+ Reply to Thread
Page 85 of 109 FirstFirst 1 35 75 85 95 109 LastLast
Results 1,681 to 1,700 of 2178

Thread: Vaccine Crimes

  1. Link to Post #1681
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    24,195
    Thanks
    51,892
    Thanked 130,055 times in 22,640 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    FOIA’d Emails Reveal Highest-Level Leaders at White House, HHS, CDC, NIAID, AAP All Knew COVID Vaccines Linked to Myocarditis, Yet Publicly Covered Up Findings
    October 18, 2023 • by Amy Kelly

    (hyperlinks in the article not embedded here)\

    "DailyClout received the third, 131-page release of documents from Attorney Edward Berkovich’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The FOIA request stated: “I request emails sent by and received by Dr. Rochelle P. Walensky, Sherri A. Berger, and Kevin Griffis (all of whom are CDC personnel) on dates beginning February 1, 2021 through May 31, 2021, containing the word myocarditis.” Astonishingly, the emails reveal that the most senior of leaders, all the way up to the White House, knew about heart damage linked to mRNA vaccines yet colluded behind the scenes to conceal this side effect from the American people.

    Approximately 60% of the production is redacted. In a letter that accompanied the documents, the HHS FOIA office gave its reasoning:

    “The Office of the Secretary [of HHS] conducted review 94 pages of responsive records. After a careful review of these pages, I am releasing 52 pages, we have found that it is reasonably foreseeable that disclosure would harm an interest protected by one or more of the exemptions to the FOIA’s general rule of disclosure and/or that disclosure is prohibited by law; therefore I have determined to withhold portions of three pages, pursuant to Exemption (b (6) of FOIA (5 U.S.C. §552).

    Additionally, CDC is withholding portion of 37 pages, to include 37 pages in their entirety pursuant to Exemptions (b)(5) and (b)(6) of FOIA (5 U.S.C. §552). Exemption (b)(5) protects inter-agency or intra-agency memoranda or letters which would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency. This exemption protects documents that would be covered by any privilege an agency could assert in a civil proceeding. These privileges include, among others, the deliberative process privilege, the attorney-client privilege, and the attorney work-product privilege. In this instance, the process privilege applies.

    FOIA exemption (b)(6) permits a federal agency to withhold information and records about individuals in ‘personnel and medical files and similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.’ The definition of ‘similar files’ has historically been broadly interpreted to include a wide variety of files, and the United States Supreme Court has held that Congress intended the term ‘similar files’ to be interpreted broadly, rather than narrowly. I have analyzed these records and find they meet the threshold requirement of this exemption. Additionally, I have reviewed and weighed the public interest in disclosure of this information against the privacy interest in nondisclosure and found that the privacy interest outweighs the public’s interest in disclosure.”

    In the heavily redacted Health and Human Services (HHS) emails from March 2, 2021, through May 28, 2021, we see:

    Ian Sams, former HHS Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, COVID Response and current Special Assistant to the President and Senior Advisor and Spokesman for the White House; Abbigail Tumpey, then Associate Director for Communication Science for CDC’s Public Health Infrastructure; Rochelle Walensky, MD, CDC Director; and Dana Meaney-Delman, MD, CDC Lead, Maternal Immunization and CDC Chief of Infant Outcomes Monitoring Research and Prevention Branch, Fellow of the American College of Gynecology working together to craft a “Myocarditis Email” that minimizes the relationship between COVID mRNA vaccines and myocarditis.
    A template for “Weekly Cabinet Affairs Report” with the heading “MEMORANDUM FOR THE CABINET SECRETARY.” “Cabinet Affairs” seems to refer to President Joe Biden’s Cabinet, of which HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra is a member. The template mentions “POTUS,” President of the United States, repeatedly, and the section of the template on COVID-19 includes the headings:
    Significant activity for consideration to raise to the attention of POTUS
    Past Week Accomplishments and Setbacks/Obstacles
    Requests for White House Collaboration
    Next Week – Upcoming Events / Tasks /Developments
    Admiral Rachel Levine, MD, Assistant Secretary for Health, HHS, writing to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Dr. Walensky, after speaking with the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Section on Pediatric Cardiology, and questioning the existence of the known link between myocarditis and COVID-19 mRNA vaccines just one day after the CDC published “Myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination” about the link between them.
    Anthony Fauci, MD, then Director of National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); Janet Woodcock, MD, then Acting Commissioner of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and now FDA Principal Deputy Commissioner; Vice Admiral Vivek Murthy, MD, United States Surgeon General; Dr. Levine, Dr. Walensky, David Kessler, MD, Chief Science Officer for COVID-19 Task Force, HHS; Marcella Smith, MD, , COVID-19 Health Equity Task Force Chair; and Loyce Pace, MPH, HHS Assistant Secretary for Global Affairs, with Sean Mccluskie, HHS Chief of Staff; Lisa Barclay, HHS Deputy General Counsel; Ian Sams; Sherri Berger, CDC Deputy Director for Policy, Communications, and Legislative Affairs/Chief Strategy Officer; Patricia Conrad, NIAID Special Assistant to the Acting Director; Julia (Julie) Tierney, JD, Chief of Staff of the FDA; Sarah Boateng, MHA, HHS Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Health; Max Lesko, JD, Chief of Staff, Office of the Surgeon General; White House COVID-19 Response Team; Sherice Perry, then Senior Advisor, COVID-19 Equity Task Force and now White House Senior Advisor to the Director; and Kimberly Espinosa, HHS Deputy Assistant Secretary for Legislation collaborating about a meeting with HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra regarding India where mention(s) of myocarditis is redacted.
    James Baumberger, Senior Director, Federal Advocacy, American Academy of Pediatrics, sending AAP News article, “Pediatricians should report cases of heart inflammation after COVID-19 vaccination,” to the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Health, who forwarded it to the HHS Assistant Secretary for Health and CDC Deputy Director for Policy, Communications, and Legislative Affairs/Chief Strategy Officer.

    In the following email excerpts, you will see that people at the highest levels of the White House, HHS, CDC, NIAID, and AAP knew in early 2021 about the association between COVID mRNA vaccines and myocarditis, crafted messages to downplay the connection between the two, and sometimes outright lied to the public about the causal relationship that they discussed in private about between the shots and heart damage.


    On May 14, 2021, Mr. Sams emailed Ms. Tumpey and Dr. Walensky with the subject, “what do you think about this?” and included an attachment, “Myocarditis_V4.docx.” Dr. Walensky then forwarded it to Dr. Meaney-Delman. The draft/edited email about which they were communicating read:

    “Myocarditis Email

    Subject: For Awareness: Investigating Monitoring Report of Myocarditis After Vaccination

    Good afternoon,

    In recent weeks, there have been reports CDC is aware of rare reports of myocarditis occurring after COVID-19 vaccination, including in Europe, where the EMA recently XXXX. and CDC is aware of these reports and continues to monitor available data investigating these reports.

    Myocarditis is the inflammation of the heart muscle and pericarditis is the inflammation of the lining outside the heart. In both cases, the body’s immune system is causing inflammation in response to an infection or some other trigger. While myocarditis can be serious, it is frequently mild and self-limited.

    As part of COVID-19 vaccine safety efforts, we have been closely monitoring myocarditis/pericarditis in multiple systems, including the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) and the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD).

    To date, there has not been a safety signal identified in either VAERS or VSD. CDC will continue to evaluate reports of myocarditis/pericarditis occurring after COVID-19 vaccination and will share more information as it becomes available. Healthcare providers should consider myocarditis in an evaluation of chest pain after vaccination and report all cases in VAERS.

    CDC continues to recommend COVID-19 vaccination for people 12 years and older.

    Thank you” [p. 112 of FOIA production]

    Here we see those on the email thread downplaye the connection between the vaccines and myocarditis, removed the fact that CDC is aware of myocarditis reports post-vaccination, and emphasized that CDC is “monitoring” instead of “investigating” the reports.


    On March 2, 2021, Michael J. Beach, PhD, CDC Spokesperson and Principal Deputy Incident Manager, CDC COVID-19 Emergency Response, sent an email with the subject “COVID-19: CDC/HHS Product Awareness (Not for S/R)—new publication tomorrow and question on Conditional Sail Order Phase 2A” giving a heads-up to key White House, CDC, and HHS personnel:

    “FYI. Just a note since I just heard a date for a new publication below. We also have the Conditional Sail Order Phase 2A finishing clearance—-I think HHS is pretty familiar with this plan and its journey through OMB [White House Office of Management and Budget] and the Department. Are we OK to post it when ready?…[Redacted]…Others mentioned this week [redacted].”

    Mr. Sams responded with Ms. Berger; Sarah Despres, HHS Counselor for Public Health and Science; Christopher M. Jones, CDC Deputy Director, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; AJ Pearlman, HHS Chief of Staff, COVID-19 Response; Nikki Jo Romanik, then CDC Senior Public Health Analyst and now White House Special Assistant to the President, Deputy Director, and Chief of Staff; and Athalia Christie, Acting Principal Deputy Director, CDC Global Health Center CC’d:

    “I have not heard about the new Sail Order update – what the upshot?”

    Ms. Berger responded minutes later:

    “Jumping in… This was supposed to be discussed at the Principal’s on Monday, but they did not get to it.”

    Ms. Berger then forwarded the email to Ms. Espinosa writing, “Per chat.”

    Dr. Beach responded to Mr. Sams’ “what’s the upshot?” inquiry, but his response is fully redacted.

    AJ Pearlman responded:

    “…Based on Sherri’s note, it sounds like this should be in a holding pattern for now; Sarah and I will discuss and then come back to the group.”

    None of these emails contain the word “myocarditis” in the unredacted sections. However, it must be in the redacted sections for these for these emails to be included as part of this trove.


    On April 27, 2021, Mr. Sams emailed Dr. Walensky with the subject “myocarditis – here is what CDC/FDA responses are right now.” Mr. Sams shared FDA and CDC responses to media about myocarditis:

    “Will try to track DOD update after their meeting…

    Here is FDA response to media on myocarditis:

    To date, FDA and CDC have not seen any new safety signals for myocarditis following administration of any of the authorized COVID-19 vaccines. Post-authorization safety monitoring during the COVID pandemic vaccination program will aim to continuously monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccines to rapidly detect safety problems if they exist. Should any new safety signals be identified by FDA or CDC through their safety surveillance, that information will be communicated to the public.

    And CDC:

    After 220 million doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses administered nationwide and over 5 million doses administered in the Vaccine Safety Datalink, CDC has not detected any indication of a safety problem with myocarditis or pericarditis. At this point there is no safety signal for myocarditis or pericarditis for COVID-19 vaccines in the U.S. monitoring systems.

    Myocarditis/pericarditis is an adverse event of special interest for U.S. vaccine safety surveillance of COVID-19 vaccines and is being closely monitored in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and in CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD). CDC will continue to closely monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccines for myocarditis/pericarditis and other adverse events.” [Bolding and italics are in the original.]


    On May 13, 2021, Ms. O’Connell emailed Dr. Fauci, Dr. Woodcock, Dr. Kessler, Dr. Smith, [redacted], Dr. Murthy, Dr. Levine, Ms. Pace, and Dr. Walensky with Mr. Mccluskie, Ms. Barclay, Mr. Sams, Ms. Berger, Ms. Conrad, Ms. Tierney, Ms. Boateng, Mr. Lesko, Ms. Perry, and Ms. Espinosa CC’d. In the “Agenda: Meeting on India with the Secretary (5/14/2021)” email, Ms. O’Connell wrote:

    “…we’ll use our 10am meeting tomorrow to catch up on India and anything we need to be tracking there. If there is additional time we might use it to discuss today’s announcement on masking. Proposed agenda for tomorrow’s meeting: [redacted].”

    Ms. Berger forwarded the email to Henry Walke, MD, CDC Director of the Office of Readiness and Response, with the subject updated to “Flagging: Agenda: Meeting on India with the Secretary (5/14/2021)”:

    “…I know you will have the Epi in the daily update, anything else you’ve heard about that RW [Rochelle Walensky] should plan to cover?”

    Dr. Walke responded, “Will make sure we have good india [sic] bullets. [Redacted] will have an update later tonight or am.”

    “Myocarditis” does not appear in the unredacted sections of these emails and, therefore, must be in the redacted sections.


    On May 23, 2021, Ms. Despres emailed Ms. Berger, Mr. Sams, Ms. O’Connell, and Stephen Cha, Counselor to HHS Secretary Becerra, with the subject, “HAN [Health Alert Network] on myocarditis”:

    “We just got a heads up from FDA that CDC is issuing a HAN on myocarditis/mRNA vaccines. I know that Ian is already looped in but if you could make sure we see the HAN when it goes that would be great. Would also love to know timing.”

    Ms. Berger added Ms. Tumpey and Dr. Schuchat to the thread. Dr. Schuchat responded:

    “Will follow up but believe the aim was for early this week. Just targeting Emergency departments rather than broad advisory.” In a separate email she wrote, “It won’t be tomorrow. Still working this through.”


    On May 24, 2021, Ms. Berger emailed Ms. O’Connell, with Dr. Walensky CC’d, and a subject of “Today’s 1:30PM”:

    “RW [Rochelle Walensky] will plan to also cover myocarditis.”

    Though the myocarditis risk had been revealed to senior public health leaders, it was not until three days later that the CDC issued a public statement on it.


    Also on May 24, 2021, Perrie Briskin, Senior Advisor the Chief of Staff at HHS, emailed a very long list of HHS, HRSA, FDA, and IHS employees, including Dr. Woodcock and Dr. Levine with the subject, “Weekly Cabinet Affairs Report – New Template and Guidance”:

    “We have received the below guidance and update [sic] template attached from Cabinet Affairs.” [Bold added.]

    The email showed a template for updating the Cabinet Secretary. Cabinet Affairs seems to refer to President Joe Biden’s Cabinet. The section of the template on COVID-19 included the headings:

    Significant activity for consideration to raise to the attention of POTUS
    Past Week Accomplishments and Setbacks/Obstacles
    Requests for White House Collaboration
    Next Week – Upcoming Events / Tasks /Developments
    Excerpts provided below:





    On May 25, 2021, James Baumberger, Senior Director, Federal Advocacy, American Academy of Pediatrics, sent an article titled, “Pediatricians should report cases of heart inflammation after COVID-19 vaccination,” from AAP News, to Ms. Boateng:

    “I wanted you to see this AAP News article that was recently published and available to AAP members.”

    Ms. Boateng forwards it to Dr. Levine and Ms. Berger.

    Also on May 25, 2021, Dr. Levine emailed Dr. Walensky with the subject, “Meeting with Pediatric Cardiologists”:

    “I met with the pediatric cardiologists form the American Academy of Pediatrics. They confirmed what we had been discussing in regards to case of myocarditis. The cases are infrequent and mild and seem to resolve without treatment. We discussed their thoughts about the evaluation process with noninvasive studies. They will check on the experiences of others in the field throughout the country. I am arranging a meeting with them including your staff from CDC and staff from the FDA this week. In addition, I have a call with Paul Offit from CHOP [Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia] tomorrow to gather his thoughts. I was on a call with [Secretary Xavier] Bechara and the state and local health officials today as well. They articulated that they would appreciate an update if an official announcement would be forthcoming from the CDC about the cases.” [Bold added.]

    Dr. Walensky responded, “We don’t yet have a ton more to share but I do know the SHOs are interested in being looped in…I’ve never met Paul – just an admirer from afar😊. I’m here to help and really grateful for all your [sic] are doing.”


    Also on May 25, 2021, Kerry Caudwell, Senior Policy Analyst, CDC/Office of the Chief of Staff, emailed Ms. Berger and Tiffany Brown, then CDC Deputy Chief of Staff, with the subject, “FOR REVIEW; CDC Cabinet Secretary Weekly Report for May 25 – updated” and the attachments, “Template_Agency Weekly Report_5_24_21.docx” and “CDC Cabinet Secretary Weekly Report for May 25, 2021 v2.docx.” She indicated that Ms. Berger and Ms. Brown needed to review the attachments and give input to HHS that day:

    “The attachment reflects the template updates that were received from HHS last night (see email below and attachment). Revisions include: [redacted].”

    The attached, 10-page CDC Cabinet Secretary Weekly Report for May 25, 2021, is full redacted.

    Ms. Brown replied to Ms. Caudwell with “Flag Item: [redacted].” [Bold in the original.]

    Ms. Caudwell emailed Clare Pierce-Wrobel, Senior Advisor to the Chief of Staff, HHS Office of the Secretary, and Ms. Briskin with the subject, “CDC Cabinet Secretary Weekly Report for May 25,” and an attachment, “CDC Secretary Weekly Report for May 25, 2021.docx.”

    The attachment is fully redacted.

    In these emails we see high-level HHS personnel sending a weekly report that includes references to myocarditis for review during President Biden’s weekly Cabinet meeting.

    On May 26, 2021, Ms. Berger emailed Ms. Tumpey, Ms. Boateng, and Ms. O’Connell with Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, COVID CDC Response Role: Senior Lead, Equity in COVID Data and Engagement and Director of CDC Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, and Dr. Schuchat CC’d, with the subject, “HAN [Health Action Network] Update” and designation of “Importance: High.” Ms. Berger wrote:

    “Abbigail is tracking this, including rollout plans – as of 1AM, it is not ready to go. I am letting her know Dawn [O’Connell] and Sarah [Boateng] need an early heads up and to see the language beforehand. Also, per chat, the SHOs [Senior Health Officers?] requested a heads up (even if it is an hour before).”

    In response, Dr. Levine emailed Ms. Berger with the subject “HAN” asking to see the HAN before it is final. Dr. Levine wrote:

    “…it would be great if we could give a heads-up to the group that Dr. Choucair speaks to on [sic] Tuesdays which includes ASTHO [Association of State and Territorial Health Officials] before it goes live.” Dr. Choucair likely refers to Dr. Wassim Choucair of the Heart & Rhythm Institute in San Antonio.

    Minutes later, Ms. Berger responded:

    “…initial draft is with Rochelle now, flagging that you’d like to review as well. Abbigail will work with the CDC STLT [state, tribal, local, and territorial health departments] task force to set up a SHO call before it goes out to share the embargoed update with them via telephone.” Embargoed indicates it is off limits to the media.

    Ms. Tumpey replied:

    “We are still discussing the strategy on this topic. However, after discussions internally and with FDA, we will likely [redacted]. Our team is on a call with the FDA now. I will share the messaging shortly.”

    This email thread demonstrates that these leaders carefully constructed so-called messaging and that they communicated “embargoed” updates via telephone rather than on email. This is a common approach when officials do not wish to leave a paper trail.

    On May 27, 2021, Ms. Tumpey emailed Dr. Levine; Ms. O’Connell; Ms. Boateng; Mr. Sams; Ms. Roido; Ms. Tierney; Adam Beckman, Special Advisor, U.S. Surgeon General; Alexandria Phillips, Communications Director, U.S. Surgeon General; Ms. Berger; Stephanie Caccomo, FDA Media Relations Director; and Dr. Walensky with the subject, “Myocarditis Materials” and the attachments, “Web Content-Myocarditis-Cliean.docx,” “Myocarditis Email to Clinicians.docx,” Myocarditis Clinical Considerations,docx,” and “Reactive on Myocarditis and Tough QA_Clean.docx.” The email addressed “Dr. Levine and Dawn”:

    “Attached are the pieces of the myocarditis content that are still in final review at the CDC. They include:

    Web content for consumers
    Email to clinicians
    Clinical considerations (web content)
    Reactive media statement and tough Q/A.”
    The attachments are not included with this tranche of emails.

    Sherri Berger responded:

    “FYI – there is a 1230PM call with STLT and core PH [public health] partners and we were planning to give an EMBARGOED heads up.” Again, EMBARGOED indicates it is off limits to the media.

    Emails arranged for Dr. Levine to be on the 12:30PM call as a panelist.

    Ms. O’Connell emailed Ms. Tumpey, Ms. Boateng, Mr. Sams, Ms. Roido, Ms. Tierney, Mr. Beckman, Ms. Phillips, Ms. Berger, Ms. Caccomo, and Dr. Walensky asking if they “all will go at 1?”

    Ms. Tumpey responded:

    “We were planning to post this between 2-3pm. Received some additional comments/questions from Courtney Rowe [White House Director of Strategic Communications and Engagement, COVID-19 Response Team] that I’m addressing. Any additional concerns?”

    Ms. Tumpey then emailed Dr. Levine:

    “This is [sic] content posted. Public content: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...ocarditis.html. Clinical considerations: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-1...arditis.html.”

    This email thread shows that there is a large, coordinated effort at the highest levels to create and get sign-off on myocarditis-related “public content” before it goes live.


    On May 28, 2021, Dr. Levine emailed Dr. Walensky with Ms. Boateng CC’d and with the subject “AAP”:

    “Rochelle, Thank you for your call. I checked and the AAP did come out with guidance referencing the CDC recommendations and did emphasize continued vaccinations. https://publications.aap.org/news/20...uidance-052721 I can still check with them about the exercise recommendations for adolescents with mild myocarditis. Please give me your thoughts.” [Emphasis added.] The post at that link is no longer available.

    Dr. Walensky responded:

    “I’m so grateful for your help here. So, I’m deep in the weeds (and perhaps too much so) but I’d like to understand how they are thinking about this. [Redacted.] Recommendations [redacted].”

    Dr. Levine replied:

    “I am speaking with the AAP and the Pediatric Cardiologists about these issues tomorrow at 9 am. I will keep you up to date.” [Emphasis added.]

    The correspondence continues the next day when Dr. Levine wrote:

    “We just got off the phone with the AAP and the Section on Pediatric Cardiology and reviewed these questions. They confirmed the validity and importance of the guidelines. Certainly, myocarditis with Covid 19 is uncommon and even more uncommon with the vaccines – if it is associated at all with the vaccines. However, if myocarditis is diagnosed, with corroborating labs, EKG, echo etc., then they would follow the AHA [American Heart Association] class 1 guidelines as you noted below. They would recommend 3-6 months of limitations on sports as outlined depending on the severity of the case. They highlighted the significant risks that can be associated with adolescent myocarditis and the collaboration of primary care and the pediatric cardiology in working with the young person and the families. In summary, they all felt that the treatment had to be consistent with the recommendations as noted below no matter the precipitating cause.” [Emphasis added.]

    Later that day, Dr. Levine emailed Dr. Walensky thanking her for her call and giving her the link – https://publications.aap.org/news/20...uidance-052721 [now dead] – to AAP’s recommendations. Dr. Walensky emailed Dr. Levine back minutes later, but her comments to Dr. Levine are redacted.

    We see here that CDC, HHS, and the other agencies cited above told the public that adolescent myocarditis linked to the mRNA vaccines is “mild” in spite of the fact that the AAP highlighted to Dr. Levine that there “significant risks” associated with teen myocarditis. Unbelievably, the AAP, along with the these public health agencies, continued publicly to recommend COVID mRNA vaccinations for minors despite the significant heart damage risks that they flagged in private communications.

    This stunning trove of emails in which public officials are discussing serious harms to teenagers and others dramatically contrasts with the public statements Dr. Walensky and others in these emails made downplaying any risk in messages they sent publicly to parents.

    DailyClout previously reported on the initial 472-page production from that FOIA on August 29, 2023, as well as the second, 46-page production. Please see the new emails below. "

    (More at the link: https://dailyclout.io/foiad-emails-r...d-up-findings/ )
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  2. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (29th October 2023), Dennis Leahy (26th October 2023), Ewan (28th October 2023), fifi (28th October 2023), Harmony (26th October 2023), mountain_jim (27th October 2023), Reinhard (25th October 2023), Sunny (25th October 2023)

  3. Link to Post #1682
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    24,195
    Thanks
    51,892
    Thanked 130,055 times in 22,640 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    How Pfizer Hid Nearly 80% of COVID Vaccine Trial Deaths From Regulators
    By Angelo DePalma,Ph.D.
    10/27/23
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...tm_id=20231027

    "According to an analysis, published this month in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial data, the vaccine makers hid fatality data from regulators in order to qualify for Emergency Use Authorization.

    Pfizer-BioNTech delayed reporting vaccine-associated deaths among BNT162b2 clinical trial participants until after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the product.

    The vaccine makers also failed to account for a large number of subjects who dropped out of the trial.

    Together, these strategies kept regulators and the public ignorant of a 3.7-fold increase in cardiac deaths among subjects who received the vaccine, according to analysis in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research.

    The authors of the paper described it as a “forensic analysis,” defined by the U.S. National Institute for Standards and Technology as “the use of scientific methods or expertise to investigate crimes or examine evidence that might be presented in a court of law.”

    What the analysis shows

    Corinne Michels, Ph.D., retired distinguished professor of biology at Queens College, New York, led the DailyClout Pfizer/BioNTech Documents Investigations Team on what the authors claim was the first independent examination of original data from the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2) clinical trial.

    Investigators looked at each of the 38 deaths occurring between July 27, 2020, the start of phase 2/3 of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine trial, and March 13, 2020, the end date culminating in Pfizer-BioNTech’s 6-month interim report.

    This trial phase involved 44,060 subjects. Half received a dose of BNT162b2, half got a placebo consisting of an inactive sterile salt solution.

    The trial was unusual because at week 20 after the FDA issued the EUA for the vaccine, trial subjects in the placebo group were allowed to switch to the vaccinated group and receive their first BNT162b2 shot.

    Switching from the placebo to the vaccinated group — or “unblinding” — normally occurs when the benefit of the drug is so great that not treating subjects becomes unethical. For example, investigators might consider unblinding a cancer trial if at some point all untreated patients deteriorated or died but all treated patients improved.

    Unblinding conditions may be specified in the study design, but they usually involve input or review from medical ethicists.

    Of 20,794 unblinded placebo subjects in the Pfizer trial, 19,685 received at least one dose of BNT162b2.

    Normally the decision to unblind a vaccine trial would be based on the product’s safety and effectiveness in reaching certain endpoints or objectives. Endpoints for a drug to prevent viral infections might be a positive test or self-reported COVID-19 illness (the “case” numbers that drove much of COVID-19 policy), illness requiring hospitalization or death.

    But, perhaps unexpectedly, after 33 weeks the data revealed no significant difference between deaths in the vaccinated and placebo groups for the initial 20-week placebo-controlled portion of the trial.

    After week 20, after most former placebo subjects had received the vaccine, deaths among those in the vaccine group continued unabated.

    The authors revealed “inconsistencies” between data presented in Pfizer-BioNTech’s 6-month interim report and subsequent publications by Pfizer-BioNTech trial site administrators:

    “Most importantly, we found evidence of an over 3.7-fold increase in the number of deaths due to cardiac events in the BNT162b2 vaccinated individuals compared to those who received only the placebo.”

    This means that 79% of relevant deaths were not recorded in time to be included in Pfizer’s regulatory paperwork.

    By not including relevant subject deaths in the case report, Pfizer obscured cardiac adverse event signals, allowing the EUA to proceed unchallenged.

    How did Pfizer get around legal, ethical obligations?

    The Pfizer-BioNTech data, obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, uncovered four additional deaths in the vaccine group and one more in the placebo group — but Pfizer failed to include these data in their FDA submission despite an explicit study design requirement to do so.

    These data, and how they differ from what Pfizer-BioNTech reported in their applications, are summarized in Table 3 of Michels’ study.

    One case involved a 63-year-old woman who died 41 days after receiving the shot, but whose death only entered the data pool 37 days later. Another was a 58-year-old woman whose death 72 days after vaccination went unreported for 26 days.

    Had Pfizer-BioNTech met their legal and ethical obligation to report all serious adverse events their data would have shown equal deaths in placebo and vaccine groups — which would have shown no clear benefit for the vaccine.

    How were they able to skirt those obligations?

    For one, they were able to hide behind the the 2005 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, which provided an almost impenetrable liability shield for vaccine manufacturers for “medical countermeasures” in response to any “public health emergency.”

    Second, because COVID-19 was viewed as a national health emergency, regulators abandoned the established, patient-centered, safety-based approval process requiring years of preclinical animal testing — and Pfizer-BioNTech unsurprisingly went along.

    Michels also raised issues regarding total death reports and their timing.

    Since the death total from both study groups, 38, appeared “surprisingly low” to study authors — particularly during a pandemic — they undertook their own analysis based on population mortality expectations at the time.

    Assuming that age-adjusted death rates for the study subjects were similar to those of the general population, they estimated that 222 subjects should have died from July 27, 2020, to March 13, 2021. The reported number, 38, is just 18% of the expected number.

    Michels explained this by the large number, 4.2% of “discontinued subjects.” The most concerning of these were subjects “lost to follow-up,” which means missing scheduled visits or other required activities.

    Pfizer-BioNTech tried to reach these subjects via phone, certified mail or through their emergency contact but despite their efforts could not account for 395 subjects who had dropped out.

    The authors wrote:

    “These are not insignificant numbers and could easily account for the low number of deaths reported in this safety period of the trial. Given the importance of knowing the status of each trial subject, there should have been greater effort to locate these individuals.

    “Additionally, Pfizer/BioNTech was responsible for oversight of the trial sites. Sites with excessive numbers of lost to follow-up should have been evaluated for performance.”

    Michels was also concerned over how certain trial centers had many dropped-out subjects while others had none or just a few.

    Ninety-six of 153 trial sites (63%) reported 0 or 1 subjects lost to follow-up and 34 (22%) reported 2-5 dropouts. But four sites reported more than 20 subjects lost to follow-up, amounting to about 5% of all trial subjects.

    Since the vaccine makers were responsible for trial site oversight, the authors wrote, “Sites with excessive numbers of lost to follow-up should have been evaluated for performance.”

    Finally, based on the data, it appears Pfizer-BioNTech was in no hurry to enter death reports before the EUA submission deadline, particularly for the BNT162b2 group.

    Of the 38 reported deaths only one case was added on the day the subject died. Delays of 20+ and 30+ days were common.

    One death took 72 days to find its way into the database, and all were entered as occurring on the reporting day, not on the actual date of death.

    Of the eight subjects in the vaccine group that should have been reported by Dec. 10, 2020, the EUA application cutoff, the average reporting delay was 17.5 days for subjects in the vaccine group, but just 5.9 days for deaths among subjects in the placebo group."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  4. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (29th October 2023), Dennis Leahy (28th October 2023), Ewan (28th October 2023), fifi (28th October 2023), Harmony (28th October 2023), mountain_jim (28th October 2023), Sunny (28th October 2023)

  5. Link to Post #1683
    United States Avalon Member Dennis Leahy's Avatar
    Join Date
    14th January 2011
    Location
    North Carolina
    Language
    English
    Age
    71
    Posts
    6,865
    Thanks
    48,684
    Thanked 50,118 times in 5,941 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    I watched a new Dr. Joseph Campbell video today, and I see once again he slips and mentions that the efficacy of the vaccines was short lived, and then points out all the boosters to underscore his point.

    I wrote to Dr. Meryl Nass and pointed out to her that she did the same thing - expressed that the vaccine had efficacy, but that it was short lived. I asked her to explain by what metric she was measuring "efficacy."

    The vaccine has zero efficacy as an immunization against Covid-19. Zero!


    I saw a long (and kind of boring) interview with a lawyer that, among other things, talked about a lawsuit brought about by a group of I think 8 people, which got whittled down to one guy, regarding forced/coerced Covid-19 vaccines. The lawyer talked about what specifically the court ruled on, and they cited a very old case from the 1800s regarding a mandated vaccine, and that case came down to the percentage of deaths in the vaccinated versus un-vaccinated groups. Not efficacy in terms of the immunization providing immunity or not, and not efficacy in terms of preventing transmission or not, but statistical deaths. They ruled, as the court had in the old 1800's case, that the statistic proved efficacy.

    Pfizer did the same thing with "safe and effective", conflating their bogus death statistic as if it was immunization efficacy.

    We know the Covid-19 mRNA vaccines do not prevent, nor even reduce the chance of catching Covid-19. It's the "immunization that provides zero immunity", but Pfizer cleverly marketed it as having a very high efficacy for their vaccine in terms of percentage of deaths from Covid-19. (In their lies, presented as testing results, but see Onawah's post just above this.) But the point is, the government and media were allowed to use Pfizer's fake results declaring high efficacy, and conflate that into promoting that the vaccine offered protection, immunity from catching and transmitting Covid-19. They still never admitted that it's the "immunization" that does not immunize, because why the hell would vaccine passports and coercive injections "for everyone else's health" make sense if the shot doesn't offer any immunity?

    It is incorrect - it is medical misinformation - to state that the Covid-19 injection had a short-lived efficacy, when the truth is it had and has zero efficacy against infection and transmission (which is what it was conflated to mean.)


  6. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Dennis Leahy For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (29th October 2023), Delight (28th October 2023), Ewan (28th October 2023), fifi (29th October 2023), Harmony (28th October 2023), mountain_jim (28th October 2023), onawah (28th October 2023), Reinhard (28th October 2023), shaberon (29th October 2023)

  7. Link to Post #1684
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    24,195
    Thanks
    51,892
    Thanked 130,055 times in 22,640 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Not only did it have zero efficacy, it had a lot of very deadly ingredients that will slowy kill off a large part of the global population and/or reduce them to mind controlled slaves of the Deep State, if they get their way.

    Quote Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)

    It is incorrect - it is medical misinformation - to state that the Covid-19 injection had a short-lived efficacy, when the truth is it had and has zero efficacy against infection and transmission (which is what it was conflated to mean.)
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  8. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (29th October 2023), Dennis Leahy (28th October 2023), Ewan (28th October 2023), fifi (29th October 2023), Harmony (28th October 2023), mountain_jim (28th October 2023), Reinhard (28th October 2023), shaberon (29th October 2023)

  9. Link to Post #1685
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    11,526
    Thanks
    71,477
    Thanked 104,066 times in 11,366 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/171...706625919?s=20



    The Vigilant Fox 🦊

    @VigilantFox
    Germany did a study: they found ZERO healthy children aged 5 to 11 who died of COVID-19.

    On the other hand,
    @MakisMD
    has found 68 children who died unexpectedly after the shot.

    We sacrificed children — and no one's going to jail for it.

    http://vigilantnews.com/post/unexpec...cases-reviewed



    https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/171...251741140?s=20



    https://brownstone.org/articles/well...-ages-5-to-11/
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  10. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (29th October 2023), Dennis Leahy (28th October 2023), fifi (29th October 2023), Harmony (29th October 2023), onawah (30th October 2023), shaberon (29th October 2023)

  11. Link to Post #1686
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    11,526
    Thanks
    71,477
    Thanked 104,066 times in 11,366 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    https://x.com/BenSwann_/status/1717978443747328129?s=20

    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  12. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (29th October 2023), Dennis Leahy (28th October 2023), fifi (29th October 2023), Harmony (29th October 2023), onawah (28th October 2023), s7e6e (6th November 2023), shaberon (29th October 2023), Sue (Ayt) (29th October 2023)

  13. Link to Post #1687
    United States Avalon Member Dennis Leahy's Avatar
    Join Date
    14th January 2011
    Location
    North Carolina
    Language
    English
    Age
    71
    Posts
    6,865
    Thanks
    48,684
    Thanked 50,118 times in 5,941 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    Not only did it have zero efficacy, it had a lot of very deadly ingredients that will slowy kill off a large part of the global population and/or reduce them to mind controlled slaves of the Deep State, if they get their way.

    Quote Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)

    It is incorrect - it is medical misinformation - to state that the Covid-19 injection had a short-lived efficacy, when the truth is it had and has zero efficacy against infection and transmission (which is what it was conflated to mean.)

    The docs that are on our side (truth) have done a good job of exposing the lie that the injections are "safe", but I'm pointing out that at least some of them are unwittingly propping up the "effective" part of the "safe and effective" lie.


  14. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Dennis Leahy For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (29th October 2023), Harmony (29th October 2023), mountain_jim (28th October 2023), onawah (28th October 2023), shaberon (29th October 2023)

  15. Link to Post #1688
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    24,195
    Thanks
    51,892
    Thanked 130,055 times in 22,640 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Understood. It's kind of baffling that so many "experts" are still in the dark, but it may simply be due to unwillingness to face reality.
    Being an expert may not necessarily preclude that weakness...
    Quote Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    Not only did it have zero efficacy, it had a lot of very deadly ingredients that will slowy kill off a large part of the global population and/or reduce them to mind controlled slaves of the Deep State, if they get their way.

    Quote Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)

    It is incorrect - it is medical misinformation - to state that the Covid-19 injection had a short-lived efficacy, when the truth is it had and has zero efficacy against infection and transmission (which is what it was conflated to mean.)

    The docs that are on our side (truth) have done a good job of exposing the lie that the injections are "safe", but I'm pointing out that at least some of them are unwittingly propping up the "effective" part of the "safe and effective" lie.
    Last edited by onawah; 28th October 2023 at 17:03.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  16. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (29th October 2023), Dennis Leahy (6th November 2023), Harmony (29th October 2023), mountain_jim (29th October 2023), Reinhard (30th October 2023), shaberon (29th October 2023), Sue (Ayt) (29th October 2023)

  17. Link to Post #1689
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    1st April 2016
    Posts
    5,599
    Thanks
    27,696
    Thanked 31,656 times in 5,248 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    This cat Najadi has already cut his teeth:


    He sued Swiss president Alain Berset for abusing his office and making false statements on Swiss television regarding COVID-19.

    In 2023, Najadi filed a civil case against Pfizer in New York, alleging harm from the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine.


    He explained NATO expansion to the Tehran Times.


    Note that Berset's page mentions a blackmail case, but not the Covid charge. He has decided not to run for re-election.

    Again if you want to be resourceful you can look up the NY docket and see what works or not in court.

    Some of the, eh, web chat conspiracy ploys are dismissed for No Cause. I looked. They had no cause. If his stuff at least gets in the door, then you can be pretty sure he is not total fluff. Merely wanting someone to be arrested doesn't do much. The above are civil suits that are unlikely to lead to arrests.

    RICO applied to the consortium of swindlers would probably also work, but I am not aware of any charges being applied.



    It is not clear his father was a WEF Founder, but was:


    ...the first Chairman of developing countries gathering at Davos Economic Symposium...

    ...and subsequently assassinated:


    During the investigations, Najadi's son Pascal Najadi, a Swiss citizen based in Moscow said, "My father died for reporting corruption within Malaysia. Here (in Moscow) I feel protected and safe. I can only return to Malaysia once we know who and why."

  18. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to shaberon For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (29th October 2023), Dennis Leahy (6th November 2023), Ewan (30th October 2023), Harmony (29th October 2023), mountain_jim (29th October 2023), onawah (30th October 2023), Reinhard (30th October 2023), Vangelo (29th October 2023)

  19. Link to Post #1690
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    11,526
    Thanks
    71,477
    Thanked 104,066 times in 11,366 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    https://x.com/DavidBCollum/status/17...339110410?s=20



    text

    u3_JP
    Professor Emeritus Yasufumi Murakami of Tokyo University of Science:
    "It is almost certain that vaccines are contaminated with DNA. mRNA vaccines containing the DNA causes turbo cancers."

    Professor Murakami explains the mechanism of turbo cancers:

    The covid vaccines are expected to contain only mRNA. However, it has been proven that the vaccines contain considerable amounts of DNA and other substances that should not be present. There is no doubt about it now.

    DNA can enter human cells very easily, regardless of length, and can get into cells everywhere. When DNA gets in the center of an important gene, the important gene will stop functioning.

    One problem is that the mRNA vaccine of Pfizer contains a promoter sequence of the cancer virus called SV40.

    This sequence could enter the human genome, and awakens and activates dormant carcinogenic genes.

    As a result, the risk of developing cancer increases.

    mRNA vaccines increase the risk of developing cancer while suppressing the immunity. Vaccination increases the risk of developing cancer dramatically compared to the unvaccinated state. The more people get vaccinated, the more people will probably get cancer.

    Vaccines appear to increase the risk of all types of cancers. There is credible information that the number of leukemia cases is on the rise.

    Vaccination causes the promoter sequence of the cancer virus to enter white blood cells and attach to red blood cells everywhere. As a result, more and more leukemia cases are reported.

    A lot of spikes of mRNA are produced. The spikes would be most protected from destruction. Possibly, long spike genes remain intact.

    So, if the long spike genes remain there, gene expression will continue to take place all the time. That is, spikes are generated forever.

    Once the DNA gets into the stem cells, the DNA will keep creating more and more spikes. As a result, IgG4 antibodies are induced.

    The number of spike-producing cells will not decrease, and it becomes impossible to get rid of spike-producing cells. As a results, It becomes normal for spikes to be present in cells. The produced spikes then flow into the bloodstream and cause a variety of health problems.

    So, any vaccine that induces IgG4 is deemed as a defective vaccine, and should no longer be produced.

    Normally, cancer cells are born and grow slowly. However, the vaccine suppresses the immunity, which makes it easier for cancer cells to grow.

    The vaccines cause turbo cancers. Suppression of the immunity is a major factor of turbo cancers.

    The increase in IgG4 antibodies results in suppression of cancer immunity.

    The more DNA the vaccine contains, the more intense the inflammation caused by the vaccine becomes.

    DNA is a foreign substance to the cells. So, DNA causes a severe reaction and kills the immune system of the cells. The more DNA the vaccine contains, the more severe the side effects caused by the vaccine become.

    Vaccines could contain many different impurities, but one possibility could be DNA. In the first place, DNA is something that should not be put into cells of your body.
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  20. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (29th October 2023), Delight (29th October 2023), Dennis Leahy (6th November 2023), Ewan (30th October 2023), fifi (30th October 2023), Harmony (29th October 2023), Jeksey (29th October 2023), onawah (30th October 2023), onevoice (29th October 2023), Reinhard (4th November 2023), Vangelo (30th October 2023)

  21. Link to Post #1691
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    11,526
    Thanks
    71,477
    Thanked 104,066 times in 11,366 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    https://x.com/EmeraldRobinson/status...573746171?s=20

    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  22. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (4th November 2023), Dennis Leahy (6th November 2023), fifi (31st October 2023), Gwin Ru (30th October 2023), Harmony (31st October 2023), Reinhard (4th November 2023), Vangelo (31st October 2023)

  23. Link to Post #1692
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    24,195
    Thanks
    51,892
    Thanked 130,055 times in 22,640 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    The Document Making World Leaders Tremble
    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    Blacklisting and Censorship Violates Freedom of Thought, Speech and Conscience
    The Document Making World Leaders Tremble

    Analysis by Barbara Loe Fisher
    November 01, 2023
    https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...rid=1953474032

    https://media.mercola.com/ImageServe...orship-pdf.pdf

    "STORY AT-A-GLANCE
    This is a commentary about a special report that was researched and written on the systematic abuse of parents with vaccine injured children and the silencing of information published by NVIC
    Entitled “The Silencing of Barbara Loe Fisher and the National Vaccine Information Center in the Digital Public Square: A Violation of Freedom of Thought, Speech and Conscience,” the report is anchored with more than 300 live linked references
    In my report, I take the reader on a chronological step-by-step journey from 1982 through 2023, giving an overview of the history of the vaccine safety and informed consent movement in America against the backdrop of the creation of a global mass vaccination infrastructure facilitated by public-private business partnerships encouraged and funded by Congress
    I have connected the dots so the reader can appreciate the scope and influence of the great wealth and political power held by those who have built the spider web of a global infrastructure institutionalizing censorship of freedom of thought, speech and conscience about vaccination and health, especially in the new digital public square
    Please read my report and share it with everyone you know. Join NVIC’s mission and take action to educate your friends, family and community about vaccination, health and autonomy

    Freedom of thought, speech and conscience are inalienable natural1 and civil rights recognized in America and in countries where respect for autonomy2 and protection of bodily integrity3,4,5 places limits on the power of the state. Under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, Americans have the legal right to peacefully dissent and "petition the Government for a redress of grievances."6

    The freedom to use our intelligence and follow our conscience7,8,9 is absolute when we make a decision that involves taking a risk of injury or death for ourselves or on behalf of our minor child,10 and the freedom to speak in the digital public square about what that means should be absolute as well.

    This is a commentary about a special report I have researched and written on the systematic abuse of parents with vaccine injured children and the silencing of my voice and information published by the charitable National Vaccine Information Center in the digital public square both before and after the declaration of a coronavirus pandemic in 2020. I have submitted the report to the US House Judiciary Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government.11

    Entitled "The Silencing of Barbara Loe Fisher and the National Vaccine Information Center in the Digital Public Square: A Violation of Freedom of Thought, Speech and Conscience," the report is anchored with more than 300 live linked references.12

    It contains information about the collaborative actions taken by government officials, political operatives, corporations, academic and financial institutions, media, philanthropic foundations, and global governmental organizations to target, discredit, discriminate against and censor me and NVIC for our mission since 1982 to prevent vaccine injuries and deaths through public education, and to defend the legal right of Americans to make voluntary decisions about vaccination without being coerced or sanctioned for the decision made.13

    NVIC’s Long Record of Vaccine Safety and Freedom Advocacy Targeted for Censorship
    In researching this report, I was shocked and saddened by the evidence I found to substantiate that I and NVIC have been blacklisted, even though we have a long, transparent credible public record of working responsibly in the U.S. with the federal and state governments, and urging others to do the same.14,15,16,17,18,19

    It is clear that we have been subjected to demonization and sanctions because for four decades we have exercised our right to dissent and criticize the safety and effectiveness of government recommended vaccines, and we have asked federal health officials to fill in vaccine safety science knowledge gaps, and we have worked in the states to reform U.S. public health policies and vaccine laws.20

    I spent three months researching and writing this report because I wanted to understand who, what, when, how, and why NVIC was ghosted on the Internet and my voice was silenced.

    While we were being demonized and our presence on the Internet was slowly being suppressed — particularly between 2009 and 2019 — which was followed by de-platforming from four major social media platforms and Pay Pal in 2021,21,22,23 I and NVIC’s staff and volunteers were so busy trying to deal with the blocking of public access to our information that we did not have time to stop and analyze exactly who was responsible.

    We poured all of our resources into educating and empowering Americans at the grassroots level in support of the legal right to make informed and voluntary decisions about vaccination.24,25

    Access Report:https://www.nvic.org/cms/NVIC/media/...orship-Rpt.pdf

    The decades of grassroots education and advocacy that NVIC has performed, particularly at the state level between 2010 and 2020 through the online NVIC Advocacy Portal, culminated in a national rejection of proposed COVID vaccine mandate bills for children to attend school in America.26

    All 50 state legislatures refused to mandate the federally recommended COVID-19 vaccine for children as a condition of receiving a private or public school education, even though the government mandated the vaccine for federal employees and large private corporations as a condition of employment.27

    It is an historic milestone in the history of state-based grassroots advocacy that no legislature in America forced parents to choose between denying their children a school education or injecting them with a biological product recommended by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a product which has proven to be highly reactive and unreliable in preventing infection and transmission.28,29,30,31

    The Rise of the Censorship/Disinformation Industrial Complex
    In my report, I take the reader on a chronological step-by-step journey from 1982 through 2023, giving an overview of the history of the vaccine safety and informed consent movement in America against the backdrop of the creation of a global mass vaccination infrastructure facilitated by public-private business partnerships encouraged and funded by Congress.32

    I describe the major players who, for the past decade especially, have sought to block online conversations about vaccination that do not conform with government and World Health Organization policy, and have used public opposition to vaccine mandates as a political tool to help build what is being aptly characterized as the "Censorship Industrial Complex" or the "Disinformation Industrial Complex."33,34,35,36,37,38

    In the early 1980s, parents of DPT vaccine injured children went head-to-head with the mandatory vaccination lobby led by the pharmaceutical industry, public health and medical trade, and we managed to secure historic acknowledgement in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 that vaccine safety should be made a national priority.39,40

    That accomplishment was based on the fact that federally licensed and recommended vaccines for children, which are mandated by states, can and do injure and kill a minority of them.41

    Acknowledgement of that inconvenient truth in the late 20th century, a truth still often denied by those conducting the business of vaccination, planted the first seeds that grew into a national and international Censorship Industrial Complex in the 21st century, which targets not only "vaccine hesitancy," but a cross-section of political, economic, cultural value and belief issues.

    Connecting the Dots on the Silencing of Vaccine Policy and Law Critics in the Digital Public Square
    In this report, I have told the story from an eyewitness perspective of a mother whose child was brain injured by a crude pertussis vaccine in 1980 that could have been made safer;42 and as co-founder of a charity that worked for 14 years to get a less reactive pertussis vaccine licensed for America’s babies in 1996;43,44 and as the author of referenced articles and books; public presentations and television debates; congressional and state legislature testimony; and video commentaries that have been posted on NVIC.org’s four websites and in other forums on the Internet since 1995.45

    I have connected the dots so the reader can appreciate the scope and influence of the great wealth and political power held by those who have built the spider web of a global infrastructure institutionalizing censorship of freedom of thought, speech and conscience about vaccination and health, especially in the new digital public square.

    I provide readers with live links to papers, articles and documents using language to denigrate individuals and groups that criticize vaccine policy and law that were published by or under the guidance of individuals associated with the United Nations,46,47,48,49,50 U.S. Department of Homeland Security,51,52,53,54 Director of National Intelligence,55 Department of State,56 Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation;57 Department of Defense;58 Department of Health and Human Services;59,60,61 the US Surgeon General,62 and other government agencies.

    There are links to published evidence that big philanthropic foundations and think tanks, such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,63,64,65 Rockefeller Foundation,66 Bloomberg Philanthropies,67 World Economic Forum68 and Aspen Institute,69 as well as organizations representing Big Pharma, like the Sabin Vaccine institute70 and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance,71,72,73 have funded and collaborated with universities and government agencies and for-profit media companies like NewsGuard74,75,76,77 to urge censorship of free speech.

    There are live links to reports by a foreign political operative, Imran Ahmed, who founded the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) in the United Kingdom,78 and has spread false information and engaged in defamatory attacks on me, NVIC and a number of speakers, who presented at NVIC’s Fifth International Public Conference on Vaccination: Protecting Health and Autonomy in the 21st Century, that was held online in October 2020.79,80

    He created the first blacklist of individuals and organizations like NVIC targeted for defunding and elimination from Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and You Tube,81,82,83,84,85 a blacklist that was used by government officials and media outlets to put pressure on social media companies to silence my voice and NVIC’s presence on the Internet.86,87,88,89,90,91

    In my report, there are live links to medical literature and media articles in which professors at major universities and medical organizations hurl abuse at parents of vaccine injured children and call for those they label "anti-vaxxers" to have their freedom of speech taken away, including professors and doctors affiliated with Johns Hopkins University,92,93 University of Pennsylvania,94,95,96 Emory University,97 Baylor University,98,99 New York University,100,101 Stanford University,102,103 Brown University,104 University of Washington,105 University of California,106 Mayo Clinic,107 George Washington University,108 Harvard University,109 and more.110,111,112

    Some have called for physicians sharing information with patients about vaccine risks and failures that does not conform with government policy to lose their medical licenses,113,114 and for Americans who decline vaccines for themselves or their children to be sued and fined and arrested.115,116

    When I finished and reviewed the report, I thought to myself: it reads like a crime novel. That is because the blacklisting and censorship of ordinary Americans, who are treated like enemies of the state simply because they exercise freedom of thought, speech and conscience, is a crime that should never have happened.117,118,119

    NVIC Struggling to Overcome Blacklisting, Needs Help
    Today, NVIC is struggling to survive. We are doing everything we can to stay on course and connect with parents desperately searching for information they need to protect their children from harm, information we did not have when we were young parents and had been kept in the dark by the very same players who are operating the global Public Health Empire and Censorship Industrial Complex today.

    We need your help because people tell us over and over again, that when they conduct online searches, it is almost impossible to find NVIC.org, a website we established in 1995 and today is the oldest and largest consumer operated website on the Internet publishing information about vaccines and diseases.

    They tell us they don’t know about the NVIC Advocacy Portal, a free online communications network that helps residents of every state work to protect their legal right to make vaccine choices for themselves and their children; and to protect their medical privacy from being violated in electronic vaccine tracking systems; and to protect their right to hold a job without getting every government recommended vaccine.

    Most people don’t know that NVIC publishes a digital weekly journal newspaper at TheVaccineReaction.org, which was re-launched online in 2015 after being founded in print published form in 1995.

    And they don’t know they can read descriptions of vaccine reactions filed in the federal vaccine adverse event Reporting System by going to the MedAlerts.org website, a user friendly search engine that NVIC has sponsored since 2006.

    Before being blacklisted, NVIC was in touch with hundreds of thousands of Americans every day on major social media platforms and we had a stable donor base. Now, if anyone shares NVIC’s well referenced vaccine information or talks about vaccine safety concerns on Facebook, Instagram and YouTube, their accounts are in danger of being cancelled so they can’t have conversations with friends and family members online.

    Mothers tell us that, if they ask a doctor a question about vaccine reactions, or want to alter the CDC’s vaccination schedule and give their infants and children fewer vaccines on one day, they are thrown out of the doctor’s office and their children are denied medical care.120

    A lot of people tell us they are afraid that one day, they will be forced to get vaccines they don’t want, or be fired from their jobs, or denied medical insurance or a passport, or blocked from entry to a hospital when they or loved ones become ill — or worse.121

    We all remember what was done to Americans in the name of public health and national security during the COVID19 pandemic emergency declaration. We remember how sick we or someone we cared about felt after suffering a COVID vaccine reaction.122

    Many are still suffering from the long-term effects of those vaccine reactions, just like many of us are still suffering from the long-term effects of having been infected with SARS-CoV-2,123 a mysteriously mutated virus that appears to have leaked from a Chinese biohazard lab that received U.S. federal agency funding.124

    We want to be free to talk about what we think about all of that with our friends, family and colleagues in the virtual public square, which is the First Amendment right of every American. And when we realize our cell phones and computer searches are being secretly monitored by government and Big Tech, and we are blocked from speaking freely on the Internet about health and vaccination issues we care deeply about, we know something is very, very wrong.

    This Shameful Era in US History
    I never imagined that after I had spent more than two decades serving as a consumer member on federal vaccine advisory committees and responsibly participating in public engagement projects, begging government officials to do the science to identify genetic, epigenetic, and other biological high risk factors that make some individuals more vulnerable to suffering vaccine reactions so their lives could be spare, that I would be thanked with overt discrimination and abuse.

    I was devastated to learn that government officials have worked with political operatives, corporations, the media and academic institutions to characterize public conversations about vaccine risks and failures as a threat to national security in order to pejoratively label me and others as "anti-vaxxers," using words like "malignant" and "domestic threat actor," for the purpose of blacklisting and justifying the silencing of our voices in the public square.125,126,127,128

    This is not the America my parents and I grew up in. It is not the America I want my children and grandchildren to grow up in. And I am not alone.

    I know that my life’s work and the mission of NVIC in memory of the vaccine injured is — and has always been — just. And I know the truth will shine bright and clear when all the evidence about this shameful era in U.S. history is revealed by others with access to far more information than I have.129

    In the meantime, I and the staff and volunteers at NVIC will not be silent and surrender to the Censorship Industrial Complex. As we have done for 41 years, we will stand and defend the natural right of all Americans to freely choose when and for what reason we are willing to risk our life or the life of our minor child without being punished by the state.

    Because if the state can tag, track down and force individuals against their will to be injected with biologicals of known and unknown toxicity today, then there will be no limit on which individual freedoms the state can take away in the name of the greater good tomorrow.

    Please read my report and share it with everyone you know. Join NVIC’s mission and take action to educate your friends, family and community about vaccination, health and autonomy. Please make a donation to NVIC during this 14th Annual Vaccine Awareness Week.

    During the COVID pandemic, the government collaborated with Big Pharma, medical trade groups and businesses to promote COVID shot mandates. Even worse, our right to free speech came under attack and owners of social media platforms were told to censor online conversations about vaccine risks and failures.

    That censorship continues online today as only medical policy approved and recommended by government health officials and the World Health Organization (WHO) is allowed to be posted or discussed.

    Compounding the problem is the recommendation for everyone to get more and more COVID booster shots, regardless of lack of valid clinical testing to scientifically demonstrate safety or effectiveness. It is clear that Big Pharma lobbyists and their partners won’t stop until they accomplish their goal — laws that force every American to get every government-recommended vaccine (and every biological product they label a “vaccine”).

    Time is of the essence. It is critical you act now to protect your legal right to make informed, voluntary vaccine choices.

    Thankfully, for more than 40 years, the NVIC, a nonprofit charity advocating for vaccine safety and informed consent rights, has been providing the public with independent, well-referenced information on vaccination, health and autonomy. NVIC operates four websites:

    NVIC.org, established in 1995, is the oldest consumer-operated website publishing information on vaccines and diseases on the internet;
    NVICAdvocacy.org, launched in 2010, advocates for the inclusion of vaccine safety and informed consent protections in public health policies and laws.
    TheVaccineReaction.org is a journal newspaper founded in 1995 in print form that was re-launched in 2015 as a digital weekly publication;
    MedAlerts.org, created in 2003 and sponsored by NVIC since 2006, provides the public with a user-friendly way to search the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
    The NVIC’s work in state legislatures with families in every state over the past decade is one big reason why no state legislature has mandated the COVID shot. An historic victory, but the fight is far from over!

    Every donation you make during Vaccine Awareness Week can help support your right to know about vaccine risks and failures and your legal right to make an informed, voluntary vaccine decision. During this week, I’ll match your donations up to $100,000 to the NVIC.

    Resources Where You Can Learn More
    NVIC Advocacy Portal — Become a registered user of this unique and free online communications network that connects you directly with your own legislators and emails you action alerts about vaccine-related bills moving in your state, so you can be an effective vaccine choice advocate and protect your rights.

    You will only receive emails related to your own state but, as a registered Portal user, you also can stay up to date on vaccine-related bills being proposed in other states.

    Use it to inform your legislators about why it is necessary to protect vaccine exemptions and your legal right to make voluntary vaccine decisions for yourself and your children.

    Ask 8 Vaccine Information Kiosk — Download brochures and reports on vaccination and how to recognize vaccine reaction symptoms, as well as posters and web badges you can share with your family and friends. Access the illustrated and fully referenced “Guide to Reforming Vaccine Policy & Law” to educate your legislators when you advocate for vaccine informed consent rights.

    State Law & Vaccine Requirements — On this NVIC.org page, you can easily obtain your state’s current vaccine policies and laws.

    Vaccine Reaction Reporting — Search for and read descriptions of vaccine reaction reports made to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).

    Cry for Vaccine Freedom Wall — Read real stories from people who have been threatened, bullied and sanctioned for trying to make voluntary decisions about vaccination for themselves or their minor children. Post and share your own experience.

    Guide to Flu & Flu Vaccines — The “Mini Guide to influenza & Flu Vaccines” summarizes facts about influenza and influenza vaccines."

    https://rumble.com/v3rwot4-blacklist...-conscien.html
    Last edited by Harmony; 2nd November 2023 at 12:21. Reason: embed video
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  24. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (4th November 2023), Dennis Leahy (6th November 2023), fifi (2nd November 2023), Harmony (2nd November 2023), mountain_jim (2nd November 2023), Reinhard (4th November 2023), Vangelo (2nd November 2023)

  25. Link to Post #1693
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    11,526
    Thanks
    71,477
    Thanked 104,066 times in 11,366 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/172...729532914?s=20



    text

    The Vigilant Fox 🦊

    @VigilantFox
    Matthew Perry is not the only actor to die unexpectedly this year. There are at least 33 more:

    Oct. 31, 2023 - 50-year-old Tyler Christopher, ex-husband of Eva Longoria, star of “General Hospital” and “Days of our Lives”, died suddenly from a cardiac event in his San Diego Apartment.

    Oct. 29, 2023 - Filipino actor Joey Paras, age 45, died after a battle with an undisclosed illness

    Oct. 17, 2023 - London, UK - 38-year-old model and actress Tabby Brown, ex-girlfriend of Mario Balotelli, died suddenly and unexpectedly from a cardiac arrest. She had been absent from social media for 18 months. She appeared in ads for Canon and Virgin Atlantic.

    Oct. 5, 2023 - 53-year-old Keith Jefferson, actor who played in “Django Unchained”, “the Hateful Eight”, and close friend of Jamie Foxx, died suddenly on Oct.5, 2023 after being diagnosed with cancer in Aug.2023. Diagnosis to death: approximately one month.

    Sep. 30, 2023 - 35-year-old Egyptian actor, director Ahmed Samy El-Adl died suddenly on Sep.30, 2023, from cardiac arrest due to pulmonary embolism.

    Aug. 29, 2023 - 50-year-old Ahmo Kathleen Hight, American Fitness Model, Swimsuit Model and Actress. Died suddenly after "falling on the ground and hitting her head" on August 29, 2023. She didn't die of the fall but of a blood clot.

    Aug. 3, 2023 - 47-year-old actor Clifton Oliver died on August 3, 2023. He was battling "an illness" and had spent the last six weeks in a hospital and then hospice. His illness has not been revealed. Probably cancer.

    July 28, 2023 - 56-year-old actor Marc Gilpin died on July 28, 2023. He was diagnosed with glioblastoma May 5, 2022 with 2 inoperable tumors in his brain.

    July 21, 2023 - Nashville, TN - 44-year-old Shonka Dukureh, actress who played in the new film Elvis, died July 21, 2023. She was found dead by one of her children at 9:30am and ran to a neighbor who called 911. Autopsy: death due to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

    July 20, 2023 - Roodepoort, South Africa - 36-year-old actor Bradley Olivier died suddenly on July 20, 2023, days after being admitted to hospital, from heart attack.


    https://vigilantnews.com/post/actors...-recent-losses

    ACTORS Dying suddenly - Matthew Perry (age 54), Tyler Christopher (age 50) are the most recent losses
    34 young actors and actresses who died suddenly in 2023 - many had autopsies done

    This article originally appeared on makismd.substack.com and was republished with permission.

    Guest post by Dr. William Makis

    Oct.31, 2023 - 50 year old Tyler Christopher, ex-husband of Eva Longoria, star of “General Hospital” and “Days of our Lives”, died suddenly from a cardiac event in his San Diego Apartment.

    < many details and photos at link, including details for an actor I have been enjoying rewatching the show Fringe lately, who I did not know had died >

    Last edited by mountain_jim; 2nd November 2023 at 20:13.
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  26. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (4th November 2023), Dennis Leahy (6th November 2023), Ernie Nemeth (2nd November 2023), Ewan (2nd November 2023), Harmony (3rd November 2023), Reinhard (4th November 2023), Vangelo (3rd November 2023)

  27. Link to Post #1694
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    11,526
    Thanks
    71,477
    Thanked 104,066 times in 11,366 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    https://x.com/stkirsch/status/1720284825129771431?s=20



    I just left a voicemail for my good friend Ben Haynes at the CDC. He's in charge of Media Relations.

    I referenced
    @EthicalSkeptic
    tweet below in the call.

    I offered to share the data with him to give the CDC the opportunity to tell the world that they screwed up and promoted a deadly vaccine. I told him where I got the data and they can verify it themselves.

    If he refuses my offer to see the data, this will decimate their credibility even further.

    What do you think my friend Ben will do?

    This is the biggest PR disaster in CDC history, no doubt about it.



    Ethical Skeptic ☀
    @EthicalSkeptic
    Steve Kirsch
    @stkirsch
    has forwarded to me a statistically significant record-sample base describing deaths relative to decedents' vaccination date.

    In this data, one can observe a rolling and escalating-by-number-of-shots consistent chi-square death arrival form - which unambiguously substantiates its relationship to the vaccine.

    This is NOT, I repeat NOT, a 'correlation'
    . Don't use that word or canned apothegm if you want to be taken seriously.

    ///

    Steve Kirsch
    @stkirsch
    Ethical's post is the NAIL IN THE COFFIN for the CDC and vaccine manufacturers.

    The will not be able to obfuscate this. It took Ethical 30 seconds to see the signal.

    Any attempts to obfuscate what the data says will simply further discredit anyone who tries.


    It is over and THE TRUTH has won.


    https://x.com/stkirsch/status/1720284825129771431?s=20

    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  28. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (4th November 2023), Dennis Leahy (6th November 2023), fifi (5th November 2023), Harmony (4th November 2023), Reinhard (4th November 2023)

  29. Link to Post #1695
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    24,195
    Thanks
    51,892
    Thanked 130,055 times in 22,640 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Plandemic, Part 2
    by Dr. Joseph Mercola
    November 03, 2023
    https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...rid=1955511564

    https://media.mercola.com/ImageServe...nation-pdf.pdf

    Pt. 1

    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/IB3ijQuLkkUr/

    Pt. 2

    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/iRTCQoJoC6Hi/


    "STORY AT-A-GLANCE
    “Plandemic — Indoctornation” reveals the driving forces behind the vaccine agenda.
    It looks at the roles of the World Health Organization, Bill Gates, Tedros Adhanom, Dr. Anthony Fauci, mainstream media, Silicon Valley tech giants, Big Pharma and many others, connecting the dots between them
    The U.S. CDC owns the patent for SARS-CoV (the virus responsible for SARS) isolated from humans.
    In 2007, the CDC filed a petition with the patent office to keep their coronavirus patent confidential.
    They also own patents for detection methods, and for a kit to measure the virus
    By law, one cannot patent naturally-occurring DNA.
    If SARS-CoV is natural, then the patent is illegal. If the virus is manmade, the patent is legal, but the creation of the virus would be a violation of biological weapons treaties and laws.
    So, either way, the CDC has engaged in illegal activity
    Because the CDC owns the patent on SARS-CoV, it controls who has the ability to make inquiries into it.
    Unless authorized, you cannot look at the virus, you cannot measure it or make tests for it, since they own all those patents.
    This means the CDC has a major profit motive
    The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill owns a patent describing methods for producing recombinant coronaviruses

    Late in May 2020, media producer Mikki Willis released the first part of his documentary “Plandemic,” featuring Judy Mikovits, Ph.D., a cellular and molecular biologist1 whose research revealed many vaccines are contaminated with gammaretroviruses, due to the viruses being grown in contaminated animal cell lines. The 26-minute film was banned on every social media platform after going viral.2 August 18, 2020, Part 2, titled “Plandemic — Indoctornation,” was released.

    Plandemic — Indoctornation
    Part 2 is a full-length feature, revealing the driving force behind the vaccine agenda. It looks at the roles of the World Health Organization, Bill Gates, Tedros Adhanom, Dr. Anthony Fauci, mainstream media, Silicon Valley tech giants, Big Pharma and many others, connecting the dots between them. Willis interviews a variety of individuals, including:

    Activist and journalist Theo Wilson

    Researcher Dr. Aaron Lewis

    Board-certified primary care physician Dr. Jeff Barke

    Attorney, science teacher and author Kent Heckenlively

    Sherri Tenpenny, D.O.

    Dr. Rashid Buttar, medical director for the Centers for Advanced Medicine

    Author Curtis Cost

    Attorney David J. Follin

    Author and winner of the Doctors Who Rock Truth in Journalism Award 2017, Erin Elizabeth

    NJ state representative Jamel C. Holley

    Dr. Colin Gonsalves, senior counsel, Supreme Court of India

    Legal researcher Travis Middleton

    Mary Holland, vice chair and general counsel for the Children’s Health Defense

    Educator and activist Peggy Hall

    Kevin Jenkins, CEO of Urban Global Health Alliance

    Professor John Oller, researcher in theoretical and experimental biosemiotics

    Engineer and Google whistleblower Zach Vorhies

    Dr. George Zabrecky, physician, medical educator and researcher

    Dr. Pamela Popper, president of Wellness Forum Health

    Scientist Denis Rancourt, Ph.D.

    Dr. Meryl Nass, physician, researcher and writer

    Professor Dolores J. Cahill, Ph.D., a molecular biologist and immunologist

    Professor Luc Montagnier, a Nobel Laureate, medical researcher and virologist

    Free supplemental footage, including a follow-up interview with Mikovits, as well as links to additional resources provided by all of the interviewees are supposed to be available on the film’s website, plandemicseries.com.

    Event 201
    The film starts out by reviewing Event 201, a pandemic preparedness simulation hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in October 2019 — 10 weeks before the COVID-19 outbreak first began in Wuhan.

    This scripted tabletop exercise included everything we now see playing out in real time, in the real world, from PPE shortages, lockdowns and removal of civil liberties to mandated vaccination campaigns, riots, economic turmoil and the breakdown of social cohesion. A highlight reel of the predictions put forth during this event is included in the documentary.

    At the time, they spent a great deal of time discussing ways to limit and counter the spread of expected “misinformation” about the pandemic and the vaccines that would have to be developed. In addition to outright censorship, their plan included the use of “soft power,” a term referring to stealth influencing using celebrities and other social media influencers.

    I discussed this in “The PR Firm Behind WHO’s Celeb Endorsements.” Just as in real life, one of the pieces of “misinformation” that had to be countered was rumors that the virus had been created and released from a bioweapons laboratory.

    Operation Mockingbird Never Ended, It Just Got Privatized
    The film also reveals how SARS-CoV-2 has been turned into a profit center, the possible origins of SARS-CoV-2, and how Silicon Valley tech giants are controlling the narrative, pushing fearmongering and censoring differing views.

    What we’re seeing is straight out of the Operation Mockingbird playbook, a clandestine CIA media influencing campaign launched in the 1950s. During the Cold War, the CIA used it to spread propaganda. It recruited journalists to pen fake stories that disparaged communist ideologies.

    Today, they’re doing the complete opposite, promoting radical socialist ideas that support their plan for a technocratic economic system.

    Shockingly, the reason this shadow government — led by government contractors, privatized intelligence companies — are able to manipulate public opinion is because they’ve been illegally siphoning the data collected by the NSA from all Americans, and privatizing it.

    All of our personal data, combined with artificial intelligence and so-called localization strategies, allows sophisticated computer programs to predict which action or public message will result in a particular outcome.

    We’re in the midst of a social engineering project that poses a serious existential threat to our personal liberty and freedom. We’re all exposed to it daily, and have been for years. It’s just that now it’s become so pervasive, it’s blatantly obvious for anyone willing to see it. As you’d expect, “Plandemic — Indoctornation” also spends some time reviewing the role of Bill Gates and his foundation.

    CDC Owns Coronavirus Patents
    Willis interviews David E. Martin, Ph.D., a national intelligence analyst and founder of IQ100 Index, which developed linguistic genomics, a platform capable of determining the intent of communications. According to Martin, in 1999, IBM digitized 1 million U.S. patents, which allowed his company to conduct a review.

    Using linguistic genomics technology, Martin made the “horrific assessment” that one-third of all patents filed in the U.S. were functional forgeries, meaning that “while they had linguistic variations, they covered the same subject matter.” In 1999, patents for coronavirus also started to appear, “and thus began the rabbit trail,” Martin says.

    In 2003, Asia experienced an outbreak of SARS. Almost immediately, scientists began racing to patent the virus. Ultimately, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention nabbed ownership of SARS-CoV (the virus responsible for SARS) isolated from humans.

    The CDC actually owns the entire genetic content of that SARS virus. It’s patented under U.S. patent 7776521. They also own patents for detection methods, and for a kit to measure the virus.

    U.S. patent 7279327,3 filed by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, describes methods for producing recombinant coronaviruses. Ralph Baric, Ph.D., a professor of microbiology and immunology who is famous for his chimeric coronavirus research, is listed as one of the three inventors, along with Kristopher Curtis and Boyd Yount.

    The law clearly states that genetic segments are 'not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated.' So, either SARS-CoV was manmade, which would render the patent legal, or it’s natural, thus rendering the patent on it illegal. However, if the virus was manufactured, then it was created in violation of biological weapons treaties and laws.
    According to Martin, Fauci, Baric and the CDC “are at the hub” of the COVID-19 story. “In 2002, coronaviruses were recognized as an exploitable mechanism for both good and ill,” Martin says, and “Between 2003 and 2017, they [Fauci, Baric and CDC] controlled 100% of the cash flow to build the empire around the industrial complex of coronavirus.”

    CDC Has Broken the Law, One Way or Another
    Now, here’s the key take-home message Martin delivers. There’s a distinct problem with the CDC’s patent on SARS-CoV isolated from humans, because, by law, naturally occurring DNA segments are prohibited from being patented.

    The law clearly states that such segments are “not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated.” So, either SARS-CoV was manmade, which would render the patent legal, or it’s natural, thus rendering the patent on it illegal.

    However, if the virus was manufactured, then it was created in violation of biological weapons treaties and laws. This includes the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, passed unanimously by both houses of Congress and signed into law by George Bush Sr., which states:4

    “Whoever knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon, or knowingly assists a foreign state or any organization to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both. There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section committed by or against a national of the United States.”

    So, as noted by Martin, regardless of which scenario turns out to be true, the CDC has broken the law one way or another, either by violating biological weapons laws, or by filing an illegal patent. Even more egregious, May 14, 2007, the CDC filed a petition with the patent office to keep their coronavirus patent confidential.

    Now, because the CDC owns the patent on SARS-CoV, it has control over who had the ability to make inquiries into the coronavirus, Martin notes. Unless authorized, you cannot look at the virus, you cannot measure it or make tests for it, since they own the entire genome and all the rest.

    “By obtaining the patents that restrained anyone from using it, they had the means, the motive, and most of all, they had the monetary gain from turning coronavirus from a pathogen to a profit,” Martin says.

    Dangerous Gain-of-Function Research Was Permitted
    Martin goes on to describe events occurring between 2012 and 2013. At that time, the National Institutes of Health decided to take another look at gain-of-function research, ultimately deciding that gain-of-function research on coronavirus was too risky to continue.

    This led to the suspension of funding of such research in 2013. That included funding flowing into Harvard, Emery and University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. However, while the NIH had moral and even legal reasons for suspending such research, they made the funding pause voluntary, not mandatory.

    Then, in 2014, when the push-back against gain-of-function research into coronaviruses grew further, the NIH — under the leadership of Fauci — offshored that research to — you guessed it — the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

    However, as detailed by Martin, the funding was not sent in a straight-forward way. Instead, it was funneled through front organizations such as the EcoHealth Alliance, led by its president, Peter Daszak, whose research, according to the EcoHealth Alliance website, “includes identifying the bat origin of SARS.”5

    Between 2014 and 2019, EcoHealth Alliance received a long list of grants from the NIH to study “the risk of bat coronavirus emergence.” EcoHealth Alliance then subcontracted that work to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. So, in the end, the U.S. could deny culpability, blaming the outbreak on China when, in fact, it was American research that had been outsourced.

    Interestingly, in late-breaking news August 19, 2020, The Wall Street Journal6 reported that the NIH had notified EcoHealth that it wants “a sample of the new coronavirus that the Wuhan researchers used to determine its genetic sequence,” along with study details and other information.

    Additionally, the NIH demanded that EcoHealth “arrange for an inspection of the Wuhan Institute of Virology by an outside team that would examine the facility’s lab and records ‘with specific attention to addressing the question of whether WIV staff had SARS-CoV-2 in their possession prior to December 2019.’”

    The problem, Martin notes in “Indoctornation,” is that while the evidence is staring us right in the face, we’re told that so-called “fact-checkers” have a transcendent view of the situation, and they are the ultimate arbiters of truth. As a result, we have this very strange situation where facts and logic are being steamrolled and lambasted as good old-fashioned heresy.

    Will Truth Prevail?
    The film goes on to interview many other experts, many of whom are convinced the evidence points to SARS-CoV-2 being a manmade virus. Like Plandemic Part 1, Part 2 is well worth your time. As noted by Willis, in today’s fast-paced world, few have the time to do the necessary research to unveil what’s really going on.

    The evidence is there, but you have to put it together. This is why documentaries such as “Plandemic” and “Shadowgate” are so useful. They weave the dots together so that you can see a fuller, more complete picture. Unfortunately, the picture at present is grim.

    Yet, we must face it because it’s not going away or resolving in the near future. It is important to understand that we are all being subjected to a massive propaganda campaign to move us toward a very specific technocratic agenda. It is only by seeking alternative views that we can begin to understand the truth.

    In the case of coronavirus, it should be clear that gain-of-function research is a dangerous game that should not be permitted. By giving researchers the go-ahead to continue this kind of research, even as the NIH publicly “paused” funding for it, the NIH failed to uphold its moral and legal responsibilities.

    It’s also clear that the CDC has engaged in illegal activities relating to the patenting of the virus, and that they had ample motive and means to profit from a coronavirus pandemic. It’s hard to imagine a more corrupt system than what we currently have. The question is: When will something be done about it?"

    - Sources and References
    1 MJforMDs.org Judy Mikovits Bio
    2 FreedomPlatform.tv/plandemic
    3 United States Patent 7279327 April 19, 2002
    4 S.993 Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989
    5 EcoHealth Alliance 2020
    6 The Wall Street Journal August 19, 2020
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  30. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (4th November 2023), Bo Atkinson (9th November 2023), Dennis Leahy (6th November 2023), fifi (5th November 2023), Harmony (4th November 2023), mountain_jim (4th November 2023), shaberon (4th November 2023)

  31. Link to Post #1696
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    24,195
    Thanks
    51,892
    Thanked 130,055 times in 22,640 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Darkfield Microscopy Of Micro Robots In Live Blood Exposed to Scalar Wave Quantum Cold Laser
    Humanity United Now - Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD
    NOV 3, 2023
    https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.co...m_medium=email



    "I had looked at this live blood analysis with my Darkfield Microscope and saw micro robots. I call them this as I see them emitting light in multiple frequencies. They appear to clearly be artificially intelligent. The nanotechnology and engineering literature that describes polymer coated quantum dots in the 100nm size range. These structures are in the size range of about 500nm - but the Darkfield microscope makes them appear larger then they are by about a factor of 15.

    Many people have wondered if different frequencies would deactivate the microbots.
    I took my 405nm Quantum Scalar Wave Cold Laser and pulsed it at 3 frequencies of 528nm, 369nm, 417nm. These frequencies obviously have healing effects on DNA. I was wondering if it would deactivate the microbots.

    In the video below you can see a microbot in the blood. I turned on the laser at the beginning of the video and pointed it to the slide. It did not appear to me that the bot reacted.

    (video at the link)

    I found another microbot. I call the microbot the blinking lights that are seemingly changing size but clearly pulsing light frequency, mainly in the visible light and blue range from what I can tell. This microbot seemed to be somewhat affected by the Cold Laser scalar wave frequency. It stops in its tracks and seems to become immobile within a few minutes of shining the laser on the blood.

    (video at the link)

    Here is another microbot in the same blood sample that I zoomed in on and then exposed to the laser. This one does not seem to react much and continues on its mission to attack red blood cells.

    (video at the link)

    For the time I observed the microbots with exposure to the cold laser I did not see a significant effect. I have looked at live blood analysis after using scalar wave technology like the EES system. It helps the red blood cells and seems to reduce rouleaux formation but does not reduce the nano and micro technology in the blood. Many people think using Rife frequencies will help, but you cannot dissolve plastic or rubber with Rife, which is what hydrogel is. Remember, some clinicians are thinking these are parasites. They are not. Look at the work of the toxicologist Dr. Hildi Staninger. She was a pioneer of testing these brain computer interface technologies that have been weaponized upon targeted people via brain chips and implants for decades as well as via Morgellons. She had an expert parasitologist confirm that Morgellon’s is not a parasite, it is a synthetic polymer plastic silicone technology using animal proteins with metals in it. Please read her analysis on these plasmonic crystal nanomachines that have been deployed on humanity for decades. Many targeted individuals suffer from these implants and they have been removed and analyzed as shown in the article below. Morgellon’s is one form of this warfare, for the biosensors can be inhaled on a mass scale when aerosolized as smart dust. Her toxicology analysis clearly shows it is not a parasite but polyamide protein and metal based DNA sensor. Clifford Carnicom and I also found these polyamide groups as the main component of hydrogel in Near Infrared Spectroscopy. He calls the micro robots CDB.

    GLOBAL BRAIN CHIP AND MESOGENS Nano Machines for Ultimate Control of False Memories - Computer System For Collective Mind Control
    ANA MARIA MIHALCEA, MD, PHD
    ·
    JUL 18



    “To understand the technology of mesogens and their multiple smart functional uses for sensing, payload delivery systems, and other related aspects of their design, one must always remember that the mesogen is the tool or device – like the wheel on a car for the nano machine. The nano machine can be designed to become the robot, surgical scalpel, camera…

    Read full story: https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.co...-mesogens-nano
    Summary:

    Direct exposure to healing frequency pulsed cold scalar quantum laser does not seem to deter the micro robotic artificial intelligence bidirectional telemetry biosensors."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  32. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (4th November 2023), Bo Atkinson (9th November 2023), Dennis Leahy (6th November 2023), Harmony (4th November 2023), mountain_jim (4th November 2023), Reinhard (4th November 2023), shaberon (4th November 2023)

  33. Link to Post #1697
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    1st April 2016
    Posts
    5,599
    Thanks
    27,696
    Thanked 31,656 times in 5,248 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    The CDC actually owns the entire genetic content of that SARS virus. It’s patented under U.S. patent 7776521. They also own patents for detection methods, and for a kit to measure the virus.

    U.S. patent 7279327,3 filed by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, describes methods for producing recombinant coronaviruses. Ralph Baric, Ph.D., a professor of microbiology and immunology who is famous for his chimeric coronavirus research, is listed as one of the three inventors, along with Kristopher Curtis and Boyd Yount.


    This is one of those areas where a "legal thing" sounds like it is happening.

    I keep finding big lawsuits that are being dismissed as No Cause.

    I am concerned it may be a racket, because then you can come back and complain how your rights were trampled by the court, or something like that.

    And so I would suggest the article is "partially true in character, but not in fact". I do not think it is an accurate assessment of how these patents work. And then it is tied to a sort of foreboding presumption at law.

    More likely if there are legal grounds for something, Insurance would use it. Back then they got mad because people were dying wrongly. This is kind of a big deal. I'm not aware as to how they have reacted.

    If the subject as presented is viable, then you have to cite a statute that covers the claim. Referring to the bioweapons act is moot.

    Then you have to process it with the following criticism from McGill:


    Quote There are two lessons I want to draw from this on-going patent fear-mongering. The first is that “coronavirus” is not a word that only applies to the agent behind COVID-19. Coronaviruses are a subfamily in the grand classification of viruses. They include our current enemy, SARS-CoV-2, but also a different coronavirus that caused SARS nearly twenty years ago, and the coronavirus that produces the Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome (MERS). This subfamily also contains the coronaviruses that are responsible for 15 to 30% of cases of the common cold in humans. And, importantly, there are many coronaviruses that do not infect us but that cause respiratory and gastrointestinal infections in animals, like birds and pigs. So when we hear of a patent on “the coronavirus,” our first question should be, “which one?” The second lesson is that fact-checking certain bold claims can be remarkably simple, even without a science degree!

    I tracked down the patents that have been scaring people into believing in a coronavirus conspiracy. They are easily findable on the website patents.google.com. Is any of them a smoking gun for the conspiracy-minded? Not at all.

    The Pirbright Institute, a research centre in England, filed for a patent on “the coronavirus” in 2015, but it is for a coronavirus that causes avian bronchitis. The word “avian” means “relating to birds.” This is not SARS-CoV-2; it’s a virus called IBV. (Multiple instances of this application can be found as US10130701B2, EP3172319A1 and EP3172319B1.) The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill was flagged in the conspiracy video Plandemic as being the start of the coronavirus patent “rabbit trail,” but the patent we are shown is for a coronavirus that causes gastroenteritis in pigs and that typically kills newborn piglets that catch it (US7279327B2 and WO 02/086068 A2).

    A French conspiracy video making the rounds points to a coronavirus patent held by the Institut Pasteur, the CNRS, and the Université Paris VII (EP 1 694 829 B1). The video even goes so far as to accuse France of creating the COVID-19 coronavirus and releasing it in Wuhan. The French patent, as it turns out, is for a human coronavirus: SARS-CoV. Before COVID-19, the virus responsible for SARS in 2003 was called “SARS-CoV.” Some researchers have now begun to refer to it as “SARS-CoV-1” to more clearly distinguish it from SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19. When a patent application from the early 2000s refers to “SARS-CoV”, it is a different virus than the one we are dealing with now, which did not exist at the time (a precursor of it was most likely being passed around in animals like bats but it had not been transmitted to humans yet). Another patent application, this one filed by Chiron Corp in 2004, is also tied to SARS-CoV-1 (US2006257852A1).

    But scientists cannot patent life, you may think to yourself. It is true that no one can patent an entire living thing as it naturally exists in the world. It also bears mentioning that viruses are not technically alive though they share some characteristics with living things. However, part of a living thing that has real-world utility and that has been transformed in some way by humans can be patented. In the case of these SARS coronavirus patents, companies wanted to protect the isolation of the genetic material of specific strains of this virus in order to exclude others from commercializing a testing kit or even a potential vaccine based on that virus.

    In fact, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States stepped in at the time and filed their own patent on the isolated SARS virus, its genes, its proteins, and the methods to detect it and the infection it was causing (US7220852B1 and US7776521B1). The reason? They wanted to prevent others from “monopolizing the field” and to allow researchers to develop diagnostics and therapeutics to help deal with the SARS outbreak.

    Whether or not using technology to isolate genetic material that exists in the wild should even be patentable is a valid discussion to have. In fact, an American company that held the patent on the BRCA1/2 genes for breast cancer and ovarian cancer testing was sued over the validity of this patent. The case made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled in 2013 that simply isolating a natural product is not enough to warrant a patent. But just because some research centres and companies filed to patent animal coronaviruses and the human SARS virus means absolutely nothing with regards to the COVID-19 coronavirus. There is still zero evidence that this new coronavirus was created by humans and every indication that it mutated spontaneously, as viruses routinely do, and became good at invading human cells.

    So I think there is some difficulty with making a thesis on the virus itself, and, oh, they broke the law with it.

    As conjecture, if one were to argue the last sentence in the quote, then I would suggest two problems with the "illegal artificial virus of Wuhan" idea:

    *If* it is artificial, it was probably made somewhere else, such as Ukraine.

    *Whether or not* it is artificial, it is completely correct that Dr. Baric of UNC is behind mRNA vaccines, a new one for every tiny little thing, for the rest of the future. The vaccines and other reactions, of course, are much more open to legal and moral issues, than the virus itself. From having reviewed his work, I would call it highly unlikely that had anything to do with Covid. But it has everything to do with vaccine.

  34. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to shaberon For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (4th November 2023), Dennis Leahy (6th November 2023), Harmony (6th November 2023), mountain_jim (4th November 2023), Vangelo (4th November 2023)

  35. Link to Post #1698
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    24,195
    Thanks
    51,892
    Thanked 130,055 times in 22,640 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    I think that info about patents for viruses is kind of a side note in view of the full focus of Dr. Ana's report, which begins by describing AI nanobots which are being injected into humans (under the guise of a vaccine), self-replicating bots which affect consciousness and free will, as they are apparently designed to reshape human beings into something other. We are living in scifi world now, and I can think of no better way that is being demonstrated.
    It opens up a whole new field of inquiry, perhaps one in which there are not yet many (or any) applicable laws or precedents that could be used in a normal court of law.
    (Not that it's a "normal" situation.)

    Perhaps the focus on the patents for vaccines and/or viruses and the legal procedures that may be used in the case in point is just provided as a prelude to the difficulties to what may be forthcoming if the nanobots ever come to a court's attention.
    Most likely those issues will be addressed in the coming reports from Dr. Ana, reports which have definitely been building on each other in a very integrated and organized way (which is quite fascinating if you can take a step back to see the whole picture, and if you can stand the horror! )
    Fortunately, one of her goals is also to find ways to effectively deal with the bots once they have been released, and I think we will be hearing more about that in time, as the work proceeds.
    If her reports seem a bit disorganized, it's probably because she has taken on such a huge puzzle, and a very dangerous one at that, with many disparate pieces.
    She has recently joined a team, Humanity United Now, made up of professionals from different fields, all working toward the goal of protecting the human race.
    They may as yet be a bit disorganized, but I think that will improve, as Dr. Ana's work alone has improved exponentially in a very short amount of time.
    BTW, Naomi Wolf just came out with some interesting news about the source of COVID. See: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1584506
    Quote Posted by shaberon (here)

    *Whether or not* it is artificial, it is completely correct that Dr. Baric of UNC is behind mRNA vaccines, a new one for every tiny little thing, for the rest of the future. The vaccines and other reactions, of course, are much more open to legal and moral issues, than the virus itself. From having reviewed his work, I would call it highly unlikely that had anything to do with Covid. But it has everything to do with vaccine.
    Last edited by onawah; 4th November 2023 at 22:05.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  36. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (4th November 2023), Dennis Leahy (6th November 2023), Harmony (6th November 2023), mountain_jim (4th November 2023), Sue (Ayt) (4th November 2023)

  37. Link to Post #1699
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    24,195
    Thanks
    51,892
    Thanked 130,055 times in 22,640 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Nanotechnology, Synthetic Biology, Transhumanism And The Fight For The Survival Of Our Species: My Interview With Dr. Rima Laibow
    ANA MARIA MIHALCEA, MD, PHD
    NOV 4, 2023
    https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.co...m_medium=email


    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/y1z50dQgMPHT/


    "I am so honored to speak with my friend and colleague Dr Rima Laibow again. She is one of the few freedom fighting physicians that completely understand the nanotechnological threat to humanity and is not afraid to speak about it. She also is working on a randomized controlled trial to study the efficacy of EDTA Chelation and other modalities to clear the blood. We both are certified Chelation practitioners.

    We have much in common, hence speak about many subjects, like my research on nanotechnology and live blood findings, depopulation agenda, mind control, legal action plans nationally and globally against the bioweapons, and strategies of exiting the WHO, United Nations, and more…

    Please visit Dr Rima’s website:https://preventgenocide2030.org/ "

    Humanity United Now - Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  38. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (4th November 2023), Delight (5th November 2023), Dennis Leahy (6th November 2023), Harmony (6th November 2023), Reinhard (6th November 2023), Vangelo (5th November 2023)

  39. Link to Post #1700
    Honored, Retired Member. Hervé passed on 13 November 2024.
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,694
    Thanks
    46,568
    Thanked 35,376 times in 4,672 posts

  40. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (5th November 2023), Dennis Leahy (6th November 2023), grapevine (5th November 2023), mountain_jim (5th November 2023), s7e6e (6th November 2023), Sunny (5th November 2023)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 85 of 109 FirstFirst 1 35 75 85 95 109 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts