The Fall of the House of Windsor?

[Brigantia]

Another alleged sighting today, Kate was supposedly going to Westminster Abbey but William went in there without her. He doesn't look too happy in the car. This is 'evidence' that she's out and about but with her head turned to the side and the poor picture quality it could be anyone. Pippa standing in again? WTH is going on?

[Eric J (Viking)]

Yes I agree with Brigantia there is a huge amount going on with the royal family perhaps we should change the thread title to

'The fall of the house of Windsor'.

I’m sure Avalonians will agree.

Mods…yes?

[norman]

Now 'Escape Kate' is issuing public statements.

[ assuming this image isn't fake too ]

https://t.me/s/UnityNewsNetwork/17093

[Journeyman]

Posted by Seeclearly (here)
Mira Finch argues that with the history & scale of the Royal P.R. machine it should be assumed that all happenings,including the release of an "obviously photoshopped" pic., are being stagemanaged.
to the end of an "controlled demolition " of the monarchy.

"Rumours and theories abound, and a very obviously photoshopped image of Kate and kids released to the public to "reassure" us of her wellbeing has done nothing but fuel further speculation and doubt, given all the anomalies in the image (Charlotte's missing sleeve, a full flowering tree in March, Louis' weird hand).

It is my contention that all these apparent ructions in the Royal Family are being strategically stage-managed for a reason, and that they are not happening by accident: the Royal PR machine is one of the most sophisticated in the world, with centuries of experience, and they don't do things by accident.

Thus, we can be sure that they want us suspicious and speculating, they want us questioning the health and viability of key high-profile Royals, and they want our faith in the monarchic institution to exponentially decline."

Personally, I agree that it will all be stage- managed , for sure .
Here is her full article....

https://open.substack.com/pub/miri/p...utm_medium=web

I think this is the alchemic process in operation. Dissolution, required to break down the old structure to allow for the formation of a new one. You can file the obvious errors in this latest story:

https://x.com/lmxstn/status/1767154095238897954?s=20

and:

https://x.com/lmxstn/status/1767223363838345310?s=20

alongside the 'Mr Magoo' moments with the 'current' US President. You have to either accept that organisations that were hitherto watchwords for scrupolous efficiency are now institutionally inept, or that the mistakes are deliberate and part of a wider demolition process.

edit: embedding fail

[norman]

I found this post on line:

So it is now clear the last 3 apparent photos released of Kate Middleton have been faked.

It isn't actually funny anymore.

If this was any other family the police and social services would be getting involved.

At this stage you have to think the worst.

[Mari]

I previously posted this in the Turmoil in the British Isles thread.

I'd like to add a further comment to what I and others have posted - something which has also occurred to me today: Perhaps we are being set up to fail. Because the picture is so very obviously photoshopped, I think it was produced to get the 'conspiracy-theorist' mindset amongst us off to new frenzied heights (mine included) knowing there'd be a storm of conjecture on top of all the 'coy-ness' and seeming secrecy from the royals regarding her hospital stay and whereabouts. I mean - witness the speculation and the more crazy explanations in recent weeks.

So - when Kate finally makes her appearance after Easter (as we are told is going to happen) then all us 'conspiracy -theoristas' are going to look pretty daft, because the bbc/press/influencers et al are going to hammer us big time and go all-out to denigrate alt thinking/truthseeking. Further, William, Kate and kids will be reported as 'deeply upset' etc etc and what with Charles being ill with the Big C and all that stuff, and so the preparation for the Online Harms and Safety Bill will roar into overdrive to stop all the 'hate speech'

So, all those who dare to question the Narrative will be guilty by association. All by design.

I do wonder, if this is the case, whether the royals are complicit in this. If it's ever found out that they are, then absolutely they will lose all remaining respect. And my dislike of them will soar to new heights.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Eric J (Viking) (here)
Yes I agree with Brigantia there is a huge amount going on with the royal family perhaps we should change the thread title to

'The fall of the house of Windsor'.

I’m sure Avalonians will agree.

Mods…yes?

Mod note from Bill:

Yes, all agreed, and I've changed the thread title to The Fall of the House of Windsor? — with a question mark, to encourage discussion on that broader topic.

[norman]

Posted by Mari (here)
I previously posted this in the Turmoil in the British Isles thread.

I'd like to add a further comment to what I and others have posted - something which has also occurred to me today: Perhaps we are being set up to fail. Because the picture is so very obviously photoshopped, I think it was produced to get the 'conspiracy-theorist' mindset amongst us off to new frenzied heights (mine included) knowing there'd be a storm of conjecture on top of all the 'coy-ness' and seeming secrecy from the royals regarding her hospital stay and whereabouts. I mean - witness the speculation and the more crazy explanations in recent weeks.

So - when Kate finally makes her appearance after Easter (as we are told is going to happen) then all us 'conspiracy -theoristas' are going to look pretty daft, because the bbc/press/influencers et al are going to hammer us big time and go all-out to denigrate alt thinking/truthseeking. Further, William, Kate and kids will be reported as 'deeply upset' etc etc and what with Charles being ill with the Big C and all that stuff, and so the preparation for the Online Harms and Safety Bill will roar into overdrive to stop all the 'hate speech'

So, all those who dare to question the Narrative will be guilty by association. All by design.

I do wonder, if this is the case, whether the royals are complicit in this. If it's ever found out that they are, then absolutely they will lose all remaining respect. And my dislike of them will soar to new heights.

If the royals are hedging a plan to do a runner, their PR people would be working flat out to craft a scenario in which to do it that's as different as possible from the real reason they are jittery and if they can reflect a sense of blame for it back on a troublesome sector of the population all the better, a bit of 'divide and conquer' always helps.

[Inversion]

There's clearly a foreboding pattern in regards to the Windsors. In King Charles' coronation the Grim Reaper/Death passes by. During Prince William's wedding a black horse indicating famine bucked its rider. Years ago, QE2 gave a Christmas address and said, "It'll be your last." I can't find a record of that one.

Revelation 6:5–6

When He broke the third seal, I heard the third living creature saying, "Come." I looked, and behold, a black horse; and he who sat on it had a pair of scales in his hand. And I heard something like a voice in the center of the four living creatures saying, "A quart of wheat for a denarius, and three quarts of barley for a denarius; but do not damage the oil and the wine."

Revelation 6:7-8

When he opened the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth living creature saying, “Come and see.” So I looked, and behold, a pale horse. And the name of him who sat on it was Death, and Hades followed with him. And power was given to them over a fourth of the earth, to kill with sword, with hunger, with death, and by the beasts of the earth.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=z6xWJEIK1NE

The Telegraph 04/29/11

[Brigantia]

There are a lot of mentions of Rose Hanbury, Marchioness of Cholmondeley (one of those weird aristo names that is pronounced 'Chumley); for years she is said to have been William's mistress. Kate used to be good friends with her but there was a falling-out about 4 or 5 years ago.

There are links regarding the scandalous side on Angirfan today, she is getting a few mentions in the MSM as well.

[Eric J (Viking)]

Interesting read

Dear Eric J,

'The Mystery of Missing Kate Middleton', by YouTuber, ReallyGraceful gives a timeline of the protracted and anomalous absence of the future Queen of England – ending with the recently photoshopped photo of Kate and her family, posted for Mother's Day by Kensington Palace – and since retracted by major news agencies for being "digitally-manipulated".

The best article on this topic I've seen so far is by Celia Farber, where she starts off, "I hope it goes without saying that this isn’t a 'Royal Watcher' story, but something uniquely strange in our lifetimes."

Celia goes on to suspect that this tableau formed by King Charles' cancer diagnosis, along with the suspected suicide of his cousin's son-in-law, Thomas Kingston and now, the protracted disappearance of his own daughter-in-law, Kate Middleton, that these are all part of a theatrical set piece enacting the orchestrated implosion of the British Monarchy, which began with Harry and Meghan.

As an aside, Thomas Kingston's father-in-law is Prince Edward, the Duke of Kent, who has been the Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England since 1967.


###


TRANSCRIPT

The last time Kate was seen out in public was on on Christmas Day when she went to a service at St Mary Magdalene Church in Norfolk, England.

On January 17th, nearly 3 weeks later, Kensington Palace reported that Kate had undergone stomach surgery at the London Clinic. The specifics in her health were unknown but officials stated that the surgery was successful, in that she was not cancerous. They also stated that she would be in the hospital recovering for 2 weeks. This all led to amusing rumors online that she was getting Brazilian buttlift.

The following day, William was photographed driving away from the hospital where Kate was recuperating from surgery.
But on January 28th, a Spanish journalist broke the story that Kate was in a coma, citing an unnamed "Palace Source". It should be noted that Prince William and Kate's nanny is Spanish and it is assumed that she was the unnamed source and that's why Spanish media got a hold of this story.

Kensington Palace directly addressed these rumors – which they never do – refuting the claims, of course.

But about a week later, on February the 5th, King Charles announced his cancer diagnosis. He was receiving therapy for an enlarged prostate and following his surgery, King Charles III was photographed leaving London clinic.

In contrast, there were no pictures of Kate leaving this clinic, even though it was reported that she had gone back to Windsor, so she could recover at home for at least two or 3 months, according to Kensington Palace authorities.

And they said she wouldn't return to her public duties until after Easter, at the end of March. But this is really weird to me that they didn't get a photo of her leaving the hospital, because it's just crazy, because when Prince Phillip was photographed looking like a shriveled-up raisin; just a corpse, the palace released this jump scare photo of him. How did they let that slide?

On February 25th, the British royal family member, Thomas Kingston died after after a traumatic head wound after attending lunch. The 45-year-old Banker was found with a rifle in a locked building at his parents' home.

A little over a week later, after Thomas Kingston's death, Kate was photographed. TMZ posted a grainy paparazzi photo of Kate in her mother's car and everyone's saying she looks like Katie Holmes or her sister, Pippa because she's missing her mole on her lip.

It gets even stranger, because on March 10th, they released this Mother's Day portrait of Kate and her children. So, after 2 months of recovering from stomach surgery, Kensington Palace released a Mother's Day photo of Kate smiling with her three children. The palace simply stated that the reason why William wasn't in the photo was because he took it – but you'll notice she's not wearing a wedding ring.

This photo was released to give this idea that Kate's happy, the family's happy and it basically was released to settle all these accusations. But the Associated Press and several other photo agencies issued a Kill Order, requesting that their clients remove it from all platforms this was due to worries that the photo had been modified or photoshopped.

And now, Kensington Palace is claiming that Kate said she edited the photo, like she's sitting behind her MacBook at some palace on Photoshop or she's sitting there on the couch on her phone buying the $50 face tune app and editing all this weird stuff in her photo. I don't think so!

In Prince Harry's memoir, where he complains about being rich and Royal, he recalled a situation in this book, an event where his brother, William was behaving violently; abusively towards him, describing the instance where William hit him and wanted Harry to hit him back to make it even, make him feel better.

So, this information, mixed with Kate and William's supposed – allegedly – Spanish Nanny's allegations that William is violent and Kate is in a coma; there's this theory emerging that William beat up on Kate and she's now dead.

There's a rumor that he beat up on Kate after he found out she was having an affair with Thomas Kingston. I don't know. There's a rumor she died from the vaccine. There's a rumor she's tied up with all this little St James Island blackmail, just like prince Andrew – and quite frankly, that's probably not too much of a stretch, because the whole Royal Family caters to people who abuse children on the daily, like Jimmy Savile or Lord Mountbatten.

When Blackmail Island is used to force politicians into supporting wars of conquest and genocide, it is interesting that the royal family seems to be swept up in the net. What could that mean?
And you know, the majority of these public marriages are fake and they don't actually really like each other, anyway, just like Diana and Charles. Arranged, forced – as most Royal marriages throughout history were.

What do y'all think, internet friends?

I don't have a conclusion. I'm not even saying that this is a worthy topic of discussion. It very much feels like a distraction but on this channel, I've discussed the Royal Family frequently, documenting the rise of King Charles and what his inauguration meant for the world, I just had already done the legwork and gossiping with my mother about all this, so I decided to relate it on here, too.

I do think it is important to emphasize the role AI will play in shaping the narrative in the future. That reality can merely be constructed from behind a screen, not just photos but video, as well. So you're gonna have to do a double-take on what they list as "historically accurate", the footage of it.

And they contort the present day to shape the future, so I do think, at some point, photo and video evidence will be hard to uphold in court which is interesting, considering the context of the royal family and their sordid shenanigans.

[Bill Ryan]

Redacted (Natali and Clayton Morris) are now on to this. They streamed this yesterday as part of their daily newscast:

SHOCKING: Royal Family's Secret Exposed! Why are they Hiding Kate Middleton?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=A44bYHxewhE

[happyuk]

Posted by Eric J (Viking) (here)
In Prince Harry's memoir, where he complains about being rich and Royal, he recalled a situation in this book, an event where his brother, William was behaving violently; abusively towards him, describing the instance where William hit him and wanted Harry to hit him back to make it even, make him feel better.

So, this information, mixed with Kate and William's supposed – allegedly – Spanish Nanny's allegations that William is violent and Kate is in a coma; there's this theory emerging that William beat up on Kate and she's now dead.

I've also been thinking along those lines and wouldn't be surprised that he has a lot of unresolved rage.

I mean, have you seen his uncles?
And the fact he lost his mother at a young age in such a violent way, after a divorce.
And he's had to grow up as a royal, and is set to be King
And to top it all his father has cancer..
The list of issues that come with each of those circumstances is extraordinary.

[Brigantia]

There's a lot circulating about William's temper... a couple of years ago I went to a talk by a former Royal Protection Officer who mainly worked with Diana. He said that he often had a job in telling William what to do, and once William sulkily obeyed and said, "when I'm the king, I'll have your head chopped off".

It seems like that's not the only time he said that:

"Prince William: 5 allegations of violence and rage

- “In 2023, royal author Tom Quinn told Fox News that Kate and William ‘have terrible rows where they throw things at each other’”

- “Prince Harry claimed … his brother ‘grabbed me by the collar … and … knocked me to the floor’”

“According to author Robert Lacey's 2020 book … [Camilla] Parker-Bowles confided to family and friends about ‘earth-shattering rows’ between William and then-Prince Charles. [She] is said to have been ‘horrified at the ranting and raving … William had unleashed against her husband …’”

- “William was said to have repeatedly been in trouble as a child for shoving other kids and getting into ‘playground fights’ — so much so his classmates nicknamed him ‘Billy the Basher’”

- “In a separate book by royal writer Tina Brown, Princess Diana describes her eldest son … She wrote: ‘By the time he was four, he had the unattractive habit of yapping at his nanny, Barbara Barnes, “No one tells me what to do! When I am king I will have you punished.””

Source

[norman]

God elp us if the restrainer of a free America falls and allows the world's royals to revert to the old days.

"Off with their heads!"



edit:

actually, when I combine that thought with an image of a modern little monster like this one, it sends a chill through me.

[Brigantia]

The rumour mill regarding Rose Hanbury is really picking up speed; there is a story that her husband the Marquess of Cholmondeley lives in France with his male 'friend' François-Marie Banier. Rose is 25 years younger than her husband and it's reported that friends were amazed at the marriage as they thought him 'not the marrying kind' - a euphemism for someone who is gay.

It sounds just like Charles, Diana and Camilla all over again, history repeating itself. Here's a link to the story in brief that has two links if you want a deep dive.

Source

[Bill Ryan]

Some might be interested to see that Sky News Australia, which pokes relentless entertaining critical fun at the British Royal Family, has 10 of its last 13 videos all about this debacle.

https://youtube.com/@SkyNewsAustralia/videos

[Mari]

Seems that when Kate next appears, she will disclose some information to members of the public at her next engagement, doing it 'her own way' her friends are saying.

Good idea, but she will need to come clean and dispense with any coy-ness about her condition and if there was a mental-health issue involved - even partially (as I still maintain) then she will do the nation, and the whole world a power of good in dragging what is still a taboo subject for many, out into the open.

https://www.times-series.co.uk/news/...c-engagements/

[Brigantia]

Posted by Mari (here)
Seems that when Kate next appears, she will disclose some information to members of the public at her next engagement, doing it 'her own way' her friends are saying.

Good idea, but she will need to come clean and dispense with any coy-ness about her condition and if there was a mental-health issue involved - even partially (as I still maintain) then she will do the nation, and the whole world a power of good in dragging what is still a taboo subject for many, out into the open.

https://www.times-series.co.uk/news/...c-engagements/

It may not be 'when', but 'if' she reappears; my gut feeling is that she may not, I have a bad feeling about what has befallen her. It all feels totally wrong, even evil.

[jaybee]

Posted by Brigantia (here)
There are a lot of mentions of Rose Hanbury, Marchioness of Cholmondeley (one of those weird aristo names that is pronounced 'Chumley); for years she is said to have been William's mistress. Kate used to be good friends with her but there was a falling-out about 4 or 5 years ago.

There are links regarding the scandalous side on Angirfan today, she is getting a few mentions in the MSM as well.

Maybe it really was Kate who photoshopped the infamous Mother's Day pic and just did a bad job of it - but the main thing was that she got rid of her wedding ring and it wasn't spotted at first - perhaps the purpose was to take a swipe at William, embarrass him and let the public know their marriage is in trouble...?