The Qanon posts, and associated US political analysis

[KiwiElf]

Have They Lied To Us About Absolutely EVERYTHING?? -- Bart Sibrel

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=bP6hDD8-FFI

85,866 views
SGTreport
Published on Feb 18, 2018
Bart Sibrel, the producer and director of 'A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon' joins me to discuss the NASA Apollo moon missions and SpaceX. Bart firmly believes that NASA faked the moon landings and the evidence cited in this interview leads me to draw many of the the same conclusions. We know that the elite who run the world have lied to us about everything else, so what would make you believe they told us the truth about the Apollo missions when by NASA's own admission, they have "lost" the technology to go back?

Related Links at YouTube Page, including 'A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon' (below)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJfbTvE4

[turiya]

Qanon Post #77

The Story of Obama's Ransom Payment to Iran Gets Worse

America paid Iran $1.7 billion in cash—funds that by law were not to be released unless and until Iran paid what it owed to American victims of its terrorism.

President Barack Obama announces on January 17, 2016 the release of American hostages held by Iran. ISP POOL IMAGES/Corbis/VCG via Getty Images.

Observation
Rick Richman
Nov. 1 2016

On the morning of January 17, 2016, President Obama declared that this was “a good day, because, once again, we’re seeing what’s possible with strong American diplomacy.”

The Iran nuclear deal had been implemented the day before—an example, the President said, of his “smart, patient, and disciplined approach to the world.” Now Iran was releasing five American hostages, the result of the administration’s “tireless” efforts. “On the sidelines of the nuclear negotiations,” the president explained, “our diplomats at the highest level, including Secretary [of State John] Kerry, used every meeting to push Iran to release our Americans.” In return for that gesture, the president continued, he was making a “reciprocal humanitarian gesture”: namely, clemency for seven Iranians imprisoned or awaiting trial for criminal violations of American sanctions. Later it was announced that the U.S. had also dropped outstanding warrants against another fourteen Iranians.

The president then added something else: with the nuclear deal implemented, and the hostages released, “the time was right” for “resolving a financial dispute that dated back more than three decades.” That dispute involved an Iranian claim regarding money advanced by the government of the Shah for military equipment that Washington did not deliver after the 1979 revolution. Now, the president asserted, we were returning Iran’s “own funds,” including “appropriate interest,” but “much less than the amount Iran sought.” The savings, he said, came potentially to “billions”—a figure quantified by his press secretary as “up to $6 billion or $7 billion” in a “very good deal for taxpayers.” In other words, now that the larger issues had been resolved, the U.S. was simply issuing a long-delayed refund to Iran, and in the process saving Americans a significant amount of money.

The president’s statement, however, omitted a great deal of relevant information. The president was returning $400 million in Iran’s “Foreign Military Sales” (FMS) account with the Pentagon, plus $1.3 billion in interest, but he failed to mention that in 1981, when Iran filed its claim before the Claims Tribunal at The Hague, the U.S. had responded with a counterclaim for $817 million for Iran’s violations of its obligations under the FMS program. In 2016, with both the claim and the counterclaim still pending, it was possible that Iran owed billions of dollars to the U.S., not the reverse.

Nor did the president mention the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act, signed by President Bill Clinton in 2000 and stipulating that Iran’s FMS account could not be refunded until court judgments held by the U.S. government against Iran for damages from terrorist acts against American citizens were resolved to America’s satisfaction. Those judgments, including interest accumulated between 2001 and 2016, totaled about $1 billion. The president did not explain how, under the 2000 law, with those judgments still outstanding, he could pay Iran anything at all.

Nor did the president mention that his “refund” to Iran was being paid in untraceable European cash, a fact discovered by reporters seven months later. He would then contend that, in light of the sanctions on banking transactions with Iran, “we had to give them cash.” But the sanction regulations expressly authorize bank payments to settle Iran’s claims at The Hague, as Michael Mukasey, the former U.S. attorney general, later testified to Congress, adding that there was “no legitimate reason why [Iran] should want cash other than to pursue terrorism.” Indeed, the Hizballah International Financing Prevention Act, passed by Congress in December 2015, had resulted in Tehran’s needing significantly more cash to continue funding its terrorist organization in Lebanon, Syria, and elsewhere.

In a February 3 letter, Ed Royce, the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, asked the administration to provide the legal basis for paying Iran’s claim, as well as a specific computation of the interest paid. He repeated the request in a June 1 letter, adding that according to information provided to him by the Congressional Research Service, the Hague tribunal paid 10-percent simple interest on such claims. Computed at that rate, and before considering the U.S. counterclaim under the FMS and the terror judgments still outstanding, Iran’s total claim on the FMS account was virtually identical to the $1.7 billion the administration paid, with no “billions” in savings.

To date, the administration has released no legal analysis to support its payment, no evaluation of the U.S. counterclaim, no text of the settlement agreement, no computation of the interest, no credible explanation for issuing the payment in cash, and no document showing the approval of the attorney general as required for issuing such a payment. For months, the administration hid important facts—including how the settlement was paid—even in response to direct congressional inquiries.

The $1.7-billion payment thus appears to have been a ransom, just as an Iranian general claimed it was at the time—a huge cash payment to accompany the lopsided exchange of 21 Iranians, duly charged or convicted under American law, for five American hostages who had been seized by Iran and held on fabricated charges in secret proceedings.

As for the outstanding claims against Tehran for the terror judgments, the administration has asserted that these were satisfied “by securing a favorable resolution on the interest owed to Iran.” What favorable resolution? In effect, the settlement cost the United States $2.7 billion—the $1.7 billion in cash plus about $1 billion in forgiven court judgments—to pay a claim that was not yet due, may not in fact have been owed, and may have been more than offset by the U.S. counterclaim that exceeded Iran’s own claim.

And therein lies the most troubling aspect of President Obama’s settlement, which is neither its amount nor its appearance as ransom but the fact that Iran succeeded in having U.S. taxpayers bear the cost of the damages owed by Iran for committing despicable acts of terrorism against them. To understand the magnitude of what the President did on January 17, some background is necessary.

In April 1995, Alisa Flatow, a twenty-year-old Brandeis University honors student spending her junior year abroad in Israel, boarded a bus in Jerusalem bound for a popular resort area in Gaza. It was the height of the “peace process,” celebrated the year before with Nobel Peace prizes. As the bus entered Gaza, a van filled with explosives slammed into it. Eight people, including Alisa, were killed, and more than 40 others were injured. The attack was carried out by a faction of Islamic Jihad controlled, financed, and directed by the highest levels of Iran’s government.

Alisa’s father, Stephen M. Flatow, filed suit in U.S. federal court against Iran, pursuant to legislation Congress had enacted permitting such suits against state sponsors of terrorist attacks on American citizens. A federal district court issued a 35-page opinion, Flatow v. Islamic Republic of Iran (1998), awarding a total of $20 million in compensatory damages as well as punitive damages, with both types of damages specifically authorized by the U.S. Congress. The court noted that expert testimony had “detailed an annual expenditure [by Iran] of approximately $75 million for terrorist activities” and that Iran “is so brazen in its sponsorship of terrorist activities that it carries a line item in its national budget for this purpose.” Accordingly, the court awarded punitive damages of $225 million—three times Iran’s publicly-disclosed annual terrorist budget. It was the minimum amount the expert had testified was necessary to have a significant deterrent effect, which was what Congress had intended to achieve in its authorizing legislation.

Over the next four years, a series of cases held Iran liable for similarly horrific terror operations. Cicippio v. Islamic Republic of Iran (1998) involved Joseph Cicippio (comptroller of the American University of Beirut), David Jacobsen (CEO of the medical center there), and Frank Reed (who operated two private schools in Beirut)—all abducted by Hizballah, an entity the court found was “sponsored, financed, and controlled by Iran.” Jacobsen had been chained and blindfolded for eighteen months; Reed had been held blindfolded or in darkness for more than three-and-a-half years; Cicippio had been held for over five years, chained in scorpion-infested cells and randomly beaten throughout his captivity. The court awarded them a total of $65 million in compensatory damages.

Anderson v. Islamic Republic of Iran (2000) involved Terry Anderson, chief Middle East correspondent for the Associated Press, who was kidnapped in Beirut by Hizballah and held shackled in filthy conditions for nearly seven years, fed only bread and water. The court again found Iran responsible, and awarded $41.2 million in compensatory damages and $300 million in punitive damages.

Eisenfeld v. Islamic Republic of Iran (2000) was brought by Leonard Eisenfeld for the death of his son Matthew, a twenty-five-year-old Yale graduate studying at the Jewish Theological Seminary in Israel, and by Arline Duker for the death of her twenty-year-old daughter, Sara, a Barnard College graduate enrolled in a program at the Hebrew University. They had been on an Israeli bus, en route to visit the archeological site at Petra, Jordan, when a passenger—acting under directions from a Hamas official funded and trained by Iran—detonated a bomb that destroyed the bus and killed them and others. The court awarded $22.5 million in compensatory damages and $300 million in punitive damages.

In still other cases, Iran was held legally responsible for the kidnapping, torture, and death of CIA station chief William Buckley in Beirut; the kidnapping of Father Lawrence Jenco, the director of Catholic Relief Services in Beirut, held for 564 days in conditions described by the court as “little better than [for] a caged animal”; the kidnapping of Thomas M. Sutherland, the dean of Agricultural and Food Sciences at the American University of Beirut, tortured for more than six years; the murder of Petty Officer Raymond Wagner in the 1983 car bombing of the American embassy in Beirut; the murder of Petty Officer Robert Stethem, beaten during the hijacking of TWA Flight 847, his body dumped on the tarmac, and the holding of nine other American hostages on that flight; and many other hostage-takings, with one court noting that Tehran “virtually directed the terms and conditions under which hostages would be held or released.”

In all, sixteen cases were decided against Iran by courts in the United States between 1998 and 2004, with awards of compensatory damages totaling some $400 million and punitive damages totaling $3.5 billion.

Of course, the problem faced by each victorious plaintiff was collecting the judgment. Stephen Flatow, after unsuccessfully seeking to have the damages paid out of various Iranian assets held in the United States, learned of the $400 million in the FMS fund. The Clinton administration had supported the legislation that allowed suits such as Flatow’s, but then strenuously opposed any effort to have the judgments satisfied from that fund. In its 1999 brief in federal court, the administration stated that the U.S. had a $817-million counterclaim against Iran, that the “current cash balance in Iran’s FMS program account [was] about $400 million,” and that “It is unknown how much, if any, of that amount will be owed to Iran by the United States until the claims before the [Hague] Tribunal are resolved” (emphasis added).

The court rejected Flatow’s contention that the FMS funds were the property of Iran, which could satisfy his judgment, on the grounds that “the United States does not share [his] characterization of these U.S. Treasury funds as ‘Iranian property.’” The court held instead that the FMS fund was U.S. property.

With Flatow’s subsequent appeal pending, Congress and the Clinton administration agreed on legislation directing the U.S. Treasury to pay the American holders of terror judgments against Iran for the amount of their compensatory damages plus 10 percent of their punitive damages, up to the amount in the FMS fund. The law subrogated the United States—meaning that the terror judgments became direct U.S. government claims against Iran to the extent the Treasury had paid them. Finally, the law included a provision to ensure that Iran would ultimately have to bear the cost of those payments: “no funds shall be paid to Iran . . . from the [FMS] fund until such subrogated claims have been dealt with to the satisfaction of the United States.”

Sixteen years later, with the $400 million still held by the U.S. government, and with no payments by Iran of a single cent of any of the sixteen court judgments against it, President Obama nevertheless gave the $400 million in the FMS account to Iran, plus interest. His statement that he was merely refunding Iran’s “own funds” directly contradicts the court’s determination in 1999. Indeed, since he made no mention of “resolving” the unpaid terror judgments in his January 17 statement, it is reasonable to conclude that the president simply ignored the 2000 statute as well.

January 17, 2016, was thus very far from “a good day . . . [for] strong American diplomacy.” It was a day of extraordinary diplomatic deception, practiced not against Iran—which knew exactly what the administration was doing—but against the American people, who were intentionally kept in the dark by the administration about critical aspects of the deal. President Obama paid Iran $1.7 billion that may not have been owed; paid it in cash—the currency of international terror; did not tell the American people he had relieved Iran from longstanding court judgments; did not add the cost of those judgments to the $1.7 billion payment that he announced; and did not faithfully execute the 2000 law—all the while congratulating himself on his accomplishment and claiming he had saved the U.S. billions.

The president’s actions with respect to the lawsuits won by American victims of Iranian terror, after years of litigation, stand in stark contrast to the resolution of the court cases concerning Libya’s terrorism, including the 1988 Pan Am 103 bombing over Lockerbie, Scotland. In 2008, Libya sought to re-establish relations with the United States, but Congress and the State Department blocked action until Libya satisfied the terror claims of American citizens against it. Libya agreed to pay and did pay the U.S. $1.5 billion to resolve those claims. Nothing of the sort accompanied the seemingly endless negotiations with Iran over the nuclear deal, as the administration made concession after concession to obtain it.

January 17, 2016 was in fact a shameful day in the history of American diplomacy. The only question is which aspect was most shameful: the craven abandonment of American claims against the Islamic Republic of Iran for past terrorism, the provision of a huge amount of cash enabling it to engage in future terrorism, the systematic mendacity about the process and the willful failure to inform the American people of everything that had been done, or the underlying policy of appeasing Iran that precipitated both the process and its cover-up.

What happened on January 17, 2016 was much worse than paying ransom.
Source

[Noelle]

Some more connections related to "Liddle." This was tweeted a few moments ago by James Taylor🇺🇸‏@James_Taylor78.

[Bluegreen]

"This 'Liddle' of 'Liddle Kidz' may be the name (or variation) the cabal has been using for DECADES."



Alice ("In Wonderland") Liddell as photographed by Lewis Carroll

[Cidersomerset]

Dec 2013 Victoria Nuland we invested $ 5 billion dollars to overthrow the elected
government of Ukraine

When U.S. Hacks Elections And Overthrows Governments It’s Okay

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=sizXVrfCGqg

Published on 19 Feb 2018..Info Wars..
Gerald Celente discusses the United States' shady dealings around the world.

================================================

Have They Lied To Us About Absolutely EVERYTHING?? -- Bart Sibrel

I posted this vid on here yesterday as it came up after the Corbett vid,
and I did a little piece about how I see everything is connected. Then
I thought maybe I was going off topic and deleted it and posted it on
the Stanley Kubric thread where it fits. It just made me smile you
posted it and I'm glad you did.....

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1209049

==================================================

The mainstream , intel and politicians still claim all the fraud is Russia's
fault even though there is a very long history of voting fraud just watch
the movie Lincoln. Even Fox are happy to blame Russia if Trump is not
involved than look at all the other reasons....

Putin: No proof Moscow interfered in election
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n31begB-soM
Published on 20 Feb 2018
Griff Jenkins has the details from Washington, D.C.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Hannity: Trump fires back at biased media, Democrats

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=MPnZ_NGUEQ4

Published on 19 Feb 2018
The media missed all the key facts and findings of Mueller's indictment
of 13 Russian nationals and three Russian companies.

==============================================

DOJ to probe potential Obama-era surveillance abuses

https://www.youtube.com/user/FoxBusinessNetwork/videos
Published on 19 Feb 2018..Fox.
Mueller indictment creates new legal questions for Hillary Clinton, DNC,
Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele; reaction from Fox News national security
strategist Sebastian Gorka and Fox News contributor Byron York on 'Hannity.'

==============================================

MUELLER INDICTED RUSSIANS FOR FACEBOOK ADS THAT HAD ZERO IMPACT ON
TRUMP WINNING ELECTION
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rBeR2nN7N0
Published on 19 Feb 2018..H A Goodman

[KiwiElf]

Cross-posting this from the "Alliance Insider: There Will Be No Civilian Trials for the Illuminati" thread as it is also relevant here (with the addition of quotes being addressed in this post, as they raise important concerns):

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...38#post1209038

Posted by pyrangello (here)
Didn't Q talk about gitmo and Panama prisons being prepped for more swamp creatures. Connecting the dots there are now drips of stories coming out how military is expanding at gitmo and more national guard are being called up to serve there. I think this is all a well thought out methodical plan step by step and one drip at a time. The Arthur posts seem to run parallel to Q . Time will tell but the more I see people resign from high positions the more I believe the temperature is rising around them.

Yes.

MegaAnon/"Q" has not [yet] used the term "Illuminati", "Cabal" or "Alliance", but According to MegAnon/"Q", 1,000 plus additional soldiers have been assigned to Gitmo and are preparing to receive over 1,000 "elite" prisoners. Even with the upgrades & expansion, that won't contain the estimated 13,000+ prisoners, contrary to "Arthur's" information. "Q" has confirmed a second prison (location presently unknown) is being prepped for this.

The air traffic to Gitmo, mostly chartered private jets, has more than tripled since January, and at least one United Airlines Boeing 757 flight recently.

On a side note, and as per one of the four articles referenced in this thread at the OP, prisoners deemed a "threat to national security" lose all their rights to a civilian hearing (and remember, many of these people are NOT civilians; we're talking those who are employed by govt agencies, FBI, CIA, NSA, politicians, military (over 300 high-ranking Navy officers are under investigation for a start), etc = military tribunals, particularly considering the serious nature of these crimes, eg Charges of High Treason, Sedition, Child Trafficking & Abuse, Pedophile Rings run by Govt & Law Operatives, Murder, Racketeering, Bribery, Aiding & Abetting the Enemy, Perjury & Fraud to name the more serious offenses, some of which can carry a possible death sentence.

Posted by Praxis (here)

I think military tribunals will set a bad precedent.

Do you not believe in the rule of law?
Do you not believe in the constitution?

Well like it or not, but all people have the right to trial by jury.

Just setting this right, and I want you to really consider what Rights mean to you, aside to appease your need for revenge will haunt you and all humans for centuries to come.

Yes we should have trials for people like Kissenger, Bush, Cheney, Obama, Clinton, North, Feith, Perl, and the list is to long to actually go through here. But they should happen in civilian courts because that is what makes us better than the Soviets or Chinese or insert which ever empire you choose.

Before we act, let us not become the evil we deplore.

Once you prove JFK, 9-11, OKC, pick your horror, convicting these people in civilian courts will not be a problem.

This is why Trump should have demanded the CIA release all documents, which as of now he still has not and we are waiting for more. This is why proving 9-11 with another investigation is important. A real investigation. Where is it?

Future proves past is just another way of saying the Ends justifies the means. Do you not see what is being done here?

Military Tribunals are Perfectly Constitutional. ... In other words, the men and women serving in military forces are not entitled to the benefits of trial in civilian courts, nor are civilians serving in the militia when they have been called into service.

Due to their crimes, including those who ARE "civilians", they can be prosecuted under Military Tribunals as Domestic Terrorists, Enemy Combatants & Enemies of the State.

They knew this when they "signed up" OR committed the above crimes; - they just didn't expect to be caught.

http://www.crf-usa.org/america-respo...tribunals.html

Posted by onawah (here)
Perhaps military tribunals are being considered because the courts are simply too corrupt.
Or perhaps the only way through is to keep it as little of a circus as the media would like to make it into.
I don't know if military tribunals are better equipped to do that than the courts, but it would be a good subject to research, at least.
I doubt that the military has been particularly fair or just in the past, but in this case, they might at least be less compromised...

As onawah has quite correctly surmised (above), the Court/Law/Justice System in the US is so corrupt atm under the previous administrations, ie (some D.A.'s police, lawyers & judges etc) currently having civilian trials would be a pointless exercise. (Mega Anon/"Q" mentioned a figure of 75% of the govt & congress are compromised). Many are part of the swamp/deep state and implicated themselves. There's also the sheer number involved; 13,300+ sealed indictments and growing. Keep in mind, a single indictment can be one or more persons/entities, and one or more persons/entities can be charged with several different indictments.

Civilian courts are not equipped to handle the nature of these arrests, or this volume, and even if they could, trial proceedings would drag out for years with dangerous implications. When the time comes, these "people" need to be dealt with swiftly to minimise further threats to the population.

(As three high profile examples, Obama is [allegedly] currently up on at least 18 charges including breaches of the Logan Act, & Hillary 27 charges, Adam Schiff up on at least one. I'm sure most readers can accurately guess the rest).

ALLIANCE INSIDER: “There Will be No Civilian Trials for the Illuminati”
http://dauntlessdialogue.com/allianc...he-illuminati/

Arthur: I don’t know if you’ve ever seen Military Tribunal Law, but because of the national security act, there will be no civilian trials for anybody who is a threat to national security.

Most of this information was leaked by an "Anonymous FBI insider" in July 2016, long before Mega Anon or "Q Anon".

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...-US-Government

Think of this as the 21st Century equivalent of the Nuremberg Trials x 600. It is literally the biggest political and governmental scandal (crime???) of all time and it's not limited to the USA. It's going Global.

Keep watching.

[Cidersomerset]

This could be to do with part of 'Q's Syrian post.....The guest is accusing Putin
Mercenaries of doing everything US mercenaries do false flags etc. This could
be true as they soon learn from each other or it could be more intel false info ??

Russian FM warns US not to ‘play with fire’ in Syrian conflict

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=sZ-fwfbZKIo

Published on 19 Feb 2018
Lt. Col. Ralph Peters discusses Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov’s
warning to the Trump administration, not to “play with fire” in regards
to the conflict in Syria.

===================================================
Syria is still a mess....

Assad to get involved in conflict between Kurds, Turkey - reports

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=im-0hnR8vuM

Published on 20 Feb 2018..RT
With Turkey trying to oust the Kurds from northern Syrian region, both sides
appear to be looking to strike an unlikely alliance. Damascus is reportedly in talks
to assist the Kurds while Turkey said it would welcome any effort by the Syrian
army, to drive out what it calls terrorists from Afrin.

==================================================

Syria is a powder keg with multi separate conflicts going on.....

Who is doing what in Syria and why?

USA, Russia, Saudi, Arabia, Qatar, Kurds, Turkey, Iran, Hezbollah, Israel

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Zws5G0mXyYg

Published 20/2/18..GLOBAL DEFENCE

It seems that every time a chapter in the war on Syria comes to an end, a new
factor surfaces. Just like the 1975-1989 civil war in Lebanon before it, and which
started off with a clash between the PLO and the Lebanese rightwing Phalangist
militia and then ended up with an Israeli invasion and its aftermath, the war on
Syria is now a totally different war from the one that started seven years ago.


===================================================
===================================================

Edit..added.



Syria war: Pro-government forces enter Kurdish-held Afrin

Syrian pro-government forces have entered the Kurdish enclave of Afrin,
provoking an immediate response from Turkish forces besieging the area

read more..


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-43131600

[KiwiElf]

Posted by turiya (here)
Jerome Corsi retweets Avgerinos Thanassis....

Avgerinos Thanassis‏
@AvgerinosMoscow

Retweeted Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom): https://fb.me/8XCeC7IQk



5:03 PM - 18 Feb 2018

To the hard-working Anons on 8CHAN: (if you're watching...)

Now THIS is an excellent & professional example of a Meme that "Normies" can relate to. Drop the bad language, bad spelling & skip ANY of the prejudice & bias. You're only turning your target audience off. This is what a top ad agency would do. THIS is what "Q" expects.

[turiya]

Posted by Cidersomerset (here)
This could be to do with part of 'Q's Syrian post.....The guest is accusing Putin
Mercenaries of doing everything US mercenaries do false flags etc. This could
be true as they soon learn from each other or it could be more intel false info ??

Russian FM warns US not to ‘play with fire’ in Syrian conflict

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=sZ-fwfbZKIo

Published on 19 Feb 2018
Lt. Col. Ralph Peters discusses Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov’s
warning to the Trump administration, not to “play with fire” in regards
to the conflict in Syria.

===================================================
Syria is still a mess....

Assad to get involved in conflict between Kurds, Turkey - reports

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=im-0hnR8vuM

Published on 20 Feb 2018..RT
With Turkey trying to oust the Kurds from northern Syrian region, both sides
appear to be looking to strike an unlikely alliance. Damascus is reportedly in talks
to assist the Kurds while Turkey said it would welcome any effort by the Syrian
army, to drive out what it calls terrorists from Afrin.

Dave of X22Report puts this into a better context... Certainly, Trump would have the responsibility for making a properly worded announcement regarding the developing situation in the M.E. region...

In short, there is no way that Erdogan is going to go against Russia, as Russia is backing Syria. Fox is still capable of promoting Deep State 'Fake News'...

The Next Move Will Have To Be Soon,
This Is Why - Episode 1502b
(Feb 19, 2018)


VIDEO

https://youtu.be/oofBKqVOnOE?t=4m39s

___________

Kurdish Fighters Strike Deal With Syrian Army To Drive Turks Out

• Feb 19, 2018 8:09 AM

• Confirming that the “enemy of my enemy is my friend”, YPG Kurdish fighters in north-western Syria – who as a reminder are backed by the US, the country which for 7 years has waged a proxy war to overthrow president Bashar al Assad – have struck a deal with the Russia-backed Assad regime for Syrian forces to enter the Afrin region and repel a Turkish offensive which began last month.

• Badran Jia Kurd, an advisor to the Kurdish-led administration in northern Syria told Reuters that Syrian troops will deploy along several border positions and could enter the region within the next two days: “we can cooperate with any side that lends us a helping hand in light of the barbaric crimes and the international silence,” Jia Kurd said.

Source: zerohedge.com

___________

.Trump thanks ‘Fox & Friends’ for timeline of Obama administration’s ‘failures’ on Russia

By Max Greenwood - 02/20/18 07:52 AM EST

President Trump in an early morning tweet on Tuesday thanked "Fox & Friends" for outlining the Obama administration's "failures" in addressing Russian aggressions in Crimea and elsewhere.

"Thank you to @foxandfriends for the great timeline on all of the failures the Obama Administration had against Russia, including Crimea, Syria and so much more," Trump wrote on Twitter. "We are now starting to win again!"

.

Thank you to @foxandfriends for the great timeline on all of the failures the Obama Administration had against Russia, including Crimea, Syria and so much more. We are now starting to win again!

4:24 AM - 20 Feb 2018

The "Fox & Friends" segment Trump referred to centered on the Obama administration's unsuccessful efforts to thaw relations with Russia and its failure to thwart aggressive actions by Moscow.

The Hill

[Flash]

Posted by turiya (here)

Dave of X22Report puts this into a better context... Certainly, Trump would have the responsibility for making a properly worded announcement regarding the developing situation in the M.E. region...

The Next Move Will Have To Be Soon,
This Is Why - Episode 1502b
(Feb 19, 2018)


VIDEO

https://youtu.be/oofBKqVOnOE?t=4m39s

___________

Kurdish Fighters Strike Deal With Syrian Army To Drive Turks Out

• Feb 19, 2018 8:09 AM

• Confirming that the “enemy of my enemy is my friend”, YPG Kurdish fighters in north-western Syria – who as a reminder are backed by the US, the country which for 7 years has waged a proxy war to overthrow president Bashar al Assad – have struck a deal with the Russia-backed Assad regime for Syrian forces to enter the Afrin region and repel a Turkish offensive which began last month.

• Badran Jia Kurd, an advisor to the Kurdish-led administration in northern Syria told Reuters that Syrian troops will deploy along several border positions and could enter the region within the next two days: “we can cooperate with any side that lends us a helping hand in light of the barbaric crimes and the international silence,” Jia Kurd said.

Source: zerohedge.com

___________

.Trump thanks ‘Fox & Friends’ for timeline of Obama administration’s ‘failures’ on Russia

By Max Greenwood - 02/20/18 07:52 AM EST

President Trump in an early morning tweet on Tuesday thanked "Fox & Friends" for outlining the Obama administration's "failures" in addressing Russian aggressions in Crimea and elsewhere.

"Thank you to @foxandfriends for the great timeline on all of the failures the Obama Administration had against Russia, including Crimea, Syria and so much more," Trump wrote on Twitter. "We are now starting to win again!"

.

Thank you to @foxandfriends for the great timeline on all of the failures the Obama Administration had against Russia, including Crimea, Syria and so much more. We are now starting to win again!

4:24 AM - 20 Feb 2018

The "Fox & Friends" segment Trump referred to centered on the Obama administration's unsuccessful efforts to thaw relations with Russia and its failure to thwart aggressive actions by Moscow.

The Hill

There was no Russian agression in Crimea. Crimean are Russians to start with (not Ukrainians) in majority, they were starving under the Ukrainian flag and wanted to change back to the mother nation. And America did not respect this demand through a population referendum. I am so fed up by this wrong rhetoric of the USA governement. I do not think Russia is clear and good, but I think that even Trump here is wanting to pump American patriotism and twart the DNC by using Russia as well. No better than DNC in my views.

Why not just say the dam truth to start with?

This tells me you are still being had, Amereican, by whomever party/president lust for powere.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by LadyM (here)
Some more connections related to "Liddle." This was tweeted a few moments ago by James Taylor🇺🇸‏@James_Taylor78.

Posted by Bluegreen (here)
"This 'Liddle' of 'Liddle Kidz' may be the name (or variation) the cabal has been using for DECADES."



Alice ("In Wonderland") Liddell as photographed by Lewis Carroll

It's true indeed that Lewis Carroll's legacy has somewhat lurid undertones, and it always been widely speculated that he was obsessed with the young Alice Liddell, and the girl he used most frequently as a child model. That's a red flag straight away. Some of the photographs he took of her may not have been entirely innocent, or have involved much clothing. There was also an episode, as described by Carroll's biographer, Morton Cohen, that a serious breakdown occurred in the relationship between Carroll and Liddell's parents at one point. There was a story that Carroll wanted to marry Liddell - aged only 11 at the time.

I've heard of many references in Alice in Wonderland that relate directly to Liddell, although Carroll always denied that she was the inspiration for the character. First, he dedicated the books to Alice Liddle, second the date for Alice's adventure is Alice Liddell's birthday, and the first letter of each line in a poem featuring in Through the Looking Glass, spells out Alice Liddell. When you think about it, taking all this into consideration, the very title "Alice in Wonderland" takes on a sinister new meaning.

With these new revelations, I also wonder if there's any connection to the supermarket chain Lidl [[I'm not saying there is, just wondering]] - which is really, really big in Europe (not sure if they're in the US). It's been associated with a string of controversies over the years. Most recently, they were accused of airbrushing out the Christian cross from images of churches in various promotional materials. Religious neutrality or some such excuse. The company has also been linked to organized crime in Italy.

[turiya]

Posted by Flash (here)

Posted by turiya (here)

Edit: Dave of X22Report puts this into a better context... Certainly, Trump would have the responsibility for making a properly worded announcement regarding the developing situation in the M.E. region...

In short, there is no way that Erdogan is going to go against Russia, as Russia is backing Syria. Fox is still capable of promoting Deep State 'Fake News'...

The Next Move Will Have To Be Soon,
This Is Why - Episode 1502b
(Feb 19, 2018)


VIDEO

https://youtu.be/oofBKqVOnOE?t=4m39s

___________

Kurdish Fighters Strike Deal With Syrian Army To Drive Turks Out

• Feb 19, 2018 8:09 AM

• Confirming that the “enemy of my enemy is my friend”, YPG Kurdish fighters in north-western Syria – who as a reminder are backed by the US, the country which for 7 years has waged a proxy war to overthrow president Bashar al Assad – have struck a deal with the Russia-backed Assad regime for Syrian forces to enter the Afrin region and repel a Turkish offensive which began last month.

• Badran Jia Kurd, an advisor to the Kurdish-led administration in northern Syria told Reuters that Syrian troops will deploy along several border positions and could enter the region within the next two days: “we can cooperate with any side that lends us a helping hand in light of the barbaric crimes and the international silence,” Jia Kurd said.

Source: zerohedge.com

There was no Russian agression in Crimea. Crimean are Russians to start with (not Ukrainians) in majority, they were starving under the Ukrainian flag and wanted to change back to the mother nation. And America did not respect this demand through a population referendum. I am so fed up by this wrong rhetoric of the USA governement. I do not think Russia is clear and good, but I think that even Trump here is wanting to pump American patriotism and twart the DNC by using Russia as well. No better than DNC in my views.

Why not just say the dam truth to start with?

This tells me you are still being had, Amereican, by whomever party/president lust for powere.

Perhaps, you missed my edit, Flash... that Fox News is still capable of promoting Deep State propaganda, i.e. "Fake News"

I think its pertinent to understand that Trump has been in power just over one year. In that regard, those that think that Trump is 100% in control of the government doesn't understand how deep that Deep State rabbithole goes, especially following the attempt that was in place to overthrow the U.S. Democratic Republic, as is pointed out in Jerome Corsi's recent article:

Treason: QAnon Exposes Obama/Hillary 16-year Coup d’état Plan

Report: QAnon describes plan to destroy America, reshape world
Jerome Corsi | Infowars.com
January 22, 2018

[KiwiElf]

Here's a graphic to go with that, Turiya

The 16-Year Plan to Destroy America (click to enlarge)

[edina]

I want to share this here, for anyone who may want to follow through.

Anonymous 02/18/18 (Sun) 17:50:43 eddf5e No.422667>>422680 >>422716 >>422727

>>422626

we are wising up boss

alexandria file -

https:// me ga.nz/#F!kn5lQJ5I

decryption key - !gIr0SGs4SL2fXrQR0dU61A

started appearing a couple nights ago.

Remember the Anon rule on sharing links.

I'm looking at the file right now,

It's a bit of a mother-lode.

May be an understatement.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by edina (here)
I want to share this here, for anyone who may want to follow through.

It's a multi-gigabyte archive named "Alexandria.zip" containing hundreds of documents, at the URL https://mega.nz/#F!kn5lQJ5I on wide variety of "conspiracy" topics.

I have it downloading in another window ... though I don't know how many minutes/hours/days it will take to complete the download, or even if it will.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by edina (here)
Remember the Anon rule on sharing links.

What is the Anon rule on sharing links?

[Michelle Marie]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by edina (here)
I want to share this here, for anyone who may want to follow through.

It's a multi-gigabyte archive named "Alexandria.zip" containing hundreds of documents, at the URL https://mega.nz/#F!kn5lQJ5I on wide variety of "conspiracy" topics.

I have it downloading in another window ... though I don't know how many minutes/hours/days it will take to complete the download, or even if it will.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by edina (here)
Remember the Anon rule on sharing links.

What is the Anon rule on sharing links?

They break the links so you can't click on them and access them directly. That's what I saw on 4chan and 8chan.

Anyone else remember that one?

MM

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Michelle Marie (here)

Posted by Paul (here)
What is the Anon rule on sharing links?

They break the links so you can't click on them and access them directly. That's what I saw on 4chan and 8chan.

That sounds likely to me. Since I saw that the link that edina posted was deliberately made unclickable, I guessed that was the recommended procedure, and made my copy of that link unclickable too.

[edina]

Posted by Paul (here)
It's a multi-gigabyte archive named "Alexandria.zip" containing hundreds of documents, at the URL https://mega.nz/#F!kn5lQJ5I on wide variety of "conspiracy" topics.

I'm thinking, sometimes it pays to be nosey. LOL

So much information is locked behind paywalls, or high costs.

The value of the text books in this folder must run into the thousands.

Thank you to the Anon who shared the link and to the Anon who uploaded Alexandria.

Posted by edina (here)
decryption key - !gIr0SGs4SL2fXrQR0dU61A

[ThePythonicCow]

As best as I can tell, this Alexandria.zip file that's on mega.nz is about 9 GBytes in size. I got about half of it downloaded, and then was told that I had exceeded my free limit for the day, and would need to either wait, or spend a few dollars. I have not decided what I will do next .

[Michelle Marie]

Posted by Paul (here)
As best as I can tell, this Alexandria.zip file that's on mega.nz is about 9 GBytes in size. I got about half of it downloaded, and then was told that I had exceeded my free limit for the day, and would need to either wait, or spend a few dollars. I have not decided what I will do next .

It was too big for me to download on my iPad, so I skipped it. I don't think I'll download it on my laptop, either, since I'm running out of space on that. It's a pretty big file! It must be rich. $$$$

MM