisms of Simon to the correct thread that has extensively covered the issues you raise. There are a lot of us here who are interested in what Simon has to say. Thanks.

[onawah]

Everyone has an opinion, Shannon, it's how they are expressed that often makes all the difference.
IF you really want to know my opinions, there are numerous posts from me on the other threads where this debate has been ongoing for weeks now.
I got very tired of expressing my opinion there and being ignored for the most part.
And I have no intention of being drawn into it once again. As far as I am concerned, it's gotten very old, and I'm amazed that it is still ongoing.

Posted by Shannon (here)

Posted by onawah (here)
And that's exactly what I'm talking about, from a Mod no less.

I'm allowed to have an opinion, onawah.

Maybe you can answer the same question sam posed to pathwalker...but let me edit it...

onawah, you are aware of the multitude of issues surrounding Simon and his "counseling" habits, routines and client abuse.

so, how are you, with good conscience, able to continue to promote Simon to the public?

I really want to know.

[Shannon]

Posted by onawah (here)
Everyone has an opinion, Shannon, it's how they are expressed that often makes all the difference.
IF you really want to know my opinions, there are numerous posts from me on the other threads where this debate has been ongoing for weeks now.
I got very tired of expressing my opinion there and being ignored for the most part.
And I have no intention of being drawn into it once again. As far as I am concerned, it's gotten very old, and I'm amazed that it is still ongoing.

Posted by Shannon (here)

Posted by onawah (here)
And that's exactly what I'm talking about, from a Mod no less.

I'm allowed to have an opinion, onawah.

Maybe you can answer the same question sam posed to pathwalker...but let me edit it...

onawah, you are aware of the multitude of issues surrounding Simon and his "counseling" habits, routines and client abuse.

so, how are you, with good conscience, able to continue to promote Simon to the public?

I really want to know.

Thing is I didn't ask for your opinion. I wanted to know how you ( or anyone )can condone his behavior.

[Andre]

Posted by Shannon (here)

Posted by onawah (here)
And that's exactly what I'm talking about, from a Mod no less.

I'm allowed to have an opinion, onawah. Maybe you can answer the same question sam posed to pathwalker...but let me edit it...
onawah, you are aware of the multitude of issues surrounding Simon and his "counseling" habits, routines and client abuse. so, how are you, with good conscience, able to continue to promote Simon to the public? I really want to know.

I completely agree with Onawah.

Shannon, your remarks sound like you have given yourself the task of attempting to censor posts relating to Simon Parkes.

May I suggest that you allow others to listen to what Simon has to say without attempting to put a lid on his interviews. If you are not interested, go to threads that interest you. It's really that simple.

Many thanks!

[RunningDeer]

Posted by onawah (here)
IF you really want to know my opinions, there are numerous posts from me on the other threads where this debate has been ongoing for weeks now.
I got very tired of expressing my opinion there and being ignored for the most part.

onawah, to be fair here's the link to the thread you refer to - Our Experience With Simon Parkes as a contactee (split from "Our experience with Simon Parkes as a counselor" thread)

There are sooooo many Simon threads, it’s hard to keep track. I’d be one of those that didn’t respond to your postings, only because I’ve overdosed on Simon Parkes, whistle blowers, super soldiers, contactees and those blue whatcha-ma-call-its.

Anyone is welcome to removed this post.

[onawah]

For that matter, I didn't ask for your opinion either, Shannon, which apparently you didn't notice.
Did I ever say I condoned Simon's behavior?
I am not going to repeat myself--everything I've written on the subject is in those discussions from weeks ago.
I see absolutely no point at all in hashing it all over again.
And it's not really about Simon, it's about how we conduct ourselves on this forum.
The request in my post https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...post1096239was was clear enough, and I see no point in repeating that either.
From a Mod, especially, I would think it would be honored, inasmuch as it is in accordance with the rules of this forum, as I have understood them.

Posted by Shannon (here)

Posted by onawah (here)
Everyone has an opinion, Shannon, it's how they are expressed that often makes all the difference.
IF you really want to know my opinions, there are numerous posts from me on the other threads where this debate has been ongoing for weeks now.
I got very tired of expressing my opinion there and being ignored for the most part.
And I have no intention of being drawn into it once again. As far as I am concerned, it's gotten very old, and I'm amazed that it is still ongoing.

Posted by Shannon (here)

Posted by onawah (here)
And that's exactly what I'm talking about, from a Mod no less.

I'm allowed to have an opinion, onawah.

Maybe you can answer the same question sam posed to pathwalker...but let me edit it...

onawah, you are aware of the multitude of issues surrounding Simon and his "counseling" habits, routines and client abuse.

so, how are you, with good conscience, able to continue to promote Simon to the public?

I really want to know.

Thing is I didn't ask for your opinion. I wanted to know how you ( or anyone )can condone his behavior.

[Chester]

Posted by Andre (here)

Posted by Shannon (here)

Posted by onawah (here)
And that's exactly what I'm talking about, from a Mod no less.

I'm allowed to have an opinion, onawah. Maybe you can answer the same question sam posed to pathwalker...but let me edit it...
onawah, you are aware of the multitude of issues surrounding Simon and his "counseling" habits, routines and client abuse. so, how are you, with good conscience, able to continue to promote Simon to the public? I really want to know.

I completely agree with Onawah.

Shannon, your remarks sound like you have given yourself the task of attempting to censor posts relating to Simon Parkes.

May I suggest that you allow others to listen to what Simon has to say without attempting to put a lid on his interviews. If you are not interested, go to threads that interest you. It's really that simple.

Many thanks!

Posted by Andre (here)
Sam, please take your criticisms of Simon to the correct thread that has extensively covered the issues you raise. There are a lot of us here who are interested in what Simon has to say. Thanks.

People can go to Youtube and search Simon Parkes and listen to whatever they want.

Just like people can call on the community to support what essentially is no different than an intervention for a drug/alcohol abuser. Drug/alcohol abusers harm others, harm those who are vulnerable.

This is what my posts and posts of others is about. It's not about listening to Simon Parkes. It's a message to those who continue to promote Simon Parkes when Simon has yet to take responsibility for his behaviors... behaviors which have been blatantly harmful to many and in forms far more than simply blowing off clients and suggests the likelihood he has not dealt with his own issues which are foundational to these behaviors. It's about stopping the grand standing so the vulnerable don't end up like so many over the last few years. Many who he mined from sites like this by the way.

And threads like this raise the odds he mines successfully.

How do so many of you not get this? Is it an ego thing because of prior support where folks can't admit they may have made an error in their prior support so they have to keep on doing it despite the obvious?

Let me try this one... Why would someone promote someone else who has spiritual messages to deliver? Probably because they think these spiritual messages would be helpful for others and perhaps we would all end up sharing a better world.

Well, it works the other way too. Promoting someone who mines the very community for the vulnerable for personal exploitation under the guise of "soul readings" which, in some cases, has caused great harm to these vulnerable should stop. No? It surely doesn't make the world a better place or does it?

When are folks going to start considering the reputation of this community? When are folks going to start considering the importance of the reputation of the forum you are a member of? When will it become clear that not everyone that comes to this site has been around the block enough in life to smell a rat?... is in the best position to protect themselves? Do you promote day care facilities run by priests of a well known religion I won't name but most readers have a good idea as to what I am referring to? Do we need the Boston Globe to blow it all wide open for folks around here to get a clue?