The Qanon posts, and associated US political analysis

**Michelle Marie** · 5th September 2018 19:23

Posted by onawah (here)
Brett Kavanaugh Hearings: Takeaways From Day 1
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/04/u...g-updates.html
Democrats acting out and bringing up a good point about delay on documents re Kavanaugh, but more hysteria about Trump's legal status and they neglect to mention his history of rewarding polluters and lack of regard for the environment.
"The moment Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing opened, Democrats and protesters turned it into a verbal brawl. Senator Kamala Harris, Democrat of California, immediately interrupted the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Charles E. Grassley, demanding a delay to consider tens of thousands of pages of documents released Monday — the night before the hearing and a holiday.

Other Democrats backed her, especially the senators considering a run for the White House in 2020, as did women’s rights protesters, several of whom were arrested and thrown out as they decried the sessions as a sham.

“We cannot possibly move forward, Mr. Chairman, with this hearing,” one of the presidential aspirants, Senator Harris, declared.

Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut called the hearing “a charade and a mockery.”

“What are we trying to hide? Why are we rushing?” asked Senator Patrick J. Leahy, Democrat of Vermont.

Posted by Michelle Marie (here)

Posted by mojo (here)
What a fiasco going on in the Kavanaugh hearing, but one person really shined out for their speech. He laid out everything nice and clear... Great job Senator Cruz!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=6yNmyekIxH0

Yeah!!! Really great job.

This kind of firm talk laying it on the line will save our country...and the world.

MM

Paid protesters at that...

Kavanaugh -- Paid Protesters
https://needtoknow.news/2018/09/texa...paid-off-cash/
(See video)

Texas doctors who were at the Kavanaugh inauguration said they saw protesters get paid off before the hearing.
FULL ARTICLE
https://www.infowars.com/texas-docto...efore-hearing/

MM

**turiya** · 5th September 2018 19:30

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)

Posted by turiya (here)
...
As I have stated previously, the separation between those that having been receiving the "fireside chats" from Q & those that are depending on the corporate MSM news outlets to get their "reality check" is growing ever more deeper & ever more wider - making it near improbable that the twain is ever going to be able to meet.

And as Kiwi has pointed out, there a number of alternative sites that take the side of the uninformed & spew out whatever nonsense it is, place it into the food trough, for those that want to feed off of whatever it is they put there. Enjoy the junk food, if that is what you like to eat.

I am not going to make any attempt to bridge that gap for you. That is entirely up to you.

I used the words of "q", not mainstream media.

I triple-dog-dare you to actually address the particular issues that I brought up, rather than attempting a deflecting avalanche of words.

"q", just like the deep state and the presidents that follow their orders, have called for "regime change" in Iran, just like the israeli zionists have. Address that one issue.

First of all, I'm not at all, as you say, "attempting a deflecting avalanche of words." I'm not so manipulative as you obviously would like to portray me as. As far as I was concerned, I had addressed your issues with Trump... edit: Not willing to accept suggest a closed mind. A closed mind is not the best position to take. That's all there is to this... if it doesn't go along with what has been already decided, then it must be an manipulative attempt to throw an avalanche of words... that's just a bunch of BS from where I sit.

Saudi Arabia Arms deal - It was an Obama administration era agreement. Trump used it to keep the Deep State / MSM propaganda arm off-balance & guessing. The funding of the supposed 'Saudi arms deal' is still in the hands of Congress.

As for Iran...

Quite frankly, I didn't exactly know which Q post you were referring to. So, I looked it up myself - posted below...

I attempted to address this (not deflect) in my Post #6654 with the article from Jim Quinn over at The Burning Platform will post it again below. Within that article, it is stated what happened in 1953 w/ the CIA involvment in the overthrow of the Iranian government under Premier Mohammed Mosaddeq & with the installment of the Shah as puppet of the Deep State. The article is headlined below...

Certainly one can take the notion of 'Regime change' as to be that which is done from outside the country of Iran. But that is not the only meaning that can be attached to the the two-word phrase. Regime change can also be done within - by 'We the People' of Iran. As you can see & read the complete post for yourself & take in the entire context of the post.

Also, it should be noted:It has also been observed - from the very beginning - that Q is very, very precise with the words that are used in the posted board messages.

Free Iran!!!
Fight
Fight
Fight
Regime change.
People have the power.
We stand with you.
Q.

As you can see from the context of the entire post, Q is stating support for the people to make the change for themselves. I really don't see the problem. I can only see the problem that you have when you are 'attempting' to link Q with the Deep State apparatus - the same Deep State apparatus that is in control of the imams in Iran - the same Deep State apparatus that was on the receiving end of the plane loads of pallets & pallets & pallets of cash that Obama unlawfully (without Congressional oversight) shipped to Iran & to Syria.

This is the same Deep State apparatus that has Angela Merkel all stressed out & wanting the Iran Deal to keep that promised cash to continue to flow. The same Deep State apparatus that has John Kerry running around the world colluding with Iranian cabal officials.

I don't see the problem of Q or Trump supporting the takedown of the CIA/Deep State/cabal control (i.e. regime change) by the people of Iran.

If regime change to you means 'coming from the outside of Iran', then that is your choice. Its up to you. I won't interfere. Be my guest.

But, that's not the way I choose to interpret it. Try to enjoy the show... Have some POPCORN:

_______________________________

THIS DAY IN HISTORY
CIA-assisted coup overthrows
government of Iran – 1953
by

Author / Administrator
Posted on August 19, 2018

Via History.com

The Iranian military, with the support and financial assistance of the United States government, overthrows the government of Premier Mohammed Mosaddeq and reinstates the Shah of Iran. Iran remained a solid Cold War ally of the United States until a revolution ended the Shah’s rule in 1979.

Dr. Mossadeq entering court for his trial.

Mosaddeq came to prominence in Iran in 1951 when he was appointed premier. A fierce nationalist, Mosaddeq immediately began attacks on British oil companies operating in his country, calling for expropriation and nationalization of the oil fields. His actions brought him into conflict with the pro-Western elites of Iran and the Shah, Mohammed Reza Pahlevi. Indeed, the Shah dismissed Mossadeq in mid-1952, but massive public riots condemning the action forced the Shah to reinstate Mossadeq a short time later.

U.S. officials watched events in Iran with growing suspicion. British intelligence sources, working with the American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), came to the conclusion that Mossadeq had communist leanings and would move Iran into the Soviet orbit if allowed to stay in power. Working with Shah, the CIA and British intelligence began to engineer a plot to overthrow Mossadeq. The Iranian premier, however, got wind of the plan and called his supporters to take to the streets in protest. At this point, the Shah left the country for “medical reasons.” While British intelligence backed away from the debacle, the CIA continued its covert operations in Iran.

Working with pro-Shah forces and, most importantly, the Iranian military, the CIA cajoled, threatened, and bribed its way into influence and helped to organize another coup attempt against Mossadeq. On August 19, 1953, the military, backed by street protests organized and financed by the CIA, overthrew Mossadeq. The Shah quickly returned to take power and, as thanks for the American help, signed over 40 percent of Iran’s oil fields to U.S. companies.

Source: The Burning Platform

_______________________________

IRAN NEXT

Clowns = CIA

Late add: Regarding Trump's tweet about Assad....

President Bashar al-Assad of Syria must not recklessly attack Idlib Province. The Russians and Iranians would be making a grave humanitarian mistake to take part in this potential human tragedy. Hundreds of thousands of people could be killed. Don’t let that happen!

3:20 PM - 3 Sep 2018

TRANSCRIPTION STARTS @ 29m19s:
X22Report:

Now, let's think about this for a minute...
We know that in Idlib, they are planning a false flag. And we also know from previous posts, there was a 'magic sword' dropped from the other night. And there are clowns that are based in Syria. And, we know we're going to be hitting those targets.

And an anon put up the 'Damascene Sword Monument' in Umayyad Square, Damascus, Syria. And, Trump is out there - from his tweet - saying that 'we shouldn't be doing this at all. Hundreds of thousands of people are going to lose their lives.

And, we see already - this is what the Deep State normally does. If they don't want Russia or Syria to strike an area, they tell you 'its a humanitarian crisis, and this shouldn't be done'. And, they try to stop everyone.

And Trump's actually doing the opposite, because they're getting ready to prepare this area for a strike, because they are going to remove the Deep State.

Video Link

Syria blasts at Mezzeh military airport 'not Israeli strikes' -- BBC
2 September 2018

.

**edina** · 5th September 2018 19:36

Posted by onawah (here)
To both Paul and Dennis I say yes and yes. No one is omnipotent and can see the whole picture clearly. There is just too much going on. If I were to take an intuitive guess, I would say we are shifting from Kali Yuga where evil was predominant to whatever the next one is, where it's evenly balanced, because that's how the Trump transition feels to me. Still plenty of evil, but at least not as much as before, and yes, it's a huge transition, but let us not blind ourselves to the huge amount of evil that still surrounds us.
Just take a look at this for one:https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1246076
If Trump is doing anything about the vaccine massacre, I haven't heard about it.
And I'm just asking about the following--does anyone know if this is fake news or not?:

In my opinion this is a misrepresentation of the news. I thought you listened to video of Ted Cruz since you shared it earlier.

Listen again, and then see if you think this meme is fully accurate. It may be technically accurate but doesn't tell the whole truth. It's a half truth.
It leaves out important and relevant context that Ted Cruz fully describes in the video that mojo shared.

To address your question about Trump's position on vaccines. He's talked about that issue, even before he ever ran for President. He believes there is a link between vaccines and autism.
And a while back there was a raid on the CDC, it was during the time the Atlanta airport lost power. This was discussed among the Q autists at the time.

Everything cannot not happen at once. It does appear to me that this issue will eventually be addressed by the Trump administration.

First, ... as I've said before, clean up the embedded corrupt (bad) actors. So many things to do, but nothing happens if this is not done first.

**onawah** · 5th September 2018 19:44

Right, except Trump has appointed a whole lot of bad actors, and I don't think it's a good idea to pretend that all is well when our children are being murdered, maimed and ruined for life, and the planet is being poisoned to within an inch of Her life.
Here's another one: House GOP Seeks to Scuttle Playground Bans on Glyphosate
Local Limits on Spraying Monsanto’s Toxic Weed Killer in Parks, Playgrounds and Schoolyards Blocked by House Republican Farm Bill
https://www.ewg.org/release/house-go...3#.W5AygehKgdV
"FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 2018

WASHINGTON – More than 50 city and county ordinances banning the use of the toxic weed killer glyphosate on local playgrounds, parks and schoolyards could be overturned by a provision championed by House Republicans in their version of the farm bill, an EWG analysis found.

A four-page provision tucked away in the 748-page farm bill passed by the House of Representatives in June would likely preempt local governments from adopting their own pesticide regulations, including ordinances that prohibit the use of glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup, in parks and playgrounds.

EWG’s analysis of data from Beyond Pesticides found 58 local ordinances that ban the use of glyphosate. Overall, 155 local ordinances that regulate the use of toxic chemicals in parks and playgrounds could be preempted by Sec. 9101 of the House’s farm bill.

Glyphosate is classified by the state of California as a chemical known to cause cancer, and as a probable carcinogen by the World Health Organization. Earlier this month, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $289 million to a school groundskeeper who said years of working with Roundup caused his terminal cancer.

The analysis comes just weeks after tests commissioned by EWG found potentially unsafe levels of glyphosate residues in popular oat-based foods marketed toward children, including Cheerios.

Cities and counties that may no longer be able to ban glyphosate in places where children play include big cities like San Francisco and smaller communities like Evanston, Ill., among many other locations.

“Children are especially susceptible to the health impacts of toxic pesticides, so our communities should be able to decide whether our kids are rolling around in weed killers linked to cancer while playing at the park,” said Scott Faber, EWG’s senior vice president of government affairs. “Section 9101 of the House farm bill would block our communities from keeping our kids safe.”

“As independent science continues to shine light on the dangers pesticides pose to human health and the environment, local communities are responding by successfully eliminating these toxic products from regular use,” said Drew Toher, community resource and policy director at Beyond Pesticides. “Congress must continue to uphold the right of these localities to restrict pesticides linked to cancer, water contamination and pollinator decline.”

The section of the farm bill that could block cities and counties from adopting their own pesticide safety standards is opposed by the National League of Cities and the National Association of County Officials. Last week, 107 members of the House sent a letter to the farm bill conferees outlining their opposition to pesticide riders like Section 9101 and the “Poison Our Waters Provision,” which would eliminate Clean Water Act safeguards to protect communities from pesticides sprayed directly into water supplies.

Among the companies and industry groups registered to lobby Congress on pesticide provisions of the farm bill is Bayer, which now owns Monsanto, Dow and CropLife America.

“Parents and city leaders, not pesticide corporations, should decide whether their kids are playing in pesticides,” Faber said.

To see all communities with existing pesticide restrictions that could be preempted by the House farm bill, click here.
https://www.ewg.org/interactive-maps.../#.W5AxZuhKgdX "

Posted by edina (here)

First, ... as I've said before, clean up the embedded corrupt (bad) actors. So many things to do, but nothing happens if this is not done first.

**pyrangello** · 5th September 2018 20:12

Glyphosate in Food & Water https://detoxproject.org/glyphosate-in-food-water/ when you start doing some research on what this toxic crap is in what foods, its no wonder so many people are coming down with cancer. And why in the hell does this even need to be in our food??????

**Oddball** · 5th September 2018 20:12

No matter if you think Q is legitimate, or he is a LARP, isn't the takedown of global corruption and the banking cartels something that everyone can get behind?

And think about this also, Alex Jones, Dark Journalist, Jerome Corsi,and the many others who discredit Q have been making a living off of exposing global corruption among many other "conspiracies". Q has touched on just about everything that you can possibly read about on a "alternative news" forum. Everything from how the federal reserve was set up to the Uranium 1 deal.

So what happens if Trump and the "white hats" really do drain the swamp? What happens if the ultra rich banking families are taken out of power? What are people like Alex Jones going to report on? How are they going to make a living then? To me, this is the definite reason why they try so hard to discredit Q, not because he is a fake.

Remember Alex Jones had his own insider "Zack"? Not a single one of that guys predictions turned out to be true. None of his "inside information" has ever amounted to anything. Not a single prediction.

Personally, I started following Q a few weeks after he started posting. The more I tried to debunk him, the more I was convinced that this is a real operation.

I would recommend to anyone interested to do exactly what Q says, do your own research, form your own conclusions, be careful who you follow.

**edina** · 5th September 2018 20:23

Posted by onawah (here)
Right, except Trump has appointed a whole lot of bad actors, and I don't think it's a good idea to pretend that all is well when our children are being murdered, maimed and ruined for life, and the planet is being poisoned to within an inch of Her life.
Here's another one: House GOP Seeks to Scuttle Playground Bans on Glyphosate
Local Limits on Spraying Monsanto’s Toxic Weed Killer in Parks, Playgrounds and Schoolyards Blocked by House Republican Farm Bill
https://www.ewg.org/release/house-go...3#.W5AygehKgdV
"FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 2018

WASHINGTON – More than 50 city and county ordinances banning the use of the toxic weed killer glyphosate on local playgrounds, parks and schoolyards could be overturned by a provision championed by House Republicans in their version of the farm bill, an EWG analysis found.

A four-page provision tucked away in the 748-page farm bill passed by the House of Representatives in June would likely preempt local governments from adopting their own pesticide regulations, including ordinances that prohibit the use of glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup, in parks and playgrounds.

EWG’s analysis of data from Beyond Pesticides found 58 local ordinances that ban the use of glyphosate. Overall, 155 local ordinances that regulate the use of toxic chemicals in parks and playgrounds could be preempted by Sec. 9101 of the House’s farm bill.

Glyphosate is classified by the state of California as a chemical known to cause cancer, and as a probable carcinogen by the World Health Organization. Earlier this month, a San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $289 million to a school groundskeeper who said years of working with Roundup caused his terminal cancer.

The analysis comes just weeks after tests commissioned by EWG found potentially unsafe levels of glyphosate residues in popular oat-based foods marketed toward children, including Cheerios.

Cities and counties that may no longer be able to ban glyphosate in places where children play include big cities like San Francisco and smaller communities like Evanston, Ill., among many other locations.

“Children are especially susceptible to the health impacts of toxic pesticides, so our communities should be able to decide whether our kids are rolling around in weed killers linked to cancer while playing at the park,” said Scott Faber, EWG’s senior vice president of government affairs. “Section 9101 of the House farm bill would block our communities from keeping our kids safe.”

“As independent science continues to shine light on the dangers pesticides pose to human health and the environment, local communities are responding by successfully eliminating these toxic products from regular use,” said Drew Toher, community resource and policy director at Beyond Pesticides. “Congress must continue to uphold the right of these localities to restrict pesticides linked to cancer, water contamination and pollinator decline.”

The section of the farm bill that could block cities and counties from adopting their own pesticide safety standards is opposed by the National League of Cities and the National Association of County Officials. Last week, 107 members of the House sent a letter to the farm bill conferees outlining their opposition to pesticide riders like Section 9101 and the “Poison Our Waters Provision,” which would eliminate Clean Water Act safeguards to protect communities from pesticides sprayed directly into water supplies.

Among the companies and industry groups registered to lobby Congress on pesticide provisions of the farm bill is Bayer, which now owns Monsanto, Dow and CropLife America.

“Parents and city leaders, not pesticide corporations, should decide whether their kids are playing in pesticides,” Faber said.

To see all communities with existing pesticide restrictions that could be preempted by the House farm bill, click here.
https://www.ewg.org/interactive-maps.../#.W5AxZuhKgdX "

Posted by edina (here)

First, ... as I've said before, clean up the embedded corrupt (bad) actors. So many things to do, but nothing happens if this is not done first.

First, where do you get the idea that I'm pretending all is well?

Second, House GOP mentioned in your comment are the ones essentially owned by K-Street and are a part of the Deep State bad actors that need cleaning up.

Third, fight the municipal fights at the municipal level. Your local level. This is something you're very passionate about onawah. Trust your passion and fight the fights you feel called to fight in your heart. Everyone has to chose where to place their focus based on what is resonating with them. Because, we can't do everything at once. I've always believed that if everyone follows their heart, and takes action based on that then all the various bases will be covered.

Each of us do this in our own ways.

It's inaccurate to assume that because I am focused on the Q thread here in Avalon that I don't know about or take action on anything else.

You asked about Trump. I shared what I thought. You disagree with me. Okay.

Done.

No need to quibble.

**ThePythonicCow** · 5th September 2018 20:40

Posted by onawah (here)
And I'm just asking about the following--does anyone know if this is fake news or not?

Valarie Kaur might be correct in her tweat:

Don’t let this get buried. This is “the first time that a sitting president has asserted executive privilege under the Public Records Act in order to prevent documents from going to Congress during a Supreme Court confirmation process.”

If she is correct, that might be because this is the first time that the opposition to a Supreme Court nomination requested documents that were internal White House documents that should be protected by executive privilege under the Public Records Act.

Perhaps, furthermore, the opposition asked for these documents not because they were relevant to the legal views and work of Kavanaugh (they aren't relevant, as Ted Cruz explained), but because they reliably anticipated that their request would be denied, so that they could then make a stink of the request being denied (even as they received more documents from Kavanaugh's rich legal and judicial record than Congress received for the previous five Supreme Court nominees, combined).

Perhaps the opposition to Kavanaugh's nomination is not acting in good faith.

**edina** · 5th September 2018 20:49

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
I have not been paying attention to "q", but I heard someone mention that "q" gave it away that "q" is a deep state and mossad psyop, by "q" stating that Iran has to be taken out. Is this true?

A short answer to your above question. It’s not true.
If you want more explanation, I’ll respond.

And it’s evident that you have not been paying attention to q by the tone and content of your comments.
Thank you for stating the obvious.

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
Does "q" not know what retired general Wesley Clark told the public about the neocon (now the marriage of neocon+neoliberal) plan to wipe out "7 countries in 5 years?" Syria was on the psychopathic militarists' hit list. "w" bush did as he was told, then obomber did what he was told, and now trump is doing what he was told. What's the common denominator? Certainly "q" (and you, dear reader) cannot possibly believe that 3 US presidents in a row, republican, democrat, republican*, all happen to be accidentally following the exact same game plan that Wesley Clark told us about nearly 2 decades ago.

Another short direct answer to this question. Not only does the Q Team know about this, but they know much more than this. And the Q team is actively opposing this plan.

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
Evidently, the Tweeter-in-Chief just telegraphed that the "gassing his own people!" schtick has worn too thin, and now flat-out warns Syria not to fight the (US-backed) alQaeda/alNusra/mercenaries/terrorists, or else... hundreds of thousands will die. Do you understand the gravity of that threat? If you do, maybe a few more trump supporters will figure out that trump isn't the dragonslayer of the swamp, just another lizard in the swamp.

Attachment 38996

Okay, so this is not really a question. It’s more an accusation. And a back-handed attempt to insult people you think disagree with you.

But let’s pretend for a moment, it’s a genuine question with an honest attempt at conversation.

This is where Kiwi, turiya and Paul have tried to help you understand the context of what’s happening.
They have way more patience with the drama than I do. Kudos to them.

If you want to know what the Q-Team thinks, read the Q team posts.

Here are the relevant links.

https://qanon.app/?q=mossad

https://qanon.app/?q=israel

https://qanon.app/?q=regime

https://qanon.app/?q=iran

If you want to continue to cherry pick and conflate… go for it. Or, you could try to read to understand.
It’s up to you.

If I see more openness in your response I’ll do what I can to help you understand. If not, no worries. I’ll go back to ignoring you.

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
*(Yes, it could have been republican, democrat, democrat. Yes, it would have been equally as bad or worse with killary in the big chair, and yes, she would definitely have followed the same game plan, targeting Syria, and Iran. Get it now? It doesn't matter who gets to wear the crown, the president of the USA, INC. does not direct US foreign policy - they simply acquiesce to the real rulers behind the curtain, or they get a ride in a convertible and a new hairdo. trump is following orders.)

This rant (and others) is why I initially ignored you. You’re mind is made up. End of story.

And this explains why every other person’s attempt to have an honest conversation with you has been an utter waste of their time.

Good day, Dennis.

**mojo** · 5th September 2018 20:53

isn't the takedown of global corruption and the banking cartels something that everyone can get behind?

Hi Oddball,
Nice quote and the rest of your post is good too... Not so odd after all...

Sometimes attempts to derail a post are caused, it's just like Congress for example, not being able to work on immigration reform for the good of all America. Blinded by partisanship and unable to see anything even to the benefits of the constituents.

**Foxie Loxie** · 5th September 2018 20:56

"derail" is a good word, mojo!

**Oddball** · 5th September 2018 21:09

Not so odd after all...

Shhh.....don't tell anyone

and thank you.

Also, just to contribute to the thread, I found this article to be very interesting.

https://www.blacklistednews.com/arti...ctions-in.html

Facebook is gearing up for the upcoming midterm elections by building a physical “war room” in order to fight off “bad actors” who wish to influence voters.
Facebook’s head of civic engagement, Samidh Chakrabarti, told NBC in an interview published Tuesday that the company was in a better place than it was in 2016 in regards to fighting “misinformation” and “fake news.”

Sounds to me like a Tactical Operations Center military style. This level of seriousness makes me think they are scared. Also an interesting choice of words with the "bad actors".

According to the top executive, the social giant has become effective over the past two years in “combating foreign interference” and blocking and deleting unwanted “fake accounts.”

I think by fake accounts he means, "anyone who disagrees with what we tell them."

**mojo** · 5th September 2018 21:29

The Qanon site is down...hmmm lots of attacks even the new york times attacks now...

**edina** · 5th September 2018 21:38

Posted by mojo (here)
The Qanon site is down...hmmm lots of attacks even the new york times attacks now...

Uncanny timing

The patriots fight board is still up, https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#122

It's a good time to remember to download the most recent pdf to keep posts archived offline.

http://irc.qclearancearchive.net/02....%20-%20X.I.pdf

https://qanonposts.com/ still working

**Michelle Marie** · 5th September 2018 22:01

There are new posts on Patriots Fight.
https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#186

Documentation
* On April 30, 2015, a letter was sent to the Secretary of Treasury, Jacob Lew requesting all records relating to the sale of Uranium One to Rosatom (Russia) be sent no later than May 14, 2015. The letter was sent by Jeb Hensarling, Chairman of the Committee on Financial Services. The letter was copied to Maxine Waters.

https://vault.fbi.gov/uranium-one-tr...-01-of-01/view
--see pages 5 & 6

This is a link referenced in a Q post dropped today, September 5, 2018.
__________________________
Just above the question, "How do you obstruct financial oversight?"
This link is provided...
https://financialservices.house.gov/about/members.htm
Here we see the committee members of the Financial Services Committee.

Maxine Waters, ranking member
_________________________
(My addition)
Rep. Maxine Waters named one of the most Corrupt Members of Congress by CREW--Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.
https://www.citizensforethics.org/pr...r-of-congress/
She "violated House conflict of interest rules" in banking deal.
__________________________
Tucker: How did Maxine Waters afford $4.3 Million mansion?
Show clip: 1.44 minutes
https://video.foxnews.com/v/54936225...#sp=show-clips
_______________________
Q...
"Those who are the loudest
Have the most to FEAR (hide)."
_______________________
Then, there are more links to Hillary tweets putting down Kavanaugh.
Someone might be able to explain to me why she is so afraid of Kavanaugh, besides her guilt of evil-doing. Does this mean "her people" are not in place as "firewalls"?
______________________
Trump allies push him to declassify some Russian probe docs
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...-russia-808316

Today's article ... Reps. Meadows, Jordan, Gaetz, and Zeldan asking Trump to declassify additional portions of the application the FBI submitted to surveil Carter Page in late 2016.
_______________________
President Trump may declassify the 20 FISA docs that Congess wants.
https://saraacarter.com/president-tr...ongress-wants/
Some DOJ officials don't want Trump to declassify the docs.

The last two links that q posted today asks:

"Coincidence?'
Q
________________
This YouTube link was provided by Q today:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Tocc8EolxXg

Sen. Lindsay Graham questions Brett Kavanaugh at Confirmation Hearing for Supreme Court

From Q:

Interesting line of questions?
Normal?
Military Law vs. Criminal Law
Think EO.
Think HRC panic.
Do you believe in coincidences?
You have more than you know.
Q
__________________

MM

**edina** · 5th September 2018 22:10

I'm watching the video linked in the last Q post right now... evidently Lindsey Graham is asking questions about military law vs criminal law.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Tocc8EolxXg

Anyone else thinking of that little Huma/Lindsey Graham exchange?

**turiya** · 5th September 2018 22:12

Posted by edina (here)