Bill Ryan's personal Question-and-Answer thread. Pile it on. :)

[WhiteFeather]

What are your thoughts on whom actually created the human species. Re: Hominids and Alien DNA?

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by WhiteFeather (here)
What are your thoughts on whom actually created the human species. Re: Hominids and Alien DNA?

Well, not so much 'created', but maybe enhanced. I'm not a geneticist, and I don't know if this ever could be proven or substantiated. But it does seem to me to be plausible that if we're someone's science experiment (and we may well be), then there have been some inputs to the experimental subjects to see what happens — or, to accelerate progress towards a defined goal.

As I wrote in my post #137, here:

There are two kinds of scientific experiment (basically).

1. To attempt to achieve a desired result (e.g. making a new alloy or chemical compound with certain specific properties).
2. Just to see what happens if you do X, Y, or Z.

Regarding who may have done this? No idea. Even after all these years of contactee and abductee reports, I have no clarity at all on what races are out there, what their individual contact history has been with Planet Earth, or where they're from.

I speculate that there are many (Henry Deacon said 'over 40'; Clifford Stone said 57) — which seems very believable — and if I were told there were 1000, I'd not be surprised.

Their agendas, just like those of Europeans encountering indigenous races in recent colonial history, are likely to span the entire spectrum from altruistic to directly exploitative and uncaring/harmful.

There's absolutely NO reason to assume that those races with more technological prowess are also more spiritually and ethically advanced. On Planet Earth, simply among we humans, this is clearly NOT the case.

It sometimes staggers me that this isn't more obvious to more people, who insist in a naive, utopian way that ETs must surely be 'highly spiritually evolved'. (We technologically advanced 'westerners' absolutely aren't.)

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Iancorgi (here)
Sawadee Kraap Bill,

Which three questions would you like to be asked?

Thank you for your dedication. Keep up the great work.

Of everything I've been asked so far, that's the one post that's had me staring at the screen for longest. (Truly. No exaggeration.)

Of course, there are some things I'd be happy to talk about more, but I really don't feel I can just kick into my own self-reflexive Q-and-A. That's not really the point here... or else I'd just launch into some long personal presentation and not take any questions at all.

~~~

As a PS, though, I might say this: I was expecting a few questions about the moderation of the forum. Not mandatory! Whatsoever. But I was just a little surprised there haven't been one or two more.

[WhiteFeather]

In your opinion Bill, what would be some of your best alternative choices in treating cancer.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by WhiteFeather (here)
In your opinion Bill, what would be some of your best alternative choices in treating cancer.

What immediately comes to mind are any, or any combination, of

• Radionics
• Rife therapy
• Ozone therapy
• MMS
• Vitamin C megadose therapy
• Chelation therapy (to remove heavy metals: a support for just about anything)
• Coffee enemas (to detox: similarly supportive for any healing program)
• Water fasting
• Diet optimization to create an alkaline environment.

• Regression sessions may also be helpful to identify any past-life influence on one's current body condition. This can often be underestimated.

Not an exclusive list! There may be many effective protocols which I know little about.

[avatar]

Do you personally feel you have changed your timeline in this life? How easy/hard is it? What is your advice for doing this?

[Jad]

First off thanks Bill for creating this thread, and I hope it reaches more pages than the “Truth about CG” thread! Second I want to thank everyone for their amazing questions and I hope you guys come up with even more cause it’s a very interesting thread indeed!
I have some sort of a question/suggestion for you Bill: You mentioned that you are sitting tight on that story of yours that you described as the strangest thing you ever witnessed in your life. I am pretty sure that there are lots of folks other than me who are actually very interested in learning about this story. Have you ever considered making a novel about it? You can even publish it as fiction if you want, and get it out there in the Mass Consciousness. Wether people believe or not is not important cause either way it will expand their awareness to new concepts and ideas that they never thought of before. Afterall you do remind me in a way of Graham Hancock with your eloquence and clear mind and he too wrote some fiction novels and I am certain that you can create something special.

[Hazelfern]

It never occurred to me. Don't i feel like a POS.
Bill, if you will please tell of the challenge to host the greatest forum on the internet. I do love this place where many feel right at home.
If you will....

Had to add emojis for Foxie

[sunwings]

If I did a keyword search for "I don´t believe in coincidences" your posts would come up over and over again Bill.

Could you expand on your own experiences of life showing itself in this way?

[shaberon]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
The very beautiful people are deeply Buddhist, and it's JUST like being in Tibet, minus the Chinese takeover and widespread destruction of the Tibetan culture.

But I'm not a cultural historian to the degree that your question demands.

I didn't really put it very clearly. There isn't a question historically about symbolism, but by "proprietorship", I mean the difference between...post something about those two symbols, "Star of David" and swastika on the internet, and you know what's likely to happen...versus the speechless moment shared with the Ladakhi monk who had interiorized them the right way. Same symbols. In other words, we tend to make a huge confused chatter about things that never entered his mind, in a similar way to the C. I. A. being pleased that nothing Americans believe in is real. Both cases are like misunderstanding fragments instead of clearly seeing the whole thing.

I was impressed by that meeting. If the site seemed abandoned it's likely to have been sacred for some reason and he was acting as a guardian.

[Baby Steps]

Hi again

There have been some recent leavers from PA including the mighty Turya.

Did they leave because you said that the Q phenomenon was a bit cult-ish?

Was there a conspiracy to silence or de platform anybody?

Were you concerned that PA was becoming too much of a conservative or Q conspiracy site?

Many thanks

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by avatar (here)
Do you personally feel you have changed your timeline in this life? How easy/hard is it? What is your advice for doing this?

That's a pretty wonderful question, and twists and turns quite a long way down the rabbit hole.

Timeline shifts are VERY subtle, and can usually only be identified afterwards. Our lives are a little like sitting in the carriage of a train, able to see out the windows to the side (and maybe just a little bit ahead), but we're NOT in the driver's cab at the very front of the train, looking straight ahead and able to see clearly when the points are switching.

My favorite reference for this (and I think maybe the best possible one, even 20 years later) is the wonderful, unique, ingenious and funny 1998 film Sliding Doors, with Gwyneth Paltrow. For those who've never seen this, it's all about a split in the heroine's timeline, and all the events that then play out in the two parallel realities.

Following the timeline split, the movie also very cleverly splits in two, showing the two timelines diverging simultaneously: not with a split screen, but with alternating scenes, with Gwyneth Paltrow being given a makeover hairdo on one of the timelines so that the particular version of her reality we're looking at can be easily distinguished.

The VERY clever thing about this movie —and I've experienced EXACTLY this myself, 100% for sure — is how at the very end, the two divergent 'loops' kind of join together again, and everything is resolved. I can't recommend it too highly.

I really do believe this kind of thing happens maybe much more often that some are aware. As I said, in my own case, it definitely did in one complex and fascinating circumstance. My own 'loop' lasted 5 years. (And, of course, so did the loop for the other person involved. We even compared notes about it, and everything fitted perfectly together like two jigsaw pieces.) To tell the entire story would be the equivalent of storyboarding the entire Sliding Doors movie — which is actually two movies in one, of course. It's do-able, but it's beyond the scope of a post like this. (Or, any post!)

I've been a student of this phenomenon for years now, and I've listed in my journal half a dozen or so pivotal events in my life where I believe my timeline did indeed split. I do NOT think a new universe is generated for us at every microsecond of our existence, for instance depending on whether we have tea or coffee for breakfast, or what we decide to wear that day. Maybe there's a tiny divergent split at times like that, but the two parallel realities very soon come right back together again, seconds, minutes or hours later.

But MAJOR divergent splits, that keep on diverging, may occur at certain pivotal points, perhaps not too many. Those points are likely to be personal major Yes-No decisions we make when presented with clear major live choices: like

1. Whether to go with the potential of a certain new relationship, or to commit to a marriage.
2. Whether to go with the potential of a certain new job, career path, or educational opportunity.
3. Whether to go with the potential of living in another country.

There are obviously other potential variations on this (maybe like making the choice whether to commit a crime or not!), but in my case the above three are the prime ones. When searching back through one's own life looking for timeline splits, I'd suggest those three areas are the ones to examine closely.

Like a huge iceberg, the above summary is just a tiny, tiny, TINY tip of it.

Can one manage or control this deliberately? If there's a way, I have absolutely no idea how to do that. But as an interesting linked reference (which is definitely connected), do see my remarks about Dr Bruce Goldberg's hypnotic PROgression, in my post #138 here.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Jad (here)
First off thanks Bill for creating this thread, and I hope it reaches more pages than the “Truth about CG” thread! Second I want to thank everyone for their amazing questions and I hope you guys come up with even more cause it’s a very interesting thread indeed!
I have some sort of a question/suggestion for you Bill: You mentioned that you are sitting tight on that story of yours that you described as the strangest thing you ever witnessed in your life. I am pretty sure that there are lots of folks other than me who are actually very interested in learning about this story. Have you ever considered making a novel about it? You can even publish it as fiction if you want, and get it out there in the Mass Consciousness. Whether people believe or not is not important cause either way it will expand their awareness to new concepts and ideas that they never thought of before. After all you do remind me in a way of Graham Hancock with your eloquence and clear mind and he too wrote some fiction novels and I am certain that you can create something special.

Yes, I'd never thought of that.

But just as a rider, I do have to say that claimed-fact-packaged-as-fiction never sits very well with me. And I suspect, not with that many people.

One can read a novel, knowing that the author has stated right up front that this is all based on fact with a few names changed (an example is Sean David Morton's Sands of Time series). But even with that in mind, it's often STILL hard to figure out what's fact and what's fiction.

So it comes over as a form of disinformation — though of course there's no intention to deceive.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Hazelfern (here)
It never occurred to me. Don't i feel like a POS.
Bill, if you will please tell of the challenge to host the greatest forum on the internet. I do love this place where many feel right at home.
If you will....

Had to add emojis for Foxie

The challenges? Well, once the whole thing got going, and gained its own momentum, it's not really been that hard to keep it all going well.

We regularly make small tweaks and improvements (like adding new sections, figuring out how to embed Vimeo videos, adding FAQs, building the Avalon Library, even adding new smilies!). And Paul is ALWAYS improving things behind the scenes, such as reinforcing security, optimizing backups, and much else that as a non-geek I might not even properly understand and which most members might never know about.

Establishing a really good mods team is a big part of making things work well, and that (like forum membership itself) is a kind of rolling road as good people come and go (or take personal breaks) all for 100% utterly legitimate life reasons.

As many reading this will know, we spend a LOT of time collectively trying to get decisions right, almost always acting as a consensus. Very rarely do I ever make an executive diktat decision. ("Guys, listen up: this is what we're doing, and we're doing it now.") We spend a lot of time on considering membership applications, and that really does seem to work... though occasionally we do make mistakes (usually ones involving being too trusting or lenient). It's not a perfect process, but it does seem to be a very workable one.

We also spend a lot of time considering reports: many of them are easily handled (like asking for a post to be moved or deleted, or a thread title changed), but others, which open up major issues for us to think about, may start an ongoing mods discussion that could last for weeks. And we do communicate extensively with members behind the scenes, as some of you will be well aware. That's all part of the ongoing routine maintenance. Or, part of the quality service.

Finally, although this is nothing at all to do with the question asked here, I'd like to take the opportunity, if I may, to state on record once and for all that Private Messages really are Private. A tiny number of members have (sincerely or otherwise) occasionally raised the idea (or even their suspicion or definite belief) that somehow we (or I) read everything. That's so flat-out not true, it can be exasperating.

While Paul tells me he could in theory maybe dig out PM text from deep within the database (because it's all in there somewhere: it has to be) — he's never once tried to do that, and regular non-geek mortals like myself wouldn't have a clue how to access another's PMs even if I had a gun pointed to my head. And even if I did have a clue, which I totally don't, I certainly wouldn't do it anyway. Private means Private. Period.

To close this reply, maybe (in retrospect!) the above diatribe about PMs really does have some relevance. That's because one of the challenges of the job is tolerating the incorrect beliefs that can occasionally start to circulate, and (every now and then, from the vitriol of unsubscribed members posting elsewhere on the net) the deliberate smears.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by sunwings (here)
If I did a keyword search for "I don´t believe in coincidences" your posts would come up over and over again Bill.

Could you expand on your own experiences of life showing itself in this way?

Well, this is another deep metaphysical rabbit hole, rather like the one I described in my post #292 just above.

I don't for a moment believe in faux synchronicities like 11:11, and the like. (Sorry! ) But if one's pondering a question, and then the next day one gets a helpful message out of the blue from an old friend that seems to cast light on the dilemma — without even being asked — then that does seem to be meaningful, and to be noted.

To some degree (not totally! But partially), we do seem to script at least some aspects of our lives. There's definitely more going on in our realities than Newtonian dumb mechanical cause-and-effect. 'Magical' and remarkable things can and do happen, and what is often very incorrectly understood as 'karma' plays a big effect.

As I wrote in my post #154 here, 'karma' is simply our OWN self-moderation (and self-scripting) based on the need to finish unfinished business of any kind one might imagine, resume having a good time with old friends, resume trying to get our own back on old enemies, paying debts, correcting mistakes, making amends, continuing to work towards long-term goals, and so on.

So the events and people we 'need' to meet, in order to do all that, regularly tend to manifest as if scripted in a play or movie. And the other people involved are always part of this invisible storyboarding, too.

Because if I want to hang out again with you this lifetime, you're probably happy to hang out with me, too. Or if you and I have a longterm dispute that's been rolling along for 100 lifetimes, then you're just as hooked by that as I am. So the continuation for yet one more lifetime kind of has both of our votes.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Baby Steps (here)
Hi again

There have been some recent leavers from PA including the mighty Turya.

Did they leave because you said that the Q phenomenon was a bit cult-ish?

Was there a conspiracy to silence or de platform anybody?

Were you concerned that PA was becoming too much of a conservative or Q conspiracy site?

Many thanks

It was hard to understand what happened back at the beginning of September, two months ago. The trouble started when the mods decided to temporarily suspend KiwiElf for 3 days, and edina for 7. That was entirely based on the content and emotion they'd expressed in some posts, and certainly nothing to do with their interests, beliefs, passions or personal commitments.

Such was the sensitivity of that issue (which we were fully aware of), the mods debated it for several days. During that time, both Paul and myself abstained from the discussion, and the decision. The rest of the mods team made the call themselves as a consensus.

I extended a personal e-mail to KiwiElf the day after his suspension lifted, which I can reproduce here.

~~~

Hi there, Shane — this is Bill here, though I'm dropping you this note on behalf of the whole mods team.

The sincere message is simple: we're looking forward to you logging in again, and you've been clear to do so for the last 3/4 of a day. Your contributions through tirelessly reporting the Q posts to the forum community have been really valuable, and if you're able to read the forum, you'll see you've been missed.

You may be surprised to hear me say that, but it's true: we all have to have the data, and that's what you've been reporting so very ably. It's an important job you've been doing, and it's been a lot of daily work over the months. Paul has been substituting in your absence, but he too (of course) very much hopes you'll pick up where you left off as soon as you can, and joins me in saying that.

Take care of yourself down there, and do rejoin the fray when you can.

All our best to you ~ Bill and the Avalon Mods Team

~~~

He never replied, and he never returned to post again. He's still a member in good standing. So is edina. We bear no ill-will to either of them.

turiya was never suspended at all (until much later: read on). His last comment about myself can be seen here. (I can quote it, as it was a public post, still in view.)

Posted by turiya (here)
Hey Bill, come to think of it, it seems you're starting to sound more & more like the MSM (Main Stream Media). Why stop at the term 'cult' or 'cultists'. Perhaps you would just like to call us just a bunch of 'deplorables', and be done with it.... Oh yeah, I forget, somebody has already used that one. Ahhhh, but that would be showing colors - political colors - Its better not go so far, eh?

I replied:

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
I'm calling you out on this. You might want to edit your post to make your points in a rather more friendly and pleasant way.

If you don't know me by now, you never will do. And you should, by now, too. You (and you're not the only one) seem to have lost quite some balance.

There was more in both posts, of course, and turiya replied again. He didn't edit his post, apparently standing by his words. But after that, he pretty much took himself away.

After posting a significant amount of invective about Avalon and myself elsewhere on the internet, which happened to be noticed by one of the other moderators, the team (again, without my input at all) made the decision to unsubscribe him.

I'll make my 'political' position clear about any of these potentially sensitive issues.

1. I'm not an American citizen, but I'm a Trump supporter. I believe he's an unplanned and unexpected wild card that gives us a theoretical chance against the agendas of the NWO. (I was a Margaret Thatcher supporter, too. She played a similar role, but the NWO got rid of her in the end.)
2. I'm an Alex Jones supporter. (But I do recognize that there are one or two anomalies in his presented views that do need explanation.)
3. I'm a BREXIT supporter. (I'd probably oppose anything that was supported by the EU.)
4. I stand against the kind of mass migration that presents a grave risk (which I believe has been carefully and deliberately NWO-engineered) of destroying cultures and cultural traditions.
5. I suspect there have been 4 'Qanons' to date (maybe 5: I've lost count!). My concern with that phenomenon is the cult-like response in some followers. I'm NOT talking about forum members here. I'm talking about America 'out there'.
6. I have no problem with the informational content of any of the 'Q drops'.
7. I support the healthy continuance of all the three current 'Q' forum threads. But in order not to add any fuel to real or imagined fires, I undertook a while back not to make any comments that might be seen as inflammatory or provocative. (The same goes with any discussion regarding Trump.)
8. The mods have a range of personal views about this, as can be expected for a bunch of people with different backgrounds, different nationalities, and different personalities. The mods also have differing views about Trump. And maybe about everything.
9. For anyone to suggest that I somehow sound like the mainstream media is either a cheap, crass, deliberate smear, or a remark that (if sincerely believed) shows a very great deal of unintelligence and unawareness.

[Spellbound]

Bill, in your opinion, will there be a Project Bluebeam / false flag ET invasion / threat launched by TPTB at any point in the future. I was surprised when JP Farrell mentioned it recently as his belief (he said it could actually be put on the fast track, so to speak, as I recall). I know Carol Rosin mentioned it many years back as told to her by Von Braun referring to it as the last card to play after terrorism had run it's course. Someone mentioned in an interview last year (can't remember who) that the Phoenix Lights were perhaps a test run for a Project Bluebeam type of thing (which struck me as a possibility). What are your thoughts on this coming to fruition at some point in our future?

Dave - Toronto

[Hazelfern]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by KingJamesCorona (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by KingJamesCorona (here)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=XeMVMGVSEyA

Mr. Ryan, is this a fair shake on history regarding you and the project Avalon forum?

~~~

I've not listened to it yet. Do I have to?

(That's actually a serious question.)

Maybe you could summarize a few concise questions for me, and then I'll be very happy to respond.

No please don’t, it’s unpleasant to the ears.

Basically Kerry states you were GIVEN project Avalon, to take care of yourself. My question is; Where you in-fact given project Avalon? Kerry also states project Avalon was created together as a sister site. Initially the site was for ’preppers’. Kerry states you became a prepper.

Was Project Avalon given to you? Was project Avalon initially a ‘prepper’ site and social platform for people to socialize?

She states she needed to teach you how to work a camera. Did she teach you filmmaking? She states you failed your mission and she carried it on from there. Do you know what mission she may be referring to? Something in regards to failing the mission in this life. Kerry states you may have been King Arthur, and you don’t like that story very much. Kerry and another (Clairvoyant maybe) through past life recall believe you maybe King Arthur... Do you believe yourself to be King Arthur? Your key witnesses believed they were Knights of the Round Table?

Did you have a girlfriend wanting you to be the lead interviewer during your time with Kerry? Behind the scenes this alleged girlfriend wanted you to get rid of Kerry?

Kerry says you made a big mistake and she hopes you’ll “Pull the sword from the stone again?” That may be an inference as to a return to project Camelot. Seeing as you were a guest on the monetized [In Honor of Bib Dean] video, are you considering a return to Camelot?

Apologies for the format.

Sincerely Mr. Ryan, thank you for taking the time.

Well a couple of riders, at the very start of my reply, may be helpful to add some read-between-the-lines context.

• I've been answering these question in sequence, as I think you will see. My protocol is to thank the post, then respond. (If I've not thanked it yet, it means I've not reached it yet. If I seem to miss something completely, then just bump (repeat) the question, as it will definitely only mean I've been diverted or interrupted, and accidentally lost the place.)
  
  I came upon this question, and decided to take Mara, my dog, for a walk — in the pouring rain. I now feel a little better able to respond.

• Kerry is like the impossible sister I never had. Richard Dolan said it perfectly (and brilliantly), referring a few weeks ago to the late Gordon Novel.

"Gordon, of all the people I love, I hate you the most, and of all the people I hate, I love you the most."

So there are others in the community who are very flawed, and my criticism of them has been fair, honest, straight, but sometimes relatively unforgiving. In Kerry's case, I can't bear ill-will against her. She's my sister. But with that in mind, read the following answers to your questions.

~~~

We started Avalon together, in August 2008. It was originally a resource index for personal and spiritual growth, sustainability, optimal self-health, and so on. The forum was conceived as an adjunct to that.

But as I wrote here in my post #89 here, the forum took off like a wild rocket. We had 7,000 fully active and enthusiastic members within 3 weeks, and a moderators team who had zero experience and didn't even know each other. It was chaos. But that told us that the forum really was the heart and soul of the project.

Kerry didn't 'give' me Avalon. I remember a nuclear firefight we had at one point (we had a few), in late 2008 or early 2009, when we were literally yelling at each other. The neighbors probably heard it half a mile away. I told her that she could take Camelot, and I'd take Avalon. That was kind of burned in my memory.

But the separation didn't actually happen until late 2009. It was crystal clear that we could no longer work together, and I already had the perfect lifeboat. (Not so much a 'lifeboat'. More a ship-to-ship transfer. )

I wasn't ever a member of the so-called 'prepper' community. But after I arrived in Ecuador, in 2011, I set about creating a community which (the plan was!) could withstand anything. (I still have my ham radio, ready to go.)

Two things happened:

1. The community failed, dramatically and catastrophically.
2. The 'prepping' was never needed.

Yes, she taught me how to use a video camera (then, they worked with DVC tapes: no digital memory), and to edit using Final Cut Pro.

I did not fail in my mission.

Here's an interesting anecdote. A young Avalon member came to visit me in July last year, passing through Ecuador. I'd met her a number of times before. She was 25, and one of those delightful, featherlight, sparkling-bright young people who is staggeringly spiritually aware, able and mature for her age.

She told me she had a message for me, that she'd received suddenly and clearly during meditation, and it was important. Of course, I was intrigued.

We went for a walk, and she told me that my mission was complete, and that I no longer needed to worry or fret about always having to do more. She said the battle had been won, that Camelot had been a major part of that tipping point, and that while I could continue to work if I wanted to, there was actually no need to. Because now, everything was going to work out.

That was so astonishing to hear, that I couldn't really make any comment at the time, and can't now. But I've never forgotten it.

I don't think I was King Arthur. However, a couple of people (or maybe 3) have all told me that in the last few years, entirely independently of each other. But I've never recalled that myself. Even if I was King Arthur, it doesn't matter.

The girlfriend that Kerry was referring to is Ruth Huber, in Switzerland. She can be seen translating on stage in the conference we hosted in 2009, and my keystone presentation can be seen here. Ruth is there, too.

Ruth was well aware that my meeting her might be a problem for Kerry, and the very first thing that she did was send Camelot a $300 donation to show Kerry that she meant well. But the moment Kerry met her, which was quite soon after, she (Kerry) was unrelentingly hostile. That never abated. After a short while, Ruth (who is very perceptive, and a spiritual teacher and counselor) grew to dislike Kerry intensely.

Finally, I made no 'mistakes'.

And regarding a 'return to Camelot', every now and then the thought crosses my mind. It'd be a little like Steve Jobs returning to Apple in 1997 to fix the company and turn everything around.

But that would be impossible. Three weeks ago, when Bob Dean passed, and Kerry (very kindly) brought me on to the tribute livestream broadcast, we did a reasonable job together, especially as it was the first time we'd done any kind of show jointly since 2012. Some people who've heard the show were generous enough to say that they think I kept it all together, and I'd not disagree.

Despite Bob's sad passing, it was a kind of feel-good moment. It was a privilege to be able to say a few things on air to honor him. After the show, she and I had a few words on Skype to close off.

Then Kerry, with every good intention and with zero malice of any kind, said something (about me/to me) that was so inaccurate, inappropriate, and utterly divorced from reality that I was literally stopped in my tracks and had no idea how to respond.

I wasn't even upset. Just floored. I made some pleasant remark, and excused myself. Enough. It would be impossible for us to ever work together again.

Spoken as a true diplomat.

She also said that Project Avalon mods are people 'in the know' or something along those lines.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Spellbound (here)
Bill, in your opinion, will there be a Project Bluebeam / false flag ET invasion / threat launched by TPTB at any point in the future. I was surprised when JP Farrell mentioned it recently as his belief (he said it could actually be put on the fast track, so to speak, as I recall). I know Carol Rosin mentioned it many years back as told to her by Von Braun referring to it as the last card to play after terrorism had run it's course. Someone mentioned in an interview last year (can't remember who) that the Phoenix Lights were perhaps a test run for a Project Bluebeam type of thing (which struck me as a possibility). What are your thoughts on this coming to fruition at some point in our future?

Dave - Toronto

Well, it has to be a theoretical possibility: that of a NWO martial law global police state ushered in (and maybe demanded by the people, terrified and wanting protection) because of an apparent 'alien threat'.

It is interesting that Tom DeLonge's TTSA keeps on referring to the 'threat'. Almost as if the public were being primed.

Of course, some ETs may well be hostile, or in other subtle ways malevolent. (Or, at best, their interests may be incompatible with ours.) But if there was going to be an invasion, they'd have been smart enough to do it long before we developed 21st century weapons. They could have chosen their strategic moment any time in the last 10,000 years. Why wait till now?

***

An anecdote that may be of interest. We once asked Henry Deacon about Project Blue Beam. His reply was that to stage a false flag invasion, a holographic light show wouldn't be necessary: the classified military services could 'fill the skies' (his words) with their own solid, real, highly advanced craft.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Hazelfern (here)
Spoken as a true diplomat.

[Kerry] also said that Project Avalon mods are people 'in the know' or something along those lines.

It's becoming clear I have to say more about this. onawah asked here:

Posted by onawah (here)
Bill, would you be comfortable going into more detail about your following remarks?

To which I replied in my post #258:

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
I'm fully acknowledging this important question. I'll come back to that later. It's bookmarked. It needs a very long and careful reply.

I've not listened to Kerry's interview, but man oh man, her view of reality (and history!) differs very substantially from mine. If she really said that 'the mods were in the know', that's true, inasmuch as the longstanding moderators, as very close trusted colleagues, all know what really went down at Camelot in 2009-2010. So do my closest friends.

Over the years, I've mentioned one or two things peripherally in posts here and there. I've let it all drop, and moved on. The community didn't need the drama, and Kerry didn't need the bad publicity. Our early work was too valuable for me set about tarnishing Camelot's name myself.

But for some reason that defeats me, Kerry keeps on bringing this up. The problem is that what she seems to sincerely believe happened, just isn't what happened at all.

This is very difficult. We're not talking about small things here. The issues were major. And as I mentioned above, Kerry's a kind of sister. It's very hard for me to overtly criticize her. With the Mark Richards issue, as best I can see, she's been wrong-headed and unwise, and both of those adjectives may be understatements. This is a newly-surfacing major case in point, and may not go away anytime soon. I fear it will end in tears. I don't like to see that. I tell you.

I've been there, seeing Kerry's tears. They broke my heart, twice, on two separate occasions. She's not [just] the defiant iron warrior she presents herself as. She's very vulnerable.



The bottom line is that Kerry's judgment is very, very flawed, on a number of issues, and has been for quite a while.