Covid19: Global reports, news and updates

[DaveToo]

Posted by truthseek (here)
Today from drtrozzi.org:

Dr Astrid Stuckelberger is a PhD in public health with extensive experience working within the World Health Organization. Prior to 2013 her work with the WHO was very constructive. It involved educating and assisting member countries around the world in preparedness for real pandemics and health emergencies.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ANKLLWX0DMQ

This is a great interview and contains lots of really important information!

It should be noted though that it is almost one year old now.

[onawah]

THE LIES OF PFIZER -THE BILLION DOLLAR CASH PAYMENT FROM BIDEN TO MEDIA
March 7, 2022
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/the...iden-to-media/

"A Freedom of Information Act request filed by Del Bigtree and Robert F Kennedy Jr at Children’s Health Defense has revealed that Biden’s Health and Human Services Department paid $1 billion of your tax dollars to bribe all the major news outlets to tell you to get vaccinated.

“HHS revealed that it purchased advertising from major news networks including ABC, CBS, and NBC, as well as cable TV news stations Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC, legacy media publications including the New York Post, the Los Angeles Times, and the Washington Post, digital media companies like BuzzFeed News and Newsmax, and hundreds of local newspapers and TV stations. These outlets were collectively responsible for publishing countless articles and video segments regarding the vaccine that were nearly uniformly positive about the vaccine in terms of both its efficacy and safety.

“Hundreds of news organizations were paid by the federal government to advertise for the vaccines as part of a ‘comprehensive media campaign,’ according to documents TheBlaze obtained from the Department of Health and Human Services. The Biden administration purchased ads on TV, radio, in print, and on social media to build vaccine confidence, timing this effort with the increasing availability of the vaccines. The government also relied on earned media featuring ‘influencers’ from ‘communities hit hard by COVID-19’ and ‘experts’ like White House chief medical adviser Dr Anthony Fauci and other academics to be interviewed and promote vaccination in the news.”

We weren’t supposed to see this information for 75 years. It was the fight of people like Dr Robert Malone and Dr Naomi Wolfe and others that got this disclosed and the two joined Steve Bannon for this episode of the War Room.

Dr Malone tells Steve, “The courts have forced Pfizer and the FDA to comply with the law, which is that after licensure is granted, these documents must be made available. Previously, they’re considered confidential – and remember that, as Naomi’s about to discuss and what the truckers are so upset about: we have been forced to take these vaxxines, and we have been told that they’re totally safe and effective.

“What this documents is the government has been well aware that they are not fully safe and has hidden this information from us. How that really matters for Pfizer is that the indemnification clauses require that Pfizer disclose known adverse events and this documentation demonstrates they didn’t do so. So, a lot of the lawyers are licking their chops over this, because it seems to indicate a break in the veil, that may allow legal action, basically due to fraud and concealment of these risks from the general public.

“This is why you have not been able to have full informed consent, is they’ve hidden all this information from you and they’ve used all the propaganda and censorship tools – which you’re about to cover – and paid media to keep all this information from you and spin it, so that you think the left is right and the down is the up and the Moon is made of green cheese.”

Bannon refers to so some “Pretty big events that are happening early in the week,” the details of which he’s not at liberty to reveal but in which Dr Malone will be involved and which he will be back on the show to discuss."

Posted by onawah (here)
The Lies Of Pfizer; The Billion Dollar Cash Payment From Biden To Media
Episode 1,687 - Bannons War Room
Published March 5, 2022

"We discuss the trucker convoy, Ukraine, the economy, COVID, and more.

Our guests are: Ben Harnwell, Ben Bergquam, Peter Navarro, John Spiropoulos"



Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vtxd49/?pub=ijro7

[Ravenlocke]

So twitter suspended the Vigilant Fox for,
“In the Pfizer trials, more people died in the vaccine group than in the placebo group, and it takes 22,000 vaccines to save one life from covid.
Steve Kirsch:”So you killed 150,000 in order to maybe save 10,000 lives”.

https://gettr.com/post/pyv4po2b61

[Ravenlocke]

The sad part about finding out more and more truth, evidence, is that it makes me more and more sad about my own family members that have gotten vaccinated and I can’t talk to them about it. It’s like waiting for the other shoe to drop and hoping my family will be alright and not get sick. And in perspective there are millions in the same boat and I can only sympathize.
It does however make me kinder, nicer, more understanding but I can’t mention the dangers or harm that they may be in from getting vaccinated. That subject is off limit otherwise I cant keep in touch with them.
Have a very peaceful day Everyone, and cherish every moment as much as you can.

[mountain_jim]

cross-posting

Just after reading this

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...tors-questions

Why Is CDC's Walensky Refusing To Answer this Senator's Questions?
Tyler Durden's Photo
BY TYLER DURDEN
WEDNESDAY, MAR 09, 2022 - 01:00 PM
Authored by Sharyl Attkisson via The Brownstone Institute,

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) has taken a lead throughout the Covid-19 pandemic to hold public health officials and agencies accountable if they’ve failed to provide accurate and timely information to the public for whom they work.

From masks, vaccines, and school shutdowns, to the origination of Covid-19, Johnson has been asking critical questions. However, he says he has received very few answers.

According to Johnson, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Director Rochelle Walensky is one of the public health officials who has been non-compliant with his requests.

To date, Johnson says he has made eight specific requests, directly of Walensky, that have gone unanswered.

In his most recent attempt to get data, he writes:

“In the midst of a pandemic, it is unacceptable that CDC would withhold relevant data on Covid-19 that could inform the public and potentially save lives. Moreover, it is grossly arrogant that your agency has repeatedly ignored Congressional requests.”

* * *

Read Senator Johnson’s latest letter to Director Walensky below:

March 1, 2022

Rochelle P. Walensky, M.D., MPH Director
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Dear Director Walensky:

Over the last year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has failed to be transparent to the American people and their elected representatives. Specifically, CDC has not responded to my multiple requests for information about COVID-19. In addition, CDC has reportedly “withheld information” about COVID-19 from the public that “could help state and local health officials better target their efforts to bring the virus under control.”1 In the midst of a pandemic, it is unacceptable that CDC would withhold relevant data on COVID-19 that could inform the public and potentially save lives. Moreover, it is grossly arrogant that your agency has repeatedly ignored Congressional requests.

To date, I have sent you numerous letters requesting information about COVID-19 including records and data on the virus, school guidance, and the vaccines. For the letters listed below, you have either failed to respond or your response was significantly incomplete:

May 19, 2021 – Requesting records relating to teachers’ unions and CDC guidance.

June 28, 2021 – Requesting information about COVID-19 vaccine adverse events.

July 13, 2021 – Requesting information on vaccine safety monitoring.

July 30, 2021 – Requesting data CDC used to create a slide deck on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness.

August 22, 2021 – Regarding the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting.

September 15, 2021 – Requesting information on the effectiveness of natural immunity as protection from COVID-19.

October 5, 2021 – Requesting information on early treatments for COVID-19.

December 29, 2021 – Requesting information about vaccine lot variation data.1 Apoorva Mandavilli, The C.D.C. isn’t publishing large portions of the Covid data it collects, NY Times, Feb. 21, 2022.

CDC’s failure to respond to Congress appears to be one piece of the agency’s larger problem with public transparency. According to the New York Times, during the “[t]wo full years into the pandemic, the [CDC] has published only a tiny fraction of the data it has collected.”2 The CDC’s apparent indifference toward transparency during a pandemic is disturbing and shameful.

Throughout the pandemic, CDC and other health agencies have promoted inconsistent policies and recommendations regarding COVID-19. Many Americans who voiced concerns about these shifting policies have been subjected to ridicule, vilification, and censorship from the press. Rather than provide the public with complete access to relevant data to justify its COVID- 19 policies, the Biden Administration has apparently favored censorship over transparency.

In my continued effort to ensure that the American people have access to complete and accurate data about COVID-19, I renew my previous requests and call on you to immediately respond to all of my outstanding letters. Additionally, I would like you to brief my staff on whether CDC is withholding data from the public as reported by the New York Times and provide the names and titles of CDC officials who may have withheld the relevant information. I ask that this briefing occur no later than March 15, 2022. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

cc: The Honorable Xavier Becerra Secretary

Department of Health and Human Services

The Honorable Christi Grimm
Inspector General
Department of Health and Human Services

Sincerely,

Ron Johnson
United States Senator

I see this

https://twitter.com/clif_high/status...jvDPeRgMZdYplw

[RunningDeer]

Fainting, seizures and sudden death. The mass “vaccination” program is the REAL pandemic.

COVID VAX MASSACRE (4 min)


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vuc4ol

source

[ClearWater]

Posted by Ravenlocke (here)
The sad part about finding out more and more truth, evidence, is that it makes me more and more sad about my own family members that have gotten vaccinated and I can’t talk to them about it. It’s like waiting for the other shoe to drop and hoping my family will be alright and not get sick. And in perspective there are millions in the same boat and I can only sympathize.
It does however make me kinder, nicer, more understanding but I can’t mention the dangers or harm that they may be in from getting vaccinated. That subject is off limit otherwise I cant keep in touch with them.
Have a very peaceful day Everyone, and cherish every moment as much as you can.

Yes, essentially all the people I care about in this world completely buy into the official narrative. I have tried to point out where the narrative may not make sense or may be contradictory, and they cannot even entertain that possibility (regardless of evidence). I have multiple family members already that have been exhibiting known side effects after being vaccinated, and I don't feel I can even suggest to them that it may be because of the vaccine. And anyway, I don't know that it would be helpful at this point. There would be no joy or pride in being 'right' about this, or having others realize they should have been less trusting. It is sad indeed.

[Ravenlocke]

Destroyer can’t deploy because CO won’t get COVID vaccine, Navy says

An ongoing legal battle over whether the military can force troops to get vaccinated against COVID-19 has left the Navy with a warship they say they can’t deploy because it is commanded by an officer they cannot fire.

https://twitter.com/aginnt/status/1501785290385461251

[Ravenlocke]

https://twitter.com/aginnt/status/1501751410546851840

[Ravenlocke]

https://twitter.com/aginnt/status/1501592090156756993

[shaberon]

Interesting! In the context of Austria:


Feb 5, 2022 — It's official: From Saturday, Austrians over the age of 18 must be vaccinated against Covid-19 or face the possibility of a heavy fine.

13 hours ago — EU's first such rule dropped just a month after it took effect, as minister says it can no longer be justified.

[DaveToo]

Posted by Ravenlocke (here)
Destroyer can’t deploy because CO won’t get COVID vaccine, Navy says

An ongoing legal battle over whether the military can force troops to get vaccinated against COVID-19 has left the Navy with a warship they say they can’t deploy because it is commanded by an officer they cannot fire.

https://twitter.com/aginnt/status/1501785290385461251

Don't you just love it when governments can't get their emergencies straight?
Covid trumps war!

[mountain_jim]

Posted by Ravenlocke (here)
https://twitter.com/aginnt/status/1501751410546851840

Answer: No!

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/u...recommendation

US Airlines Extend Masking Requirements For 1 Month Due To CDC Recommendation

BY TYLER DURDEN
THURSDAY, MAR 10, 2022 - 03:01 PM
Just when frequent flyers were hoping to finally get some relief from the CDC's masking rules, the agency has decided on Thursday to extend the requirements for another month. They are now set to expire on April 18.

< rest at link >

[ExomatrixTV]

• Everything They Want You to Forget 2022:
  

• source

[Hermoor]

And in other news. One way of interpreting the following would be to say that now the foundations of war have been set in the minds of UK citizens, the propagandists are pressing on to ramp up the covid agenda again.

[mountain_jim]

[mountain_jim]

16 seconds of hypocrisy

[ExomatrixTV]

• BOMBSHELL Safety Data Released on “Life Jackets”:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=BgHlteDvIws

[onawah]

Planet Lockdown: A Documentary
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
March 12, 2022
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...rid=1431407609

The filmmakers of Planet Lockdown are allowing a free viewing of this film (for a limited time). CLICK HERE to learn more about their important mission and see how you can help: https://planetlockdownfilm.com/support-the-movie/

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
The film Planet Lockdown explores this unprecedented time in history, speaking with epidemiologists, scientists, doctors and other experts to uncover the real motives behind the increasing totalitarian control taking over the globe
Dr. Scott Jensen, a family doctor and former member of the Minnesota Senate, received an email from the Department of Health that coached him to use COVID-19 as a diagnosis incorrectly
The notion of asymptomatic spread turns virtually anyone you meet or encounter on the street into the enemy or a threat, furthering fear and control
The artificially imposed state of incoherence that’s been enacted during the pandemic is described as a torture tactic, designed to get people to submit to vaccine passports and COVID-19 shots
Many of the experts in the film bring up the Nuremberg Code, which is being violated as people are forced to get experimental shots
Civil disobedience, boycotting businesses that are requiring vaccine passports, participating in rallies and fighting illegal mandates in court are ways that everyone can get involved in protecting freedom

Prior to 2020, if you heard the term "lockdown" you might think of something that happens in a prison — not in a free society. This mechanism of control has since become commonplace — not among prisoners but among the free — with repercussions that are only beginning to be understood.

The film Planet Lockdown explores this unprecedented time in history, speaking with epidemiologists, scientists, doctors and other experts to uncover the real motives behind the increasing totalitarian control taking over the globe. Already banned by Facebook and YouTube,1 the film starts at the beginning of the pandemic, when we were told lockdowns were necessary to "flatten the curve."

This was supposed to be a short-term, 15-day event in the U.S., but the narrative soon changed to ongoing restrictions. As Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug company Pfizer and founder and CEO of the biotech company Ziarco, now owned by Novartis, explained, people have historically quarantined the sick, but quarantining healthy people, as has occurred for the past two years, has no scientific backing or historic precedence.2

"Given this virus represents, at most, a slightly bigger risk to the old and ill than seasonal influenza, and a less risk, a smaller risk, to almost everyone else who's younger and fit," Yeadon says, "it was never necessary for us to have done anything. We didn't need to do anything — lockdowns, masks, testing, vaccines even."3

Questionable Practices Urged for COVID-19 Diagnosis
Dr. Scott Jensen, a family doctor and former member of the Minnesota Senate, received an email from the Department of Health that seemed to be coaching him to use COVID-19 as a diagnosis in situations where he wouldn't have previously used influenza or any other specific viral diagnosis without first testing for it. He said:4

"What struck me right away was I felt like I was being coached to go ahead and use COVID-19 without using the same standards of precision that I would for other things. If I'm going to make a diagnosis, I believe as a physician I have an obligation to use the tools available to me to nail it down with as much certainty as possible.

And it seemed to me that the Department of Health, and the link to this CDC document that said you could diagnose COVID-19 as a cause of death on a death certificate … those two documents, in tandem, went against everything that I had been taught or doing for the last 35 years."

Even Dr. Ngozi Ezike, director of the Illinois Department of Health, is featured in the film stating that even if you died of a clear alternate cause, if you had COVID-19 at the same time, it would still be listed as a COVID death. "Everyone who is listed as a COVID death, doesn't mean that was the cause of the death," she says.5

In January 2020, the PCR test for COVID-19 came out, which allowed health officials to define COVID-19 "cases." If the test was positive, it counted as a case — it didn't matter if you have symptoms or not. Reiner Fuellmich, global fraud attorney, founder of the Corona Investigative Committee, pointed out, "It's never, in the history of mankind, in the history of medicine, there's never been testing of healthy people."6

Yeadon agrees that mass testing of people with no symptoms has no scientific basis. Rather, he says, "It's just a way to frighten people."7 The rising "cases," based on PCR testing, is what built the crisis. But counting cases was only measuring the activity of testing; the more that testing occurred, the more cases that were found.

'Fear Everyone' Became the Message
June 8, 2020, WHO director general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus announced that asymptomatic people could transmit COVID-19. That same day, Maria Van Kerkhove, WHO technical lead for the COVID-19 pandemic, made it very clear that people who have COVID-19 without any symptoms "rarely" transmit the disease to others. In a dramatic about-face, WHO then backtracked on the statement just one day later.8

In the days that followed, media and health officials ramped up fear by claiming that you could be sickened by virtually anyone, even when they appeared to be healthy. "This idea that … you can be ill even though you have no symptoms and you can be a … virus threat to someone else even though you have no symptoms, that's also invented in 2020," Yeadon says.9

Alexandra Henrion-Caude, geneticist, former director of research with the French National Institute of Health, is among those who have noticed something off from the start. "I was very puzzled since the very beginning … I was alert to the fact that what we were living was not quite right."10

She notes that the notion of asymptomatic spread is terrifying because it turns virtually anyone you meet or encounter on the street into the enemy, because they could be exposing you to SARS-CoV-2. "This is actually terrible because it denies the capacity of a person to be a healthy person. Because if asymptomatic [spread] exists, then who is healthy? No one."

What's more, the "proof" of asymptomatic spread is flawed and fraudulent. The New England Journal of Medicine published an article suggesting the transmission of COVID-19 is possible from an asymptomatic carrier in January 2020.11

It was based on a 33-year-old businessman who had met with his business partner from Shanghai, then developed a fever and productive cough. The next evening, he felt better and went back to work January 27.

The writers reported the partner had been "well with no signs or symptoms of infection, but had become ill on her flight back to China, where she tested positive for 2019-nCoV on January 26." From this case study, they theorized the virus could be transmitted from asymptomatic carriers. An important point was left out, which is that the researchers did not speak with the partner from Shanghai before publication.

However, Germany's public health agency, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), did speak with the woman on the phone, and she reported she did have symptoms while in Germany.12 So she was not asymptomatic after all.

In a State of Incoherence, People Crave Normalcy
The pandemic has twisted reality, leaving the public in a mental fog. "You're regularly pledging obedience to things which are not logical," Catherine Austin-Fitts, assistant secretary, Bush Sr. administration and investment adviser with Solari, Inc., says.13 WHO has changed definitions of herd immunity and pandemic, literally altering reality, and this is just one example.

Censorship and campaigns to discredit those who speak out against the narrative are additional control mechanisms that distort the truth. Bishop Schneider of Kazakhstan says the pandemic measures are very similar to Soviet times where he lived, in that there was only one narrative, and if you said there was another meaning, you were declared an enemy.

"When you had another opinion, they said, 'You are a conspiracy group. You have a conspiracy theory. You have hate speech. This expression, hate speech, came from the communists."14 It's psychological manipulation, based on fear, which makes people act totally irrational. The artificially imposed state of incoherence was even described by Austin-Fitts as a torture tactic, designed to get people to submit to vaccine passports and COVID-19 shots:15

"Human beings crave coherence. And so if you can put them in a state of incoherence they will literally do anything they can to get back to coherence. It's a typical torture tactic. 'If you just do what I want, I will allow you to go back to a state of coherence.' So, if you just accept the [vaccine] passports, you'll be free. Or if you get the vaccination, you'll just be free."

Further, by declaring small businesses as "nonessential" during lockdowns, they get shut down, while Amazon, Walmart and other big box stores can take over their market share. A major transfer of wealth occurred away from small family-owned businesses to very large, publicly owned businesses that benefited from the digital economy. In the meantime, Austin-Fitts explains:16

"The people on Main St. have to keep paying off their credit cards or their mortgage, so they're in a debt trap and they're desperate to get cashflow to cover their debts and expenses.

In the meantime, you have the Federal Reserve institute a form of quantitative easing where they're buying corporate bonds, and the guys who are taking up the market share can basically finance — or their banks can — at 0% to 1%, when everyone on Main St. is paying 16% to 17% to their credit cards, without income.

So basically now you've got them over a barrel and you can take away their market share, and generally they can't afford to do what they say because they're too busy trying to find money to feed their kids."

New Control Systems Are Being Engineered
If a few people want to control many, how can you get the sheep into the slaughterhouse without them realizing and resisting? "The perfect thing," Austin-Fitts says, is invisible enemies, like viruses.17 This ramps up fear so the public believes they need the government to protect them. Another effective tactic is "divide and conquer," and the media plays an important role in this, dividing people over shots and masks, for instance.

"What COVID-19 is," Austin-Fitts explains, "is the institution of controls necessary to convert the planet from the democratic process to technocracy. So what we're watching is a change in control and an engineering of new control systems. So think of this as a coup d'état. It's much more like a coup d'état than a virus."18

Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a former public health official and member of German parliament, agrees, stating that pandemic responses have "nothing to do with hygiene. It has to do with criminology."19 The global injection campaign is another form of control, one that's forcing the public to receive experimental shots.

Many of the experts in the film bring up the Nuremberg Code, which spells out a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation. This set of principles was developed to ensure the medical horrors discovered during the Nuremberg trials at the end of World War II would never take place again.

But in the current climate of extreme censorship, people are not being informed about the full risks of the shots — which are only beginning to be uncovered. People are being forced into the shots due to mandates and loss of jobs and personal freedoms, like the ability to travel freely and attend business and social events.

In the End, Truth Will Win
A revolution is occurring, and the experts are hopeful that people will awaken to common sense and resist the totalitarian control that is threatening to take over the globe. Instead, society can be regenerated if people come together and fight back against the encroachment on our liberties.

Civil disobedience, boycotting businesses that are requiring vaccine passports, participating in rallies and fighting illegal mandates in court are ways that everyone can get involved in protecting freedom. "If they want to make us a machine, if they want to make us slaves, we say no," Wodarg says. "… We don't need you anymore, we are many … we don't have to be afraid of any pandemic."20

About the Director

James Patrick
I believe in bringing quality to my readers, which is why I wanted to share some information about the filmmaker, James Patrick, from "Planet Lockdown." Here is a little more about him and what went in to making this film. Thank you James for sharing with us.

What was your inspiration for making this film?

I was in Spain when the lockdowns started, studying a PHD in economics. I escaped to southern France and a week later back to the states. I immediately saw the lockdowns as an economic takedown of the middle class rather than a virus mitigation strategy.

I looked into the academic reference of lockdown as a strategy and they were only mentioned twice and strongly recommended against as the damages would be worse than any benefit.

As an ancestor of Patrick Henry and passionate lover of human liberty, I was so upset by the lockdowns and what they meant for our future, I needed to do something about it. Within a few months I embarked on making a documentary film. The situation developed so quickly I began putting the full interviews out and it became an interview series as well.

I was able to get the best and brightest experts in the world to sit down and tell me their story. It is a high level, intimate look at what happened these last two years, from 2 weeks of lockdown to flatten the curve to Lockouts for the unvaccinated.

What do you hope people take away from the film?

The film takes the viewer on a journey through the whole COVID saga. The film and the full interviews forms an educational body of work that helps the public understand what is going on, how we got here, where are we and where this is headed if we don't put a stop to this. Enough damage has been done. We have to make sure this never happens again or a lot worse things will happen.

Where do the proceeds to your film go?

Proceeds to the project go to cover the expenses of the film and ongoing interview series. These include travel, equipment, and payment for cameramen, sound, edits, audio technicians and web hosting expenses. We have done this project on a shoestring budget and donations are critical to keeping this high quality content coming to earn the public about what is happening and what is to come.

No other film project is addressing the situation from an international perspective, which is required to have a full understanding of what is happening. This is a global operation. We work with colleagues in UK, EU and Africa to capture the situation. We are doing this project as a public service and it isn't free. To date it has been driven by people contributing their time unpaid, myself especially, so donations help covers these out of pocket expenses incurred.

Click the button below to help support the filmmakers.

Donate: https://planetlockdownfilm.com/support-the-movie/

- Sources and References
1 The Washington Post February 10, 2021
2 Planet Lockdown, 8:00
3 Planet Lockdown, 10:37
4 Planet Lockdown, 12:00
5 Planet Lockdown, 13:08
6, 7 Planet Lockdown, 16:48
8 Yahoo June 9, 2020
9 Planet Lockdown, 20:34
10 Planet Lockdown, 3:15
11 New England Journal of Medicine January 30, 2020
12 Science Mag February 3, 2020
13 Planet Lockdown, 4:05
14 Planet Lockdown, 30:00
15 Planet Lockdown, 33:36
16 Planet Lockdown, 41:00
17, 18 Planet Lockdown, 1:10
19 Planet Lockdown, 3:57
20 Planet Lockdown, 1:41

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

• The Shocking Story of the COVID-19 Pandemic as Told by the Experts:

• source

Dr. Michael Yeadon
Dr. Roger Hodkinson
Dr. Peter McCullough
Dr. Robert Malone
Dr. Pierre Kory
Dr. Vladamir ‘Zev’ Zelenko
Catherine Austin Fitts

0:00:10 – Chapter 01: The Experts
0:01:25 – Chapter 02: The Outbreak
0:02:25 – Chapter 03: Lockdowns
0:03:22 – Chapter 04: Masks
0:05:12 – Chapter 05: PCR Testing
0:06:56 – Chapter 06: Asymptomatic Transmission
0:08:15 – Chapter 07: Early Treatment
0:11:46 – Chapter 08: Censorship
0:14:01 – Chapter 09: Operation Warp Speed
0:15:07 – Chapter 10: “Safe and Effective”
0:17:29 – Chapter 11: V.A.E.R.S.
0:19:39 – Chapter 12: Vaccinating Children
0:21:47 – Chapter 13: Myocarditis
0:22:55 – Chapter 14: Blood Clots
0:23:36 – Chapter 15: Vaccinating Pregnant Women
0:26:03 – Chapter 16: Propaganda
0:29:09 – Chapter 17: Vaccine Passports
0:30:22 – Chapter 18: Solutions

• sources:

COVID Revealed – VRevealed.com
Planet Lockdown – PlanetLockdownFilm.com
Stiftung Corona Ausschuss – Corona-Ausschuss.de
Taylor Hudak – TheLastAmericanVagabond.com
The Joe Rogan Experience – JoeRogan.com
USA Watchdog – USAWatchdog.com
Rebel News – RebelNews.com

[Michel Leclerc]

Posted by ClearWater (here)

Posted by Ravenlocke (here)
The sad part about finding out more and more truth, evidence, is that it makes me more and more sad about my own family members that have gotten vaccinated and I can’t talk to them about it. It’s like waiting for the other shoe to drop and hoping my family will be alright and not get sick. And in perspective there are millions in the same boat and I can only sympathize.
It does however make me kinder, nicer, more understanding but I can’t mention the dangers or harm that they may be in from getting vaccinated. That subject is off limit otherwise I cant keep in touch with them.
Have a very peaceful day Everyone, and cherish every moment as much as you can.

Yes, essentially all the people I care about in this world completely buy into the official narrative. I have tried to point out where the narrative may not make sense or may be contradictory, and they cannot even entertain that possibility (regardless of evidence). I have multiple family members already that have been exhibiting known side effects after being vaccinated, and I don't feel I can even suggest to them that it may be because of the vaccine. And anyway, I don't know that it would be helpful at this point. There would be no joy or pride in being 'right' about this, or having others realize they should have been less trusting. It is sad indeed.

Dear Clearwater, I entirely sympathise with you, and with Ravenlocke, being myself in a somewhat similar situation – 9 out of 10 friends, colleagues, neighbours etc. are “vaccinated” and I am worried for them.

However, my worries are somewhat “mitigated” by two considerations:

(1) by allowing the authorities to "vaccinate" them they have increased decisively the creation of a critical mass of "jabbies" which facilitates the enforcement of the "vaccination", whatever form it takes; they are therefore "objective accomplices" of the authorities and thereby constitute a hazard for my own ultimate safety from tyrannical measures;

(2) although objective proof of all possible avenues by which "transmission" of e.g. the Spike protein from a "vaccinated" person to a "vaccine"-clean person has not yet been given, at least a number of available indications suggest the necessity of caution (I have personal experience of "viral assaults" from "vaccinated" persons when encountering them in certain settings (like: a closed room (or a car) for several hours); by this fact alone "vaccinated" people may constitute a hazard for my health.

As if that were not enough, there is also the fact that being accustomed to examining my conscience on a continuous basis, I myself often feel guilty of not having tried enough to withhold people from "vaccination" or to demonstrate publicly my non-consent. In other words, I apply ethical standards to my life which hardly any "vaccinated" persons apply to theirs, and I feel guilt for failing which they do not.

And yet I do not feel much of revolt or revulsion. That is because I happen to live in surroundings blessed by nature, where I can to a large extent avoid "uneasy" encounters.

But sad it is, yes. And sad I am.

A wise man who changed my life once said: "We can not undo the pain we endure but we can put pleasure beside it. We can not undo the sadness we feel but we can put joy next to it. We can not undo confusion in our mind but we can add clarity to it."

Doing this does help me. (And thus, probably, my friends, neighbours...).