The Qanon posts, and associated US political analysis

[Ba-ba-Ra]

regarding Rod Rosenstein - bad guy or bad guy flipped.

I always thought it was highly suspicious that RR went on a trip abroad (6/11/18) just as the release of the inspector general report was nearing, and when pressure was growing for the Justice Department to approve Joe Pientka—the FBI agent who interviewed Michael Flynn—to appear before the Senate judiciary committee.

The trip was rather hush hush and we were only told that he was currently representing the United States abroad in a “brief and unrelated visit.” The Justice Dept representative did not say which country, but did say it’s “one of America’s key intelligence partners.”

Hmm, so why was RR visiting one of the 5 eyes at that key time? . . . and why so little information released around it?

[mojo]

Cant wait until we get to see the real unredacted version. Today it was really fun opening my Dads eyes to the Q material. He already knew much already about the corrupt politics but nothing on Q and it was neat to hear the surprises in his voice from the breadcrumbs Q provided us...

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=xqTZ6d59a7Y

[KiwiElf]

Hahhhh,.... you just beat me to the above Praying Medic Video, Mojo. Many thanks. (It's a long one - Q anon focuses on the declassified FISA application used to spy on President Trump).

[A Voice from the Mountains]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by A Voice from the Mountains (here)
I've been convinced that it's legit for months, but I mean for those who are still doubting it, it seems like it'd be difficult to explain why Q posted that picture before Avenatti did (if I am reading the time stamps right: 3:00 vs. 3:55?), and Q posted a fuller version too.

I doubt that it was Avenatti who took that picture; rather someone working for him.

So the picture would have gone "over the air", in its fuller form, from the worker's phone to Avenatti's phone, prior to Avenatti trimming and tweating it. The NSA or such could have picked off the picture in its fuller form, off that first transfer.

Yes, but that's not what I'm saying, Paul. I know Avenatti didn't take the picture.

What I'm saying is, where did Avenatti get the picture he tweeted and how could those who are still skeptical of Q explain how Q had the fuller image? And unless the time stamps are off because of time zones, Q posted the fuller image before Avenatti posted it to Twitter.

A lot of people are still skeptical about Q so I think about this from multiple angles, how different people are seeing all of these things happening, and I think what just happened between Q and Avenatti should be a pretty big redpill for many who are still on the fence.


In other words, let's saying I'm a skeptic of Q. Avenatti just posted a picture from near his office of a guy he's looking for. Where did he get that picture? From Q? Then how did Q get the photo? If I believed that Q is a LARP then I wouldn't be able to accept that he had the capable of hacking the phone of one of Avenatti's goons. And if Q took the picture himself, driving around near Avenatti's office, and then Avenatti just cropped it, why was Q taking a picture of somebody that Avenatti then also expressed an interest in himself, rather than the guy who took the photo? Because, as you suggested, the guy who took the picture was the goon, not Q.

So unless I'm missing something here, what Avenatti tweeted has only helped to confirm (ie for those who are still looking at all of this skeptically) that Q is not a LARP, and very likely has access to a sophisticated intelligence apparatus. There's another group of Q skeptics who believe that Q really is an intelligence agent of some kind but just don't trust what they view as Trump propaganda coming out of it. So I'm just keeping tabs on the wider debate on this whole phenomenon when I talk about Avenatti's tweet.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by A Voice from the Mountains (here)
What I'm saying is, where did Avenatti get the picture he tweeted and how could those who are still skeptical of Q explain how Q had the fuller image? And unless the time stamps are off because of time zones, Q posted the fuller image before Avenatti posted it to Twitter.

My current speculative scenario, which I believe answers your questions:

1. Trump intelligence agent in black takes pictures of Avenatti's office building.
2. As agent in black walks away, an Avenatti goon takes mirror reversed picture of agent in black.
3. Avenatti goon sends full picture to Avenatti.
4. NSA captures full picture, "over the air", as it is being sent from goon to Avenatti.
5. NSA sends full picture to Q.
6. Q posts full picture.
7. Avenatti tweats a trimmed down version of picture.

[norman]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by A Voice from the Mountains (here)
What I'm saying is, where did Avenatti get the picture he tweeted and how could those who are still skeptical of Q explain how Q had the fuller image? And unless the time stamps are off because of time zones, Q posted the fuller image before Avenatti posted it to Twitter.

My current speculative scenario, which I believe answers your questions:

1. Trump intelligence agent in black takes pictures of Avenatti's office building.
2. As agent in black walks away, an Avenatti goon takes mirror reversed picture of agent in black.
3. Avenatti goon sends full picture to Avenatti.
4. NSA captures full picture, "over the air", as it is being sent from goon to Avenatti.
5. NSA sends full picture to Q.
6. Q posts full picture.
7. Avenatti tweats a trimmed down version of picture.

hah . . and just imagine how freaked that made Goon and Avenatti

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by norman (here)
hah . . and just imagine how freaked that made Goon and Avenatti

Indeed ... I should have added one more step:

8. Avenatti freaks out.

[KiwiElf]

"Q" is busy - Latest "Q" posts, #1776 - 1787, click to enlarge or go directly to link below (last post #1787 is very interesting...)

https://qanon.pub/
--------------------------------------------
1787
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 5d8652 No.2385771 📁
Aug 1 2018 00:55:23 (EST)
Please remove all posts across all boards re: last 2.
Reddit, Twitter, FB, etc will ban and remove.
Sensitive.
Error made.
Article influenced drop.
Improper sequence.
Q
--------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#1776 - 1779


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#1780 - 1783


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#1784 - 1787


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is "Q's" last post referring to the two which preceded it, ie #1785 - 1786?

Here are the text versions:
------------------------------------------------------
1785
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 3754e3 No.2385397 📁
Aug 1 2018 00:30:14 (EST)
C7B241E7-2FAA-4DC7-AF1B-42F4E0116978.jpeg


⬇
https://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...eers/📁
These people are EVIL & SICK!
Coincidence?
Q
------------------------------------------------------
1786
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 3754e3 No.2385533 📁
Aug 1 2018 00:39:26 (EST)

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 3754e3 No.2385397 📁
Aug 1 2018 00:30:14 (EST)
C7B241E7-2FAA-4DC7-AF1B-42F4E0116978.jpeg


⬇
https://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...eers/📁
These people are EVIL & SICK!
Coincidence?
Q

>>2385397
Haiti.
Q
------------------------------------------------------

And here's the Breitbart article referred to (additional links & info at original link below):

https://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...00-volunteers/


Democrats’ Impeachment Army: $110 Million, 1000 Staff, 2000 Volunteers

Tom Steyer impeachment (Spencer Platt / Getty - see image at link))
Spencer Platt / Getty
31 Jul 20184585

Democrats who are pushing for the impeachment of President Donald Trump will have $110 million to spend on the cause, thanks to the efforts of left-wing billionaire Tom Steyer.

Steyer’s organizations, NextGen America and Need to Impeach, will also have a combined 1,000 employees and 2,000 staffers as they take the case for impeachment to voters in November, according to Politico. Though House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has discouraged impeachment talk, grass roots Democrats favor the idea.

Politico reports:

Tom Steyer plans to spend at least $110 million in 2018, making the billionaire investor the largest single source of campaign cash on the left and placing him on a path to create a parallel party infrastructure with polling, analytics and staffing capabilities that stand to shape and define the issues the party runs on in November.

Steyer is building out an operation that’s bigger than anyone’s other than the Koch brothers’ — and the billionaire and his aides believe the reservoir of nontraditional voters he’s already activated could become the overriding factor in House and other races across the country.

…

Between the two organizations, he’ll have close to 1,000 people on staff, in addition to over 2,000 volunteers. The Need to Impeach email list alone has already topped 5.5 million, which its research — anyone who signs up with the effort has their information run through a series of voter files and other databases — shows includes a very exact 697,780 infrequent voters in the 63 most competitive House districts.

“Our list is bigger than the NRA’s — and we’re going to make sure that it votes that way in 2018,” said Kevin Mack, lead strategist for Need to Impeach.

Steyer claimed earlier this year that Democrats must embrace impeachment if they want to win the midterm elections and return to power. Politico adds that Steyer’s internal polls show that Republican voters are not yet motivated by the desire to prevent Trump from being impeached — which has been a major fear of the Democratic Party establishment, which has tried to suppress the idea.

Steyer, who has already spent tens of millions of dollars on pro-impeachment advertising, will hope for a better return on his investments than he experienced in 2014, when he spent roughly $75 million, only to see Republicans take the Senate.

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. He is also the co-author of How Trump Won: The Inside Story of a Revolution, which is available from Regnery. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.

I think this guy has more money than brains - or perhaps hanging out with Mad Maxine too much.

Obvious question: Impeach Trump for what, exactly?????

Better question: what's Tom Steyer so scared of ... or hiding??

[mojo]

going mainstream is good!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=SKd93vlCpj8

[Michelle Marie]

Posted by KiwiElf (here)
Hahhhh,.... you just beat me to the above Praying Medic Video, Mojo. Many thanks. (It's a long one - Q anon focuses on the declassified FISA application used to spy on President Trump).

This was a well-done, well-presented, document reflecting sound research using official documentation for education. The timing is great! Just when more people are turning toward Q research. This will attract intelligent people who may have been duped in the past by dismissing credible information as "conspiracy theories" or "psyops" or a "LARP".

As more people get the truth in this way, the great awakening will create miracles -- positive changes for all of humanity.


MM

[pueblo]

You can almost smell the fear in this MSNBC clumsy attempt at a hit piece...

Dark to Light!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=yFOniQF3aI8

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Not sure what he's saying, may be 'Thank you'.



Awesome

[KiwiElf]

Latest "Q" posts #1781 - 1792 - NOTE: these are revised drops, the last three from yesterday (what were previously #1785 - 1787), have been deleted - was it really an accident or a warning to Tom Steyer? This is addressed. (See previous drops @ post 5948, above). "Q" again references how many are on the "Q" Team @ #1789 with the implication that POTUS is one of the "Q" team, or at least "knows" - there are "less than 10".

Click to enlarge or go directly to link below

https://qanon.pub/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#1781 - 1784



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revised #1785 - 1788



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#1789 - 1792



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Valerie Villars]

There are nine pages of Q t-shirts on Amazon, which tells me they are selling like hotcakes.

Have you had your "Q" today?

[turiya]

And, the beat goes on... Qanon movement rising....

53) We've been waiting for someone to ask a direct question to the President about #Qanon. It would settle the debate about whether Q is working with Trump.

We got close today when the @PressSec was asked a Q-related question but she dodged the topic.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Qvi_MGhe8GM

1:23 PM - 1 Aug 2018

52) Axios obeyed orders, filing this report on the wacky #Qanon conspiracy.



1:23 PM - 1 Aug 2018

1781

Do you think they got the [4am] memo?
Coincidence?
All for a Conspiracy?
Enjoy the show.
Q

46) What are the odds that all these news outlets would randomly publish nearly identical articles about #Qanon within 24 hours?



12:30 PM - 1 Aug 2018

[Sample 3]

• https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/....e2fa376890db/
• https://www.theguardian.com/technolo...plained-trump/
• https://www.fastcompany.com/90212200...-trumps-rally/
• https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifes...=.48a0d2b54d5/
• https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...-qanon-705425/
• https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...t-shirts.html/
• https://thinkprogress.org/trump-tamp...-68037c87f50b/
• https://www.newsweek.com/what-qanon-...rally-1051708/
• https://splinternews.com/trumps-tamp...ri-1828015269/
• https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...us-conspiracy/
• https://www.today.com/video/youtube-...1289814083720/
• https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/...s-ath-vpx.cnn/
• https://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbcs-h...on-bath-salts/

[KiwiElf]

LMAO - would be hilarious if Sarah is one of the "Q" team... (Sarah's reference to "common sense" - see latest "Q" posts #1787 )

Of course the fakestream media know all about it... (not)! Ahhhhh I need more ... LOTS MORE!

[turiya]

Posted by KiwiElf (here)
LMAO - would be hilarious if Sarah is one of the "Q" team... (Sarah's reference to "common sense" - see latest "Q" posts #1787 )

Of course the fakestream media know all about it... (not)! Ahhhhh I need more ... LOTS MORE!

Well, she is in the picture, doing some work at one of the oars...

[mountain_jim]

Well I am currently viewing the twitter feed in the Q drop 1792 above and it is heart-warming and hilarious!

NBC is getting buried by posts from the We-are-Q continuum and the art, images, messaging against the MSM, testimony, etc. all in one place is impressive.

https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1024747172829556741

[Ba-ba-Ra]

I listen to PrayingMedic's video in post #5949 - thanks Mojo and KiwiElf - and hope and want to believe it's true as to what is happening in the Mueller Investigation


Here's another take (which I hope isn't true, but makes sense as well.)

Larry Nichols reminds us that Manafort was brought up on these same charges in the past - and at that time RR dismissed them.

Also brings out that what Mueller's investigation is doing, is keeping people from taking a position in Trumps Admin because they don't want to have to run the risk of being put on jail on false charges.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=hZDfLjfqZlI

[mojo]

Start at 15:00 minute mark, Q even posted about it. Juan Williams the model of hypocrisy... Calling Q a fringe group without any understanding is really pointing a finger on how bad of a reporter he is, no research equals ignorance.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=wlOFNUIE3mE