Vaccine Crimes

[Delight]

Rumble only accepts one video per post?

DR. SAM BAILEY: PFIZER-INJECTED BLOOD UNDER THE MICROSCOPE

MIRROR SOURCE:
Dr. Sam Bailey: https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/pf...e-microscope:6
Dr Robin Wakeling is back to present round 2 of Pfizer Under The Microscope. 🔬
He's been working with other teams around New Zealand who are attempting to elucidate just what is contained in these jabs.
Exclusively, in this video, he examines the blood of the injected and finds something he has never seen before. The teams have also been examining flu vaccines and have discovered some startling results in these vials...

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vyy1w6

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/SallyMayweather/...dgmiEq4J3Ajxzw

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/ToriaMart/status...Xh5woxMhxg92PQ

[meat suit]

Posted by Delight (here)
Rumble only accepts one video per post?

DR. SAM BAILEY: PFIZER-INJECTED BLOOD UNDER THE MICROSCOPE

MIRROR SOURCE:
Dr. Sam Bailey: https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/pf...e-microscope:6
Dr Robin Wakeling is back to present round 2 of Pfizer Under The Microscope. 🔬
He's been working with other teams around New Zealand who are attempting to elucidate just what is contained in these jabs.
Exclusively, in this video, he examines the blood of the injected and finds something he has never seen before. The teams have also been examining flu vaccines and have discovered some startling results in these vials...

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vyy1w6

this is really excellent, the picture is becoming clearer.
the dismantling of the red blood cells and formation of the remnants into 'spaghetti' that is shown here is quite possibly the cause of the extremely long and sturdy blood clots that the embalmers pull out of the bodies.

[Delight]

FYI

Total World Dominance With "Untouchable" Status: The Active Tasks at Hand to Enslave Humanity

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi: "The first thing that they have to do, of course, is to take away the possessions and the wealth of the individuals. This is what is happening. The second is that they have to reduce the world population, which is happening in front of our eyes. Then there will be enough left for them to lead their own select lives, wherever and however they want. And they will be the untouchables, untouchables because they will have their jets and their islands and all the dominions wherever they want in the world. And we will never be able to reach them because we will be caged as slaves on the rest of the earth... grazing like sheep, like sheep on the field."

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vykw1d

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/HutchElle/status...tRoscWnLxulFyw

[DaveToo]

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
https://twitter.com/HutchElle/status...tRoscWnLxulFyw

"Thirteen media organizations all decided on the same day to reignite hatred for and actively promote avoidance of the unjabbed.

This is coordinated.

This is strategic.

This is political. "


Well in this case, it isn't so shocking.
Almost all of the news reports are originating from Canada (they tend to feed off each other)
since the study came out of Canada.

What is disgusting though is that none of them had the balls to tear apart the study they reported on.

We all know how reliable Neil Ferguson's infamous statistical models were to estimate the number future of COVID-19 cases around the world.

The study that the 13 media organizations are all quoting was also based on computer modeling!

Any competent computer programmer can get a computer to model anything and provide results that support their position.

In this case they are stating that vaccinated people somehow are more likely to become infected by SAR-CoV2 from unvaccinated people than from vaccinated people.

Of course there is no way anyone on this planet could prove this hypothesis in real life (no computer modeling).
So what's the next best thing? Get a computer to spit out this nonsense.

How in the hell do they know that a vaccinated person would be more likely to become infected from a Covid positive unvaccinated person than from a Covid positive vaccinated person?

The computer told them so!

[onawah]

Pfizer can't hide this ANYMORE | Redacted with Natali and Clayton Morris
236,893 views Apr 26, 2022
14K
Redacted
677K subscribers
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...f-a763a07f3392

"In Pfizer's documents to the SEC, there are troubling revelations. The company says that profitability this year could be impacted by the Covid vaccine's safety, efficacy and the medical community. What does this mean? We break it all down.

Judicial Watch today announced it received 466 pages of records from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regarding biodistribution studies and related data for the COVID-19 vaccines that show a key component of the vaccines developed by Pfizer/BioNTech, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), were found outside the injection site, mainly the liver, adrenal glands, spleen and ovaries of test animals, eight to 48 hours after injection.

Pfizer/BioNTech’s mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine relies on LNPs as a delivery system. Pfizer said in a Jan. 10, 2022 press release that Acuitas Therapeutics LNP technology is used in Comirnaty, the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

Judicial Watch also received 663 pages of records from HHS regarding biodistribution studies and related data for COVID-19 vaccines, which show that Johnson & Johnson relied on studies showing that vaccine DNA particles and injected virus particles were still present in test animals months after injection.

The records also show that Johnson & Johnson, as part of its submission to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for approval of its COVID-19 vaccine, did not include studies of the spike protein encoded in the J&J vaccine.

Biodistribution is a method of tracking wherein compounds of interest travel in an experimental animal or human subject.

1 Million Copies Sold — ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’ — The book that launched a movement. BUY TODAY!
Judicial Watch obtained the records in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit — Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, No. 1:21-cv-02418 — filed after the FDA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases failed to respond to a June 8, 2021, FOIA request for:

“[A]ccess to biodistribution studies and related data for the Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson vaccines used to treat and/or prevent SARS-CoV-2 and/or COVID-19.”

The Pfizer records include a report, which was approved in February 2021, on the trials of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in rat subjects.

In a section titled “Safety Pharmacology,” the report notes, “No safety pharmacology studies were conducted with BNT162b2 [the BioNTech vaccine] as they are not considered necessary for the development of vaccines according to the [World Health Organization] WHO guideline (WHO, 2005).”

Similarly, under “Pharmacodynamic Drug Interactions,” is this statement: “Nonclinical studies evaluating pharmacodynamic drug interactions with BNT162b2 were not conducted as they are generally not considered necessary to support development and licensure of vaccine products for infectious diseases (WHO, 2005).”

This Pfizer report notes that when lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) “with a comparable composition,” to that used in the Pfizer COVID vaccine were injected into rats, “Total recovery (% of injected dose) of LNP outside the injection site was greatest in the liver and was much less in the spleen, adrenal glands, and ovaries” … “in summary” … “the LNP distributes to the liver.”

In the detailed analysis, the report states:

“Over 48 hours, the LNP distributed mainly to liver, adrenal glands, spleen and ovaries, with maximum concentrations observed at 8-48 hours post-dose.

“Total recovery (% of injected dose) of LNP, for combined male and female animals, outside of the injection site was greatest in the liver (up to 18%) …”

This same Pfizer/BioNTech study notes, “No genotoxicity studies are planned for BNT162b2 as the components of the vaccine constructs are lipids and RNA and are not expected to have genotoxic potential (WHO, 2005).”

Similarly, the report states, “Carcinogenicity studies with BNT162b2 have not been conducted as the components of the vaccine construct are lipids and RNA and are not expected to have carcinogenic or tumorigenic potential.”

The conclusion of the study begins: “The nonclinical program demonstrates that BNT162b2 is immunogenic in mice, rats, and nonhuman primates, and the toxicity studies support the licensure of this vaccine.”

The report notes that “boost immunizations” were also being tested on the animals in the trial, and that: “Vaccine-related microscopic findings at the end of dosing for BNT162b2 were evident in injection sites and surrounding tissues, in the draining iliac lymph nodes, bone marrow, spleen, and liver.”

Also included in the Pfizer records is a report, approved in January 2021, titled “Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary.”

A table in the report shows the LPNs containing mRNA used in the vaccine using rats as the clinical trial subjects accumulating after 48 hours, especially in the lymph nodes, ovaries, small intestine and spleen.

A summary of a study, approved in November 2020, of LNP mRNA distribution in rats, sponsored by Acuitas Therapeutics, notes that the concentrations of the LNP mRNA saw “levels peaking in the plasma by 1-4 hours post-dose and distribution mainly into liver, adrenal glands, spleen and ovaries over 48 hours.”

Total recovery of radioactivity outside of the injection site was greatest in the liver, with much lower total recovery in spleen, and very little recovery in adrenal glands and ovaries.

The mean plasma, blood and tissue concentrations and tissue distribution patterns were broadly similar between the sexes and … did not associate with red blood cells, according to the study.

A September 2020 “Confidential” appendix to the clinical trial studies submitted for the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID vaccine (BNT162b2), titled “Justification for the absence of studies in CTD Module 4 (part of 2.4),” notes under “Safety Pharmacology” that “No safety pharmacology studies were conducted as they are not considered necessary according to the WHO guideline (WHO, 2005).”

And under “Pharmacodynamic Drug Interactions,” is written: “Nonclinical studies evaluating pharmacodynamic drug interactions were not conducted as they are not generally considered necessary to support development and licensure of vaccine products for infectious diseases (WHO, 2005).”

Under the heading “Genotoxicity,” the appendix states: “No genotoxicity studies are planned for BNT162b2 as the components of the vaccine constructs are lipids and RNA that are not expected to have genotoxic potential (WHO, 2005).”

Regarding “Carcinogenicity (including supportive toxicokinetics evaluations)” the appendix states:

“Carcinogenicity studies with BNT162b2 have not been conducted as the components of the vaccine constructs are lipids and RNA that are not expected to have carcinogenic or tumorigenic potential.

“Carcinogenicity testing is generally not considered necessary to support the development and licensure of vaccine products for infectious diseases (WHO, 2005).”

In a “Confidential” Pfizer study, approved in April 2020, looking at four COVID-19 vaccine variants, the company tested a vaccine with an RNA strand “that self-amplifies upon entering the cell.” It “encodes the Venezuelan equine encephalitis (VEE) virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RDRP or replicase).”

In the same Pfizer study, the authors note, “Although liver function tests will be carefully monitored during the clinical development of these vaccines, BioNTech’s prior clinical experience indicates that the distribution to the liver does not pose a safety concern.”

Also, the Pfizer study authors note, “Based on previous nonclinical and clinical experience with the three RNA platforms, a beneficial safety profile is anticipated, and may include transient local reactions (such as swelling/edema or redness) and body temperature increases.”

The Johnson & Johnson records include a 2007 study of the biodistribution of an intramuscular-administered adenovector-based viral vaccine using New Zealand white rabbits, which showed that the vaccine accumulated in “the spleen, iliac lymph node, and the muscle at the site of injection.”

It's Time to Follow the Science. Join our Campaign!:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/c...w-the-science/

A biodistribution table included as an appendix to the 2007 rabbit study showed that the vaccine DNA particles were still present in the iliac lymph nodes 91 days after injection.

A chart of pharmacokinetics data from a November 2020 report of a study on “VAC31518 JNJ-78436735” (the Johnson & Johnson vaccine) on rabbits shows collection of the injected virus particles in the spleen and iliac lymph nodes up to three months later, as well as particles found in the skin and muscle at the injection site.

In a Nov. 4, 2020, report submitted to the FDA regarding the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine, the authors discuss the 2007 New Zealand rabbit study in which adenovirus-vectored vaccine was trialed. However, they note, “No pharmacokinetic or biodistribution studies have been conducted with AD26.COV2.S specifically.”

The report notes that metabolism, excretion and pharmacokinetic interactions with other drugs were not studied in this trial because they are “not applicable to vaccines.”

The report also noted that “biodistribution studies have not been conducted with Ad26.COV2.S.”

A table in the report shows the vaccine virus continued to appear in the rabbits’ iliac lymph nodes 180 days after injection.

A June 2020 “Pharmacokinetics Written Summary” for the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccines notes that:

“Ad26COVS1 (also known as VAC31518 or JNJ-78436735) is a monovalent, recombinant replication-incompetent adenovirus type 26 (Ad26) vectored vaccine encoding a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Spike protein…. No specific pharmacokinetic studies have been performed with Ad26COVS1.

“However, to assess distribution, persistence, and clearance of the Ad26 vector (platform), biodistribution studies were conducted in rabbits using two other Ad26-based vaccines encoding [redacted] and [redacted] antigens…. [T]he available biodistribution results are considered sufficient to inform on the biodistribution profile of Ad26COVS1, for which the same Ad26 vector backbone is used.”

“These documents show why many Americans have concerns about whether the novel COVID vaccines that were developed at such an accelerated pace were tested properly and thoroughly,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton."

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=U3bXXqUO6eQ

[mountain_jim]

Neither can Moderna (hide it)

SciFi World
Forwarded from
Dr. Lynn Fynn’s Science Enlightenment Channel & Stuff
ffa50947-bd8a-4758-890d-cccbbfee7648.pdf
1.8 MB
Moderna SEC Filing: We May Be Delayed or Prevented From Receiving Full Regulatory approval. Unexpected Safety Issues Could Significantly Damage Our Reputation and That of Our mRNA Platform

https://t.co/nlyzN6pEXS

excerpt from above article link

On February 25, 2022, Moderna released its Annual SEC Filing.

Just like Pfizer in its SEC FIling, Moderna admits that due to safety and efficacy concerns their investigational mRNA Covid - 19 Gene Therapy “Vaccines” may be delayed or prevented from receiving full regulatory approval.
.....


Page 59

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We may be delayed or prevented from receiving full regulatory approval of our COVID-19 vaccine in certain jurisdictions or for certain demographics

Efficacy, effectiveness, safety, and immunogenicity data with respect to our COVID-19 vaccine, as well as real-world evidence, continue to accumulate. Further results from clinical trials, as well as the experience of vaccinated individuals, could show diminished protection compared to the results released to date, as efficacy and antibody persistence wane over time.

Additionally, we may observe new, more frequent or adverse events of greater severity in subjects participating in ongoing clinical trials or among those individuals vaccinated with our COVID-19 vaccine. For example, some studies have suggested that our vaccine may be associated with higher rates of myocarditis and pericarditis in young males compared to other COVID-19 vaccines.

Unexpected safety issues could significantly damage our reputation and that of our mRNA platform, and lead to other issues, including delays in our other programs, the need to re-design our clinical trials and the need for significant additional financial resources.

The assays used to estimate the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines have only recently been developed and continue to evolve. Validation reports for these assays have been submitted for review to regulatory agencies.

Results obtained in clinical studies of mRNA-1273 with later versions of these assays may be less positive than the results we have obtained to date.

The future results in clinical studies of mRNA-1273 may not be as positive when compared to the antibody levels in other blood samples.

We may be unsuccessful in developing future versions of our COVID-19 vaccine to protect against variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, or booster doses of our vaccine may not protect against such variants, and a market for vaccines and boosters against these variants may not develop.

…Additionally, administration of booster doses of our vaccine may prove to be ineffective, or less effective than desired, against certain variants. We have several development candidates against variants of concern, and may develop others in the future. If these efforts are unsuccessful, we are slower to develop variant-specific vaccines than competitors, or these vaccine candidates prove less effective than competitors’ vaccines, these shortcomings may lead to reputational harm, loss of market share, and adverse financial results. (Safe and Effective!)

[mountain_jim]

I love the tone of this message sent to this bill-sponsoring idiot, and appreciate how clueless he must be to share it, given the details contained within it...

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...s-income-taxes

New COVID Bill Fines Parents For Unvaxxed Kids And Doubles Income Taxes

BY TYLER DURDEN
SUNDAY, MAY 01, 2022 - 01:25 PM
An absurd COVID-19 bill by radical leftist Road Island Senator Samuel W. Bell says that residents who refuse the vaccine and its booster shots are subjected to fines and pay more income tax unless they receive an exemption.

Bell introduced Rhode Island Senate Bill S2552 on March 1. As of last week, the bill had not been passed into law is currently in review by the Senate Health and Human Services committee.

S2552 states eligible Rhode Island residents would have to be vaccinated against COVID. If they reject, they could face a $50 monthly fine and pay double the state income tax. There are also fines for unvaccinated children under the age of 16 that would be imposed on the parents. Text from the bill reads:

This act would mandate all residents sixteen (16) years or older to be vaccinated against COVID-19. If a resident is under sixteen (16) years of age, the resident would be required to be immunized against COVID-19, with the responsibility for ensuring compliance falling on all parents or guardians with medical consent powers.

Additionally, any person who violates this chapter would be required to pay a monthly civil penalty of fifty dollars ($50.00) and would owe twice the amount of personal income taxes.

Talking about the bill, Bell told the Boston Globe:

"The reason I introduced the bill is we have a crisis with the pandemic.

"Thousands of Rhode Islanders have died. I've had really painful calls from constituents who can't go to the store because they're immuno-compromised, who have lost loved ones to this pandemic, who are really ill and not fully recovered, suffering long-term effects."

Bell has faced harsh criticism for the introduction of the bill. He tweeted this email he received from one angry Rhode Islander.



Subjecting adults to fines and more taxes for not being vaxxed or even their kids not being vaxxed is a significant overreach by government. Also, the vaccine is not risk-free, especially for children.

Dr. Robert Malone, a virologist and immunologist who has contributed to the technology of mRNA vaccines, recently said: "Think twice before you vaccinate your kids. Because if something bad happens, you can't go back and say, 'whoops, I want a do-over.'"



from ZH commenters

Couldn't have articulated my sentiments any better than that email!
...

WHY are these SATANIC CLOWNS pushing the van so hard???? What is in that POISON

...

the email author is my new hero. you go, dude.

#Fu<kBell

...

That email sums up my thoughts too.

...

I thought that letter from his constituent was rather mild.

...

I think the Rhode Islander, in this article, articulated themself quite well.

...

That stupid cow Birx was on tv this morning pushing her book about COVID. It's supposed to be factual and historical, calm and reasoned, "The Science" - but it's not. It's about as real as Harry Potter and you'd be better off getting The Science from JK Rowling. Birx takes all the hysteria, the uncertainty, the warp speed lies, the Faucian senility and obsolescence, and needle-points a pretty picture out of it for the layman - as if it were all truth and the best we can do. She's learned nothing in two years, understood no report, read no research. She's literally embroidering on the myths of 2020 and trying to pass it off as truth.

Hopefully Mary Poppins Jankowicz will put Birx in jail for misinformation, right?

The point being, the forces of repression have not let go of the pandemic and probably will still be at it fifty years from now, right along with global warming, January 6, and Russia Russia Russia.


..

[shaberon]

Can't you go ahead and try the Senator in Rhode Island for attempted murder?


Let me see if I have this straight. The idea of vaxxing children may or may not have anything to do with the actual substance and consequences of it being inside them. It definitely has to do with a wide berth of legal immunities and future business.

The stage we are witnessing is exactly what we have warned everyone about for a very long time.

[onawah]

What Pfizer, J&J COVID Vaccine Animal Trials Reveal About Shots’ Potential Impact on Major Organs
05/02/22
By Judicial Watch
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...f-a763a07f3392

"Judicial Watch today said documents obtained from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services show lipid nanoparticles from Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine were found in the liver, ovaries and other organs 48 hours after injection, and Johnson & Johnson vaccine particles were present in test animals months after injection.Judicial Watch today announced it received 466 pages of records from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regarding biodistribution studies and related data for the COVID-19 vaccines that show a key component of the vaccines developed by Pfizer/BioNTech, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), were found outside the injection site, mainly the liver, adrenal glands, spleen and ovaries of test animals, eight to 48 hours after injection.

Pfizer/BioNTech’s mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine relies on LNPs as a delivery system. Pfizer said in a Jan. 10, 2022 press release that Acuitas Therapeutics LNP technology is used in Comirnaty, the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

Judicial Watch also received 663 pages of records from HHS regarding biodistribution studies and related data for COVID-19 vaccines, which show that Johnson & Johnson relied on studies showing that vaccine DNA particles and injected virus particles were still present in test animals months after injection.

The records also show that Johnson & Johnson, as part of its submission to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for approval of its COVID-19 vaccine, did not include studies of the spike protein encoded in the J&J vaccine.

Biodistribution is a method of tracking wherein compounds of interest travel in an experimental animal or human subject.Judicial Watch obtained the records in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit — Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, No. 1:21-cv-02418 — filed after the FDA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases failed to respond to a June 8, 2021, FOIA request for:

“[A]ccess to biodistribution studies and related data for the Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson vaccines used to treat and/or prevent SARS-CoV-2 and/or COVID-19.”

The Pfizer records include a report, which was approved in February 2021, on the trials of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in rat subjects.

In a section titled “Safety Pharmacology,” the report notes, “No safety pharmacology studies were conducted with BNT162b2 [the BioNTech vaccine] as they are not considered necessary for the development of vaccines according to the [World Health Organization] WHO guideline (WHO, 2005).”

Similarly, under “Pharmacodynamic Drug Interactions,” is this statement: “Nonclinical studies evaluating pharmacodynamic drug interactions with BNT162b2 were not conducted as they are generally not considered necessary to support development and licensure of vaccine products for infectious diseases (WHO, 2005).”

This Pfizer report notes that when lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) “with a comparable composition,” to that used in the Pfizer COVID vaccine were injected into rats, “Total recovery (% of injected dose) of LNP outside the injection site was greatest in the liver and was much less in the spleen, adrenal glands, and ovaries” … “in summary” … “the LNP distributes to the liver.”

In the detailed analysis, the report states:

“Over 48 hours, the LNP distributed mainly to liver, adrenal glands, spleen and ovaries, with maximum concentrations observed at 8-48 hours post-dose.

“Total recovery (% of injected dose) of LNP, for combined male and female animals, outside of the injection site was greatest in the liver (up to 18%) …”

This same Pfizer/BioNTech study notes, “No genotoxicity studies are planned for BNT162b2 as the components of the vaccine constructs are lipids and RNA and are not expected to have genotoxic potential (WHO, 2005).”

Similarly, the report states, “Carcinogenicity studies with BNT162b2 have not been conducted as the components of the vaccine construct are lipids and RNA and are not expected to have carcinogenic or tumorigenic potential.”

The conclusion of the study begins: “The nonclinical program demonstrates that BNT162b2 is immunogenic in mice, rats, and nonhuman primates, and the toxicity studies support the licensure of this vaccine.”

The report notes that “boost immunizations” were also being tested on the animals in the trial, and that: “Vaccine-related microscopic findings at the end of dosing for BNT162b2 were evident in injection sites and surrounding tissues, in the draining iliac lymph nodes, bone marrow, spleen, and liver.”

Also included in the Pfizer records is a report, approved in January 2021, titled “Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary.”

A table in the report shows the LPNs containing mRNA used in the vaccine using rats as the clinical trial subjects accumulating after 48 hours, especially in the lymph nodes, ovaries, small intestine and spleen.

A summary of a study, approved in November 2020, of LNP mRNA distribution in rats, sponsored by Acuitas Therapeutics, notes that the concentrations of the LNP mRNA saw “levels peaking in the plasma by 1-4 hours post-dose and distribution mainly into liver, adrenal glands, spleen and ovaries over 48 hours.”

Total recovery of radioactivity outside of the injection site was greatest in the liver, with much lower total recovery in spleen, and very little recovery in adrenal glands and ovaries.

The mean plasma, blood and tissue concentrations and tissue distribution patterns were broadly similar between the sexes and … did not associate with red blood cells, according to the study.

A September 2020 “Confidential” appendix to the clinical trial studies submitted for the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID vaccine (BNT162b2), titled “Justification for the absence of studies in CTD Module 4 (part of 2.4),” notes under “Safety Pharmacology” that “No safety pharmacology studies were conducted as they are not considered necessary according to the WHO guideline (WHO, 2005).”

And under “Pharmacodynamic Drug Interactions,” is written: “Nonclinical studies evaluating pharmacodynamic drug interactions were not conducted as they are not generally considered necessary to support development and licensure of vaccine products for infectious diseases (WHO, 2005).”

Under the heading “Genotoxicity,” the appendix states: “No genotoxicity studies are planned for BNT162b2 as the components of the vaccine constructs are lipids and RNA that are not expected to have genotoxic potential (WHO, 2005).”

Regarding “Carcinogenicity (including supportive toxicokinetics evaluations)” the appendix states:

“Carcinogenicity studies with BNT162b2 have not been conducted as the components of the vaccine constructs are lipids and RNA that are not expected to have carcinogenic or tumorigenic potential.

“Carcinogenicity testing is generally not considered necessary to support the development and licensure of vaccine products for infectious diseases (WHO, 2005).”

In a “Confidential” Pfizer study, approved in April 2020, looking at four COVID-19 vaccine variants, the company tested a vaccine with an RNA strand “that self-amplifies upon entering the cell.” It “encodes the Venezuelan equine encephalitis (VEE) virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RDRP or replicase).”

In the same Pfizer study, the authors note, “Although liver function tests will be carefully monitored during the clinical development of these vaccines, BioNTech’s prior clinical experience indicates that the distribution to the liver does not pose a safety concern.”

Also, the Pfizer study authors note, “Based on previous nonclinical and clinical experience with the three RNA platforms, a beneficial safety profile is anticipated, and may include transient local reactions (such as swelling/edema or redness) and body temperature increases.”

The Johnson & Johnson records include a 2007 study of the biodistribution of an intramuscular-administered adenovector-based viral vaccine using New Zealand white rabbits, which showed that the vaccine accumulated in “the spleen, iliac lymph node, and the muscle at the site of injection.”

It's Time to Follow the Science. Join our Campaign!
A biodistribution table included as an appendix to the 2007 rabbit study showed that the vaccine DNA particles were still present in the iliac lymph nodes 91 days after injection.

A chart of pharmacokinetics data from a November 2020 report of a study on “VAC31518 JNJ-78436735” (the Johnson & Johnson vaccine) on rabbits shows collection of the injected virus particles in the spleen and iliac lymph nodes up to three months later, as well as particles found in the skin and muscle at the injection site.

In a Nov. 4, 2020, report submitted to the FDA regarding the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine, the authors discuss the 2007 New Zealand rabbit study in which adenovirus-vectored vaccine was trialed. However, they note, “No pharmacokinetic or biodistribution studies have been conducted with AD26.COV2.S specifically.”

The report notes that metabolism, excretion and pharmacokinetic interactions with other drugs were not studied in this trial because they are “not applicable to vaccines.”

The report also noted that “biodistribution studies have not been conducted with Ad26.COV2.S.”

A table in the report shows the vaccine virus continued to appear in the rabbits’ iliac lymph nodes 180 days after injection.

A June 2020 “Pharmacokinetics Written Summary” for the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccines notes that:

“Ad26COVS1 (also known as VAC31518 or JNJ-78436735) is a monovalent, recombinant replication-incompetent adenovirus type 26 (Ad26) vectored vaccine encoding a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Spike protein…. No specific pharmacokinetic studies have been performed with Ad26COVS1.

“However, to assess distribution, persistence, and clearance of the Ad26 vector (platform), biodistribution studies were conducted in rabbits using two other Ad26-based vaccines encoding [redacted] and [redacted] antigens…. [T]he available biodistribution results are considered sufficient to inform on the biodistribution profile of Ad26COVS1, for which the same Ad26 vector backbone is used.”

“These documents show why many Americans have concerns about whether the novel COVID vaccines that were developed at such an accelerated pace were tested properly and thoroughly,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton."

[onawah]

VAERS Database Hijacked: Vaccine Data Tracker Compromised, Adverse Events Deleted
Published May 3, 2022
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2022/...vents-deleted/

"VAERS is supposed to simply collect reports filled out by doctors and other medical professionals from around the country—reports of people suffering injuries and illnesses and even death after taking vaccines. Nobody is supposed to be editing or curating or fact-checking it. It’s supposed just be the reports of doctors for the entire world to see. But now we have evidence that that’s, in fact, not what’s happening at all.

If you would like to receive an e-mail notice of the most recent articles published in The Vaccine Reaction each week, click here:
https://visitor.r20.constantcontact....KPVPJK5Q%3D%3D

Albert Benavides, COVID-19, MedAlerts, Rumble, Stew Peters Show, The Vaccine Reaction, VAERS "

Also posted here:https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1496755


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v107euu/?pub=ijro7

[onawah]

The Criminal Polio Vaccine Fraud and Covid Vaccines
5/3/22
F. William Engdahl info@williamengdahl.com via aweber.com
file:///C:/Users/onawa/Downloads/Newsletter_No_81_-_The_Criminal_Polio_Vaccine_Fraud_and_Covid_Vaccines.pdf

"The criminal actions of the WHO, Dr. Tony Fauci, Bill Gates and doctors worldwide promoting a dangerous genetic manipulation treatment defined as vaccines, supposedly to prevent covid19, have a sinister parallel in the rollout of dangerous vaccines in the 1950s that are claimed by mainstream medicine and Big Pharma to have “eradicated” polio. In the first decade of the 20th Century, the Rockefeller Institute in New York claimed that its scientists had discovered a “virus” that caused a disease named poliomyelitis. Rockefeller research money excluded any other hypothesis such as environmental factors to focus research on a vaccine. The true story of the dangerous and ineffective Salk and Sabin vaccines in the 1950’s destroys one of the key myths of the entire Big Pharma vaccine business. It has great relevance for what we are being told today about experimental genetic-altering mRNA vaccines allegedly for covid19. This is in part a very personal story as I was diagnosed at age 5 in Minnesota with polio.

The relentless censorship of the Internet and social media by the private corporate social media companies since the 2020 Corona virus, and now the war in Ukraine, is alarming and damaging and can only be compared with book burnings in the Germany of the 1930s, or the Medieval Inquisitions of the Catholic Church with book burnings and torture of heretics.

Gates Vaccine Spreads Polio Across Africa
By F. William Engdahl
28 September 2020

Microsoft founder Bill Gates has made himself the global vaccine czar as his foundation spends billions on spreading new vaccines globally. While much attention has been given to the role of Gates behind the corrupt WHO in promoting radical untested coronavirus vaccines, the record of the Gates Foundation pushing an oral polio vaccine across Africa gives more sobering evidence that all Gates says and does is not genuine human charity. The UN has just recently admitted that new cases of infantile paralysis or polio have resulted in Africa from an oral polio vaccine developed with strong support from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. It mirrors what happened in the USA in the 1950s. This is worth a closer look.

Vaccines that cause polio

The vaccine industry loves to cite development of vaccines in the 1950s as solely responsible for eradicating what was a severe paralytic illness that reached a peak in the USA after World War II and as well, in England, Germany and other European countries. Now, despite the fact that no new cases of “wild polio” virus have been detected in all Africa since 2016, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and their allies in the WHO proclaimed that Gates’ $4 billion ten-year African vaccination campaign using an oral polio vaccine had finally eliminated the dreaded polio. That was at the end of August.

One week later on September 2, WHO was forced to backtrack and admit that new polio outbreaks in Sudan were linked to an ongoing series of new polio cases in Chad and Cameroon. According to the WHO, further polio cases have been registered in more than a dozen African countries including Angola, Congo, Nigeria and Zambia. But the shocking thing is that the outbreaks are all reportedly caused by the Gates- backed oral polio vaccine.

In a revealing comment, a CDC virologist involved with WHO and Gates Foundation in the Africa mass polio vaccination campaign, part of something called the Global Polio Eradication Initiative, admits the vaccine is creating significantly more cases of polio paralysis than the deceptively named “wild polio” disease. “We have now created more new emergences of the virus than we have stopped,” virologist Mark Pallansch of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention admitted. The Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) is a combined effort of the WHO, UNICEF, the U.S. CDC, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Rotary International.

Bill Gates was reportedly responsible for driving the campaign to develop the liquid oral polio vaccine and massively administer it to the populations of Africa and Asia despite the near absence of any cases of “wild polio.” According to one of the partners in the Gates polio initiative, from Rotary International, “Gates personally drove the development of a new polio vaccine that is now in the final stages of testing. When the idea was put forward, about the time of the last case of polio to happen in India, many were thinking the vaccine would play no important role in eradication, but Gates insisted.” When someone asked him, why polio, which had all but vanished worldwide, Gates replied, “Polio is a terrible disease.”

That reply seems curious, as there are far more pervasive deadly diseases out there including malaria or chronic diarrhoea due to unsafe water, and poor sanitation across Africa that causes death by dehydration, poor absorption of nutrients or infectious complications. I would argue that both those are also “terrible.” In 2016 chronic diarrhoea was listed by the WHO as the second leading cause of death in children below five worldwide. In Africa it was cause of almost 653,000 deaths, yet Mr. Gates and friends seem to be interested in other things.

The insistence of Gates on pushing massive vaccination of a new oral polio vaccine his foundation backed at a time polio even in poor countries of Asia and Africa is virtually non-existent, should ring alarm bells loudly. If his goal is to help more African children lead healthy lives, simple water treatment projects would save far more lives. Or is there something in the polio vaccine we are not being told of? Is there aluminum as adjuvant that is documented to be a central nervous system paralytic? Or other toxins?

The Gates Foundation spent almost $ 4 billion to develop and administer the oral polio vaccine throughout the poorest countries in the world as of 2018. This despite that WHO stated that the cases of polio in Pakistan and Afghanistan went from about 350,000 per year to 33 in 2018. There hasn’t been a case in the Americas or Western Europe since before the Gates polio project was launched years ag

Define it away?

Here it gets into some very suspicious linguistic games on the part of WHO, Gates and company. They are trying to cover their deeds by claiming that most of the polio cases are actually something they decided to call acute flaccid paralysis (AFP). That is a debilitating condition with a clinical picture virtually identical to polio. But it keeps the “polio” numbers down. According to the US CDC, there were over 31,500 documented cases of acute flaccid paralysis from just 18 countries in 2017. This is in addition to what they call vaccine-associated polio paralysis (VAPP). Yet from the point of clinical symptoms, vaccine-derived polio, wild polio and acute flaccid paralysis are identical, as is acute flaccid myelitis (AFM), a subtype of AFP. With this proliferation of serious medical-sounding names to describe what produces the same medical symptoms, we have huge ground for manipulation.

A paper written by Neetu Vashishi and Jacob Puliyel published in the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics in 2012 wrote about the Gates-CDC-WHO mass oral polio vaccine effort there: “… while India has been polio-free for a year, there has been a huge increase in non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP). In 2011, there were an extra 47,500 new cases of NPAFP. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received. Though this data was collected within the polio surveillance system, it was not investigated…”

The 1950s

Defining away cases of poliomyelitis or Infantile Paralysis as it was called during the epidemic in the USA after World War II, went back to the 1950s, and to since-suppressed deadly scandals involving the first purported polio vaccine developed by Jonas Salk. Regarded today as a medical hero, the truth of Salk was anything but heroic.

The upsurge in cases of what were then labelled poliomyelitis or infantile paralysis in the United States began to literally explode around 1946. Relevant to note is that a highly dangerous cumulative toxin, a now-banned insecticide known as DDT, was being promoted by the US government as a “safe” control of mosquitoes and flies said to be the “carriers” of polio virus. What has since been all but erased from the government record is the precise match of the number of cases of children with symptoms of acute polio with the degree of acute DDT spraying, and the equally precise mirrored decline of human polio cases from the late 1940s into the 1950s, after a sharp decline in DDT use. In 1953, Connecticut physician, Morton S. Biskind argued in public that, “the most obvious explanation for the polio epidemic: central nervous system diseases… such as polio are actually the physiological and symptomatic manifestations of the ongoing government- and industry-sponsored inundation of the world’s populace with central nervous system poisons.”

The Salk polio vaccine was first deployed in 1955, that is two years after the dramatic decline in registered polio cases. That fact was conveniently forgotten as the narrative was promoted that the new vaccine alone was eradicating the feared polio.

Serious evidence was presented by doctors and others to the US Congress that there was a clear connection between the summer polio epidemics to summer-used heavy metal pesticides such as DDT. They were ignored. The promotion of DDT as a harmless insecticide was so pervasive that kids followed behind trucks spraying the streets and swimming pools were sprayed with DDT, believing it harmless. Highly emotional advertising campaigns proclaimed that deadly polio was mysteriously transmitted by insects and that DDT would protect. Farmers were told to repeatedly spray their dairy cows with DDT to ward of the dangerous insects. DDT thus contaminated the milk supply. Use of DDT exploded by the end of the 1940s across the USA. As one person described it, “Concerned parents went further to protect their children. They feared the invisible virus as if it were hunting their children. They turned their homes into sterile zones by constantly spraying insecticides and washing down the walls with disinfectants.” That sounds familiar.

Salk and Rockefeller

The vaccine research of Jonas Salk as well as of his rival, Albert Sabin, was funded by the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis, later known as the March of Dimes. Salk convinced the US health authorities in 1954 that his polio vaccine contained only inactive virus (IPV), and was absolutely safe. He was able to convince the regulatory authorities that the “expensive and difficult procedures which had been suggested for the detection of possible residual live virus” in his vaccine should be dispensed with. Field trials of the Salk vaccine in 1954 were exposed by the Journal of the American Statistical Association: “…59 per cent of the trial was worthless because of the lack of adequate controls…” That report was ignored by the US Department of Health and the National Foundation proclaimed the Salk vaccine ready to mass distribute in spring of 1955.

Already in 1955 alarming results from the Salk vaccine had emerged. His vaccine, manufactured by Cutter Laboratories, was administered to over four hundred thousand people, mostly school children. Within days, reports of paralysis began surfacing. Within a month, the mass vaccination program against polio had to be suspended. In June of 1956, polio cases began to increase sharply in Chicago in children who had received the Salk vaccine. The National Foundation sent an urgent letter to its members urging them to, “give reassurance that the present Salk vaccine is safe and effective to patients, parents and others in your community who still needlessly doubt it…”

Salk’s vaccine had caused seventy thousand cases of muscle weakness, one hundred and sixty-four cases of severe paralysis and ten deaths. Three fourths of the victims remained permanently paralyzed. Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare stepped down and the director of the NIH, resigned. The Cutter incident was quickly downplayed by the Government and vaccinations resumed after 21 days pause, using vaccines from Wyeth Labs. Those too produced cases of paralysis.

Between 1923 and 1953, before the Salk vaccine’s introduction, the polio death rate in the US had declined on its own by 47 percent; England had observed a similar pattern. Following the use of Salk’s vaccine between 1955 and 1963, cases of polio in the US increased—by 50 percent from 1957 to 1958, and by 80 percent between 1958 and 1959. This was concealed by a US Government change in defining polio, much as the WHO and CDC do today in Africa. Diseases that had previously been grouped together under the umbrella of “polio” began to be reported as separate diseases. One of these was aseptic or viral meningitis, an infectious disease that is difficult to distinguish from poliovirus, or transverse myelitis—a rare spinal cord inflammation, or the Guillain-Barré syndrome. Were all these a result of widespread toxins used in the vaccine? The Government and vaccine industry was not interested in knowing or telling.

Finally in 1963 the US Government replaced Salk’s IPV vaccine with an attenuated oral polio vaccine (OPV) developed by Albert Sabin. As a live virus vaccine, it, too, was and is capable of giving its recipients polio or polio symptoms. Salk testified before a Senate subcommittee in 1977 that the Sabin oral polio vaccine had caused most of the polio cases in the US since the early 1960s.

Rockefeller eugenics?

The National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis, which funded both Salk and his rival Sabin in development of polio vaccines in the 1950’s, was run by two doctors from the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research– Dr. Henry Kumm who had spent 23 years with the Rockefeller Institute, and Dr. Thomas Rivers.

Henry Kumm went over to the National Foundation in 1951 at the peak of the polio epidemic. In May 1953, Kumm became Director of Polio Research at NFIP. Notably, during World War II Kumm had served as civilian consultant to the Surgeon General of the US Army in Italy, directing field studies for the use of DDT against malarial mosquitoes.

Thomas Rivers was from 1922 head of the infectious disease ward at the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, becoming the institute’s director in 1937. As chairman of committees on research and vaccine advisory for the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis, he oversaw the clinical trials of Jonas Salk’s vaccine by Dr Kumm’s group. It could be said that the National Foundation was a mask for a massive Rockefeller polio vaccine project.

Polio researcher David Oshisky stated, “In truth, polio was never the raging epidemic portrayed in the media, not even at its height in the 1940s and 1950s. Ten times as many children would die in accidents in those years, and three times as many would die of cancer. Polio’s special status was due, in large part, to the efforts of the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis, better known as the March of Dimes, which employed the latest techniques in advertising, fund raising and motivational research to turn a horrific but relatively uncommon disease in to the most feared affliction of its time. The genius of the National Polio Foundation lay in its ability to single out polio for special attention, making it seem more ominous than other diseases.” That National Foundation was run by Rockefeller doctors. This is very much what the Gates Foundation is doing with its turbo-charged oral polio vaccine in Africa where polio had almost vanished before the mass vaccine campaign of WHO and Gates.

Here the bond of dedication to eugenics and to dangerous vaccines seems to unite both the Rockefellers and Bill Gates, who in many ways is merely the heir and continuation of the deadly eugenics work of the Rockefellers. All this should give pause before regarding the pronouncements of Bill Gates on coronavirus and his favored vaccines as the scientific good truth."

http://www.williamengdahl.com/
Strasse der Republik 17
Wiesbaden Hessen 65203
GERMANY

[Delight]

I tried to comment under this article but it won’t accept my post. Whether I’ve used unacceptable punctuation or content is unknown. Possibly it’s set to reject posts from a list of names.
Best wishes,
Mike

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us...s-jab-mandate/

There are many comments from wholly unqualified people. Those who just assert things without any supportive evidence to STOP RIGHT NOW. You are actively facilitating the one time destruction of our free society.
Those like me, warning about massive scale deceit through what I’ve called “the covid lies”, have absolutely no personal upside.
I once had a good reputation within the wider biopharma sector. Since 2020, I’ve been dismissed from several advisory boards. I’m smeared daily in main media & the Internet, especially TWITTER.
I dislike publicity & anyone who knows me knows that “seeking money & fame” are definitely wide of the mark.
So I am the most senior commercial R&D scientist who was once in an executive role in Pfizer.
I have formal qualifications in biochemistry, toxicology & pharmacology. My leadership role in global research into infectious & immunological diseases of lung & skin. Those roles required informal qualification in a dozen sub-disciplines related to biology, life sciences used in discovery of new treatments, their clinical development, manufacturing & regulatory filings.
Most important, I HAVE NO CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.
I have the credentials to assess & explain what’s going on.
I’ve been speaking out for two years because something very dark going on.

These “vaccines” are ineffective. They don’t prevent infection. They don’t affect peak viral load (a proxy for infectiousness). Therefore they don’t prevent replication.
They don’t reduce transmission.
The clinical data for both of the mRNA agents are fraud.
For evidence, see Dr Peter Doshi (BMJ), Professor Norman Fenton (U London), Brook Jackson (clinical trials experience); me (30+ years in biopharma R&D, to Vice President at Pfizer, CEO of a successful biotech, consultant to >30 other companies etc.

The ENTIRE narrative & “measures” are all FRAUD:
https://doctors4covidethics.org/the-covid-lies/

These gene-based agents are also very unsafe.
See VAERS.
https://openvaers.com/covid-data/mortality
For extensive evidence see Steve Kitsch, Dr Robert Malone, Dr Peter McCullough, Pierre Kory, Simons Gold.
Please consider sharing.

Piercing the Veil of Indemnification: The Key Is to Prove Scientific Fraud - Dr. Robert Malone

Paths to Proving Fraud

1.) Discrepancies in the batches

2.) The suppression of information (Pfizer Documents)

3.) Insurance actuarial data

"[If anyone can present] a legal theory that meets the criteria for fraud or is sufficiently close to meeting that legal criteria [then] you can force either the FDA, CDC, federal government, or the vaccine manufacturers into court and get them into discovery phase... The belief is that if they're forced into a position of discovery phase, they're going to collapse."

Dr. Robert Malone: Government Corruption and Fraud [VIDEO INTERVIEW – PART 1]
BY VIGILANT FOX
MAY 3, 2022

In this first episode of The Science, David Gornoski sits down with mRNA inventor Dr. Robert W. Malone for a fascinating discussion on the pandemic and how state-designated experts failed to prevent the loss of lives. What needs to be done to ensure that the medical crisis of the pandemic does not happen again? Is there a possibility for institutional accountability for the damages caused? Join Dr. Malone as he takes us through the intricacies of the government health system that made this pandemic crisis possible and more.

Dr. Malone's Substack: https://rwmalonemd.substack.com

Check out Public Health News at https://publichealth.news

Visit A Neighbor's Choice website at https://aneighborschoice.com

Upload via https://rumble.com/c/Vigilantfox

Real News & Commentary for Patriots: https://www.redvoicemedia.com/

Join our Community: https://redvoicemedia.net/community

Get Dr. Vladimir 'Zev' Zelenko M.D.'s Z-Stack Protocol and the NEW Z-DTOX, use code RVM for discount: https://redvoicemedia.net/zstack

Get High Quality Body Armor and Tactical Gear For A Great Price https://redvoicemedia.net/sld

Support Our Efforts To Keep Truth Alive: https://www.redvoicemedia.com/support-red-voice-media/

[Delight]

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/va...finally-proven

COVID-19 Menstrual & Breast Milk Disruptions, Miscarriages, Infertility, Transmission (Shedding)
https://sunfellow.com/covid-19-menst...sion-shedding/

Substack (https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/va...finally-proven)
Vaccine Shedding Finally Proven!
Statistically Significant Vaccine Shedding from Parents to Children

[Matthew]

'Brain Fog'

Covid ‘Vaccine Fog’ and What to Do About It
https://www.theepochtimes.com/covid-...t_4425776.html

...

We were informed that a 15-year-old girl who took one shot of the BioNTech, Pfizer vaccine was experiencing brain fog the next day, and her doctor could not identify the cause of the symptom. The smart and diligent young student received the Covid vaccine dose on Sept. 28, and the next day she felt exhausted, could not concentrate, and nothing seemed to be able to register in her mind.

Two weeks later, on Oct. 11, she went to the library to prepare for an upcoming exam, and it wasn’t long before she went home instead, in tears. She told us that she couldn’t seem to remember anything, all the thoughts were far away, distanced and blocked. She felt like her brain was broken and she was no longer in control of herself. Since then, she even had difficulty smiling and was often depressed.

A neurologist examined her and found nothing wrong with her. The doctor suggested she exercise more and gave her medication (Piracetam) to increase blood flow to the brain. Her symptoms only became worse the next day, after taking the drug, and she had to stop.

She’s far from alone—we’ve received a number of messages from viewers who expressed similar situations after receiving Covid vaccines. All this tells us this is not at all an isolated phenomenon.

In an article in Science magazine about how COVID-19 vaccines are causing long Covid-like symptoms, they write: “the scientific community is uneasy about studying such effects. ‘Everyone is tiptoeing around it.’” Clinicians and researchers don’t want to touch it.

So this week, we turned to Dr. Yuhong Dong, infectious disease and antiviral drug development expert, to talk about adverse reactions caused by the vaccines, why they happened, and how we can help people better recover from these injuries.

...

Because of the lack of complete and transparent data, some are convinced these cases are very rare, and others are convinced these are common, based on the anecdotal experiences from their circles. Such online communities can include many thousands of participants. But numbers aside, we know there are ways to treat brain fog.

...

The article goes on to say recovery needs to include good sleep, a sugar free diet and a positive attitude... the last one not being a feel good factor, it has a physical effect apparently.

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/joehonda7/status...x2fuzuT5nV9Clw

[Delight]

EVIDENCE OF SELF-ASSEMBLING STRUCTURES IN C19 INJECTION VIALS

April 20th, 2022.

This video is my discussion with Shimon Yanowitz who has conducted direct microscopic examination of C19 injections from vials of Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and Janssen. Self assembly of structures is evident. This demonstrates clearly that the products are fraudulent and adulterated. The vials contain undisclosed materials and are very different even within the same manufacturer. We are looking for comments from chemists and biologists who have experience with these types of materials, for example DNA scaffolding and design of DNA based structures.

Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/e9mvTko2Ts0T

[Delight]

this is a good doc for review

CORONAGATE : Big Pharma, Switzerland & Organised Crime
PART 1 OF 2

Richplanet proudly presents the latest film by U.S. film maker Chris Hampton of Wolf Clan Media. The film delves deeply into the companies, individuals and families who have profited from the global pandemic scam. He exposes a complicated web of global power, which leads largely to Switzerland and also to Italian black nobility families. The film features an interview with Iain Davis who was featured on Richplanet show 290.

Lots more food for thought at Rich Planet. Here is one:

Brain Jabbed
PART 1 OF 3


Evidence is mounting by the day, which shows that every make of COVID-19 jab contains graphene oxide and carbon nanotubes. In today's show we present evidence from many independent studies, produced in several different countries, which have carefully examined the contents of the so called vaccines. From this evidence we are confident that the main purpose of recent jabs is not a vaccine. In the show we explain several of the major developments within intra body nano technology, and describe the characteristics of various components that are now in use or have been developed, which could be put inside jabs.

Evidence for the presence of graphene oxide and carbon nanotubes in most of the jabs is very strong.

We cannot say whether nano technologies such as quantum automata, nano antennas or self assembly are present, because the visual evidence that has been suggested by various groups so far, could be explained as salt crystals, however we don't rule out the possibility.

It's important to know about these developments in nano technology, because it is possible to put them inside jabs covertly.

We know that carbon nano tubes can be used for brain modulation, but it is unclear how this could be achieved with the evidence we have seen so far.

More forensic analysis of vaccine vial contents is needed to determine the true function of the jabs.

There is enough evidence here to present to police forces, so that the vaccine centres can be closed down and quarantined, and the perpetrators arrested and sentenced.