WADE FRAZIER : A Healed Planet

[Wade Frazier]

From Substack:

If I had not had many awakening experiences, such as our family’s changing its diet when I was 12, to my mystical awakening at 16, the traumas of my post-graduate years, and then my wild ride with Dennis Lee for four years, I would have never embarked on my years of study. Those events radicalized me, and I never saw the world the same way again. No topics were off-limits to me in my early days of study. I gradually became aware of the depth of the lies that I had been raised with. The news was all lies, the history that I was taught was a pack of lies, as mass-murdering thieves and genocidists were held up to me as heroes, saints, and fathers of my country. My original profession had a conflict of interest at its core that made it worthless. An industrial waste was rebranded as compulsory “medicine.” The sitting American president was murdered in broad daylight in front of hundreds of witnesses, and it was all covered up. I learned that free-energy and antigravity technologies are older than I am. A close relative was a contract CIA agent who worked for Henry Kissinger. His secret life ruined his life, and he drank himself to death, which is a typical fate at the CIA. Ralph McGehee barely survived his moment of awakening, after a career at the CIA, just as Dennis barely survived his moment of awakening, as his nationalist illusions were shattered.

What could surprise me after those revelations? Well, perhaps the most bizarre issues that I snooped into were the Moon landings and ET issues. Not really because of the subject matter so much, but because of the three-ring circuses around them. Because I got a tour of my father’s “office” – NASA’s Mission Control Room – I had an abiding interest in space exploration since age eight. I originally began looking into the Moon landings to see what might be covered up about them, not whether they really happened. But I gradually became aware of arguments that the Moon landings had been faked. In early 2001, I decided to get to the bottom of the issue, and just as I began, ex-astronaut Brian O’Leary was on national TV, wondering if NASA really landed men on the Moon. Brian inadvertently dragged me into the issue, I then spent the next several months doing a deep dive and became satisfied that the Moon landings happened as presented, other than one possible issue: the cover-up of ET encounters on the Moon. I read of such encounters early in my studies, but I did not know what to make of them.

After my co-discovery of evidence that the Moon landings happened as presented, Brian invited me to hang out with him, and we had an epic note-trading session. During that session, Brian told of a UFO-conference that he co-hosted, in which high-ranking military officials attended and they made him an “offer” to perform classified UFO studies. Brian immediately rejected the offer and nearly died immediately afterward of a “heart attack” that Brian eventually suspected was a murder attempt. His health never fully recovered and the incident shortened his life. The closest that Brian ever came to disclosing that event was in his last book. Not long afterward, Steven Greer wrote that the Apollo 11 astronauts indeed encountered ETs on the Moon. Greer wrote of unpleasant encounters with the same officials that made the “offer” to Brian, as they dangled two billion dollars to co-opt him. That was one billion more than the CIA offered to Dennis to fold our free-energy operation.

Even for me, these were bizarre realms to navigate. One of my detours during my Moon-landings studies was the footage that Bart Sibrel promoted as evidence that Apollo 11 never left low-Earth orbit. It was not evidence of that at all, which anybody can tell with a little study. Bart had me going for a few days, until I realized the error in his interpretation. A few years later, I took trips to James Gilliland’s ranch to watch UFOs fly over, and was never disappointed. The crafts seemed to have interacted with James’s mind and mine. As I went public with these issues and did interviews, I could come upon spectacular information, such as that an ET craft “parked” next to the International Space Station for two days, and it was naturally covered up. I have one degree of separation from one of the astronauts who was in the ISS when it happened, from a completely credible source.

Those are the kinds of situations that my studies could immerse me in, and thank god I no longer drink. So, my studies and experiences led me to these conclusions:

• NASA really landed men on the Moon with conventional rocket technology;
• At least the Apollo 11 astronauts seem to have encountered ETs on the Moon;
• The underground technology show that my friend received included free-energy and anti-gravity technology, and my guess is that at least half of what he was shown in his mind-blowing demonstration had an ET origin.

E. Howard Hunt told the original Watergate attorney that JFK was killed over the ET issue, and that made sense to me when I heard it in 2015. My guess is that it was related to JFK’s attempts to end the Cold War, and his planned joint mission to the Moon with the Soviet Union may have been the final trigger in his murder.

To this day, people approach me, including scientists, over the Moon landings issue. It has become a wearying topic for me. If people take a little time and exercise a scientist’s discernment, they will soon understand that all of the so-called evidence of faked Moon landings falls apart upon inspection. I never saw one piece of faked-Moon-landing evidence that survived much scrutiny. There are lies coming from all directions, but the Moon landings were not faked.

To the structural and conspiratorial aspects, the ET cover-up in the USA is mainly a national-security issue, at least officially. Stray documents have arisen here and there, such as a Canadian official who wrote that the ET cover-up was bigger than the secrecy around the Manhattan Project (Greer has written about that document). The recent “investigations” and disclosures by the Pentagon, which concluded that there is nothing to the ET issue, are Big Lies, on par with the cover-up of JFK’s murder. But, as with the organized suppression of free-energy and other exotic technologies, very few people who are part of the cover-up really understand what is happening. Most just do their jobs, are fed expedient lies to guide their efforts, and most do not really care what the truth is, as long as they are well compensated. That is a human universal.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Paul:

The accounting of scarcity ends in the Fifth Epoch. That means money, carbon credits, and all such measures, which are also manipulated for elite ends and have become means of control. That all ends in the light of abundance. Elites end with abundance, and they know it. That is why they play the games that they do around energy. Nothing else on Earth gets that kind of treatment, except arguably the ET issue, but that is mostly to keep their technologies out of the public’s mind and hands.

The only kind of accounting that I see happening in the Fifth Epoch is about meeting everybody’s needs. “What do you need? Here it comes.” Material scarcity becomes obsolete.

To another post of yours that I have been meaning to respond to, about aging gracefully into one’s 70s, I hope to. On that note, I just had the third-best hiking year of my life. The best was 1986, the year that I met Dennis. Oh, what this body could do at age 28. My second-best was in 2021. I not only regained a lot of my health that year, I did three of my favorite hikes in the same week, which I never did before. I have not been posting up hiking pics much this year (a few, but not many), but I’ll try to select a few that were representative of the hiking season. I didn’t go anyplace new this year, other than finding some hidden nooks on my favorite local mountain, but that is fine by me.

Well, I guess that I did go someplace new, now that I think of it. I made four trips to these falls this year, three times taking people who had never seen it. My niece just had to go scale the cliffs to get into the upper falls, so I went along and I had to do some rock-climbing. I don’t plan to do that again. Pic attached from that trip. I also took her to the easiest meadow from Seattle that day, attached. I go every year, usually multiple times, and have never seen anybody else in that meadow.

I had my fair share of meadows, in spring, summer, and autumn, and the last picture was taken a couple of weeks ago, just before the snow got too deep. I probably did not hike as much as usual. I’ll probably “only” get out 70-80 times this year (versus my more typical 100 times), mostly to my local mountain, but I got in at least one high-country hike each week from May through October. If I can keep that up for the next 20 years, I’ll take it! But it has all been gravy since 2013, as I got my fair share in for this lifetime and then some. Other than hiking and taking care of my wife, trying to nudge along the Fifth Epoch is about all that I have on my plate anymore, and that suits me fine.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

From Substack:

I sat down to write about the global elites and their so-called Black Hats and White Hats, and realized that it was Election Day in the USA. So I will write about the global elite and retail politics.

In the 1960s, Bucky Fuller said that politics had become obsolete as fundamental problem-solvers for humanity. All politics is about slicing up the pie of scarcity, and each faction tries to get its disproportionate share of it. As soon as Brian O’Leary resigned from the astronaut corps, he advised George McGovern for his 1968 run for the presidency. Brian led a war protest at the White House in 1970 and was invited in to air his grievances. He later became Mo Udall’s speechwriter during his run for the presidency in 1976, which wrecked Brian’s marriage. Brian advised several “progressive” presidential candidates. Brian had a lifelong “codependency” with Washington, D.C., and near his life’s end, he informed me that electoral politics was a dead-end. He would have known.

I was raised in a Democratic household, and my mother worked for the Lyndon Johnson campaign in 1964. When I came of age in 1976, I voted for Jimmy Carter. I have not voted for president since Nader in 2000, when it became very clear how rigged the process was. Ed Herman learned the same lesson that I did in that election. I had long since been radicalized when I voted for Nader, by my free-energy-revolutionary days in the 1980s. But I still played the retail political game, at least a little. I was in a march on the eve of the 1999 WTO meeting in Seattle, where I met the former governor of Washington State. After 9/11 and the USA’s imperial rampage in Afghanistan and Iraq, I was in several peace marches, but I turned down an invitation to the White House in 2006.

During my free-energy-revolutionary days, I began learning that the world did not work remotely how I was taught that it did. Gary Wean gave me the best advice that I could have gotten, as I tried to save my partner’s life: no official in the USA would help. That soon led to my springing my partner, Dennis Lee, from jail, in the biggest miracle that I ever witnessed. I experienced official corruption that beggared the imagination, as the officials, from the police to the prosecutors to the judges, were a bunch of criminals.

From the very beginning of our partnership, we began encountering shadowy interests, although I was too naive to understand what was happening at the time. We almost immediately received a $10 million offer to buy us out, which I later learned was the going rate to buy out efforts such as ours. Dennis also began to receive strange, late-night anonymous phone calls of encouragement. It took several years before I began to understand that those contacts came from the people who run the world, from the “Black Hat” and “White Hat” factions. A year after those initial contacts, a CIA man offered Dennis $1 billion to fold our operation, on behalf of “European interests.” I did not discover that until I read it in Dennis’s book in 1996, when I briefly rejoined him and we were targeted by an elaborate sting operation, as the global elite raised their game to new levels. But I did not realize what was happening until a decade later. I learned that the world-changing technologies that we pursued are very real and are older than I am, but the global elite control them and keep them from public awareness and use for reasons of power.

In 2004, I heard Steven Greer state that a faction of the global elite admitted in the early 1990s that they had paid out $100 billion to buy out efforts like ours (the amount may have doubled by now). It fit perfectly with my experiences, and a whole lot more began making sense. Gary also had inside information on the JFK assassination, three weeks after it happened. JFK was killed in a backfired CIA operation that was interposed by unknown interests. My primary suspects are the USA’s Eastern Oligarchy and Military Industrial Complex, but the crime will never be definitely solved, other than my certainty that Lee Harvey Oswald did not do it. I have studied the JFK-hit issue since 1989, when I read Gary’s account, and I never saw one piece of credible evidence contradict Gary’s story, and as more evidence has come to light, partly through declassified documents such as Operation Northwoods, it has only served to further validate Gary’s tale. In 2015, I was contacted by the original Watergate attorney, who reported that he was told by E. Howard Hunt, who ran the operation that got JFK killed, that JFK was killed over the ET issue. That made sense to me, and I suspect that it was related to JFK’s proposed joint mission to the Moon with the Soviet Union, as a big step toward ending the Cold War.

JFK was murdered in front of hundreds of witnesses, and the Warren Commission, led by Allen Dulles, who despised the man who fired him as head of the CIA, covered up the CIA’s involvement in JFK’s murder. The message was loud-and-clear to all future presidents: “You are expendable.” The American presidency has been largely ceremonial since then. Politicians do not make the important decisions on Earth. The world is really run by unaccountable global elites who hide in the shadows. The American president is far down the hierarchy of power on Earth. Do you think that the people who run the world would vest much power in the hands of the likes of Kamala Harris or Donald Trump? They are puppets.

I do my best to ignore retail politics, but it is in my face daily in this strange election year. So, by all means vote, my fellow Americans, and Sam Husseini is trying to make a dent with his VotePact, but I gave up long ago on the idea that retail politics is going to save the day. I have not given up, however, and my effort could seem as quixotic as Sam’s, but nobody has ever tried my approach before, and I had to make an attempt.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

From Substack:

In the wake of Donald Trump’s electoral victory, I want to reemphasize what I am doing. I am trying to end the world as we know it, and nobody will miss it. But this is also the hardest task on Earth, for numerous reasons. The biggest reason is that over 99% of humanity is either ignorant or in denial and fear of the free-energy issue. I have seen it all since 1986, when I got involved with free-energy field, although I did not know that there was a free-energy field at the time. Among the conspiracists that I had to ban at my Substack site, one recently called free energy a hoax and castigated me for even mentioning it. The irony of that position it that people around me have seen it with their own eyes. I am more used to people’s calling free energy “impossible” than a hoax, but there are many flavors of denial.

There are many barriers to comprehension of this situation, but they can all be organized under the rubric of scarcity. People are addicted to their scarcity-based frames of reference, which makes abundance simply unimaginable to them. What also does not help is that free energy has been subjected to history’s greatest cover-up. Even if people wanted to become aware of what is happening in the world, the odds are stacked against them.

Free-energy activists have worn a pathway to all perceived power centers, “progressives,” and the like over the past century. Not only did that never get anywhere, they were often walking into the lion’s den. My former partner, Dennis Lee was known by name by all White House administrations from Reagan’s onward. I turned down an invitation to the White House. Perhaps strangely, the Republican White Houses treated Dennis better than the Democratic ones did.

I am still besieged with QAnon-type emails about Trump, but I doubt that he is going to be Santa Claus coming down the chimney for humanity, bringing free energy and abundance to all. The free-energy field has been in a state of arrested development for longer than I have been alive.

I am doing something different, so different that almost nobody understands what I am doing, although it is not conceptually difficult. Very few can unhook their minds from scarcity.

As Brian O’Leary said in his last years, this is a lonely path. I know who I am looking for, and my work for that past 35 years has really been about reducing the intellectual lift of those that I seek. My Substack presence is my latest experiment.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

From Substack:

I read an article recently on cancer cause and treatment, along with the stir around RFK, Jr.’s possible role in the coming Trump administration, and the cancer racket is a classic instance of the structural/conspiratorial issues around a racket. Sam Husseini wrote an excellent article on how the Democrats handed the election to Trump, partly with their pandemic policies, but Sam wonders if Trump will be worse in the end. These are huge, wide-ranging subjects that I can only skim in a Substack post, but here goes.

Briefly, on current events, fluoride is an industrial waste that got a makeover into compulsory “medicine” by scientists and officials with surreal conflicts of interest. The early fluoride promoters, before World War II, all worked for leading fluoride polluters, especially aluminum refining. There were fluoride-pollution disasters in the early 20^th century, and in 1931, three independent studies identified the fluorine ion as the cause of tooth mottling, as the teeth disintegrate, and there was an effort to remove fluoride (the fluorine ion) from the water supply. But the world’s leading fluoride polluter at the time, ALCOA, was able to subvert the process by setting scientists and employees under its influence to turn reality upside-down and announce, with zero credible science to support it, that fluoride was good for teeth instead. I have not often seen reality turned completely upside-down like that. A recent example is how the media completely flipped perpetrators and victims in the multiple genocides in Rwanda and Congo, which Ed Herman wrote extensively about.

The flipping of fluoride from deadly industrial waste to a tooth’s best friend was well on its way by World War II, but it received a huge boost by the Manhattan Project, when fluorine was essential for separating out the uranium isotope that made nuclear weapons possible. A huge fluorine accident by the Manhattan Project was covered up, and a Manhattan Project scientist, Harold Hodge, became the face of fluoridation. Hodge was the USA’s counterpart to Mengele, as he experimented with plutonium on unwitting subjects. Hodge kept his Manhattan Project affiliations secret as he became the leading voice in fluoridation, and he picked the one part-per-million (PPM) level that has been added to the American water supply since before I was born. It is indisputable that 2 PPM fluoride causes dental fluorosis (which is also visible evidence of extensive fluoride poisoning). When not being a fluoride propagandist, Hodge recommended a 100-to-1 safety window for potentially hazardous food additives, but recommended a 2-to-1 window for fluoride, even though there is plenty of evidence of harm at concentrations far below 1 PPM. It is one of the greatest frauds in the history of public health.

I recently wrote about the recent courtroom victory on fluoridation, which I did not think that I would live to see. Now, RFK, Jr., is talking about removing fluoride from the water supply (only about a century overdue), which would be a miracle to me. We’ll see how that goes. I have already seen the media mount a propaganda campaign against that. I do not put much stock into what I call retail politics, but this is an amazing development.

Similarly, there has never been a credible study on the safety of vaccines administered to American children, as the infectious-disease racket has been dominant since before I was born. Infectious disease was conquered before I was born, and Anthony Fauci led what I have come to call Medical Racket, Version 2.0. There is no credible evidence that medical interventions had anything to do with conquering infectious disease. Infectious disease was conquered by improvements in sanitation, nutrition, and hygiene, which were side effects of industrialization and led to the biggest event in the human journey so far: the elimination of childhood death. Instead of the death of half of all children, in a trend that went back to gorillas, almost none do today in industrial nations.

It turns out that the fluoride issue is highly relevant to the cancer issue, and it took me many years to understand the mechanisms of it. The fluorine ion is especially disruptive to mitochondrial processes, and particularly making ATP, which is the coin of energy of all life on Earth. When my family changed its diet when I was 12, from processed food to whole food, which led to a health miracle for my father, the science around it did not go into metabolism and mitochondria. But in my studies over the past generation, metabolism, which is rooted in the mitochondria for complex life, took on great evolutionary significance. I then read what I long suspected, that the metabolic disease that processed food causes is at the root of all degenerative disease. Up to 98% of Americans have metabolic disease. That article that I began this post with is about the metabolic theory of cancer, which is more than a century old.

What I found especially interesting in that article was the DNA fetish among orthodox cancer researchers. Metabolism, not DNA, is the problem. It perfectly dovetailed with Nick Lane’s work on metabolism and evolution, as he argued that energy outranks reproduction in biology, but the DNA fetish among scientists has overemphasized DNA, which is more of a symptom than a cause in cancer. I heard a cancer-researcher pal discuss this 20 years ago, as he found that heredity had almost nothing to do with breast cancer.

When the metabolic nature of degenerative disease is understood, the sheer insanity of attacking cancer tumors becomes evident, but that is all that orthodox medicine knows how to do, under its warfare paradigm. Almost none of the many alternative cancer treatments that I am aware of, which have all been suppressed by the cancer racket, attacked the tumor. Instead, they worked to cure metabolic disease and rehabilitate the immune system, so that the immune system could deal with it.

The people at the tops of the infectious-disease and degenerative-disease rackets understand what I am writing about, but trillions of dollars are at stake, in one of the greatest rackets on Earth. But, as with similar situations, it is 1% conspiracy and 99% complicity, as the structural aspects outrank the conspiratorial ones.

That may be a bridge too far for Kennedy and Trump to cross right now, but I will watch with interest. I did not expect to live to see these issues become as prominent as this, and the COVID response is partly why, as the medical racket was in everybody’s face.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

From Substack:

What I call the retail elite are elites in the public eye, and that includes politicians, who are often rich or work the revolving door, from government to industry. That especially includes billionaire “philanthropists.” A great deal of the conspiracist material that I see focuses on them, from the Rockefellers to Bill Gates and Elon Musk, to various politicians, to the World Economic Forum and other elite enclaves.

Dennis Lee had encounters with the Rockefellers and Rothschilds, elite politicians such as Al Gore and George W. Bush, and plenty of billionaire “philanthropists.” A close relative was a contract CIA agent who worked on Henry Kissinger’s secret team, when Kissinger had no official role in the American government.

We also were contacted repeatedly by the people who really run the world. One pal was kidnapped by a “White Hat” faction and given an underground exotic technology show that included free-energy and antigravity technology.

Our encounters with the people who really run the world and retail elites were very different. The people who really run the world never identify themselves, as far as I have seen, and we dealt with intermediaries, such as high-ranking military officials and a CIA errand boy who delivered a billion-dollar bribe offer. About as close as I have seen to identifying them has been “European interests,” the Mormon Financial Empire, and factions of the Jesuit order. Make no mistake about it – if you hear from the global elite, your life is in peril. If they kill you, it will generally not look like premeditated murder. Many free-energy inventors have met untimely demises. It just comes with the territory. I am trying to do this without hearing from the global elite for a long time, if ever. The people that I recruit for my “choir,” if they heed my advice, will never be in peril. Their greatest peril will be if they try to proselytize to their social circles. That never works out well, and usually means wrecked relationships and even careers.

The sitting American president is a long way down the hierarchy of power on Earth. Nearly all conspiracists bark up the wrong trees, confusing the retail elite with the people who run the world. Al Gore and the billionaire class are all very familiar with free energy, but they will never discuss the issue publicly. One of RFK, Jr.’s coauthors was in Steven Greer’s latest movie, so Kennedy has heard of free energy, but nobody is talking. It is not that they are naïve about free energy, but something else is happening. They are generally also worldly enough to know that it is not just paranoid conspiracist gossip. If people ever got an honest answer out of them, we would know more, but the retail elite won’t touch free energy with a ten-foot pole. My guess is that they have been warned off the subject, perhaps subtly or maybe in no uncertain terms if necessary. I don’t know, other than that they are all aware of it.

Near his life’s end, Brian O’Leary was beside himself at how free energy was completely off the table of possibilities at all “progressive” gatherings that at least feigned interest in solving the world’s problems. It is really surreal, when you know that such technologies exist. I can kind of understand Gore’s objection that it is “too dangerous” (but it could be made safe, and likely already has been), but to refuse to even discuss or publicly acknowledge it is bizarre, and my guess is that the true global elite have something to do with it.

So, the retail elite are down the hierarchy of power on Earth a ways. Some may be closer to the top than others, but none of them really call the shots on Earth. Some may be playing a role on behalf of the global elite.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

From Substack:

As I have written plenty, if not for my radicalizing days with Dennis Lee, as we pursued free energy, I would likely not have much worth saying. My days of study have been illuminating, but my lifetime’s learning curve was largely complete by age 30, culminating in my day the witness stand. Everything since then has been the small stuff.

As I hit the books, what immediately struck me were the egocentric conceits that I was raised with, as part of my in-group indoctrination and conditioning. It was lies, from beginning to end. For a time, I had indignation at the depth of the lies that I was taught, which is common with the newly awakened. But over the long years of study, as I realized that what I had been subjected to was normal, I became more sympathetic to people’s inability to even imagine anything beyond their immediate self-interest, much less a coming Epoch. It has always been this way. I eventually realized that Americans are not so exceptional, nor are humans.

Deception has been employed for at least hundreds of millions of years, in the dance of predators and prey. Ambush predation relies on deception, as the prey does not realize that its end is near. Crocodilians have relied on ambushes for hundreds of millions of years, generally at the edge of bodies of water. Camouflage is a standard tactic for both predators and prey. Chimps ambush their neighbors as they wipe out adjacent societies, and they engage in deceptive rear-guard tactics, just like in human warfare. Today, feminists see today’s trans craze as a rear-guard action on women, as a patriarchal attempt to eliminate the idea of women altogether, and I think that they are right.

The human line comprises the first primates to sleep on the ground, which made people vulnerable to the dawn raid. Catching their neighbors sleeping, so that they could be easily slaughtered, was a specialty of hunter-gatherer societies.

Elites are as old as civilization, and while the earliest ones established their positions violently, they soon relied on various deceptions, such as claiming divine status or sanction, abetted by a corrupt priesthood. While I have studied a great deal of world history, I know my nation the best, and the deceptions employed by Anglo-American elites were rampant from the beginning. The Spanish specialized in surprise attacks on their hosts during their conquest of what became Latin America, and the English were no better. In 1623, in a celebrated feat, the English poisoned the wine at a peace conference, which killed hundreds of Indians.

George Washington, the “father of our country,” was the chief architect of history’s greatest swindle, as he proposed to steal Indian land with fraudulent treaties, and Wikipedia will likely never even mention it. That genocidal duplicity set the standard for American foreign policy to this day.

In 1845, the USA continued its theft of half of Mexico, after stealing Texas the decade before. I heard the tales of glory as a Texas schoolboy, as Sam Houston’s forces slaughtered a thousand sleeping Mexican soldiers in minutes in a dawn raid. There is a Stalin-style monument to commemorate the feat, which I visited as a child. The 1845 offensive began by marching an army into Mexico to “start something,” and that was an easy war of theft from Mexico. It foreshadowed Hitler’s gambit to justify invading Poland. Anglo-American actions in North America inspired Hitler’s plans for Eastern Europe.

But those were murders of out-groups. What about sacrificing Americans for American foreign-policy goals? The week before the Pearl Harbor attack, the headline in Hilo’s newspaper stated that a Japanese attack was likely on the very weekend that the Japanese attacked. How on Earth could the Japanese attack have been a surprise to Roosevelt? Japan was goaded into the attack, which followed a playbook that was written by a White House military advisor the year before. Were those American sailors sacrificed at Pearl Harbor (which the USA stole less than 50 years earlier), to goad the American people into supporting the war?

Zbigniew Brzezinski bragged that the USA baited the Soviet Union into invading Afghanistan, to give the Soviets their “Vietnam.” Osama bin Laden had been an American foreign-policy asset for a generation when the 9/11 terror attacks happened, which was an excuse for an imperial rampage. I heard from a credible source that the plan for 9/11 was seen on Dick Cheney’s desk.

The USA’s “negotiations” in Yugoslavia a couple of years earlier were openly fraudulent, just as the USA’s were in the first Gulf War, but the American media just couldn’t seem to see it. The WMD rationale for invading Iraq was fraudulent from the beginning, only fooling those who wanted to be fooled.

People don’t need to be conspiracists to see the obvious, but the media and historians go into overdrive to deny, explain away, or minimize those situations. These kinds of stratagems are nothing new. As Noam Chomsky has often stated, Americans are not so exceptional.

JFK was killed in a backfired CIA operation, murdered in front of hundreds of witnesses, and it was all covered up. Jonestown was likely a CIA operation, as MKUltra got offshored after it was exposed (not much different from GITMO and outsourcing torture during the “war on terror”).

The ET issue is a three-ring circus of wild speculation and delusions. Ed Mitchell said that creating that environment was intentional, to purposefully muddy the waters, and wild-eyed conspiracists have unwittingly assisted the cover-up.

Conspiracists can have a field day with American events, for good reason. But that is not enough for many of them, as they argue that the Moon landings were faked, that JFK was not really shot, that the Boston Marathon bombings were not real, nor the Sandy Hook shootings, and they never provide a shred of credible evidence for their contentions. Nearly every time that a big American mass shooting happens, conspiracists call it a “false flag” within hours.

Because conspiracies by their very nature do not leave paper trails, scholars such as Chomsky do not have internal documents to study. Noam erred badly in writing a book in which he argued that the CIA would not have had any motivation to murder JFK. This is part of the problem for conspiratorial topics. On the right, conspiracies explain everything, as people deny their responsibility and complicity in the events, and on the left, they deny almost any conspiracy. I doubt that Americans are uniquely crazed on these subjects.

I lived through the biggest cover-up in history, and conspiracists deny that it even exists. Brian O’Leary wisely noted how we all contribute to this issue.

We’ll see if Trump changes anything, but the war in Ukraine was manufactured by the American government, as the neocons have goaded Russia toward nuclear war. JFK’s greatest accomplishment was avoiding a nuclear war. If Trump can defuse the situation in Ukraine and the Middle East (and deescalate the situation with China), those will be his greatest accomplishments. After avoiding nuclear war, the rest is trivial.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

From Substack:

As I sit at my keyboard, trying to live a normal life, I receive constant reminders of the extraordinary events that I lived through, as well as what those in my circles experienced. Much of it is simply unbelievable to most people. Some of what I lived through was so bizarre that even I sometimes wonder if it really happened. I am not sure how I would rank the strange events in my life, but having a voice in my head, twice when I asked for it (1, 2 – and the only two times that I ever asked for it), lead me on my odyssey is the strangest part for me. I have never heard of another story like that, especially when my partner was offered a billion dollars by the CIA to fold our operation two years later, before they lowered the boom on us. When I pass over, that voice and I are going to have a long conversation, and I might finally be let in on the joke.

Hearing about my friend’s underground technology show was another startling event, as was hearing about my close relative’s secret life working for Henry Kissinger as a CIA contract agent. Reading Gary Wean’s account of his involvement in the aftermath of the JFK hit was another extraordinary moment. But I was in the middle of a nightmare at the time, so Gary’s revelation was put on my back burner for years, before I began looking into the JFK hit, armed with Gary’s testimony, which I have no doubt was genuine.

When Brian O’Leary and I had our epic note-trading session, he described his encounters with high-ranking military officials who attended his UFO conference and tried to coopt the event, and he nearly died immediately after rejecting their “offer” to perform classified UFO investigation. By that time, not much could surprise me any longer. The closest that Brian came to publicly disclosing that life-shortening event was in his last book. Steven Greer wrote about those same officials in his dead-man’s trigger document.

I was not planning to write this post today, but I recently heard from Greer’s organization and found myself watching some of his Disclosure Project witness testimony. When I got Brian’s NASA bio published, his Martian credentials were challenged by a leading space debunker, whose challenge was idiotic. Just a little while ago, I stumbled into that same space debunker’s efforts on the Disclosure Project. He is still at it, in his old age. He has been known to try to intimidate his debunking targets by boasting of his CIA and national-security (AKA “spook”) connections. If I outlive him, I’ll reveal his identity.

I have been on the receiving end of debunking efforts and I had my own “skeptical” stalker for many years. His debunking efforts were a series of lies and misrepresentations. I exposed his lies, and then he made up new ones.

That space debunker is almost certainly rendering his debunking services on behalf of clandestine interests, and I am about half-convinced that my stalker was. This is a “fascinating” area of study, as it is hard to tell the paid debunkers from the amateurs. Most of the amateur debunkers are likely not consciously lying. Their minds are so twisted by their ideological fervor that they simply cannot see what is obvious to anybody who is not grinding an ax. The structural and conspiratorial aspects of the debunker’s craft came together in my experiences.

Brian had a “skeptical” stalker in his last years, who tried to undermine Brian’s speaking engagements around the world. That was some expensive heckling, and likely paid for by clandestine interests. A corporate hit man did the same thing when Dennis spoke at a conference after getting out of jail. People like them have infiltrated all “alternative” organizations that pose a threat to the world’s power structure.

How many are in on it and how many are just stumbling along, half-consciously practicing their debunker’s craft? I think that it is once again close to the 1% conspiracy and 99% complicity ratio that I have repeatedly cited.

Ed Herman wrote about the irrationality of establishment pundits, that they were incapable of rational thought when encountering information that contradicted their beliefs. Ed was describing the same dynamic that motivates those delusional debunkers, but some know exactly what they are doing.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

From Substack:

I have summarized Brian O’Leary’s Suppression Syndrome before:

• The scientists themselves – when new discoveries or inventions threaten their paradigms;
• Industrial suppression – as industries protect their turf from disruptive innovation;
• Governmental secrecy – spooks and black-budget operations orchestrated the UFO/ET, free-energy, and other cover-ups, which made the Iran-Contra Scandal seem like a kindergarten exercise;
• The aliens – who seem to want the secrecy, so that they can operate freely with abductions and human experiments;
• The media – which abrogated its duty to report the truth;
• Ourselves – which Brian called the biggest factor, as humanity seemingly does not want free energy and abundance, but wants to perpetuate this nightmare of scarcity and fear, and humanity does it largely unconsciously.

Brian wrote that the syndrome applied to free energy, parapsychology, and medicine. The energy and medical rackets are the two global rackets that I know best, but the sociology of all of them is similar. Everybody drinks the Kool-Aid, and dissent often means the end of one’s career.

I want to provide some examples of what Brian wrote about. As far as the scientists themselves, when Brian played the Paul Revere of Free Energy, he rode. He had access to the tops of the world’s scientific, academic, and “progressive” organizations. When we had our epic note-trading session, five years after he began his ride, I was interested in how it went. He had access that I never will. He then gave me a brief litany of the crazed reactions of denial and fear that he received, and ended with the question of whether we are a sentient species. I sadly understood. On the parapsychology front, Brian wrote of his Nobel-laureate colleagues at Princeton who sipped their sherry and ridiculed reports of the paranormal. Brian smugly sipped his sherry with them, as they all played priestly Authorities of Reality, until Brian had a remote viewing experience in 1979 in a human-potential class. Brian could no longer sip the sherry and soon left academia. On the medical front, Brian had his skin cancer cured with an alternative treatment, and had an instant psychic healing of his knee. The FDA kidnapped his skin-cancer healer from Ecuador and put him into an American prison, as an example of the long arm of the American medical racket. I don’t know what Brian’s encounters were with closed-minded MDs and medical scientists, but I have seen and heard of plenty of it. It was never more apparent than with the COVID pandemic, as MDs watched their vaccines and treatments kill people, but even then, few realized what was happening or really cared all that much. So, a great burden of responsibility falls at the feet of scientists. Brian once informed me that today’s scientists were more closed-minded than those who ignored and ridiculed the Wright brothers for five years after they first flew.

Even though the scientists themselves might largely be oblivious to the organized suppression that they nominally benefit from, as the rackets roll along, not everybody is so ignorant, and at the tops of the rackets are people who know exactly what they are doing. But even then, most who do the suppressing in industry and government are not very aware of the consequences of their actions. Many earnestly believe that they are keeping their societies safe from quacks, cranks, and criminals, no matter how much blood of the innocents gets on their hands. Others don’t care how much innocent blood is shed, as long as they are paid well, and the psychopaths among them get psychic income from shedding the blood of the innocent. Most people probably need to see it to believe it. I had to.

Government secrecy is a big part of the free-energy and ET cover-ups. Today I was watching Greer’s witnesses from the top-secret world, which inspired my previous post. They discussed compartmentalization, but they still saw things that they were not supposed to, partly because their colleagues could not stay silent, as they studied photos of UFOs and artificial structures on the far side of the Moon. I have relatives in the classified world, and we have discussed who makes it in that milieu and who doesn’t. Those who last keep their heads down, do as they are told, and ask no questions. Those who question or push the envelope of the secrecy procedures do not last long. JFK was murdered by his own government, probably over the ET issue, and it was all covered up, as one example of many of how the government covers things up.

The ET issue is an odd one, and I have heard various reasons. On the positive side, there apparently really is something like Star Trek’s Prime Directive of non-interference with primitive cultures such as ours, which prevents the enlightened ones from directly intervening. They seem to have interacted with my mind during one encounter. On the negative side, as Brian noted, the not-so-nice ones get free reign, because of the secrecy, for their dark games. Both could be true; they are not mutually exclusive, and I have seen the same rationale for interventions from the higher planes of existence. The enlightened ones know that we are here to learn our lessons, while the dark pathers do not want to contest for dominance with evil-minded beings in physical reality. So both poles of spiritual evolution largely leave us alone.

I don’t need to discuss the media much, do I? I got both barrels of the media’s lies during my days with Dennis Lee and also saw it with the medical racket before I ever heard of Ed Herman. On these subjects, the media is an enabler of the rackets, and they can make it up as they go (1).

Brian’s last category was ourselves, as we seem to want scarcity and fear over abundance and love. Brian said that humanity does this largely unconsciously. Brian called this the most important factor, and I agree. It is also the factor that can be the hardest to understand. I can get into mystical reasons for this, such as most souls on Earth have chosen to sleepwalk through their lifetimes. But I can also discuss mundane reasons for this, as people are addicted to the ideological frameworks that feed them and ensure their in-group status, which are all based on scarcity. So abundance is outside of their universe of the possible, and they react in denial and fear when even hearing about free energy and abundance. I had to witness those reactions many times before I began to understand it. Not all is lost, but only a tiny fraction of humanity is fit for the task of bringing free energy and abundance to humanity, and I know who I am looking for. That tiny fraction will be enough, if they can be trained and combine their efforts, which is what my work is all about.

Brian left out the global elite, but maybe he thought of them as industrial kingpins, which they are. Brian’s summary was the first short summary that I ever saw of this issue, was one reason why I became his biggest fan, and it has aged quite well since 1996. Oh, how I miss Brian.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

From Substack:

As a child, I eagerly read Ripley’s Believe It or Not books and Frank Edwards’s Strange books. But I also read the tabloids that my mother brought home, the Guinness Book of World Records, the family encyclopedia, all of the paleontology books in my elementary school’s library, and so on. I was an inveterate bookworm from the time that I could walk. I was raised to be a scientist, however, and by my summer in Europe right after I turned 16, and my first energy dreams were around the same time, I began to take a no-nonsense approach to fringe stuff (although I knew that the diet of Americans is what killed most of them and still does), until I had my dramatic mystical awakening at the end of that year. I did not know it at the time, but I was ruined as a mainstream scientist before I began. Brian O’Leary had his career ruined five years later while performing the same exercise that gave me my mystical awakening.

I became quite the spiritual student after that experience, and in my early college years, I studied math and science by day and spirituality by night, including what is today called channeled literature. But while I still have those Edwards and Ripley books, I did not read them much after my early teenage years. But I still sometimes bought esoteric books on Atlantis and such. A channel once told me that I helped melt down Atlantis and that my soul had been in penance ever since, and it does, in a strange way, seem to help explain my preposterous life.

When I met Brian in 1991 I had no idea who he was, and did not have contact again with him until early 1996, when he published Miracle in the Void and I became his biggest fan. Our collaborations began then. Back in the 1980s, my father told me about Carl Sagan and the “skeptics,” and how they were obtuse warriors for materialism, trapped in their paradigm, unable to see beyond it, and would defend it to their deaths. In the early 1990s, I began to study organized skepticism and bought a stack of Skeptical Inquirers, and was quickly appalled. Ridicule regularly poured from its pages. I bought books by Sagan and James Randi, and reading them was a dismaying experience. They were poor representatives for the scientific method, but while Randi was a magician, not a scientist, I suppose that it is understandable. Sagan’s work was shockingly bad. In those years of study in the first half of the 1990s, I did not know that Carl was Brian’s colleague. Even more ironic is that Carl and Brian came to represent the two poles of science. They were on opposite ends of the Face on Mars issue. Sagan likely won, but he did not play fair. Steven Greer’s sources said that the Face was artificial, which makes me wonder about Greer’s sources.

A year before Brian’s Miracle in the Void was published, Charles Ginenthal published a book on Sagan’s debunking of Immanuel Velikovsky‘s work. I interacted with several of the key players in the Velikovsky controversy over the next several years and got into the catastrophic milieu. In the end, Velikovsky’s work did not hold up with me, but Sagan’s shabby debunking work made Velikovsky’s work more prominent than it should have been. Velikovsky’s ideas that Venus is only a few thousand years old and that Venus and Mars had recent near-misses with Earth, which supported the literal truth of the tall tales in the Old Testament, is way out there. Velikovsky’s thesis was a wide-ranging interdisciplinary work, and the world needs more interdisciplinary works, but Velikovsky’s work is a weak example of interdisciplinary rigor. Starting with Bible stories and then hunting for wild scientific theories to support them is not the way to go about it. I also encountered similar literalist exercises such as Zecharia Sitchin’s on Sumer and the Anunnaki.

In those years, lasting to about 2000, when I began working on my writings in earnest, those fringe academic reconstructions were a study of mine, and practically none of it held up. But that is the rightful fate of most such efforts. Einstein took Velikovsky’s work somewhat seriously, largely because he was a fellow Jew at Princeton. Einstein even endorsed Charles Hapgood’s work on pole shifts. But to be fair to Einstein, plate tectonic theory had yet to be developed when Einstein died. If Einstein had lived for another decade, he would have repented his endorsement of pole-shift theory.

Another body of work was Graham Hancock’s on ancient civilizations that may have been technologically advanced. A central contention of one of his books was that Antarctica was ice-free in historical times, and he was far from alone with that argument, with works such as Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings in circulation. When I finished my website largely as it stands today in 2002, I resumed my science studies in earnest. The idea that Antarctica was ice-free in historical times, even only a few centuries ago, is about as ludicrous an idea as I have encountered on the fringes, and Hancock cited scientific evidence to bolster his contentions, but Hancock had no idea what he was doing, to put it kindly. If nothing else, there is no record of the sea level’s falling 200 feet in the past thousand years, which would have happened if Antarctica was ice-free several centuries ago.

The Antarctic ice sheets began growing over 30 million years ago, after Antarctica was largely ice-free for 200 million years, as Earth cooled down to our ice age. There is not a scientist alive with all of his marbles who will argue against that. The evidence is simply overwhelming, from numerous sources, including sediment studies and the dropstones from icebergs. Hancock cherry-picked evidence that he did not understand to make his arguments. The Antarctic ice was just one area of many that I encountered as I resumed my science studies, and when I eventually compared the scientific findings against Hancock’s evidence and interpretation, his work lost all credibility with me, but I continue to see him cited as some kind of authority. I was reading a book just this past week that quoted him several times, and it was not a fringe-science book

No professional astronomer gives any credence to Velikovsky’s planetary-billiards scenarios, for good reason. Such Biblical reconstructions are not the least bit credible. While I became familiar with catastrophic theory, and some of it is valid (such as the bolide that wiped out the dinosaurs), the idea of global catastrophes in the Holocene (the past 12,000 years) has no credible evidence to support it that I have seen. Because Velikovsky’s hypothesis is so wide-ranging, nobody can become an expert in all of the subjects that Velikovsky’s work touches on, but there was one aspect of his work that I studied a fair amount: the megafauna extinctions.

A book that I am currently reading has a chapter on the megafauna extinctions, which is titled: “Humanity in the dock.” I have used the same phrase before, to highlight the motivation of scientists who argue that climate change drove the megafauna to extinction. That is an invalid idea, and one example of many that I could provide was the extinction of the elephant family in the Americas. The elephant family evolved in Africa, and about 20 million years ago, Africa began colliding with Eurasia and the elephant family and apes migrated to Eurasia and thrived. By 16.5 million years ago, the elephant family made it to North America. The elephant family made a home in virtually every biome that it could get to. It was smart, huge, with prehensile trunks, and adults effectively had no predators. That family was the most successful mammal ever, before the rise of humans. Cats evolved sabre teeth to puncture the hides of baby members of the elephant family, but they didn’t stand a chance with adults. As the grasslands grew with global cooling, mammoths evolved to graze the grasses, but the elephant family is notoriously opportunistic in its feeding practices.

When South America began connecting with North America about three million years ago, the elephant family soon migrated to South America and flourished. About 20,000 years ago, at the height of the recent glacial interval, there were at least five elephant-family species that lived in the Americas (1, 2, 3, 4, 5), and they were doing just fine. Then the ice sheets began melting right on schedule, and it was good times again in the interglacial interval. Well, good times unless you were a megafauna in the Americas. By 10,000 years ago, the elephant-family in the Americas, which had prospered for over 16 million years, was 100% extinct. And to this day, some scientists argue, with a straight face, that climate change drove the elephant family in the Americas to extinction. There is nothing particularly noteworthy about the climate changes of the past 100,000 years, as the glacial cycle had been operating like clockwork for the past million years.

Those scientists give science a bad name as they defend humanity. The arrival of the greatest predator in Earth’s history – humanity – drove those elephant-family members to extinction, just like Homo erectus did to elephant-family members in Africa and Eurasia over a million years previously. It didn’t matter what the climate did; the easy meat was doomed. Perhaps the first casualties of the rise of humans were giant tortoises, which had a global distribution until the rise of rock-wielding apes around three million years ago. By the time that behaviorally modern humans invaded the Americas, nothing on Earth could stand in their way and they made short work of the elephant family in the Americas. There is no other contender for that feat.

I bring this up because Velikovsky proposed that those celestial events drove woolly mammoths and other megafauna to extinction, but that is even more fanciful than the climate-change explanation. I have a recent book by a scientist who dabbled outside of his field of expertise and tried to put a new spin on hypotheses such as Velikovsky’s, and his agent of destruction was a comet, which wiped out the elephant family in the Americas but miraculously spared Africa. Velikovsky’s work has no validity that I can see, and neither do recent works that try to resurrect a celestial explanation for the megafauna extinctions in the Americas, as the ancestors of today’s Native Americans are in the dock.

Velikovsky was just one of a long line of amateurs who proposed such ideas, including the notion that there is an inhabited planet with an orbit of more than 3,000 years (where the Anunnaki live), that do not have a shred of credible evidence to support them. Velikovsky’s and Sitchin’s hypotheses are literalist interpretations of mythological tales. It is as if people interpreted Grimm’s Fairy Tales as the history of Europe.

The pyramids of Giza are another focus of conspiracists and those amateur anthropologists (and even psychics such as Edgar Cayce), who argue that the pyramids were built with exotic (Atlantean, ET, etc.) technology. Those speculations spawned an entire cottage industry that argues that most or all of the megalithic architecture on Earth had an origin in exotic technology. What all such speculations ignore is that ancient peoples were very good at working in stone (many were in their Stone Age, after all). I consider that entire cottage industry to be populated by scientifically illiterate enthusiasts, conspiracists of various stripes, New Age conmen, and the like.

I think that if there really were technologically advanced civilizations in Earth’s past, we would have found some artifactual evidence, but I have never heard of any credible accounts of it, much less the physical evidence. The conspiracist explanation that the world’s governments are hiding all of the archeological evidence is hard to credit. Digging in the ground is not rocket science, and I have seen many instances of evidence that supports arguments against such civilizations, especially if it had a global reach (hard to imagine that one wouldn’t), such as how New Zealand’s bird-dominated ecosystem was apparently untouched for millions of years until the Maori invaded less than a millennium ago. Humans wiped it out nearly completely in less than a century. Instead of the 500-pound moa, all that is left are kiwis that weight less than 10 pounds. If tiny boneless organisms have been preserved in the Burgess Shale for over 500 million years, I doubt that it is too much to ask for one piece of credible artifact from an ancient, technologically advanced civilization.

I do not have a problem with the idea of technologically advanced civilizations in the not-so-distant past, but I have never seen the least bit of credible evidence for the idea. Every time that I looked, the so-called evidence was thin, with highly fanciful interpretations. Science is not supposed to work that way. When I have gone back to Edwards’s books and others like them, what seemed strange when I was 12 is no longer so strange, such as the Nazca lines. They can be seen from neighboring vistas. The idea that they were made for/by ETs is a huge stretch.

For those who want to look to mythical civilizations for evidence of advanced technology that we could use, I have news for them: world-changing technologies are on the planet today and are older than I am. That is something worth pursuing, not digging for ancient artifacts that may well not exist.

I don’t have a problem with the idea of ET visitations to Earth, not with what I have seen, or their manipulating the human genome, or even their seeding the first life on Earth. But I want to see the evidence and what the most-tested interpretations are. Over and over again, I have seen evidence and enigmas that scientists investigated, where it was DNA, various artifacts, geological oddities, and the like. The fringe/conspiracist crowd could be counted on to leap to the most fantastic interpretations of the evidence, as their imaginations and speculation ran wild, in something akin to spinning folk tales. This is a universal human failing (or is it a feature?), and partly why science is so hard. Brian was a prominent advocate of the scientific investigation of paranormal phenomena. That is the approach to use, in my opinion.

If I had not already heard about my friend’s underground technology show, I am not sure how much credence I would have given to Greer’s Disclosure Project witnesses, but when they began describing what my friend saw, Greer’s work began to gain credibility with me. However his mini-alien obsession, of what is almost certainly a human fetus, has been embarrassing to witness, as were his naïve forays into the free-energy field. Maybe he has learned his lessons well enough by now to make some headway.

This post is a little sample to support my statement that the fringes are filled with chaff. There is some wheat there, for those who do their homework, but it is comparatively rare. The conspiracist approach is rarely helpful, in my experience.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

From Substack:

The foregoing 19 posts on conspiratorial topics were intended to present what I have encountered and learned on my journey, as I engaged many controversial topics, or they engaged me. My first taste was during my early days with Dennis Lee. I joined his company as it was being killed off by the power structure in Washington State, and the global elite seem to have been involved. Then the company was stolen, and my boss helped engineer the theft. A corporate hit man joined the company, which resulted in one employee’s death. There were definitely conspiratorial events in those Seattle days, engaged in by many different people and interests. It was bewildering at times. Little did I know that my adventures were just beginning.

The Massachusetts authorities were sicced on Dennis by the Washington authorities, as Dennis tried to rebuild his effort in Boston. When I became Dennis’s partner a few months later, we were soon contacted by the people who run the world, but they never identified themselves and they worked through intermediaries. I knew that we were on a global stage, even in my naïveté in those days, and I suspected that we would be wiped out, but suspecting that something might happen and actually living through it are two different issues. Another corporate hit man was sicced on our Ventura company, and he led a successful effort to steal the company when Dennis was in jail with his million-dollar bail, mere weeks after declining the CIA’s billion-dollar offer to fold the operation. I will never know how deeply it all went, but I eventually learned that we gave the people who run the world some interesting days at the office.

But as influential as the global elite were in those events, my greatest learning experience was watching what everybody around me did, watching corrupt officials in action and a lying media, and how a few of us stood up to the hurricane and somehow survived it, albeit with ruined and shortened lives. The non-conspiratorial aspects amazed me the most, some of which I refused to believe at first, although my moment of truth was on the witness stand, when a psychopath unmasked himself to me. Then it all came together in an epiphany, and my life was never the same after that.

What surprised me the most was not the conspiratorial behaviors, but how easily people fell for them, like puppets that were being danced on strings, as the psychopaths played them like violins, appealing to the greed and fear of their targets. I learned my journey’s primary lesson in those days.

In my days of study after those events, I kept seeing the same dynamics repeatedly. While there was often conspiratorial behavior, it was the non-conspiratorial behavior that was often the most consequential. The conspirators rarely had to be very active in their interventions. They would intervene here and there, through intermediaries, and then let nature take its course, as their targets often self-destructed, usually not even aware of how they had been targeted. If they began to suspect that they were targeted, they often lashed out at their allies in their paranoia, so that they became unwitting accomplices in their self-destruction.

I can’t overemphasize the lessons that I learned in those days, and everything in my life since then has been the small stuff. As I performed my studies, I found that the 1% conspiracy and 99% complicity ratio that I saw during my adventures applied to most similar situations. I will now summarize those 19 prior posts, with a few comments, so that this post can serve as an index of sorts, ordered differently from how they were originally presented.

I have to start with my own adventures in the energy business and what I eventually learned from people close to me. Free-energy and antigravity technologies are older than I am, but have been suppressed in history’s greatest cover-up, which is conjoined with the ET cover-up. JFK seems to have been murdered over it, and I found that people had severe barriers to comprehension, mainly because of their indoctrination and conditioning. We had numerous encounters with the global elite, and they were rarely pleasant. The global elite play the game at higher levels than what I call the retail elite – elites in the public eye. The global elite hide in the shadows, as it is good for business to be invisible to the public. Oh, the stories that I have heard from those close to me.

Brian O’Leary described the situation as the Suppression Syndrome, and everybody on Earth bears some responsibility for this situation. Our societal systems are corrupt, from top to bottom, and the media plays an enabling role for all of the global rackets. Brian’s summary aligns with my view that there are structural and conspiratorial, or unconscious and conscious, aspects of these situations and the structural aspects are by far the most important. Because of the machinations of the global elite, Earth’s politicians are all puppets that never make the important decisions on Earth, the existential ones that will see humanity either get over the hump or destroy ourselves in this century. The muddle-through middle ground has been quickly disappearing in my life. It is likely either the Fifth Epoch or bust for humanity.

The Suppression Syndrome is far from confined to free energy and other exotic tech. I have seen it in the automobile and oil industries, as they have colluded for over a century, and Brian saw it in medicine and parapsychology.

After my life-ruining days as a free-energy revolutionary, I hit the books and snooped into many topics. I noticed several dynamics that swirled around those subjects.
The important issues on Earth are three-ring circuses of elite interventions, worthless politicians, crazed conspiracists, criminally insane debunkers (although some are professionals), and a sleeping and sometimes gawking public. American imperial behavior is the most evil force on Earth today, and key events in the American Empire’s ascent are often shrouded in conspiratorial behaviors. Among the most recent were the 9/11 terror attacks, in which far more happened than meets the eye. I don’t know exactly what the overlap is in global and American elites, but it is likely substantial, as the USA is history’s richest and most powerful nation.

I looked into the Moon landings, ETs, claims of technologically advanced ancient civilizations, and how assassinations became a spook sport in the USA for a generation, among many other topics. What a strange journey that all was.

The energy and medical rackets are the two that I know best. The USA’s political right has been seduced by the energy racket while the left has been seduced by the medical racket, and it was never more apparent than during the COVID-19 pandemic, as all that most “progressives” could do was parrot Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, and friends.

There is something to many conspiratorial topics. It is not all just the fevered imaginings of conspiracists, but they are usually so unbalanced and victim-oriented that they rarely do anything important or achieve productive understandings (but the same thing often happens with structuralists, too). I have had to ban a few conspiracists at Substack after they began insulting me when I didn’t buy their rubbish. I hope that it does not get too bad and I have to start moderating comments. These conspiratorial posts are intended to warn them off while also helping educate the people that I seek, so that they can avoid those traps and rabbit holes to nowhere that have swallowed up so many people.

Best,

Wade

[Karl]

Dear Wade

I have read the book preview article on your website. And, since you invited me to comment on it here, I will do so.

First of all, I do appreciate the effort that goes into writing anything more than thoughtless phrase. Nothing below is meant as raw criticism, rather my thoughts to advance the discussion. Also, we agree on 99% and I have only commented on a few points - the article covers a lot of ground. Most of my points are minor details.

Comments generally run from start to finish of the article, preceded by a "simple quote" that can be easily looked up. In between, I will also be teasing you with references from Zemeckis' work (BTTF and Contact).
Here goes. (Grab a cup of coffee/thee.)


"There are challenges to Big Bang cosmology"

Yes. You build most of your arguments on high-quality scientific research. In my view, starting off with the Big Bang diminishes that effort.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=p8lKQMEYYLw

Check out the rest of the Sky Scholar Channel too, it is well worth your time. The liquid sun model is fascinating.


"Nobody knows quite how, but the most prominent hypothesis today is that life began in volcanic vents on the ocean floor."

Agree. Note the irony that this is one of the few exceptions of life forms that does not depend on fusion energy from the sun, as mentioned in the previous paragraph.


"That oxygenic-photosynthesis byproduct was poisonous to early life, and while there are still organisms that need oxygen-free environments to live, they are generally underground microbes"

Many gut bacteria are obligate anaerobes and are crucial to our health. (And to carbon cycling in seasonally dry climates, see below.)


"Iron is the heaviest element created by stars such as our Sun."

In the standard model, the sun is a hydrogen plasma fusion reactor. Something along those lines. In that case, only elements up to iron (Fe-56) can be synthesised, as it is the heaviest element for which a fusion reaction is exothermic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_binding_energy



Elements heavier than iron on earth come from supernovae, or from the cosmic debris that formed our solar system, because the sun is likely a second- or third-generation star. I read: 'that supernova dust came from our own sun.'


"The first animals on land were also arthropods such as scorpions and spiders – insects came later."

A bit confusing here: insects too are arthropods.



"Those first forests not only raised the oxygen levels to probably over 30% of the atmosphere"

Can you back up those 30%? I am asking because around 25% a rain forest would burn like a torch. Sounds high to me.


"One of my generalizations, which I developed from encountering social dynamics many times in my life and studies, is this: where there is plenty, there is peace."

As Martin Armstrong has put it many times: 'War does not break out when everyone is fat and happy.'


"Glacier-carved Europe north of the Alps had heavier and more resilient soils than the Fertile Crescent’s and Mediterranean’s, and agriculture came to northern Europe far later, so it has not turned into desert yet and the exploitation of fossil fuels is largely why Europe is not completely deforested today, as trees became a “primitive” fuel source. Also, northwest Europe received its precipitation from the Atlantic Ocean, which was more abundant and reliable than what the Fertile Crescent and Mediterranean civilizations received."

No. In the current climate, northwestern Europe will never be a desert. Just like New England, and Washington/British Columbia will not. If people abuse the soil to the point where their civilizations collapse... the forests will eventually regrow. Not so in the Mediterranean, the Sahel, California etc. The quantity of precipitation is not the point, or its variability/reliability. It's about its seasonality.

Check out Alan Savory's work on collapsed societies and the resulting environment.
He finds the key difference lying in seasonally dry/always moist climates, because carbon decomposition takes a different path: by microorganisms in the guts of ruminants vs. in the organic debris layer on the soil surface. Without the decomposition part, the carbon cycle stalls and the land desertifies.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=vpTHi7O66pI

For a 'local' reference, you can check out Lazy R ranch in Spokane. Say hi to Beth.
(I understand that maybe a bit of a stretch for a vegetarian.)


"After Rome fell, there was a gradual warming of northwestern Europe, which is called the Medieval Warm Period today. The watermill, which the Greeks invented and Rome used, was adopted by northwestern Europeans with their many reliable streams and rivers, on an unprecedented scale."

Interestingly, it was the invention of the 'ship-mill' (or 'boat-mill') during a siege of Rome, that was a major push for waterpower in Northwestern Europe.



Hydropower needs a height difference, a 'head', to be economically interesting. NW Europe is a lowland plain, and it's rivers have very low heads. The ship-mill was well adapted to this region.

("In 1086, when the Domesday Survey was undertaken, watermills had already produced the work of one quarter of France’s workforce."
Note that only the top of France is part of the NW European plain with flat, navigable rivers. Central, East and Southern France is hilly/mountainous. This is one of the reasons why England invented steam power, and not France: France had so much waterpower, but not England.)


"It is thought that because North and South America are isolated from each other, innovations could not readily pass between civilizations on those continents, so there was not the “ratchet effect” of innovation between those cultures."

I believe it was Jared Diamond who argued the main differences between America and Eurasia contributing to the spread of innovations were size, and lat/long orientation. (In GG&S, I believe.)
The latter is important since (climate and thus) agricultural systems are different across latitudes and thus early, agricultural innovations would not spread so easily in the Americas.


"Australia was solely a continent of hunter-gatherers as was Tasmania."

I know you know. Tasmania is not a continent.


"By the American Revolution, the British had almost completely deforested New England, but while it became warmer and drier, it did not become the semi-desert that Mezquital Valley is."

See remark above about Allan Savory and seasonally dry climates.


"Science is never really “settled.”"

Many people do not understand this fundamental difference between math and the natural sciences, whose 'laws' are often expressed in the language of math. In math, where humans define the environment and the rules, a positive proof is possible but not in the natural sciences: only negative proof exists, and nature is the final arbiter.


"1. The assassination of John F. Kennedy;

2. The 9/11 terror attacks;

3. The COVID pandemic."

1. Zemeckis' BTTF I. (Below just a random picture from the web.)



2. BTTF II (3413, prime of course): the 'Needles-scam', aka covid.



(BTTF III says the people who fell for the scam will 'crash the 'White Rolls''.)

4. BTTF II says that the next dramatic event in our lives will be a black out / power down.




"Milošević thought it highly unlikely that bin Laden would lead the 9/11 terror attacks only a couple of years after he was protected by the sitting American president."

With your insights in breakthrough technologies, I am sure you are aware of Jodie Wood's book 'Where did the tower's go?'


"To continue on Congo, soon before the “genocide” at Srebrenica there was a genuine genocide happening in Rwanda and vicinity..."

Have you checked out operation 'Crimson Mist'?


About JFK. Did you hear what Dr. Jack Kruse has to say about this?


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/wZ6g9kRag7xa



"Those 100 greatest atrocities killed 100 times..."

How many did the covid scam kill? ~25 million globally so far? The real damage - destroyed immune systems - is yet to come to light. (BTTF II's death markings, and BTTF III's crashed 'White Rolls'.)

https://tube.doctors4covidethics.org...UXZKT9KPoF7JNu


"There has been vigorous debate on how children were treated before the demographic transition. When half of the children died, many practices and attitudes of those times are similarly hard to understand for industrialized peoples."

When I was working in South Sudan, I learned that the Nuer children were not given a name before ~5y of age. Too many died.
Child theft from neighboring tribes was rampant. I am speaking about the 2000s.


"It can be said that industrial peoples have keener consciences than preindustrial peoples, but they can afford to have them."

'Erst kommt das Fressen, dann kommt die Moral', Berthold Brecht


"Also, those disease organisms for which we are vaccinated usually enter the body through the nose and mouth, not injected into the skin"

Through the skin, of course.


"Denying Global Warming, infrared capture by greenhouse gases, that melting land-based ice sheets have any impact on sea levels, or that our burning hydrocarbons contributes to the carbon dioxide rise over industrial era are some examples of the scientifically illiterate arguments that right wingers make, as they build their worldviews."

Yes, without the 'greenhouse effect' earth would be a ball of ice. Yes, the climate is changing. Yes, melting the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets would dramatically impact the sea level. Yes, the speed of change is the main problem.
But no, it is not warming. And CO2 is a lagging factor, behind temperature, not the other way around.

What seems to be transpiring is more than most people can take: the earth's magnetic field is changing (beaching dolphins and whales, and sending birds to far away continents) affecting the climate with precipitation bombs and mad hurricanes.
CO2 is a diversion from the earth's weakening/changing magnetism with the added bonus of controlling people's energy use in an age of decline.


"Global Warming deniers often take it one step further and declare that our oil deposits are abiotic and part of Earth’s formation."

Thanks for the link to the interesting paper. I knew of the theory but never really looked into it. When reading it, it becomes clear that there is no discussion that (part of the) oil is abiotic in origin. We just don't understand the proces.

Also, simple deduction reaches the same conclusion, at least as one option. If there is oil on earth and on Titan, or Hyperion and possibly other places in the solar system, then either there is life in those places, or oil is being formed abiotically. At least in part. No, the earth is not the centre of the universe, it occupies no special position. The same physical 'laws' apply here as elsewhere. We just don't understand those well enough.

The main point, of course, is what proportion of oil is a/biotic, how fast is it replenished, and will it make any difference for our energy economy? The answer to that seems to be 'negligible'.


"fish are the only vertebrates that can change their sex"

Central Bearded Dragons (Pogona vitticeps): The sex of these reptiles can be influenced by temperature during embryonic development. Higher temperatures can lead to the development of females, showcasing temperature-dependent sex determination
Common Reed Frogs (Hyperolius viridijlavus ommatostictus): These frogs can spontaneously change from female to male, particularly in populations skewed toward males
https://www.discoverwildlife.com/ani...can-change-sex
https://www.inverse.com/science/anim...ange-their-sex
Answer from perplexity.ai. I thought that crocodile eggs' sex was dependent on temperature during incubation, and so they could 'change sex'.


"A 2011 Swedish study showed that the suicide rate of people with trans surgery was 19 times the general population’s ten years after their surgeries."

Yes, I believe that about 50% ends up killing themselves.


"Trans ideology is crumbling (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)."

Interestingly, this too is spelled out in the BTTF predictions.


"To put our military adventures in oil-rich regions into perspective, the world reached Peak Oil in 2006"

Yes, and peak 'oil+dregs' in 2019, it seems. We are now on the downward slope.


"The war in Ukraine is an American triumph, it prominently used neo-Nazis (1) and Putin “took the bait,” thwarted attempts to end the war right after it began, and seems to want it to continue forever."

'The war is not meant to be won, it is meant to be continuous.' George Orwell


"We are the enemy, not global-controlling elites."

Biff as Marty's evil twin.




"The technology is not really the issue, nor is the organized suppression; humanity’s lack of integrity and sentience is the problem that dwarfs everything else."

I hate to say it. Was the covid vaccine mandate a global self-selection of intelligence and integrity?


"white male Western professionals"

I can see the case for a minimum of intelligence and life experience. But why not women? My wife has a PhD in astronomy and is way smarter than I am. But - and this is not politically correct to say - male IQ has a larger spread than female IQ, which means more idiots and more geniuses. Males start to dominate above IQ ~115 (and below ~85), which could point again to the need for a minimum intelligence.



And that sounds very much like what Zemeckis tells us about intelligence in Contact.




"before I am too old to do it"

You too will live to be 100.

Kind regards
Karl

[Wade Frazier]

Thanks Karl. Good stuff. I'll reply soon.

Best,

Wade

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Karl (here)
But - and this is not politically correct to say - male IQ has a larger spread than female IQ, which means more idiots and more geniuses.

Yup ... or as I like to say it, the village wise man and the village idiot are usually both men.

[Wade Frazier]

From Substack:

The USA’s national security state and I go way back, even before I was born. One grandfather fought in World War I (and nearly died in it), the other served in World War II (and came back an emotional wreck), and my father was a Marine in Korea. I nearly became a soldier myself, and both of my brothers became soldiers. My wife’s father was in World War II (and nearly died), and both of her brothers were in the military. If there was The American Way in those Superman days, it was serving in the military. I was raised in a military household in a military community in history’s most globally dominant empire. My father had to get a top-secret security clearance to work at NASA during the Space Race.

Before I ever met Dennis Lee, I heard about my close relative’s secret life as a CIA contract agent who worked for Henry Kissinger. He nearly tried to recruit me into the family “business.” Dennis was a paratrooping medic who was dropped into Cambodia to clean up a CIA operation gone bad, to help keep alive the fiction that the USA was not at war with Cambodia. During my days with Dennis, the CIA offered him a billion dollars to fold the operation before they lowered the boom on us. While Dennis was in solitary confinement, I met With Gary Wean, in my efforts to help Dennis. Gary’s advice was critical in helping me spring Dennis from jail, in the biggest miracle that I ever witnessed. Gary’s book had a chapter in it about the CIA’s involvement in the operation that got JFK killed.

The next year, 1990, as I began my media studies at the scholarly feet of Noam Chomsky and Ed Herman, I saw an ad for a memoir of a CIA case officer named Ralph McGehee. I began reading it that autumn. After a moving introduction that included Ralph’s devastating moment of awakening in a hotel in Saigon in 1968, when Ralph finally realized what the CIA really did and he nearly killed himself, the book was a dry read in its early chapters. I put the book aside about halfway through it, in the stack of publications that I was reading, next to my bed. I remember looking at the book that autumn, thinking that I needed to finish it, even if it was dry reading. I quickly learned that the startling revelations had yet to come. By the book’s end, it was one of the most influential works that I ever read.

In the mid-1960s, Ralph was at the top of his game as a case officer in Thailand, fighting the communist insurgency, and he developed a method to flush out the communists and reverse communist inroads in Thailand. His effort won him universal praise in intelligence circles, but as he soon discovered when briefing William Colby on his findings, Ralph had come up with the wrong answer. The Thai peasants did not cooperate with the communists due to terror or coercion, as the CIA stated at the time, but because the communists were truly helpful to the peasants and provided an alternative to neocolonial exploitation.

Ralph’s highly successful program was soon canceled and he found himself behind a meaningless desk at Langley. Ralph was confused by what had happened, but was so gung-ho that he volunteered for Vietnam in 1968, which nobody sane did. During his stint in Vietnam, Ralph finally understood: the CIA was the handmaiden of genocide. Ralph left Vietnam a ruined man, but the night that he nearly killed himself, he made a personal pledge to expose what the CIA really was and did. Ralph became one of those zombies that John Stockwell wrote about, shuffling through the halls at Langley, counting his days to retirement, but Ralph was also getting educated in the CIA’s archives, in preparation for the book that he planned to write.

Ralph got lucky, in a way. Watergate and the Church Committee hearings dragged the CIA through the mud, the CIA soon offered early-retirement packages, and Ralph leapt at the opportunity.

Ralph diligently worked on his book in his retirement. Until this millennium, Ralph was one of only two ex-CIA employees who abided by their secrecy agreements in publishing their CIA-critical memoirs. The other was Victor Marchetti. Ralph and Victor engaged in epic legal battles with the CIA to publish their memoirs, and the published versions were riddled with censorship deletions. Marchetti wrote a book to describe his legal battles with the CIA. Ralph called the CIA an unsalvageable organization and called for its abolition in Deadly Deceits. Ralph said that the primary target of the CIA’s lies was the American public.

Ralph then founded CIABASE, which exposed the CIA by using public-domain sources. Ralph also hit the speaking tour, talking around the world about what the CIA is and does. Ralph is featured in Bill Moyers’s The Secret Government documentary.

In 1996, when I wrote my first website, I discussed works that influenced my worldview, and I wrote a section on Deadly Deceits. I contacted Ralph for his permission to publish it and he gave his blessing. My original site came down in early 1997 and it did not reappear for years. In 1998, as I was deep into my studies that led to my site largely as it stands today, I surfed around to see what of my work might have survived on the Internet. Somebody reproduced my entire site, and I discovered that my section on Deadly Deceits was plastered all over the Internet. I began asking around about that, and at a site run by a former spook who became a lefty, who had published my Deadly Deceits section, I asked who gave it to him, and he replied that Ralph did. Ralph considered my little write-up to be the defining summary of his work. It was the first time that I got feedback like that, that my work was considered competent by an expert in the subjects that I wrote about.

Ralph was one of the overgrown Boy Scouts that I encountered on my journey, one of those disillusioned idealists that comprise my target audience. He was one of my early finds like that, and it helped establish my template for the people that I seek. As far as my summary of Deadly Deceits went, I think that it takes one to know one, which is why we resonated and became friends. When I had a letter to the editor published in the Seattle Times in 1998, in which I predicted something like 9/11 (and my family warned me that I was going to get into trouble), Ralph was amazed that any American newspaper would publish something like that. He said that the East Coast papers would never run something like that. Around that time, I was invited to be on a radio show but kept my head down and kept studying and writing. I marched on the eve of the 1999 WTO meeting, and the next day, Ralph watched the imposition of martial law in Seattle with amazement. Ralph was appreciative of my report on some of the USA’s methods of interrogation used in Vietnam.

The CIA harassed Ralph, gadfly that he was. Ralph lived only a few miles from Langley, and he was targeted by the local police and businesses, to make his life there miserable. Ralph also received threats and was even injured by their harassment. When Ralph reached his 70s, he was worn out from the battle and went into his second retirement. He sold off his 1,000-volume intelligence library to a university for almost nothing, and I bought a few things from it. Ralph then moved with his wife to Florida in 2001, to be near his family, and the FBI immediately began harassing him. He sent me a statement to publish, which I did, and he said that it helped take the heat off of him, but maybe he was just being generous.

The 9/11 terror attacks were the next month, and Ralph dropped out of sight soon after that. We didn’t have any contact after early 2002, as I recall. He just wanted to quietly live out his last years, he was tired of the battle, and I left him alone. Ralph died of COVID in 2020, and I am in touch with his family. Like with most whistleblowers, Ralph’s own family was not very supportive and most considered his tales of harassment to be a product of his imagination. Oh, how I know that feeling. I lost many friendships and family relationships during my journey, and still do.

Unlike Ed Herman’s libelous Wikipedia biography, Ralph’s Wikipedia biography is a fair one, at least for now, and I had nothing to do with it. It used to link to my Ralph essay, but Philip Cross and friends have long since erased anything related to me at Wikipedia.

Ralph was a great man, an all-too-rare man of conscience who could not stay silent. He is in my pantheon and I miss him.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Karl:

Your nice post will take more than one post to respond to. On your Back to the Future references, Dennis Lee and his wife believed that their “God” talked to them through movies. Dennis also thinks that the Bible is some kind of magical word of God. I recently wrote a post on basing scientific theories on literalist interpretations of ancient texts. I doubt that that is a valid way to go about it.

In recent years, I read that the point of literature and entertainment such as movies is to increase human empathy, and I’ll buy that. I was a movie junkie while young, but I never thought that my creator was speaking to me through movies, or more than in any other way (dreams, books, nature, answering prayers (1, 2 ), etc.). Another school of thought among conspiracists is that the global elite reveal their plans through movies and other works of art. It seems that some conspiracists think that elites do that so that when their plans come to fruition, they can say, “We told you what we were going to do,” or fulfil some kind of cosmic disclosure requirement. Another theory is that in their arrogance and misanthropy, the global elite laugh at us “idiots” for falling into the trap that they telegraphed. Another one is that “White Hats” employ similar means, to slowly raise human conscious with pro-ET themes, for instance. I don’t subscribe to any of that very much, and even if true, such tactics would be to manipulate the sleeping, and I am not looking for the sleeping!

On that post on literalist interpretations, I mentioned how I stumbled into the Velikovsky issue. Velikovsky was the grandfather of today’s electric-universe ideas, but similar ideas go back to the man who first correctly described how the auroras worked, a Nobel laureate took the ideas further, and it is called plasma cosmology today. Plasma cosmologists do not believe in the Big Bang and an expanding universe. I have dipped my cup into those waters now and then over the past 30 years, and there may be something to it, but these are fiercely contested areas. That is one big rabbit hole to dive into.

As I have written, I have encountered quite a few alternative physics models over the years. Sparky Sweet had his own version, to help explain why his free energy device worked, and all that I know is that it did. The principles behind what my friend saw in his underground technology show upend orthodox physics. Does “there was no Big Bang” come out of that? Beats me, but I am not going to start an essay by promoting a steady-state universe, although that may be the case. I have several books in my library that argue for the steady-state model. Halton Arp was probably the most famous recent astronomer who argued for a steady-state universe, and I did mention him in that essay. But I am not going to go down those rabbit holes in that essay. If and when those technologies come into the open (and the ETs! ), then we will know a lot more. Until then, I am not going stray too far from the orthodox reservation, especially when scientists around me doubt that electric-universe theory is valid.

I don’t like to wax too mystically in my work, but sometimes I will cite some of my favorite sources when it seems relevant. Seth said that our universe is steady-state, while Michael said that the universe oscillates between matter and antimatter states, expanding and collapsing, which aligns with plasma cosmology. If any of that helps free energy happen, then I am all ears, but it is a bridge or four too far for my work today. Just citing that there are challenges is plenty for me, and I am not going to throw my lot in with any of them. When that exotic tech comes into the open, then we will see which theories best explain them, if any.

Another aspect of your post that I will reply to in this post is the idea that levels of precipitation are not determinative of desert conditions. That is another body of fringe theory, as far as I can see. Savory is considered pretty cranky (1), and I looked for some support on the carbon-cycling theory that you mentioned, and could not really find anything. I would be happy to buy a cheap Kindle book on the subject, if you have any suggestions! Heck, I’ll even take a good website on the subject. When I dip into the orthodox puddle of why Europe does not have deserts (1, 2, 3) and why other areas do, they are the reasons that I am familiar with. I may write a post on this one day. I have studied the issue for many years, going back to dinosaurs and Greenhouse Earth to the declining carbon dioxide levels over the eons. When I drive from Stevens Pass toward Lake Chelan, I go from rainforest to desert in an hour. I don’t know where else on Earth that you can do that. That is all about precipitation.

Your comments on carbon dioxide levels and Global Warming are off-base, IMO. In the current ice age, yes, carbon dioxide levels have reacted to the ice sheets, and carbon-dioxide levels rose when the ice sheets melted and exposed all of that land. But the ultimate cause of our ice age is declining carbon-dioxide levels. Carbon dioxide traps infrared radiation, which is the primary dynamic of how greenhouse gases work, and the 50% increase in carbon dioxide since the 1800s will dramatically warm Earth. The evidence of it has been in my face for the past generation. Increasing carbon-dioxide levels comprise the primary driver of that.

On sex changes, I probably should have written that no mammals can change their sex. I may have to revise that, but so-called sex changes before hatching don’t really count in the argument that I was making. Frogs can change sex after hatching, half-fish that they are, but only as tadpoles (their fish-phase). Maybe I’ll just change it to say that mammals can’t change their sex. Thanks for the challenge.

There is more to come, but that is enough for today.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

From Substack:

The last email that I ever received from Ed Herman copied me into one of his close circles. That was how I met Sam Husseini. Ed died a couple of months later, and Sam helped get Ed’s obituary published in the New York Times and Washington Post. Sam has my undying gratitude for that alone. The New York Times’s obituary was an inadvertent confirmation of Ed and Noam Chomsky’s Propaganda Model. I already knew who Sam was, as I had read some of his work, beginning in the 1990s, as he was a prominent left journalist and his articles appeared in numerous publications.

I began writing about the COVID pandemic early on, and a year later, Sam inaugurated his Substack site, with a post on Big Tech censorship around COVID, which was right down my alley. I have read all of his Substack posts since then. Sam is an unusual journalist in that he is also a political activist. His VotePact.org is an attempt to overcome the duopoly of American retail politics. Sam worked for the USA’s first Arabic Senator, who was far more radical than today’s “Squad.”

Sam may be the first journalist on Earth who suggested that COVID may have had a lab origin. Sam coauthored a scientific paper on the possible lab origin of an Ebola outbreak in Africa in 2014. Sam is not just any old journalist, to coauthor a scientific paper, and his brilliant mind is evident in his writings. Sam’s father was Palestinian, driven from his home by the Zionists in 1948, so the Palestinian issue has long been one of Sam’s focuses as a journalist, especially during this Israeli genocide in Gaza. Sam’s articles have brought me to tears at times. Sam has become quite a fixture on the Internet interview circuit in recent years, with videos splashed across YouTube and elsewhere.

One of Sam’s activities is badgering officials, to get them to lie to escape his questions (even Jimmy Carter), and he has made a name for himself in recent years at State Department briefings. Sam was famously dragged out of a Trump-Putin press conference and jailed for holding up a sign to ask a question about nuclear disarmament. Sam became a member of my pantheon years ago. Unlike Ed’s libelous Wikipedia bio, Sam’s is not too bad.

There are not many like Sam on Earth. Sam’s work helped inspire my Substack experiment, and Sam kindly reposted one of my posts on Ed. Go Sam.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

From Substack:

This post will be about my host at the Avalon Forum, Bill Ryan. For several years, I took on all-comers on my site, with my email address on it. I met quite a few of my pals that way. I have not been associated with Dennis Lee’s efforts since 1997. He is the 800-pound gorilla of my life, but I had to do my own thing, and I strongly doubt that the businessman’s path to free energy will work. I had serious doubts after my first catastrophic stint with Dennis, I was certain of it after my second stint, and I have not been interested in that approach ever since. The free-energy field is in a state of arrested development, focused on inventors with their gizmos, scientists with their theories, business opportunities, banging on the doors of the rich and powerful, mired in pointless and paranoid conspiracism, retail politics, scarcity-based ideologies, etc. It is time for the love and enlightenment approach, in which people stop giving their power away and find it within themselves, which is far easier said than done, in our world of scarcity and fear.

But Dennis kept trying to get me involved, until I gave him no for an answer enough times. I had to do my own thing, which is reflected in my public writings. Nobody had ever tried it before, so I had to do it. I can’t hurt, it could be the critical missing piece, and it was worth the rest of my life to find out. No regrets.

While I was studying and writing, Dennis was out raising hell, with national barnstorming tours and the like, and I was continually approached by people who were involved with Dennis. They came to the wrong place, wanting me to weigh in on Dennis’s efforts, attacking me, and so on. After 9/11, my nation lost its sanity, and the attacks became increasingly crazed and vicious, including from at least one government official, and in early 2002 I stopped interacting with the public. I was also wrestling with a monster of midlife crisis, which did not begin to end until Dennis invited me to the White House in 2006 and I got professional help.

In late 2006, I began engaging the public again, in forums where I saw my work discussed. Internet forums had turned into a sewer during my absence, trolls swarmed me wherever I appeared, and I had my own Internet stalker. I soon stopped trying that approach, and was deep into the studies that led to my lifetime’s most significant essay, which took a year to write. But an essay that I wrote in 2007 brought Brian O’Leary back into my life, after our disastrous foray into trying to form a mass movement around free energy. I was finally forever cured of that approach. The next year, I had my first published interview, thanks to Brian’s influence, and the next year is when Bill Ryan came into my life. Brian and I had an interview with Bill and Kerry Cassidy. It will always be my favorite interview, as I will never do another with Brian.

I had thought that Brian was the sole reason why I had that interview with Bill and Kerry, but I later discovered that Bill began reading my work nearly a decade earlier. With my forum experiences in 2007, when troll-admin alliances booted or chased me out of forums, and the trolls were almost always anonymous cowards, I decided that the only forum that I would join was one that I controlled. As fate would have it, Bill was having his own adventures with running a forum, and he finally realized what I did: anonymous-member forums would not work for developing constructive discussions. So, Bill created his current Avalon forum, which does not have anonymous members, at least to Bill and his administrators, and they have a quick hook, thankfully. In early 2011, I saw my work being discussed in Bill’s forum, I joined up, and I have been there ever since, at over 7,000 posts and counting. Bill and friends have kept the trolls at bay. The attacks there have been few and far between, and the few trolls usually attack me privately (and always anonymously to me), but they have only been a minor nuisance. I also have my own forum, ready for the people that I seek to have a home (usually after tryouts at Avalon), and now I am at Substack, where I can instantly ban assailants, but I have only had to ban about one a month so far. I will not tolerate assailants and trolls. They get about one chance from me, and that is all the time that I will waste on them.

Bill’s savoir-faire is legendary, and it has always been a pleasure to interact with him and his team. There are not many hosts on the Internet like Bill, and he is in my pantheon.

Best,

Wade

[Bill Ryan]

Thank you for all the very kind words...!!

[Wade Frazier]

They are merited!