The Law of One

[Anchor]

Posted by OneSeeker (here)
By the way, did you know that Jon Peniel has been "announced" by Edgar Cayce ?

Not quite correct. Edgar was channelling Halaliel at the time - which I think I remember was the trickster who they stopped working with once they twigged onto the doom and gloom stuff he was spouting. All the EC Earth changes stuff was finished "I Halaliel have spoken"

http://www.think-aboutit.com/Spiritual/edgar_cayce.htm

refers to this in part.

[mrkumamon]

I've read them

[Nela]

I have read it a few times, in different periods. Without any intention to define how much of the material is true, I can state that
it is very unusual and multilayered. Each time I approched those books with different level of perception (in different times),
I have found different information. The consistancy is there, but each time I have seen bigger and bigger picture.

[Fury Ra]

Posted by TimelessDimensions (here)
I'm wondering how many of you have read the Law of One from start to finish?



( Here's a link for those who haven't heard of the Law of One - http://www.lawofone.info )

I got pretty close I had a dream I should read it, so I did and almost finished, not sure why I stopped though? Blame it on free will I suppose ;-) !!!!

I got alot out of it though, as I have come to believe that energy is are primary make up, not protien sacks and plasma !

[Fury Ra]

Posted by TimelessDimensions (here)
Yes I also feel that David Wilcock's interpretation of the Law of One is very distorted, Wilcock is obsessed with certain minor details while he ignores the overall philosophy and spiritual discipline communicated by Ra. Wilcock has created a cult of UFO disclosure - he rouses up his followers to hold their breathe and wait for that "glorious" day when Governments finally disclose that UFOs exist... Oo I think I almost had an orgasm... NOT!!

I have alot of respect for David Wilcock as I do Bill Ryan and Kerry Cassidy, but.......THIS MADE ME LAUGH ;-)
It would be a sad day, the day we lose the ability to laugh at ourselves thats for sure ! Plus disclosure has already happened, forget about the Government disclousing anything.

[sambience]

I've read it and it struck me as being absolutely authentic and true. I find the spiritual teachings in the series to be spot on and most valuable. In regards to David Wilcock's work, I think he has done a fantastic job and a great service in compiling so much cutting edge scientific data that supports and correlates much of what the Law Of One offers.

[Hiram]

Posted by John (here)
Not quite correct. Edgar was channelling Halaliel at the time - which I think I remember was the trickster who they stopped working with once they twigged onto the doom and gloom stuff he was spouting. All the EC Earth changes stuff was finished "I Halaliel have spoken"

http://www.think-aboutit.com/Spiritual/edgar_cayce.htm

refers to this in part.

Absolutely correct John.

[E.Yes]

I read it on my phone on bus rides to work. Except book one, which I have the hard copy of. After I finished I was exctited to find further material channeled via Carla Rueckert and L/L Research. Seems the language of so much of what channeled or "downloaded" (Ashayana Deane's word) material I've seen uses similar or exactly the same language, which I find fascinating, if not completely energizing. Lisa Renee, Patricia Cota-Robles, who else?

I found Camelot and Ra via Wilcock, whom I found by searching for 2012, ETs, and ET channeling so I have to give him a lot of credit. I still follow his work closely but find his ego to be at once hilariously huge yet actually kind of kept in check. It seems to come from genuine excitement that he's written a "masterpiece" book or music and videos of "professional" quality and I think it's kind of sweet.

I am certainly confused by his own channeling of Ra. Really, can he just do that? L/L Research was put through so much physically and energetically and waarned by Ra that any further contact is life-threatening under circumstances other than those they had been using and because of that never attempted again. So David just turns it on in 2 seconds using a funny voice and the same phrases?

And definitely his DISCLOSURE IS IMMINENT messages have worn themselves out. Does Obama even know ETs exist?

Anyway, RA RA SIS BOOM BA!

ps, some video of Carla and Don just a few years before the Ra contact!: https://youtube.com/watch?v=uO0DT40csVo

[Unicorn]

I`ve read the RA Material, and I recommend it. In my case, it also changed my views, or I would say made me "remember". Worth reading.

Love & Light,

Unicorn

[write4change]

I want to thank you for this thread. I found the pdf version and started reading it. I am on page 105. Daily I am given things to ruminate on which is greatly expanding the boundaries of my thought.

[Anchor]

Posted by E.Yes (here)
I am certainly confused by his own channeling of Ra. Really, can he just do that?

He isnt doing it in the same way. So far as I can understand it, DW's Higherself is has "vibrational similarity" to that of Edgar Cayce (a Ra "fragment")- so when he channels it is not the entire social memory complex in one hit. With Carla, she was out cold, and the questions were asked by the others of the group, she was just a meat puppet for Ra who was controlling her yellow ray (chemical) body complex.

(BTW: Carla's group still does channel Ra, indirectly through Q'Uo [ https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...ch-Who-is-Q-uo ] )

David's version is IMHO however still good stuff. He doesnt do this much anymore - he seems all about sensational revelations these days and being seen to be a key player.

If you have the 8 or 9 readings that DW did professionally for people and subsequently released, then I think you will find they have the ring of truth about them. What ticks a lot of people off about them is that you had to buy them. I did and don't regret it for a moment.

[eris23]

Something about John Peneil's book resonated with me. However, I am VERY skeptical of any channeled materiel. Admittedly I have not read much channeled materiel and have never checked out the RA information. I think that David Willcock has some insight to share that is worth hearing but I am also skeptical of some of his claims.

[E.Yes]

Posted by John (here)
He isnt doing it in the same way. So far as I can understand it, DW's Higherself is has "vibrational similarity" to that of Edgar Cayce (a Ra "fragment")- so when he channels it is not the entire social memory complex in one hit. With Carla, she was out cold, and the questions were asked by the others of the group, she was just a meat puppet for Ra who was controlling her yellow ray (chemical) body complex.

(BTW: Carla's group still does channel Ra, indirectly through Q'Uo [ https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...ch-Who-is-Q-uo ] )

David's version is IMHO however still good stuff. He doesnt do this much anymore - he seems all about sensational revelations these days and being seen to be a key player.

If you have the 8 or 9 readings that DW did professionally for people and subsequently released, then I think you will find they have the ring of truth about them. What ticks a lot of people off about them is that you had to buy them. I did and don't regret it for a moment.

I'm looking forward to the day that I can afford to pay for those readings (and videos and "Wanderer Awakening.") I have no problem with anybody charging for their information. Especially someone like David who so clearly pours ALL of his energy into this work to astounding end.

I believe that Q'uo is 5th density, while Ra is 6th. I haven't read as much Q'uo as I'd like, but you can sense the difference in densities. Ra is like a college professor while Q'uo is a blissed out surfer.

[Anchor]

Posted by E.Yes (here)
I believe that Q'uo is 5th density, while Ra is 6th. I haven't read as much Q'uo as I'd like, but you can sense the difference in densities. Ra is like a college professor while Q'uo is a blissed out surfer.

Almost... Q'uo is a combination of Latwii (of 5th density) and Ra (of 6th) if you follow my link in my preceding post there is a post where Q'uo explains it themselves. Latwii "steps down" Ra for Carla.

Posted by E.Yes (here)
ps, some video of Carla and Don just a few years before the Ra contact!: https://youtube.com/watch?v=uO0DT40csVo

WOW!

Thanks so much for this link. I didn't know about that youtube channel at all - that interview is amazing - watching now.

[exponentialist]

Posted by E.Yes (here)
I believe that Q'uo is 5th density, while Ra is 6th. I haven't read as much Q'uo as I'd like, but you can sense the difference in densities. Ra is like a college professor while Q'uo is a blissed out surfer.

Thanks for the belly laugh E.Yes!!!!!

To respond to the OT I've read all five books many times. If I could only take one book with me to an island I'd have a problem - I'd want all five.

Not sure if one could argue that Wilcock's most recent work is consistent with the RA Material, but I still keep up with him.

[E.Yes]

Posted by John (here)
Almost... Q'uo is a combination of Latwii and Ra if you follow my link in my preceding post there is a post where Q'uo explains it themselves. Latwii "steps down" Ra for Carla.

Spoke too soon, didn't follow the link and forgot about that detail. Thanks!

[Hiram]

I have read it completely--The Law of One.


I resonate strongly with it. Most interestingly, Ra indicated the most probably time for the Harvest was in 2011. Of course much has changed in the timeline in the last 30 years since this was written--and Ra states there is no way to know the exact hour.. But look whats begun to happen with the animals? Food for thought if nothing else.

[astrid]

Posted by Hiram (here)
I have read it completely--The Law of One.


I resonate strongly with it. Most interestingly, Ra indicated the most probably time for the Harvest was in 2011. Of course much has changed in the timeline in the last 30 years since this was written--and Ra states there is no way to know the exact hour.. But look whats begun to happen with the animals? Food for thought if nothing else.

I loved the Law of One material also it was a big part of my awakening.

I wonder what Carla has to say about all this, she does have a website an a forum, it might be worth joining to keep up with the current lines of thinking from her camp...
http://www.bring4th.org/

[leavesoftrees]

Here is a 1978 Interview w/Don Elkins & Carla L. Rueckert


Don Elkins and Carla L. Rueckert gave an interview to a program on an Atlanta TV station in 1978.

Available in five parts on L/L's YouTube channel. Total length 1 hour 11 minutes.

https://youtube.com/user/LLResearch101

The recording has been sitting on a VHS in house for years. Recently it was switched over to DVD by a local company in Louisville. Unfortunately they did not edit the video to improve the quality. They just performed a direct transfer from VHS to DVD. Consequently the quality is a little poor
Enjoy!

[dcflux]

I have read the original LOO many years ago and so much of it, even then, was very helpful for me in my every day life. I absolutely love the material. I have revisited many of the passages from the material as it applied to events in my life at the time and each and every time I did this I learned something new about myself... I learned to make much better choices for myself. I feel that this is an absolute must read. I love the language and the way that the information is presented. I have seen so much in my life change for the better because of it. I still to this day jump back to it when I am pouring over new concepts or looking critically at my behavior to get Ra's learning/teaching. I have read many religious and spiritual texts over the years and many of them have much of the LOO rooted in some fundamental way. It is a great reference for life.

I like to use the original reading and the website that is set up is great: http://www.lawofone.info/

I am :D. I leave you in the love and the light of the One Infinite Creator. Go forth rejoicing in the power and the peace of the One. Adonai.

:D