The Qanon posts, and associated US political analysis

[RunningDeer]

A quick hello there. I just got my electricity and water back on after 7 hot, sticky days. Fortunately, I had purchased a 12" battery operated fan. Priceless investment. And now? Lots of catching up on my internet go-to-places.

I pop into the "Q" thread every now and again. Thank you All for the info.

Tom Montalk of Montalk.net gives his take on the “Q” movement @49:44.

Tom: ”The Q posts, they're not actually that cryptic. They're quite literal. You might see a “D” in brackets which is a “democrat” but it’s not like just like random letters or something.“

Matthew Stephen gives his take of “Q” just before Tom @45:08. I'm almost an hour into the video. It's a good listen.

Summary: COVID agendas, 2020 elections, Q movement, and how it all ties into ET Disclosure and the alien agenda.

Q, Trump, & the Alien Agenda - A Chat with Tom Montalk

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=eEoJibTMg6o

August 9, 2020

❯❯ Matthew Stephen, author of "Free Range Humans: Exposing the Matrix Control System and Awakening the True Self"
https://www.seedsofawareness.com.au

❯❯ Tom / Montalk, author of "Fringe Knowledge for Beginners" and "Discerning Alien Disinformation"
https://montalk.net

♡

[mountain_jim]

Well the 'LARP' is still having US political effects......

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...ight-primaries

"Anti-Semite" Ilhan Omar & "QAnon Believer" Marjorie Taylor Greene Win Tuesday-Night Primaries

< snip >

In other election news, a major upset unfolded in Georgia, where a local business lady who was widely condemned by both Democrats and the establishment Republicans (who supported the neurosurgeon who was running against them) for allegedly believing in conspiracy theories like QAnon has triumphed in her district's GOP primary, giving her an easy path to Congress in an overwhelmingly Republican district.

During her victory speech, Marjorie Taylor Greene delighted in attacking the Democratic establishment, as well as the progressive "squad", and referred to Nancy Pelosi as a "b**ch".

later add

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...523578375?s=20

[edina]

I think the use of the phrase "QAnon Believer" is a tactic, I've only noticed lately.

The better description is a Q researcher. And usually people who research the information coming from the Q posts, don't just research Q. They research in general.

People don't "believe", they research. And then their research informs their thinking.

My congressional district has a Q researcher in the running, too.

She's a fighter!

[mountain_jim]

Exactly right, edina, and for me, related to the Robert Anson Wilson quote I keep in my sig.

I keep researching but I still can't say for sure what the truth of these matters is - I do know that leaders allowing/encouraging cities and citizens to be terrorized by anarchists is not a party/platform I would tend to vote for.

I also admit that for many times in the past I could not find the motivation to vote at all, given likely higher-level controls and manipulations of the voting machines and tabulations.

[edina]

1 Iota - In Pursuit of Truth Presents – 8.12.20

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=GlXxuNithR0

Sir Patrick Mack covers these topics in this episode:

The apparent shooter outside the White House during President’s briefing.
The Chanel Rion question and the look on the camera man’s face.
Re: Reason why Susan Rice was being considered as a VP for Biden.
“Best cover up a lot of the ObamaGate surveillance crimes that had taken place during your campaign”

Snippet of exchange between Levin and Barr. (starting about 5:50)
ML: Why aren’t we indicting …. ?
BB: Rule of Law, only when we believe a crime has been committed and we have proof beyond a reasonable doubt to convict them. And, we have go to a Grand Jury and the Grand Jury has to agree, to get the indictment. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is a high standard. (And goes on to describing how a Grand Jury works.)
Huber
Durham
Jensen
Bash

Media (IC assets) shapes narrative as a way to socially engineer how people “think” about a topic. Using the Clinton impeachment as an analogy. While many people know this, many also don’t know this.
Jeff Sessions cleaning house...

This has also been getting coverage in the recent X22 Reports, too.
Catherine Herridge: Twitter thread at about 12:25
bit of background on Durham
Inside-Outsider, Can the CIA tapes investigation truly by an independent one? Slade 2008
Full throttle, John Durham’s Russia team is stacked with veteran investigators
Mueller: Unmasked by Congressman Louie Gohmert (pdf)


Tunnels below Beruit, labyrinth (“possible”) (understand your own neighborhood, knowing the map, hmmm…)

Baltimore gas explosion this past Monday (Detroit Evergreen)

Catherine Herridge Twitter threads can be found here:
https://threadreaderapp.com/user/CBS_Herridge

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

And yet, they still don't ask THE QUESTION.

And we all know why.

[mountain_jim]

It appears Marjorie Taylor Greene was the 4am MSM talking points feature for today. Not linking to those, but her responses.

Anderson Vanderbilt - I mean Anderson Cooper - also joining in the mockingbird dogpile on top of Marjorie Taylor Greene winning her congressional nomination.

The 4AM points were definitely against Greene this morning.

She's just one candidate. How many stories have we seen leveraged against her in the past 24 hours?

Why is the MSM freaking out so much about her, hmmmm???

Pay no attention to the fact that Cooper was trained at Langley and his mother was a literal Mother of Darkness.

I did not figure out how to extract CNN Anderson Cooper video link from Neon's embed, or locate in quick search, but it's here

https://gab.com/NeonRevolt/posts/104680614370004650


https://twitter.com/mtgreenee/status...109582854?s=20

https://twitter.com/mtgreenee/status...261101568?s=20

https://twitter.com/mtgreenee/status...663518720?s=20

https://twitter.com/mtgreenee/status...355819521?s=20

https://twitter.com/mtgreenee/status...282041350?s=20

[mountain_jim]

Soros weighs in:

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/so...very-dangerous

"We are in a crisis, the worst crisis in my lifetime since the Second World War. I would describe it as a revolutionary moment when the range of possibilities is much greater than in normal times. What is inconceivable in normal times becomes not only possible but actually happens. People are disoriented and scared. They do things that are bad for them and for the world," he told the outlet.

Turning his attention to politics and the pandemic, Soros - who's contributed $52 million towards political spending during the 2020 election cycle, said that the United States is better positioned to weather COVID-19, but President Trump "remains very dangerous" because "he's fighting for his life and he will do anything to stay in power."

"Even in the United States, a confidence trickster like Trump can be elected president and undermine democracy from within," he said, adding "But in the U.S. you have a great tradition of checks and balances and established rules. And above all you have the Constitution. So I am confident that Trump will turn out to be a transitory phenomenon, hopefully ending in November."

In May, Soros claimed that Trump would be a "dictator" without the US Constitution in place, according to Breitbart's Josh Caplan. "But he cannot be one because there is a constitution in the United States that people still respect. And it will prevent him from doing certain things. That does not mean that he will not try, because he is literally fighting for his life," Soros told the Independent.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
Soros weights in:

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/so...very-dangerous

"We are in a crisis, the worst crisis in my lifetime since the Second World War. I would describe it as a revolutionary moment when the range of possibilities is much greater than in normal times. What is inconceivable in normal times becomes not only possible but actually happens. People are disoriented and scared. They do things that are bad for them and for the world," he told the outlet.

Turning his attention to politics and the pandemic, Soros - who's contributed $52 million towards political spending during the 2020 election cycle, said that the United States is better positioned to weather COVID-19, but President Trump "remains very dangerous" because "he's fighting for his life and he will do anything to stay in power."

"Even in the United States, a confidence trickster like Trump can be elected president and undermine democracy from within," he said, adding "But in the U.S. you have a great tradition of checks and balances and established rules. And above all you have the Constitution. So I am confident that Trump will turn out to be a transitory phenomenon, hopefully ending in November."

In May, Soros claimed that Trump would be a "dictator" without the US Constitution in place, according to Breitbart's Josh Caplan. "But he cannot be one because there is a constitution in the United States that people still respect. And it will prevent him from doing certain things. That does not mean that he will not try, because he is literally fighting for his life," Soros told the Independent.

Meanwhile in Brazil...

[Waldo]

What think ye?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=6m5Q_mCK58o

[mountain_jim]

^ search this sub-forum - pretty sure that has been addressed multiple times here and throughout the anon communities, and I don't have time to revisit Austin Steinbart now.

If your efforts can prove things one way or the other let us know.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Steinbart, a complete 100% nutjob shill. He knows nothing, and says nothing but garbage.

[mountain_jim]

I wondered about this possibility - and post 4620 did seem like a current summarization for awhile...

[Ratszinger]

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
I wondered about this possibility - and post 4620 did seem like a current summarization for awhile...

I believe they already did what needed to be done. They gave Trump plausible deniability by creating "Austin Steinbart" who signs off by saying, "WHERE WE GO ONE WE GO ALL" and who claims to be Q. Whether he is or not is irrelevant the fact is he is out there to sort of fall back on as a insurance policy in their own pocket. LIke in Stargate SG1 when Wormhole Xtreme was used as a plausible way of saying all the conspiracy theories came from this. They can lay all of it on Austin at this point and that would succinctly take away focus on not just Trump but all the team in the oval office as well.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by Ratszinger (here)
I believe they already did what needed to be done. They gave Trump plausible deniability by creating "Austin Steinbart" who signs off by saying, "WHERE WE GO ONE WE GO ALL" and who claims to be Q. Whether he is or not is irrelevant the fact is he is out there to sort of fall back on as a insurance policy in their own pocket. LIke in Stargate SG1 when Wormhole Xtreme was used as a plausible way of saying all the conspiracy theories came from this. They can lay all of it on Austin at this point and that would succinctly take away focus on not just Trump but all the team in the oval office as well.

I doubt it. I may have been a bit strong saying he's a nutjob and knows nothing. He has a perspective, and that's fine, but he ain't Q. First and foremost, Q uses no other medium to communicate beyond the chans, and is connected to no other outlet or mouthpiece. Period.

Steinbart's background was pretty much laid bare when he was arrested a few months back and spent some time in custody (Q was posting by the way at the same time Steinbart was in custody). The police also found fake IDs in his house, fake security passes and fake documents that portrayed him as a DIA agent. He isn't and never was (they don't usually have youtube channels).

Certainly he's nothing to do with Trump either, or any official intelligence source. He's a youtube personality trying to cash in on Q - there are many others. He is to Q what Corey Goode is to Bob Lazar.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Now this is the best thing I've seen in a long time. Welcome back old friend..



Would love to see that grey name turn at least purple. You've been sorely missed!

[Chester]

Posted by Star Mariner (here)
Now this is the best thing I've seen in a long time. Welcome back old friend..

Attachment 44075

Would love to see that grey name turn at least purple. You've been sorely missed!

Where do you see that thanks by Paul?

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

On the verge of going mainstream.

And I can see exactly how it's going to go.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by Chester (here)
Where do you see that thanks by Paul?

Not a Thanks, but at bottom of page where users are listed who are currently visiting this thread.

[Chester]

Durham probe: Ex-FBI lawyer to plead guilty in first criminal case arising from review, sources say

Clinesmith was referred for potential prosecution by the Justice Department's inspector general's office

Former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith will plead guilty to making a false statement in the first criminal case arising from U.S. Attorney John Durham's review of the investigation into links between Russia and the 2016 Trump campaign, two sources close to the matter tell Fox News.

Clinesmith was referred for potential prosecution by the Justice Department's inspector general's office, which conducted its own review of the Russia investigation.

Specifically, the inspector general accused Clinesmith, though not by name, of altering an email about former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page to say that he was "not a source" for another government agency. Page has said he was a source for the CIA. The DOJ relied on that assertion as it submitted a third and final renewal application in 2017 to eavesdrop on Page under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

(read the rest by clicking the title)