The 'Great Reset'

[jaybee]

Posted by Baby Steps (here)
As most of you know, the World Health Assembly has spent the past 7 days considering Biden’s 13 controversial amendments to the International Health Regulations.

Official delegates from wealthy developed nations like Australia, the UK, and the US spoke in strong support of the amendments and urged other states to join them in signing away their countries’ sovereignty.



The first sign, however, that things might not be going the globalists' way, came on Wednesday, the 25th of May, which just happened to also be Africa Day.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

https://www.onenation.org.au/who-for...ating-backdown

You have to wonder just what the hell Western Political Leaders are up to... either they have lost their collective mind or they are deeply infiltrated by NWO type Globalists.... take Boris Johnson for example... he who got into power by strongly supporting BREXIT (Britain's exit from the European Union) - and over and over again used the slogan 'let's take back control' during the Brexit Campaign ...

Now he is a major politician pushing for giving away our sovereignty to the WHO.... so one can only conclude that he is, in fact, a Globalist Mole or is being heavily coerced (or blackmailed) behind the scenes... even though he has turned out to be a Globalist Mole and very enthusiastic warmonger (Ukraine) 'they' still seem to be trying to get rid of him via adverse publicity on the domestic front... I think that must be because there are too many Tory Rebels and the Labour Party is considered by the wanna~be World Dictators as a better bet to do their bidding without question...???

But anyway... this is a good, concise video by David Kurten talking about what's just happened re the WHO vote...

(6.09)

Good news! WHO Pandemic 'Treaty' voted down

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=t90zkAwXIvA

[Matthew]

Posted by jaybee (here)
...Boris Johnson for example... he who got into power by strongly supporting BREXIT (Britain's exit from the European Union) - and over and over again used the slogan 'let's take back control' during the Brexit Campaign ...
...

I think I saw a shift after Boris 'got Covid', similar to Trump. I couldn't see any mention of HCQ post Trumps Covid infection for example. At the time some African world leaders died from Covid. It was disproportionately effecting world leaders

[ExomatrixTV]

• A Terrifying Prediction for 2030 'The Great (Dystopian) Reset'

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=DpE5cBgl11U

The WEF is an organisation that as I've said in a previous video, is groundskeeping our planet. In short, taking massive steps to create our economic, environmental, and financial world in an image they believe is right for all of us. However, what's always concerned me is the fact that the WEF, and its leader Klaus Schwab, aren't elected by anyone. But despite this, they're putting their members, who share their beliefs, in positions of power all around the world. There are some big predictions as to what the Great Reset could bring about by the year 2030. And in this video, I'm going to explore a hypothetical world that could come to pass, if some of the things the WEF have spoken about, or are working towards, become a reality. Let me know your thoughts below. CBDC VIDEO: here

• RESOURCES/SOURCES: abundantia.co/sources-a2030

0:00 - You already know The Great Reset
1:12 - The three pillars of the 2030 agenda
1:58 - Pillar One: Surveillance
5:08 - Pillar Two: Finance
8:16 - FTX insert
9:20 - Pillar Three: Scoring
12:06 - The conclusion
13:50 - Some final thoughts

¤=[Post Update]=¤

• The Bilderberg Group Meets in Washington DC June 2022

[mountain_jim]

not time to post now but great WEF summary from Vigilant Citizen

https://vigilantcitizen.com/vigilant...10-insane-wef/

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitic...omic-forum-wef

The Top 10 Creepiest & Most Dystopian Things Pushed By The World Economic Forum

BY TYLER DURDEN
FRIDAY, JUN 03, 2022 - 11:40 PM
Authored by Vigilant Citizen,

When one talks about the “global elite”, one usually refers to a small group of wealthy and powerful individuals who operate beyond national borders. Through various organizations, these non-elected individuals gather in semi-secrecy to decide policies they want to see applied on a global level.

According to mass media, the Davos meetings gather people to discuss issues such as “inequality, climate change, and international cooperation”. This simplistic description appears to be custom-made to cause the average citizen to yawn in boredom. But topics at the WEF go much further than “inequality”.

Throughout the years, people at the WEF have said some highly disturbing things, none of which garnered proper media attention. In fact, when one pieces together the topics championed by the WEF, an overarching theme emerges: The total control of humanity using media, science, and technology while reshaping democracies to form a global government.

If this sounds like a far-fetched conspiracy theory, keep reading. Here are the 10 most dystopian things that are being pushed by the WEF right now. This list sorted is in no particular order. Because they’re all equally crazy.

< at link >

[ExomatrixTV]

• Top 10 Creepiest Most Dystopian Things Pushed By The World Economic Forum
• The Bilderberg Group Meets in Washington DC June 2022

[ExomatrixTV]

[Matthew]

Everybody was expecting this already, they're so predictable

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/WallStreetSilv/s...05n68VxZUp_OIg

[jaybee]

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
https://twitter.com/WallStreetSilv/s...05n68VxZUp_OIg

that was brilliant...

I think what we have is a new kind of 21st century Class War... but the Mega Rich Ruling Class has craftily (up until now) headed off a confrontation and confused matters by co-opting and absorbing what original Class War was about and smeared themselves with it like a wolf/dog smears itself with the scent of it's prey so it is disguised and can go in for the kill....

The Great Reset Crowd - Schwab et al... the wanna~be World Dictators and slayers of democracy ... flatter and finance and promote individuals .... smear themselves with them to disguise themselves and their true purpose - in their bid for Global Power and complete economic dominance.... so the Class War is muddied - because they now have the Working Class and the Middle Class in the opposite ranks and that's a huge army of people and their only chance is to Mind Control them into compliance and confusion...

'They' are more like Neo Royalty now.... their level of wealth and the power they seek seems more and more like medieval Kings and Queens than that of the Ruling Class of the last 100 years or so.... but they are clever and constantly project the image of caring about the planet and people to fend off serious attack....

[ExomatrixTV]

• Chaos At Schiphol Amsterdam 🇳🇱 and other Airports Directly From Schwab's Book About Great Reset:

Schiphol Airport still suffers from long queues . According to the Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management, the crowds at Schiphol are 'very worrying'. Since Friday, travelers are only allowed to enter the departure halls if their flight departs within four hours. Schiphol also asks passengers to take as little luggage as possible with them.

The crowds at large airports are not only limited to Schiphol. Ben Gurion Airport in Israel is facing serious problems. There are also long lines in Ireland, England and Germany.

Travelers at London's Gatwick and Heathrow airports had to wait hours for their flights last week. TUI has canceled nearly 200 flights to and from Manchester until the end of June. It is expected that the crowds at airports in the United Kingdom will continue for a while.

• Probably has nothing to do with this agenda, right?

The airports of Berlin, Cologne, Düsseldorf, Hamburg and Frankfurt were very busy last weekend. Dublin Airport announced that it is taking additional measures to address long waiting times. A BBC reporter called Birmingham airport 'hell'.

The aim is for most British airports to close by 2029 and flying to be banned altogether by 2050 . “The harassment and sabotage of travelers by Schiphol and KLM probably has nothing to do with this agenda, right?” asks Virus Truth lawyer Jeroen Pols.

• Great Reset

The chaos at the airports is straight from the 2020 book "Covid-19: The Great Reset" by Klaus Schwab, the founder of the World Economic Forum. “Schwab anticipated the infrastructure crisis, but let it happen. That says enough. He thinks it's fine because it suits him," says health scientist Yvonne Simons. “Everything must be broken.”

In his book, Schwab writes that airports face the same challenges as airlines: the fewer people fly, the less often they call at airports. He writes that airports in the post-corona era are faced with longer waiting times , baggage restrictions and distance measures.

• Deterrent effect

This could lead to people having less and less desire to fly, Schwab said. Various industry associations have warned that the measures not only limit airport capacity by 20 to 40 percent, but also make the entire flying experience so unpleasant that they have a deterrent effect, he writes.

“What really matters is the Great Reset and we can't say that because it isn't,” Professor Emeritus Pierre Capel said earlier . Schwab wants us to stay home as much as possible.

• Diversion

People want people to work from home, offices have to go. People want us to only eat at home, eating out has to go. Entertainment is also only allowed at home: concerts and the like, that has to go. Travel should be severely restricted.

“All to eventually link the QR code to all social data, then to banking and to your carbon footprint,” says Capel. “The whole pandemic is a distraction and it is being said in so many words.”

You can find the passage here on page 77.

• source (Dutch 🇳🇱 + Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳

[ExomatrixTV]

• 'Ukraine Must Be A Battering Ram For The Next Step In The Great (Dystopian) Reset'

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Saturday that Western Ukraine should not enter into negotiations with Russia. Lavrov accused the West, led by Britain and the United States, of using Ukraine as a tool to rein in and exhaust Russia.

In an interview, he said the West has banned Ukraine from further negotiations with Russia, which two months ago accepted Ukrainian proposals to serve as the basis for a solution.

backup video

• Reverse

Western countries have forced Ukraine to be tougher on Russia, he said. On the economic sanctions, Lavrov said they are counterproductive and that the West is hurting more than Russia.

Lavrov said his country has previously imported large amounts of agricultural products, turning it into the largest agricultural country in the world. He added that the oil market is not driven by political vagaries.

• "That's Why There Should Be No Peace"

“Ukraine must be the battering ram for the next step in the Great Reset,” responds FVD leader Thierry Baudet. “That's why the West wants war. Therefore there should be no peace. Poor Ukrainians.”

• source (Dutch 🇳🇱 + Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳

[ExomatrixTV]

• Prime Minister Trudeau 🇨🇦 Finances The World Economic Forum With Taxpayers' Money, How Is That In The Netherlands 🇳🇱 ?

The Canadian government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has transferred nearly $3 million in taxpayer money to the World Economic Forum in 2020 and 2021. That writes journalist Cosmin Dzsurdzsa of True North . Trudeau also gave $1.5 billion to the United Nations.

Documents posted to the Canadian government's website reveal that the WEF has received $2,915,095 from Canadian taxpayers over the past two years.

The money was coughed up by two ministries: the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

• Be more accountable

Earlier, World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab boasted that he had "invaded" Trudeau's cabinet and that more than half of his cabinet is made up of members of the WEF.

The director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, Franco Terrazzano, believes the Trudeau government should be more accountable for such spending, especially as Canada faces more than $1 trillion in debt.

"That's a lot of money and we can't keep giving large amounts of money to international organizations because we've been doing that for years," Terrazzano said.
Canadian MP Pierre Poilievre, who will be running for leadership of the Conservative Party of Canada later this year, wants to boycott the WEF.

• More than half a million euros

Artist Erlinde Stephanus wonders : “So Trudeau is financing the WEF with taxpayers' money? How would that be in the Netherlands?”

The Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management transferred more than half a million to the WEF last year. The ministry 's annual report states that the WEF has received a contribution of 325,000 euros 'to strengthen the efforts of the WEF and public-private coalitions with regard to the circular economy and climate for heavy industry, including the cement industry, in the so-called Net Zero Initiative'.

The cabinet transferred another 226,000 euros to the WEF of Schwab 'for their role at the World Circular Economy Forum + Climate (WCEF+) in connecting the private and public sectors, and the circular economy to the climate agenda'.

• 651,000 Euros (699,000 Dollars)
  

In addition , the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate decided in May last year to grant the WEF almost seven tons of subsidy. That is also tax money that flows directly to the WEF.

On March 12, 2021, the WEF requested 651,000 euros for a Global Coordinating Secretariat. A few weeks later, this was promised by the ministry. “The World Economic Forum gets what it wants from our government,” said MP Pepijn van Houwelingen (FVD).

The 1.2 million euros that our government transferred to Schwab in 2021 may be just the tip of the iceberg.

• source (Dutch 🇳🇱 + Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳

[Matthew]

BeeGromit 🐝🐝 🐝
@SammieJack3
Great Reset Creator had no idea that he was filmed with a hidden button camera and boasts about the puppets he has in the Davos Mafia bag: "We have them all in our bags, politicians, media and especially the experts and scientists‼️" Klaus Schwab,

[grapevine]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=68bjj1rfdqM

The tunnel is getting narrower for the world by the day. And as the rest of the world catches on to the reality of the situation, we on the forum have been aware of this for years before The Great Reset video was made (David Icke, Yuri Bezmenov and Aaron Russo, just to mention a few earlier whistleblowers).

I remember a colleague saying to me, years ago, "But what's the point of knowing all this if we can't do anything about it?" and at the time I was shocked and thought she was naïve at best and insane at worst. But maybe she was right as the chipping away of the freedom and opportunities in our lives has been relentless and depressing.

But while it seems that we're stuffed, there have been times in our history where the masses have had little or no rights at all. I'm thinking about Roman times, the Inquisition, Robin Hood and the Crusades, the abject poverty, hunger and disease in Dickensian times, to name just a few. The people in charge have always shown the same disdain for the serfs. This is nothing new. What IS different this time is IT and AI, making us superfluous to requirements. The human being is on the verge of redundancy.

I'm sure there'll be another turnaround this time too but wonder what direction it'll be coming from and when. Forming a Resistance will be impossible with the internet all sewn up and monitored by AI. Revolution wouldn't work either. Maybe the best thing that could happen for us would be a solar flare which takes out all the satellites, or the anticipated pole shift, which would probably be a Mad Max existence for everyone

Failing that, what else is there?

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/WallStreetSilv/s...ByJp9Z4Xg5XcUA

https://twitter.com/WallStreetSilv/s...ByJp9Z4Xg5XcUA

https://twitter.com/Galactic_Trader/...ByJp9Z4Xg5XcUA

[Matthew]

Some cultures eat insects, some cultures eat dogs. Some cultures eat cows although that's worse than eating dogs from some other cultures point of view. I wouldn't like to try and sneak in eating horse meat into English processed foods. This has happened but it was deemed illegal then stopped. That was ten or fifteen years ago though, now it's in fashion to sneak culturally inappropriate food in your mouth. That's my jaded way of looking at it hmpf

[ExomatrixTV]

• Bill Gates And World Economic Forum (WEF) Plotted In 2017 To Capitalize On 'Next Pandemic':

In 2017, the World Economic Forum and the Gates Foundation formed CEPI, or the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations. This is an international alliance that 'promotes, coordinates and finances the research and development of new vaccines against potentially emerging pandemic infectious diseases worldwide'.

CEPI came up with a business plan stating that "the next pandemic is a business opportunity" and that CEPI's response to this business opportunity will be "vaccine development." There was no mention of treatments, internist and epidemiologist Peter McCullough noted in an interview with The Epoch Times newspaper.

“This has been clearly telegraphed from the start,” he said.

• source

"Best investment ever"

In early 2010, Bill Gates said this is "the decade of vaccines." In 2019, Gates called vaccines his "best investment ever." So the focus was on vaccines from the start, McCullough emphasized.
A prick in the arm does little against a sinus infection, said the internist. He pointed out that the flu shot this year, for example, is only 16 percent effective against infection. The pneumococcal vaccine: 9 percent effective against respiratory disease and pneumonia.

• Virtually Nothing

A jab in the arm does virtually nothing for respiratory disease, McCullough said. Then suddenly there were the corona vaccines. They said: they are safe, they are effective and you are going to get them.

• source (Dutch 🇳🇱 + Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳

[mountain_jim]

[ExomatrixTV]

• Dr. Simone Kerseboom: This Is What Awaits Us If We Continue To View The World Economic Forum As ‘Just A Talking Club’

(updated multiple times!)

[ExomatrixTV]

• Scientism, Not Science, Drives Technocracy And Transhumanism

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

> As technocracy and transhumanism have risen to the fore, they have brought with them their own form of science — “scientism” — which is basically the religion of science. In other words, it’s a belief even in the absence of evidence, or in the face of contrary evidence, and this is a very serious problem
> The clearest problem with the admonition to “believe the science” is that bona fide experts are found on all sides of any given empirical question
> The scientific priesthood is intolerant to new ideas while, simultaneously, search engines and digitization of scientific literature have eroded their authority as gatekeepers of knowledge
> The way things look right now, the gatekeepers to the scientific priesthood don’t seem to have any intention to open its doors to outsiders and independent thinkers. If anything, they’re trying to massively increase their control over the information we’re allowed to see and share, even to the point of proposing the creation of certifying boards to police physicians’ sharing of medical opinions
> The idea that a group of people can be the sole arbiters of “truth” is irrational. Individual biases always creep in, and the greater the influence of such a group, the more ingrained and dogmatic those biases will become, until the system is corrupted to the core. One could argue that dogmatic faith in nonexistent scientific consensuses is the reason for why we are where we are today.

Science has long been regarded as a stronghold of logic and reason. Scientists don’t draw conclusions based on emotions, feelings or sheer faith. It’s all about building a body of reproducible evidence. Well, that’s what it used to be, but as technocracy and transhumanism have risen to the fore, it has brought with it its own form of science — “scientism” — which is basically the religion of science. Sheldon Richman with The Libertarian Institute writes:1

“The popular slogan today is ‘Believe in science.’ It’s often used as a weapon against people who reject not science in principle but rather one or another prominent scientific proposition, whether it be about the COVID-19 vaccine, climate change … to mention a few …

The clearest problem with the admonition to ‘believe in science’ is that … well-credentialed scientists — that is, bona fide experts — are found on both (or all) sides of a given empirical question … Moreover, no one, not even scientists, are immune from group-think and confirmation bias …

Apparently, under the believers’ model of science, truth comes down from a secular Mount Sinai (Mount Science?) thanks to a set of anointed scientists, and those declarations are not to be questioned. The dissenters can be ignored because they are outside the elect. How did the elect achieve its exalted station? Often, but not always, it was through the political process …

But that’s not science; it’s religion, or at least it’s the stereotype of religion that the ‘science believers’ oppose in the name of enlightenment. What it yields is dogma and, in effect, accusations of heresy. In real science, no elect and no Mount Science exists.
Real science is a rough-and-tumble process of hypothesizing, public testing, attempted replication, theory formation, dissent and rebuttal, refutation (perhaps), revision (perhaps), and confirmation (perhaps). It’s an unending process, as it obviously must be …

The institutional power to declare matters settled by consensus opens the door to all kinds of mischief that violate the spirit of science and potentially harm the public financially and otherwise.”

Technocracy News also added a comment2 to Richman’s article, noting that “Scientism is at the root of both technocracy and transhumanism, indicating that the revolution waged against the world is religious in nature.”

Whether the war against humanity is truly underpinned by religion or not is open for debate and interpretation. But what is clear is that something has shifted science away from its conventional foundation into something that very much resembles religious faith. In other words, it’s a belief even in the absence of evidence, or in the face of contrary evidence, and this is a very serious problem.

• Scientific Gatekeeping as a "Priesthood"

In “Against Scientific Gatekeeping,”3 published in the May 2022 issue of Reason magazine, Dr. Jeffrey Singer argues that “science should be a profession, not a priesthood.” Indeed, yet that’s basically what it has become. Singer starts out by reviewing the early discovery of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment against COVID-19, and the subsequent demonization of anyone who supported its off-label use.
He then goes on to discuss the scientific priesthood’s intolerance to new ideas while, simultaneously, “search engines and the digitization of scientific literature have forever eroded their authority as gatekeepers of knowledge.” He writes:4

“Most people prefer experts, of course, especially when it comes to health care … But a problem arises when some of those experts exert outsized influence over the opinions of other experts and thereby establish an orthodoxy enforced by a priesthood. If anyone, expert or otherwise, questions the orthodoxy, they commit heresy. The result is groupthink, which undermines the scientific process.

The COVID-19 pandemic provided many examples. Most medical scientists, for instance, uncritically accepted the epidemiological pronouncements of government-affiliated physicians who were not epidemiologists. At the same time, they dismissed epidemiologists as ‘fringe’ when those specialists dared to question the conventional wisdom …

The deference to government-endorsed positions is probably related to funding … President Dwight Eisenhower … warned that ‘we should be alert to the … danger that public policy could itself become captive of a scientific technological elite.’ Today we face both problems …

It is easy to understand why the scientific priesthood views the democratization of health care opinions as a threat to its authority and influence. In response, medical experts typically wave the flag of credentialism: If you don’t have an M.D. or another relevant advanced degree, they suggest, you should shut up and do as you’re told.
But credentials are not always proof of competence, and relying on them can lead to the automatic rejection of valuable insights … Scott Atlas, a former chief of neuroradiology at Stanford Medical School, has published and critically reviewed hundreds of medical research papers. He is a member of the Nominating Committee for the Nobel Prize in Medicine and Physiology.

Yet when Atlas commented on COVID-19 issues, the priesthood and its journalistic entourage derided him because he is ‘not an infectious disease expert’ — as if a 30-year career in academic medicine does not provide enough background to understand and analyze public health data. Why? Because this physician had the temerity to contradict the public health establishment.”

• The Need to Reassess Dogmatic Thinking

Singer reviews several other examples of bonafide experts who got thrown under the proverbial bus by the medical priesthood during the years of COVID, and highlights instances where we can now, rather conclusively, prove that public health officials made bad calls.

Several studies have concluded that lockdowns had no beneficial impact on infection rates and COVID deaths, for example, while disproportionally harming the young and the poor. Yet no one has publicly admitted this strategy was an unwise one that should be permanently abandoned and never repeated.

Many studies have also demonstrated that natural immunity is better than the COVID jab, yet no changes have been made to the official recommendation to inject everyone, whether COVID recovered or not.

“Just as public health officials must abandon a ‘zero COVID’ strategy and accept that the virus will be endemic, the science priesthood must adapt to a world where specialized knowledge has been democratized,” Singer writes.5

“For scientific knowledge to advance, scientists must reach a rapprochement with the uncredentialed. They must not dismiss lay hypotheses or observations out of hand. They must fight against the understandable desire to avoid any hypothesis that might upset the health bureaucrats who control billions of research grant dollars.
It is always useful to challenge and reassess long-held premises and dogmas. People outside of a field might provide valuable perspectives that can be missed by those within it.”

• Effort to Muzzle Doctors Continues

The way things look right now, the gatekeepers to the scientific priesthood don’t seem to have any intention to open its doors to outsiders and independent thinkers.
If anything, they’re trying to massively increase their control over the information we’re allowed to see and share, even to the point of proposing the creation of private medical certifying boards to police physicians’ sharing of medical opinions online and elsewhere. In a May 31, 2022, Substack article, independent medical journalist Paul Thacker writes:6

“This of course, is laughable. We have plenty of evidence that medical boards are incapable of regulating physician behavior simply by looking at the history of drug scandals in America, none of which could have occurred without the complicity of corrupt doctors — few if any of whom were later sanctioned by their own profession.
Anyone notice a medical board going after Duke University’s Dr. Ralph Snyderman for aiding the Sacklers’ opioid scheme and helping spread disinformation that these highly addictive drugs are NOT … highly addictive?

Of course not. Snyderman built up Duke University into the 3rd most prestigious medical school in the States. Despite spreading disinformation about opioids that killed tens of thousands of Americans, he’s obviously a great doctor …

Oddly enough, one of the most prolific tweeters on COVID-19 vaccines is Baylor University’s Dr. Peter Hotez. And while Hotez has spread disinformation about vaccines — in one example, stating that vaccines mandates were never going to happen and were just a dog whistle by anti-vaccine groups — don’t expect any state medical board to come after him.

The reality is that, during the pandemic, the medical profession has become cheerleaders for vaccines, not skeptics. So when a couple MDs write an essay in the NEJM saying we need to confront COVID-19 vaccine misinformation, you automatically know they don’t mean someone like Hotez who has tweeted vaccine misinformation, but who has also religiously promoted COVID-19 vaccines.”

Thacker goes on to detail the history of Dr. Edward Michna, who has spent a large portion of his career promoting and defending the use of opioids for several different drug companies. He’s also conducted several pain trials involving opioids, and despite having received many tens of thousands of dollars from opioid makers, he didn’t disclose those competing interests.

“In coming months, documents will be released, further explaining what the opioid manufacturers did. But nothing … NOTHING will happen to Dr. Edward Michna for defending these companies,” Thacker writes.7 “That’s why nobody should believe … the idea that doctors can regulate doctors. Doctors have had forever to do this, and they continually fail.”

• Without Free Discourse, Science Dies

It seems the moral of all these stories is that without free discourse, science cannot flourish and falsehoods become harder to weed out. Free speech is a requirement for any well-functioning system, whether we’re talking about politics, medicine, science or anything else.

The idea that a group of people, no matter how well-intended, can be the sole arbiters of “truth” is irrational on its face, because who among us can claim to know all there is to know? Individual biases always creep in, and the greater the influence of such a group, the more ingrained and dogmatic those biases will become, until the system is corrupted to the core.

One could argue that dogmatic faith in nonexistent scientific consensuses is the reason for why we are where we are today. Gatekeepers to the scientific priesthood have already allowed science to be corrupted to the point its barely recognizable. The answer, then, is not more of the same, but less. We need less censorship and more open-minded sharing of viewpoints, opinions and interpretations.

And when it comes to creating medical boards to police medical “misinformation” shared by doctors, we already know how that would work out. While Thacker doesn’t mention this, many doctors have been targeted by various professional boards, including state medical boards, for publicly opposing COVID measures such as mask and COVID shot mandates. I discussed this in “Medical Boards Hunting Down Doctors Over Mask Mandates.”

• Transforming the Health Care System

In his book, “Curable: How an Unlikely Group of Radical Innovators Is Trying to Transform Our Health Care System,” Travis Christofferson addresses questions such as: “What has happened to American health care?” and “What are the foundational disruptions or corruptions in the system?”

His book, in some ways, is based on the theory promoted in Michael Lewis’ book and subsequent film, “Moneyball.” It describes how you can use statistics to massively improve a flawed system.

“Moneyball” showed how, within a simple game of baseball, you can have massive inefficiencies, and by taking away the human biases and just applying statistics to find what is undervalued, you can massively boost the performance of a team.

When I interviewed Christofferson about his book, he offered several examples of how statistics and removal of human biases can be used in the same way to improve inefficiencies within the medical system. For example, the diabetic drug metformin has “massive repositories of data” suggesting it can be useful against a plethora of chronic diseases, including cancer, and it’s extremely affordable.

The reason it’s rarely prescribed for any of these other indications is because there’s a financial motivation to capitalize on more expensive treatments, even if they don’t work well. By focusing on undervalued treatments and low-cost prevention, health care costs could be driven way down, while simultaneously improving patient outcomes.
Another example comes from Geisinger Health in Pennsylvania. By introducing a Fresh Food Farmacy for Type 2 diabetics, Geisinger Health was able to reduce its per-year outlays and cost for Type 2 diabetics by a whopping 80%. Patients with prediabetes or Type 2 diabetes are given a prescription for fresh, whole foods, and allowed two free meals a day from the Farmacy, along with intensive care and educational support.
A third example is Intermountain Health. In addition to paying its doctors a fixed salary plus bonuses based on patients’ health outcomes, they also assess differences between treatments to see which works best.

For example, patients are always given antibiotics before surgery, but it’s never been established when the optimal time to administer the drugs is. Intermountain compared medical records, finding the optimal time was two hours before surgery, which cut their surgical infection rate by more than half.

• Bias Corrupts and Corruption Is Inherently Destructive

These are all examples of how we can effectively and efficiently move medicine forward. By silencing debate and discussion, and by ignoring data and statistics, which has become the norm in this COVID era, the conventional health care system is headed for collapse.

This seems particularly true when you consider hospitals have, over the past two years, completely shredded patients’ trust by mistreating and outright killing COVID-19 patients with the most dangerous treatments available. Rather than collaborating with peers, most doctors have blindly followed financially-driven and politically biased protocols handed down from the reigning “priesthood,” and the results have been nothing short of disastrous.

Speaking of disastrous, California has introduced a bill8 that will strip doctors of their medical licenses if they express medical views that the state does not agree with, basically reducing medicine to a state-sanctioned one-size-fits-all endeavor. Absolutely nothing good can come of such a plan. I discussed this in “Bill Seeks to Muzzle Doctors Who Tell the Truth About COVID.”

This bill, AB-2098, was passed by House vote (53 to 20), May 26, 2022, and is currently in the Senate.9 If this law is passed in California, we will probably begin to see similar or identical bills introduced in other states as well.

If your trust in doctors has already waned, implementation of such a law is sure to carpet bomb whatever trust is left into oblivion, because all you’ll be able to get, no matter who you go to, is the state-sponsored opinion. What happens then? How do we care for our health if our doctors are legally prevented from giving us their best advice? This is such a radical departure from sanity and sound practice that it’s hard to even imagine what medicine will look like at that point.

The answer, I believe, will be for good, caring medical professionals to start building parallel health care systems, such as those detailed in Christofferson’s book, “Curable.” We may also have to take on greater responsibility for finding solutions to our own health problems. “Take control of your health” has been my motto and tagline since I started this website, but it’s more important now than ever.

In years past, one of the greatest risks a patient faced was a doctor lacking nutritional know-how. In the future, the greatest risk could be doctors outright lying to you, even to the point of sending you to a more or less certain death, just to stay in practice. I hope it won’t come to that. But prevent it, we must resist and oppose these kinds of treacherous plots wherever and whenever they crop up.

• Sources and References:

1 Libertarian Institute July 30, 2021
2 Technocracy News August 2, 2021
3, 4, 5 Reason May 2022
6, 7 Disinformation Chronicle Substack May 31, 2022
8 California Assembly Bill AB-2098
9 California Assembly Bill AB-2098, History

• source