The Qanon posts, and associated US political analysis

[A Voice from the Mountains]

Posted by Paul (here)
Many clues over the last year have suggested that some of the upcoming trials will be held under the U.S. military justice system, rather than under the more commonly used domestic judicial system.

What's crazy to me is that I remember a guy (can't remember his name or background) giving an interview not long after Trump won in 2016, before he was even inaugurated, and he was already saying that this meant military tribunals and that they would be going back through old commercials and everything hunting down pedophile symbolism and putting an end to these people for good.

At the time, I just filed that away for future reference, but since then I've seen a lot of moves in that direction. Guantanamo and other isolated prisons being expanded, military code of justice being updated multiple times, Lindsay Graham bringing up military tribunals at the Kavanaugh hearings...

Instead of the "day of the rope" we may be getting something more like a year or two of ropes being handed out. And this will have to be international in scope. There is no other way it can be done without them seeking havens. Chinese officials being arrested in Canada and vice versa is just part of this pre-show imo. China closed itself off to the West to protect itself from this same international network in the first place. Like Russia, I'm sure they would be happy to help dismantle the New World Order.

Remember, Xi invited Trump into the Forbidden City. Ever see him do that for Obama? Hell, they didn't even roll out a red carpet for Obama's plane, they had such contempt for him.

[ThePythonicCow]

.
This post on 8ch.net/qresearch leads to an excellent article on the Daily Caller, providing an overview of the breathtaking scope of the FBI’s unprecedented criminal efforts to steer a presidential election and frame a newly elected president.

The article concludes that the FBI needs to be reconstituted ... by moving out remaining vetted, honest FBI agents to another agency, such as the U.S. Marshalls, and then collapsing the FBI.

The FBI has become too corrupt to be reformed.

From How The FBI Ran An Illegal Counterintelligence Masquerade In Plot To Get Trump (DailyCaller.com):

====

FARRELL: How The FBI Ran An Illegal Counterintelligence Masquerade In Plot To Get Trump

Chris Farrell, 3:00 PM 12/20/2018

In examining the cast of FBI and senior Department of Justice (DOJ) officials fired, retired, resigned and under investigation since May 2017, the breathtaking scope of the FBI’s unprecedented criminal efforts to steer a presidential election and frame a newly elected president serves as Exhibit A for the organization’s disbandment. The “leadership” that willfully and corruptly ignored Hillary Clinton’s criminal mishandling of highly classified information had no problem faking a counterintelligence investigation to smear and destroy President Trump.

A recitation of the FBI/DOJ Litany of Shame is called for: Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Baker, Ohr, Yates, Priestap, Rybicki, Kortan, Campbell, Turgal, Bower, Steinbach, Giacalone, Laufman, Carlin, McCord — there are more, and eventually we’ll learn their names. Some took unlawful action draped in the American flag and smarmy self-righteousness. Some were careerists craving a retirement paycheck and a strong resume, standing by and doing nothing — negligent or complicit with guilty knowledge

The group dubbed the “Secret Society” by FBI lawyer Lisa Page in a text to self-anointed FBI “Super Agent” Peter Strzok had a clear goal: Stop Trump. But how to do that “legally”? How does one manufacture a phony Russia hoax and hang it around Trump’s neck when you’re constrained from going after his campaign, organization and staff?

The FBI is specifically prohibited from penetrating and subverting U.S. organizations under the provisions of Executive Order 12333, Section 2.9: “No one acting on behalf of agencies within the Intelligence Community may join or otherwise participate in any organization in the United States on behalf of any agency within the intelligence community without disclosing his intelligence affiliation to appropriate officials of the organization, except in accordance with procedures established by the head of the agency concerned and approved by the attorney general.” That’s tough for the “secret society.”

Could they — would they — rely on Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and have her office generate a legal finding memo? An actual, discoverable, legal record detailing and authorizing an operation against a presidential candidate? Too risky on a few levels.

But there’s more to Section 2.9: “Such participation shall be authorized only if it is essential to achieving lawful purposes as determined by the agency head or designee. No such participation may be undertaken for the purpose of influencing the activity of the organization or its members except in cases where: (a) The participation is undertaken on behalf of the FBI in the course of a lawful investigation; or (b) The organization concerned is composed primarily of individuals who are not United States persons and is reasonably believed to be acting on behalf of a foreign power.”

That second portion of Section 2.9 was exploited by Strzok & Co to create the predicate for a foreign counterintelligence investigation overseas that would then be “imported” back into the United States — circumventing the prohibition on “Undisclosed Participation in Organizations Within the United States.” Using this technique, Strzok & Co wouldn’t be offensively targeting the Trump operation to subvert his election and presidency. The FBI would now be “reacting” to a foreign intelligence threat.

Hence, we have the widely reported (FBI designed and orchestrated) events surrounding Carter Page, George Papadopolous, Stef Halper, Joseph Mifsud, Alexander Downer, et al. Super Agent Strzok even traveled to the United Kingdom (the safest “Outside the Continental United States” [OCONUS] operating environment for the FBI) to grease the skids for a counterintelligence “dangle” operation. The reader will recall Lisa Page’s December 2015 text message: “You get all our oconus lures approved? ,” to Strzok.

Having personally run double-agent operations as a counterintelligence case officer, I’m not guessing at this language and intelligence tradecraft.

Thrilled with the initiation of their foreign counterintelligence investigation implicating Trump “associates,” (and laundering the criminality of their end-run of “undisclosed participation”) the secret society could launch full-bore with an array of techniques and tradecraft. Keep in mind that the FBI/DOJ never gave Trump a “defensive security briefing” that is standard when FBI/DOJ comes upon a foreign counterintelligence threat to a U.S. organization or corporation. Never.

Not coincidentally, the “Trump Dossier” appears on the scene — thanks to Hillary Clinton and Democratic National Committee funding, via a couple of cut-outs, to actual Russians (a crime actually worth investigating). Next come the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants, predicated on Hillary’s mercenary’s lies. Now we know the FBI went so far as to phony-up investigative reports (“302s”) in the related framing of LTG Mike Flynn. Is there anything the FBI/DOJ leadership wouldn’t do to stop Trump?

Here’s the big picture: there are the crimes described above — and there are the crimes to facilitate and then cover-up the underlying activity. That’s where the FBI got lost. It’s gone. No sensible American believes in the organization anymore. The DOJ is right there with them. Compromised, arrogant, ruthless, vindictive, detached, self-righteous, hypersensitive to criticism and largely immune. A fish rots from the head down. Go back and read the FBI/DOJ Litany of Shame. Review Comey’s arrogant, smug, Flynn-interview statement: “something I probably wouldn’t have done or maybe gotten away with in a more … organized administration.”

The answer is to create an investigative division within the U.S. Marshals Service and laterally transfer over vetted, honest FBI agents. Collapse the decayed wreck of the FBI within six months and hope the American public can once again believe in “Equal Justice Under the Law.”

Chris Farrell is director of investigations and research for Judicial Watch, a nonprofit watchdog group. He previously worked as a counterintelligence case officer.

====

The above Daily Caller article, which I came upon thanks to the work of other anons on 8ch.net/qresearch, is a prime example of why I find the work of Q and of some (not all, just some) of the Qanon's who are digging into these matters valuable.

We are witnessing unfold before us the exposure of some of (not all of, of course, but some of) the more outrageous corruption in U.S. government history ... which is quite interesting to those such as myself who have been watching this corruption grow deeper and darker over the last few decades.

The Teapot Dome Scandal of President Harding's time, back in the 1920's, was well before my time, and while I was aware, as a young man, of the Watergate Scandal of President Nixon's time, in the 1970's, this was before I had much idea how "things really worked" in that swamp known as Washington, D.C.

This scandal, when you combine not just the FBI/DOJ malfeasance described by Chris Farrell in the above Daily Caller article, but also a list of other crimes that is too long to list in any detail in this post, is larger by far than Teapot Dome or Watergate.

The crimes include pedophilia, global drug, arms, organ and child trafficking, global "charity" fraud, theft and money laundering of many billions of dollars and of thousands of tons of gold, wars leading to the deaths of perhaps a million innocents, the destruction of entire nations, treasons and lies, rapes, murders (e.g. the Clinton body count), blackmail, assassinations, 9/11, and on and on ...

Some very, very, serious swamp draining is needed, and we may just be seeing some of it.

[A Voice from the Mountains]

First Michelle Obama "admitted" recently that she had to use in vitro fertilization to have kids.

Now this book is on sale at Wal-Mart, presented here without additional comment.




Yes, this is real.

Okay, one additional comment: What a great use of typography! It's almost like someone is trying to tell us something.

[crosby]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=B1rMlGr-6IY

Latest IPOT summary on most recent Q drops.
crosby

[Zanshin]

Posted by A Voice from the Mountains (here)
First Michelle Obama "admitted" recently that she had to use in vitro fertilization to have kids.

Now this book is on sale at Wal-Mart, presented here without additional comment.




Yes, this is real.

Okay, one additional comment: What a great use of typography! It's almost like someone is trying to tell us something.

Well this really is old news for many Voice -

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=UBeVJ9TFofM

I'm fair certain Joan was dead about 1 - 1 1/2 months after letting this slip, although I've read accounts of people sure they heard that distinctive voice
out the back of some fancy L.A. joint.

The implication being - O.K. Joan you blew it, so we'll kill you publicly, because your daughter and others would create too much havoc if we did it for real.

[Richard S.]

Posted by Zanshin (here)

Posted by A Voice from the Mountains (here)
First Michelle Obama "admitted" recently that she had to use in vitro fertilization to have kids.

Now this book is on sale at Wal-Mart, presented here without additional comment.




Yes, this is real.

Okay, one additional comment: What a great use of typography! It's almost like someone is trying to tell us something.

Well this really is old news for many Voice -

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=UBeVJ9TFofM

I'm fair certain Joan was dead about 1 - 1 1/2 months after letting this slip, although I've read accounts of people sure they heard that distinctive voice
out the back of some fancy L.A. joint.

The implication being - O.K. Joan you blew it, so we'll kill you publicly, because your daughter and others would create too much havoc if we did it for real.

Well that was a low blow...

Did you know about the book, that was what he was informing us about?

Not fun when people inform us and then get clobbered as if they were hiding under a rock, coming out to reveal something others have no idea about...

[mgray]

The winter solstice could be D-Day: Dark to light. My take

[norman]

Not exactly Q News, but very relevant, I think.

What "adversaries" are the Space Force and Space Command going to be dealing with ?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=8yuyQalqJpg

NEWS AND VIEWS FROM THE NEFARIUM DEC 20 2018

Giza Death Star Community

[Praxis]

Posted by norman (here)
Not exactly Q News, but very relevant, I think.

What "adversaries" are the Space Force and Space Command going to be dealing with ?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=8yuyQalqJpg

NEWS AND VIEWS FROM THE NEFARIUM DEC 20 2018

Giza Death Star Community

So what I am understanding from this video is that Space Force will be to Space Command what Fleet Forces Command is to all the Combatant Commands.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United...Forces_Command
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Combat_Command

I wonder if they will keep it as a functional command or make a fully functioning combatant command.

I think it is interesting that they are making it military based and they are positioning it to be a war fighting domain as they say.
SHould this be the way it is done?

Or should we have a StarFleet that has a military component to it but with a primary mission like Peace corps?

I think it says alot that they are positioning it as a military apparatus.

[Ratszinger]

Posted by Praxis (here)

Posted by norman (here)
Not exactly Q News, but very relevant, I think.

What "adversaries" are the Space Force and Space Command going to be dealing with ?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=8yuyQalqJpg

NEWS AND VIEWS FROM THE NEFARIUM DEC 20 2018

Giza Death Star Community

So what I am understanding from this video is that Space Force will be to Space Command what Fleet Forces Command is to all the Combatant Commands.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United...Forces_Command
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Combat_Command

I wonder if they will keep it as a functional command or make a fully functioning combatant command.

I think it is interesting that they are making it military based and they are positioning it to be a war fighting domain as they say.
SHould this be the way it is done?

Or should we have a StarFleet that has a military component to it but with a primary mission like Peace corps?

I think it says alot that they are positioning it as a military apparatus.

My guess is more like the Coast Guard which houses many branches of government including but not limited to the US Public Health Srvc. and the US Indian Health Service both of which commissioned corp. officers wear navy uniforms with coast guard buttons just like the coast guard does. This way they could put many branches of government under one 'Health Service' oriented name sort of like a Red Cross of the space frontier I suppose.

[A Voice from the Mountains]

Posted by norman (here)
Not exactly Q News, but very relevant, I think.

What "adversaries" are the Space Force and Space Command going to be dealing with ?

By the kinds of off-hand remarks from high-ranking officials that Farrell cites, apparently they're not even human.

Otherwise I would have suspected that it was the breakaway Nazi space program, but I have a feeling that that conflict ended around 1952 when those UFOs kept appearing and disappearing over the Capitol in Washington DC. Both the US and USSR administrations, ironically enough, seem to have made friends with the remnants of the Nazis during the Cold War, judging by the incorporation of former officers and scientists into their ranks. I'm not even convinced that the US and USSR were the real adversaries during the Cold War, if you really look at the details of what was going on during those decades.

This was the checkmate that Admiral Byrd warned us about:





It was July 12th, 1952, seven years after WW2 ostensibly ended (there were never any treaties to actually end WW2).

I would love to know what has actually been going on all these years, but the disinfo is so thick that it's crazy.

[A Voice from the Mountains]

Just came across this old post that someone fished back up for the shutdown:

[ThePythonicCow]

.

December 21, 2018

From https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/4408289.html#4408964

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 12/21/18 (Fri) 09:42:54 9cade3 (1) No.4408964

File (hide): 4c044bb73d47088⋯.jpeg (31.94 KB, 360x345, 24:23, FAKE NEWS.jpeg) (h) (u)

Why do people trust the FAKE NEWS media?
Anons can play this game all day long.
Compare & Contrast.
FAKE! FAKE! FAKE!
Q

From https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/4409035.html#4409412

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 12/21/18 (Fri) 10:12:27 879143 (1) No.4409412

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...28583419088896
HUSSEIN "ISIS JV TEAM…."
Did ISIS form on HUSSEIN's watch?
Did HUSSEIN take care of business or allow them to expand?
How long did it take POTUS to ERADICATE and DESTROY ISIS?
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE WAKING UP TO THE TRUTH.
https://www.investors.com/politics/e...rged-by-obama/
Why did HUSSEIN attempt to destroy our military (weaken)?
What was the 16-year plan to destroy America?
Why did HUSSEIN install traitors at the highest levels of our Gov't?
Think DOJ.
Think FBI.
Think C_A.
Think NAT SEC.
Why did HUSSEIN bring people into the WH who HATE AMERICA and what we stand for?
What years did HRC serve as Sec of State?
What years did ISIS expand?
Why did HUSSEIN put restrictions on US MIL COMMAND re: ABILITY TO ATTACK TARGETS AT WILL > WH DIRECT APPROVAL REQ FOR EACH ACTION?
FACTS NOT FICTION.
BLIND SHEEP FOLLOW.
EYES ON TARGET.
Q

[ThePythonicCow]

I listen to Youtube videos, including various Q analysts, while doing stuff in the kitchen, rather like housewives in the 1960's would listen to soap operas on TV while doing house work.

A couple of the Q analyst Youtube videos (long, chatty, not worth uploading) that I've listened to in the last couple of days have speculated that the deep state has decided that Hillary Clinton is expendable, but is still determined to protect former US President Barack Obama.

These analysts then go on to speculate why Obama is the "king pin" who must be protected, in their view. I have not found their speculations persuasive. For example one analyst figured that destroying Obama's legacy and reputation amongst many voters wouldd destroy the leftist-socialist politics, in the U.S., that Obama stood for.

My speculation is different.

I suspect that yes, Obama is protected behind a "red line", that must not be crossed. But I suspect that this is because Obama was a Manchurian Candidate, a massively false pretense, with a massively false biography. His words, his life, his views, his parentage, his college record, his marriage, his "wife", ... fake, fake, fake. If this fakery started to seriously unravel in the public eye, then that would start to expose the bastards in power who were behind that fakery. That must NOT be allowed to happen.

Who controls the CIA? Who controls the Rockefellers? Who controls Soros, Gates, Bezos, Zuckerberg, Warren Buffet, Larry Page and Larry Ellison? Who controlled Barbara and George H.W. Bush, and John McCain? Who controls Bill and Hillary Clinton?

Who constructed Obama from "whole" (actually, quite damaged) cloth? Who controls the CIA's MKUltra program?

... they who must not be named.

[crosby]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=tU9HiNzmo8w

Latest update from IPOT.

crosby

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Paul (here)
Who constructed Obama from "whole" (actually, quite damaged) cloth? Who controls the CIA's MKUltra program?

... they who must not be named.

Notice that institutions do not conceive and create evil.

Institutions are mechanisms, tools, means to an end.

Evil, manifest through the hearts, minds and spirits of evil beings (humans and/or other such) create and operate organizations that carry out their evil intentions.

Who created and controls the CIA?

The struggle continues, in perpetuity.

[Ron Mauer Sr]

Posted by Paul (here)
Who controls the CIA? Who controls the Rockefellers? Who controls Soros, Gates, Bezos, Zuckerberg, Warren Buffet, Larry Page and Larry Ellison? Who controlled Barbara and George H.W. Bush, and John McCain? Who controls Bill and Hillary Clinton?

Who constructed Obama from "whole" (actually, quite damaged) cloth? Who controls the CIA's MKUltra program?

... they who must not be named.

Just wondering about the layered hierarchy of control. If this needs to be kept a secret, that means they are vulnerable.

[A Voice from the Mountains]

Posted by Paul (here)
Who created and controls the CIA?

Good question.

CIA Director Reveals He Was Once a Communist Sympathizer

In 1976, future CIA director John Brennan was a college student disgusted by Watergate and the “system” that produced it. As the young Brennan surveyed the political landscape, only one candidate seemed to be speaking the truth about the need for real change (and/or the dictatorship of the proletariat) — Communist Party nominee Gus Hall.

But by 1980, Brennan grown out of Marxist-Leninism, realized American-style capitalism was the one true way, and decided to devote his life to Uncle Sam’s intelligence apparatus. Or so that former pinko now claims.

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2016/...mpathizer.html


This was before Brennan was stationed in Saudi Arabia where he also picked up a great interest in Wahabist Islam.

I wonder why the media worked so hard to discredit Joseph McCarthy? When the USSR collapsed, a lot of documents came out on USSR espionage operations that proved McCarthy was right.

[Ratszinger]

The way John Kerry ran off to Antarctica to report to someone about the election after Trump won one has to wonder if the true rulers everyone answers to don't reside there at the south pole area.

[A Voice from the Mountains]

Posted by Ratszinger (here)
The way John Kerry ran off to Antarctica to report to someone about the election after Trump won one has to wonder if the true rulers everyone answers to don't reside there at the south pole area.

Antarctica is where the Nazis had set up a U-boat base back in the 1930's.

It's where Admiral Byrd's expedition was sent in 1947, the same year as the Roswell Incident, and five years before the UFOs over Washington DC.

Byrd came back from Antarctica saying we would have to face an enemy who could fly from pole to pole at amazing speed. Put it all together: The Nazis invented the first flying saucers for military purposes and they were never really defeated during WW2.

Post about UFOs over Washington above is related.

Nazis and Communists had competing international networks following WW2 and there are several decades of hidden diplomacy and history that we are not privy to. We'll never know the full story until we learn what really transpired during the Cold War.