WADE FRAZIER : A Healed Planet

[Icare]

Hi Wade,

this is David Icke's take on Gates. He says Gates knows exactly what he is doing and calls him a psychopath who is utterly evil.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=PmeN39295xI

Looks like he's not that far down the food chain.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Icare:

I am not a big YouTube guy, but I listened to most of that. Icke actually used my work as a reference in one of his books. From what I listened to, Icke did not present anything to back up his “psychopath” accusation about Gates and his “cult” membership. You don’t need to invoke some kind of conspiracist explanation for Gates’s donating to the BBC and then getting softball treatment from them. I present far worse examples in my work (1, 2). Ed and Noam’s Propaganda Model explains the vast majority of media behavior, and does not need to invoke some kind of conspiracy. I am not saying that conspiracies don’t exist (I have borne the brunt of some pretty big ones), because they do, but I don’t buy the invoking of conspiracies as the primary explanation for elite behaviors and the structures of our societies.

IMO, it is easy and kind of lazy to invoke global conspiracies to explain what we are seeing on the global stage today with the coronavirus. I have a brother with an IQ of about 75 who rants and raves publicly just like Icke does, and on the same subjects in the same way.

There are lots of problems with conspiratorial explanations of world events, and one of the most pernicious is that it turns the elites into one more out-group and fosters the delusion that if we just expose or neutralize them somehow, then all will be well. I have written about the Global Controllers for many years, but they don’t have to micromanage the situation. Just keep technologies like free energy and antigravity out of the public’s hands, and the rest pretty much takes care of itself. Just keep them mired in scarcity and fear, and they will do most of the GCs’ dirty work, gratis. That was the single greatest lesson of my journey.

I am not a mind-reader, and don’t know exactly what is going on in Gates’s head, and neither does Icke.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Once the Dulles brothers found themselves ensconced in the White House, the USA took a steep slide into some scary times. John Foster sold Eisenhower on a “cheap” form of foreign policy. Instead of sending in the troops to maintain the Empire, just threaten target nations with nuclear weapons. John Foster’s style of “diplomacy” became known as “brinksmanship.” If that didn’t work, then another “cheap” way to prevail was through covert action, and that was where Allen stepped up with the CIA. In 1953, on behalf of the oil companies, the CIA overthrew Iran’s government, after it nationalized its oil. The CIA overthrew a democratically elected government in favor of a dictatorship. It was a catastrophe for the Iranian people, which reverberates through that part of the world to this day. Under the Shah, Iran had the worst human rights record on Earth, with torture chambers, summary executions, and it wiped out all left-leaning organizations. When the revolution finally came, the only institution not wiped out was the Islamic church, which is why Iran is a theocracy to this day.

The next year, the CIA overthrew the Guatemalan government, on behalf of United Fruit, because its democratically elected leader tried to nationalize some of United Fruit’s unused land to give to landless peasants, as part of land reform. That leader was a fan of Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal. A string of dictatorships followed the coup, which eventually evolved to outright genocide of the peasants in the Reagan years.

Overthrowing governments was Allen’s favorite activity. In those same years, the USA took over for a failed France in Indochina. The USA generously funded and armed France’s imperial effort in Indochina, but when it finally pulled out in 1954, after failing to regain its empire in Indochina, the USA stepped up, with a series of manipulations that led to genocide in Southeast Asia, which claimed several million lives, on top of the millions lost in the Korean intervention, which my father participated in.

All of those death camp Nazis that the USA hired led to programs such as MKUltra (founded in 1953), and nearly led to World War III. In those same years, the USA campaigned to fluoridate the USA’s water supply, as a highly toxic industrial waste got a makeover into compulsory “medicine,” which is added to my tap water to this day, and a “bonus” is that it also damages the brain. At the same time, the face of modern medicine spearheaded the “research” and ad blitz for an asbestos cigarette filter, believe it or not, and the same man previously ran a McCarthy-ish “war on quacks.”

Reagan and Nixon made names for themselves as commie-hunters, and Joe McCarthy simply followed their lead. In 1959, a Latin American nation finally threw off the imperial shackles, and the USA has waged warfare against Cuba, in one way or another, ever since. Che Guevara was in Guatemala when the CIA overthrew its government. He learned his lesson and helped the Cuban Revolution become successful. The CIA later helped kill Guevara in Bolivia, as he tried to export the revolution, and the CIA began overthrowing Latin American governments right and left in the 1960s, which culminated in Operation Condor in the 1970s, and death camp Nazis found new usefulness under the CIA’s patronage, such as Walter Rauff, who worked for one of Dulles’s favorite Nazis, Wolff, in Italy. Before the death camps had gas chambers, Rauff invented mobile gas chambers, in which up to 250,000 people died. But he was part of Dulles’s and Wolff’s Operation Sunrise, so he was eventually spirited to South America, and hundreds of old Nazis attended his funeral in Pinochet’s Chile in 1984, which was accompanied by lusty group cheers of “Heil Hitler!” You couldn’t make this stuff up.

Via Marchetti again, in 1959, the Office of Naval Intelligence ran a fake defector program, to infiltrate spies into the Soviet Union under the guise of disillusioned young Americans, and one such “defector” was Lee Harvey Oswald, who not only “defected” but had a security clearance and worked on the base in Japan where the U-2 flights were launched. Not only did Oswald “defect,” but he did it in a highly theatrical way, by handing over his passport and announcing that he intended to give the Soviet Union national security secrets that he was privy to while a Marine. It was the most damaging “defection” in the history of the Marine Corps. If you read the official accounts that came out of the Warren Commission, Oswald walked around amongst his fellow Marines, spouting Marxist ideology and calling people “comrade.” My father was a Marine in the 1950s, and it is complete and utter BS that a Marine would have been able to act that way, especially at a highly sensitive military base. His fellow Marines would have killed him, gratis. My father did not believe the story of the Marxist Marine for an instant.

Even leaving aside the John Tower conversation, the evidence is overwhelming that Oswald was on a military intelligence path, which eventually brought him under the auspices of the CIA. When his stint in the Soviet Union was finished in 1962, he returned to the USA. Instead of facing the firing squad, he was welcomed back to the USA with open arms, a fact that Castro publicly remarked on, the day after JFK was killed, and the day before another “Lone Nut” killed Oswald, permanently silencing the self-proclaimed “patsy.” Anybody who believes the Warren Commission’s version of events, primarily authored by Allen Dulles himself, has been smoking the really good stuff.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

You can’t read much about Allen Dulles without getting the idea that he was the master of deceit and duplicity, and it wasn’t about serving mom and apple pie, either. His acolyte, James Jesus Angleton, said, as he unburdened his conscience soon before he died:


“Fundamentally, the founding fathers of U.S. intelligence were liars. The better you lied and the more you betrayed, the more likely you would be promoted… Outside of their duplicity, the only thing they had in common was a desire for absolute power…If you were in a room with them, you were in a room full of people that you had to believe would deservedly end up in hell. I guess that I will see them there soon.”


The Incubus of Intervention is not a JFK assassination book, but is about how Dulles led the interventions in Indonesia that led to Suharto’s rise. Suharto was responsible for three separate genocides: the one of ethnic Chinese when he came to power, which likely killed at least a million people, the one in East Timor, a decade later, which is likely the greatest proportional genocide of an ethnic group since World War II, and in Papua New Guinea, to make way for Indonesian “settlers.” Noam and Ed wrote at great length on Suharto’s reign. Ed was writing about Suharto 50 years ago, it was a focus of his and Noam’s first (suppressed) work together, and Ed would later compare Suharto to Pol Pot and to Kagame, who was their worthy successor in the genocide department, as an American official called Kagame “our kind of guy.”

In The Incubus of Intervention, the author described how Dulles became uniquely skilled in the spy game, and was able to manipulate people from afar and keep his “chess pieces” in play for generations, with only a nudge here and there, and his pawns did not even know how they were being manipulated. When I read that, it took me back to my days in the free energy field. For nearly all of their victims and pawns, when the GCs mess with people, they rarely even suspect who messed with them or why, or even that they were messed with. Their lives were wrecked or prematurely ended, and they had no idea what really happened.

So, Dulles was a master of that kind of manipulation and subterfuge, and even though not a JFK assassination book, The Incubus of Intervention had a chapter on George de Mohrenschildt and his relationship with Dulles, going back to his oilman days in Indonesia, and his links with Dulles go back to the 1940s, and maybe even to the 1930s, as Dulles looked after Rockefeller interests, as he did for his entire adult life. Dulles actively kept oil discoveries in Indonesia from JFK, in order to keep JFK’s attention off of Indonesia, and de Mohrenschildt was involved. In Manufacturing Consent, the ideological filter that Ed came up with was anticommunism, which in fact was the American media’s ideological rallying point when it was published, as it had been since the Russian Revolution, but after the Soviet Union collapsed, then new ideological rallying points were concocted, and the “War on Terror” sufficed. Noam later said that the filter should have been more generalized in Manufacturing Consent, as the portrayal of a malevolent external threat, to frighten the populace into huddling under the state’s “protection.” Protecting the public has long been the greatest protection racket on Earth.

John Foster Dulles was a more rabid anticommunist than Allen was, but in The Devil’s Chessboard (p. 247), it described Khrushchev’s puzzlement in 1958, five years after Stalin’s death, when John Foster was as rabid an anticommunist as ever, and rejected every olive branch that Khrushchev offered. Dulles’s intractable anticommunism wasn’t really about communism at all, but to keep the malevolent threat alive, to hold the American alliances together, under the constant prospect of war. That was what was needed to keep the entire ballgame going. John Foster’s crusade was really about keeping the “permanent war” that Orwell wrote about alive and well. When JFK tried to end the Cold War, that was when he had to go, as he was jeopardizing the entire charade. Khrushchev similarly had to fight against his own people more than he did JFK, as they played the same game and knew that the end of the Cold War was bad for business.

Late in his life, Werner von Braun was apparently privy to that game, and told his assistant that successive boogeymen would be trotted out to scare the public, so that they would huddle for “protection” under a global dictatorship:

• Soviet Union
• Terrorists
• Asteroids
• Extraterrestrials

He did not mention a global pandemic.

If you study Oswald’s life much, it is amazing how such a rabid “commie” was immersed from childhood in a milieu of fervent anticommunists, and I mean people who truly despised the Soviet Union and communism in general. It went back as far as his days in the Civil Air Patrol, where he met David Ferrie. A rich oil man was a founder of the Civil Air Patrol and also owned the book depository, where the fateful shots that hit JFK were allegedly fired from, in one of the many “Isn’t that an amazing ‘coincidence’?” aspects of the JFK hit. Ferrie and that Civil Air Patrol co-founder were as rabidly right-wing as they came, but their efforts somehow produced a commie and provided him with his assassin’s perch.

Similarly, you can’t study Oswald much to find recollections of him that were diametrically opposed to how the Warren Commission portrayed him. When he “defected” to the Soviet Union, people who knew him in his Marine Corps days assumed that he was merely playing a military intelligence role. One pal knew it was the case when there was only a perfunctory investigation launched at his base over his “defection.”

George de Mohrenschildt was a “White Russian,” and White Russians were members of the Russian aristocracy before the Russian Revolution. The White Russians were largely run out of the Soviet Union, after they lost their Western-sponsored counter-revolution against the “Reds.” So, de Mohrenschildt came to the USA as a refugee from the Soviet Union, and was as rabidly anticommunist as they come. When Oswald the commie defector miraculously came back to the USA, with a Russian wife to boot, who was raised by a KGB official, de Mohrenschildt took Oswald under his wing. When de Mohrenschildt arrived at Oswald’s humble home to “befriend” him, he was accompanied by Colonel Lawrence Orlov, who was a close friend of the CIA’s handler in Dallas, J. Walton Moore, and de Mohrenschildt later said that Moore suggested that he “befriend” Oswald. Otherwise, de Mohrenschildt would have not had anything to do with Oswald “in a million years.”

But de Mohrenschildt’s Warren Commission testimony was the key to giving Oswald his motivation, but in the same testimony, de Mohrenschildt contradicted himself and said that Oswald admired JFK. When Oswald handed out his “Fair Play for Cuba” flyers, and created a public incident, similar to his “defection,” he operated out of the same building as rabid anticommunist Guy Bannister.

You have to swallow mountains of contradictory information like that to believe that Oswald was the commie Lone Nut who killed JFK by himself, even putting aside the John Tower conversation, and you can take it to the bank that Gary wrote about it to the best of his recollection.

The day that the Warren Commission’s successor contacted de Mohrenschildt, he “committed suicide,” which neither his wife nor anybody else with a clue really thinks was a suicide, and just how witnesses died like flies around the time of the Warren Commission, de Mohrenschildt “committed suicide” on the same day that Charles Nicoletti was murdered, who was also scheduled to appear before the same commission. Nicoletti was a hit man for Sam Giancana, who was murdered just before he was to testify before the Church Committee, on his relationship with the CIA and their attempts to assassinate Castro, and Giancana was even under police protection when he was murdered.

As Gary also knew, Jack Ruby was no two-bit hustler, but a high-ranking mobster. More “coincidences” like those are coming, and the central role that Allen Dulles played in them.

Best,

Wade

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Hi:

For a little more on Oswald and his “commie” credentials, in July of 1957, he was assigned to the El Toro base. My father was discharged from the Marines at about the same time, and spent his last months as a Marine as a boot camp drill sergeant at nearby Camp Pendleton. It was during those stints at Camp Pendleton (before and after going to Korea) when my parents fell in love with Southern California. When he got out of the Marines, my parents moved back to Washington, immediately began procreating, and I was born the next year. My father began attending the University of Washington in 1957, and upon graduation in March 1963, he got a job at a Navy base in Ventura County, and other than the one-year stint at NASA, he never left. I am not kidding about somebody like Oswald getting killed by his fellow Marines, if he began spouting Soviet ideology. My father told me that unpopular soldiers often ended up dead by “mistake,” and in the next imperial undertaking, American soldiers even coined the term “fragging” to describe it. I have a close relative who was nearly killed in a training accident back in the 1990s, while another soldier was crippled and one was killed, and the army covered it all up.

Oswald’s roommate at El Toro, James Botelho, who became a California judge, has recently publicly spoken about Oswald, and has strongly denied that Oswald was assassin material. Botelho also stated:


“Oswald was not a Communist or a Marxist. If he was I would have taken violent action against him and so would many of the other Marines in the unit.”


After Oswald “defected,” his base performed an “investigation,” but Botelho stated:


“It was the most casual of investigations. It was a cover-investigation so that it could be said there had been an investigation….Oswald, it was said, was the only Marine ever to defect from his country to another country, a Communist country, during peacetime. That was a major event. When the Marine Corps and American intelligence decided not to probe the reasons for the ‘defection,’ I knew then what I know now: Oswald was on an assignment in Russia for American intelligence.”


When Oswald’s commanding officer, John Donovan, was questioned by the Warren Commission, he was amazed that he was not asked any questions about the U-2 program and Oswald’s involvement. He even asked why they weren’t asking any U-2 questions, and they essentially told him to shut up. I have written before on how the Warren Commission treated its witnesses, so no need to belabor it, but they failed to call certain witnesses, intimidated others, many “conveniently” died before they could testify, and they even altered witness testimony, so that all “evidence” would support the foregone “Lone Nut” conclusion. Dulles even mailed a “Lone Nut” book to all of the Warren Commission’s members before they ever convened, as he primed the pump.

Here is a summary of more than 60 people whom Oswald was in contact with, who may have had or certainly had intelligence connections, and that is all aside from the John Tower conversation.

One of the more intriguing documents to surface was the minutes of a CIA meeting in 1967, overseen by Angleton, on how to respond to Jim Garrison’s prosecution of Clay Shaw in connection with the JFK hit. Angleton’s assistant believed that Garrison would “indeed” secure a conviction of Shaw. A key person of interest in the Shaw matter, David Ferrie (whom Oswald met during his Air Patrol days), was already dead, within days of the splash of Garrison’s investigation. Garrison wrote extensively on how the spooks undermined his effort.

I have long stated that “solving the crime” has never been the point of my JFK writings, but instead on what a sham the entire Warren Commission was, as all official “investigations” like that are. That is my point. Our system is not worth believing in, and if and when the Fifth Epoch arrives, these kinds of activities will longer make any sense, and will all go into the bloody dustbin of the human journey.

However, I will present some information on where I think the trail to the real assassins generally heads, and what their motivations were.

Best,

Wade

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Hi:

Here are some parallels between Dulles and what I heard about my close relative, the contract CIA agent. Dulles was once asked, in a social setting, what he did about double agents. He quickly replied that he would have them killed, and then qualified that as a hypothetical question and answer, as he urbanely smoked his pipe. Well, my relative had a suspected double agent on his team, and he did kill him. He said that he did not relish the job, but it was his job. My relative was not a psychopath, but the patriot/macho/James Bond pitch worked on him, like it did on Ralph McGehee. Ralph eventually figured it out, while my relative probably never did, but he drank himself to death, which was almost certainly a price of his secret life. Langley is full of zombies who figured it out, to one degree or another, are trapped in the CIA, and shuffle through the halls, counting their days to retirement.

When a big covert operation began, Dulles’s “plausible deniability” MO was to be out town, on some kind of “business,” which he did when the Bay of Pigs operation was launched, for instance. When I found out about my relative’s secret life, the household-name diplomat that he worked for had no official position in the American government. It was an entirely private operation. That aligns with what John Perkins was taught, as the CIA’s covert activities were privatized after the operation to overthrow Iran’s government, so that they could not be traced back to the USA if they were exposed or failed (a strategy that partly failed with the Iran-Contra Scandal). All of that was really only a fig leaf, which the accomplice media could run with, to deceive the American people. Nobody else on Earth was too deceived by it all. Immediately after the Bay of Pigs debacle, which was designed to fail, to goad JFK into calling in open air support, but JFK refused to, there was an attempted military coup in France, over de Gaulle’s desire to pull in his imperial horns in Algeria, and as the attempt was taking place, de Gaulle’s staff publicly accused the CIA of being behind it. An assassination attempt the next year nearly killed de Gaulle, which was eerily similar to how JFK was murdered, which de Gaulle frankly discussed when he attended JFK’s funeral.

A CIA operation murdered the Congo’s first elected leader, and they did it just before JFK was inaugurated, as Dulles knew that JFK would never approve such an operation. If you read enough on Dulles, you will get a flavor of the way that he “briefed” American presidents, basically with a series of lies designed to goad the president into approving covert action. After the standard goading briefing by Dulles, Eisenhower ordered Lumumba’s murder, and after he was killed, an eventual CIA station chief drove around, with Lumumba’s body in his car’s trunk, as he thought about how to dispose of the body. JFK’s stance toward Africa was diametrically opposed to Eisenhower’s, who privately called African diplomats “niggers” and didn’t want them coming over to the White House, while JFK even invited African diplomats into his private White House quarters to meet Jackie and the kids. No American president ever treated Africa better than JFK did.

JFK was notorious, going back to when he and his brother visited Dorothy Day, for how he would go and see for himself what the situation was. When he was a young Congressman, he would simply show up at people’s homes in Indochina, to hear straight from them what was happening. JFK quickly became bored with Dulles’s briefings and soon fired him, and JFK made the memorable statement that he would break the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the wind.

But, after Dulles was fired, all of the CIA officials who had worked for him kept reporting to him, as if he had never left. Dulles built up a facility known as The Farm, which is still run by the CIA. When JFK was murdered, Dulles immediately went to The Farm, where he spent the weekend, which saw not only Oswald’s murder by Ruby, but a highly questionable autopsy of JFK. That was bizarre behavior for a man with no official role in the American government. But as with my relative and his household-name diplomat boss, they actually have a freer covert action hand when they are not officially on the American payroll, consistent with that privatization drive.

While Gary often went down Conspiracy Alley in his work, and often for good reason, Rodney Stich avoided “conspiracy theories” when he could, but when he began going public on how an airline/FAA alliance covered up crashes of commercial airliners, he began to be approached by various spooks, usually disillusioned CIA contract agents. Stich was kangarooed into prison for his trouble by the CIA, as they worked in concert with the awesomely corrupt judicial system in California.

One of the most surreal aspects of the entire JFK hit affair was that not only did de Mohrenschildt know Dulles from the 1940s and probably earlier, he also knew Jackie Kennedys’ mother, and he “handed off” Oswald at a “party” to the woman who took in Marina Oswald, Ruth Paine, whom Dulles was also very familiar with, going way back, as he shuttled around his chess pieces. That woman’s home was where all of the backyard photo “evidence” came from, which I consider to be all planted, just as the book depository rifle and magic bullet were, in order to frame the “patsy” Oswald.

After de Mohrenschildt testified to the Warren Commission, he actually went to Jackie’s mother’s home, to discuss it with her. Jackie’s blood-spattered suit from Dallas was in her mother’s attic. Guess who shows up? Allen Dulles, who was a neighbor! He quizzed de Mohrenschildt on his testimony, and de Mohrenschildt later said that Dulles’s presence at his Warren Commission testimony was a “threat” that he heeded, but he could not stay completely silent, and wrote “I’m a Patsy” soon before his “suicide.”

Best,

Wade

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Thanks Bill and crew, for getting the forum back up!

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Time for another vaccination post. RFK, Jr., has been attacked by his own family for his vaccination stands. I know that territory all too well. If you read about anti-vaccine activists anywhere in the mainstream media, they are all portrayed as tin-foil-hatters at best, and menaces to the public at worst. I have written about RFK, Jr.’s work recently (1, 2), and I was reading his recent presentation on various health outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations. Not only is the germ theory of disease questionable, and an entirely different paradigm has been marginalized for more than 150 years, but RFK, Jr.’s articles show how vaccination produces many deleterious health outcomes.

Among the people who attack antivaccinationists, you will almost never find an honest assessment of the risks that RFK, Jr., and many others point out. Any so-called benefit has to be weighed against those risks, and what is most pernicious about vaccinations and other insults is that while there are violent reactions to vaccinations, including death, mostly they inflict chronic conditions, whose cause is not obvious. The statistical case made by the studies that RFK, Jr., cites, on vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations, can be very dramatic, such as a seven-fold risk of autism, an eight-fold need of vaccinated boys for special education, a ten times increase in mortality for vaccinated infants girls in Africa, a 30-fold increase in the rhinitis allergy, an eight-times increase in asthma, a three-times increase in Crohn’s Disease and multiple sclerosis, seven times increase in miscarriage risk, a 25-times increase in narcolepsy, a five-times increase in respiratory conditions in young children, and on and on.

Vaccination, like fluoridation, like drugs and surgery, has a sordid history, and it is a violent intervention that damages the patient. The proponents of all of those treatments had tremendous conflicts of interest, and the Big Lie of orthodox medicine is that those conflicts either don’t exist or are of minor importance, but they are all-important. It is very similar to Ed and Noam’s Propaganda Model of the media, which is essentially a conflict-of-interest model.

In the USA, fluoridation is compulsory, and we are living through a pronounced effort to make vaccinations compulsory. Grim times. In the Fifth Epoch, virtually none of today’s violent, invasive, and lucrative treatments will exist, and prevention, not intervention, will be the byword, food processing companies won’t exist, and greed will no longer be a virtue.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

When I reread a lot of the Michael Material recently, and came away with a new appreciation of it, one passage near the beginning of the first book struck me, when Michael was asked what the meaning of life was, and Michael replied:


“There is no exalted purpose behind human life. The life itself is the purpose and is only one stage of evolution, which proceeds in an awesomely ordered, unalterable line until the created in effect evolves to become the creator. We prefer to not use the word god in speaking of the ultimate creative force of the universe.”


Similarly, Michael was asked what the purpose of Creation was, and answered:


“To insure the continuous creative force is the only purpose we know.  The entities, no longer earthbound, experience lengthy periods on the high planes and at the end, reunite with the primeval force which is creation.  Thus, the created becomes the creator, and the cycle repeats itself ad infinitum.  This is infinity.”


Michael constantly stressed that life on Earth as a human is about choice, and that there are no bad or “wrong” choices, nor are any lives “wasted.” Our incarnation cycles are about making choices and learning from them, but over lifetimes that the soul chooses, not the personality, and that is the cruel part of the deal. Abridging another’s choice in a way that harms them creates negative karma, which is always balanced (AKA “paid back”), and all souls do that to each other, here in physical reality, at least on Earth. That can be small comfort in our vale of tears on Earth, but Michael stated that that was because so few souls want to learn through joy, but instead choose fear as the crucible of learning.

Well, my work in helping bring about the Fifth Epoch can be seen as trying to help a world manifest in which we learn through abundance, joy, and love, and leave scarcity and fear in the dustbin of the human journey. Anybody with me?

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Last week, somebody started another thread at ATS about my work. As I recall, it was seeing my work discussed at ATS that got me to rejoin forums after several years of not interacting with the public, and it was also the ATS experience that helped me decide to stop joining forums, until I could build my own, as ATS was a troll haven. The ATS experience was one of several instances in which the trolls actually ganged up with the admins to attack me, erase my threads, and even ban me from the forums (here are more recent examples - 1, 2). It was kind of surreal. I only joined forums where I saw my work discussed in a constructive manner or was invited into them, but even though that new ATS thread was a positive discussion, I’ll never take that “bait” again. I would only join another forum that had somebody like Bill running it. It was a very pleasant surprise to see that Bill learned the same lessons that I did about all-comers forums with anonymous participants, and he did the same thing that I was planning to do one day.

Well, there is one other forum that I joined, a special-purpose JFK forum, which featured my JFK writings. That forum is rather moribund, but I also made it clear to the admin that I would not subject myself to troll swarms any longer, and that forum has not had any. But, with the steep degeneration of discourse on the Internet, and how venues such as Wikipedia seem to be disinformation projects, I don’t foresee that I will be joining many efforts in the future, but I’ll have to roll my own, with a little help from my friends.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

In my work, and not just the JFK issue, I stay in close orbit to my experiences, those of my relatively small circle, documentation that is easily verified (such as matters of history), or the reproducible data that makes up the corpus of today’s science. When I depart from mainstream stances, it is always tightly aligned around those data points. And, even when it is “only” my experiences or those of my circle, I always put it in a context that is easily verified, and I reveal as much as I am publicly able to.

I leave many people anonymous in my work, to protect both the innocent and the guilty, but nearly all of those identities are easily discovered with only a little digging (getting Dennis’s The Alternative yields most of them). For the extremely few who leave their armchairs and do a little work, the reality of what I write about is richly rewarded. I underplay my pedigree and the bona fides of those around me, and have revealed a lot of it only after people have died and will not be subjected to what I have been through. I won’t subject anybody to that if I can avoid it.

My work has levels of it, both in the subject matter and how irrefutable it is. For example, nobody has ever credibly challenged Ed and Noam’s Propaganda Model. The statistical cases that Ed has made, on worthy and unworthy victims, on the media’s use of the word “genocide” and the like have never been credibly challenged and never will be; they are irrefutable, and Ed and Noam’s critics have been reduced to lying about their work and engaging in personal attacks, and my experience with trying to remove the libel from Ed’s Wikipedia bio kind of says it all. There is nothing to rationally dispute about any of it, and my assailants have literally had to make it up as they go.

When I finally ran NASA’s gauntlet and got Brian’s bio published, a leading space “skeptic” immediately took it upon himself to “debunk” Brian’s Martian credentials, in one of the most idiotic exercises that I ever witnessed. That is the caliber of challenge that my work receives, when it is not outright trolling.

When I have documented my adventures with Dennis, the reader is inundated with documentation from the most credible participants (1, 2), data on Dennis’s equipment, to establish it as the world’s best heating system (1, 2, 3, 4, 5), which it still is, which Dennis put on customer’s homes for free, in the most benevolent and brilliant business effort that I ever saw or heard of, but all that his assailants can do is lie about it (1, 2), and others parrot the lies, ad infinitum, as the hit men and women swarm. There is literally nothing to rationally dispute about my account, so my assailants don’t even try, but engage in personal attacks, meaningless obfuscations and misdirections, logical fallacies, and the like.

But, for the people I seek, I provide as solid information as I am capable of, and for those who make it into my inner circle, they are treated to far, far more, which establishes the reality of free energy technology (or as much as I can without them actually getting a show of their own), its organized suppression, and much, much more. I hang a lifetime of meat on those bones, for the few who are willing and able to chew it.

But that is really only the introductory stuff, and it takes a lot of work to develop the perspective that I think is needed for my approach to work, and I have long written about what the people I seek will have in common.

On the JFK hit, I try to take my readers through the data that is indisputable, the material that is only slightly speculative, and I also get into the surreal aspects of it, but try to keep the material as grounded as possible. When ETs come into the JFK issue, my data points include Doug Caddy’s final conversation with E. Howard Hunt, what some of Greer’s Disclosure Project witnesses reported, and I try to stay away from the speculative stuff if I can. Greer’s pursuit of that “alien” corpse has been embarrassing to witness (1, 2), and I tried mightily to get Brian over the hump on the Moon landings issue, but the best I got was his final statement, which I have never gotten anybody to ever reproduce or refer to, and I interacted with all of the big names on the issue.

I have plenty more to write on this issue.

Best,

Wade

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Wade Frazier (here)
Hi:

Last week, somebody started another thread at ATS about my work. As I recall, it was seeing my work discussed at ATS that got me to rejoin forums after several years of not interacting with the public, and it was also the ATS experience that helped me decide to stop joining forums, until I could build my own, as ATS was a troll haven. The ATS experience was one of several instances in which the trolls actually ganged up with the admins to attack me, erase my threads, and even ban me from the forums

Maybe off-topic here, but just a footnote. I'm as sure as I can be that ATS is a CIA asset/front.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Bill:

Actually, that is very much on topic. Thanks for bringing this up, as it gives me an opportunity to make a post that I have never made before. Let’s just say that I had encounters that that were very curious, even leaving aside the troll swarm, followed by my being banned there. However, my experiences there were fairly typical, and highlight that whether it is a CIA front or not, or if the trolls were on the payroll or not, it is hard to distinguish the two, as most of the attacks are done by the general public, gratis, so that the professionals rarely need to lift a finger. Here is one of the curious issues. I am more than half convinced that Mr. Skeptic was on the payroll, and he stalked me on the Internet for more than a decade. He heaved a disinformation bomb at me wherever I appeared, and he would also do it with the site/forum admins, which I think helped get me booted out at least once. His bomb was comprised of about 20 bullet points of lies and half-truths about Dennis and his journey (which actually inspired this quiz), intended to overwhelm the reader, to convince them what a criminal Dennis was and, by extension, me.

Looking back nearly two decades, some dates are kind of hard to exactly place, but I stopped interacting with the public, and removed my email address from my site, around February 2002, as the attacks in the wake of 9/11 became increasingly insane and threatening, but what capped it off was when that former friend criminally attacked me and went after my relationship with my mother, which I will not forgive in this lifetime. I had no interaction with the public for more than a year, but during that quiet time, my work was being promoted by various people, and one was a New Age activist, who is still at it, I believe, and she was promoting my work and publishing my writings as the drums began beating for the invasion of Iraq, around when I finished my site in September 2002. Her work led to my first interview, in the spring of 2003, which has never been published. In the next few months, I resumed my career and Brian asked me to help him found NEM. Not long after she began promoting my work, Mr. Skeptic contacted her with his disinformation bomb, and it was kind of the beginning of the end for her and me.

One of the first forums I ever joined, and maybe even the first, was a Velikovsky forum in 1997 or 1998, and an engineer attacked me as I joined, denying that Mr. Mentor’s engine was in any way remarkable, that Dennis was legitimate, etc. I have a lot experience with this. But I found some pals there, including my eventual editor. That interviewer tried to get me active with the public again, invited me to join a free energy forum, and I did, only to be attacked, dismissed, etc. Those interactions inspired this little passage, and it was around the same time that I joined that forum that I saw discussing my work, Mr. Skeptic heaved his bomb on my thread, on the day that I joined, and kept up the attacks, with a string of invective. It was a breathtaking attack, and happened in June 2003. I think that that was my last forum experience until I joined ATS in May 2006, as I began to come out of hibernation. In July 2006, I spent that fruitless month interacting with Richard Stallman, who is a stereotypical Level 3. I wrote my most positive essay in those dark years around that time, so I can see that I was slowly crawling out of the abyss, but then came Hurricane Dennis in August, inviting me to the White House, and that almost sent me over the edge, and I finally got professional help once again, again at my wife’s insistence, and the clouds finally began to part in late 2006.

During 2007, I kept posting at ATS, where a troll camped on my primary thread (who was also a Wikipedia free energy troll) other trolls came and went, and they finally ganged up on me enough so that I was banned at ATS in October 2007. I joined other forums in those days, where I saw my work discussed, and without fail, the trolls came swarming. Here Mr. Skeptic is, bombing onto a thread in a forum, I suppose you could call it, in February 2007, less than a week after I posted there. How did he do that? How could he even know about it? He must have had some kind of global surveillance system going, to see when anything was written about me or by me on the Internet. It might have been due to some kind of obsessive Internet surfing, searching for anything written about me or Dennis, or maybe it was something more professional. You can see when he bombed that thread, and then somebody made some posts after his that showed how his organization seemed to be a front organization.

Not long after I began posting at ATS, somebody joined (JIMJAMJERRY or something similar), and invited me to post to his new forum. He even created a special section of his forum just for me. I began posting there, very similar to how I post at Avalon, and I recall making 80 posts or so, over a few months. After about a month of posting, Mr. Skeptic joined that forum and contacted me, about four years after his previous attack. I think it was a PM, not a post, as I rack my memory, and I made it clear that I was not interested in interacting with him. Well, about a month or two later, Mr. JIMJAMJERRY unceremoniously erased that entire section of the forum devoted to my work, and never even notified me. To be fair to him, I had been quiet for a few weeks, mentally preparing for my first public interview, but I am sure that he heard from Mr. Skeptic, and I imagine that he used his handy disinformation bomb on him.

When that happened, that was when I decided to be quiet until I made my own forum. But the next year, you and Kerry interviewed me with Brian, I began carrying Brian’s spears again, and in early 2011, I saw my work being discussed in the Avalon forum, and here I still am.

But what was very curious was that as Mr. Skeptic stalked me, and contacted me through Mr. JIMJAMJERRY’s forum, he never made a peep at ATS. Was it because other trolls were getting the job done there, or he had a little professional courtesy toward ATS? Dennis was convinced that Mr. Skeptic was somehow on the CIA’s payroll. I’ll likely never know for sure, but it sure was strange that he stalked me in those days, but left me entirely alone at ATS, where I had a highly visible presence.

There were other oddities at ATS, such as that another famous debunker set up shop at ATS not long before I joined. I just looked him up, and he is still going strong at ATS. I once interacted with one of his debunking targets, and I was informed that that debunker would boast of his national security associations (NSA, CIA) when engaging his targets. In this milieu, when somebody debunks you, and boasts of his CIA and NSA connections as he does it, it is more than a vague threat.

Soon after Dennis was run out of the USA, Mr. Skeptic quietly folded his tents and disappeared from the Internet. Did he get a bonus? Were his services no longer required? I’ll likely never know, but that troll/admin phenomenon is alive and well. In 2016, a gullible admin swallowed the disinformation on Dennis on the Internet, hook, line, and sinker, and finally chased me out of a forum that I had been invited into (in which the trolls were so bad that I had to close my original thread). In 2018, I was in a JFK assassination forum when a troll bombed my thread, and then the admin erased my thread! That was about a month after I tried to remove the libel from Ed’s Wikipedia bio, to only have the admin charge in and erase it all, before the likely intelligence asset even needed to roll out of bed.

Anyway, that was “fun” to recall, and I don’t plan to do it again, but thanks for bringing it up, and yes, it would not surprise me at all to discover that ATS is a front for the CIA or similar party.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Last year, a journalist began writing about Brian, and I submitted what I thought was a nice comment to that article, but it was never published on that site. I just discovered today that that journalist was just getting warmed up (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). Brian died nine years ago in July, and this is the first time that I have seen anybody outside of the fringes write about Brian since his death, and he really had no mainstream coverage since the early 2000s, when that Fox TV show on the Moon landings “ambushed” him.

For mainstream writings about Brian, I was pleasantly surprised at how sympathetic the journalist was in writing about Brian, even though some I thought was a little misguided and hemmed in by Establishment assumptions, and some was uninformed. However, she writes for the mainstream, so I understand her biases and even sympathize with them. Noam and Ed rarely took even hack journalists to task, as they realized what kinds of constraints that they worked under.

Anyway, it was interesting reading, even if some of it was my words. That journalist wrote that my work is the closest thing to a biography that exists on Brian today, and that is true, but is too bad. My guess is that a professional biography of Ed will come before one on Brian, and my work will have to do until then.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

As Brian’s biographer, I kind of have an obligation to respond to those recent articles about him. For years, Brian downplayed his astronaut past, as it kind of got in the way of his post-Establishment work, but like how my public accounting background follows me around in my career today, there was no escaping Brian’s past at NASA. Those articles focused on his NASA days, although not always, and I’ll begin my response by stating, again, that I was pleasantly surprised that the author wrote about Brian fairly sympathetically.

Believe me, it was no fun to field the attacks and debunkery related to Brian while he was alive, and after his death, if he is ever mentioned in the mainstream, which is rarely, it is often disparagement, stating that he went around the bend into New Age conspiracism, free energy fantasies, etc. I have never seen one of his assailants willing to fairly deal with the facts, even the very public ones, which is identical to how Dennis has been attacked over the years, and even Noam, Ed, and Howard. So, it was refreshing to see Brian’s life written about in the mainstream in a way that was not a personal attack, debunkery, or calling him crazy.

I had a courteous exchange with that author. I guess that I need to set the record straight on the only mention of Brian’s Martian credentials in those articles, here. The author wrote:


“A planetary scientist by trade, O’Leary applied for and joined NASA’s ranks in August 1967 with the overly optimistic hopes of being one of the first Mars astronauts – even though by the late 1960s many NASA programs, including the Apollo lunar missions, would face drastic budget cuts.”


Perhaps it was innocent, but the author conflated why Brian applied to NASA and why NASA picked him. Becoming an astronaut to go to Mars was not on Brian’s mind when he applied. Humans had not even left Earth orbit yet. Going to the Moon or into an orbiting science station was what was on Brian’s mind when he applied. When he was asked/ordered to go to Mars in his astronaut interview, it blew him away. As I have written, it has to be in the top-ten most bizarre job interviews in history.

Also, the above passage seems to show Brian’s hoping against the odds when he joined NASA that his space dreams would survive the budget cuts. However, the first cut happened in August 1967, after Brian had already been hired in July. So, that sentence is misleading in two ways: conflating why Brian applied with why he was picked, and misplacing the budgets cuts, which did not happen until after Brian was hired. Again, maybe it was innocent.

To give a little more background, when Brian saw that ad for astronauts in September 1966 (he applied in November), it was at the time of “peak headiness” over NASA’s ambitions. When I toured my father’s “office” in the Mission Control room in December 1966, and he gave me his security badge from the Gemini 12 mission, that was at the very peak of American optimism over manned space exploration. The Gemini missions went off with few hitches (after one of Mr. Mentor’s rocket scientist pals helped save the space program, and Gemini 8 nearly ended in disaster), and next on deck were missions to send men past Earth orbit, to the Moon. The next month, the bloom began to come off the rose with the Apollo 1 disaster, which drove my father from NASA, as the environment at NASA became hyper-political, with everybody in CYA mode. The American military took vengeance on my family for my father’s abandonment of the Space Race, and his career was largely scuttled afterward.

A few weeks after I left Houston (and I have not been back), Brian was having his astronaut interview, and NASA still had big plans, which led to Brian’s surreal interview. It even got stranger for Brian, when he was selected with a Mars mission in mind, but on his first day on the job, his boss, Deke Slayton, informed Brian and his colleagues that NASA was losing the budget battle against the Pentagon, and he encouraged them all to quit, on their first day on the job. Those were some of the strangest months of Brian’s life. Four of the eleven people in Brian’s astronaut group resigned, mainly over a lack of spaceflight opportunity, and of the seven remaining, the first got into space in 1982, after a 15-year wait. That was precisely what Brian’s colleagues warned him against when he applied to NASA: he would waste the best years of his scientific career in astronaut training, which had little to do with science.

In this article, there is this passage, which is kind of fun and sympathetic reading:


“You can envision a bespectacled O’Leary, age 27, walking around Houston’s Manned Spacecraft Center, looking bewildered, out-of-place, and anxious as he realizes he got himself waaaaaaaay in over his head with a job he can’t quite fulfill. Many of us have been exactly where O’Leary was at the time – except unlike us, his resignation would be broadcast all over the world.”


Brian was never really astronaut material, more of a poet at heart than a soldier, so the quasi-military culture of the astronaut corps was alien to Brian’s personality, and he definitely did not fit in well at NASA. If not for von Braun’s Mars dreams, there is no way that Brian would have been hired.

I have more to write on this subject.

Best,

Wade

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Hi:

Last week, I was put in the strange position of defending Bill Gates, by somebody who posted a YouTube clip of David Icke’s playing mind reader on Gates. That YouTube account was terminated a few days later, I am fairly certain, because of some “terms and conditions” “violation,” which amounts to censorship. I am not linking to that post today, because the Avalon forum is down, where I have posted for nearly a decade, as it tries to recover from a DDOS attack.

Freedom of speech in the USA has always had a rough ride, and we don’t really have it today. Noam and Ed’s first collaboration was subjected to one of the most outrageous instances of censorship in the USA in my lifetime. However, it was done by private interests, not the government, so Noam could not find any so-called “libertarian” or “human rights” organizations that even cared what happened to their book. The account of the censorship has been censored itself in Ed’s Wikipedia bio, by a likely intelligence asset, whom Jimmy Wales has never failed to defend, and when I tried to correct the record, my work was summarily erased by a Wikipedia admin, as he spouted insults, baseless allegations, threats, and swearing, by using tortured logic that even Wikipedia admitted was invalid. That is what happens at Wikipedia when you try to correct libel and censorship.

When Noam and Ed finally published something that wasn’t censored, a chorus of lies has been directed at that work for more than 40 years, led by Western “intellectuals,” of all things, and Noam used that situation as an example of how Western intellectuals have been brainwashed far worse than is found in totalitarian countries. It only echoed what Orwell stated long ago, in the censored preface to the West’s most read political book of the 20^th century.

Near his life’s end, Ed was asked about his most significant contribution to scholarship, and he replied that it was his media analysis, and how the idea of a “party line” applies to so-called “democracies” as much as it does to totalitarian countries. When Ed died, one of the best journalistic eulogies was delivered by Matt Taibbi, and Taibbi has recently written on the censorship that is accompanying the coronavirus epidemic, and one of my favorite journalists, Caitlin Johnstone, is specifically defending Icke’s freedom of speech, while knowing nothing about Icke, and suspecting that he is as crazy as he seems. She is doing it in the same spirit as Noam’s defense of a Holocaust Denier. As Noam said, if you don’t believe in freedom of speech for views that you despise, then you don’t believe in freedom of speech. These are strange days indeed, when the greatest war criminal of the 21st century is being rehabilitated by “liberals.” That is little different from Germans’ pining for the good old days when Hitler ruled.

This entire issue is trying for me, on several levels. As I wrote recently, and have written for many years, the so-called “science” around Western medicine is anything but unbiased, and is dominated by vested interests whose paramount concern is raking in the money. In my lifetime, I have watched practices that I was ridiculed for when young, and books have been banned and burned, in The Land of the Free, to now become embraced by Western medicine. I don’t trust anything that we are seeing today on the coronavirus, coming from the voices of authority, and I will avoid compulsory vaccination to the extent I am able, but you also won’t find me on the capitol steps, protesting the lockdown. To those who want to, more power to them, but militant “protest” has no place in my life. I am after much bigger game, and I have a plan that will work, if I can find the people for it. The race between education and catastrophe is being waged in earnest today.

Best,

Wade

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Hi:

Sometime this month, I will shave off my beard. I usually grow it for a month or so, every several years, to see how gray it is getting. This is the third time that I have done it in the past 12 years, and I am attaching “the progression of gray” images, going back to 2001.

These days, American men seem to be in a “shaggy dog” contest, as barbershops are closed and people are homebound. But the current leader of the pack is Uncle Noam!

Noam is 91, so can be forgiven for looking this way (and will further fuel the inevitable and accurate comparisons to Einstein), but I imagine that the media will present images like that as Noam’s epitaph, not pictures of him in his prime. The youngest one of Noam at Wikipedia is from when he was nearly 50.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

This article in that series on Brian was relatively sympathetic, and I appreciate that author’s attempt to get at Brian’s motivation. When I hosted Brian at my wife’s parents’ home, over breakfast, the morning after that eventful day, they asked him why he wanted to go into space, and he said something like, “To explore, to see what was out there.” That was a very understandable motivation. But Brian never fit into the command culture of NASA. The Space Race was a Cold War project above all else. It was not until Neil Armstrong went up in Gemini 8 that the first American civilian went into orbit, but Armstrong had also been in the military. My father was an ex-Marine who was recruited from the Navy, and anybody working in Mission Control had to have a top-secret security clearance.

The military culture was everywhere at NASA, and especially in the astronaut corps, which Brian got shocked into during his first morning at NASA, as Shepard led an astronaut briefing that was essentially a fighter jock briefing, the kind that they have on aircraft carriers. Brian quickly realized that he was the only person in the room wearing glasses, and he hastily removed them. It was all downhill from there, as Slayton told Brian’s XS-11 astronaut class that NASA did not need them, and encouraged them all to quit, right after Shepard’s briefing. Brian’s flight school experience, on his second solo flight, when he messed up his landing approach, was only the last straw. Also, there was a very distinct pecking order among the astronauts, as they all jockeyed with each other to be assigned to missions. The previous group of scientist-astronauts was at the bottom of the astronaut pecking order until the XS-11 astronauts joined up, and those hapless recruits were at the very bottom of the barrel for the next decade. It was 15 years before the first of the XS-11 astronauts went into space.

The only reason why Harrison Schmitt walked on the Moon was due to a great deal of political maneuvering, as NASA was under pressure to put at least one scientist on the Moon, on the final Apollo mission.

Much has been made of Brian’s unwillingness to become a pilot, and flying T-38s in particular, when astronauts were dying like flies in them, and it is true that Brian quit immediately after his second solo flight. Brian was not a natural pilot, did not have the soldier’s “follow orders” mentality, and he was a wise-ass at NASA. He was definitely a fish out of water in Houston.

Repeatedly in those articles, Brian’s disdain for Houston was remarked on, and it was true. But, like soldiers who follow orders and don’t complain, Brian was also about the only astronaut candid and honest enough to publicly discuss what nobody else would: the only reason why Mission Control was in Houston was because of Lyndon Johnson’s (LBJ) pork barrel politics. It was well-known that Johnson was the reason why it was in Texas, but Brian assailed that situation, writing that because Mission Control was not in someplace like the West or East Coast, it would never attract and retain the best and brightest. One pal worked there to put up the ISS, and he confirmed the sad slide at Mission Control into a deeply dysfunctional environment, with nepotism and chasers of lost glory dominating the place, and he was brought in from the outside as a contractor because NASA could not depend on its employees to get the job done. He said that in pre-launch meetings, the most humble person in the room was the astronaut-CAPCOM, while the rest jockeyed for position.

Brian became quite the NASA gadfly after he left the astronaut corps, and as I discovered while getting Brian’s NASA bio published, the reasons for a lack of a NASA bio were purely political, and NASA was being disingenuous when they stated for many years that the reason was that Brian did not sign a release form.

Of all the mass-murdering thieves who have been the American president, starting with the first, LBJ might have been the dirtiest. He was the primary immediate beneficiary of JFK’s murder, and the wink that he traded with a Congressman, as he was being sworn in next to a blood-spattered Jackie, is an indelible moment in American history. Doug Caddy had one of the most improbable trajectories in American history, and E. Howard Hunt’s telling him that JFK was murdered over the “alien presence” issue brings in many lines of evidence that no astronaut but Brian would have dared touch, and not even he did, so it is up to people like me, who will discuss what almost nobody else in the USA will. Not only was Caddy sucked into the Watergate issue by Hunt, who was definitely involved with the JFK hit, Doug’s preposterous journey took him to Texas, where he dug into LBJ’s past. Texas politics is infamously corrupt, right up there with California, and Caddy investigated LBJ’s rise. LBJ had his own hit man. Today, Caddy is among those calling for a reopening of the JFK assassination investigation, and Caddy’s contention is that LBJ’s hit man was involved with killing JFK.

After nearly igniting World War III over Cuba, and JFK had to override all of his hawk advisors to avoid invading Cuba, which would have likely led to a nuclear holocaust, JFK was trying, in earnest, to end the Cold War. Khrushchev staggered through his residence, in tears, in the days after JFK’s murder, as he knew that JFK was the only chance at peace that he had.

JFK was a reluctant imperialist from the outset (I depart from Noam on this issue, as did Michael Parenti), but as his tenure as president progressed, JFK became committed to ending the Cold War, and that, more than anything else, is why he was murdered. I regard the “alien presence” issue as more of a “last straw” than the overriding reason. JFK tried to end the Space Race soon before he was murdered, as he proposed a joint mission to the Moon with the Soviet Union. My guess is that JFK’s planned sharing of the “alien presence” with the Soviet Union was related to his planned joint mission to the Moon, as the USA expected to encounter ETs on the Moon, and Brian’s life was shortened over the UFO issue.

The Space Race was not even supposed to happen, and that I lived in Houston, in the home state of the immediate beneficiary of JFK’s murder, who may well have been involved with it, is one of the many ironies of my life.
Brian devoted a chapter of The Making of an Ex-Astronaut to Houston and how much Brian hated living there. I heard the same thing from my father. Brian was raised in Boston, where he rubbed shoulders with Bobby Kennedy, and moved to Houston from Berkeley, while my father moved from Ventura County. Houston was like another world, compared to the California coast or Boston, where I also lived. My memories of Houston included some rather harsh ones, and you could not pay me enough money to live there. You could not pay me enough to live in California, either, but for different reasons.

However, as sympathetic as that author was to Brian, it was still a mainstream account, and it suffered for that. This article, on Brian’s “magical thinking,” is way off-base, for several reasons. The author speculated that Brian died prematurely because he shunned orthodox medicine. Brian’s life was shortened because of the American military, when he began snooping into UFOs. All of Brian’s friends knew that that “heart attack” is what set Brian on the downward health trajectory that shortened his life.

In fact, in his life’s last years, Brian did get skin cancer, which was cured by an alternative treatment, and then Brian’s savior was kidnapped by the FDA from Ecuador, as it once again did something that not even Hitler could get away with. That is another example of what I call “Justice, American-style.” Brian fled to South America, fearing for his life, after Mallove’s murder, and even then, he could not escape the long arm of the USA. Julian Assange knows this well, as well as what a vassal the Ecuadorian government is.

A mainstream author cannot begin to touch on subjects like these, for various reasons, and Ed and Noam’s media analysis lays out much of why that mainstream author couldn’t. But, even with those great limitations, that author was doing her best to be sympathetic to Brian, living within restrictions that that author is likely not even aware of.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

In that article on Brian’s last years, the title kind of says it all: “Decades of Magical Thinking: Dr. Brian O’Leary’s Final Years.” Magical thinking, when used to describe a scientist, is to infer that science has been abandoned in favor of pre-scientific thinking (religion, superstition, a belief in magic). Brian explored the paranormal as a scientist, and advocated scientific testing. His “magical thinking” was along the lines of Elizabeth Rauscher’s or Ed Mitchell’s.

That article also mentions Brian’s “skepticism” on the Moon landings, and in particular his ten seconds on that Fox TV show. For the record, that Fox crew ambushed Brian under false pretenses. When they approached him, they said it was to discuss Cydonia, and for hours, it was discussed. As they were wrapping up the interview, they asked the Moon landings question, which was what they were really there for. It was a standard media ambush. Brian regretted those ten seconds for the rest of his life, and not because he had doubts about the Moon landings, but because of the firestorm of controversy it caused, which wrecked his remaining relationships with his astronaut colleagues and overwhelmed everything else about him in the public eye.

To that author’s credit, that article is the first time that I have seen Brian’s final statement mentioned. When I was doing battle on Brian’s Wikipedia bio, and the Moon landings issue dominated it (which has mercifully disappeared, and will likely never reappear, and for that, I suppose I am grateful), I could not get anybody to host it, so that I could refer to it. You can see some a**hole editor of Brian’s bio erasing my changes, as I was referring to my own site, which is why I contacted all of the big names on the issue. Finally, nearly a decade later, somebody at least mentioned it, but the Moon landings section was eventually erased by a sensible editor, who knew that it really had no place in Brian’s bio, or a footnote at most, not its own section. Even though that a**hole admin whacked Brian’s bio down to stub, at least that Moon-landings stuff is gone.

For the record, Brian did not come up with his Moon landings “skepticism” on his own. Greer recently wrote that a fake flag planting ceremony was filmed on Earth, in case it was needed. Also, Brian talked to moonwalking astronauts about their experiences, and received strange replies. Brian got Buzz Aldrin a job and shared an office with him, and Brian was, along with Ed Mitchell, the highest-profile supporter of Greer’s efforts, back in the 1990s. After returning from the Moon, Buzz was institutionalized for a time. Buzz was so rudderless after he left NASA that he tried selling cars, before Brian got Buzz a job at SAIC.

Greer has also stated that the Apollo 11 mission encountered aliens on the Moon, and that Armstrong and Aldrin were threatened into silence. Mitchell flat-out refused to discuss his moonwalking experiences, and had to go into therapy to process them. So, discussing the Moon landings with Buzz and Ed were probably strange experiences, and further led to Brian’s doubts, although they were more along the lines of faked footage rather than the idea that the astronauts never landed on the Moon.

I could write a lot more about those articles, but that may be enough for now.

Best,

Wade

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Hi:

In recent days, I have paid a little more attention to the presentations on Gates and what I call “Justice, American-style,” on how dirty the medical racket plays. All that it does for me is reinforce the idea that the mainstream media and medical authorities are not to be trusted. I witnessed the media’s deliberate lies nearly since the day I met Dennis, and I witnessed decades of lies about him. But Noam and Ed have been smeared for more than 40 years, and so has Howard.

I’ll repeat what I have stated for many years, and I learned it during my first stint with Dennis, in spades: the vast majority of these kinds of situations are not really “conspiratorial,” in the sense of the “bad actors’” being in on it. Very few really are. One provocateur and a hundred of the naïve, low-integrity, and easily manipulated get the job done just fine, and even provocateurs only have a vague understanding of whose interests they serve, but they don’t care, as long as they are handsomely compensated. If they are selling their souls, they make sure that they get a good price for it, or so they imagine, but the Creator’s justice is perfect. Nobody really gets away with anything.

When free energy newbies get involved, they almost always completely misunderstand the risks, as they run out to proselytize to their social circles. Their biggest risk comes from their social circles, not organized suppression. You have to survive the low-integrity behaviors of those around you, and survive more local organized suppression activities, long before you ever come onto the GCs’ radar. The vast majority of hit men and women who were sicced on Dennis over the years really had little idea of the depth of the evil that they were part of, similar to my close relative who was a CIA contract agent. It took 16 years and his career’s greatest success before Ralph began figuring out what the CIA was really all about, and he nearly did not survive his awakening experience, just like Dennis nearly did not survive his. Even for the vanishingly few who finally wake up, it usually takes some kind of traumatic experience, when their faces get rubbed in the evil of our system, and they can deny it no longer, to get there. If I think about it, my awakening began when I was 12, when my family went “health nut,” and it was a gradual series of events, although some were dramatic, until that life-changing day on the witness stand, 18 years later, and I resisted my journey’s primary lesson every step of the way, until it was beaten into my head in no uncertain terms.

Unless people were psychopaths, and they had a pretty idea going in what the real game was, the participants eventually realized, to some degree, how fundamentally evil the CIA was, and Langley is full of zombies, trapped, who shuffle through the halls, going through the motions, drinking themselves into a stupor each night, and counting their days to retirement.

IMO, the conspiracism that is running rampant today on the fringes is not very helpful. Bill Gates is far from a saint, but I also doubt that he really understands how deep the evil goes that he is ultimately playing the front man for. He is just playing the standard game of how ruthless capitalists become “philanthropists.” That charade is literally as old as civilization, and even before, when “Big Men” jockeyed for dominance before the rise of civilization.

I am about halfway through Odum’s masterpiece, and it will definitely have its impact on my essay update. There is not much new to me in it, fact-wise, but I find many of his concepts to be fascinating and very useful in understanding the energy issue. He stated many concepts a little more scientifically than I have so far, and I look forward to incorporating those ideas into my work. For instance, I have stated the structural constraints of each Epoch many times, and how energy ceilings and thresholds essentially defined what the human journey would be like in each Epoch. Odum goes into depth on those issues. Third Epoch civilizations were never going to build hay-powered rockets to the Moon, nor would hunter-gatherers ever build cities. Industrialization, based on tapping new energy sources, and fossil fuels in particular, made achievements feasible that were literally unimaginable to agrarian societies.

While industrial civilization is at its current energy-use levels, primarily based on fossil fuels, the Bill Gateses and Donald Trumps will dominate the retail scenery, while the people who really run the show pull their strings from the shadows. Only the arrival of the Fifth Epoch will change that. It will make all elites obsolete, and it is 100% dependent on the energy issue: everything else is noise, and all of this pandemic panic, conspiracism, and activism that I see today is hacking at branches, at best. Only the destruction of capitalism will end the medical racket, and all rackets. Exposing and resisting the medical racket is not going to help manifest the Fifth Epoch. Only free energy can do that.

That said, sitting at home for the past several weeks is no fun, I know that today’s Western medical paradigm will crumble not only when free energy makes its appearance, but also when “miraculous” medical technologies finally come into the open, but the leverage point is the energy issue, not challenging the germ theory of disease, vaccination, and the rest. Who can keep their eye on the ball and refuse to be distracted by the circus?

Best,

Wade

P.S. Thanks Bill and crew! When attachments work again, some pic posts are coming.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Tuesday was the first day that I could legally hike since March. May is the fairy tale time of year at my favorite local mountain. I caught the last violets of the season, the trillium season is ending, and the mountain is so lush that I was looking for leprechauns. I only saw a few people, and I got a thunderstorm while I was hiking. No worries when hiking the forest like that, low on the mountain. It was all magical.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Living with what I know is not easy, in several ways. I know full well that free energy, antigravity, and a whole host of technologies are on the planet today and have been for a long time. Even before I knew that they existed, I began thinking about free energy’s transformative potential, probably as soon as I heard about Joe Newman, but those days in Boston were when I really began thinking about it. By the time I left Ventura, not only was I radicalized and my life shattered, but I also knew that free energy technology was on the planet but suppressed, in what I now understand is history’s greatest cover-up. It was some years later that I discovered that those technologies were developed to a commercial level long ago.

The past 30 years of study, digesting the work of Noam, Ed, Howard, Ralph, and so on, and resuming my scientific studies, amounted to little more than coming to understand why we don’t have free energy today. Ed and Noam’s Propaganda Model is simply a scholarly explanation of what I discovered the hard way during my adventures.

In 1992, when I contacted Noam, or in 1996, when I first published my website, I really did not understand how difficult it was for people to understand what was obvious to me. The past generation has seen me make varied attempts to help people understand, and I have seen it all. I have watched people go off the deep end, go running out to proselytize, have received thousands of reactions of denial and fear, have been subjected to all manner of attack in cyberspace, and also in my personal life. I carried Brian’s spears after Dennis’s, and even carried Ed’s, and have approached so many people over the years, have been approached by many more, and it is still a relatively small circle that I am in contact with, who “get it” in any kind of breadth and depth. Very few people on Earth even want to understand, which I admit was surprising at first, until I watched people embrace certain death over questioning their indoctrination. When I saved people’s lives, or tried to, and they attacked me as their way of saying “thanks,” those were sobering moments.

For people who even want to understand and seem willing to try, they almost invariably get stuck somewhere on that road from unawareness to knowledge, and I thought that Greer articulated it well long ago. People get stuck in their belief systems and can’t extricate themselves, and what they are stuck on has no relationship to the truth, but seems to be some kind of security blanket, but it is really a leash that keeps their minds and spirits stuck. It took me many years to digest those reactions and what they had in common, relinquish any judgment of it, and I eventually learned that what I have to offer cannot be something to sneak past people’s ego defenses. The people I seek have to be beyond all that, have to be truth-seekers, have to have their hearts in the right place, etc. I eventually learned how rare such people are, but I am a long way from giving up the hunt, and might have 30 more good years in me.

I have had to weather all manner of personal disaster on my journey, and there were years when I was not fit to engage the public. I have to always work on staying grounded, doing the work, hitting the notes that I can, and listening for similar notes. I am here to help people hit the notes, and I am very sympathetic when they can’t. In some ways, I am asking for a lot, but in others, not at all. But I am well aware of the struggle to become aware, even in a small away, of the reality that my fellow travelers and I discovered, usually by risking our lives (usually unwittingly), and also live a normal life, in which we have to make livings, care for our families and friends, and the like. It is no easy dance.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

For the relative few who tried to make a dent in the free energy field, I respected Dennis and Brian above all others, and Mr. Professor sits with them at the head of my pantheon. But we were all human, with our foibles and failings, which comes from the deal of being human. But we all sacrificed our lives to the cause, I am the last man standing, and I am carrying their torches, to a degree.

When I saw Dennis get stuck in religion or “patriotism” or the businessman’s approach, or Brian get stuck, literally, in his codependence with Washington, D.C., or Greer get stuck in his über-warrior approach, I got a sense of how they got there, and all of that tended to stunt their perspectives and approaches, which hurt to see. I banged on the DOE’s doors with Dennis and Brian, but while I was doing it, I wondered what the point was, especially when I did it with Brian. I paid attention when Greer mounted those Congressional hearings in 1997, sent alternative cancer treatment information to his assistant when she got the spook-induced cancer that took her life, and Greer was never the same after that ordeal. I doubt that Greer’s approach to free energy has a prayer (cliché newcomer approaches, IMO), but he has seemed to learn over the years. I have heard plenty of criticism of his efforts, but I have yet to see those critics play on that field.

What I learned from carrying the spears for five mass-movement efforts is that mass movement efforts don’t have a chance of making a dent, as they all seek some kind of lowest-common-denominator to form “group cohesion,” usually by appealing to people’s self-interest, as the pursuit of mutual self-interest is the very definition of politics. When efforts do that, they have sown the seeds of their destruction, and organized suppression probably did not even need to be applied, even though it was in most or all of the attempts that I was involved with. As Brian stated late in his life, only the combined positive intention of focusing on the goal has a chance, and “protest” and other conflict orientations do not have a prayer.

But most of Dennis’s and Brian’s assailants, or the trolls who harry me wherever I appear publicly, were not on somebody’s payroll (but many also were), but were either free-lance criminals or were defending their delusions from the “threat” that free energy presented. Even the least intelligent among us soon realize, at some level, that free energy means the end of the world as they know it, and they are defending their niche of hell on Earth. It took me many years to finally understand that dynamic, after fielding thousands of reactions to the idea of free energy. I was able to write my layers of the free energy onion chart off the top of my head, as I drew on those thousands of responses.

I finally realized that about 99.99% of humanity would not begin to understand until the Fifth Epoch arrived, which is part of the conundrum, and I have never tried to crack the mass movement nut since then. Developing my Epochal framework also made clear to me that those people could not really imagine what I was referring to, other than seeing their world come to an end. I let go of any judgment of the situation long ago, but it also took many years before it began to become clear to me why people just could not wrap their minds around it. Hardly anybody even wants to, and that is the key, above all other issues. Nobody asked humanity if they wanted an Industrial Revolution (or agrarian one), and the Industrial Revolution was more than a century old before anybody realized that it was a revolution. Similarly, I am not asking anybody’s permission to try to help manifest the Fifth Epoch, least of all the GCs. Who put them in charge?

Free energy newcomers nearly invariably think that they can succeed where others had their lives ruined or shortened, with their bright ideas, which have been tried literally thousands of times. They have yet to escape their social conditioning. I know what won’t work, and I know what will, if I can find the people with the qualifications that I think are needed, and are willing to do the work. All that I can do is help shorten their learning curves, help them learn to hit the notes, form a chorus that has yet to be heard on Earth, and we’ll see what the harmonic effects will be (it might be the critical missing piece). Learning these lessons on the high road is life-risking, and I don’t want to be responsible for any more ruined or shortened lives.

My day job is getting busy again (but it beats unemployment! ), so I will be relatively quiet, and plan to keep plunking away on the essay update.

Best,

Wade

[Krishna]

Many months ago we discussed caste in India. A testament to my blindness I knew nothing about Dr. B. R. Ambedkar and his contributions.
Gandhi has fallen a lot in my opinion

What B.R. Ambedkar Wrote to W.E.B. Du Bois

What Congress And Gandhi Have Done To Untouchables by B.R. Ambedkar
The South African Gandhi: Stretcher-Bearer of Empire by Ashwin Desai (Author), Goolam Vahed (Contributor)

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Krishna:

What’s next, telling me that Serra and Teresa don’t deserve sainthood, or that George Washington and Columbus maybe weren’t so heroic, after all? Not long ago, I was reading something on American nationalistic mythology, relating to its classroom history books, and the writer stated that while American history texts in classrooms were fantasies of heroic “Founding Fathers” and the like, from what the author had seen, that dynamic could be seen in every nation’s history textbooks. It is a human universal, concocting some kind of in-group awareness, based on the thinnest set of facts and ignoring mountains of contradictory information that challenged the in-group conceits that are being cultivated in those young minds. As long as humanity lives in scarcity, that dynamic is going to prevail for the vast majority of people.

That said, at least Gandhi was not a mass-murdering thief. I have read that kind of information on Gandhi since the 1970s. Several years ago, Roy published a book on the Gandhi myth. I generally take on the myths of my culture, but that said, since you bring it up, here is my take, and I am not a great Gandhi scholar, as a disclaimer going in.

I actually don’t know of anybody who came to Earth enlightened (although an argument could be made for Yogananda, for instance). For the people I most respected, it was always a process of childhood indoctrination, even becoming imperial troops, to eventually awaken to the lies. That goes for Dennis, Brian, Ralph, Smedley Butler, and on and on, even Howard Zinn, who thought that he was one of the good guys as he bombed the people he was supposedly saving. I was raised in a racist and bigoted household, and did not begin to understand what kind of barn I had been raised in until after I left home. One of the reasons why I became Ed’s biographer was because he alone among lefty scholars with my admiration never advocated violence that I ever saw.

I see the Indian journey this way….

The slamming of the Indian subcontinent into Asia, and the stage was set for that when dinosaurs still ruled, created the Himalayas, which had profound impacts on Earth. I recently read an account that gave “credit” to that event for the global cooling of the past 50 million years, as the eroding Himalayas removed more carbon dioxide than the waning volcanism introduced. I don’t regard the issue as settled, but some do. When the Miocene apes migrated to Eurasia, Southeast Asia became a refuge for what became orangutans, just as it had been a refuge for prosimians when the cooling began 50 million years ago. The Indian subcontinent was a nexus of those migrations, and whales evolved along the Indian coastline as it crashed into Asia.

Fast forward millions of years, and it seems that rice may have been domesticated independently in India, but that is still controversial. Today, not much is known about the Harappan civilization that grew along the Indus (its writing has yet to be deciphered), but it was, like the Egyptian civilization, influenced and likely inspired by Sumer, and like Sumer and Egypt, scientists have discovered that Harappan civilization was stratified, with a pronounced class system. That is a universal among agrarian civilizations, even the pristine ones in today’s Mexico and along the Andes, as well as Mississippian culture. Agrarian societies always had thin energy surpluses, and elites arose to steal their disproportionate share of it, in a dynamic that continues to this day. I have been writing about Bill Gates the philanthropist and vaccination savior a lot lately, which is more of the same.

In that Roy interview, it was mentioned how Gandhi was not much of a feminist. Name a leader of an agrarian civilization that was. The decline of women’s status was a universal with the rise of civilization, wherever it appeared, and only rose again with industrialization, and no need to pick on Gandhi. As Noam has written plenty, India was ahead of England on the modernization curve before England conquered it. One of the greatest crimes in the human journey was the British enslavement of India, which led to nearly two billion premature deaths, which is no news to you, and the British used India to help along its invasion and subjugation of China.

Your post is timely, as you will see in my next post. While I am no great Gandhi scholar, the sense I have is that he was a nationalist whose goal was throwing off the British shackles, not restructuring Indian societies along “enlightened” lines. He did not really make common cause with the lower castes and had a racist bent toward Africans, which was all thoroughly normal and understandable. Gandhi was a nationalist, and represented India’s nascent business class. Noam had a few things to say about Gandhi (1, 2), he was the only political figure that Einstein had any use for, and long ago, I read Orwell’s eulogy on Gandhi and the “clean smell” that he left behind. You could do a lot worse than Gandhi for a national hero, but my work is about ending nations.

The way I see it, India was forcibly kept in its agrarian stage by the British, who turned India into one big plantation, so the persistence of agrarian ways and ideals in India, well into the 20^th century, was normal, and the second-class status of women and low castes that still plagues India is normal and understandable.

India’s caste system was only a variation of the class systems that all agrarian civilizations had, and that there still are de facto caste relations in India I see as little different from the racism and bigotry that still plagues the USA. The Fourth Epoch is not very old. My grandfather lived in a sod hut as a child, only a little more than a century ago, and it was painful to see how my grandparents never shook their agrarian ideals, and I saw those around me who never really shook all of the agrarian conditioning that they were raised with (Dennis’s religious fanaticism, my father’s redneck ways, etc.). So, the mythmaking about Gandhi as a national hero is not surprising, nor is the iconoclasm today, but I would take him over Washington and Columbus, if I had to choose.

Best,

Wade

[Krishna]

Ambedkar understood energy (to some extent) and was not a fan of austerity.
In addition Amartya Sen, said that Ambedkar is "father of my economics"

From What Congress And Gandhi Have Done To Untouchables

Both for society and as well as for the individual there is always a gulf between
merely living and living worthily. In order that one may live worthily One must first
live. The time and energy spent upon mere life, upon gaining of subsistence detracts
from that available for activities, of a distinctively human nature and which go to
make up a life of culture. How then can a life of culture be made possible ? It is not
possible unless there is sufficient leisure. For it is only when there is leisure that a
person is free to devote himself to a life of culture. The problem of all problems
which human society has to face is how to provide leisure to every individual. What
does leisure mean ? Leisure means the lessening of the toil and, effort necessary for
satisfying the physical wants of life. How can leisure be made possible ? Leisure is
quite impossible unless some means are found whereby the toil required for
producing goods necessary to satisfy human needs is lessened. What can lessen
such toil ? Only when machine takes the place of man. There is no other means of
producing leisure. Machinery and modern civilisation are thus indispensable for
emancipating man from leading the life of a brute, and for providing him with leisure
and making a life of culture possible. The man who condemns machinery and
modern civilisation simple does not understand their purpose and the ultimate aim
which human society must strive to achieve.