Taj & Sarah Adams talk to Crrow777 about the moon, space and the nature of reality

[tajgill]

Taj and Sarah talk to Crrow777 about the lunar wave, what is space ? UFO's, space agencies, freemasonry and astronomy, social engineering, the changing of our history and many other topics too. Nyssa joins us in the second hour of the show.

You can find Crrow777 on YouTube at: https://www.youtube.com/Crrow777

And at his website: https://www.crrow777radio.com

Please tune into The Divine Truth Show every Sunday at 6pm est 11pm bst on Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com Studio A.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=WUHtLrO8GFo

[Bill Ryan]

.
Crrow777 (4:31): "I think it's likely that space may be water."

I stopped listening about 25 seconds after that.

If I may say, although of course you mean well, you do the alternative community a harmful disservice by actively promoting this kind of idiocy.

And idiocy it is... he has ABSOLUTELY no idea what he's talking about, but he remains unchallenged by you. Not smart, helpful, or cool.

[tajgill]

The idea that space is a liquid of fluid has been around for a while and not a new theory or concept, here is one of many articles about the superfluid vacuum theory: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...uperfluid.html

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by tajgill (here)
The idea that space is a liquid of fluid has been around for a while and not a new theory or concept, here is one of many articles about the superfluid vacuum theory: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...uperfluid.html

Well, I have to say this (and it's true) — the Daily Mail writer (or, more likely, his page editor) didn't understand what he was writing about when the heading reads "Are we living ‘underwater’?"

There's a very longstanding and interesting debate about the Luminiferous Ether, which is pretty much what's being referred to here. To equate it to 'water' is to completely misunderstand what's being discussed.

If it exists, it's a large scale quantum-level effect, and not the kind of thing one can swim in or see waves in! Crrow777 certainly doesn't understand any part of this.

If you're going to host a valuable radio show, please make sure you research what the guest wants to present, so you can ask good questions. You're representing your audience... your job is to ask questions on their behalf.

You're more than a passive, friendly stage and a microphone. You have a duty and a commitment to the truth, and to help your listeners in their journey towards that. You're actually in the position of a kind of teacher.

And that's a sacred duty. If you take the easy road and sell out on that, you're in danger of being just being a populist, commercial mouthpiece for anyone who happens to want to come along and say anything they like. That's not education... although it might be entertainment.

[tajgill]

Thanks Bill, I value your opinion I'm new to all this so any feedback is much appreciated especially from someone like yourself. I guess this is all a learning process for me, I will do my best to be objective and ask questions that are appropriate. Thanks again.

[Akasha]

I remember this guy from a while back. Here's the "lunar wave" phenomenon he is referring to:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=cCkZLmhl3-I

It looks like an anomaly due to the equipment being used to me.

Care to comment, Carmody (or anyone else with optics knowledge)?

[tajgill]

Crrow777 has analyzed the footage and had a camera expert look it over. The anomolly is localized only to the moon and not the area surrounding the moon. The fact that he pans the camera while the wave occurs also means that it's highly unlikely that it's an optics issue but then I'm not an expert. A lot of other people have filmed the same phenomenon using different camera's as well.

[DNA]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
.
Crrow777 (4:31): "I think it's likely that space may be water."

I stopped listening about 25 seconds after that.

If I may say, although of course you mean well, you do the alternative community a harmful disservice by actively promoting this kind of idiocy.

And idiocy it is... he has ABSOLUTELY no idea what he's talking about, but he remains unchallenged by you. Not smart, helpful, or cool.

Crrow777 is a work in progress as we all are. I believe he has come to some wrong conclusions not the least of which is he seems to be a flat earther, but I'm a firm believer in not throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Crrow777 is an excellent amateur astronomer and his work on the lunar wave is self evident as he is just photographing an incredible phenomenon, that being the lunar wave.
History is chock full of scientists/academics who have made very important individual discoveries while at the same time coming to some very wrong conclusions about their very own work.
Listening to Crrow777 is atleast liberating in terms of hearing the thoughts of someone who has come to the conclusion that along with the Media, education and academia have been lying to us our entire lives, and many of the thoughts he shares are simply exercises in trying to think for yourself and having the guts to discard long time held paradigms.

Posted by Akasha (here)
I remember this guy from a while back. Here's the "lunar wave" phenomenon he is referring to:

It looks like an anomaly due to the equipment being used to me.

Care to comment, Carmody (or anyone else with optics knowledge)?

Croww777's camera was moving and panning when it took the first picture of the lunar wave. Croww777 had stated that if he hadn't set his camera to move and pan when viewing the phenomenon he too would have discarded the anomaly as a technical glitch. So there we are.
I'm of the opinion there seems to be something going on here, the majority of folks who expose themselves to this information come to the conclusion that there may in fact be a large halogram obfuscating and or hiding something on the moon of which there are those who do not wish for us to be able to view.
I'm of the opinion the lunar wave is a real phenomenon.
Also do you folks remember the work that was being done to use gigantic lasers so as to be able to use the Moon as a freaking advertising Billboard.
I was not a fan of this when the information was coming out. But as time would tell the plan never came to fruition. One has to wonder if one can use a laser to write on a halogram.
I think not.
Here is an old NPR article discussing this.
http://www.npr.org/programs/watc/fea...401.lunar.html


LunarCorp
NPR received this confidential diagram of LunarCorp's proposed advertising systemApril 1, 2000 -- According to documents obtained by NPR, a California-based company has developed a powerful laser that can project images on to the surface of the moon.
LunarCorp CEO, Jack Libnitz The company, LunarCorp, was founded three years ago by Jack Libnitz who is best known for convincing the United States government to allow private companies to launch their own satellites. It was in 1986 that Libnitz came up with the idea to project images on to the moon's surface for the purpose of selling advertising. And, now, it looks as though his plan may become a reality.

LunarCorp's laser was developed by a team of engineers and optical physicists lead by Ludo Fisher of the European Space Agency. Fisher says the science to project images on to the moon's surface has been available for more than a decade, but the cost has been prohibitive until now.
Lead Engineer Ludo Fisher Legal experts say LunarCorp's plan is illegal, a violation of the 1969 International Lunar Treaty that banned commercial activity on the moon. Libnitz insists he's not worried about being sued. "I'm only sending an image into space," he says. "The moon just happens to be in the way."

On April 1st, LunarCorp will attempt to project the logo of an undisclosed company on to the moon's surface, which will be in half-moon phase on that day as seen from Earth. If it fails, says Libnitz, the company will try again on April 7th when the moon is full.

[Builder]

Here is a video showing how the atmospheric wake of airplanes can cause such waves:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=kAMNfKwPGas

[DNA]

Posted by Builder (here)
Here is a video showing how the atmospheric wake of airplanes can cause such waves:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=kAMNfKwPGas

The wave is peer reviewed.
There are folks recording the Wave all over the world now, not just Crow777.
There are instances of the Wave being recorded by various people all over the world at the same time.
I seriously doubt an airplane is going to create enough turbulence for someone in Texas and SanDiego to record that same turbulence.

[StandingWave]

I had this to say some time ago over on a thread dedicated to the lunar wave phenomenon:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1002852

I still think the answer is in some form of refractive index change in the atmospheric turbulence between the viewer and the moon.

[Akasha]

Posted by DNA (here)

Posted by Akasha (here)
I remember this guy from a while back. Here's the "lunar wave" phenomenon he is referring to:

It looks like an anomaly due to the equipment being used to me.

Care to comment, Carmody (or anyone else with optics knowledge)?

Croww777's camera was moving and panning when it took the first picture of the lunar wave. Croww777 had stated that if he hadn't set his camera to move and pan when viewing the phenomenon he too would have discarded the anomaly as a technical glitch. So there we are.....

Sorry DNA but I'd argue that we are far from "there". The video only gives the illusion of the wave being solely on the moon due to the surrounding blackness of space which would not allow for the wave / glitch to be visible anywhere except where the background isn't black.

[Akasha]

Watch the following video where The Paulstal Service creates his own "lunar wave" very quickly using Adobe Premiere Pro:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Dz1IYztyk_Y

I just located The Paulstal Service's archive of his YouTube content. Click the link below and then scroll down to video 39 to watch it. That archive is a veritable treasure trove. He wasn't scrubbed from YT for cat videos.

https://archive.org/details/OrlandoShootingHoaxAngelColonDoctorsFullPressConference/Is+the+Moon+a+Hologram_+Crrow777+and+'The+Lunar+Wave'.mp4

[DNA]

Posted by Akasha (here)

Posted by DNA (here)

Posted by Akasha (here)
I remember this guy from a while back. Here's the "lunar wave" phenomenon he is referring to:

It looks like an anomaly due to the equipment being used to me.

Care to comment, Carmody (or anyone else with optics knowledge)?

Croww777's camera was moving and panning when it took the first picture of the lunar wave. Croww777 had stated that if he hadn't set his camera to move and pan when viewing the phenomenon he too would have discarded the anomaly as a technical glitch. So there we are.....

Sorry DNA but I'd argue that we are far from "there". The video only gives the illusion of the wave being solely on the moon due to the surrounding blackness of space which would not allow for the wave / glitch to be visible anywhere except where the background isn't black.

Hi Akasha
You PM'd me and it seems in hope of having a dialogue in regards to the Lunar Wave
You seem to regard the Lunar Wave as a manifestation of the Halographic nature of reality and you seem to propose that all of reality is being affected by the lunar wave rather than just the moon
Your proposition is fine but difficult to prove
I'll tell you where I differ and why
When folks summarize Ingo Swann's "Penetration" it seems that most sum it up as a work of "remote Viewing"
I would not
I would sum up Ingo Swann's "Penetration" as a glimpse into the control structure aliens use to control mankind on earth
The history of the moon is amazing
Ingo Swann and Crow777 spend a lot of time talking about how the astronomers of the 15th and 16th centuries made painstaking drawings and paintings of the moon and of Mars in far greater minute detail than the best of our telescopes and photographic abilities of today
Crow777 himself has quite an amazing telescope, far better than anything those 15th and 16th century astronomers could have dreamed of, and he asks "why can't I see the detail on the moon and mars that those renaissance astronomers were capable of capturing"?
Many of those early astronomers talked of strange lights on the moon
I'm of the opinion that there are those on the moon who do not wish to be observed, I think the moon is an actual planetoid and I think there are those stationed on the moon who use it to their advantage in relation to those of us on earth

[Akasha]

Posted by DNA (here)
.....Hi Akasha
You PM'd me and it seems in hope of having a dialogue in regards to the Lunar Wave
You seem to regard the Lunar Wave as a manifestation of the Halographic nature of reality and you seem to propose that all of reality is being affected by the lunar wave rather than just the moon
Your proposition is fine but difficult to prove.....

Hi DNA,

I don't regard the lunar wave as anything but a hoax created in Adobe Premiere Pro (or similar such software). My preposition is extremely easy to prove as demonstrated by The Paulstal Service in the video I just shared in post 13.

I'm assuming that based on your response you didn't watch the video beyond 4.04, at which point The Paulstal Service steps out of extreme irony mode and then proceeds to show how easy it is to create this seemingly mysterious phenomenon using readily available video editing software - something I suspected as evidenced by my comment in post 6. I just didn't think the "anomoly" I speculated about was actually a purposely inserted one for, possibly, all manner of reasons ranging from lending support to the flat Earth psy-op to lining his pockets through Youtube hits, telescope commissions(?), speaking engagements etc....

ps: what is "Halographic"?

[DNA]

Posted by Akasha (here)

Posted by DNA (here)
.....Hi Akasha
You PM'd me and it seems in hope of having a dialogue in regards to the Lunar Wave
You seem to regard the Lunar Wave as a manifestation of the Halographic nature of reality and you seem to propose that all of reality is being affected by the lunar wave rather than just the moon
Your proposition is fine but difficult to prove.....

Hi DNA,

I don't regard the lunar wave as anything but a hoax created in Adobe Premiere Pro (or similar such software). My preposition is extremely easy to prove as demonstrated by The Paulstal Service in the video I just shared in post 13.

I'm assuming that based on your response you didn't watch the video beyond 4.04, at which point The Paulstal Service steps out of extreme irony mode and then proceeds to show how easy it is to create this seemingly mysterious phenomenon using readily available video editing software - something I suspected as evidenced by my comment in post 6. I just didn't think the "anomoly" I speculated about was actually a purposely inserted one for, possibly, all manner of reasons ranging from lending support to the flat Earth psy-op to lining his pockets through Youtube hits, telescope commissions(?), speaking engagements etc....

ps: what is "Halographic"?

Holographic, it was a typo
Other than that you and I don't really have anything to discuss
This is just one of those things where if you find value cool, and if not that is fine as well

[Akasha]

The Lunar wave is clearly a scam as demonstrated in the video.

"Finding value" in a scam will never be "cool", unless you are Crrrow777 of course. No doubt he has found plenty of value in it.

[DNA]

Posted by Akasha (here)
The Lunar wave is clearly a scam as demonstrated in the video.

"Finding value" in a scam will never be "cool", unless you are Crrrow777 of course. No doubt he has found plenty of value in it.

Just because someone is caught wearing a monkey suit in the woods doesn't discount all of the legitimate sasquatch sightings that have taken place
I think the same applies here
Just because someone has figured out a way to make a video simulation of something, (a simple accomplishment really) does not in any way discount what Crow777 nor the hundreds of people who have recorded this phenomenon have accomplished
Again if you do not find anything of value fine, this is one of those things you need to spend some time on in order to see if it vibes with you or not
Apparently this is something that offends your sensibilities other wise you would have found better things to do with your time then vent on something you purport to find no value in
As for myself I hope you continue with your assertions that there is nothing to this because each time you do you are bumping this thread and in so doing more folks may be made aware of the lunar wave and spend some time studying it for themselves

[Akasha]

I'm confident the majority of those reading this thread will have the intelligence to apply Occam's razor and recognize it for what it truly is .