Possibly the clearest face images of Bigfoot to date!

[mojo]

Have followed Sasquatch Ontario for years and believe he has been involved with an authentic Bigfoot habituation case. Recently he posted the clearest face images of Bigfoot ever seen. Perhaps one day we will see even better evidence but check out his newest upload of this possibly amazing capture.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=tYxUQfvzONs

[mojo]

Here is more background story...

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=m4NY4ZMIsLc

[thepainterdoug]

I lightened a screenshot. what do you think?

[seehas]

Posted by thepainterdoug (here)
I lightened a screenshot. what do you think?

i think i know that guy ! sorry couldnt resist

[Sunny-side-up]

Posted by thepainterdoug (here)
I lightened a screenshot. what do you think?

LOL say no more

[Alecs]

I have significant doubts too.

I was expecting a wider mouth, more strong-looking teeth, a more sloped forehead, larger and pointed head, hair that looks less blow dryed, a suggestion of hefty neck and shoulders. As well the vertical forehead ridges look too fixed.

These photos look like a mask on a human.

[thepainterdoug]

Hey all Im just the messenger here . i think it looks like a mask from toys r us. but ya know, Im always open

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

With you there Doug. I can't sit here and say that isn't real. I wasn't there, I don't know. But it's the least convincing Sasquatch image -- posing as the real thing -- that I've ever seen. The Patterson/Gimlin film is still the best IMO.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Q60mSMmhTZU

[mojo]

I can see your points about doubts but Mike the researcher has been at it for ten years it doesn't make sense to put a fake image up after all this time. His archive of evidence includes hair samples, unusual weaving of trees/shelter, trackways, castings and of course audio clips. I watch the Patterson/Gimlin video and there isnt enough evidence to determine face detail but of course it is the standard measure to go by. I would suggest take some time and review his archive and see if it resonates with you.

[seehas]

Posted by mojo (here)
I can see your points about doubts but Mike the researcher has been at it for ten years it doesn't make sense to put a fake image up after all this time. His archive of evidence includes hair samples, unusual weaving of trees/shelter, trackways, castings and of course audio clips. I watch the Patterson/Gimlin video and there isnt enough evidence to determine face detail but of course it is the standard measure to go by. I would suggest take some time and review his archive and see if it resonates with you.

well sometimes truth is stranger than fiction, do you all remember the billy meier picture of semjase? would i say billy meier is a hoaxer? no way

[Ratszinger]

The Planet Of The Apes movie had better costumes than those cheap looking fakes. Sorry but that sure looks like some kind of a cheap stunt. That voice in the beginning wasn't even real either that was some guy not a Bigfoot. A little off topic. Is it just me or does that guy look a whole lot like Patrick Swayze did?