*** Trump Shot (but safe) *** Live Now on all News Channels

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
The other shot was silenced and subsonic and came a few video frames earlier, nearly missing one team of SS Snipers on a roof, then going along the back row, causing all the flinches and reactions.

The thing I can't get my head round with this theory is that none of these 'other shooters' hit anyone, or anything. In my book, if you're running an op of this magnitude -- a high-profile political assassination -- there is no room for error, no margin for failure. So what do you do? You bring in elite snipers, your very best men, and yet not one of them landed a single hit we can account for.

With the exception of the roof-shooter that is; his bullets we can account for, on mic, even on camera, and the victims in the bleachers who were hit.

I'm not saying there wasn't a second shooter, or even third shooter, but to be convinced I first need a solid lead on who they were (alphabet people?), who they were shooting at (Trump? - if so, they're terrible shots), the position(s) they were bedded in at (where they were shooting from) and evidence of the shots they fired (recovered bullets, brass on the ground). For me, faint audio signatures isn't compelling enough to convince me these shooters exist. It needs to be backed up by tangible evidence.

I'm also finding it tough to reconcile how, when all was said and done, they expected to escape unseen. 'Disappearing' from a stand of trees in rural Pennsylvania is a bloody far cry from Dallas, with its maze of streets crammed with thousands of hysterical people. For the life of me I cannot imagine what their exfil strategy was. How did they expect to avoid all those cellphones?

[[Unless you want to go crazy-town and say they were wearing CHAMELEO cloaking devices straight out of Area 51. That's not being facetious, it has occurred to me -- if I put my mind to it, I can out-conspiracy the best of them!]]

In all seriousness, I see too many variables in play here, none of which they have sufficient control over. Given the gargantuan stakes, I say multiple shooters wouldn't only be risky, but reckless.

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
Disagreeing on his first of many points, and then dismissing him entirely as talking out his arse, before even considering the bulk of the evidence he presented for that first point, apparently (from how it looked to me) because his hypothesis (a silent shot along the back row of that bleacher) violated the narrative you've already accepted, ... that's perhaps less helpful.

Perhaps you're right, I won't argue with that, I simply believe we need more data. A lot more data, before we even begin to construct a meaningful theory.

I had in fact typed up a new theory in response to SilentFeathers, but when I read it back it even I was sceptical. Ultimately, I had too many questions I couldn't answer.

A healthy dose of scepticism is no bad thing though, so I'm definitely not criticising you for that. But I do believe we must caution against rampant scepticism. Meaning, automatic distrust of 'official statements', like the identity of Crooks, the guy on the roof. Yes, take it all with a grain of salt, but don't rush straight to 'everything is a plot, a ploy, an intrigue, a lie'. Some things really are what they are at face value. Not always, but sometimes. It's important I think we leave room for that possibility, lest we overlook an important clue.

All in all I'm actually having fun here. I do so love picking apart a mystery. And I'm loving, right now, watching those 'in power' scramble to cover their asses. Whatever else can be said about what happened that day, someone, somewhere, ballsed up BIG-TIME. Whichever side of the aisle you're on with who did what, and why: 'the dirty bastards behind the scenes' are exposing themselves for the fools and liars they are, day after day after day. And you have to agree, that's a beautiful thing to watch!

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
A sloppy single shooter assassination attempt falls right in to this pattern IMO.

Yes, absolutely. I completely agree.

... however ... just because that could have been what happened ... doesn't mean that's what did happen.

Rather, what happened, so far as I can tell, is more along the line of repeating the pattern of the JFK/Dallas assassination, with the "minor" differences that

• enough bullets from honest Secret Service snipers hit their targets,
  
• the assassin snipers were shooting from a longer distance, into a stronger cross wind,
• with mostly big slow silent subsonic slugs that are more difficult to target accurately,
• so that all of the assassin's bullets missed,
• or what's worse for the dramatic effect, almost missed, just nicking Trump's ear,
  
• while more raw data quickly "escaped" the perpetrators "cone of silence",
  
• enough competent analysts who cut their teeth on such "conspiracies" as the JFK/RFK/MLK assassinations, the Boston bombing, 9/11 and Covid operations were on the case,
  
• with enough tools of communication with each other,
• a sufficiently wide variety of communication and analysis skills, and
• with enough computer analysis tools of the audio and image data ...

to crack this case within a couple of weeks.

The deep staters were counting on the wide spread and vigorous plague of Trump Derangement Syndrome that you correctly observe to make their "lone shooter" narrative sufficiently plausible, once again, sufficiently long enough with sufficiently many people, so that they could file this assassination away in the "Unsolved Mysteries" folder of our public conscious. That folder is already over stuffed ... let us not let this case get stuffed in there too.

Now the deep staters are in deep doo doo ... which makes them doubly dangerous.

(Good thing that commercial flights to Israel are being canceled.)

[ThePythonicCow]

P.S. -- My recollection is that CNN didn't usually broadcast Trump rallies live, but they did broadcast the Butler rally. Did we not also see a high resolution photo from one of the most distinguished photographers of our time, of Trump, right as the first bullet whizzed by ... my memory is unsure here. [P.P.S. -- The world class photographer was Doug Mills, of the New York Times, who got the shot of the bullet streaking just past Trump's head.]

These are marks of an operation that planned on using the public waves, now called the Internet or Web, that have dramatically increased both the speed and bandwidth of their reach, and the number and resolution of live audio-video recorders (aka mobile phones), to spread the news of Trump's assassination far and wide, with maximum emotional effect.

A lone wolf shooter would not have been in a position to assign CNN and renowned live action photographers to this particular event.

[Bill Ryan]

For those readers interested (as I am) to keep updated about who is saying exactly what about all this, here's Lt Col. Tony Shaffer (Army veteran and retired intel/covert ops specialist, with extensive security detail experience) talking to Judge Napolitano earlier today.

In my opinion Shaffer nails it, and kudos to him. He states strongly, crystal clearly, and on the record what many, self included, are certain was inside complicity.

And he goes into some details of how that complicity might work. The section takes up the first 15 minutes of the video.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=1AQkbmmLLkE

[SilentFeathers]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
I had in fact typed up a new theory in response to SilentFeathers, but when I read it back it even I was sceptical. Ultimately, I had too many questions I couldn't answer.

I totally understand about being skeptical, I'm constantly seeing things that make me change my mind on certain things and revised my theory for the millionth time!

Something is just off and not sitting right with me about there being multiple shooters there that day. If the mission and main objective that day was to kill Trump, why did he leave there alive? Once they got Trump stood back up there were multiple times a second or third shooter could of killed him before he got in to the beast.

Trump was completely stupid to expose his head like he did after they stood him back up, the Secret Service looked like fools allowing him to do so. It almost makes the "Trump Faked It" theory sound plausible. (which I'm not buying into either).

Another rabbit hole I'm forcing myself not to go down is that this whole thing had a completely different meaning and purpose, one that didn't make a difference if Trump died or lived. That the assassination attempt was the method used for some type of extreme loyalty test or to send a message perhaps. Far fetched I know, but something is way off about all of this. Sometimes things are not what they appear to be.

Here we are debating number of shooters, body doubles, magic bullets, good cops, bad cops, etc etc etc., when the whole time this event could be really more about something completely different that no one even considered or thought about yet.

We'll probably never know what actually happened, but hopefully the narrative will continue to fall apart and we will get a somewhat of a better understanding of it all. Personally I think it'll always mostly remain a mind game.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
The thing I can't get my head round with this theory is that none of these 'other shooters' hit anyone, or anything. In my book, if you're running an op of this magnitude -- a high-profile political assassination -- there is no room for error, no margin for failure. So what do you do? You bring in elite snipers, your very best men, and yet not one of them landed a single hit we can account for.

Yes. That's what kept me as well from figuring that this was a serious, deep state, operation to assassinate Trump ... and they missed. How is that possible?

Even though my replies to SilentFeathers were not posted until well after this post of yours, I had not noticed this post of yours until just now ... I had a meal with my son and took a nap, in the meanwhile.

Now I am hoping that the muses will visit me again, that I might soon provide a proper response to your comments, while it is still fresh in my mind why I shifted to my currently posted views.

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
I totally understand about being skeptical, I'm constantly seeing things that make me change my mind on certain things and revised my theory for the millionth time!

Something is just off and not sitting right with me about there being multiple shooters there that day. If the mission and main objective that day was to kill Trump, why did he leave there alive?

Yup - that's the question (or certainly at least one of the questions.)

[mountain_jim]

There were folks reporting on day 1 their mobiles lost any network connection inside the rally for a period of hours...

Maybe this was why their drone would not work either?

Updated: I would like to see the receipts for FirstNet being in charge of communications there, because if this is true, it seems potentially explosive for possibly incriminating Mayorkis and Garland in this (increasingly likely) inside job.

(or not - but you know they have assets on down in that organization)

Later update:

FirstNet: A network built just for you

FirstNet now covers more first responders than any other wireless network. And thanks to you, it’s become the network first responders across the nation depend on most to stay mission ready.
As your needs evolve, so will FirstNet. We’re in this for the long-haul.

///
https://firstnet.gov/about/board

The FirstNet Authority Board
The First Responder Network Authority FirstNet Board is a team of highly-skilled, highly motivated individuals with a cross-section of expertise who are committed to making the nationwide public safety broadband network a success. The FirstNet Board was established as part of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012. Representatives include the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Attorney General, and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget as permanent members.

 
https://x.com/TonySeruga/status/1819156016464069116

Tony Seruga
@TonySeruga
The assassination attempt at the Trump Rally in Butler, PA on July 13, 2024, FirstNet was responsible for the issues with radio communications and cell service outages that day.

Guess who is on the board?


///


Tony Seruga
@TonySeruga
I’ve been warning about this since 2021.

Pay close attention to FirstNet.

FirstNet will assure whatever the Shadow Government and Deep State determine to be misinformation, or disinformation is unable to propagate the Internet, blocking users via their ISP, even at their router (China) as necessary, via IP And even MAC addresses. Guess who is on their board?

Interesting enough, FirstNet was also involved in the suppression and deletion of the J6 ‘pipe bomber’ mobile device data.

[Bill Ryan]

Chris Martenson is live again in 30 minutes.

John Copenhaver is the person who captured the video of the man running across the rooftop in what surely must have been plain sight of the Secret Service.

Step-By-Step Analysis of the Copenhaver Film

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=oKLlac5vBgk

[SilentFeathers]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
Chris Martenson is live again in 30 minutes.

John Copenhaver is the person who captured the video of the man running across the rooftop in what surely must have been plain sight of the Secret Service.

Step-By-Step Analysis of the Copenhaver Film

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=oKLlac5vBgk

It's quite astonishing that John Copenhaver unknowingly filmed the scumbag on the roof just moments before being shot by him. What are the odds of that?!?!

[Gwin Ru]

...

... from my perspective, Ole Dammegard dissects the event in totally different directions in considering said event, not as an attempted assassination but as a "jumping the shark" type of promotional coup to boost his image as "The Chosen One" blessed by God itself... Ole also points at the different characteristic signatures of various agenda, all in one stone strike.

Posted by Gwin Ru (here)
...

... good Ole Dammegard... what a feast for mind sustenance:

Ole Dammegard has mind-blowing information on Trump assassination. 1:54:40

michaelj5326

Streamed on: Jul 30, 9:00 pm EDT

Ole Dammegard website https://lightonconspiracies.com

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v56r7ok

... in any case, I agree with Ole that this event is a very professionally orchestrated psyop.

[Inversion]

Posted by Gwin Ru (here)
...

... beside all the $$ deals and control take-overs, there's also the biblical mimicry angle:

Reader---

"In the Bible the concept of blood on the right ear (Leviticus 8:22-24 and 14:28) serves as a visible mark of consecration, signifying that the person is dedicated to God's service and has been set apart for a specific purpose. This act represents a physical and spiritual transformation, preparing the individual for their sacred role". ----Entering Donald J. Trump,....... "I am the Chosen One."

Leviticus 8:22-24:

And he brought the other ram, the ram of consecration: and Aaron and his sons laid their hands upon the head of the ram.And he slew it; and Moses took of the blood of it, and put it upon the tip of Aaron's right ear, and upon the thumb of his right hand, and upon the great toe of his right foot. And he brought Aaron's sons, and Moses put of the blood upon the tip of their right ear, and upon the thumbs of their right hands, and upon the great toes of their right feet: and Moses sprinkled the blood upon the altar round about.

https://library.timelesstruths.org/m...but_the_Blood/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Donald wanted his shoes back to protect his big toes after the blood ritual simulacre.... I guess the shoe is made to fit

Here's Johnathan Cahn talking about the Leviticus verses. Maybe the whole thing is gearing up for the construction of the third temple. Simon Parkes said the Israelis are in contact with a particular alien race which gives them some kind of clout.

“Let’s go back to the thought experiment about the bubbles. There is a presentation of a
god, which as I’ve said, is Anu. This is the god that Muslim, Jew and Christian alike revere
and worship. This is the god who desires to return and provide a clear supremacy over
humankind to direct humanity to a Human 3.0, one-world-transhumanist-existence that
would stretch into forever.

07/29/24 (31:17)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=5vKDJ072oVs

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
Now I am hoping that the muses will visit me again, that I might soon provide a proper response to your comments, while it is still fresh in my mind why I shifted to my currently posted views.

The key insights to how it is that the Deep State botched this assassination attempt are best understood by listening to Clay Martin, in his interview with John Cullen, that I linked above in Post #1117:

• Multiple Shooters? | John Cullen & Clay Martin (TPC #1,538)

Clay Martin is at the top of his game, as one of the west's finest, most experienced, military snipers.

He can see exactly how this major operation might have failed.

The snipers for the assassins were shooting big, slow, ballistically unstable ammo into a cross wind, from longer distances than we've seen in prior historical U.S. Presidential assassinations and attempts.

It was absolutely essential to the deep state operatives that this operation succeed, both in killing Trump and in not exposing themselves. They recognized the world would be watching, in real time video captured by thousands. Thus they adopted a plan that kept the real assassins out of sight and out of sound. That, along with the usual problem that the best laid plans of mice and military go out the window once the action starts, along with the deep state apparently not being able to get the best world class snipers, and Trump's odds of surviving just rose dramatically.

I rather know how masters of their game might think and talk when they are at the top of their game ... for a few years long ago in a smaller arena, of Silicon Valley multiprocessor Unix systems, I knew no equal. When I listen to Clay Martin, I recognize that strength in him and smile ... just as Clay recognizes the sound of 300 Blackout each time he hears it on the audio that John Cullen plays for Clay, and Clay smiles -- yup that's it.

In short, when one has leaders selected for their loyalty to an agenda and to higher authority (human not divine), running and sometimes overrunning the hardcore techs that are actually move the bits or bullets, then the best techs will end up working somewhere else, and the second best techs you do get will f* it up, when crunch time comes. The "Left" knows that crunch time is here.

John Cullen, the interviewer of Clay, is a bit more of a mixed bag. His promotional style annoys some (as John readily admits happens), and he has blind spots technically.

One blind spot that Cullen has that rather annoys me is estimating velocity, by looking at frame-to-frame changes in position, of moving items in a video. For example, Cullen has a new video out claiming to have found another bullet flying past Trump, before anyone knew the shooting had started. You can see that "bullet" in several consecutive frames, passing just in front of Trump's upper body. The "bullet" is moving at what looks like 4 inches, frame to frame, in what is most likely a 30 frame per second video. Since 4 inches is 1/3 of a foot, that works out to (1/3) (feet/frame) * 30 (frames/second) ==> 10 feet/second.

The slowest ammo I've heard discussed in these recent weeks flew at about 900 feet/second, which is 90 times faster than the "bullet" that Cullen sees in his latest video. That's a big miss. Neither Cullen nor anyone else in his inner circle has shown the slightest clue how far out of touch with reality Cullen is on that detail - estimating object velocity from its frame to frame motion in video.

Cullen does do a good job with angles and distances in three dimensions, and he will stick with a problem such as this like a persistent puppy pulling on a rope. I trust that once Cullen notices all the comments he's getting from people such as myself on this mistake, he'll correct himself and keep digging.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Gwin Ru (here)
... from my perspective, Ole Dammegard dissects the event in totally different directions in considering said event, not as an attempted assassination but as a "jumping the shark" type of promotional coup to boost his image as "The Chosen One" blessed by God itself... Ole also points at the different characteristic signatures of various agenda, all in one stone strike.

There is a variation of what Ole Dammegard is describing that I consider an intriguing possibility.

Perhaps the White Hats got wind of a plot to assassinate Trump, and let that plot run, with the minimum of tweaks needed to make it likely that the plot would fail and Trump survive. That, and sending in a double for Trump, would probably work.

For one thing, the covert war going on between two (or more) powerful factions, world-wide, but with a major front in Washington DC, is epic. Clearly there are a lot of lifetime politicians and officials in DC, as well as some major corporations and banks, who want Trump gone, and who are increasingly frustrated by Trump's resilience.

Clearly also, the White Hats (as I term Trump's side -- no bias here ) must have some serious intelligence operations going on, deep inside the Deep State (as I term the other side) ... there's no way this covert war would still be ongoing otherwise.

Perhaps all it would take, give or take a few details, would be a "private conversation" with the snipers chosen to shoot at Trump, persuading them to miss their shots. Kill the patsy (he's a dead man in any event) before he does much. Remind the snipers that successful US President assassins have a life expectancy measured in hours, and promise to protect them if they all miss.

Then let the Deep State run their operation, massively exposing a substantial swath of them.

In a word: a "sting" operation ... as I considered earlier, above, in this post five days ago:

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
So ... what the heck is going on? Was Trump shot in the ear or not?

Also, why did Trump make a big deal about the large amount of bleeding he had from his ear when he got shot, when the close up images we have show a rather modest flow?

===

I've been forming a theory over the last two weeks now, here in my Avalon comments, that the Black Hats ran an assassination operation on Trump at the Butler Pennsylvania rally, two weeks ago, but that the White Hats got wind of the operation and co-opted it, ensuring that Trump wasn't shot, but making it look like the assassination operation happened, and only failed due to a miracle or great luck (depending on whether you pray at an altar or a poker table).

However I realize now that Janine, a Tarot card reader (sorry Dumpster Diver), to whom I've been listening throughout this time (and before), has more clearly stated that same theory, starting no later than two days after the attempt. So the best I can claim for my own contribution to this analysis is that it only took me two weeks to understand what she's been saying.

Yesterday, in the following video FOLLOW THE BLOOD, at the 16:00 mark, Janine says:

... and I've been saying this from the beginning: I feel like this is a sting.

So they're trying to catch people in the net. By playing this thing out, they're catching way more people. Way more truth will come out.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
And he goes into some details of how that complicity might work. The section takes up the first 15 minutes of the video.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=1AQkbmmLLkE

I often appreciate Napolitano's content, but he's prone to that very worst of offences an interviewer can be accused of: interrupting the speaker.

He does this at 14.35, stopping Shaffer mid-flow in what was important exposition.

That Crooks may have fired the second burst of shots tallies with my own working theory, in that those shots were aimed not at Trump, but the sniper group. I wish Napolitano had given Shaffer more time to share his thoughts on this.

Napolitano may be a great judge, and a terrific pundit, but as an interviewer...

[Gwin Ru]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
[...]
There is a variation of what Ole Dammegard is describing that I consider an intriguing possibility.
[...]

Although I keep Janine and JC's takes in a corner of my mind, but, like Janine and JC, Ole mentions about "White Hats", something like: "I don't see any results coming from them."

[Hermoor]

Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/fihNcFLVUrjR/

[SilentFeathers]

Whistleblower: Key USSS Team Not at July 13 Trump Rally

A federal whistleblower has alleged that the Secret Service's Counter Surveillance Division (CSD), which is responsible for threat assessments of event sites before an event occurs, was not present in Butler, Pennsylvania, on the day former President Donald Trump dodged an assassination attempt.

Yeap, the FBI supplied the shooter, the Secret Service and DHS supplied the brainwashed Kill Trump mission ready Shadow Battalion of incompetent DEI hires and other Trump hating agents with TDS, and the local LE were extremely manipulated and didn't know what the hell was going on. (just a guess).

[mountain_jim]

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)

Whistleblower: Key USSS Team Not at July 13 Trump Rally

A federal whistleblower has alleged that the Secret Service's Counter Surveillance Division (CSD), which is responsible for threat assessments of event sites before an event occurs, was not present in Butler, Pennsylvania, on the day former President Donald Trump dodged an assassination attempt.

Yeap, the FBI supplied the shooter, the Secret Service and DHS supplied the brainwashed Kill Trump mission ready Shadow Battalion of incompetent DEI hires and other Trump hating agents with TDS, and the local LE were extremely manipulated and didn't know what the hell was going on. (just a guess).

and perhaps FirstNet rigged up a false mobile access point and/or jamming tech which shut down cellular and interagency communications for the key period

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/Matt_Bracken48/status/1819352002507198601

Matt Bracken
@Matt_Bracken48
Not legit.
It was a hit.

Susan Crabtree
@susancrabtree
🚨🚨WHISTLEBLOWERS UNLEASH ON SECRET SERVICE CHIEF: Rowe Cut Security Assets, Agency Plagued By Systemic Problems, Special Treatment, Nepotism and Retaliation

NEW: Details of a whistleblower's legal case against the agency, accusing Secret Service managers of special favors, lowering standards for a son of a senior official - including improperly forcing a polygraph retesting after the son failed.

👉👉Here's my latest story on the accusations piling up against the embattled acting director and the once-vaunted agency, which has been plagued by security failures, low morale, and a culture of corruption for more than a decade https://realclearpolitics.com/articl...s__151382.html

[Ernie Nemeth]

Re: the picture above.

This is what I have maintained from the beginning: that they or someone opened up a hole in the perimeter security to let the shooter into the kill zone.
It was premeditated. It was an assassination attempt. It should have been successful.
Trump had supernatural help and survived or he is the luckiest man in the world, maybe both.