Covid19: Global reports, news and updates

[greybeard]

Only Sociopaths Reject the New Normal!


Corbett report

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZbZimk0nhjo

[avid]

OMG, where’s my can of bs repellant? That Corbett report is so correct, I am such a sociopath, and that’s proven in my local supermarket if I dare to gasp and remove my mask due to copd stress, the stupidity and ignorance of the media-controlled populace is astounding. I am soon going to ‘disobey’ for health reasons = sociopathic behaviour - aaarrgghh 😡😡😡
I bite my nails, love my germies protecting me, don’t wash my hands every hour, we NEED localised germs to boost our immune system, hence NOT wearing a mask is a positive action. Go mask-free into D3 sunshine as much as possible.

[greybeard]

Bolton sees highest coronavirus infection rate in the country despite local lockdown
Victoria Bell
Yahoo News UK4 September 2020, 1:20 pm BST

https://uk.yahoo.com/news/bolton-see...122032128.html


Bolton now has the highest number of new coronavirus cases in England, despite the region being in a local lockdown since the 31 July.

Some 220 new cases were recorded in the seven days up to 31 August – the equivalent of 76.5 per 100,000 people, up sharply from 17.4 in the seven days to 24 August, according to PA analysis.

A local lockdown was brought in across Greater Manchester on 31 July after rise in cases across the area as a whole.

Public Health England data now shows the borough’s current infection rate is the highest seen since the start of May, prompting questions as to why cases are rising while lockdown measures are in place.

Bolton was put on ‘red alert’ on Monday after the number of new infections spiked.

The government puts any borough in the country on red alert when the rate goes above 50 cases per 100,000 people.


Measures in Bolton and Trafford were due to be eased overnight on Wednesday after a fall in cases earlier in August. But they now “remain under existing restrictions" following "a significant change in the level of infection rates over the last few days" in another U-turn by the government.

Both Bolton and Trafford councils had demanded local lockdowns be kept in place for another week or two "in the interests of public safety".

Chris says
Now this is why I am against the test --The UK Government is using "cases" to keep lockdown continuing.
Recently posted Professor Said the increased testing shows increased positive results--but the tests so sensitive that they show fragments of the virus which has been dealt with by the immune system -- the virus is not complete-- no longer infectious.
he also said that the risk from the virus minimal and the Government should tell people this.
So the Government is using test results that are positive while the tested person/people are not carriers of the virus and perfectly healthy.
I am not in denial that the virus exited and have compassion for those that suffered,
Nor am anti vax -- if its safe and works great.

Im sorry if I seem to be banging a drum on tests but this is being used to keep Draconian measures in place

Chris

[greybeard]

Professor Believes Coronavirus Pandemic Is All Over, Despite Rising 'R' Rate | This Morning

Despite the rising ‘R’ rate reported over the weekend, Professor Carl Heneghan has a particularly optimistic take on the coronavirus pandemic, believing that it’s all over and we must get back to normal. The Professor of Evidence-Based Medicine says we are now seeing so few deaths that in a normal year we wouldn’t even realise there was a virus or disease in circulation - with flu and pneumonia now killing six times more people. He joins us to share his predictions that we’ll see our first day without a single death by early September, and insists that parents must send their kids back to school, without worry.
Broadcast on 24/08/20

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=nHqz-Wk3hus

This information has been coming out for a while and similar posted on Avalon.
Drum beating which is relevant -- we are foot soldiers here at war against the biggest threat to freedom and good health that mankind has seen in many generations.
The virus serious but the Draconian response and lets vaccinate the whole world -- deadly.

Now will the Government take heed I very much doubt it -- this does not suit their agenda --their narrative so full of fear and keeping lockdown in place causing misery to millions, to say nothing of long term ill effects to health through cancelled operations and of course depression through not having a job or a business. Lives ruined.
The so called cure much worse than the disease yet many do not see this.
The Stockholm Syndrome.
Im not a scientist but I did qualify at the highest level in Hypnotherapy N.L.P. and Psychotherapy -- also passed the MENSA on line examination and was asked to sit the "classroom" one. I did not attend that. Did not see myself as an egg head --smiling

Just saying as mention has been made of qualifications.

Chris

Previous statement by the professor goes further.
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/coronaviru...135414823.html

[greybeard]

Dr Rashid Buttar
New Zealand Extreme Control / New Political Party fights back!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=RCX0tiz1lQs

[Baby Steps]

The following from Dr David Martin, in summary states that If the virus is natural you cannot by law patent it - however if its man-made, it is illegal because its a bio-weapon.

Not convinced that THIS virus is patented. What I suspect they do is create the vaccine, patent that, then use this to say that those DNA sequences are their property....

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=RPbgTbQXY9I

Fauci involvement:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=dcysNdqrA6Y

Legal case involved in people creating super-viruses:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZdbE8qv7cvo

[greybeard]

Baby Steps thank you very much for this.
You can patent anything and Im sure I saw that the virus was patented elsewhere.
Its a May be so though.
What ever brilliant videos.
Chris

[samildamach]

https://twitter.com/TheHBwrites/stat...983358467?s=09 in a time of national emergency msm can't chalange the narrative. That's straight from mainstream prime time

[Eric J (Viking)]

Close to erma640+ German doctors speaking out against their governments and WHOs official narrative. Doctors around the world joining their movement. Must watch and share! https://twitter.com/jonkirbysthlm/st...26585621090304

Viking

[Delight]

Not sure where to put this livestream. It is just starting (for me watching) but already touching my sentiment "I feel crazy because it LOOKS SO BAD and it is not the virus"

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=aJ4p0Dbp4Xo

[onawah]

Ohio Governor Calls Out Fauci Lies, Lifts HCQ Ban
By United Medical Freedom Super PAC
August 24, 2020
https://medicalfreedompac.com/ohio-hcq-ban/



( I missed this when it first came out--please pardon if it was posted already-did a search and couldn't find it.)

"Among our most fundamental and sacred rights is the right to medical freedom. But in the curious case of hydroxychloroquine, it seems that the government, media, and pharmaceutical industry have been fighting tooth and nail to make the drug unavailable – despite overwhelming evidence that it can prevent and treat COVID-19.

In Ohio, however, a ban on hydroxychloroquine is being reversed. Thanks to the strong leadership of governor Mike DeWine, the State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy has reversed a rule that would prohibit the sale of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment or prevention of coronavirus.

It could mean the difference between life and death for high-risk patients.

The Hydroxychloroquine Controversy
Starting in August, pharmacies, clinics and other medical institutions were to be prohibited from dispensing or selling the drugs to treat COVID-19, according to regulations issued by the State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy. They could still be used in clinical trials, said Cameron McNamee, director of policy and communications for the board.

Proponents of the ban (which has been instituted in other states across the nation) insist that HCQ is not an effective treatment for COVID-19, citing potential side effects as the reason for the ban. Under the regulation, pharmacists in Ohio found to be selling or dispensing the drug to treat COVID-19 could have faced disciplinary action ranging anywhere from a warning or fine to a temporary suspension of their license.

But Governor DeWine has a unique perspective on the issue. “I agree with the statement from Dr. Steven Hahn, Commissioner of the [Food and Drug Administration], that the decision about prescribing hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 should be between a doctor and a patient,” the governor said in a statement via Twitter. “The Ohio Board of Pharmacy and @ohiomedboard should revisit the issue, listen to the best medical science, and open the process up for comment and testimony from experts.”

And he’s exactly right: medical interventions are a personal decision in which the government has absolutely no business meddling. This is especially encouraging given the extremely political (and at times inexplicable) war that has been fought around the malaria drug. The controversy became mainstream after President Trump announced in May that he was using hydroxychloroquine as a preventative measure to ward off the novel coronavirus.

The Hydroxychloroquine Timeline
Since then, there have been conflicting reports and studies on the efficacy and risk of using HCQ (along with zinc and Zithromax) to prevent or treat COVID-19. On May 7, a study became available in the The New England Journal of Medicine showing COVID-19 patients who were treated with hydroxychloroquine did not experience lower risk of death compared to coronavirus patients who received other treatments.

Later that month, Anthony Fauci discredited the drug in an interview on CNN, saying, “The scientific data is really quite evident now about the lack of efficacy for it.” One day later, research published in The Lancet showed that cancer patients with COVID-19 who received hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin experienced a risk of death 2.89 times greater within 30 days than those who did not receive the drugs.

However, just a few days after the study was released, Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet, tweeted about the validity of the study the medical journal published claiming a higher risk of death for patients who received hydroxychloroquine. “Serious questions have been raised about the reliability of the findings reported in this paper,” he said.

That same day, the Arizona-based Association of American Physicians and Surgeons sued the US Department of Health and Human Services for preventing physicians from prescribing hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 preventative. Two days later, on June 4th, The Lancet retracted the study it published May 22 that claimed hydroxychloroquine was linked to higher mortality rates in COVID-19 patients.

On the same day, The New England Journal of Medicine retracted a separate study showing that blood pressure medications were safe to take for COVID-19 patients. Both studies used data from analytics company Surgispher, which refused to share its raw data with study authors or a third-party auditor after questions about its accuracy arose.

On July 2nd, the International Journal of Infectious Diseases published a study conducted by researchers at Detroit-based Henry Ford Health System that claimed COVID-19 patients who received a small dose of hydroxychloroquine within the first two days of their hospital stay were more likely to survive.

On July 27th, a group of frontline doctors gathered on the steps of the Supreme Court to share their success in treating COVID-19 patients with HCQ. Dr. Stella Immanuel, who currently runs a practice in Houston, says that she has treated over 350 patients with the drug with zero fatalities. Other doctors shared their belief that masks are ineffective and that children are not susceptible and should return to school in the fall.

She cited a study which had recently been published in the American Journal of Emergency Medicine evaluating if hiccups were a symptom of COVID-19. In the study, patients who tested positive for COVID-19 were treated with hydroxychloroquine. The use of HCQ in this study implies its efficacy in treating the disease itself, Immanuel pointed out.

Within hours, the video had been completely deleted or covered with a “fake news” label by virtually every social media platform. Major news outlets scrambled to discredit the doctors, focusing on Dr. Immanuel’s unconventional religious beliefs as proof that her observation must not be true.

(Dr. Immanuel continues to practice as a licenced primary care physician in good standing with the Texas Medical Board, and there is no evidence that her experience in treating patients with hydroxychloroquine is untrue.)

On July 29th, Ohio’s board of pharmacy prohibited pharmacists from dispensing or selling hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19. After a request from Governor DeWine just a day later, the state’s board of pharmacy reversed its ban on hydroxychloroquine for use in COVID-19 patients and said it will reexamine the issue.

Politics vs Medicine
On August 3rd, two Henry Ford Health System executives wrote in an open letter that the persisting political climate has made any objective discussion about hydroxychloroquine “impossible.” The following is an excerpt from that letter:

“The most well-accepted and definitive method to determine the efficacy of a treatment is a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. However, this type of study takes a long time to design, execute and analyze. Therefore, a whole scientific field exists in which scientists examine how a drug is working in the real world to get as best an answer as they can as soon as possible. These types of studies can be done much more rapidly with data that is already available, usually from medical records.

Like all observational research, these studies are very difficult to analyze and can never completely account for the biases inherent in how doctors make different decisions to treat different patients. Furthermore, it is not unusual that results from such studies vary in different populations and at different times, and no one study can ever be considered all by itself.

Our promising Henry Ford treatment study should be considered as another important contribution to the other studies of hydroxychloroquine that describes what the authors found in our patient population. We – along with all doctors and scientists – eagerly support the need for randomized clinical trials.

We also want to point out that scientific debate is a common occurrence with almost every published study. In part, this is what fuels the advancement of knowledge – challenging one another on our assumptions, conclusions and applications to get to a better place for the patients we collectively serve. You can read the original study here and the senior author’s letter to the editor here.

Unfortunately, the political climate that has persisted has made any objective discussion about this drug impossible, and we are deeply saddened by this turn of events. Our goal as scientists has solely been to report validated findings and allow the science to speak for itself, regardless of political considerations. To that end, we have made the heartfelt decision to have no further comment about this outside the medical community – staying focused on our core mission in the interest of our patients, our community, and our commitment to clinical and academic integrity.”

The politicizing of potentially life-saving treatments, along with the overreach of our government in banning or mandating these interventions, is the single greatest issue in American medicine today. This issue is much bigger than the simple question of “does hydroxychloroquine work?”

It’s a matter of fundamental medical freedom and bodily autonomy. Sadly, we are often at the mercy of our leaders in government to protect us from this kind of medical tyranny. Fortunately, there are still some leaders that will answer the call to protect our liberty – even in the face of heavy opposition.

Governor Mike DeWine is one of those heroes. “The Board of Pharmacy and the State Medical Board of Ohio should revisit the issue, listen to the best medical science, and open the process up for comment and testimony from experts,” DeWine said in a prepared statement.

It is IMPERATIVE that we support leaders on either side of the aisle who are willing to stand up for our freedoms and protect doctors who work with patients instead of against them. Please take a moment to join our movement today, and discover how you can affect REAL CHANGE in the fight against medical tyranny."

[onawah]

Close to 1000 German doctors speaking out against their governments and WHOs official narrative. Doctors around the world joining their movement.

[greybeard]

FEAR MONGERING
Coronavirus: fears UK government has lost control as Covid cases soar

I will not paste the "news" on the link.
Its about "cases" not ill people.
Anyone with half a brain will realize if you up the flawed testing you will up the number of "cases"
The test is not fit for purpose and the inventor of it said "Not to be used for diagnosis"


https://uk.yahoo.com/news/coronaviru...195455074.html

[greybeard]

UK Column News - 7th September 2020
A lot of indepth information with screen shots and images.
Covid 19 test kits 2017 mentioned
This may have been debunked.

The video shows Corbyn being forcibly arrested.
He is 74 -- no way to treat a man of that age.
Also people being arrested without masks and as part of the arrest, having a mask forcibly put on them.
A man being handcuffed who has medical exemption--false arrest.
A lot more of interest on the video.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=qgq5NsMqxS8

[greybeard]

Hundreds told to self-isolate after dozens catch coronavirus at charity football game

https://uk.yahoo.com/news/coronaviru...130254407.html

Wont post -- more uses of testing that is used to terrorise and impact on innocent healthy people
Chris

[Richter]

Do Face Masks Work? 8 Peer-Reviewed Studies
September 06, 2020
By Rez Karim

Strange though as it may seem, we feel nervous writing this report. Nervous that Google,
Twitter, Facebook etc. might deem our site ‘less trustworthy’ or something similar. Nervous
because we could very well become victims of internet censorship perpetrated by the Tech
giants like Google et al for touching such a hot button issue with a hint of skepticism. We
feel nervous because we fear imminent attacks by the so-called ‘fact checkers’. Attacks on
our good name because we refuse to tow the establishment line on this subject of acute
public interest.

Indeed, we live in a strange time when open discussions on extremely important public
health issues became taboo. Authoritarian censorship became our New Normal. While
authorities around the world mandate face masks, we remain prohibited from discussing
its pros and cons.

Therefore, in this article we refrain from interjecting any of our own ‘non-expert’ opinions
into this debate. We avoid opposing the so-called experts on mainstream media with any
of our own viewpoints.

Instead, we simply present 8 peer reviewed academic studies on surgical & cloth masks
published on PubMed.gov; and let you the reader draw your own conclusions.

CONTINUE TO STUDIES: https://www.globalresearch.ca/do-fac...tudies/5723124

[Tintin]

This may be carefully managed PR at the same time as providing a salutary warning against the folly of rushing vaccines.

Via Twitter

COVID-19 Last night
Drug maker AstraZeneca pauses COVID-19 vaccine trials for ‘routine’ checks due to ‘potentially unexplained illness’ during tests
The drug giant said it is “routine action” to pause trials whenever there is an unexplained illness among participants. “In large trials, illnesses will happen by chance but must be independently reviewed to check this carefully,” according to AstraZeneca. This comes after nine major pharma companies, including AstraZeneca, signed a petition, committing to not rush the process of developing a vaccine for COVID-19.

And a further related report:

[greybeard]

Recorded at an Imperialism on Trial Event for Julian Assange on the 8th Sept 2020 at St Pancras Church in London.

Former MP Chris Williamson on the state of the Media - 9th Sept 2020

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Voy1FOg8UPE

Journalist Peter Oborne on the state of the Media - 9 Sept 2020

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ozwLMgou_SY

Feel free to shift this
Chris

[greybeard]

Boris Johnson unveils ‘alternative coronavirus plan’ to get some normality by Christmas


https://uk.yahoo.com/news/boris-john...154120783.html

Boris Johnson said the government has worked on an alternative plan to get closer to normality

This will be achieved, Johnson said, through mass testing, with millions processed each day

Office workers could be checked in the morning and work as they did pre-pandemic if negative

If all goes well, the PM said, we could be closer to normality by Christmas

Visit the Yahoo homepage for more stories

Boris Johnson has unveiled an “alternative plan which could allow life to return to closer to normality”, with a hope to get nearer to our old lives by Christmas.

After announcing a ban on more than six people meeting in England, except in certain circumstances, the prime minister said new tests could change how people live.

During his Downing Street press conference on Wednesday, he said the government is aiming to increase its testing capacity to 500,000 a day by the end of October.

“In the near future we want to start using testing to identify people who are negative, who don’t have coronavirus, who are not infectious, so we can allow them to behave in a more normal way in the knowledge they cannot infect anyone else with the virus,” he said.

He added that newer tests which are “simple, quick and scalable” are hoped to become available, which if deployed on a “far bigger scale”, to the magnitude of millions a day, could allow people to lead more normal lives, “without the need for social distancing”.
Scroll back up to restore default view.

This could allow office workers who test negative in the morning being able to work how they did before the pandemic, for example.

A trial with indoor and outdoor audiences will be held in Salford from October, Johnson added, and hopefully then go nationwide.

He said he hoped this project – dubbed “Moonshot” in Whitehall – will become widespread by the spring of 2021 but if “everything comes together” it could be possible to “have life much closer to normal before Christmas”.

However, chief medical officer for England Chris Whitty warned the “period between now and spring is going to be difficult” because people will gather together over winter.

Read more: Boris Johnson warns venues face fines for social distancing breaches

From Monday, the law will change to limit gatherings up to six people in England – the so-called rule of six.

They will be allowed if the total number of people in a household or a support bubble is greater than six, or where the gathering is for work or education.
Chris Whitty warned of a difficult six months. (PA)
Chris Whitty warned of a difficult six months. (PA)

Weddings, funerals and organised team sports are also set to be excluded.

Also announced was a requirement for social venues to take customers’ contact details and retain them for 21 days.

Border Force will “step up enforcement efforts at the border to ensure arrivals are complying with the quarantine rules”, the PM added.

The tightening up has come after coronavirus cases began to spike in the UK, with 2,460 new cases reported on Tuesday, 2,948 on Monday and 2,988 on Sunday.

Health secretary Matt Hancock and Whitty said the rise has been driven by infections in young people.

[greybeard]

Heading Back Into Lockdown – The Puppets Read Their Script – David Icke Dot-Connector Videocast – Please Share To Defeat Censorship

David Icke as usual in good form.
See also
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1377216


https://davidicke.com/2020/09/10/hea...at-censorship/