.
Posted by Vangelo (here)
The thing that motivated Peterson to take a stand was the concept of compelled speech i.e. laws that forced him to say specific things and at the same time prohibited him from saying other things. Peterson actually had no problem with calling people by their preferred pronoun, But he rejected, and fought against, the institution of laws that required him to do so. It seems to me, this doctor was not grandstanding but instead holding the same principled position as Peterson.
I agree. It appears the 'progressive' attempt here by globalists is to upend society by 'gently' steering it, at first, with unwanted yet mild collectivism/Marxist indoctrination. Then, once everyone's 'softened up', pummel everyone with the iron fist of totalitarianism. With Peterson, I think we're being shown the iron fist. They're trying to camouflage it by making it seem like a fair and 'voluntary' process even though they've already judged and defamed Peterson and further threatened him with the removal of his license to practice.
If Peterson wants to play the game of calling people by their 'preferred pronoun', that's up to him. He'll have to live with himself on that one (entertaining someone who may have serious mental/physical issues). I think the point is nobody should be forced to (by the person demanding it OR the government).
We never had this 'gender' problem until very recently. This is manufactured discord, to blur the sexes (the manufactured/steered 'LGBTQ' movement, just like the newly manufactured/steered 'racism' -- all springing up out of nowhere including every other divisive wedge issue that can be weaponized against the public). It's plain as day that the recent creeping discordant collectivism that is being artificially and deliberately injected into society is meant to pave the way to totalitarianism.




Reply With Quote



Bookmarks