The Truth about Corey Goode

[WalterBosley]

Unfortunately for her, she's stunningly pretty and the Screw Age world is full of men who will more than gladly tell her how right she is, no matter what ridiculous nonsense she parrots. Unless she's lucky, disillusionment and a jaded perspective may be in her future if she doesn't get a grip.

[Callista]

Some months ago I was watching a video that Teresa released in May 2016, before the Contact in the Desert watershed.

I felt a compassion and connection with her in this video - she was genuine and natural, being honest about herself. She wan't trying to force anything. I really liked her in this video.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=gyPL3O0T6Bw

[Mike]

Posted by WalterBosley (here)
Unfortunately for her, she's stunningly pretty and the Screw Age world is full of men who will more than gladly tell her how right she is, no matter what ridiculous nonsense she parrots. Unless she's lucky, disillusionment and a jaded perspective may be in her future if she doesn't get a grip.

i'm not one of these shallow guys swayed by a woman's beauty (yes i am) and if she were naked in front of me right now and a hot n steamy night all depended upon my agreeing with her, i'd tell her to go to hell in a hand basket (no i wouldnt. i'd agree and have sex with her immediately)

however, i'd publicly deny all of it and resume making fun of her as soon as possible

disclaimer: for those of you that are horrified by all that, keep in mind that i'm about to get killed by a huge hurricane and may not be thinking properly (i am thinking properly, but that was the best excuse i could think of)

moving on...
does her military background make anyone suspicious? it's got my gears going a little bit..

[Chester]

I was able to watch the whole video. I liked the person I watched and listened to. I hope she gets back to this again where she would be able to share about what she went through and what she has learned from her recent adventure.

When I consider her "state hopping" I was thinking military... is she military? Or, is she married to someone in the military?

I do have to add one thing... knowing west Texas like I do, I think she was trying to convince herself not to miss (too much) the beach... but honestly, anyone would miss it compared to something like Odessa, for example... trust me there.

[WalterBosley]

[Bill Ryan]

Folks, we're on public display here. THX.

[Mike]

Sammy, her Dad was military. Sorry, shoulda been more specific. She was an "army brat"

[RunningDeer]

Posted by Sammy (here)
I was able to watch the whole video. I liked the person I watched and listened to. I hope she gets back to this again where she would be able to share about what she went through and what she has learned from her recent adventure.

When I consider her "state hopping" I was thinking military... is she military? Or, is she married to someone in the military?

I do have to add one thing... knowing west Texas like I do, I think she was trying to convince herself not to miss (too much) the beach... but honestly, anyone would miss it compared to something like Odessa, for example... trust me there.

Teresa explains that her father was in the military, so the four kids and Mom and Dad moved a lot. The video of her on the beach was last fall, right around the time of her divorce. She never stated if her husband was in the military.

From other videos, she's shared more information. Like a divorce, moving east to west, then a recent move northward with a new partner who is a father of a young child (4 yrs.?). Teresa turned 30 last month which for some is a milestone. These are a lot of changes in a short amount of time. Perhaps to a military brat (as she calls herself) maybe it's not. Teresa stated that it was hard to establish long term friendships outside her family because they moved so often. It's not a stretch for her to feel connected to the Corey posse when there's not much else to compare it with.


It'd be helpful if Teresa got some land-legs. Ground, reflect and give herself time to discover where she looks to get her juice. Inside or outside?

[sunwings]

Corey Goode recently tweeted (last week) telling people to check out a new youtube video.

Please meet Sabrina and Sterling AKA Corey´s New kids On The Block.



AKA Blue Avian Pups



Discussing the Eclipse of Disclosure conference featuring

COREY GOODE JAY WEIDNER DR. MICHAEL SALLA LAURA EISENHOWER BENTINHO MASSARO
GERALD O'DONNELL NIARA ISLEY JIMMY CHURCH CLIFFORD MAHOOTY JUSTIN DESCHAMPS JORDAN SATHER
ERIC RAINES MIKE WASKOSKY VIVIAN DAVIS ROGER R. RICHARDS TERESA YANAROS

No need to go into detail about the names in bold.

A fun, modern and catchy video targeted towards the teenage / young adult market.

Their other videos attack the dark journalist and Bill Ryan and strongly push people like Justin, Teresa and Corey as being TOTALLY AMAZING!

They heavily promote the blue avian story and it is clearly scripted as they read off queue cards.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=UHxQK37JUT8

[Foxie Loxie]

Mike....you had me laughing out loud with your "admission"! (Sorry, Bill!) But it IS true that these poor kids are making their mistakes right out in public! I can totally relate, in a way, as I was completely naive & gullible for most of my life within the religious cult-type atmosphere....blindly believing that what I had been taught as a child was The Truth. Each one is going through his or her own personal journey & will have to make their own mistakes & then live with them...as have I & many of us I suspect!

[Joe from the Carolinas]

I stayed up real late listening.... finally got around to filming a response.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Bue5fdnXZMw

[Foxie Loxie]

"Profits for Prophets".....that is goooood! The tale of the ages...just a New Face on the Old Game! Keep 'em comin', Will...er Joe!

[Joe from the Carolinas]

Posted by Foxie Loxie (here)
"Profits for Prophets".....that is goooood! The tale of the ages...just a New Face on the Old Game! Keep 'em comin', Will...er Joe!

Thanks Foxie, all I know is what I read in the papers

[Mike]

Well done Joe. Yep, journalistic integrity is officially out the door.

Yanaros didn't say anything particularly galling in her Church interview. In fact she said quite a few things I agree with. Justin Deschamps said some stuff I liked too.

That's not what troubles me.

What troubles me is that the attention she is now enjoying came off the back of a phony narrative. Therefore it is manipulative. Nothing "spiritual" about that.

I believe Justin Dechamps is on record as saying he doesn't really care if Corey's story is true or not anymore. I'll bet Yanaros feels the same. Of course they don't care. The blue avian story has "launched" them and it is no longer necessary.

Notice how we keep getting further and further from the "blue avians"? There will come a point where these folks never mention them at all. The new narrative will become "that isnt the point anymore, what really matters is x,y and z.." Classic misdirection. And then they will accuse *you* of missing the point. Classic table turning.

The blue avians were only ever meant as a launching pad. They created a phony scenario and played off of it to launch careers and dilute the true ufo community. In this way, it can be said that it was a *false flag event*.

They only ever wanted to create a *culture*. An excuse was needed to do this. Enter the blue avians. This was never about truth. This was never about disclosure. It was about creating/ resurrecting the "new age". That's why they get so touchy about things like evidence, logic, and rationality. It spoils the fun. It ruins the "good vibes".

I worked at a Christian church not too long ago doing landscaping. Sunday was more of an event than a holy service. It was like a fashion show. The guys dressed in Hawaiian shirts and the girls were practically dressed for the beach. Loud, obnoxious music blared from their "sanctuary". None of it had anything to do with Jesus. It was only about creating a *culture *. It was an excuse to come together to show off new clothes and cars and talk about the latest in this or that. But mostly it's all a ruse to *make money*. You should see this place. It's like a palace. Wealthy people make giant donations there. Jesus' story wasn't the main theme there, it was just an excuse to make all this happen.

Same playbook with the blue avians and all it's various tentacles.

Jimmy Church says he wants "unity". To him, unity = agreement. What he doesn't tell you is that he wants "unity" and agreement...*but only under the banner of CG and Gaia and all these naive young people like Yanaros and Sather and Deschamps etc.* If he really wanted unity he'd have people on his show like Bill or Jesse or Walter or Randy Maugans or DJ. But the truth is, he's only interested in promoting one narrative (even as he pathetically reiterates his objectivity)

So what we have now is the nutters interviewing the nutters. It's incestuous. And it just hammers home the narrative they're trying to create, to the exclusion of virtually everything and everyone else. These people are becoming the new gate keepers. It's an attempt to *control all the information that does and doesnt get into the conversation*. Very dangerous.

Nothing more than back scratching journalism. But it goes beyond Church. Beyond Corey. Beyond Gaia. Beyong Wilcock and Peterson. Theyre mere pawns. Someone or something is pulling the strings behind the stage. Maybe I'm being dramatic there, but that's my feeling

[Harley]

Posted by Mike (here)
What troubles me is that the attention she is now enjoying came off the back of a phony narrative. Therefore it is manipulative. Nothing "spiritual" about that.

I believe Justin Dechamps is on record as saying he doesn't really care if Corey's story is true or not anymore. I'll bet Yanaros feels the same. Of course they don't care. The blue avian story has "launched" them and it is no longer necessary.

Perfect timing Mike! Now take a listen to this latest vid she just posted today (Only 10 minutes).

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=-kQeFs03r34

Yep, I see a young up-and-coming 'Personality' who realizes that she needs to be careful not to burn too many bridges if she's going to be successful!

[Mike]

Hey Harley she's pretty good actually. She almost inspired me!

The new meme with these folks is "disclosure is a state of mind". That's what I keep hearing.

They say it's an "open" state of mind. A receptive state of mind. Translation: an agreeable state of mind.

An ex girlfriend of mine would ask me something frequently, and that was this: "are you willing to open your mind to a new perspective?" She said this constantly by the way.

But it didn't take me long to figure out that what she really meant by this was "are you willing to open your mind to *agree with MY perspective?*"

After a while I realized that I was the only one doing the mind opening LOL. She was very uncomfortable with being challenged in any way. She had a habit of labelling a mere disagreement an "attack".

I'm not writing this post to pick on said ex girlfriend, but I can't help but see the parallels here with Yanaros and co. Truthfully her video wasn't bad at all. Again, she said some things I liked! And I admire her passion. But it all feels like a slow hypnotism to me. You agree and you agree and you agree...and then youre soft and pliable, and the next thing you know you're wearing one of those silly ass blue avian t-shirts and fetching Corey's coffee.

[WalterBosley]

Yes, I edited this. Before, it was too much not what I intended. And I don't want to start nitpicking everything about everyone in their camp. I think we all get it. Basically, the ultra-caffeinated, over-bleached pinging-off-the-walls version seems obviously less genuine as that more calm version of her we saw in the other video, and I think that says something about what's going on there.

I think the assessment that we'll see the product morph and shift as they go is spot-on.

Our job now is to go about our business, support those researchers we respect and talk about their work instead of these guys.

[Harley]

Agreed Walter.

As I said, she's being "careful not to burn too many bridges" and in the process hoping to suck even more people in.

She's perfect for Corey and I'm sure he has a big smile!

[WalterBosley]

I changed my assessment of Teresa's vid because I decided it was too curmudgeonly. It now says this:

"...And I don't want to start nitpicking everything about everyone in their camp. I think we all get it. Basically, the ultra-caffeinated, over-bleached pinging-off-the-walls version seems obviously less genuine than that more calm version of her we saw in the other video, and I think that says something about what's going on there.

I think the assessment that we'll see the product morph and shift as they go is spot-on.

Our job now is to go about our business, support those researchers we respect and talk about their work instead of these guys."

I say we keep a wary out for any unscrupulous shenanigans on their part, meme-stealing, data-mining, etc etc, but for the most part we should start giving more exposure in our commentary to the legit researchers, like Dolan, Farrell, Fitts, Brandenburg, Schratt, McCandlish, LaViolette, etc etc etc. This allows us to back up our dissatisfaction with an alternative for those paying attention.

[norman]

Posted by WalterBosley (here)
I changed my assessment of Teresa's vid because I decided it was too curmudgeonly. It now says this:

"...And I don't want to start nitpicking everything about everyone in their camp. I think we all get it. Basically, the ultra-caffeinated, over-bleached pinging-off-the-walls version seems obviously less genuine than that more calm version of her we saw in the other video, and I think that says something about what's going on there.

I think the assessment that we'll see the product morph and shift as they go is spot-on.

Our job now is to go about our business, support those researchers we respect and talk about their work instead of these guys."

I say we keep a wary out for any unscrupulous shenanigans on their part, meme-stealing, data-mining, etc etc, but for the most part we should start giving more exposure in our commentary to the legit researchers, like Dolan, Farrell, Fitts, Brandenburg, Schratt, McCandlish, LaViolette, etc etc etc. This allows us to back up our dissatisfaction with an alternative for those paying attention.

A good piece of advice but you left your own name out of the list. That's sloppy.