The White Race

[Ernie Nemeth]

Seems only appropriate that there be a thread for all things about The White Race.

Negative or positive, funny or tragic. It belongs here.


Let's unravel the myth about the White Race and dispel the rhetoric, if possible.


My skin is white, in winter, very brown, in summer.


I am proud of the White Race that I belong to and make no apologies.



Having said that, it is not how I identify. I am human. Color of skin has no bearing on anything.

What white people of what white country decided amongst themselves that their problem was there was not enough diversity in their countries?
Of course it was not the white race, as a majority, that brought this on themselves.
It was the minorities in our countries, that we brought in for humanitarian reasons, that has driven this mixing of races and the dilution of almost all white countries - those minorities and the NGOs and UN agencies that support and advocate for them.


It is astonishing to me that there is controversy about any White country. What is the matter? No other color skin is asked to mix their countries with other skin colors - only the whites. Why is that? Is it really about 'systemic racism'? Can whites use this argument in, say, India - that there is 'systemic racism' against them in India or China or South Africa or...?


Although it is not the intention of this thread to be racist, all responses by any skin color are welcome. Sorry, but this topic must be addressed and regardless of intent it will seem racist.
So be it.
Discussion is more important in a democracy than hurt feelings.

[Sue (Ayt)]

Somehow it seems almost inherent in human nature that there is an urge to level things out, meaning to bring down the perceived "top dogs" in general.

It is like excellency in any endeavor is resented, whether it be intelligence, talent, wealth, health, beauty, popularity, etc. - Whatever it may be that humans aspire to and feel thwarted about obtaining for themselves. Thus begins the blame game.

The white raced nations likely fall into that category, thus it was fairly simple to direct that "jealousy/victim urge as an attempt to solve the problems encountered by other nations. (although some "top dogs" obviously have achieved their status by exploitive means. Some, but not all.)

And of course, projecting any motives of "some" onto "all" may have been a survival mechanism of humans in the past that is simply no longer called for in an advanced society.

Leveling perceived peaks as opposed to raising perceived valleys may be an attempt to restore balance. ?

Just pondering thoughts here... Total expansion of everything, ie aspiration to excellency rather than resentment may hold hope, but that way of thinking would need to be instilled, and few if any cultures attempt to do that, in my opinion.

[Ernie Nemeth]

In response to Sue above:

Two things came to mind reading your post.

The evolution of the ships of war.
A set of science fiction novels about the Pak.

I believe there is an element of truth to the idea that the white race has provoked the jealousy of other races.


To that assessment I would argue that it is entirely natural that the first to take advantage of technology will likely continue to advance as technology improves. And that those countries that invested in the most advantageous technologies first would naturally dominate the world. The arms races in the building of ships of war in the last 150 years highlights this dynamic.

The Man-of-War ships of British fame were the single reason Britain could acquire and maintain a world-wide trading empire. And the building of giant ships of war itself became a threat to the British. Any country that attempted to build an armada to rival Britain's dominance of the seas required immediate and decisive violent sanction.
When iron and steel came on the scene Britain rapidly transformed its fleet to remain dominant. Then Britain went on a rampage to ensure other countries, primarily France and Germany, did not have the time or resources to build their own modern fleets.
The World Wars resulted directly from these arms races.


In Larry Niven's world there is a race called the Pak. This race is technology driven. Their planet often spawns multiple groups that then race to build war machines that can destroy the other groups. Only problem, the Pak are technology savvy and when one group develops a tech, the other groups quickly develop other tech to counter it. So the Pak very often race through technology and develop incredible war machines until the tech and the wars knock them back to the stone ages. Sometimes some of the Pak decide to go off world, perhaps in search of superior tech, perhaps to escape the certainty of their race's usual fate - eradication.

After a long journey, that included extended stays in stasis on some backwards planets and the manipulation of indigenous species to advance in technology to the point they could help the Pak continue on his journey with new parts and restocked supplies, a solitary Pak made it to Earth.
Long story short...single handedly, he destroys humanity.


There is a moral to this story that also manages to illuminate the almost inevitable direction of, what seems, any technology-driven society that results either in total destruction or ... something else?

No one seems to talk about what that something else could possibly be.

[lake]

It is an valid thread but may require quite some guidance by the mod team lol.

May I ask a question please .... Why is there a "White Race" on this planet?

How has that happened and why are we not all the same?

I know the bull given by "Trust the Science" but it makes little actual sense!
There are meant to be only 37 facial types (so cloning, maybe not .... it is just the limited number of variations) but there are vast differences between the so called "Races"

So how come there is a "White Race" at all (on a world they are not really constructed to exist on) .... why?

[Ernie Nemeth]

Posted by lake (here)
It is an valid thread but may require quite some guidance by the mod team lol.

May I ask a question please .... Why is there a "White Race" on this planet?

How has that happened and why are we not all the same?

I know the bull given by "Trust the Science" but it makes little actual sense!
There are meant to be only 37 facial types (so cloning, maybe not .... it is just the limited number of variations) but there are vast differences between the so called "Races"

So how come there is a "White Race" at all (on a world they are not really constructed to exist on) .... why?

Excellent! I love it.
Why indeed?

[lake]

There is the hypothetical question .... "How many generations living underground would it take to change the 'color' of a surviving group of humans skin from dark to light?"

But then you have the fact that facially you cannot alter an image of a .... lets say Chinese human .... to look like they are "White Race" (nor can you for any other race .... and the reverse applies .... you can't make a white person look Black or Aboriginal or Asian)

[Kindred]

According to Thiaoouba Prophecy, ALL the human races on Earth Came From Somewhere Else... Earth is a 'melting pot' of a number of human races and it's quite interesting that of all Earth's countries, the US is the 'melting pot' of Earth.

While it specifically identified the origins of the Black, Asian, and Polynesian races, the White race is omitted from their description. Note that they state that the Arab race is a mixture of the Black and Asian races, and the Hebrews were another, more recent race... this includes what we call the Palestinians who are Semites (of the Hebrew race), but it is to be noted that the majority of 'Jews' in Israel are of Khazarian origin - Not Semitic.

There are other 'stories' about the Nordics from different sources, like 'Aldebaran', 'Akart', & 'Ummo' and there's one that suggests some Whites came from Venus, but from a different 'level' of this physical universe where Venus is a ecological paradise, much like Earth.

Here's a link to these stories compiled by Col. Wendell Stevens... many (if not all) are archived in the Avalon library.

http://www.galactic.no/linkmap.html

Yes... we are All shades of 'tan'.... some darker than others, but all our bones are white, and our blood is red.

In Unity, Peace and LOVE

[shaberon]

In classical Greece, the ideal of women's beauty was to be very pale--because they didn't have to work outdoors. Men were bronzed because they did.


It would not occur to me there was such a thing as "white race" unless someone put it as an option to select on a form.

I might agree with "multiple white races". Like for example, if you call a Malaysian a Japanese, they might smack you. It wouldn't make sense for them to be lumped together as "Asian".

Concerning immigration, we are only whites here in the west mostly because of desperation. Why would all those people basically flee the UK and Germany?? Then you got a century of Italians in order to undermine the Pope, and, when it was enough, we invented Eugenics and called them lazy and moronic and turned off the free passage. Aren't they white? Or too olivey??

A big part of the reason our Revolutionary War was fought was to make it easier to ship in more migrants from more places.


Genetically, a decent portion of Swahili Africa is mixed with Arabs and Indians for over a thousand years.

There are no Israeli descendants of Khazarians.

In America, it is hard to say anything about the open door. I can say that legal Mexicans do not like the illegals, and there is frequently animosity between Latinos of neighboring countries. Almost all of them are all mixed, sitting under a cadre of White Conquistadors who will probably never leave.

As for places like Sweden, that were *not* traditional immigration grounds, turning into some kind of vacuum cleaner in the ca. 1980s...that's a little different. That does have some kind of arbitrary, modern tinkering to it. It may be the attempt to disprove white racist supremacism. That was certainly a big deal here in the 60s. As a matter of fact I started school the year it was integrated.

What that means is, since the end of slavery, things were that bad for a hundred years. In 1960 you could just walk in some place with a sign saying No Colored. And what am I supposed to say...the supremacists are still here. But this was about people who were already living in the same area.

I think it was used as a talking point to spur bodies of relevant legislation.

[RatRodRob...RRR]

For yrs now white south africans have been run off their farms, animal and crops, some murdered, how is that turning out for SA.


RRR

[pueblo]

Is there a white race though? Surely, white is just a skin colour, not a race? Is ethnicity a better identifier than skin colour?

I realise that this may just be semantics, so apologies if this is off-topic!

Modern scholarship views racial categories as socially constructed, that is, race is not intrinsic to human beings but rather an identity created, often by socially dominant groups, to establish meaning in a social context. Different cultures define different racial groups, often focused on the largest groups of social relevance, and these definitions can change over time.

-Wikipedia

[Losus4]

All across the Western world there is a very clear psychological and spiritual war being waged upon white people. Whites are the only race who are not allowed to express any kind of racial solidarity, the kind that all other races do be default. Example: for blacks to be proud of being black, non-blacks will congratulate them for it. When whites express pride of being white, all ethnicities—other whites included—will condemn them as hateful bigots. Whites also cannot have things exclusive to them, the way blacks for example have the MOBO awards (music of black origin) For anything to be "white exclusive" would be condemned immediately, despite there being far fewer white people in global demographics than blacks or asians. Why do all races except for whites, get to be proud of their cultural and racial heritage, but whites and whites alone are not?

The Marxist parasites that infest every pillar of Western society knew they could not wage open war on us, so they did it through culture. Hence the term "Cultural Marxism." The same parasitic forces who turned pre-WW2 Germany into a degenerate, morally depraved ****hole are the very same parasitic forces who have now done the same to the US.

Whites cannot survive unless they purge this spiritual sickness from their collective psyche -

"The spiritual sickness of white people" -

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Nw1QMphL00s

[Rizotto]

Quoting Ernie from post #1 above:

"What white people of what white country decided amongst themselves that their problem was there was not enough diversity in their countries?"

However, how does one define a 'white country'? How can anyone prove that only white people from the beginning of times had been living in a certain country?

If assuming that Canada is a 'white country', let's remember that indigenous people of another race were here already by the time that Europeans moved in. Many indigenous people were not happy about this. Sudden mass migration karma has now hit Canada. But this time it's all from the globalist cabal scheming to destroy the 'west'.

[Kindred]

An addendum to my earlier post: There is Not just one 'white' race - there are a Number of 'white' races across our galaxy, and beyond... ALL "races" are 'variations' of an overriding theme:

That of an INFINITE MULTI-DIMENSIONAL CREATOR SPIRIT, Experiencing a Brief FOCUS in a Specific Space-Time Continuum THAT WE CREATE THROUGH OUR CONSCIOUS INTENT.

Our bodies are temporary vessels to allow us to have This EXPERIENCE.



In Unity Peace and LOVE

[John Hilton]

"The overarching goal of the “open borders” movement is to flood millions of non-Whites into all traditionally White nations. Make no mistake—this is not mere coincidence. It is White genocide by design, worldwide in application.

The United States, Great Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Australia: White people founded and populated these nations. All of these nations operated under the implicit mandate, if not explicit by law, that they existed as White nations for the posterity of the White founding stock. All of these nations had overwhelmingly White populations for the preponderance of their national histories. Now, in the beginning of the twenty-first century, all of these traditionally White nations face demographic upheavals through massive non-White immigration.

The White populations of these countries are slated to become minority populations in just a few generations."

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.ne...design-part-1/

[Ernie Nemeth]

Let's not split hairs on this thread, okay? We all know what a 'white country' is. All of Europe. 45 countries.

[Ernie Nemeth]

White skin seems to be the base of the human form. Whites certainly did not adapt the color because of northern climes. This is evident in the fact that blacks have white palms and feet. Instead, black skin is an adaptation to equatorial climate. The melatonin regulation of white skin is the norm, so that they can adapt to any climate.
Which almost certainly means that all humans are not indigenous to Earth.
With our 42 Chromosomes, that proves it unequivocally.
Our closest cousin, the chimpanzee, has 44.
How did we manage to do more with less?

[Kindred]

Posted by shaberon (here)

There are no Israeli descendants of Khazarians.

From the National Library of Medicine: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3595026/

"Recent sequencing of modern Caucasus populations prompted us to revisit the Khazarian hypothesis and compare it with the Rhineland hypothesis. We applied a wide range of population genetic analyses to compare these two hypotheses. Our findings support the Khazarian hypothesis and portray the European Jewish genome as a mosaic of Near Eastern-Caucasus, European, and Semitic ancestries, thereby consolidating previous contradictory reports of Jewish ancestry. "

In other words, the majority of the European Jews who emigrated to the enforced state of Israel were of Khazarian origin.

This is not meant as an affront to the people in question. It only clarifies that which has only been inferred.

I stand by my assertion that these bodies that we inhabit are merely vessels by which we may have the necessary Experiences to enrich our SOUL.

As Jesus admonished us... LOVE ONE-ANOTHER. To do otherwise is to sow our destruction.

In Unity, Peace and LOVE

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Ernie Nemeth (here)
Let's not split hairs on this thread, okay? We all know what a 'white country' is. All of Europe. 45 countries.

Well, Caucasian might be a better descriptor. Russians are 'white' (mostly), and so are Ukrainians and Belarusians. Are those countries in 'Europe'? (Discuss. )

[Kindred]

Bill... thanks for bringing that up (Caucasian)... I was tempted to use that nomenclature but figured I'd just 'go with the flow' and stick with 'White'...

[Kindred]

Well... here's a new video on Rumble.... >Get Ready for the Next Great Anti-White Swindle< 13 min

Discusses how 'climate change' will be used to justify mass migration to the West as it is the 'White's fault' that this change is destroying the ability of indigenous people to cultivate crops... and causing every other type of calamity yet to come.

https://rumble.com/v4azqab-get-ready...e-swindle.html



Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v48efgt