John Coleman: The Committee of 300

[DNA]

Posted by shaberon (here)

Well I am going to partly retract what I said, because there are multiple "Johns" I get mixed up, Coleman, Phelps, Perkins. It may have been Perkins that heavily repeated LaRouche. Pretty sure it was him that turned Mr. Orsini into the Gray Pope.

https://rumble.com/v2cf37q-dr.-john-...ee-of-300.html

Bro....
Bro...
For real bro.
LaRouche was probably influenced by Coleman and not the other way around.
Coleman is the guy you want to be.
I'm not kidding.
Coleman is retired British intelligence.
He is a Proffesor of history.

He literally researched on location in those ancient European libraries with the locked section containing brass hinged leather volumes hundreds of years old.

Being a Oxford Proffessor gave him the prestige and credentials to get access to these places.
And not just England but Italy and all of Europe. He was an on location researcher.
That is practically unheard of now.

And he prognosticated everything that is happening now.
And the proof is in the Rumble video link I leftfrom 1992.
You really should watch it.

[shaberon]

Ok. It turns out to be true that I had mixed up Coleman with another "John". Going over his material, no, it is not something I have encountered.

He does not harp on "Illuminati" and makes low use of "bloodlines".

His thesis is that there is a chain of command, Committee of 300 --> Club of Rome --> Kissinger.

He rapidly criticizes "Open Conspiracy", but, I am not sure that is not what is going on here, in a limited hangout way.

Coleman:

On 30th April 1981, I wrote a monograph disclosing the existence of the Club of Rome
identifying it as a Committee of 300 subversive body. This was the first mention of both
of these organizations in the United States.

Let's forgive him for perhaps not being in the country at the time. He is late to the party started by Limits to Growth:


In 1972, Meadows was on the MIT team that produced the global computer model "World3" for the Club of Rome, providing the basis for The Limits to Growth. The book reported a study of long-term global trends in population, economics, and the environment. The book made headlines around the world and began a debate about the limits of Earth's capacity to support human economic expansion—a debate that continues to this day. Meadows was the book's lead author, and it had three coauthors: her husband Dennis Meadows, Jørgen Randers, and William W. Behrens III.


We might say, well, that is their internal report, sent to maybe a few business schools and a target audience, not that well publicized. But then there is the famous enough Gianni Agnelli, owner, Fiat, to New York Times 1972:

Club of Rome, a Worldwide Organization


refers to additional funding from Volkswagen.



The NYT was all over the eastern seaboard. Highly respected and avidly followed at that. So, "those who read" found out about this, and, if interested, you could track down the report. The hard copy is still available for checkout from three local universities.

What seems most obvious from "Committee" is that he seems to have spliced in "300", where others typically place "Illuminati", "The Vatican", or "Jews".

He spams it into every single paragraph and never says what it is. He continually refers to "membership" without being able to say what of. Club of Rome has members who can be determined. But this amorphousness is supposed to command and instruct them.

The weight of his writing is mostly in the British usurping of early America, which we can find in membership lists of the Pilgrims' Society. It sounds strongly to me that, he either does not know the name of it, or does, and is covering it.

His allegation is this belief:

Their final objective was the overthrow of the
U.S. Constitution and the merging of this country, chosen by God as HIS country...

He actually *does* name religious fundamentalists as a tentacle of this beast, but, he is not distinguishable from one.

He says:


Let us talk about actual case histories, the attempt to communize and deindustrialize
Italy. The Committee of 300 long ago decreed...


Where is this case history or what is the decree? All we get is:


This called for an attack upon Christianity...


is it the Fourth Crusade, or what?

As we go through, he does try to pin an "older" origin, but then somehow they are brand new because:

Two of the Committee's earliest targets were Italy and Pakistan. The late Aldo Moro [1978]...


When threatening Moro, Kissinger was obviously
not carrying out U.S. foreign policy, but rather acting according to instructions received
from the Club of Rome, the foreign-policy arm of the Committee of 3OO


In my 1982 expose of this heinous crime, I demonstrated that Aldo Moro, a loyal member
of the Christian Democrat Party, was murdered by assassins controlled by P2 Masonry
with the object of bringing Italy into line with Club of Rome orders to deindustrialize the
country and considerably reduce its population...

This is entirely incorrect:

The Club of Rome formulated all of
what NATO claimed as its policies

NATO's "collective security agreement" comes from the maneuver of Nazi Argentina into the UN, which is the only possible explanation for Alice Bailey's claim of it being guided by "a handful of adepts".


This also is entirely oblivious to Alice Bailey who uses both these:

The name, New World Order, is seen as something developed as a consequence of the
Gulf War in 1991, whereas the One World Government is recognized as being centuries
old...

I have no idea what he means by that, Synarchy is from the 1880s, and otherwise you just have the British Empire, which could claim it circled the globe. Otherwise the United Nations is the only possible vehicle for such a thing.

He thinks highly of the Fiat family:

Agnelli, a
member of an ancient Italian Black Nobility family of the same name, is one of the most
important members of the Committee of 300. He played a leading role in development
projects in the Soviet Union...

He strongly dislikes certain things:

Illuminism (Moriah
Conquering Wind), the Cult of Dionysius, the Cult of Isis, Catharism, Bogomilism? This
elite group that also calls itself the OLYMPIANS (they truly believe they are equal in
power and stature to the legendary gods of Olympus, who have, like Lucifer their god, set
themselves above our true God)

He avoids mentioning Alice Bailey by name:

A One World Government-New World Order with a unified church and monetary
system under their direction. Not many people are aware that the One World Government
began setting up its "church" in the 1920's/1930's, for they realized the need for a
religious belief inherent in mankind to have an outlet and, therefore, set up a "church"
body to channel that belief in the direction they desired.

He is off the track. An enormous amount of people are aware of Bailey one way or another. She totally is a kernel there.


We have volumes on this incident, which might help shed light on "who" was giving orders:

The Committee of 300 ordered the Club of Rome to use Polish nationalism as a tool to
destroy the Catholic Church and pave the way for Russian troops to reoccupy the
country. The "Solidarity" movement was a creation of the Committee of 300's Zbigniew
Brzezinski, who chose the name for the "trade union" and selected its office holders and
organizers. Solidarity is no "labor" movement, although Gdansk shipyard workers were
used to launch it, but rather, it was a high-profile POLITCAL organization, created to
bring forced changes in preparation for the advent of the One World Government...

Here is certainly where the right wing says, well, these communists and the traitors are the same:

We have been brainwashed into believing that
Communism is the greatest danger we Americans are facing. This is simply not so. The
greatest danger arises from the mass of traitors in our midst...

This would be a cue, if we unravel for ourselves what helped Coolidge attain office that had not been done before:

In every election since Calvin Coolidge ran for the White House, the
Committee of 300 has been able to plant its agents in key positions in government so that
it matters not who gets the White House post. For example, every one of the candidates
who ran for the Presidency, from the time of Franklin D. Roosevelt, were selected, some
like to call it "hand picked," by the Council on Foreign Relations acting on the
instructions of the RIIA...

He hates The Beatles and credits Tavistock with the very words being spoken:

Ed Sullivan who had been coached by the conspirators as to the role he was to play.
Nobody would have paid much attention to the motley crew from Liverpool and the 12-
atonal system of "music" that was to follow had it not been for an overabundance of press
exposure. The 12-atonal system consisted of heavy, repetitive sounds, taken from the
music of the cult of Dionysus and the Baal priesthood by Adorno and given a "modern"
flavor by this special friend of the Queen of England and hence the Committee of 300.

I am not sure he understands New York or that Astor was one of the last significant opponents to the Federal Reserve:

John Jacob Astor made a huge fortune out of the China opium trade and then he went
respectable by buying up large tracts of Manhattan real estate with his dirty money.
During his lifetime Astor played a big role in the Committee of 300s' deliberations...

There are older "hints":

...the Committee of 300 granted them a monopoly in the slave
trade in 1833.

Perkins the elder
was one of the first Americans to be elected to the Committee of 3OO

With that whole The Beatles and drugs thing, what has been omitted is that for example Bayer sold heroin over-the-counter since the 1880s, and cocaine was the main ingredient in Coca-cola or available as a headache powder. There wasn't exactly such a thing as "drugs" but anyone could see what was going on with alcohol. I suppose you could say The Beatles were important because of television, but for example rock and roll came out of Texas in the 1930s. Then because of oil and polyester, hemp was a threat, and so "drugs" became "bad". The Beatles are rolling around only about twenty years after some primarily American businessmen said drugs were bad.


Allegations along the same vein:

All the Morgans and Perkinses were Freemasons, which was another
tie that bound them together, for only Free-masons of highest rank have any hope of
being selected by the Committee of 300.


They are Gnostics, Cathars, members of the cult
of Dionysus, Osiris, or worse. To them, "ordinary" people are there to be used for their
purposes. Their high-priests, Bulwer-Lytton and Aldous Huxley, preached the gospel of
drugs as a beneficial substance.

The closest thing I can find to an explanation of what he means is something like this:

The Committee of 300 is for the most part under the control of the British
monarch, in this case, Elizabeth II.

This then, is the all powerful OLYMPIAN GROUP whose power
base is in London and the City of London's financial centers


But the best proof I can offer of the existence of the Committee of 300 is the Rank
Organization which, in conjunction with Eagle Star, IS THE BRITISH CROWN


Lord Peter Carrington, who pretends to be an
Anglican Christian but who is a member of the Order of Osiris and other demonic sects,
including Freemasonry, installed as a Knight of the Garter at St. George's Chapel,
Windsor Castle, by Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II of England, of the Black Nobility
Guelphs, also head of the Anglican Church, which she thoroughly despises."


The Knights of the Order of the
Garter are the INNERMOST circle of the most corrupt public servants who have utterly
betrayed the trust placed in them by their nation, their people.
The Knights of the Order of the Garter are the leaders of the Committee of 300, Queen
Elizabeth II's most trusted "privy council."


Palmerston, like
so many of his kind, was not only a Freemason, but a dedicated servant of Gnosticism....
Like the present 'royal family,' Palmerston made a pretense of being a Christian but was
in fact a servant of Satan.

I, at least, partially agree with something here. That is, a nemesis erupting from London. Here, we can easily reveal a "wasn't there before, has been ever since":



The Ghost of Oliver Cromwell and the Bank of England 1694.


Those are Olympians -- Immortals.


Again he still falls silent on Bailey or The Synarchy:

Above all, the battle is a spiritual one. Unfortunately, the Christian churches have become
little more than social clubs run by the infinitely evil World Council of Churches (WCC),
whose beginnings lie not in Moscow but in the City of London, as we see from the chart
at the end of the book which gives the structure of the One World Government Church.
This body was set up in the 1920's to serve as a vehicle for One World Government
policies, and stands as a monument to the long-range planning capabilities of the
Committee of 300.

Is this the set-up of evil, WCC?

In 1920, the former Ecumenical Patriarch of the Eastern Orthodox Church, Germanus V of Constantinople, wrote a letter "addressed 'To all the Churches of Christ, wherever they may be', urging closer co-operation among separated Christians, and suggesting a 'League of Churches', parallel to the newly founded League of Nations". Church leaders agreed in 1937 to establish a World Council of Churches, based on a merger of the Faith and Order Movement (under Charles Brent of the Episcopal Church of the United States) and Life and Work Movement (under Nathan Söderblom of the Lutheran Church of Sweden) organisations.

Its official establishment was deferred with the outbreak of World War II...

Fortunately, we can get one more rip on Britain:

From 1776 when Jeremy Bentham and William Petty, the Earl of Shelburne, fresh from
the triumph of the French Revolution which they planned and ran, were drafted by the
British Crown to bring their combined experience to bear against the colonists, to 1812
when the British sacked and burned Washington, destroying secret documents that would
have exposed the treason being worked against the young United States of America...

For me personally, I kind of agree with this guy but think he is going overboard with:


pro-unspecified Christianity (particularly God is the Constitution), anti-pagan anything

near panic about Tavistock and music


Those are in their turn just a different kind of social engineering. Or, it sounds like values he wants to promote, that we should feel expected to follow.


Cromwell was a Puritan, the Puritans are the Pilgrims, who settled around Boston, which he trounces heavily. His "300" kind of works, if we replace it with "Pilgrims" in the majority of cases. If we fill in the details with information from the public domain, then it would be largely correct.

There would remain a few glaring errors, such as when he talks about being the first to speak of Club of Rome, I don't know how to correct that.

[DNA]

https://rumble.com/v2buf8e-dr.-john-...book-luci.html

The Rumble audiobook of Coleman's book on Tavistock.

[shaberon]

Posted by DNA (here)
LaRouche was probably influenced by Coleman and not the other way around.
Coleman is the guy you want to be.
I'm not kidding.
Coleman is retired British intelligence.

Well, I scoped out his first publication.

Coleman says he wrote an expose' on Aldo Moro, although it isn't mentioned in over 100 references.


I'm going to copy a response to the weird post about Pepe Orsini in October, 2023:

Go back to what Perkins said and see if he did not basically reverse gears on what was in EIR December, 1978:


In a book tantalizingly
entitled "Who Killed Aldo Moro?", the ELP runs a 110-
page story of the conspiracy.

Heading the plot was Elizabeth II of England.

Pallavicini, and Colonna
families



As shown in this chart taken from Chi ha ucciso Aldo
Moro, the European Labor Party's explosive expose
on Italian drug-running and terrorism networks, the
Sovereign Military Order of Malta, under the British
Crown, sits directly on top of Italy's "left-versus-right" terrorist confrontation - "Strategia della
Tensione" - and ties into both the right and left of
the political life of the country. both the Socialist
International (left) and the Black International (right),
both Zionists (left) and the "Golpisti," or coupmakers (right)...


Orsini is in the chart, but, not fingered as a major player--that is, not even mentioned in a sentence. QE II is "over" Pallavinci, not the other way around. Naturally, LaRouche includes himself in the future hitlist of this gang (that makes two so far).

The information is attributed to an official European source.

Here's what they say in Italy:


Questa posizione era stata espressa per la prima volta nell'indagine Chi ha ucciso Aldo Moro? (1978), scritta dal giornalista statunitense Webster Tarpley e commissionata dal parlamentare della DC Giuseppe Zamberletti.

Caso Moro page uses the same reference

Italian question-and-answer about it


Webster Tarpley wrote it, LaRouche concealed that, and Perkins re-wrote it backwards.

Tarpley was perhaps a bit more real as his thesis did indeed lead to the shutdown of P2 Propaganda Due:


The study claimed that the assassination was a false flag operation orchestrated by the masonic lodge Propaganda Due with the cooperation of senior members of Italian government secret services but blamed on the Red Brigades.

He did that in 1978, the same year it happened. How?


studio commissionato dal deputato Zamberletti


Who?


A member of Christian Democracy (Italian: Democrazia Cristiana, or DC), he was elected for the first time to the Italian Chamber of Deputies in 1968. After his re-election in 1972, he became undersecretary for Interior Affairs in the Moro IV, Moro V and Andreotti III governments, with responsibility for public security, the Vigili del Fuoco (Firemen Corps) and Civil Protection.


P2 was gone by January, 1982:


These had to be isolated and cooperation with the PCI, the second biggest party in Italy and one of the largest in Europe, which was proposed in the Historic Compromise by Aldo Moro, needed to be disrupted.

Gelli's goal was to form a new political and economic elite to lead Italy away from the danger of Communist rule. More controversially, it sought to do this by means of an authoritarian form of democracy.


As to the Fascist Gelli:


In 1970, in the plans of the failed Golpe Borghese, Gelli was tasked with arresting the Italian President, Giuseppe Saragat. As Master of the Propaganda Due (P2) lodge, Gelli had ties with very high level personalities in Italy and abroad, in particular in Argentina, where he was a fugitive for many years.


The amount of Argentine membership matches Synarchy and the manipulation of "collective security agreements".

That is what happened in Italy 1978-82. A collaboration between Tarpley and Zambetti prompted investigation that shut down this operation. I don't know that it satisfactorily solved Aldo Moro or fixed Italian politics. But it did have a membership list of over 900.

I'm not able to find any references for Coleman's 1982 article or him being known for publishing prior to this 1991 book.

Anyone may look at the full EIR 1978 article and see practically the same information and that LaRouche already purged Tarpley out of it.

[shaberon]

One more coal in the sack.


First here is an abstract from Cambridge 2017:

This article re-examines a contested chapter in the international and environmental history of the 1970s. Even though largely neglected by historical research and in the public memory, the Club of Rome – widely remembered for its 1972 report The limits to growth – was not only born within the OECD, but was also in its early period strongly influenced by debates within this think tank of the industrialized countries. Using previously overlooked sources, this article analyses this highly unlikely OECD–Club of Rome nexus. It not only offers a privileged view into the social history of international policy-making and the related personal entanglements and ideological transfers at a key moment of post-war history. It also demonstrates that the social, intellectual, and economic turmoil of the late 1960s prompted a rethinking of the economic growth paradigm, even within those technocratic institutions that had aspired to guide the post-war industrial growth regime. The article argues that these links are not only vital for our understanding of the relationship between acquisitive growth capitalism and environmentalism, but also enable a more profound understanding of the role of transnational networks in global history and the appreciation of the place of the 1970s in world history.

The savants at Cambridge U have apparently been unaware of the controversy. Perhaps that means it was not published in universities. But Club of Rome was "famous" since '72 and--it is in a nexus??

Well, the fascist Gelli started P2 in 1966, and, that was not out of thin air, certainly a "nexus" was going on.

We have been reading that 300 "commands" the Club--is the 300 this nexus? What is it??

Now, normally, I would say that when on page two of the introduction, an author claims to be the *sole* entity in custody of the information, we should think something is seriously wrong here. That part seemed obvious--the 1972 report *is* famous.

Again, it turns out that if we go to EIR June, 1981, this is front-loaded with attitude:

In his speech before 120 diplomats and government officials in Washington,
D.C. this last week, EIR founder Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. identified the
major policymaking institutions of the advanced sector as the real problem
leading the world toward World War III. No one could exemplify this
judgement more clearly than Alexander King, cofounder of the Club of
Rome, as he described the origins and workings of that institution to EIR in
Paris last month.


...It is the policies formulated in the Club of Rome, on behalf of the "black noble"
families of Venice and Great Britain, which are then transmitted through
leading institutions such as NATO, the OECD, and governments of nations
like Canada.

Long interview with a founding member.

There is no mistaking it is a brain-child of OECD:


Organization for Economic Co-ordination and Development



which, by analogy, would become the "300". It can't command anything, and, overall a rift develops between more and less extreme views in this think tank.

In the "300" book, it is mentioned one time in passing, as if extraneous.

Some kind of disconnect.

What may seem a little odd is that me and Coleman are shooting at the same targets. He criticizes the Crown, British governments, and their tentacles inside other governments. My ancestors began fighting English governments in the 1200s and I feel like I still am.

With the Club of Rome, I fell for that bandwagon. You don't have to be terribly old to remember the Regan and Bush era, from which, we developed a national distaste for Big Oil. That really was perfect timing to come in with the environmentalism, i. e. Clinton and Gore, they campaigned on it. They were hailed well enough as the reform from whatever went wrong. Military industrial complex and all that. At first I didn't pay any attention since we were glad the tumbleweed had rolled out, but, a few years down the road, there was buyer's remorse.

I snapped out of it on my own.

We could easily call it Green Nazi now.

Instead of me going on about this, I will suggest another source which is this Avalon thread on Maurice Strong 2012.

Is this something slightly "other", yes, here is a note I found that illustrates the difference well:


Likely in part because of his strong disavowal of the John Birch Society, Buckley was able to join the Council on Foreign Relations in 1973, at that point chaired by none other than David Rockefeller himself.


That thread easily shows what was going on mentally and socially--and so what I have learned to do is combat a *mentality* in fine detail.

It seems to me if we take the EIR Aldo Moro '78 and Club of Rome '81, copy/paste the majority and change a few header details, it will look like everything else. It is as if there is one "John" and when the last name is "Perkins", it is the Illuminati, which comes from British Fascism. When it is "Coleman" it is "300", which at least does not resemble any kind of subliminal message I can think of. If we take it as the 1909 German quote, "Synarchy" would be what that guy was originally fishing for. It's not really the name of anything, but, a shared mentality.

The thing he said that I think is dangerous was by making the Constitution a revealed act of God. That *is* a John Birch fundamentalist principle. And that, of course, is the camp that would take shots at the CFR/Club of Rome people. Oh, and Alice Bailey's Christ is Birch's Anti-Christ. This kind of Constitution is about like saying the Holy Land belongs to someone.

Why America is this God thing according to a British author, I am not sure.

Now, if someone doesn't like your music, the drugs you are taking, or your lack of religion, to the greater extent, that is their problem, and they should not be able to legislate about this.

It is the same with the Greens, you shouldn't be able to sit here based on a few words and start imposing dictates across the world or sending in the military. So during the period of buyer's remorse about the Democrats, we found our forces doing something horrible to Yugoslavia. That was when I decided the federal beast was irredeemable. This is the more correct view than Mr. Gore is going to make everything run clean.


It is really just the subjects and information that is important, the EIR owner was certainly a d-bag such as in this anecdote of journalists' cattery:

Lyndon LaRouche used to have tables at every major airport with a picture of Jane Fonda, at a time when she was controversial. As soon a Fonda haters walked up to the table they were sold his magazines. He was convicted of using this method to steal peoples credit cards and fund his various efforts to run for President.

One of the more widely reprinted articles in Covert Action was one I authored about Robert Moss and Brian Crozier. Crozier later wrote that he took the private elevator of the CIA director every time he visited to get paid. For about 20 years the CIA funded Moss and Crozier to spread disinformation. They were the top of the worldwide pyramid of fake news.

LaRouche came out with a special issue devoted entirely to Moss and Crozier in which they ended up working for the KGB.

LaRouche had one of his goons call me off and on for 1 year to ask questions about 5 different articles in Covert Action. Martin A Lee, a person who at the time was unknown, then took this information, plagiarized content from my articles verbatim, and together with a confederate at Mother Jones was introduced as an expert on the CIA. Mother Jones admitted knowing about the relation to the LaRouche group, and even paid them for the research that went into the artcle. They admitted to the plagiarism. They still backed this Lee person’s next project Acid Dreams, which became both a book and a documentary. In this version, the CIA was like your cool uncle who really started the US campus counter-culture by spreading LSD. Forget MK-ULTRA.

Already in the mid-80s you start getting twists and spinoffs, and something to sell the public.


Just going to add one thing. In terms of "modernity" -- something that wasn't there before and now is -- then we can attribute a couple things to the Boer Wars. Propaganda:


Many historians believe the Boer War was "the last of the gentleman's wars" (Krebs 55), a war to preserve the empire, but also, as seen in the mass street celebration of the relief of Mafeking on May 18, 1900, a possible jingoistic aberration on the part of Britain's citizens (1).

Media


Widespread literacy was practically brand-new. So newspapers became more effective, and, there was an ability to print colored posters. Well, there was a need to persuade disinterested persons into fighting a Capitalists' war on the other side of the world. Obviously some psychological pressure happened.

The thing is, they sucked. The reaction was, in the words of that opium warrior, Wellcome:


Eugenics gained acceptance among the intellectual, literary and political elites after the Second Boer War of 1902, in which Britain suffered enormous losses due to the poor physical condition of its soldiers, who were predominantly from the lower classes.


Byline:


At the start of the 20th Century, British policy-makers were obsessed with the fighting stock of the country. The Boer Wars (during which British forces established some of the first concentration camps) revealed the poor health of working-class men in the UK – known as the ‘Condition of England’ problem. This led to a raft of social reforms to improve housing and healthcare to provide the nation with a healthy stock of soldiers for the battlefield.


"official report":


Fitzroy 1904


It easily spread to Harvard at the:


First International Eugenics Congress, which met in London in 1912...


easily around the Ivy League. Sweden implemented it heavily, and, it is, of course, the root doctrine of the Nazis.


In Britain:


This paper discusses the surprising resurgence in the fortunes of the British eugenics movement in the 1930s.



Master Race:

...contempt for ordinary people and outright racism were two of the defining creeds of British socialism.

Many progressives were drawn to the hope that science could build up the strong parts of the nation, and slowly eliminate the weak. Dozens of them signed up for the Eugenics Society, which in the 1930s rivalled the Fabians as the fashionable salon of London socialism.

In those times it was the Jews who were regarded as posing the chief threat of alien dilution of English blood. Bernard Shaw described the Jews as “the real enemy, the invader from the East, the ruffian, the oriental parasite”. JA Hobson, a radical journalist who made his name covering the Boer war for the Guardian, declared that the Transvaal had fallen prey to “Jew power”.

That's...essentially British, heartily lapped up by America.

So in the 1920s we start finding "organizations" and "foundations" and so forth, as the spawn of psycho-social engineering which was born basically fist-in-glove with electricity and mass printing.

[ExomatrixTV]