9/11: Truth Still Matters, Over 20 Years Later

[jaybee]

*
*

On the subject of Building 7 - in the Judy Wood presentation post 134 above (thanks Delight - I saw it years ago but gave it another viewing earlier) ..... she makes a remark about Building 7 slowly dustifying for hours before it was brought down by a controlled demolition... I think that was the word she used - and I have always thought that Building 7 must have been seriously damaged by whatever happened to the Twin Towers - but didn't 'come down' / disappear in the same way - - - - probably because it wasn't the prime target but was affected by being in close proximity..... by the process that dustified the WTCs...

Plasma spheres have been in the (alternative) news again with the statement that the US government/military can manipulate time and space....and a revival of the MH370 disappearing incident....

In this first video - @ 13 seconds you can see 'something' like a bright sphere 'going onto' the penthouse on top of the building as it collapses - at the point it collapses in..... slow the whole thing down by tapping on pause to see it better -

(54 seconds long)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=XrnmbUDeHus

most if not all videos that remain of the Building 7 collapse don't use the first penthouse collapse part - which is a clue in itself...because the bright 'something' is clear... albeit short lived...


the video below doesn't show the penthouse part but - using the quarter speed bit @ 1:20 there is a brightish sphere? on the opposite corner to the penthouse.... on our left as we look at it.... then as the building is sinking down
@1:26 - 1:27 what looks like another sphere appears on the other corner (our right as we look at it) again tapping on pause you can see it better - I'm speculating these 'spheres/blobs' could be part of the process that brought Building 7 so neatly down -


I wouldn't like to say if it's the same process that was used on the Towers or not - it might be or it might have been an experiment using a different process....(?)..... don't know how much debris was left of Building 7 - and if it was thoroughly dustified as well......


Building 7 Collapse as seen from the west (2:04)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=edowrAzWQBo

edit to add..... it's best to watch the 2nd video above time stamps, on the YT site because the writing doesn't get in the way there...

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/drawandstrike/status/1914413986424013216

Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit
@drawandstrike
·
31m
THE TRUTH

ABOUT 9/11

WILL NOT BE

FOR EVERYONE.

Some will NOT be able to handle it.

Some will NOT be able to bring themselves to question the official fake narrative.

The implications are simply TOO INCREDIBLE FOR THEM TO CONTEMPLATE.

This is how the 9/11 conspiracy to hide what they really did that day has managed to last over 24 years to this point.

They COUNT on too many people NOT being able to break the programming.

But they didn't count on THE GREAT AWAKENING!

Quote
TheStormHasArrived
@TheStormRedux
·
1h
Senator Ron Johnson talking about Building 7 being a controlled demolition 🤯

9/11 was an inside job!

[jaybee]

*
*


For anyone who missed this clip 11 years ago....

John Kerry saying Building 7 was brought down in a 'controlled fashion...'
@50 seconds...



JOHN KERRY ADMITS WTC 7 WAS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION (1:04)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=iHKgMssSIEk

[ExomatrixTV]

Senator Ron Johnson drops BOMBSHELL:

Tells us that 9/11 Hearings are being planned, Building 7 was potentially a "Controlled Demolition"

“Structural Engineers say that thing didn't come down in any other way than controlled demolition. Molten steel. Destruction of evidence. We want answers. What really happened on 9/11? It’s being covered up by our government..."

source

• dutch 🇳🇱 (+ Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳

[mountain_jim]

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...s-says-my-eyes

Building 7 Controlled Demolition?': Republican Senator Plans Shock 9/11 Hearings, Says 'My Eyes Have Been Opened'

by Tyler Durden
Tuesday, Apr 22, 2025 - 03:20 PM

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) is raising eyebrows after revealing on Benny Johnson’s conservative podcast that he’s pushing for a congressional hearing to examine the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the Twin Towers.

Johnson, who serves on the the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, raised questions about the World Trade Center Building 7’s collapse, saying the documentary film, Calling Out Bravo 7 has sparked “an awful lot of questions.”

https://x.com/bennyjohnson/status/1914372377112179056

“Well, start with Building 7,” Sen. Johnson told Johnson. “Again, I don’t know if you can find structural engineers other than the ones that have the corrupt investigations like NIST that would say that that thing didn’t come down in any other way than a controlled demolition.”

“Who ordered the removal and the destruction of all that evidence? Totally contrary to any other firefighting investigation procedures. I mean, who ordered that? Who is in charge? I think there’s some basic information. Where’s all the documentation from the NIST investigation?” the Wisconsin lawmaker continued.

“Now, there are a host of questions that I want and I will be asking, quite honestly, now that my eyes have been opened up,” he added.

https://x.com/The_Real_Fly/status/1701269155339530475

Johnson said he plans to work with former Rep. Curt Weldon (R-PA), who recently appeared on Tucker Carlson’s podcast to discuss 9/11, “to expose what he’s willing to expose.”

https://x.com/TCNetwork/status/1912226670209016135

The senator’s comments prompted Johnson to ask: “So we may actually see hearings about this?”

“I think so,” the senator replied while referencing previous efforts to obtain unredacted FBI files on behalf of 9/11 families.

“We want to get those answers, those documents for the families,” the lawmaker replied. “Hopefully, now with this administration, we can find out what is being covered up.”

Sen. Johnson expressed optimism that the Trump administration will authorize the release of 9/11-related documents, despite prior unsuccessful efforts to declassify them.

“We want those made available in terms of what happened. What did the FBI know that happened? So we had engaged with that. It was on a bipartisan basis. We wanted to get those answers, those documents for the families,” Sen. Johnson said. “Again, we didn’t get squat from the FBI. So hopefully now with this administration, I think President Trump should have some interests being a New Yorker himself.”

“What actually happened in 9/11? What do we know? What is being covered up? My guess is there’s an awful lot being covered up in terms of what the American government knows about 9/11,” he added.

Very interesting to say the least...


https://x.com/joshbottweet/status/1914527580214190204

[Rizotto]

Someone just sent me a link to this webpage (from Architects & Engineers for 9-11 Truth website). It's about a documentary released in 2020 regarding a firefighter's perspective on the collapse of building 7.

‘Calling Out Bravo-7’: a firefighter’s perspective on Building 7
https://www.ae911truth.org/news/1028...-on-building-7

However, I'm unable to find a link to the documentary itself in the above webpage.

This is what I found with an internet search:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=WTKyyzxbBCI

[ExomatrixTV]

• Sen. Ron Johnson Reveals the Lies About 9/11 and Building 7:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=yciAO5lMtVI

• tuckercarlson.com/ron-johnson-highlight-2

[Rizotto]

James Corbett interviews Ted Walter regarding the "9/11 Timeline" database compiled by the International Centre for 9/11 Justice.
Suggestion for PA admins: this database is a great resource for researchers, could it be placed into the PA library?

"The 9/11 Timeline is back! As dedicated researchers will know, the Complete 9/11 Timeline was an invaluable repository of 9/11-related information that became inaccessible several years ago. But now it's back, thanks to the International Center for 9/11 Justice. Joining us today is IC911 Executive Director Ted Walter to talk about the 9/11 timeline, demonstrate how to use it, and inform people how they can support 9/11 truth by spreading the word about this important research tool."

The 9/11 Timeline

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=OkIPG-rhJ4M

Link to "the 9/11 Timeline":
https://ic911.org/complete-911-timeline/

[Tintin]

Posted by Rizotto (here)
James Corbett interviews Ted Walter regarding the "9/11 Timeline" database compiled by the International Centre for 9/11 Justice.
Suggestion for PA admins: this database is a great resource for researchers, could it be placed into the PA library?

Thanks

A nice idea but not terribly practical, or actually doable really short of accessing each and every link, PDF-ing each separate page/s, and just much too much of a time-tied exercise: there's hundreds of links if not thousands there.

For now I'd suggest anyone interested in that resource simply use the link provided.

https://ic911.org/complete-911-timeline/

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Old clips, but lest we forget: unexplained explosions unrelated to the two plane strikes.

Important testimony from boots-on-the-ground eyewitnesses:

https://x.com/RichardGage_911/status...61469981839670

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

A new film is about to drop, called Codex 9/11. General release is coming August 23rd, hosted by Badlands Media on Rumble. One to look out for.

https://x.com/RedPill78/status/1957487068705333596
Zak Paine
@RedPill78
I just want to congratulate @Brad_CGZ
on this incredible film #CODEX911 is truly a masterpiece and worthy of everyone’s attention. The long wait was well worth it and I encourage everyone to share WIDELY when it’s released 8/23/25

[Kryztian]

This looks promising.

Just wondering, it there one good overview film on the whole 9/11 truth phenomena that encompasses all the main criticism of the "official story" in about 60 minutes or so? The last one I saw was "Loose Change" but I think the last version of it "Loose Change: Final Cut" (2007) is now 18 years old. There has been so much more research and more revelations since then and there are many good films which cover in detail various aspects of 9/11, but we really need on good film that is 60 to 90 minutes long to explain to those who have yet to understand, what is really wrong with the official story.

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
A new film is about to drop, called Codex 9/11. General release is coming August 23rd, hosted by Badlands Media on Rumble. One to look out for.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

It would be a tall order to cover the entirety of the 9/11 attacks in just 60 minutes. Though now dated, the best film I know is September 11 - The New Pearl Harbour. It's about as comprehensive as it gets. Thoroughly recommended. The running time however is 4hrs 52 minutes.

Available here in the Avalon Library:

[norman]

I lean quite heavily in the direction of "no planes" these days, so I jumped on this podcast interview with an enthusiasm I doubt is shared around here, much.

I've previously stated in this thread why I cannot believe real planes sliced through those steel buildings in the way our TV screens showed us. Mark Conlon brings more reasons to think the planes they say hit the buildings didn't/couldn't have done so.

I have another line of thinking development that ties fantom/holographic planes with the ufology scene in a way that I also don't expect to be well received around here too, but that's another post for another time. Suffice to say, Werner Von Braun told his best buddy their final card would be a fake alien invasion. It seems increasingly likely, to me, that they already have the technology ( and the systemic corruption ) to actually do that as convincingly, or better, than how they pulled off the 9/11 stunt.

back to topic.

UK Column,Jerm - Mark Conlon on whether planes actually hit the Twin Towers
1 hour 24 minutes - Posted Aug 21, 2025

Show notes
Jerm and Mark Conlon dive into the intricate details surrounding the events of 9/11, with a sharp focus on the planes involved (or, rather, allegedly involved).

They trace the growth of scepticism towards the official narrative, underscoring the pivotal role of 9/11 in shaping public consciousness, and scrutinise anomalies in flight data and eyewitness accounts.

Mark presents his research on the 'no planes' theory, probing the role of technology and obvious cover-ups.

Their discussion also covers the physics of the impacts, the significance of military exercises on that day, and peculiarities in passenger manifests, urging listeners to question accepted narratives and consider the deeper implications of 9/11.

Bio: Mark is a researcher and author known for his critical analysis of the 9/11 events, particularly focusing on the anomalies surrounding the alleged plane crashes.

Website: https://911planesresearch.substack.com


https://odysee.com/@ukcolumn:9/Mark-Conlon:c?t=38

Source: https://odysee.com/$/embed/@ukcolumn:9/Mark-Conlon:c?t=38

[Johnnycomelately]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
It would be a tall order to cover the entirety of the 9/11 attacks in just 60 minutes. Though now dated, the best film I know is September 11 - The New Pearl Harbour. It's about as comprehensive as it gets. Thoroughly recommended. The running time however is 4hrs 52 minutes.

Available here in the Avalon Library:

Cool vid, Mark, thanks. Have been on my third and final bite, credits just rolled.

I’ve watched plenty of vids on this topic, still have most of them in a bookmark dungeon, and I would call this vid exceptional in the factors it considers. Lots of new ideas and a bunch of new footage. I especially liked the new interviews of regular people about explosions, and a few new of uniformed witnesses. And best Building 7 attention/description/explanation ever.

Would you please post the source of this vid, and some info like when OP’d, actually anything that could convince us that AI didn’t contribute some riffs here? Because it seems, like they say, too good to be true. And it didn’t broach the paradigm of spray-on gel-nanothermite, including evidence of that in collected samples of the copious dust, so that seems sketchy.

Could you, or anyone else too, run this through an AI-detector filter/detector?

[Rizotto]

Not sure if the site named "Top Documentaries" has previously been mentioned on PA. They have several categories of free documentaries.

It has a list of over 20 documentaries in its 9/11 category. I've seen many of them, most are excellent and provide information from various angles.

Here's the link: https://topdocumentaryfilms.com/category/911/

[Rizotto]

One of the best (in my opinion) documentary is "The Elephant in the Room". It has interviews of many folks more or less directly involved in 9/11. Particularly interesting, is Cynthia McKinney, and many others, etc. Also several first responders at ground zero who describe what they observed that fateful day.

For example, at 1:24:00 in the video, the first responder's describing what he heard during the few moments just prior the collapse of Building 7.

There's a certain poignancy in listening to their hoarse voices, speaking from injured lungs, knowing that by now they have probably succumbed to lung disease.

THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=1Q3DU8-pV9E

[Tintin]

Posted by Johnnycomelately (here)

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
It would be a tall order to cover the entirety of the 9/11 attacks in just 60 minutes. Though now dated, the best film I know is September 11 - The New Pearl Harbour. It's about as comprehensive as it gets. Thoroughly recommended. The running time however is 4hrs 52 minutes.

Available here in the Avalon Library:

Cool vid, Mark, thanks. Have been on my third and final bite, credits just rolled.

I’ve watched plenty of vids on this topic, still have most of them in a bookmark dungeon, and I would call this vid exceptional in the factors it considers. Lots of new ideas and a bunch of new footage. I especially liked the new interviews of regular people about explosions, and a few new of uniformed witnesses. And best Building 7 attention/description/explanation ever.

Would you please post the source of this vid, and some info like when OP’d, actually anything that could convince us that AI didn’t contribute some riffs here? Because it seems, like they say, too good to be true. And it didn’t broach the paradigm of spray-on gel-nanothermite, including evidence of that in collected samples of the copious dust, so that seems sketchy.

Could you, or anyone else too, run this through an AI-detector filter/detector?

No need for an AI filter employment here. I posted this to the library back last May and it's, as far as I can tell, fully the original film from 2013.

[Russian Bear]

"Loose Change" 2006 https://yandex.ru/video/preview/7824457715784741863

[ExomatrixTV]

• Senator Ron Johnson Dares to Question 9/11:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=fBfFuZ0kWBI

Senator Ron Johnson joins us today to discuss the official 9/11 conspiracy theory and the legitimate questions that he and many other Americans have about that story. We discuss Senator Johnson's problems with the official 9/11 investigation, whether the Senate can and should hold new hearings on the subject, and what he will be discussing at the upcoming Turning the Tide: 9/11 Justice in 2025 conference in Washington, D.C. We also delve into harm caused by the experimental mRNA injections and the subsequent erosion of public trust in government and institutions.

• corbettreport.com/senator-ron-johnson-dares-to-question-9-11

• Turning the Tide on 9/11 with Curt Weldon:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=8RfB6C38PsA

Congressman Curt Weldon appears on The Corbett Report to discuss his appearance at the upcoming Turning the Tide: 9/11 Justice in 2025 conference in Washington, D.C. James and Congressman Weldon discuss 9/11, Able Danger, Osama Bin Laden, intelligence operations and where they agree and where they disagree on the subject of 9/11 truth.

• corbettreport.com/turning-the-tide%E2%80%A6with-curt-weldon