I videoed the weirdest UAP a few nights ago.

[RatRodRob...RRR]

UAP, the weirdest twinkling lights seen by me right EXACTLY where the moon would come out from behind clouds, that was freaky too.

I thought this was around midnight, but my wife said it was closer to 3am, i admit that i had been building model cars and had drank a few bourbons "too many" in the process, i dont even remember when/how i first saw these lights, but i do remember filming them on my ph.

When i went inside i saw my wife, she had got up to go to the dunny.
I showed her the video and we went outside so i could show her where in the sky this happened .

Anyway hears hoping i can upload the vid now.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=HeBrCf602Xc

RRR

[Mike Gorman]

You know I have been seeing an uptick in lights and apparent craft that I simply cannot account for, this is in the Perth urban districts, I have seen one particular craft twice now, it is kind of crescent shaped, it is moving at about 150 MPH and is very brightly lit up but not in conventional aeronautical lights, it moves with a deliberate motion from the hills in the east overhead and towards the ocean - the second time I saw this craft I called out my associate to come outside and tell me what this was, she made it outside just as the craft was directly overhead and I could see the cognitive dissonance in action on her face: what is that, I said...I dunno was the reply!
Strangely I asked my associate about this incident recently and she could not recall it, it had become a blurry memory....interesting hey?
Anyway, I have also seen what many folks would say are satellites, but they vanish midflight, just disappear when they should continue to the horizon if they were indeed satellites!
I have related my sighting of a very black craft that was hovering very high up over Fremantle - I watched this one for about 15 minutes, or more. It had an organic quality and was changing its actual form very rapidly as though this represented 'intelligence', seemed to be gathering and processing information...yes there is a lot going on up there in these times.
***I would add that the first craft I mention was totally silent, no engine noises nothing****

[s7e6e]

Very interesting, although I miss the days when we all used the same designation for these things: UFOs

[Sunny-side-up]

Hello Rob.

Could you upload a daytime image of the same area of sky, showing the horizon and any trees etc

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by s7e6e (here)
Very interesting, although I miss the days when we all used the same designation for these things: UFOs

Among old school researchers the name has not gone away. In fact, a good metric of where, how (and with whom) a researcher stands, is whether they use the term UFO or UAP.

The term "UAP" is politically correct rebranding invented by the powers that be.

The motivation? To steer inquisitive "norms" away from the inconvenient historical reality of UFOs (and eighty years of SECRECY, LIES and COVER-UP) and onto a new, pre-arranged and carefully constructed narrative, one that's controlled not by UFO researchers but the Military Industrial Complex themselves.

They're trying to make "UAPs" the new bogeyman. Kicker is, the UAPs they want us to concentrate on are not alien, but ours! In other words, they're drones (think the Tic-Tac sighting). Remote-controlled, highly advanced, back-engineered drones, constructed from alien tech.

The powers that be
(A) control these UAP/drones (man-made UFOs make up the majority of 'phenomena' in our skies)
(B) may even shoot down their own drones to "frame" a story
(C) currently control all observation, analysis, and media reporting of UAPs (every pundit or "expert" on TV is an intelligence asset, usually (ex)CIA

When you control the phenomenon, and when you control the reporting of the phenomenon, you control both sides. And civilian UFO researchers get frozen out, along with eighty years of SECRECY, LIES, and COVER-UP.

In Summary
When they use the word "UAP", they're talking about man-made drones dressed up to be an alien threat. These are fake UFOs used by fake people to roll-out fake Disclosure.

Don't buy into it!

And never use that word.

It's

UFOs



Always has been, always will be!!!

(or flying saucer if you prefer).

[ExomatrixTV]

Best UFO footages are in my view:

• 01. With more reference points, we can analyze!

• 02. More than 1 camera recording the same object/phenomenon/anomaly

• 03. If local news reports that discusses what is filmed would be great!

• 04. More independent witnesses from multiple angles of the same object/phenomenon/anomaly.

• 05. Police reports (like official 911 calls or any other emergency call numbers in other countries).

• 06. Detection of magnetic anomalies/interferences using compass or other EMF detection equipment .... or better using: RTL-SDR Spectrum Analyzer SDR USB Dongle with GQRX

• 07. Knowing the exact time/location data of the object/phenomenon/anomaly to be added to look for where the Moon, Venus, Jupiter etc. etc. was positioned, what the weather conditions were etc. etc.

• 08. Having access to military flight-radar logs like this click on "U" button on the top (first button, to toggle between all planes & military planes) click on "replay" button right side on lowest button! ... So that you can see if anything was near or present on that spot (time & location needed, of course!).

• 09. Understanding what (possible CCD-chip) video artifacts are, knowing the limitations of your camera, filming known light objects in the sky to test how it may distort in darker conditions. Understanding ANYTHING that can interfere to what is filmed (these insights are not meant to deny real UFOs, but rather to rule certain things out to raise the quality of your assessments).

• 10. Study why I made this list, and how it is valuable for real research!

All 10 points I just shared here from the tip of my head (I can make much more!) are not made to "deny" anything ... it is pure to raise the quality of genuine authentic UFO/UAP research!



cheers,
John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳
June 19th, 2024

* Researching UFOs/UAPs for 35 years now, including writing UFO articles, organizing big international (sold out) UFO conferences, giving 80+ UFO lectures in 5 countries, interviewing many other UFO researchers/authors for my Radio/TV shows in Amsterdam, been on Dutch 🇳🇱 National TV multiple times discussing UFOs, co-founder of "Skepisiswatchers" debunking "UFO debunkers" (pseudoskeptics) and so much more!

[Sunny-side-up]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)
Best UFO footages are in my view:

• 01. With more reference points, we can analyze!

• 02. More than 1 camera recording the same object/phenomenon/anomaly

• 03. If local news reports that discusses what is filmed would be great!

• 04. More independent witnesses from multiple angles of the same object/phenomenon/anomaly.

• 05. Police reports (like official 911 calls or any other emergency call numbers in other countries).

• 06. Detection of magnetic anomalies/interferences using compass or other EMF detection equipment .... or better using: RTL-SDR Spectrum Analyzer SDR USB Dongle with GQRX

• 07. Knowing the exact time/location data of the object/phenomenon/anomaly to be added to look for where the Moon, Venus, Jupiter etc. etc. was positioned, what the weather conditions were etc. etc.

• 08. Having access to military flight-radar logs like this click on "U" button on the top (first button, to toggle between all planes & military planes) click on "replay" button right side on lowest button! ... So that you can see if anything was near or present on that spot (time & location needed, of course!).

• 09. Understanding what (possible CCD-chip) video artifacts are, knowing the limitations of your camera, filming known light objects in the sky to test how it may distort in darker conditions. Understanding ANYTHING that can interfere to what is filmed (these insights are not meant to deny real UFOs, but rather to rule certain things out to raise the quality of your assessments).

• 10. Study why I made this list, and how it is valuable for real research!

All 10 points I just shared here from the tip of my head (I can make much more!) are not made to "deny" anything ... it is pure to raise the quality of genuine authentic UFO/UAP research!



cheers,
John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳
June 19th, 2024

Ill second/Bump that John

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
...

Dear @Mark (Star Mariner), I get what you are saying, and many other UFO researchers will say the same ... and see the (possible) "psychological warfare" tactics too ... but:

• WHY I USE (and have used) THE TERM: "U.A.P.s" besides U.F.O.s BEFORE THEY DID!

I research UFOs/UAPs intensively for 34 years now (organized several sold out International UFO Conferences), yes even: "UAPs" because that term was known to me thanks to a man specializes in 3300+ UFOs reported by Pilots worldwide ... Former Nasa Scientist (retired 1988) Dr. Richard F. Haines PhD who interviewed many Pilots, and he also was part of helping Pilots how to deal with the FAA.

Using Pilot UFO Sightings to report "Near Accidents/Near Collisions" with Unknown Flying Objects having no transponder code on ... Because there was huge stigma attached to the word "UFO" which causes many pilots not to report these encounters, was the main reason to use the term U.A.P. since the early/mid 1990s ... Yes, you read that right ... The term "U.A.P. was already in use within the Nasa/FAA/Pilot UFO Sightings world!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=yfF6Fb4WhwQ

• archiveswest.orbiscascade.org/ark:80444/xv847688
• airsafe.com/issues/uap.htm

Example of an old "U.A.P. Sighting" reported by pilots:

• narcap.org

• Dr. Richard F. Haines Live 1988 (15:15 in to the video) seen by millions worldwide 36 years ago ... I used that section for my UFO lecture at our first International UFO Conference in Amsterdam 🇳🇱 November 20th, 1992.

• Dr. Richard Haines introduced the term "UAP" long before it became a hype ... studying 3000+ UFO-reports coming solely from Pilots!

Interview with NARCAP founder Dr. Richard Haines:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=s9NkwzdMicg

This is the definition of “Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, or UAP” as offered by a NARCAP founding member and former NARCAP Science Chief Dr. Richard Haines in 1980 and applied by NARCAP.org since 1999:

““An Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, UAP, is the visual stimulus that provokes a sighting report of an object or light seen in the sky, the appearance and/or flight dynamics of which do not suggest a logical, conventional flying object and which remains unidentified after close scrutiny of all available evidence by persons who are technically capable of making both a technical identification as well as a common sense identification, if one is possible.” (Haines, PP 13-22, 1980)

When NARCAP was founded in 1999 we adopted the term “Unidentified Aerial Phenomena or UAP” because we felt that it was a far more accurate term for the many profiles of unidentified aerial phenomena, some of which were described as lights rather than objects, and had not been co-opted by the “UFO community” as a term for “alien space ships” in the way the term “UFO” has been. Many of our international partners had already adopted the term in some form or variation. A simple review of the internet archives will show that at the time NARCAP was founded the term “UAP” was not in use. Once NARCAP began publishing papers and promoting “UAP” as an objective term the UFO community in general picked it up and the term “UAP” has been in use ever since. Recently, the United States Navy adopted the term.

Over the years since we have encountered some steady misunderstandings regarding the terms “Unidentified Aerial Phenomena” or U.A.P. and “Unidentified Flying Object” or UFO. One of the most common misunderstandings is that either term is in reference to something that could not be identified therefore it could be anything. This is exactly not correct. Both terms are intended to convey that in cases where there is enough information that an identification can be made by those most qualified to do so and yet an identification can not be made the phenomenon responsible can be considered “unidentified”. It is the best documented cases of unidentified aerial phenomena that remain in the dataset if one adheres to this definition and scores cases correctly.

So when correctly applying the term “UAP” one is saying that the incident/phenomenon in question has been documented very well and that data was subjected to the most qualified technical scrutiny and that the conclusion of that analysis is that the incident/phenomenon can not be identified. When NARCAP uses these terms in a published report that is exactly the meaning and application of the terms “UAP” and “UFO” .

• Dr. Richard F. Haines (NASA) - 3000+ Pilot Sightings

“UFOs Are Not Aggressive,” Says Senior Former NASA Scientist

In an interview on unidentified aerial phenomena, Dr. Richard F. Haines explains that several features can be distinguished when observing UFO phenomena. One is that when UFOs approach our planes, they show curiosity and interest, not a desire to attack. UFOs and aliens are usually feared. It comes from pop culture and films. But does this evidence of the UFO phenomenon indicate what we should be afraid of? Former NASA Senior Scientist Dr. Richard F. Haines spoke about the UFO phenomenon, focusing on the observations of more than 3,000+ pilots. He spoke about the phenomenon and how these objects, which are constantly observed, behave.

These objects were spotted and tracked on radar, making maneuvers beyond the power of any known artificial mechanism, while moving at unreachable speeds. Another common theme is that these objects approach human airplanes and behave similarly to curiosity, Dr. Haynes explains.

For example, in the case of military aircraft, pilots observe how critical electronic capabilities, such as the ability to launch missiles, are disabled when they are near these objects. One notable example comes from the Iranian encounter of fighters with UFOs in 1976, when the weapons systems of several jet aircraft went out of order. Dr. Haynes explains that in 50 percent of the cases he has encountered, these objects are approaching our planes, and not vice versa. Haynes goes on to say that UFOs appear to be making evasive maneuvers to avoid our planes so as not to create a potential collision. This portion of the interview reminds the following quote from General Nathan Twining in 1947. “The phenomenon reported is something real, not a vision or fiction … Reported performance characteristics such as extreme climb rates, maneuverability, and actions to be considered as avoidance upon detection or contact with friendly aircraft and radars, suggest that some of the objects are controlled manually, automatically or remotely. ” Dr. Haines is currently Chief Scientist for NARCAP, an organization that has been investigating, documenting and analyzing aviation security and UFO sightings and incidents since 1999.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=uNYEOvskxWQ

Dr. Haines has recorded over 3,000 pilot reports, many of which he has personally investigated.

He has also investigated numerous aviation accidents and incidents for the U.S. Federal Aviation Authority and attorneys.

He serves on the Safety and the Human Factors Committees of the Aerospace Medical Association and is a member of the International Society of Air Safety Investigators.
Dr. Haines has written Three Scientific (UAP) Books on UFO topics and over 50 Scientific and Technical Articles as well as 20 serious articles on unidentified aerial phenomena.

Brief Biography:

Richard F. Haines was born and raised in Seattle, Washington, and attended the University of Washing ton (College of Engineering) and Pacific Lutheran College (Tacoma) where he received the B.A. degree in 1960. He was awarded the M.A. and Ph.D. from Michigan State University (East Lansing) in 1962 and 1964, respectively, in the field of Experimental Psychology.

After working at NASA-Ames from 1967 - 1986 as a research scientist in numerous astronautical (Gemini, Apollo, Skylab, Space Station) and aeronautical (e.g., Mgr. of the Joint FAA/NASA Head-up Display Program, landing simulation research) projects, he was appointed Chief of the Space Human Factors Office at NASA-Ames (1986-1988) where he directed research and development efforts of the AX-5 "hard" EVA space suit, habitability design research for Space Station Freedom, and spacecraft window design.

He retired from government service in 1988 and taught at San Jose State University as an Associate Professor of Psychology while working part time as a scientist in the Research Institute for Advanced Computer Science. From 1990-1991 he has provided consulting services to NASA in various laboratory activities related to supersonic wind tunnel automation redesign and Space Station Freedom - to - ground bandwidth image transmission reduction.

His interest in UFO phenomena spans over 20 years with special interests in sightings by pilots, analysis of photographic evidence, and data on Close Encounters of the Fourth Kind. He claims that, "these three areas contain the type of data that will bring us to a successful discovery of the core nature of the phenomena.

Samples of published works:

Review Of Selected Sightings From Aircraft From 1973 - 1978 - Dr. Richard Haines (1979)
Review of Selected Aerial Phenomenon Sightings From Aircraft From 1942 - 1952 - Haines (1983)
Fifty-Six Aircraft Pilot Sightings Involving E-M Effects - Richard F. Haines (1992)
UFO Phenomena and the Behavioral Scientist (Editor)
Observing UFOs
Melbourne Episode - Case Study of a Missing Pilot
Advanced Aerial Devices Reported During the Korean War

• narcap.org
  

Richard F. Haines Scientific Ufology Papers Collection

Scope and Contents

The Richard F. Haines Ufology papers includes documents that cover the period between the 1970s and 2010s. It includes personal and professional correspondence, administrative documents of NARCAP and drafts of its research projects, Haines' own drafts and printouts for conference presentations. It also contains a large set of UFO photos with notes and photo analysis, and well as audio tapes with interviews of UFO witnesses. The audio cassettes have been digitized and once completed, will be filed on the Woodson Research Center's nearline server, and accessible by request. The recordings will also be transcribed.

• archives.library.rice.edu/repositories/2/resources/1404

• Dr. Richard F. Haines Live 1988 (15:15 in to the video) seen by millions worldwide 36 years ago ... I used that section for my UFO lecture at our first International UFO Conference in Amsterdam 🇳🇱 November 20th, 1992.

• Dr. Richard Haines introduced the term "UAP" long before it became a hype ... studying 3000+ UFO-reports coming solely from Pilots!

• See also this.
  

cheers,
John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳

[Denise/Dizi]

I believe there were two reasons they gave "Ufo's" the title of UAP's.. One being, when doing a FOIA, the term would be wrong, and nothing would result of a search under that term, and secondly, they were not "Flying" at all, but more, using an advanced form of antigravity technologies that did not use engines for their propulsion systems, instead, they had found methods of eliminating the mass before them, and moving into that space...

Essentially creating a "gravity well" that allowed them to merely fall forward at incredible speeds that we could not reach using traditional engine systems. Mitigate the repelling force, and you have then just to worry about how far ahead of you you repel the obstacle... And create enough thrust to propel yourself forward... Which really doesn't take much... Given there would be zero resistance.

I am fairly certain that all newer "Aircraft" also have some sort of air cancelling technologies as well, which repels the force of the air slowing down the motion of the craft, plane, drone or jet, from moving faster in the earth's atmosphere as well. Whether it be by electricity, static, magnetics, or something else. I do believe they have this technology as well, and also use it to negate the water environment submarines operate within. And I believe they were trying to create such technologies even back in the days of Hughes aircraft...



But I must admit I don't know what I don't know... But I think we all have come to the conclusion that there are extremely advanced systems, within our own fleet of aircraft, and UAP... Alien or not, we have it.

[ExomatrixTV]

My very first UFO Encounter was in June/July 1990 (being 24 years old, and it happened during my job at Night ±01:40 AM as a Security Officer) in Amsterdam park called: Gaasperplas with a big & very deep lake.

• Shortly after my own encounter I decided to form/create a UFO Work Group with a genuine UFO "Hotline" a phone-number being promoted all over the media (locally and nationally).

Gave many UFO lectures and wrote articles for our "Exposure Magazine" that later became "Frontier Magazine" both co-founded by me.

• John Kuhles LIVE (uncensored) on Dutch 🇳🇱 National TV, 1994:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=kX9-1TOjrXQ

(soon translated with English 🇬🇧 subtitles!)

A Dutch 🇳🇱 National Newspaper & "Dutch 🇳🇱 National Talk-show called: "Lijn 5 Live" (35 minutes uncensored discussion with Mariska Hulscher + open lines for questions from the viewers ... Produced by IDTV (wiki - linkedin) ... She asked me to analyze, study & discuss a camera footage filming Triangle UFO with pulsating center from green to purple to blue to orange etc. filmed by a German 🇩🇪 being in The Netherlands 🇳🇱 near the border (Kerkrade, South Limburg) on a high rise building rooftops! ... On the same day, 2 Police Officers saw exactly the same object at the same place and same time.

As you can see in the title of this Project Avalon forum thread, my UFO encounter during the "UFO Wave" 1989-1991.

• So much weirdness happened to me being in the spotlight several times in the Dutch mass media discussing UFOs ... I can easily write a book about it.

Maybe it is time I just do it ...

• Me 1996 on Dutch 🇳🇱 National TV and Local TV Amsterdam

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by aoibhghaire (here)
The confusion about the UAP issue

• The term "U.A.P." was already in use since early 1990s ... see my contribution here

Some of the confusion might be the first letter: "U" of the acronym U.A.P.:

U, among others, could (in a totally legit way) stand for:

• Unexplained
• Unusual
• Unidentified
• Unknown
• Uncharted
• Unfamiliar
• Unrecognized
• Uncommon
• Unconventional
• Unexpected
• Unclassified
• Unaccounted
• Unprecedented
• Unacknowledged

Anomalous, Aerial or Airborne

Phenomena/Phenomenon >>> which has a more elusive/transmutative meaning compared to the original official USAF term UFO: "O" of a physical "Object"

Hillary Clinton 2016 1:11 (1 minute and 11 seconds in to this mainstream media: video discussing the term: "U.A.P." 8 years ago!, which at the time was not new to me).

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=uPb-_fUp2ME

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=vihsxy36KPs

The opinion of the last video at the end ... is just that: an opinion >>> no real evidence of his accusatory claim was given.

• Wikipedia quote:

"In later life, Laurance Rockefeller became interested in UFOs. In 1993, along with his niece, Anne Bartley, the stepdaughter of Winthrop Rockefeller and the then-president of the Rockefeller Family Fund, he established the UFO Disclosure Initiative to the Clinton White House. They asked for all UFO information held by the government, including from the CIA and the US Air Force, to be declassified and released to the public. The first and most important test case where declassification had to apply, according to Rockefeller, was the Roswell UFO incident. In September 1994, the Air Force categorically denied the incident was UFO-related. Rockefeller briefed Clinton on the results of his initiative in 1995. Clinton did produce an Executive Order in late 1994 to declassify numerous documents in the National Archives, but this did not specifically refer to UFO-related files.[9]".

• source
• Laurance Rockefeller, early funder of Dr. John E. Mack’s work, dies at 94 in 2004
  
• 2 months later, Dr. John E. Mack died too in a car accident in London!
  

Hillary Clinton 2016 1:11 (1 minute and 11 seconds in to this mainstream media: video discussing the term: "U.A.P." 8 years ago!, which at the time was not new to me).

cheers,
John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)
Using Pilot UFO Sightings to report "Near Accidents/Near Collisions" with Unknown Flying Objects having no transponder code on ... Because there was huge stigma attached to the word "UFO" which causes many pilots not to report these encounters, was the main reason to use the term U.A.P. since the early/mid 1990s ...

I know very well mate. I too was roving the UFO circuit with Birdsall (both of them), Tony Dodd, Quest International et al, back in those days (were you at the International UFO Conference in Bristol in early '91? - which we helped organise), and I recall "UAP" as a term used in aviation circles. But since then, you will notice, Intelligence/Military/Security services have made it their special pet name, being far more palatable than "UFOs" (which makes them uncomfortable) as it perfectly suits the n e w narrative,

"UAPs" really leapt from obscurity with AATIP (Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program) which came out of the Pentagon, but we know the CIA were behind that pack of lies. It continued into successive offices (each more ridiculously named than the last), such as AARO (All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office), ODNI (Office of the Director of National Intelligence), and AOIMSG (Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group).

All I'm saying is, if "UAP" is favoured by the same criminal organization responsible for eighty-plus years of UFO secrecy (whilst withholding black technology that could totally transform our world) I want nothing to do with it, or them! We should all of us baulk at every single gosh darn thing that slips from their forked tongue!

[RatRodRob...RRR]

Posted by Mike Gorman (here)
You know I have been seeing an uptick in lights and apparent craft that I simply cannot account for, this is in the Perth urban districts, I have seen one particular craft twice now, it is kind of crescent shaped, it is moving at about 150 MPH and is very brightly lit up but not in conventional aeronautical lights, it moves with a deliberate motion from the hills in the east overhead and towards the ocean - the second time I saw this craft I called out my associate to come outside and tell me what this was, she made it outside just as the craft was directly overhead and I could see the cognitive dissonance in action on her face: what is that, I said...I dunno was the reply!
Strangely I asked my associate about this incident recently and she could not recall it, it had become a blurry memory....interesting hey?
Anyway, I have also seen what many folks would say are satellites, but they vanish midflight, just disappear when they should continue to the horizon if they were indeed satellites!
I have related my sighting of a very black craft that was hovering very high up over Fremantle - I watched this one for about 15 minutes, or more. It had an organic quality and was changing its actual form very rapidly as though this represented 'intelligence', seemed to be gathering and processing information...yes there is a lot going on up there in these times.
***I would add that the first craft I mention was totally silent, no engine noises nothing****

hey Mike how ya goin.
Sounds like youve had a fair share of sightings, and yes, there is an uptick in sightings, for those that look up atleast.
Ive had 4 sightings in the last 2yrs , and i believe that once you have had an unmistakable uap/ufo sighting, you will get to see more, like the flood gates have opened......RRR

[RatRodRob...RRR]

Posted by s7e6e (here)
Very interesting, although I miss the days when we all used the same designation for these things: UFOs

Gday s7e6e, i also prefer "UFO' rather than "UAP" , but this sighting wasnt "unidentified Flying object" , it wasnt flying like some kind of physical craft, it was like a non material sighting made of light, or plasma etc etc.
I think that "Unidentified Ariel Phenomena" is a better discription.. ...............................RRR

[RatRodRob...RRR]

Posted by Sunny-side-up (here)
Hello Rob.

Could you upload a daytime image of the same area of sky, showing the horizon and any trees etc

Hi SSU, i dont know how to post a pic on this site so ill take a video instead................................ RRR

[Sunny-side-up]

I used to call them 'OAP' observed area phenomenon, or as a joke 'Old Age Pensioners' seeing as they have been around for so long 0.o

Thanks Rob, look forward to seeing it.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by RatRodRob...RRR (here)
I think that "Unidentified Ariel Phenomena" is a better discription.. ...............................RRR

It might well be a better, more rounded description, in the same vein C.E (Common Era) / B.C.E (Before Common Era) is the preferred, more 'politically correct' way to do it. But, like "UAP", I reject these terms on the same general principle, sticking to B.C. (Before Christ) and A.D. (Anno Domini).

When terminology is changed always ask yourself why. A common-sense reason often sits on the surface, but what lies beneath it? What's the agenda really?

[TrumanCash]

I think that in spite or the origination of the term UAP it appears to me to be a change in the mainstream to steer the narrative of the PTB. I prefer UFO over UAP.

However, from my perspective of having been abducted many, many, many times and seeing a "UFO" before and after abductions, they are not UFOs or UAPs--they are identified (at least by me). So I would use terms like (Identified Alien Craft) or more appropriately ISTVs (Identified Space/Time Vessels). As Denise pointed out, they are not "flying". They manipulate space and time in a way that appears to be flying.

BTW, I have never recovered any memories of being abducted by US-built craft, only by Grays, Mantis, Reptilians and Anunnaki. Even in my deep underground military base abduction it was Grays craft, not US-made.

This is one of the meanings of the two serpents coiled around a staff called a "caduceus". The two snakes are 180 degrees out of phase, thus cancelling each other out but creating a tertiary effect. In this case it is a phenomenon that alters space and time. It explains the ability of these craft to move through time as well as space. Of course, there are actually many meanings attached to the caduceus.

I first learned about this in the mid-90s on KeelyNet where there is a real electronic device called a caduceus coil--a metallic or magnetic rod with a wire wrapped around itself 180 degress that exhibits both time and space alterations when various microwave frequencies are pulsed into it. I had a scientist friend who was building one.

[RatRodRob...RRR]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)
My very first UFO Encounter was in July 1990 (being 24 years old, and it happened during my job at Night ±01:40 AM as a Security Officer) in Amsterdam park called: Gaasperplas with a big & very deep lake.

• Shortly after my own encounter I decided to form/create a UFO Work Group with a genuine UFO "Hotline" a phone-number being promoted all over the media (locally and nationally).

Gave many UFO lectures and wrote articles for our "Exposure Magazine" that later became "Frontier Magazine" both co-founded by me.

• John Kuhles LIVE (uncensored) on Dutch 🇳🇱 National TV, 1994:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=kX9-1TOjrXQ

(soon translated with English 🇬🇧 subtitles!)

A Dutch 🇳🇱 National Newspaper & "Dutch 🇳🇱 National Talk-show called: "Lijn 5 Live" (35 minutes uncensored discussion with Mariska Hulscher + open lines for questions from the viewers ... Produced by IDTV (wiki - linkedin) ... She asked me to analyze, study & discuss a camera footage filming Triangle UFO with pulsating center from green to purple to blue to orange etc. filmed by a German 🇩🇪 being in The Netherlands 🇳🇱 near the border (Kerkrade, South Limburg) on a high rise building rooftops! ... On the same day, 2 Police Officers saw exactly the same object at the same place and same time.

As you can see in the title of this Project Avalon forum thread, my UFO encounter during the "UFO Wave" 1989-1991.

• So much weirdness happened to me being in the spotlight several times in the Dutch mass media discussing UFOs ... I can easily write a book about it.

Maybe it is time I just do it ...

Bugga, CC closed captions wont translate to English, i did notice in the video, they spell your last name differently. good vid btw.

RRR

[RatRodRob...RRR]

Posted by Sunny-side-up (here)
I used to call them 'OAP' observed area phenomenon, or as a joke 'Old Age Pensioners' seeing as they have been around for so long 0.o

Thanks Rob, look forward to seeing it.

Hey SSU, i did it, now lets hope i can upload it.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=iWUILMre19M

RRR