*** Trump Shot (but safe) *** Live Now on all News Channels

[meat suit]

Posted by Tintin (here)
New close ups of the "shooter" (Crooks) from the Dave Stewart film, provided by Dave via X. Pretty good quality too:


Link: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTtSaXEW...jpg&name=large

This one is a crazy close-up. Now we can see what looks like a tripod and rifle configuration a little more clearly:


Link: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTtSeGYW...jpg&name=large

Just looking at the vents on that building, one is just below Crooks to the right.
Could that be a sneaky place to put a rifle through?
The vents look like the flap types, with flaps opening upon extractor van being switched on in bathroom.

[SilentFeathers]

I think I fixed the link, I tried every way I could think of to post the image into this thread but it just won't work.
https://photos.fife.usercontent.goog...-gm?authuser=0

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
I think I fixed the link, I tried every way I could think of to post the image into this thread but it just won't work.
https://photos.fife.usercontent.goog...-gm?authuser=0

Still doesn't work.

Best option is save the image to your computer and upload it as an attachment. Further instructions here. If you want to experiment you can do it in the Sandbox thread.

[Tintin]

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
I think I fixed the link, I tried every way I could think of to post the image into this thread but it just won't work.
https://photos.fife.usercontent.goog...-gm?authuser=0

Thanks for your efforts but the issue is I think that you are using a local link on your computer that presumably links only to someone with user account login access to that fife page. You'd need to download the actual image/s and place them on a more public url. You could email the image/s file/s over to me and I could plop them into the library. Then they'd be simple to link to.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by lightpotential (here)
If Cullen, as of this date, has not revised his position in light of these things, then I think he is a poor researcher indeed.

Personally, I wouldn't credit him with name 'researcher.' I'd suggest he was more a pedlar of sensationalist bunk, who lacks any clear grasp of the multi-layered nature of complex events like this one. That, or he's just being deliberately obtuse.

We on this thread, without batting an eye, have easily debunked his claims.

Furthermore, anyone who dangles a carrot in your face then pulls it away the last moment before tossing it over a paywall...I say, run.

FAST.

[norman]

Typical Rand Paul. Sucking all the air he can out of the obvious and puffing it into a fudged normalcy cockup theory, like he's been doing for 4 years with the scamdemic.



https://t.me/dailyrealtimenews/29022






https://t.me/tiktoknews45/28068

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

New upload just now from Dave Stewart (I think his name is). Following the footage is an audio recording of a police interview that took place a few days after the shooting.

Dave's annoying. He laughs too much and in inappropriate places -- sounds like he's enjoying the limelight, but a number of interesting tidbits emerge:

• Post-shooting, overhears LE talking over a radio; blood has been discovered in a bathroom (which suggests not Crooks)
• A second suspect may be at large
• Surveillance images purported to show Dave interacting with Crooks prior to shooting (may not exist, could be mind games, police tactics)

Tweet for some reason won't embed. Link below >
https://x.com/realDJStew724/status/1818344705786097932

[mountain_jim]

(unless the FBI was referring to some other Social Media account, but it's clear from the Emergency Disclosure Request to Gab they considered this account to be his.)

https://x.com/MJTruthUltra/status/1818377296752861215

MJTruthUltra
@MJTruthUltra
🚨 The FBI Appears to have Committed Perjury and Lied about the Shooter’s Online Rhetoric

• The FBI claimed that the Thomas Matthew Crooks had an unspecified "social media account" in 2019/2020 (when he was 14/15 years old) that posted "anti-immigrant and Anti-Semitic" content

• Gab CEO received an Emergency Disclosure Request ("EDR") from the FBI regarding a Gab account "EpicMicrowave" which, the FBI believed belonged to Thomas Crooks.
— Elon helped share this news.

• The Gab account messages are pretty clear… Crooks was a pro-lockdown, pro-immigration, left-wing Joe Biden supporter.

And the FBI lied about it…

Trap SET. 🧀



/////////////////




Kyle Becker reposted
KanekoaTheGreat
@KanekoaTheGreat
🚨BREAKING: Gab founder @basedtorba

just released an FBI Emergency Disclosure Request (EDR) that names Thomas Matthew Crooks's Biden-supporting social media account after FBI Deputy Director Paul Abbate falsely testified under oath to Congress.

According to his Gab account, Crooks supported Biden, lockdowns, and Biden's border policies.

FBI Deputy Director Paul Abbate just told Congress that "an account believed to be associated with the shooter" had posted 700 comments in 2019 and 2020 with "anti-Semitic and anti-immigration" views.

"While the investigative team is still working to verify this account to determine if it did, in fact, belong to the shooter, we believe it important to share and note it today, particularly given the general absence of other information to date from social media that reflect on the shooter's potential motive and mindset."

However, the FBI's request to Gab specifically identified Thomas Matthew Crooks's account as "epicMicrowave," which had posted comments completely opposite to what the FBI just told Congress.

Moreover, Crooks donated $15 to a progressive PAC on January 20, 2021, and posted comments supporting Joe Biden's border policies on Gab just weeks later, in early February 2021.

Why is the FBI Deputy Director lying under oath about Thomas Matthew Crooks' views to Congress and the American people?

[norman]

If a stabilized version has already been posted, delete this one.

https://t.me/tiktoknews45/28048

[Tintin]

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
I think I fixed the link, I tried every way I could think of to post the image into this thread but it just won't work.
https://photos.fife.usercontent.goog...-gm?authuser=0

We got there SilentFeathers

Here's the image:

[Tintin]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)

Posted by lightpotential (here)
If Cullen, as of this date, has not revised his position in light of these things, then I think he is a poor researcher indeed.

Personally, I wouldn't credit him with name 'researcher.' I'd suggest he was more a pedlar of sensationalist bunk, who lacks any clear grasp of the multi-layered nature of complex events like this one. That, or he's just being deliberately obtuse.

We on this thread, without batting an eye, have easily debunked his claims.

Furthermore, anyone who dangles a carrot in your face then pulls it away the last moment before tossing it over a paywall...I say, run.

FAST.

100 percent

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by lightpotential (here)
It looks to me that the people that jolted in shock did so because the sound wave of the bullet had just reached them.

So ... why did only several people on the top row of those bleachers flinch in near unison, but not others in other rows?

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by Tintin (here)

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
I think I fixed the link, I tried every way I could think of to post the image into this thread but it just won't work.
https://photos.fife.usercontent.goog...-gm?authuser=0

We got there SilentFeathers

Here's the image:

Think this enhancement program may have taken a few liberties rendering the finer details. It turned the metal façade into wood for one thing. But I found a better source for that window, taken from a stabilised version of the video. Try analysing this one.

[Tintin]

Looks like Dave Stewart also caught that pesky UFO looking object I shared a while back on the thread. (No, it isn't an insect.)

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
I'd humbly suggest that Yearick is a distraction.

Yes - I agree that, to the best of my (very limited) knowledge, it matters not to our larger understanding of this event whether the corpse on the AGR roof spelled his last name "Crooks" or "Yearick". Yes - these are the sorts of rabbit holes that perpetrators of such dramatic (and frequently deadly) events like to send conspiracy analysts such as ourselves down.

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
Not an atom of evidence points to him being involved.

Earlier on, I did see an image of Yearick (from earlier in his adult life) with a mole consisting of a pair of brown spots on his neck, below and slightly forward of his right ear, that matched a mole visible on the neck of the corpse on the AGR roof.

However I can't find that image now, in the little bit of time I just spent looking for it.

... so far as I am aware now, this detail (the corpse's name) is not worth further consideration on my part.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by Tintin (here)
Looks like Dave Stewart also caught that pesky UFO looking object I shared a while back on the thread. (No, it isn't an insect.)

Think that's a 🐝.

Not stamping a definitive verdict on that, but, if a bee did whizz past twenty feet from the camera that's what I'd expect to see.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by mountain_jim (here)

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
From the latest Patreon post Patrons Only: Breaking the Case Wide Open, Again.. (minimum cost $5/month) of Jason Goodman and John Cullen:

...

Just quoting this to bring it to the current page and express my deep thanks for your detailed description of what was covered behind the paywall.

You're welcome.

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
What did Cullens conclude about the identity of the proposed shooter from inside the window - he said in the free portion he believes he knows more about that person based on (something?)

later seen in comments - is this who he thinks was the shooter?

I wasn't paying close attention to Cullen's explanation of whom he suspected was the shooter from inside the first story window.

What I recall now is that it was a man wearing a black shirt marked "Secret Service", who Cullen suspected was the actual source of the blood found in a bathroom sink in that AGR building, and who was amongst the first to be filmed inside that first floor, as other (mostly local, city, county and/or state) police in more "militarized" gear, such as seen on Swat teams, entered the first floor of that AGR building below the roof with the then dead apparent shooter, right after the shooting ended.

If I were sitting on a jury hearing this case, from what I recall now of what Cullen presented on his suspicions as to who really fired some or all of the shots from the same direction (but from a bit shorter distance) as the shooter on the roof, I wouldn't find sufficient reason or evidence to convict anyone of so much as a parking ticket. Hopefully, if I actually was on such a jury, I'd be paying closer attention, however.

I notice good reasons, in your post and other posts here, to dispute this explanation of who the "real shooter" from that direction was, and whether he was on the roof, or behind a window below, or both.

I have nothing to add to that analysis, either way.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
... so far as I am aware now, this detail (the corpse's name) is not worth further consideration on my part.

Personally I differ, in that his identity is of massive importance. We have this guy on the roof shooting a gun, and now we have his corpse. Who exactly he is, what he was doing, how he managed to get so far doing it, and ultimately on whose behalf (if not alone, which I doubt), is paramount to getting to the bottom of this infamous, and, in perhaps another timeline, catastrophic event.

I personally advance and with total confidence that the person on the roof is the same individual that featured in the Blackrock commercial, identified as Matthew Crooks.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
If there really was another shooter, somewhere, they did a fine job at evading detection.

Or "they" are doing a fine job of keeping our attention away from evidence of other shooters.

[Tintin]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)

Posted by Tintin (here)
Looks like Dave Stewart also caught that pesky UFO looking object I shared a while back on the thread. (No, it isn't an insect.)

Think that's a 🐝.

Not stamping a definitive verdict on that, but, if a bee did whizz past twenty feet from the camera that's what I'd expect to see.

Funny, but not quite right My bet is that it flies behind the tower. (Would need to test that from the video). Dave's pointing it out this time, so can do more from his raw file to confirm either way - it isn't an insect

Previous video post from me here

Personally, if it can be identified as a drone of some sort, fine by me. I'm not getting bogged down in whether it's other-worldly, terrestrial, or a frisbee. It won't necessarily help to iron out the finer points being investigated, but, it just could be the kind of woo that has been known to accompany these sorts of highly emotionally charged events, throughout history.

I'll wait and see if Dave comes up with anything from his raw film.