*** Trump Shot (but safe) *** Live Now on all News Channels

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by Tintin (here)
..and just when things couldn't get even stranger now there's a claim a UFO was seen, and recorded, at the Butler rally.......

Depending on the FPS settings of the used camera ... you most likely witnessed someone filming a bug (insect), everybody can test for themselves and compare the results in super slow-motion especially 60FPS or higher!

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1814637430110077194

For those readers who don't already Follow Mr. @TonySeruga perhaps you should.

He and his team have been about a mile ahead of legacy media on the PA shooter and they specialize in mobile data analysis.

A 97 minute meeting at a place called the Bullseye ...

— Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) July 20, 2024

[Tintin]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

Posted by Tintin (here)
..and just when things couldn't get even stranger now there's a claim a UFO was seen, and recorded, at the Butler rally.......

Depending on the FPS settings of the used camera ... you most likely witnessed someone filming a bug (insect), everybody can test for themselves and compare the results in super slow-motion especially 60FPS or higher!

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

I doubt it John. It flies behind the flag. It'd have to be bloody large insect!!

----------------------

Reposting from here:

Something can most certainly be seen looking very much like a UFO flying in right > left at the 44 second mark. Focus on the cloud to the right of the flag:

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by Tintin (here)
It'd have to be bloody large insect!!

You can throw a small marble from left to right (or right to left) in front of your camera and then watch it in slow motion, looking like (appearing) like a bowling ball in size (or bigger). A bird could appear to have the same size as a airplane on a 2D screen ... does not mean they are the same size!

Anything that moves (depending on the speed shutter) can look stretched too, when watching in slow-motion!

• Believe it or not, I studied 1000s of UFO footages last 34 years using all kinds of software & hardware, having used all kinds of cameras too. (over 7!) only a tiny few are super fasictaing! ... Maybe I sould make a special on that topic alone.

BEST UFO FOOTAGES ARE THOSE WHO ARE RECORDED BY MULTIPLE DIFFERENT CAMERAS FROM MULTIPLE DIFFERENT ANGLES!

Like: doorbell cameras, body cam cameras, security camers, sattelte cameras, dashboard cameras, professional tv cameras and on and on and on ...

Mexico Live UFO Footages from July 11, 1991 short before, during and after solar eclipse, is a beautiful example.

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[norman]

Unless something is original live footage I'm not messing with the bottom feeder stuff. It's blatantly obvious to me now that the scramble and chaos squad is diving in hard.

Remember the old wisdom from the Ufology world when it was still the real thing?;

There are two ways to keep a secret.

1) if you control all the parameters you can put a lid over it and tell no one anything.

2) if you DON'T control all the parameters, you generate a huge amount similar looking noise in the truthersphere to camouflage the truth.

[Tintin]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

Posted by Tintin (here)
It'd have to be bloody large insect!!

You can throw a small marble from left to right (or right to left) in front of your camera and then watch it in slow motion, looking like (appearing) like a bowling ball in size (or bigger). A bird could appear to have the same size as a airplane on a 2D screen ... does not mean they are the same size!

Anything that moves (depending on the speed shutter) can look stretched too, when watching in slow-motion!


cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

Blimey, okay, and I don't really want to be labouring a point here. Be that as it may, I simply want folks to watch the video very closely. That isn't an insect in the video

[Bill Ryan]

I don't think this audio analysis by Mike Adams has been posted yet. It's a follow-up to Chris Martenson's already well-circulated video (which has now had over 460k views). Mike does a good job, explaining his calculations very clearly.

His logic is hard to refute, and I can see that this is pretty straightforward for anyone with experience of analyzing the audio of any kind of gunshot. And this must now be known, probably as early as Sunday or Monday, by any 'official' investigators.

https://brighteon.com/a2ec2cff-0d92-...9-e1fa9eb3fb09

Source: https://www.brighteon.com/embed/a2ec2cff-0d92-4870-9629-e1fa9eb3fb09

[mountain_jim]

I don't think this audio analysis by Mike Adams has been posted yet.

Satori commented on one of my posts but did not post link to video

Mike Adams does a very good forensic acoustic analysis of, by his reckoning, the 7 incoming shots. That is, the incoming rounds. “Crack-boom.” The bullets intended for the target are well within the range of all three locations and the bullets are traveling much faster than the speed of sound. Thus , the bullets pass by some, and arrive somewhere else for others, in the target area and make the “crack” sound followed immediately by the “report” sound. That is, the “boom” sound from the barrel of the weapon. You can hear this in the audio.

He concludes that shots were fired from three different locations.

I do recommend listening to Adam’s analysis on his programs. Brighteon is typically a good place to visit.

[Tintin]

This might be useful as a visual of the rally site at Butler filmed by an AP (Associated Press) drone while what looks like the clean-up (cover-up) is still ongoing.



Sourced from Collin Rugg on X

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
I don't think this audio analysis by Mike Adams has been posted yet. It's a follow-up to Chris Martenson's already well-circulated video (which has now had over 460k views). Mike does a good job, explaining his calculations very clearly.

His logic is hard to refute, and I can see that this is pretty straightforward for anyone with experience of analyzing the audio of any kind of gunshot. And this must now be known, probably as early as Sunday or Monday, by any 'official' investigators.

https://brighteon.com/a2ec2cff-0d92-...9-e1fa9eb3fb09

Source: https://www.brighteon.com/embed/a2ec2cff-0d92-4870-9629-e1fa9eb3fb09

Here's a follow-up Tweet from Mike Adams, now having measured the water tower distance. He concludes that shot #6 could indeed have come from the water tower, but that shot #7 was from almost twice as far away.

The text:

I am measuring the water tower at approx. 760 feet from Trump's podium. This distance could be consistent with the audio forensics signature of round #6, which has a snap/boom delay of 0.366 seconds. But it also means that round #7 was fired from BEYOND the water tower distance.

~~~

https://x.com/HealthRanger/status/1814365747751333924

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/_emergent_/status/1814525297900790219

Sen Josh Hawley: “Today when I went to that site, the FBI had more security on that site now than they did the night Trump was shot.”

“They tried to kick me off of the site.”

They don't need that many to investigate, but they do to prevent anyone else from doing so.

— Emergent Perspective (@_emergent_) July 20, 2024

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
I don't think this audio analysis by Mike Adams has been posted yet. It's a follow-up to Chris Martenson's already well-circulated video (which has now had over 460k views). Mike does a good job, explaining his calculations very clearly.

His logic is hard to refute, and I can see that this is pretty straightforward for anyone with experience of analyzing the audio of any kind of gunshot. And this must now be known, probably as early as Sunday or Monday, by any 'official' investigators.

https://brighteon.com/a2ec2cff-0d92-...9-e1fa9eb3fb09

Source: https://www.brighteon.com/embed/a2ec2cff-0d92-4870-9629-e1fa9eb3fb09

Here's a follow-up Tweet from Mike Adams, now having measured the water tower distance. He concludes that shot #6 could indeed have come from the water tower, but that shot #7 was from almost twice as far away.

The text:

I am measuring the water tower at approx. 760 feet from Trump's podium. This distance could be consistent with the audio forensics signature of round #6, which has a snap/boom delay of 0.366 seconds. But it also means that round #7 was fired from BEYOND the water tower distance.

~~~

https://x.com/HealthRanger/status/1814365747751333924

A reasonable hypothesis:

1. Crooks was compelled to start shooting as soon as he realized he'd been spotted face-to-face by the officer who looked over the roof at him before he dropped back down again.
2. The other two shooters (shots #6 and #7) then had to take their quick chance as well, when they saw the consternation and SS action on the stage.
3. It's possible (as Mike Adams notes) that shots #4 and #5 came from a similar distance as Crooks, but from a slightly different angle and with a different gun, maybe from an open window in one of the nearby buildings. (If so, that means four shooters.)

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/catturd2/status/1814612151388004400

Just when you think you can hate this little evil demon more.
— Catturd ™ (@catturd2) July 20, 2024

[Tintin]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
I don't think this audio analysis by Mike Adams has been posted yet. It's a follow-up to Chris Martenson's already well-circulated video (which has now had over 460k views). Mike does a good job, explaining his calculations very clearly.

His logic is hard to refute, and I can see that this is pretty straightforward for anyone with experience of analyzing the audio of any kind of gunshot. And this must now be known, probably as early as Sunday or Monday, by any 'official' investigators.

https://brighteon.com/a2ec2cff-0d92-...9-e1fa9eb3fb09

Source: https://www.brighteon.com/embed/a2ec2cff-0d92-4870-9629-e1fa9eb3fb09

Here's a follow-up Tweet from Mike Adams, now having measured the water tower distance. He concludes that shot #6 could indeed have come from the water tower, but that shot #7 was from almost twice as far away.

The text:

I am measuring the water tower at approx. 760 feet from Trump's podium. This distance could be consistent with the audio forensics signature of round #6, which has a snap/boom delay of 0.366 seconds. But it also means that round #7 was fired from BEYOND the water tower distance.

~~~

https://x.com/HealthRanger/status/1814365747751333924

A reasonable hypothesis:

1. Crooks was compelled to start shooting as soon as he realized he'd been spotted face-to-face by the officer who looked over the roof at him before he dropped back down again.
2. The other two shooters (shots #6 and #7) then had to take their quick chance as well, when they saw the consternation and SS action on the stage.
3. It's possible (as Mike Adams notes) that shots #4 and #5 came from a similar distance as Crooks, but from a slightly different angle and with a different gun, maybe from an open window in one of the nearby buildings. (If so, that means four shooters.)

Bill: does Mike make any mention of elevation/s at all as Chris Martenson did? That is, CM had suggested that from the suspected shooter 1 (and 2) vantage points the projectile/bullet would have to have travelled upwards? So wouldn't have been fired from an elevation above the furthest back row of the bleacher behind Trump.

I haven't had a chance to check Mike out, yet (and will)

[norman]

No that's not making sense, about Crooks starting the shooting.

The sound from the recorder position in line of sight ( and sound ) of Crooks on the roof was duller for the first 2 or 3 shots than the shots that started later.

The direct line to the recorder ( from Crooks on the roof to the recorder ) made his recorded shots sound contain more high frequencies ( brighter sound ). They came after the Pro shooter's shots that had less high frequencies in the sound because of being out of straight line transmission ( either sticking out of a window on a wall not facing the recorder or more likely back inside the building a little and firing through the window in front of it.

The brighter sounding shots came in after the duller sounding shots.

[mountain_jim]

Greg Reese reporting on Mike Adams research

https://gregreese.substack.com/p/evi...dRedirect=true

Evidence of Multiple Shooters at Trump Assassination Attempt
More questions and no official answers

GREG REESE
JUL 20, 2024

Historically, government assassinations are often carried out with a patsy to take the fall and a professional, or team of professionals, to execute the target. This ensures success and gives the appearance that there was no conspiracy. It all gets blamed on a mentally disturbed lone gunman.

But the alleged would-be Trump assassin was willing to go on a suicide mission. It was an easy shot and he had at least five years of marksmanship training. The independent work of Azget Industries shows how our young suicide assassin could have been the lone gunman. But she is restricted to using the limited information we have gotten.

According to the sound analysis of Mike Adams, there were at least three shooters.

“I think round one is probably Crooks. Round two is Crooks. Round three is Crooks. I think these three rounds are Crooks. It's my guess. Rounds four and five are from the same distance as Crooks but they are not Crooks. I think rounds four and five, right here, I think rounds four and five are from a rogue Secret Service team in the building that Crooks was on top of. So that's my guess. Round six is from medium range sniper, round seven is long range sniper.”
~ Mike Adams

Several witnesses that day claimed that there was a second shooter in the water tower. FOX News live-streamed the following testimony, but omitted it from final edits.

“that's where the other shooter was. There was one I heard in the water tower, there was one by the fence.”
~ witness

NBC live-streamed the following testimony of a woman who was in the front row

“He could see the sharpshooter behind Trump. He said the sharpshooter shot to the left. He killed the gentleman in the water tower here.”
~ witness

And omitted the following from the final edit.

“Now they feel that there was two shooters on both sides, so they got the one on the tower on this side, but the one on the right side, they never got. So that's why they wanted us to leave immediately because they thought there's still a shooter out there somewhere. I'm glad that guy's no longer with us any more in that tower. And I hope they get the other one, too.”
~ witness

Images of the water tower show a shadow at the very top. Frame by frame analysis shows what could be described as muzzle flash or the reflection of a scope lens.

Before any shots were fired, police were seen running towards the water tower.

Multiple shooters makes more sense. But then, how did they miss? Many are insisting that it was a staged event to inflame Trump’s popularity.

“We still don't know for sure whether Donald Trump was hit by a bullet, whether he was hit by glass fragments, whether he was hit by shrapnel. We don't have those details. We actually have no details from his physician, even though this man is still a secret service protected, you know, and, presidential candidate, We know almost nothing. Why? Why don't we know that much? We don't know why for nine full seconds, Donald Trump was allowed to stand back up during an active shooting, an active shooter situation. Even though they at that point had said the shooter, the shooter was down, how would have they known? How would they have known if there were more shooters or not? Nobody knew that. There could have been five shooters for all they knew. Yet they allowed him to stand up in the middle of that, you know, crisis and pose for a photo, and fist pump the air so he could get the iconic photo. And then they allowed him to stand up again outside of the SUV instead of just shoving him into the SUV. That seems really unusual. What is the actual injury to Donald Trump's ear that's under that bandage? Shouldn't we know that by now?”
~ Joy Reid

If it was fake, it was a flawless performance. And if it was authentic, it was not only sloppy, it was a millimeter away from Chaos. Either way, Trump is now seen by many religious people as being ordained by god, and others as being the Anti-Christ. Who believers have been expecting to survive an assassination attempt.


A ZH commenter

UPDATED FORENSIC AUDIO ANALYSIS OF TRUMP SHOOTING
(Updated July 19th, 2024, with most current analysis by Mike Adams)

(Seconds indicate INCOMING arrival time of rounds / sonic crack)
0 seconds: Round 1: 0.22s snap/boom gap - Crooks on roof? 400ft - 450ft away
0.8 seconds: Round 2: 0.22s snap/boom gap - Crooks on roof? 400ft - 450ft away
1.5 seconds: Round 3: 0.22s snap/boom gap - Crooks on roof? 400ft - 450ft away
(roughly 2 second pause, during which actual snipers are likely ordered to commence kill shots on Trump)
4.3 seconds: Round 4: 0.22s snap/boom gap - Assassination sniper inside building? 400ft - 450ft away
4.6 seconds: Round 5: 0.22s snap/boom gap - Assassination sniper inside building? 400ft - 450ft away
4.9 seconds: Round 6: 0.366s snap/boom gap - Medium-range sniper at unknown location (water tower?) 600ft - 700ft away
5.1 seconds: Round 7: 0.714s snap/boom gap - Long-range sniper at unknown location (farther than water tower) 1100ft - 1500ft away
ANALYSIS: Rounds 6 and 7 fired from bolt-action rifles. Single shots only. Likely higher caliber: 308 Win or 300 Win Mag

[SilentFeathers]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
I don't think this audio analysis by Mike Adams has been posted yet. It's a follow-up to Chris Martenson's already well-circulated video (which has now had over 460k views). Mike does a good job, explaining his calculations very clearly.

His logic is hard to refute, and I can see that this is pretty straightforward for anyone with experience of analyzing the audio of any kind of gunshot. And this must now be known, probably as early as Sunday or Monday, by any 'official' investigators.

https://brighteon.com/a2ec2cff-0d92-...9-e1fa9eb3fb09

Source: https://www.brighteon.com/embed/a2ec2cff-0d92-4870-9629-e1fa9eb3fb09

Here's a follow-up Tweet from Mike Adams, now having measured the water tower distance. He concludes that shot #6 could indeed have come from the water tower, but that shot #7 was from almost twice as far away.

The text:

I am measuring the water tower at approx. 760 feet from Trump's podium. This distance could be consistent with the audio forensics signature of round #6, which has a snap/boom delay of 0.366 seconds. But it also means that round #7 was fired from BEYOND the water tower distance.

~~~

https://x.com/HealthRanger/status/1814365747751333924

A reasonable hypothesis:

1. Crooks was compelled to start shooting as soon as he realized he'd been spotted face-to-face by the officer who looked over the roof at him before he dropped back down again.
2. The other two shooters (shots #6 and #7) then had to take their quick chance as well, when they saw the consternation and SS action on the stage.
3. It's possible (as Mike Adams notes) that shots #4 and #5 came from a similar distance as Crooks, but from a slightly different angle and with a different gun, maybe from an open window in one of the nearby buildings. (If so, that means four shooters.)

I would bet anything Crooks had more than one hole in him......

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
Greg Reese reporting on Mike Adams research

https://gregreese.substack.com/p/evi...dRedirect=true

Evidence of Multiple Shooters at Trump Assassination Attempt
More questions and no official answers

GREG REESE
JUL 20, 2024

Historically, government assassinations are often carried out with a patsy to take the fall and a professional, or team of professionals, to execute the target. This ensures success and gives the appearance that there was no conspiracy. It all gets blamed on a mentally disturbed lone gunman.

But the alleged would-be Trump assassin was willing to go on a suicide mission. It was an easy shot and he had at least five years of marksmanship training. The independent work of Azget Industries shows how our young suicide assassin could have been the lone gunman. But she is restricted to using the limited information we have gotten.

According to the sound analysis of Mike Adams, there were at least three shooters.

“I think round one is probably Crooks. Round two is Crooks. Round three is Crooks. I think these three rounds are Crooks. It's my guess. Rounds four and five are from the same distance as Crooks but they are not Crooks. I think rounds four and five, right here, I think rounds four and five are from a rogue Secret Service team in the building that Crooks was on top of. So that's my guess. Round six is from medium range sniper, round seven is long range sniper.”
~ Mike Adams

Several witnesses that day claimed that there was a second shooter in the water tower. FOX News live-streamed the following testimony, but omitted it from final edits.

“that's where the other shooter was. There was one I heard in the water tower, there was one by the fence.”
~ witness

NBC live-streamed the following testimony of a woman who was in the front row

“He could see the sharpshooter behind Trump. He said the sharpshooter shot to the left. He killed the gentleman in the water tower here.”
~ witness

And omitted the following from the final edit.

“Now they feel that there was two shooters on both sides, so they got the one on the tower on this side, but the one on the right side, they never got. So that's why they wanted us to leave immediately because they thought there's still a shooter out there somewhere. I'm glad that guy's no longer with us any more in that tower. And I hope they get the other one, too.”
~ witness

Images of the water tower show a shadow at the very top. Frame by frame analysis shows what could be described as muzzle flash or the reflection of a scope lens.

Before any shots were fired, police were seen running towards the water tower.

Multiple shooters makes more sense. But then, how did they miss? Many are insisting that it was a staged event to inflame Trump’s popularity.

“We still don't know for sure whether Donald Trump was hit by a bullet, whether he was hit by glass fragments, whether he was hit by shrapnel. We don't have those details. We actually have no details from his physician, even though this man is still a secret service protected, you know, and, presidential candidate, We know almost nothing. Why? Why don't we know that much? We don't know why for nine full seconds, Donald Trump was allowed to stand back up during an active shooting, an active shooter situation. Even though they at that point had said the shooter, the shooter was down, how would have they known? How would they have known if there were more shooters or not? Nobody knew that. There could have been five shooters for all they knew. Yet they allowed him to stand up in the middle of that, you know, crisis and pose for a photo, and fist pump the air so he could get the iconic photo. And then they allowed him to stand up again outside of the SUV instead of just shoving him into the SUV. That seems really unusual. What is the actual injury to Donald Trump's ear that's under that bandage? Shouldn't we know that by now?”
~ Joy Reid

If it was fake, it was a flawless performance. And if it was authentic, it was not only sloppy, it was a millimeter away from Chaos. Either way, Trump is now seen by many religious people as being ordained by god, and others as being the Anti-Christ. Who believers have been expecting to survive an assassination attempt.


A ZH commenter

UPDATED FORENSIC AUDIO ANALYSIS OF TRUMP SHOOTING
(Updated July 19th, 2024, with most current analysis by Mike Adams)

(Seconds indicate INCOMING arrival time of rounds / sonic crack)
0 seconds: Round 1: 0.22s snap/boom gap - Crooks on roof? 400ft - 450ft away
0.8 seconds: Round 2: 0.22s snap/boom gap - Crooks on roof? 400ft - 450ft away
1.5 seconds: Round 3: 0.22s snap/boom gap - Crooks on roof? 400ft - 450ft away
(roughly 2 second pause, during which actual snipers are likely ordered to commence kill shots on Trump)
4.3 seconds: Round 4: 0.22s snap/boom gap - Assassination sniper inside building? 400ft - 450ft away
4.6 seconds: Round 5: 0.22s snap/boom gap - Assassination sniper inside building? 400ft - 450ft away
4.9 seconds: Round 6: 0.366s snap/boom gap - Medium-range sniper at unknown location (water tower?) 600ft - 700ft away
5.1 seconds: Round 7: 0.714s snap/boom gap - Long-range sniper at unknown location (farther than water tower) 1100ft - 1500ft away
ANALYSIS: Rounds 6 and 7 fired from bolt-action rifles. Single shots only. Likely higher caliber: 308 Win or 300 Win Mag

Here's Greg Reese's video (with the same commentary):

https://banned.video/watch?id=669bb930259706ea0f94d004

[SilentFeathers]

UPDATED FORENSIC AUDIO ANALYSIS OF TRUMP SHOOTING
(Updated July 19th, 2024, with most current analysis by Mike Adams)

(Seconds indicate INCOMING arrival time of rounds / sonic crack)
0 seconds: Round 1: 0.22s snap/boom gap - Crooks on roof? 400ft - 450ft away
0.8 seconds: Round 2: 0.22s snap/boom gap - Crooks on roof? 400ft - 450ft away
1.5 seconds: Round 3: 0.22s snap/boom gap - Crooks on roof? 400ft - 450ft away
(roughly 2 second pause, during which actual snipers are likely ordered to commence kill shots on Trump)
4.3 seconds: Round 4: 0.22s snap/boom gap - Assassination sniper inside building? 400ft - 450ft away
4.6 seconds: Round 5: 0.22s snap/boom gap - Assassination sniper inside building? 400ft - 450ft away
4.9 seconds: Round 6: 0.366s snap/boom gap - Medium-range sniper at unknown location (water tower?) 600ft - 700ft away
5.1 seconds: Round 7: 0.714s snap/boom gap - Long-range sniper at unknown location (farther than water tower) 1100ft - 1500ft away
ANALYSIS: Rounds 6 and 7 fired from bolt-action rifles. Single shots only. Likely higher caliber: 308 Win or 300 Win Mag

I don't agree with this....

My theory or gut felt guess: If this was a multi-shooter event (looks like it was)

The kill shot(s), the first 3 shots, 99.9% sure would eliminate Trump came from the 3rd window from the right beneath Crooks.

When the shot burst happened after the first 3 shots, Trump was already on his way down grabbing his head, then was out of view by SS agents covering him. There's no way anyone could be absolutely certain he wasn't bleeding out.

Shots 4 and 5 actually came from Crooks himself.

"Mystery Shooters", shots 6 and 7, I would guess their bullets went directly in to Crooks as they were not about to let him escape alive.

Shot 8, sniper behind Trump, they probably ordered him to put a bullet in Crooks to make sure he was dead. (plus they needed at least one shot from that area)

Regardless if I'm right or wrong, by the way this all went down, Trump was supposed to be killed in my opinion. Simply put, he miraculously dodge a bullet (or 3).

[mountain_jim]

this guys videos from later on show the upper ladder to top of water tower from main ladder

https://x.com/mariagrasmick/status/1814693439662858534

7/20/24 BUTLER FARM SHOW GROUNDS!!!! CRAZY!!

— HorseDickTheatre (@HorseDckTheatre) July 20, 2024


https://x.com/SMattingly_1221/status...96244306161974

Sara Mattingly
@SMattingly_1221
·
1h
Replying to
@HorseDckTheatre
and
@I_Am_JohnCullen
Also notice the little cleared path that comes up along the tree line to the back of the water tower. Someone could have easily accessed the water tower without being spotted.