Weaponising the Weather

[onawah]

What’s happening in the skies? Congress must investigate geoengineering
https://standforhealthfreedom.com/actions/skies/
Published: Mar 26, 2025

"Our Stand: At-A-Glance
Twenty-four states, including Tennessee and Florida, are introducing legislation to ban geoengineering and cloud seeding, but states need federal support to succeed.
One of the toughest questions about geoengineering: What exactly is happening?
First, we want to know what’s going on. Who is doing what, and who has oversight?
Geoengineering brings up unique and nuanced issues; the skies don’t stop at a state line!
Congress can use their national platform to investigate federal agencies and other contractors, NGOs, and foreign interests to find out exactly what is happening in our skies and under what authority.
In 2024, current Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. publicly called out these practices, tweeting: “We are going to stop this crime.” The American people agree.
Use our prewritten letter, or write your own, to urge Congress to help states preserve the health of their citizens by investigating geoengineering.

The United States is being subjected to unauthorized and unregulated atmospheric weather modification, including atmospheric aerosol injection (AAI) — a form of geoengineering deceptively promoted as “climate mitigation.” These operations are occurring without public knowledge, consent, or congressional approval, and they pose a direct threat to public health, agriculture, the environment, and national security.

Federal agencies, private contractors, NGOs, and foreign interests are carrying out these programs with no oversight. While Harvard University’s Solar Geoengineering Research Program and other entities have made public efforts to inject particles into the atmosphere to “dim the sun,” other experiments are happening covertly, year-round. Even new companies like Stardust, launched in 2023, aim to develop proprietary technologies to block sunlight, yet there’s no legal framework, informed consent, or safety guarantees.

Twenty-four states, including Tennessee and Florida, are introducing legislation to ban geoengineering and cloud seeding, but states need federal support to succeed.

One of the toughest questions about geoengineering: What exactly is happening?

Geoengineering brings up unique and nuanced issues; the skies don’t stop at a state line! This is the time we need the federal government to support states the most in their individual health policies and concerns.

In 2024, current Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. publicly called out these practices, tweeting: “We are going to stop this crime.” The American people agree.

First, we want to know what’s going on. Who is doing what, and who has oversight? We call on U.S. Congress to:

Initiate immediate congressional investigative hearings. Conduct full-scale public hearings on geoengineering, weather modification, and atmospheric aerosol injection programs. These hearings must include whistleblower testimony, agency disclosures, and independent scientific review.
Demand full transparency and public disclosure. Require all agencies, contractors, and NGOs involved in weather modification or solar radiation management to disclose operations, funding, and materials used. We demand informed public consent.
Support state sovereignty. Assist the 24 states that are advancing legislation to ban geoengineering and protect their right to govern their own skies and safeguard public health.
Hold perpetrators accountable. Investigate all actors — governmental and nongovernmental — who are engaging in unauthorized atmospheric interventions. Pursue legal action where rights, laws, and treaties have been violated.
Enact a national ban on imposed weather modification. Introduce federal legislation prohibiting any form of weather modification, aerosol injection, or geoengineering within the United States or its airspace without full public transparency and consent.

Why does this matter? Geoengineering creates:

A public health crisis. Aerosolized heavy metals and other chemical agents have been linked to neurodegenerative diseases, lung disorders, cardiovascular conditions, and immune system suppression. These toxins infiltrate our air, water, and food supply without public disclosure or consent.
Ecological and agricultural destruction. Geoengineering disrupts natural weather cycles, soil composition, and plant health, leading to increased droughts, extreme weather, and food shortages. Many states are already suffering due to artificially manipulated weather patterns that disrupt the earth’s natural cycles.
National security risks. Weaponized weather modification and climate manipulation pose serious threats to national security. Unregulated activities could be exploited by adversarial nations or private interests for economic and strategic gains.
A violation of U.S. and international law. Geoengineering bypasses congressional authority, state rights, and global treaties, undermining both American sovereignty and the rule of law."

[onawah]

Americans Are Fed Up!
Stand for Health Freedom
3/28/25


In just 24 hours, over 20,000 emails have been sent to Congress demanding an investigation into unauthorized geoengineering and atmospheric spraying.

People are taking a stand for transparency, accountability, and the right to clean skies.

The momentum is building—will your voice be heard? Keep the pressure on. Tell Congress: We did NOT consent."

[ExomatrixTV]

source

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=s10fN9ATo8Y

The Florida Senate passed a bill on Thursday banning weather manipulation, things like cloud seeding and geo-engineering.

The Florida State Senate has passed a bill that would ban the spraying of chemicals into the atmosphere to manipulate the weather, also known as geoengineering.

The bill was introduced by Senator Ileana Garcia because citizens are very concerned about the effects of the chemicals on public health. “I sometimes have a problem with people spraying perfume around me. Don’t you have a problem with them spraying things into the atmosphere, that you don’t even know what it is or what they’re doing?” she asked.

“There are contrails and there are chemtrails, which are not yet understood,” she told the Senate.

Protecting residents from left-wing climate agenda

Governor Ron DeSantis also supports the law, which would ban chemtrails, among other things. Similar bills have been introduced in eight other U.S. states.

Attorney General James Uthmeier also expressed support for the bill on social media , saying it was important to protect Floridians from the left-wing climate agenda.

Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo thanked Senator Garcia for her efforts. These planes are spraying aluminum, sulfates and other substances with unknown and harmful effects on public health into our air, he wrote on X .

Hotline

Nicole Shanahan, former running mate of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., points out that real change will come when we reveal who is funding these projects and implement a nationwide ban.

There are also plans to set up a special hotline where people can report suspicious traces in the air.
Five years in prison

If DeSantis signs the bill, anyone responsible for chemtrails in Florida could face up to five years in prison and a $100,000 fine.

• dutch 🇳🇱 (+ Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[ExomatrixTV]

source

• Prep Act Gives U.S. Army The Right To Spray Americans With Poisons:

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v6ps6u1/?pub=ir01b

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[ExomatrixTV]

• High Risk British Research:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=eRiTbpMPThU

Petition Make all forms of 'geo-engineering' affecting the environment illegal
We want all forms of geo-engineering to be illegal in the UK. Earth's natural systems.

• petition.parliament.uk/petitions/701963

Advanced Research and Invention Agency

• aria.org.uk

• gov.uk/government/organisations/advanced-research-and-invention-agency

• en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Vallance

Sir Patrick Vallance stays on at the UK’s Agency for world-changing ideas

• gov.uk/government/news/sir-patrick-vallance-stays-on-at-the-uks-agency-for-world-changing-ideas

Research agency supporting high risk, high reward research formally established

• gov.uk/government/news/research-agency-supporting-high-risk-high-reward-research-formally-established

• gov.uk/government/publications/advanced-research-and-invention-agency-aria-statement-of-policy-intent/advanced-research-and-invention-agency-aria-policy-statement

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=sI27iYOlZZA

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[ExomatrixTV]

• RFK Jr's Running Mate Claims America Has A Top-secret Program Spraying Chemicals Into The Air

[ExomatrixTV]

• Weather Control & “DIMMING The Sun” Is REAL & Poisoning Humans! w/ Dane Wigington:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=fjewLe9c8Ak

[jaybee]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

• Weather Control & “DIMMING The Sun” Is REAL & Poisoning Humans! w/ Dane Wigington:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=fjewLe9c8Ak

I was watching this video with interest but I became confused around the 31:35 mark when the part about RFK Jr came on....... he (Bobby Kennedy) wasn't saying that the plane exhausts were 'doing it' (aka con trails) he was saying that all the dangerous, poisonous crap was being ADDED to the plane and airliner fuel to disperse it - so why was his reply misinterpreted like that.....?

In a video on another thread HERE Norman posted Jim Lee talking about all the same kind of stuff..... but Jim Lee had a rant about how people jumped on him and said he was a government shill - a spreader of disinformation because he talked about all the dangerous poisons etc being ADDED to jet /plane fuel...... because that way all the planes that fly everyday would aid the geoengineering - like...the perpetrators realised they could USE the regular use of airliners and military planes etc if they put all the crap in the fuel......... it seemed to me that Bobby Kennedy was being deliberately misunderstood and maligned -

so do 'they' put it in aviation fuel or not...? I was fairly convinced that they do after listening to Jim Lee and now Dane Wigington who (like Jim Lee) says he has studied the subject for 20 or so years.... glossed over that point - and when Jimmy enquired / wondered if Kennedy was just saying it to essentially keep the perpetrators off his back - that it was a concession to being on the Inside....Wigington agreed with that.....

I wasn't too convinced by Wigington's reason for why his work was still up on Youtube, either, and had many millions of views........he said because it was factual and accurate...?............I would have thought THAT would be a reason for it to be taken down - with Youtube's track record....Google's track record...???

But he (like Lee) is (on the face of it) educating people about geoengineering....? so maybe it was just a blip with him deliberately misunderstanding what Bobby Kennedy said - no one's perfect I suppose.......it just bothered me....

because Bobby Kennedy is actually in a position to look into the 'adding to aviation fuel' business and expose it....

ok.... going to shut up about it now.... but it bothers me....because Bobby wasn't saying what Wigington implied he was....


John..... what do you think...?

Thanks for posting about geoengineering ....I just started to feel uncomfortable about Wigington because of the Bobby Kennedy thing....

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by jaybee (here)
...

I respect Jim Lee WAY more than Dane Wigington for multiple reasons, and BOTH have flaws ... I had multiple direct contact with both in the past (late 2000s/early 2010s) ... and I noticed both do not want to listen to any form of clarifications/nuances ... I interviewed Jim and Dane for my "Untold Mysteries" Live Radio show separately, way back ... And was attacked by both side's FAN BASE! ... The difference between Jim & Dane ... is ... that Jim at least (as far as I am aware) does not block/censor/ignore etc. as Jim Lee thrives on having debates anytime, anywhere with anyone ... Both accuses each other on multiple fronts, and both fan bases make it worse to the extreme ... I tend to lean more on Jim's take when it comes to accuracy of his accusations, but not from his "followers" clan.

The biggest flaw of Dane Wigington being FULL ON with the Climate Scare Hysteria Agenda ("Global Warming"/Climate Change "Crisis") of the left and uses way to many unchallenged NeoLib/Left MSM sources ad nauseam is WHY I can not stand him anymore, even so, I still respect PART of his long term efforts, but certainly not all of it. So I am used to hearing & seeing his "shadow side" many times and use my own "filter" to only seek THAT what I found useful for my own quest for the truth and the REST of his work I just "let it be" .... Why? ... Because I do not feel the need to be neutral life-long arbiter for them both >>> I COULD, I REALLY DO >>> But no, thank you! ... I studied (NATO) Chemtrails/GeoEngeneering since 1996 onward and have tons of knowledge from my "Asperger Brain Mind" I accumulated between 1996 and 2006 (20 years!) BEFORE Jim Lee started!

Cheers,
John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳

• youtube.com/@ChemTruthers/videos (one of my channels)

[jaybee]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

Posted by jaybee (here)
...

I respect Jim Lee WAY more than Dane Wigington for multiple reasons, and BOTH have flaws ... I had multiple direct contact with both in the past (late 2000s/early 2010s) ... and I noticed both do not want to listen to any form of clarifications/nuances ... I interviewed Jim and Dane for my "Untold Mysteries" Live Radio show separately, way back ... And was attacked by both side's FAN BASE! ... The difference between Jim & Dane ... is ... that Jim at least (as far as I am aware) does not block/censor/ignore etc. as Jim Lee thrives on having debates anytime, anywhere with anyone ... Both accuses each other on multiple fronts, and both fan bases make it worse to the extreme ... I tend to lean more on Jim's take when it comes to accuracy of his accusations, but not for his "followers" clan.

The biggest flaw of Dane Wigington is the is FULL ON with the Climate Scare Hysteria Agenda ("Global Warming"/Climate Change "Crisis") of the left and uses way to many unchallenged NeoLib/Left MSM sources ad nauseam is WHY I can not stand him anymore, even so, I still respect PART of his long term efforts, but certainly not all of it. So I am used to hearing & seeing his "shadow side" many times and use my own "filter" to only seek THAT what I found useful for my own quest for the truth and the REST of his work I just "let it be" .... Why? ... Because I do not feel the need to be neutral life-long arbiter for them both >>> I COULD, I REALLY DO >>> But no, thank you! ... I studied (NATO) Chemtrails/GeoEngeneering since 1996 onward and have tons of knowledge from my "Asperger Brain Mind" I accumulated between 1996 and 2006 (20 years!) BEFORE Jim Lee started!

Cheers,
John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳

Thanks for the reply, John...... I'm new to the people involved in all this and fairly new to looking deeper into geo~engineering (better late than never :-) ) - but you've been involved in it for years so thanks for your input -

I was alerted to Dane Wigington because he twisted what RFK Jr said.... and I was....eh? what?.... then what he said about why his video was still up on Youtube.... but you have given me the answer to that discrepancy....when you said....

The biggest flaw of Dane Wigington is the is FULL ON with the Climate Scare Hysteria Agenda ("Global Warming"/Climate Change "Crisis") of the left and uses way to many unchallenged NeoLib/Left MSM sources ad nauseam is WHY I can not stand him anymore, even so, I still respect PART of his long term efforts, but certainly not all of it.

That says to me he could be involved to basically try and control the narrative....
While taking this leadership position Wigington would need to impart quite a lot of information to gain people's confidence and influence them... so might we say he's a potential Gate Keeper...? supporting the 'Climate Scare Agenda' but steering away from other angles when necessary.....

Your reply has also indirectly answered my question ..... so do 'they' put it in aviation fuel or not...?...and the answer must be...YES.... god help us all..... but yes...as Jim Lee said - and that's why what Kennedy said was glossed over and twisted....

cheers....

[norman]

It doesn't look like it's just one thing, going on.

Sky Whitening probably IS based on the chemical mix of aviation fuel, but something(s) else is going on too.

I've seen with my own eyes otherwise unexplainable parallel flight tracks put into existence over a very short space of time that cannot have been made by a simple and general exploitation of engine exhaust from normal aviation activity.

[jaybee]

Posted by norman (here)
It doesn't look like it's just one thing, going on.

Sky Whitening probably IS based on the chemical mix of aviation fuel, but something(s) else is going on too.

I've seen with my own eyes otherwise unexplainable parallel flight tracks put into existence over a very short space of time that cannot have been made by a simple and general exploitation of engine exhaust from normal aviation activity.

bolded by me above.....

I agree that something(s) else is going on - something added to aviation fuel for certain things and the 'classic' chem trails for other purposes -

[jaybee]

Posted by jaybee (here)

Posted by norman (here)
It doesn't look like it's just one thing, going on.

Sky Whitening probably IS based on the chemical mix of aviation fuel, but something(s) else is going on too.

I've seen with my own eyes otherwise unexplainable parallel flight tracks put into existence over a very short space of time that cannot have been made by a simple and general exploitation of engine exhaust from normal aviation activity.

bolded by me above.....

I agree that something(s) else is going on - something added to aviation fuel for certain things and the 'classic' chem trails for other purposes -

To clarify for anyone reading the last couple of posts - in the Jim Lee interview on the other thread - HERE.... he didn't mean that the what~ever~it~is that's put in Aviation fuel was the whole story..... just one aspect of the whole sorry business.... and Bobby Kennedy wasn't saying it was the whole story either -

The thing about 'something' being added to aviation fuel is that the evidence would be easier to get hold of maybe..? Much easier than getting hold of the cannisters used for cloud making? (etc) 'chem trails'...... ?

I remember when Julian Assange was cut off from the internet - the last time he was allowed on before his arrest and incarceration - and he was actually speaking about 'intelligent, evil dust' at the time - 'scattered everywhere like confetti' and in everything - connected to the Internet Of Things....imagine the 'spooks' monitoring him - they must have screamed CUT - CUT - not knowing what he was going to say next.... maybe he might have being going to mention aviation fuel - - - ?

SPECULATION.....zillions and zillions and zillions +++ of nano particles - invisible to the naked eye could be one of the possible things added to the jet and plane fuel... ?.... it would certainly spread 'intelligent, evil dust' far and wide - much more widely that the highly visible chem trails....

At it's most extreme this whole thing (in conjunction with 5G, the jabs) could be about literally redesigning Life on Earth....not just the human race...the whole darn lot... just a thought - not a very nice thought -

When I was looking for the Assange clip I came across this and it starts with Assange speaking about 'intelligent, evil dust' then there's the clip with John Brennan ex CIA chief talking enthusiastically about Stratospheric Aerosol Injection.... (hmmm) then it goes on to shots of the sky in Poland - the IOT (Internet of Things) is mentioned in the title - but as I said - IF they could spread the nano 'dust' in the aviation fuel it would be much more effective and invisible...

end of speculation regarding a connection with the IOT

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Julian Assange intelligent EVIL DUST small devices IOT Chemtrails in Poland (5:18)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=hUB2A-uvQNg

start - (19 secs) - Julian Assange talking about intelligent, evil dust... VERY small electronic circuits...

1:38 - John Brennan speaking about Stratospheric Aerosol Injection -

2:18 - 'chem trails' in Poland - and this is like what was happening in the skies above the Midlands in the UK the other day...

[norman]

I think I need to be clear that I don't post this (and other material elsewhere) as a statement of support for anyone's full package of prejudices and priorities. I glean snippets of interest from all sorts of people. I learn tiny little details I did not previously know and reexamine my own working assumptions accordingly.

If we label as foe all people we detect imperfections in . . . . . . we're probably doing the same thing as when truly evil plots are hidden inside a cloud of bogus conspiracy chatter of the cointelpro variety.

Jane Ruby is very bipolar in how she picks her heroes and villains. It drags like a ball and chain though and probably prevents a majority of viewers from noticing the little things she's very astute about, in her own right. She probably just needs a regular hug

Dr. Jane Ruby
LIARS VS TRUTH TELLERS - THE DECEPTION IS ON

https://rumble.com/v6stqjl-liars-vs-...html?start=404


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v6qmuar/?pub=4&start=404

[jaybee]

Posted by norman (here)
I think I need to be clear that I don't post this (and other material elsewhere) as a statement of support for anyone's full package of prejudices and priorities. I glean snippets of interest from all sorts of people. I learn tiny little details I did not previously know and reexamine my own working assumptions accordingly.

If we label as foe all people we detect imperfections in . . . . . . we're probably doing the same thing as when truly evil plots are hidden inside a cloud of bogus conspiracy chatter of the cointelpro variety.

Jane Ruby is very bipolar in how she picks her heroes and villains. It drags like a ball and chain though and probably prevents a majority of viewers from noticing the little things she's very astute about, in her own right. She probably just needs a regular hug

Dr. Jane Ruby
LIARS VS TRUTH TELLERS - THE DECEPTION IS ON

https://rumble.com/v6stqjl-liars-vs-...html?start=404


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v6qmuar/?pub=4&start=404

O......M......G

Re, the bit I bolded above..... 'Oh perish the thought'

I wouldn't dream of casting aspersions on a very inebriated Jane Ruby and her car crash video.... she had a cup with a heart on it and I heard some wind chimes.... so she must be ok ...

Seriously though.... that video was so on topic re the last little batch of posts it was great..... thanks .....

Suffice to say...... obviously there's a 'secret ingredient' in the aviation fuel..... now 100% confirmed....lol

[ExomatrixTV]

• Sun Dimming Dangers:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=MQe17fBe7c4

Solar radiation modification: NOAA State of the Science factsheet:

• climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/solar-radiation-modification-noaa-state-science-factsheet#:~:text=Highlights,sunlight%20away%20from%20the%20Earth

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Part of the United States Department of Commerce, headquartered in Silver Spring, Maryland.

SRM deployments large enough to temporarily offset climate change impacts could have substantial risks and unintended and unexpected consequences.

NOAA is one of the lead federal research agencies investigating the Earth system, including the planet’s radiative balance, the global carbon cycle, and the chemistry and composition of the atmosphere.

Side effects of SRM are driven by

Complex chemical, radiative, and dynamical interactions,

such as changes to the hydrologic cycle and clouds,

or effects on ecosystems,

agricultural production,

• csl.noaa.gov/assessments/ozone/2022/downloads/Chapter6_2022OzoneAssessment.pdf

Impacts on the protective stratospheric ozone layer

Stratospheric aerosol injection, impacts stratospheric ozone

Either by direct injection or by injection of a precursor gas (such as sulfur dioxide, SO2) that would subsequently react in the stratosphere to form aerosols.

SO3 + H2O – H2SO4

More likely in the presence of O3 (ozone)

Proposed aerosol types include sulfate, calcium carbonate, and diamond dust.

The ozone layer is a region in the Earth's stratosphere that contains a high concentration of ozone (O₃) and plays a crucial role in absorbing most of the Sun's harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation.

Marine cloud brightening, alterations to the El Niño Southern Oscillation

• climate.gov/enso

These changes in the seasonal climate of the world's biggest ocean have a cascade of global side effects.

Potential risks to human health and well-being,

and to ecosystems

Green House Gas induced warming and Solar Radiation Management induced cooling are different physical mechanisms;

therefore, SRM would not simply undo GHG-induced warming

and cannot reverse all climate changes everywhere.

Some regions could experience cooler or wetter conditions, and others warmer or drier conditions, compared to a climate without SRM.

In addition, ocean acidification will persist unabated if GHG emissions continue.

SRM deployments large enough to temporarily offset climate change impacts could have substantial risks and unintended and unexpected consequences.

Aerosols are removed from the atmosphere by natural processes on timescales of a few years in the stratosphere.

Legal and societal issues

SRM deployment could also add significant geopolitical risks.

This uneven distribution of benefits and negative consequences introduces potentially significant justice and geopolitical concerns.

Substantial knowledge gaps and uncertainties exist in many critical areas of SRM research, particularly related to the social sciences.

Many of the processes most important for understanding SRM approaches—such as those that control the formation of clouds and aerosols—are among the most uncertain components of the climate system.

These methods have the potential to lower surface temperatures more quickly than carbon dioxide removal (CDR) methods … while posing other risks still to be understood.