Vaccine Crimes

[mountain_jim]

FW Bio Clandestine:

If you haven’t done so yet, I would highly advise all my followers to listen to the newest Joe Rogan episode with Dr. Bret Weinstein.

The public conversation around C19 is heating up, and the more mainstream avenues are dipping their toes into the widely apparent reality that C19 is a man-made bioweapon.

Dr. Weinstein essentially says it here, and summarizes my entire thesis.

“If this wasn’t a natural spillover event, then we know who did it”.

Fauci, Collins, and their DNC handlers.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantFox

1h
·
·
Red Wave Riders
Early Knowledge on C19 May Have Been Hidden for a 'Cryptic, Massive Transfer of Wealth'

There is substantial evidence that suggests C19 was circulating as early as Sep. 2019.

500 new billionaires subsequently emerged. RFK Jr. calls it the "biggest shift of wealth in history."

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/s...z4ZL8lNO3cIb4w

[onawah]

COVID Boosters Trigger Metastasis
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
January 05, 2023
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...bid=1686966928

(Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here)
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Cancer rates have increased since the introduction of the COVID shots and is now one of the top three leading causes of premature death among younger adults — a trend that in turn is driving down U.S. life expectancy
The leading causes of death in 2021 were heart disease and cancer, both of which are potential side effects of the COVID jabs
Dr. Angus Dalgleish, professor of oncology at St. George’s University of London, warns that COVID boosters may be causing aggressive metastatic cancers
Research shows SARS-CoV-2 spike protein obliterates 90% of the DNA repair mechanism in lymphocytes, a type of white blood cell that helps your body fight infection and chronic disease, including cancer
The COVID jab is less effective in lymphoma patients.
]Emory University researchers found only 68% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia developed neutralizing antibodies after the second dose, compared to 100% of healthy controls

Cancer rates have increased since the introduction of the COVID shots and is one of the top three leading causes of premature death among younger adults — a trend that in turn is driving down U.S. life expectancy.

In 2019, the average life span of Americans of all ethnicities was nearly 78.8 years.1 By the end of 2021, life expectancy had dropped to 76.42 — a loss of nearly three years, which is an astounding decline. The leading causes of death in 2021 were heart disease, cancer and COVID-19, all three of which were higher in 2021 than in 2020,3 and both heart disease and cancer are potential side effects of the COVID jabs.

COVID Boosters Are Triggering Metastatic Cancer
November 26, 2022, The Daily Sceptic published a letter4,5 to the editor of The BMJ, written by Dr. Angus Dalgleish, professor of oncology at St. George’s University of London, warning that COVID boosters may be causing aggressive metastatic cancers:

“COVID no longer needs a vaccine programme given the average age of death of COVID in the U.K. is 82 and from all other causes is 81 and falling,” Dalgleish writes.6 “The link with clots, myocarditis, heart attacks and strokes is now well accepted, as is the link with myelitis and neuropathy ...

However, there is now another reason to halt all vaccine programmes. As a practicing oncologist I am seeing people with stable disease rapidly progress after being forced to have a booster, usually so they can travel. Even within my own personal contacts I am seeing B cell-based disease after the boosters.

They describe being distinctly unwell a few days to weeks after the booster — one developing leukemia, two work colleagues Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and an old friend who has felt like he has had Long COVID since receiving his booster and who, after getting severe bone pain, has been diagnosed as having multiple metastases from a rare B cell disorder.

I am experienced enough to know that these are not the coincidental anecdotes ... The reports of innate immune suppression after mRNA for several weeks would fit, as all these patients to date have melanoma or B cell based cancers, which are very susceptible to immune control — and that is before the reports of suppressor gene suppression by mRNA in laboratory experiments. This must be aired and debated immediately.”

New Norm: Explosive Cancer Relapses
In a December 19, 2022, article7 in Conservative Woman, Dalgleish continues discussing the phenomenon of rapidly spreading cancers in patients who were in stable remission for years before receiving their COVID boosters. He notes that after his letter to The BMJ was published, several oncologists have contacted him to say they’re seeing the same thing in their own practices.

“Seeing the recurrence of these cancers after all this time naturally makes me wonder if there is a common cause?” he writes.8 “I had previously noted that relapse in stable cancer is often associated with severe long-term stress, such as bankruptcy, divorce, etc.

However, I found that none of my patients had any such extra stress during this time, but they had all had booster vaccines and, indeed, a couple of them noted that they had a very bad reaction to the booster which they did not have to the first two injections.

I then noted that some of these patients were not having a normal pattern of relapse but rather an explosive relapse, with metastases occurring at the same time in several sites ... Scientifically, I was reading reports that the booster was leading to a big excess of antibodies at the expense of the T-cell response and that this T-cell suppression could last for three weeks, if not more.

To me, this could be causal as the immune system is being asked to make an excessive response through the humoral inflammatory part of the immune response against a virus (the alpha-delta variant) which is no longer in existence in the community.

This exertion leads to immune exhaustion, which is why these patients are reporting up to a 50% greater increase in Omicron, or other variations, than the non-vaccinated.”

A Change of Heart and Mind
Interestingly, in mid-2021, the Daily Mail published an article in which Dalgleish encouraged people to get the COVID shot, especially younger individuals.9 Dalgleish explains that, at the time, there was an “overwhelming push by the government and the medical community ... that this would be in everyone’s best interest.”

So, he caved to the narrative, even though he had concerns from the start. Now, however, the environment has changed and there’s really no need for these experimental shots anymore.

His concerns further grew when his son developed myocarditis “after having a jab he did not want but that he needed for work and travel purposes.” A friend of his son, who was in his early 30s, suffered a stroke after his jab, and a relative of a close colleague died from a heart attack at the age of 34 after hers.

“I began to be highly alarmed that it was the vaccines causing these symptoms,” Dalgleish writes,10 “and that just as we had written11 ... a genetically engineered virus had serious implications for vaccine design.

This paper, which was suppressed and therefore did not appear in print for many months, reported that the sequence of the virus was completely consistent with having been genetically engineered, with a furin cleavage site and six inserts at places that would make the virus very infectious, and the reason this had such tremendous implications for vaccine design was that 80% of these sequences had homology to human epitopes.

In particular, we had noticed a homology with platelet factor 4 and myelin. The former is also certainly associated with what is known as VITT (low platelets and clotting issues) and the latter associated with all the neurological problems, such as transverse myelitis, both of which are now recognized as side effects of the vaccine even by the MHRA [Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency in the UK].”

Authorities Have Willfully Ignored All Warning Signals
Dalgleish says his team’s findings were eventually circulated among cabinet members and various medical committees, but everyone ignored them. As a result, many have been placed at unnecessary risk for serious injury and/or death.

As Dalgleish points out, young hearts over-express the ACE receptor that the virus was engineered to bind to. This binding with the ACE2 receptor is what “sets off the inflammatory response, which leads to myocarditis, pericarditis, stroke and deaths,” Dalgleish says.

This could explain the dramatic increase observed in deaths of young athletes who were jabbed: They simply have more ACE2 receptors that bind to the spike proteins created by the jab. Dalgleish continues:12

“When the facts change, or new facts emerge, the position of all those in authority directing mandates should change but unfortunately, they did not.

I tried desperately to point out that all the evidence that vaccines might have been useful in helping to curtail the pandemic was changing; that it was becoming very clear that there were highly significant side effects to the vaccine programme that Pfizer had gone to great lengths to cover up, and that it was only a court case in the US that led to them becoming available.

At this stage the whole vaccine programme should have been stopped but nobody seemed to want to address this, neither the Government, the medical authorities or the media.

Having written many articles for the Daily Mail arguing against lockdown and for it never to be used again, I was extremely keen to address my change of opinion on the vaccines and to warn people of their dangers particularly to younger people, and to point out there were no grounds at all for giving it to children.

Unfortunately, all my efforts and approaches to the mainstream media on this subject have been rejected. This, I believe, is something that will come back to haunt all those who introduced an Orwellian kind of suppression to the emerging truth, which labelled doctors trying to save their patients along the lines of ‘first do no harm’ as outcasts or villains.”

Scientific Proof COVID Jab Causes Cancer
Back in August 2022, The Exposé13 highlighted scientific evidence showing the COVID jabs can cause cancer of the ovaries, pancreas and breast, and that “a monumental cover-up is taking place to suppress the consequences ... on women’s health.”

Research shows SARS-CoV-2 spike protein obliterates 90% of the DNA repair mechanism in lymphocytes, a type of white blood cells that help your body fight infection and chronic disease, including cancer.
The research in question was that of Jiang and Mei, who published a peer-reviewed article showing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein obliterated the DNA repair mechanism in lymphocytes, a type of white blood cells that play an important role in your immune system. Lymphocytes help your body fight infection and chronic disease, including cancer. Professional data analyst Joel Smalley writes:14

“The viral spike protein was so toxic to this pathway that it knocked 90% of it out. If the whole spike protein got into the nucleus (in the ovaries), and enough of it was produced and hung around long enough before the body was able to get rid of it all, it would cause cancer. Fortunately, in the case of natural infection, this is unlikely to occur.

Unfortunately, the experimental mRNA toxshot induces spike protein to be produced (the full-length spike exactly matching — amino acid for amino acid — the full length of the viral spike protein15) in and around the cell nucleus and is produced for at least 60 days and almost certainly longer.16

‘Fact checkers’ said the viral spike protein doesn’t get in the nucleus despite the expert scientists showing that it absolutely does. Public health authorities and regulators said the vaccinal spike protein doesn’t get in the nucleus despite the mRNA manufacturers submitting pictures of it doing so to them as part of their emergency use application ...



Jiang and Mei, quite logically and reasonably, cautioned that the mRNA spike protein would likely have the same effect as the viral spike protein on p53 and therefore cause cancer ... [The] Jiang and Mei paper was retracted due to spurious ‘expressions of concern’ (EOC) about the methods of the study despite them being standard practice ...

Well, despite the retraction, the spike protein circulating in large quantities, in the direct vicinity of the cell nucleus, for elongated periods of time, still has the potential to induce cancer in those cells (ovary, pancreas, breast, prostate, lymph nodes). These cancers can take years to develop and so it’s possible that we don’t see much of a safety signal for 5 or 10 years.”

As noted by Smalley, one of the authors of the EOC that led to the retraction of the paper was Eric Freed, Ph.D., who heads up the U.S. National Institutes of Health’s Center for Cancer Research.

He’s been a tenured investigator with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and NIH since 2002,17 the very agencies that funded Moderna’s mRNA jab, yet this conflict of interest was not disclosed in the EOC.

A Not so Rare Cancer Case
At the end of September 2022, The Atlantic18 featured the story of Belgian immunologist Michel Goldman, 67, who in the spring of 2021 got his first and second COVID shot. In the fall that year, he was diagnosed with lymphoma, cancer of the immune system.

Mere weeks after his body scan and diagnosis, he got his first booster, thinking he needed it since he’d soon become immunocompromised by the chemotherapy. But the booster caused a rapid decline in his health.

Another body scan at the end of September 2021, just three weeks after his first scan, revealed “a brand-new barrage of cancer lesions — so many spots that it looked like someone had set off fireworks inside Michel’s body,” Roxanne Khamsi writes:19

“More than that, the lesions were now prominent on both sides of the body, with new clusters blooming in Michel’s right armpit, and along the right side of his neck.



When Michel’s hematologist saw the scan, she told him to report directly to the nearest hospital pharmacy. He’d have to start on steroid pills right away, she told him. Such a swift progression for lymphoma in just three weeks was highly unusual, and he could not risk waiting a single day longer.

As he followed these instructions, Michel felt a gnawing worry that his COVID booster shot had somehow made him sicker. His brother [Serge, head of nuclear medicine at the hospital of the Université Libre de Bruxelles] was harboring a similar concern.

The asymmetrical cluster of cancerous nodes around Michel’s left armpit on the initial scan had already seemed ‘a bit disturbing,’ as his brother said; especially given that Michel’s first two doses of vaccine had been delivered on that side. Now he’d had a booster shot in the other arm, and the cancer’s asymmetry was flipped.

The brothers knew this might be just an eerie coincidence. But they couldn’t shake the feeling that Michel had experienced what would be a very rare yet life-threatening side effect of COVID vaccination.”20

T Cells Gone Berserk
Goldman, who was an early champion of the mRNA COVID shots, now “suspected that he was their unlucky victim,” Khamsi writes.21 He decided to go public about his cancer despite fears “anti-vaxxers” would use it to argue against the COVID jab. His concern for people who had the same type of cancer he had won out.

There are approximately 30 different subtypes of lymphoma. The kind Goldman had — angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma — attacks follicular helper T cells, which play a crucial role in your body’s immune response to invading pathogens.

Helper T cells serve as a messenger between dendritic cells, which identify the pathogen, and B cells that make the appropriate antibodies. The mRNA COVID shots “are especially effective at generating that message, and spurring its passage through the helper T cells,” Khamsi writes.

This activation of helper T cells is part of what makes the COVID jabs work. But Goldman began to suspect that revving up those helper T cells might in some cases cause them to go berserk, resulting in tumors, or worsening of already existing ones.

Other Case Reports
Goldman was lucky. He lived to talk about it. Many others have not been so fortunate. And while he still believes he’s an “ultra-rare” case, he’s since received reports from other patients who suddenly developed angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma after their shots. As reported by Khamsi:22

“Around the time of his February follow-up, Michel received a message from a doctor who had read his self-referential case report. The doctor’s mother had been diagnosed with the same subtype of lymphoma that Michel has following a COVID booster shot. More recently, he got an email from a woman whose sister had been vaccinated and received that diagnosis the following month.”

In August 2022, Frontiers in Medicine published a case report23 describing “rapid progression of marginal zone B-cell lymphoma” following the COVID jab. The 80-year-old Japanese woman featured in the report developed a noticeable tumor the very next day after her first shot. According to the authors:24

“Initially, we suspected head-and-neck benign lymphadenopathy as a side effect of vaccination. Nine weeks later, the number of swollen submandibular and parotid glands increased, and the lymph nodes further enlarged.

Finally, the right temporal mass was diagnosed as marginal zone B-cell lymphoma based on immunohistochemical and flow cytometry findings of biopsy specimens.

Our findings suggest that although 4-6 weeks of observation for lymph node inflammation after the second vaccination is recommended, malignancy should also be considered in the differential diagnosis of lymphadenopathy following vaccination.”

COVID Jab Is Far Less Effective in Lymphoma Patients
In May 2022, a single-center study25 at Emory University discovered that the humoral immune response in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) was significantly reduced after getting a COVID jab, compared to people who did not have either of those diagnoses.

Patients with NHL or CLL also didn’t have nearly the same antibody response to the shot. Only 68% of them developed neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 after the second dose, compared to 100% of healthy controls. NHL/CLL patients who had undergone anti–CD20-directed therapies within one year of the first dose had the lowest antibody levels.

Turbo-Charged Cancers Are Becoming More Prevalent


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/A4qFrwmGeMBE/


Data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED)26 — historically one of the most well-kept and most heavily-relied upon medical databases in the world — showed that, compared to the previous five-year averages, cancer among Department of Defense (DOD) personnel in 2021 skyrocketed.

Overall, cancers tripled among servicemen and their family members after the rollout of the COVID shots. Breast cancer went up 487%. Exploding cancer rates are also seen elsewhere. One of the first to warn that the shots might cause cancer was Dr. Ryan Cole, a pathologist who runs his own pathology lab.

He suspects the shots accelerate already existing cancers by way of immune dysregulation.27 He noticed that cancers that were previously well-controlled would suddenly grow out of control and rapidly lead to death once they got the COVID jab.

Swedish pathologist, researcher and senior physician at Lund’s University, Dr. Ute Kruger, has also observed an explosion in rapidly advancing cancers in the wake of the COVID shots. For example, she’s noticed:28,29

Cancer patients are getting younger — The largest increase is among 30- to 50-year-olds
Tumor sizes are dramatically larger — Historically, 3-centimeter tumors were commonly found at the time of cancer diagnosis. Now, the tumors they’re finding are regularly 4 to 12 centimeters, which suggests they’re growing at a much faster rate than normal
Multiple tumors in multiple organs are becoming more common
Recurrence and metastasis are increasing — Kruger points out that many of the cancer patients she’s seeing have been in remission for years, only to suddenly be beset with uncontrollable cancer growth and metastasis shortly after their COVID jab
These “turbo-cancers,” as Kruger calls them, cannot be explained by delayed cancer screenings due to lockdowns and other COVID restrictions, as those days are long gone. Patients, despite having access to medical screenings as in years past, are showing up with grossly exacerbated tumor growths, and she believes this is because the cancers are being “turbo-charged” by the mRNA jabs.

Disturbingly, as detailed in “How Cancer Deaths From the COVID Jabs Are Being Hidden,” analysis of U.S. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) data suggests the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has been filtering out and redesignating cancer deaths as COVID deaths since April 2021 to eliminate the cancer signal. The signal is being hidden by swapping the underlying cause of death with main cause of death."

- Sources and References
1 CDC Press release July 21, 2021
2 CDC Provisional Life Expectancy Estimates for 2021, August 2022
3 USA Today December 22, 2022
4, 6 Daily Sceptic November 26, 2022
5 Conservative Woman November 28, 2022
7, 8, 9, 10, 12 Conservative Woman December 19, 2022
11 Evidence Which Suggests This Is No Naturally Evolved Virus July 13, 2020
13, 14 The Expose August 2, 2022
15 Science Based Medicine May 5, 2021
16 Cell March 17, 2022; 185(6): 1025-1040.e14
17 Retrovirology July 2, 2018; 15 Article number 43
18, 19, 20, 21, 22 The Atlantic September 24, 2022
23, 24 Frontiers in Medicine August 1, 2022; 9: 963393
25 ASCO Daily News May 25, 2022
26 Renz-law.com
27 Steve Kirsch Substack February 5, 2022
28 Etana Substack August 4, 2022
29 Doctors4CovidEthics.org July 26, 2022

[Eric J (Viking)]

Picked this up on my travels.. not sure if posted but let’s see where this goes

“It's over, the complaint has just fallen:

Last news;

The complaint for global crimes against humanity, filed and accepted by the Superior Court of Justice of Canada (see link below), has begun. A team of more than 1,000 lawyers and more than 10,000 medical experts, led by Germany's Reiner Fuellmich, one of Europe's most powerful lawyers, has launched the biggest complaint in history called "Nuremberg 2". against the WHO (World Health Organization) and the Davos Group (World Economic Forum headed by Klaus Schwab, aged over 80) for crimes against humanity.

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is a German-American lawyer who has won multi-million dollar lawsuits against the Deutsche Bank scam and the one against Volkswagen for the Dieselgate scam. He is one of the founders of the "German Crown Inquiry Commission". Fuellmich and his team have collected thousands of scientific evidences demonstrating the complete unreliability of PCR tests and the fraud behind them. Fuellmich then spoke of vaccines and noted that "they have nothing to do with vaccines, but are part of genetic experiments". In addition to faulty tests and fraudulent death certificates issued by corrupt medical personnel, the "experimental" vaccine itself violates Article 32 of the Geneva Convention.

According to Article 32 of the Fourth Convention of 1949, "mutilation and medical or scientific experimentation which is not necessary for the medical treatment of a person" is prohibited. According to article 147, carrying out biological experiments on human beings constitutes a serious violation of the Convention. The "experimental" vaccine violates the 10 Nuremberg codes, which provide for the death penalty for those who break these international treaties." Fuellmich also added that this was all long planned to be implemented in 2050. "But then" , the strings have become greedy and have decided to anticipate the plans first in 2030 and finally in 2020 in this rush that they make so many mistakes.

For example, the vaccine manufacturers had not anticipated that there would be so many side effects and deaths.” “Europe,” continues Fuellmich, “which is the main battleground in this war. This is because she is completely bankrupt. The pension funds have been completely plundered. That's why they want to take over Europe before people know about it. What is happening ".

But who are these people pulling the strings? According to Fuellmich, this is a group of about 3,000 super-rich. The Davos clique around Klaus Schwab is part of this group. What do they want?

Total control over the human being. They bribe doctors, hospital staff and politicians. "People who don't cooperate are threatened. They use all kinds of psychological techniques to manipulate people."

“The mainstream media,” Fuellmich summarizes, “tells a false reality and says that the majority of people are in favor of measures and vaccines. That is certainly not true.

For example, almost everyone I talk to in Germany knows that a mask does not protect against anything, because in the meantime almost everyone is informed by the alternative media. The old media are dying."

Fuellmich's advice?

"Spread the truth and the facts as widely as possible and don't waste your energy on people who are hopelessly vaccinated. We can't save everyone. A lot of people are going to die."

Viking

Mod note from Bill:
The link appears to be https://corona-investigative-committee.com, but I can't find the exact announcement or article.

Thanks Bill.

[mountain_jim]

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/WallStreetSilv/s...k-vyFSiOMk2GcQ

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/backtolife_2023/...VTELWN90Y94rmw

https://twitter.com/LynnFynn3/status...VTELWN90Y94rmw

https://twitter.com/DavidBCollum/sta...VTELWN90Y94rmw

https://twitter.com/PositivelyEmpo1/...VTELWN90Y94rmw

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/...COa4GbwXQf9OUQ

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/...s-pfizer-board

From the Twitter Files: Pfizer board member Scott Gottlieb secretly pressed Twitter to hide posts challenging his company's massively profitable Covid jabs

To funnel his demands, Gottlieb used the same Twitter lobbyist the White House did - fresh evidence of overlap between the company selling mRNA shots and the government forcing them on the public.

Alex Berenson
2 hr ago
On August 27, 2021, Dr. Scott Gottlieb - a Pfizer director with over 550,000 Twitter followers - saw a tweet he didn’t like, a tweet that might hurt sales of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines.

The tweet explained correctly that natural immunity after Covid infection was superior to vaccine protection. It called on the White House to “follow the science” and exempt people with natural immunity from upcoming vaccine mandates.

It came not from an “anti-vaxxer” like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., but from Dr. Brett Giroir, a physician who had briefly followed Gottlieb as the head of the Food & Drug Administration. Further, the tweet actually encouraged people who did not have natural immunity to “Get vaccinated!”

No matter.

By suggesting some people might not need Covid vaccinations, the tweet could raise questions about the shots. Besides being former FDA commissioner, a CNBC contributor, and a prominent voice on Covid public policy, Gottlieb was a senior board member at Pfizer, which depended on mRNA jabs for almost half its $81 billion in sales in 2021. Pfizer paid Gottlieb $365,000 for his work that year.

Gottlieb stepped in, emailing Todd O’Boyle, a top lobbyist in Twitter’s Washington office who was also Twitter’s point of contact with the White House.

The post was “corrosive,” Gottlieb wrote. He worried it would “end up going viral and driving news coverage.”



(SOURCE: Twitter)

I found the email in a search of records I ran at Twitter last week - part of Elon Musk’s “Twitter Files” effort to raise the veil on censorship decisions Twitter made before Musk bought the company in October.

I went into detail about my involvement at the Twitter Files in a Substack article yesterday. I plan more reporting on the files in the weeks to come.

Through Jira, an internal system Twitter used for managing complaints, O’Boyle forwarded Gottlieb’s email to the Twitter “Strategic Response” team. That group was responsible for handling concerns from the company’s most important employees and users.

“Please see this report from the former FDA commissioner,” O’Boyle wrote - failing to mention that Gottlieb was a Pfizer board member with a financial interest in pushing mRNA shots.

A Strategic Response analyst quickly found the tweet did not violate any of the company’s misinformation rules.

Yet Twitter wound up flagging Giroir’s tweet anyway, putting a misleading tag on it and preventing almost anyone from seeing it. It remains tagged even though several large studies have confirmed the truth of Giroir’s words.



(SOURCE)

—

A week later, on Sept. 3, 2021, Gottlieb tried to strike again, complaining to O’Boyle about a tweet from Justin Hart. Hart is a lockdown and Covid vaccine skeptic with more than 100,000 Twitter followers.

“Sticks and stones may break my bones but a viral pathogen with a child mortality rate of <>0% has cost our children nearly three years of schooling,” Hart had written.

Why Gottlieb objected to Hart’s words is not clear, but the Pfizer shot would soon be approved for children 5 to 11, representing another massive market for Pfizer, if parents could be convinced Covid was a real threat to their kids.

O’Boyle referred to “former FDA Commissioner Gottlieb” when he forwarded the report, again ignoring Gottlieb’s current work for Pfizer.

This time, though, Gottlieb’s complaint was so far afield that Twitter refused to act.

—

At the same time, Gottlieb was also pressing Twitter to act against me, as I disclosed on Substack on Oct. 13, 2022, drawing on documents that Twitter’s pre-Musk regime provided to me as part of my lawsuit against it. (Gottlieb’s action was part of a larger conspiracy that included the Biden White House and Andrew Slavitt, working publicly and privately to pressure Twitter until it had no choice but to ban me. I will have more to say about my own case and will be suing the White House, Slavitt, Gottlieb, and Pfizer shortly.)

The morning after I wrote that article, Gottlieb appeared on CNBC, the financial news channel where he is a contributor, and offered what at best was a seriously misleading explanation of his actions and his motives.

Gottlieb did not deny pressing Twitter on me - he could not, given the documents I had released the night before.

But in an interview with Joe Kernan of CNBC, Gottlieb said he had asked Twitter to act only because he was concerned if tweets raised the threat of violence against vaccine advocates.

“The inability of these platforms to police direct threats, physical threats about people, that’s my concern about what’s going on in that ecosystem,” Gottlieb said.



SOURCE

"I'm unconcerned about debate being made,” Gottlieb told Kernan. “I'm concerned about physical threats being made for people's safety."

In a tweet that morning, Gottlieb doubled down, writing:

Respectful debate and dialogue is one thing, and should be encouraged and protected. But there's no place for targeted harassment, and misleading dialogue which can instigate a small but persuadable group of people to make targeted and dangerous threats.

But Brett Giroir’s tweet about natural immunity was the definition of “respectful debate and dialogue.” And in his own email to Todd O’Boyle, Gottlieb did not raise any security concerns about it. He simply complained that it might wind up “driving news coverage.

—

Gottlieb is not just a Pfizer board member.

He is one of seven members of the board’s executive committee and the head of its regulatory and compliance committee, which oversees “compliance with laws, regulations, and internal procedures applicable to pharmaceutical sales and marketing activities.”

Pfizer has a long history of violating drug industry laws and ethics rules. In 2009, it agreed to pay $2.3 billion, the largest health care fraud settlement in American history, for fraudulently marketing several drugs. In 1996, it conducted a clinical trial of an antibiotic in Nigeria in which 11 children died and which became the inspiration for John le Carre’s novel The Constant Gardner.

[mountain_jim]

I have been following this writer/researcher for a long while, on Gab, Telegram, and Substack.

Now his articles are being published by RFK JR's organization.

@intheMatrixxx
Forwarded from
KanekoaTheGreat
I'm honored to have my article published by the great Robert F. Kennedy Jr, who wrote the blockbuster best-selling book The Real Anthony Fauci.

#ExposePfizer

👊❤️🇺🇸

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...ud-corruption/

Share the thread below.⬇️
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/...75049562951681

01/09/23
•
BIG PHARMA
› VIEWS

Pfizer Has a Long History of Fraud, Corruption and Using Children as Human Guinea Pigs

Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla claimed during a November 2021 interview that a small group of “medical professionals” who are intentionally circulating “misinformation” critical of the Pfizer vaccine narrative are “criminals,” but Bourla didn’t mention the criminal history of his own company.

By
Kanekoa News



One of the most significant cultural transformations of the last two years has been the newfound glorification of the pharmaceutical industry.

An industry plagued by decades of fraud, corruption and criminality managed to quickly rebrand itself as the savior of humanity during the COVID-19 crisis.

But nothing inherently changed. Big Pharma still values shareholders’ profits more than people’s lives.

The regulatory agencies still operate as revolving doors to the pharmaceutical giants they are said to regulate.

Big Pharma still dominates lobbying efforts in Washington, D.C., and spends billions each year advertising pharmaceutical products.

Despite the notorious corrupt nature of the pharmaceutical industry, Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla claimed during a November 2021 interview that a small group of “medical professionals” who are intentionally circulating “misinformation” critical of the Pfizer vaccine narrative are “criminals.”

Bourla seemed to have forgotten about the history of his own company.

Pfizer’s long history of criminal behavior

• In 1992, Pfizer agreed to pay between $165 million and $215 million to settle lawsuits arising from the fracturing of its Bjork-Shiley Convexo-Concave heart valve, which at the time had resulted in nearly 300 deaths, and by 2012 had resulted in 663 deaths.
  
• In 1994, Pfizer agreed to pay $10.75 million to settle Justice Department claims that the company lied to get federal approval for a mechanical heart valve that has fractured, killing hundreds of patients worldwide.

Under the settlement, Pfizer also agreed to pay $9.25 million in coming years to monitor patients who received the device at Veterans Administration hospitals or pay for its removal.

The deal was criticized by consumer rights activists who urged Government officials to bring criminal charges and lobbied for a steeper civil penalty for the multibillion-dollar company that had covered up safety concerns even as the device was killing patients.

• In 1996, Pfizer administered an experimental drug during a clinical trial on 200 children in Nigeria but never told the parents that their children were the subjects of an experiment. Eleven of the children died, and many others suffered side effects such as brain damage and organ failure.

A report by Nigeria’s health ministry concluded the experiment was “an illegal trial of an unregistered drug,” a “clear case of exploitation of the ignorant,” and a violation of Nigerian and international law. Pfizer did not obtain consent or inform the patients that they were the subjects of an experiment, not the recipients of an approved drug.

• In 2002, Pfizer agreed to pay $49 million to settle allegations that the drug company defrauded the federal government and 40 states by charging too much for its cholesterol treatment Lipitor. Lipitor had sales of $6.45 billion in 2001.
  
• In 2004, Pfizer agreed to plead guilty to two felonies and paid $430 million in penalties to settle charges that it fraudulently promoted the drug Neurontin for unapproved uses.

Pfizer agreed that it aggressively marketed the epilepsy drug illicitly for unrelated conditions, including bipolar disorder, pain, migraine headaches and drug and alcohol withdrawal. Pfizer’s tactics included planting company operatives in the audience at medical education events and bribing doctors with luxury trips.

• In 2008, the New York Times published an article entitled “Experts Conclude Pfizer Manipulated Studies.” Pfizer delayed the publication of negative studies, spun negative data to place it in a more positive light and controlled the flow of clinical research data to promote its epilepsy drug Neurontin.

Pfizer discontinued its marketing program for Neurontin in 2004 after the drug became available as a generic. That same year, the company paid $430 million to settle federal criminal and civil claims that one of its subsidiaries had promoted the drug for unapproved uses.

• In 2009, Pfizer was fined $2.3 billion, then the largest healthcare fraud settlement and the largest criminal fine ever imposed in the U.S. Pfizer pled guilty to misbranding the painkiller Bextra with “the intent to defraud or mislead,” promoting the drug to treat acute pain at dosages the FDA had previously deemed dangerously high.

The government alleged that Pfizer had paid kickbacks to compliant doctors and also promoted three other drugs illegally: the antipsychotic Geodon, an antibiotic Zyvox and the antiepileptic drug Lyrica.

• In 2009, Pfizer paid $750 million to settle 35,000 claims that its drug, Rezulin, was responsible for 63 deaths and dozens of liver failures. Rezulin’s withdrawal from the U.S. market on March 21, 2000, followed negotiations between the drug’s manufacturer and the FDA.

Senior FDA officials had long stood behind the drug despite a mounting death toll and Rezulin’s absence of proven life-saving benefits. The position of the FDA officials stood in contrast to their counterparts in Britain, where Rezulin was removed effectively on Dec. 1, 1997.

• In 2010, Pfizer was ordered to pay $142.1 million in damages for violating federal anti-racketeering law by its fraudulent sale and marketing of Neurontin for uses not approved by the FDA. The jury found that Pfizer’s marketing of Neurontin violated both the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act and California’s Unfair Competition Law.
  
• In 2010, the New York Times published an article entitled “Pfizer Gives Details on Payments to Doctors.” Pfizer admitted that it paid about $20 million to 4,500 doctors and other medical professionals for consulting and speaking on its behalf in the last six months of 2009.

Pfizer also paid $15.3 million to 250 academic medical centers and other research groups for clinical trials in the same period. The disclosures were required by an agreement that the company signed to settle a federal investigation into the illegal promotion of drugs for off-label uses.



< out of time for now - many, many links and more article at link >

[TomKat]

Moderna is reportedly paying off families of vaccine victimes and relocating them, as in witsec:




Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/OkHDpXOVI3wJ

[onawah]

Biden Officials ‘Relentless’ in Pressuring Social Media Companies to Censor COVID Content
01/10/23
By The Defender Staff
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...a-fbc33a92a86f

(Lots of hyperlinks embedded in the article that are not embedded here.)

"The authors of a Wall Street Journal op-ed published Sunday called out the “relentless, coercive pressure” the White House put on social media companies to censor COVID-19-related information that contradicted the government and mainstream media narrative.
The authors of a Wall Street Journal op-ed published Sunday called out the “relentless, coercive pressure” the White House put on social media companies to censor COVID-19-related information that contradicted the government and mainstream media narrative.

Jenin Younes and Dr. Aaron Kheriaty detailed key parts of an email exchange between Robert Flaherty, the White House’s director of digital strategy and social media executives.

The emails emerged Jan. 6 in the discovery phase of Missouri v. Biden, a free-speech lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana and four private plaintiffs represented by the New Civil Liberties Alliance.

Younes is litigation counsel at the New Civil Liberties Alliance and represents the private plaintiffs in Missouri v. Biden. Kheriaty is a psychiatrist and author of three books, a senior scholar at the Brownstone Institute, a fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and one of the plaintiffs.

The emails are the latest in a slew of evidence — made public through lawsuits, Freedom of Information Act requests and the “Twitter files” — that emerged in the last few months exposing “a sprawling censorship regime involving the White House, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI and other agencies.”

Robert F. Kennedy Jr
@RobertKennedyJr
Here are the emails that show the White House colluded with Twitter to censor my tweets.
childrenshealthdefense.org
White House Colluded With Twitter to Censor RFK, Jr., Emails Reveal
A series of Jan. 6 tweets by Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey detailed how Biden officials sought to censor tweets by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chairman 5:27 PM · Jan 9, 2023

1.6M
Views
10.9K
Retweets
253
Quote Tweets
34.1K
Likes

This included targeting tweets by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chairman and chief litigation counsel of Children’s Health Defense, conservative commentator Tucker Carlson and others.

In their op-ed, Younes and Kheriaty cited the text of emails between Flaherty and a Facebook executive. Flaherty accuses Facebook of being “one of the top drivers of vaccine hesitancy” and demands to know how the social media platform is working to change this on Facebook and WhatsApp.

Facebook responded with an extensive list of policy changes, including “removing vaccine misinformation,” “reducing the virality of content discouraging vaccines that does not contain actionable misinformation” and removing accounts “sensationalizing” what they acknowledged was “often true content.”

Unsatisfied with the results, Flaherty continued to pressure Facebook:

“Mr. Flaherty pressed the executive about why ‘the top post about vaccines today’ is Tucker Carlson ‘saying they don’t work’: ‘I want to know what ‘Reduction’ actually looks like,’ he said. The exec responded: ‘Running this down now.”

The documents reveal that Flaherty “also strong-armed Google in April 2021, accusing YouTube (which it owns) of ‘funneling’ people into vaccine hesitancy. He said this concern was ‘shared at the highest (and I mean the highest) levels of the WH,’ and required ‘more work to be done.’”

Younes and Kheriaty also pointed out that President Biden, then-press secretary Jen Psaki and Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy publicly vowed to hold the platforms accountable if they didn’t heighten censorship.

They wrote:

“On July 16, 2021, a reporter asked Mr. Biden his ‘message to platforms like Facebook.’ He replied, ‘They’re killing people.’ Mr. Biden later claimed he meant users, not platforms, were killing people. But the record shows Facebook itself was the target of the White House’s pressure campaign.”

According to Younes and Kheriaty, the recently uncovered emails establish a clear pattern of the White House, represented by Flaherty, expressing anger at the companies’ failure to satisfactorily censor COVID-19 content. The companies changed their policies in response to his demands.

“As a result of that unconstitutional state action, Americans were given the false impression of a scientific ‘consensus’ on critically important issues around Covid-19,” the authors of the op-ed wrote. “A reckoning for the government’s unlawful, deceptive and dangerous conduct is under way in court.”
********
The Wall Street Journal article referenced above:
The White House Covid Censorship Machine
Newly released emails show how officials coerce social-media companies to toe the government line.
By Jenin Younes and Aaron Kheriaty
Jan. 8, 2023
https://www.wsj.com/articles/white-h...le-11673203704
"Newly released documents show that the White House has played a major role in censoring Americans on social media. Email exchanges between Rob Flaherty, the White House’s director of digital media, and social-media executives prove the companies put Covid censorship policies in place in response to relentless, coercive pressure from the White House—not voluntarily. The emails emerged Jan. 6 in the discovery phase of Missouri v. Biden, a free-speech case brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana and four private plaintiffs represented by the New Civil Liberties Alliance.

On March 14, 2021, Mr. Flaherty emailed a Facebook executive (whose name we’ve redacted as a courtesy) with the subject line “You are hiding the ball” and a link to a Washington Post article about Facebook’s own research into “the spread of ideas that contribute to vaccine hesitancy,” as the paper put it. “I think there is a misunderstanding,” the executive wrote back. “I don’t think this is a misunderstanding,” Mr. Flaherty replied. “We are gravely concerned that your service is one of the top drivers of vaccine hesitancy—period. . . . We want to know that you’re trying, we want to know how we can help, and we want to know that you’re not playing a shell game. . . . This would all be a lot easier if you would just be straight with us.”
(The rest of the article is behind a paywall, but there is a podcast at the WSJ article link. )

[Gwin Ru]

...

... Pfizer Shills Falsely Claim They Can’t Be Sued; Another Psyop To Cover Crimes Against Humanity 17:32

Stew Peters Network
518K followers

1 hour ago

Over and over, you’ll hear people say that we can’t hold big pharma accountable for the damage they’ve caused, because of what our lovely and brave U.S. Congress did. In the PREP Act that they rushed through three years ago, they gave Pfizer and Moderna and all the rest basically total immunity for anything they did.
But this simply isn’t true.

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v226tkq

... wowww! The shills: Dr. Malone and Sasha Latypova...

[Pam]

I am sharing this video, not because it is so different from the myriad of other videos of people falling over dead while out in public, but because it provides a number of the cases that are particularly troubling to me. Almost all of them are not just the now "classic" just fall over and die but most of them are are what for some reason I find even more troubling. Yes, they are falling over and dying but it is the movements the shaking and flinging that go along with that. If you have a clot or cardiac arrest condition you are just going to fall over, maybe stagger a bit. There might be some movement but this is so strange because it obviously involves neurological malfunctioning . They really don't look like any seizure that I am familiar with and yes, you can die from a seizure but it is usually due to a secondary cause like brain damage from the fall. Sometimes I watch these over and over. Not because I am sadistic and enjoy this carnage. There is something so unsettling about these sorts of death that seem to be a every day occurrence. Loosing consciousness, and then the strange neurological twitching and then I presume, death. They appear to be dead.

Not necessarily in this video, I watch the ones where a televised figure dies, I look to see if they are showing signs beforehand and mostly they seem perfectly coherent one second, and the next it is like a switch was turned on.

These are from China and I know we were duped in the beginning as a propaganda scheme but these look genuine. Anyone have any ideas what the neurological aspect could be, these bizarre tremors and then death? I am now becoming suspicious of the nano aspect of this and wonder if this is one of the myriadic ways of death by the injection and possibly more.... foods, aerosol poisoning, all of it.


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Bwo1Vssg1y68

[mountain_jim]

(I have not watched yet, but RFK Jr appeared live on Tucker's show last night to discuss this)

https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/...XN-pS28eF10Pcg

[mountain_jim]

https://en.rattibha.com/thread/1612620099395153920

Guess what 4chan found

euro.who.int

For context: this is the states playbook on how to handle anything that erodes trust in the shots. It even has guides on what to say. Every public statement by a journalist/politician is scripted.





They got something for everyone!



More scripted responses



Courtesy of @PirataHrvata

What happens if a baby dies after being vaccinated? Gaslight!



I had to leave this to run some errands and got distracted going through all the QT. Since 4chan found this, I'll end this with a thought from anon. Thanks to the anons that made this happen. Thank you /pol/

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/...H7yYWJ1AKmVWeA

[Pam]

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
(I have not watched yet, but RFK Jr appeared live on Tucker's show last night to discuss this)

https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/...XN-pS28eF10Pcg

This is wonderful, and I find it encouraging that there are quite a number of twitter members that seem to get it and further understand that this man is a national treasure. RFK Jr could have lived a life of total self indulgence, no need to work , live off the family legacy and money but he is a rare man of being absolutely courageous and moral no matter what. And the fact that he can put this on twitter is all uplifting.

I have to admit, I hold him with great esteem equal to the greats of history likely Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr..

[mountain_jim]

I agree Pam, and spent the time to buy and fully read his books because I so admire his public contributions to humanity.

[jaybee]

.

well.... they have now suspended Andrew Bridgen for writing a tweet saying that the mRNA Covid injections are the biggest crime against humanity since the holocaust.... he has been outspoken and brave and gone where others feared to tread and no amount of huffing and puffing of parliament can deny the truth of the data and growing numbers of dead and injured resulting from their total failure to protect the public -

the comments under the video are all supportive of Andrew Bridgen at the moment...

Tory MP suspended after comparing COVID vaccines with Holocaust(2:48)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=4QV0KzVznZE

Prominent backbencher Andrew Bridgen is no longer a Conservative MP after he compared the COVID vaccine to the Holocaust.


some comments under video...

If he said that the clot shot was like "a 1000 mile train crash", he would have been attacked over slander of British rail. We don't care about the analogy, we care about the truth.

~~~~~~~~~~~~

this time the deaths dont seem to get a daily count and announcement for sky news

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I live in a small town and the people over the last 18 months that have died suddenly aged 50 to 70 is worrying. I never believed conspiracy theories about the vaccine but I do now. No way would I have another jab

~~~~~~~~~~~~~


The truth doesn’t fear investigation…

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

For once a politician telling the truth

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Lots injured by these toxic vaccines

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Neurenberg Convention law prohibits human experimentation without consent.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Absolutely disgusting silencing the truth, this man stood up for everyone one of us.

I have a feeling this could be a turning point of some kind when the dust settles over the next couple of weeks and even though the MPs guilty of putting all their constituents in danger by going along with the whole experimental jab debacle are positively OUTRAGED at the moment - in the privacy of their own minds they will have to consider that Andrew Bridgen is, in fact, right...

[onawah]

CDC Forced to Release V-Safe Data, Excessive Covid Vaccine Injuries Made Public
The Vaccine Reaction
Published January 11, 2023
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2023/...s-made-public/

"Why did it take numerous legal demands, multiple appeals, two lawsuits, in fact, before the CDC finally handed over the V-safe data, which is already de-identified data, for the most part, that they provided just two days ago… a hundred, forty-four million lines of code… that they could’ve provided in a matter of minutes at any point? It’s a great question. Maybe the answer is that now that we have that data and we’ve looked at that data, of the 10 million users within V-safe, 7.7 percent of them had to seek medical care after [Covid] vaccination. That is an incredibly high percentage, it appears to me."

(I couldn't find the embed code for the Rumble video, but this is the link:https://rumble.com/v1mrnsg-after-for...njuries-a.html )