The Murder of United Healthcare CEO, Brian Thompson

[Akasha]

Grace's five cents:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=6GcMvCKP1NI

[Akasha]

Riley Walz, on video here explaining how he scraped Lyft data to figure out which citibike was used for the escape, coincidentally bears an uncanny resemblance to the man of the moment:

[Hamish]

Hello,

For me this short video commenting on the gun and killer, was interesting to me and the person is the video with the main comments is John "Shrek" McPhee a retired U.S. Army Special Operations Sergeant Major.

https://x.com/i/status/1864706224907747361

[T Smith]

Can someone make sense of this video report at the 48 second mark, where it appears the camera is shooting a scene in a movie, and from the omniscient vantage following the suspect of interest on the bicycle down the street? Do surveillance cameras do this sort of thing?

This may be a sophisticated feature of surveillance these days--I don't know--but on random subjects who just so happen to be the alleged killer? Why not the garbage truck behind the man riding the bicycle or the man walking on the sidewalk?

I'm not necessarily saying there isn't an explanation; just confused.

[SilentFeathers]

Posted by T Smith (here)
Can someone make sense of this video report at the 48 second mark, where it appears the camera is shooting a scene in a movie, and from the omniscient vantage following the suspect of interest on the bicycle down the street? Do surveillance cameras do this sort of thing?

This may be a sophisticated feature of surveillance these days--I don't know--but on random subjects who just so happen to be the alleged killer? Why not the garbage truck behind the man riding the bicycle or the man walking on the sidewalk?

I'm not necessarily saying there isn't an explanation; just confused.

It looks fake to me, as far as I know street surveillance cameras like that do not single out a subject and follow them down the street.

The weirdness and fakery about this killing is somehow reminding me of the Trump shooting in Butler, PA.

[Mike]

Posted by Akasha (here)

Posted by Mike (here)

Posted by Moemers (here)
why and who would manufacture that?

To cause division and chaos......

Well if that was the aim, it failed miserably. Perhaps you aren’t spending much time on X etc…. but judging by the posts, memes and comments, it has overwhelmingly “caused” solidarity and focus against these mega-parasites, and rightly so.

“They” would never have wanted that. “They” are now spending a large portion of their income on extra security as well as frantically deleting their LinkdIn pages and other web info'.

Their crimes have gone unpunished for time and now their f#cking around is leading to their finding out. We like to conspiratorialise (is that a word?) about everything on here, but sometimes a spade is a spade.

It’s funny because everybody is assuming this guy is on the run. Perhaps the reason he didn’t leave his gun in his backpack is because he is just getting started, and, re’ Eric Adams’s retarded comment about “him continue(ing) to believe he can hide behind the mask”, well he ain’t gonna be believing that anymore is he, Eric, cause of you and your big mouth. The police like to present this "you can run but you can't hide" idiom as a deterrent, and Hollywood faithfully endorses it, but the uncomfortable fact remains: there are many criminals on the loose.

I don't spend any time on X. But judging by what you've just said about the activity there, it supports what I've posted here i.e. rallying the bitter and resentful crowd and normalizing the assassination of CEO's...which - correct me if I'm wrong - you seem strangely enthusiastic about. I'm suggesting the murder and it's associated symbolism (the monopoly money, the writing on the casings) was designed to look like it was done as a political act to trigger the very predictable reactions we're seeing now from very predictable people( bitter, anti-capitalist, woke Marxist types). Something like a false flag event..

The "they" I'm referring to aren't CEO's of healthcare companies and their peers. The "they" I'm talking about are the billionaires in the shadows that seek to destabilize the west and our way of life.

[Moemers]

why would Billionaires want to destabilize "the west and our way of life?" by shooting a CEO and one of their own

I know you tried to explain this on page 2 but there a billion different ways to "trigger woke, marxist types" (which is another thing I'd like you to explain lol) and im not sure you're seeing the reactions online, but no one is really upset about this, especially in the light of the AI claim denial information

so their plan is a false flag ...to ignite class solidarity so people kill more rich CEOs? why would they want to do that?

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Moemers (here)
why would Billionaires want to destabilize "the west and our way of life?"

What an excellent question!

[Moemers]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Moemers (here)
why would Billionaires want to destabilize "the west and our way of life?"

What an excellent question!

hahahahahahaha ok, i edited it a little bit because i saw what i did there lol

NAFTA destabilizes the West - shooting CEOs doesnt

[Akasha]

Posted by T Smith (here)
Can someone make sense of this video report at the 48 second mark, where it appears the camera is shooting a scene in a movie, and from the omniscient vantage following the suspect of interest on the bicycle down the street? Do surveillance cameras do this sort of thing?

This may be a sophisticated feature of surveillance these days--I don't know--but on random subjects who just so happen to be the alleged killer? Why not the garbage truck behind the man riding the bicycle or the man walking on the sidewalk?

I'm not necessarily saying there isn't an explanation; just confused.

Static footage zoomed into the action in post production? So the CCTV camera wasn't following him but the post-editing of that footage is focused on his movement. Just a guess though.

[Moemers]

Posted by Akasha (here)

Posted by T Smith (here)
Can someone make sense of this video report at the 48 second mark, where it appears the camera is shooting a scene in a movie, and from the omniscient vantage following the suspect of interest on the bicycle down the street? Do surveillance cameras do this sort of thing?

This may be a sophisticated feature of surveillance these days--I don't know--but on random subjects who just so happen to be the alleged killer? Why not the garbage truck behind the man riding the bicycle or the man walking on the sidewalk?

I'm not necessarily saying there isn't an explanation; just confused.

Static footage zoomed into the action in post production? So the CCTV camera wasn't following him but the post-editing of that footage is focused on his movement. Just a guess though.

yeah this happens a lot. any netflix documentary will stitch cctv together and move it around for the drama and continuity

[Mike]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Moemers (here)
why would Billionaires want to destabilize "the west and our way of life?"

What an excellent question!

Because they're largely globalists

[Akasha]

Posted by Mike (here)

Posted by Akasha (here)

Posted by Mike (here)

Posted by Moemers (here)
why and who would manufacture that?

To cause division and chaos......

Well if that was the aim, it failed miserably. Perhaps you aren’t spending much time on X etc…. but judging by the posts, memes and comments, it has overwhelmingly “caused” solidarity and focus against these mega-parasites, and rightly so.

“They” would never have wanted that. “They” are now spending a large portion of their income on extra security as well as frantically deleting their LinkdIn pages and other web info'.

Their crimes have gone unpunished for time and now their f#cking around is leading to their finding out. We like to conspiratorialise (is that a word?) about everything on here, but sometimes a spade is a spade.

It’s funny because everybody is assuming this guy is on the run. Perhaps the reason he didn’t leave his gun in his backpack is because he is just getting started, and, re’ Eric Adams’s retarded comment about “him continue(ing) to believe he can hide behind the mask”, well he ain’t gonna be believing that anymore is he, Eric, cause of you and your big mouth. The police like to present this "you can run but you can't hide" idiom as a deterrent, and Hollywood faithfully endorses it, but the uncomfortable fact remains: there are many criminals on the loose.

I don't spend any time on X. But judging by what you've just said about the activity there, it supports what I've posted here i.e. rallying the bitter and resentful crowd and normalizing the assassination of CEO's...which - correct me if I'm wrong - you seem strangely enthusiastic about. I'm suggesting the murder and it's associated symbolism (the monopoly money, the writing on the casings) was designed to look like it was done as a political act to trigger the very predictable reactions we're seeing now from very predictable people( bitter, anti-capitalist, woke Marxist types). Something like a false flag event..

The "they" I'm referring to aren't CEO's of healthcare companies and their peers. The "they" I'm talking about are the billionaires in the shadows that seek to destabilize the west and our way of life.

Yes Mike, you are wrong about my enthusiasm over his murder. I am simply pointing out that if you play stupid games, you win stupid prizes, regardless of who owns the game "in the shadows".

Thompson and his ilk are playing stupid, and as we have now witnessed, very dangerous games. Perhaps this will encourage them to play with people's lives more sensibly. After all, when it is clear justice won't be served in the courts, it is only a matter of time before it is served in the streets.

But of course it remains entirely possible that this is all contrived and, in fact, a Sörös-funded crackhead was responsible.

[Moemers]

I'm just not convinced. Name a time when some "Soros Funded Asssassin" was allowed to get away? Don't they always just take them out?

[Akasha]

Posted by Mike (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Moemers (here)
why would Billionaires want to destabilize "the west and our way of life?"

What an excellent question!

Because they're largely globalists

So are the CEOs and board members.

[Mike]

Posted by Moemers (here)
why would Billionaires want to destabilize "the west and our way of life?" by shooting a CEO and one of their own

I know you tried to explain this on page 2 but there a billion different ways to "trigger woke, marxist types" (which is another thing I'd like you to explain lol) and im not sure you're seeing the reactions online, but no one is really upset about this, especially in the light of the AI claim denial information

so their plan is a false flag ...to ignite class solidarity so people kill more rich CEOs? why would they want to do that?

Billionaires have been seeking to destroy the west and our way of life for the last 2 decades. Who do you think has been funding the Marxist, woke radicals? The DEI initiatives? The Critical Race Theory contagion? The billionaires have funded it. George Soros happens to be one, but he's just a cog in a much larger machine that includes entities like BlackRock, The Vanguard group, or any other investment firms that insist on the ESG charade.

They're globalists. They're still going to be billionaires if and when the west crumbles. The whole point is to consolidate their power. These guys don't care if a CEO has to die to further their agenda.

There are a billion ways to trigger woke Marxists, yes, but what more dramatic way than assassinating a CEO - the very symbol of their "oppression" - in broad daylight? And yes, there are a group of lunatics on X who are unbothered and even giddy over the murder, and I'm speculating that this was the point of the assassination - to rally that group and cause division between percieved haves and have nots.

[Mike]

Posted by Akasha (here)

Posted by Mike (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Moemers (here)
why would Billionaires want to destabilize "the west and our way of life?"

What an excellent question!

Because they're largely globalists

So are the CEOs and board members.

Not necessarily.

Billionaires are completely different animals than millionaires..and hierarchically occupy an entirely different space in the grand scheme of things.

Brian Thompson made a little over $10 million a year. That's small beer compared to the people I'm talking about.

I know a couple millionaires. They're not uncommon, and most are not globalists. The same cannot be said of billionaires.

[Moemers]

perceived haves and have nots?

sorry bud, theres no perception here. the wealth disparity is the largest it's ever been. I see an Ancient Aliens kind of argument here - humans weren't smart/capable/advanced enough to build the pyramids, so it had to be the aliens. People aren't upset enough with 1/3 of UHC claims being denied by an AI with a 90% error rate to do this themselves - nope, had to be the billionaires egging them on.

name another time a "Sorors Funded Assassination" ended with the person getting away, leaving all sorts of cheeky little symbols behind? that's not ever how it works dude.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

[Akasha]

Posted by Mike (here)

Posted by Akasha (here)

Posted by Mike (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Moemers (here)
why would Billionaires want to destabilize "the west and our way of life?"

What an excellent question!

Because they're largely globalists

So are the CEOs and board members.

Not necessarily.

Billionaires are completely different animals than millionaires..and hierarchically occupy an entirely different space in the grand scheme of things.

Brian Thompson made a little over $10 million a year. That's small beer compared to the people I'm talking about.

I know a couple millionaires. They're not uncommon, and most are not globalists. The same cannot be said of billionaires.

Mike, we are in danger of going down a rabbit hole here because, as we both know, there are millionaires and there are are millionaires.

There are the corporate Brian Thompson millionaires of this world, making billions of dollars of profit for their shareholders (Blackrock et al), which begs the question, why kill (by proxy) someone who is making you piles of wonga?.....and there are the self-made millionaires with their own successful businesses.

I'd be the first to accept that the latter may well be anti-globalist and I suspect your couple of rich acquaintances fall into that category.

But, and it is a big but, we are talking about the first category aren't we?

Brian Thompson and the board of United Health were doing a pretty good job of destabilising the Western way of life, wouldn't you say?

[SilentFeathers]

Many are not talking about Thompson being investigated by the corrupt DOJ for insider trader and fraud.

He likely pissed some people off for the DOJ to be putting their boot on his neck. Perhaps he knew secret things that made some deep state power brokers nervous?

The current narrative wants every one to look at disgruntled employees or angry insurance policy recipients who were ripped off, when perhaps we should be looking in another direction.