Three World Wars on a letter

[doubleboy]

Hi, guys.
(Not english, sorry for my mistakes)

Sure you know about the letter Pike sent to Mazzini,

( https://www.threeworldwars.com/albert-pike2.htm ),

and global events are going to make true what he wrote about WWIII.
But there is a point I can't figure it out and maybe you have some good information you can share.

"... the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view ... "

That means a new religion. My question is what is going to be its doctrine, its content, its priests and so on. How is it going to manifest in front of the global public? Do you know some clue about this? Perhaps related to New Age, Trans-humanism, IA, United Nations, NWO...?

Tough topic,
thanks in advance.

[shaberon]

Well, that letter is a fictional part of the Taxil Hoax.

It's a joke intended to excite the gullible.

So of course it is "true in character", but not in fact.

Albert Pike was almost a "nobody", but Giuseppe Mazzini is verily the heart of international terrorism and regime change.

"Lucifer" was invented as "the devil" primarily by Paradise Lost, which is aimed at Oliver Cromwell. The "religion" would amount to Zionism. Whereas in the fourth century, there was a Bishop named Lucifer. Or it was understood as a name of the planet Venus. Nothing to worry about here.

If you want to ask about Lucifer Publishing or Lucis Trust, then yes, that reflects the hidden hand of international fascism. But otherwise, it is a sloppy pile of nonsense. In general, a "new religion" is long since rolled out, which consists of any "weak, watered down" form of Jesus, the idea being along the lines that once civilization is decimated, we will flock to the Pope as the true redeemer.

This is what created the UN and Council on Foreign Relations. Already cemented in place for a hundred years.

The counter-point is that the "Christianity" referred to is not Christianity, it's the Roman Church and the Protestant splinter factions. That is the original meaning of "Anti-Christ", it means any false representation of Christ, and westerners are largely ignorant of, if not averse to, the Christian religion of Jerusalem.

Lucis was somewhat partnered with the idea of "Restoration of the Mysteries", meaning some modern guy's impression of what might have been going on at Ephesus or Delphi in ancient times, but there again all you would get is his ideas about it. I'm not aware of this maintaining any traction through the years.

If a "new religion" consists of imitating fragments, and to piecemeal together things that don't fit, I suppose this has already been done. There is no kind of "unified Lucifer doctrine" to be rolled out, unless again we inappropriately slap a name on the Lucis goals or something like that.