Nanotechnology

[John Hilton]

I did a search and couldn't find a discussion specifically about nanotechnology. I would like opinions about the following discussion. My friend sent me the following email:

(EDIT. Dr. Ana Mihalcea appears to be a reputable scientist but I'd never heard of her.)

You may not want to read anything about nanoparticles in the bloodstream "because you an engineer" and know that it is impossible, but MIT, Harvard, and Chinese military are extremely interested in the subject, as you will read below:

A preface with a quote about nanotech: "June 30, 2025: Nanotechnology is no longer science fiction - it's woven into the fabric of our daily lives. At its core, nanotech means manipulating materials at the atomic level and molecular scale. These nanostructures and biosynthetic organisms are so small they can penetrate cells, cross biological barriers, destroy entire biological systems, and rewrite our DNA. Nanotechnology is now found in vaccines, drug delivery systems, cancer treatments, our food supply, electronic wearables, and increasingly integrated into a biodigital surveillance systems.

This is not speculation - it's openly discussed in defense, biotech, and political arenas." (Karen Kingston's latest Substack article)

This is how Jeff B. introduces the video cited in the next paragraph: "... the ticking time bomb in your body - EVEN IF YOU DIDN'T GET THE CLOT SHOT! I know this because last week I visited Dr. Ana Milhacea at her medical practice in Yelm, Washington. I have been on a mission to cleanse my mind and body for years, almost since the start of the Covaids scamdemic, and am currently in probably the best physical and mental state I have ever been. Metabolically, my body is that of a 33-year-old.

When she asked to test my blood for nanobots, I didn't hesitate; I didn't get the lethal injection, so I know I'm fine. Much to my surprise, it turns out that under a microscope my blood indisputably shows clots of nanoparticles, or in Ana's words… micro robots.

In today's interview we sat down to discuss HOW this could happen (shedding, microplastics in just about everything), WHY (total control of humanity through mind control), and WHAT exactly it is:

Lipid nanoparticles (can cross blood-brain barrier)

Graphene oxide (electro-reactive and conductive)

Microplastic particles detected in some vials by independent labs

Possible self-assembling nanostructures reported by whistleblowers

In fact, MIT, Harvard, and Chinese military research all point to self-assembling nanostructures that activate under heat or electromagnetic stimulation. Translation?

Tiny metallic strands - invisible to the eye - can form circuits in the body. We're talking about bio-electric scaffolding that builds itself, then waits for a signal. They call it "smart material." Suddenly, the body becomes a biosynthetic platform - able to receive, process, and respond to signals.

Ana explains how she and her team of fellow scientists compared vaxxed v unvaxxed blood, only to find the same rubbery clots and filaments and same chemical signature in both. The ONLY difference they could find was that vaccinated blood is extra sensitive to 4 hertz (Hz) extra low frequency (ELF) waves &emdash; a frequency in sync with the brain's natural theta wave range, which governs deep sleep, dreaming, and subconscious programming."

A conversation between Jeff Berwick and Ryan Veli is one of the best that I have seen in long time:

"The Super Artificial Intelligence and Nanotech Complete Subjugation of Humanity Is Here" - https://rumble.com/v6vhn39-the-super...n-of-huma.html

-- min. 8, 25:15- Ryan's website: https://ryanveli.com. Ryan details the long term plan for a complete and total takeover of the Earth and humanity via Super Artificial Intelligence and Nanotech that has already been implanted into almost everything on Earth via chemtrails, vaccines and the food system.

Here is the interview where Jeff goes to a doctor who puts Jeff's blood under a microscope and describes what she saw in Jeff's blood: "THE TECHNOCRATIC TRANSHUMANIST AGENDA: Interview with Nanotech Whistleblower, Dr. Ana Mihalcea" -

https://rumble.com/v6vasov-the-techn...lds-leadi.html - starting after 15 min.

Please give this some of your attention and tell me what you think! It puts a whole other spin on the vax, on chemtrails etc.
__

I replied as follows (before watching the videos):-

Nanotechnology is certainly possible and, indeed, is under development in various laboratories. However, I have not seen any evidence that the particles being found in the bloodstream are "self-assembling nanobots". They appear to be contamination from badly manufactured "vaccines" and from plastic particles that are now ubiquitous - from bottles, PTFE-coated pans and utensils, and from atmospheric pollution that we breathe every day from vehicle and factory exhausts.

Chemtrail analysis shows mostly components of fly ash, including aluminium, strontium and barium "heavy metals". It has been suggested that other elements could also be sprayed and I wouldn't dispute this possibility, but I'd like to see the analytical proof, rather than simply hearsay.

Most people have been exposed either to the experimental "vaccine" or to people shedding it, or to the "Covid" virus itself - often without symptoms. The virus and the "vaccine" both cause clotting and accumulation of various cells to form clots. But I wouldn't class these as "self-assembling" any more than a normally coagulating blood clot is "self-assembling".

There are various pills and capsules that you can take to minimise clotting - I take them myself and I have listed them for you at least once (see attachment).

In short, I see no evidence of any intelligence in the "self-assembling" debris in blood, nor any possibility of electrical connections or a power source. In addition, these supposed "nanobots" would be so small as to make any integral antenna resonate at terahertz frequencies, making control by radio frequencies challenging. Of course there's a possibility of control by a magnetic field or by light frequencies but I feel that we are now into the realm of science fiction. But don't discard your tin hat just yet. In theory, it's probably the best defence, although you'd have to wrap it around your body.

__

My friend was upset by my response and answered thus:-

Did you watch Jeff's talk with Dr. Anna and listen to her explain what she just observed? Are you calling her a liar? Why don't you get in touch with Dr. Anna and Ryan Veli and clear up the misunderstanding? Until you do the actual research and listen to these guys, you are just spouting off like a child who refuses to believe his parents trying to alert him about something important. These guys are a helluva lot more qualified than you or me.

And how do you deal with the report that "MIT, Harvard, and Chinese military research all point to self-assembling nanostructures that activate under heat or electromagnetic stimulation." ??? Do you think that references to MIT and Harvard mean nothing? These universities have been consistently rated higher than Cambridge and Oxford for decades! And usually they are rated among thee top 3 worldwide.

Are you in total denial of the real world? If so, just unplug your Internet and do not talk to anyone ever again.

__

The videos mention several things apart from nanotechnology: for example mind control and I'm already aware that this is possible without the use of nanotech. I'm not disputing these. What I'm disputing, specifically, is that we all have self-replicating nanobots in our blood.

Can anybody comment, with evidence?

Thanks.

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by John Hilton (here)
I did a search and couldn't find a discussion specifically about nanotechnology.

• Nanotechnology: The Big Mammoth in the Room!
• Transhumanism Upgrade - Wireless Body Area Network - Internet of Bodies & Behaviour (deeper nanotech connection!).
• ProjectAvalon.net/forum4/tags.php?tag=Nanotechnology

I wonder, how much of the (bio)nanotech, is activated/triggered/powered up/boosted via mmWaves and/or pulsed microwaves 4G/5G most of us are increasingly SATURATED with it from multiple angles and it only gets worse, even from space! ... or what about possible terahertz waves waves being used (6G).

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[onawah]

I've posted about Dr. Ana's work repeatedly here on the forum for quite a while now on various threads, with links to her substack page:
https://substack.com/@anamihalceamdphd
and that of her research colleagues at Humanity United Now:
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/

They are all reputable researchers, and have published innumerable findings about the self-replicating nanotech being found in the blood of the vaxxed and the unvaxxed both.
They include MANY microscopy videos showing all the strange things they are finding, many of them moving around, blinking, shining, and replicating right before our eyes.
And there is evidence they are being distributed via chemtrails and being found in air, food, water and other pharmaceuticals as well.
There can be no doubt that these things exist and they are doing a lot of harm.
It's great that we have an Avalon member who has actually been to see Dr. Ana, bringing that info even more to the front.
Thanks so much for sharing that, John Hilton!

[Sunny]

John, I think people do need to be aware of this topic.

But as someone who has followed virtually everyone writing about these things, once you have made up your mind about whether it is true or not, it can start to be not a useful discussion.

Many people are looking at substances under the microscope -- blood, tap water, pharmaceuticals, etc., etc. -- and finding strange structures. They are posting videos of these materials self-assembling. Some interesting researchers on Substack are Dr. David Nixon (Nixonlab), Karl C. (Man Against the Microbes), Silvia Netziger (SAM's Substack), Freedom Warrior Woman (Un-Hackable Animal) -- and of course Dr. Ana Mihalcea is one, although she is not posting currently.

Once you have seen some of these photos and videos and it seems clear that this kind of thing is there (as when your friend agreed that it is in his blood), most of these researchers do not go any further. That's when it stops being useful, because it is not a big enough picture to simply believe (or not believe) there is nanotechnology and maybe you should try to detox it if you have it.

There is a bigger picture that this topic fits into -- the Internet of Bodies, the Internet of Things. The WEF. 5G and 6G. Giving every being on earth its own barcode. Xfinity (a cable provider) has just announced it will give free motion sensing to its clients (i.e, AI can tell where someone is moving in your house -- are you in the kitchen, by the computer, in the bathroom?) It may be useful if your mother has Alzheimers and you want to know if she is OK. But it can also can be used to locate someone and assassinate them, like in the Middle East.

I think some of the people with a bigger picture are Celeste Solum, Karen Kingston and Sabrina Wallace.

Karen's talent is finding technology patents and publishingr them on her Substack. (e.g., Don't believe in weather technology? Then why are there so many patents for it?)

Something Karen said recently seems interesting to me. She has suggested that what is called "shedding" from vaccines could have been caused if self-amplifying mRNA was used in the Covid vaccines. sa-mRNA is just being rolled out now. But what if that explains why there is "shedding"?

Celeste and Sabrina are not on Substack, but they have videos on Rumble. Their videos are similar in some ways. They get on the internet and show you actually existing websites from universities, companies and the military about their work with remote monitoring of humans, medical tracking, (e.g., your "digital twin" who transmits your tempature, blood pressure, etc. remotely to your doctor), and other topics.

I tested this just now by searching for "body area network" on Duckduckgo. Sure enough, I got a whole page of links, incuding an entry in Wikipedia.


What I am trying to say is, if this thread is about, "Is there is evidence for nanotechnology?", I think it has the possibility to take something with a lot of evidence, if you know where to look, and making it into an intellectual exercise that never comes to a conclusion.

I am sorry for not posting any links and videos. I need some time to find some interesting ones and will post them later.

[onawah]

There is plenty of evidence too from many embalmers finding huge, weird blood clots in innumerable corpses that were never present before.
What Dr. Ana and Humanity United Now have reported is that the nanotech they see in people's blood is parasitizing blood cells, drawing the life force from them which they use to replicate.
So presumably what is left of those cells is forming the clots.

Here's just one example from today in which there is testimony regarding official acknowledgement from the US State Funeral Director Association that these clots are indeed real and they're prevalent.

Embalmers Report Persistent Blood Clots in Corpses Since COVID Vaxx Roll Out
The Jimmy Dore Show
1.57M subscriber
Jul 2, 2025

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=sE_V9B4AzQc

[Sunny]

Let me try here to embed something that shows nanotechnology research. It is a video of Dr. David Nixon and Karl Corona with Maria Zeee that was recorded in 2024.

These guys, and others, have published hundreds of articles on this topic on Substack, some with great detail referencing biology, chemistry and even physics. At least this video will give an idea of what they are looking at and considering.

Their consideration at present is that the structures they are seeing are becoming more and more complex. They also think they may be seeing the formation of synthetic blood, where natural blood cells are being replaced by artificial structures.

Here is the link to this Rumble video: https://rumble.com/v4syq28-dr.-david...s%2Csrc_v1_s_m

Here is the video embedded: (I hope. I am getting a message that Rumble does not like embedded videos.)


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/[url]https://rumble.com/embed/v4qgvge/?pub=4[/url]

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v4qgvge

[Sunny]

Here is an article from SAM's Substack from December 2023 with a video of black rectangular substances forming in the blood: https://sam368.substack.com/p/histor...ting-structure.

I think you can access non-paying Substack articles freely. If they ask you to subscribe just click "Continue without paying."

Here is part of an article by Karen Kingston, written April 23, 2025:

Is Optogenetics Changing What it Means to "Be Human"?

Optogenetics is the field of synthetic biology that uses light and bioelectronic nanoparticle devices to manipulate and control cellular functions inside the human body, via a wireless and traceless manner.
How optogenetics affects gene and nerve expression inside cells inside the human body.
• Opotogenetics controls gene expression and protein production inside the cells of organs and tissues.
o Controlling gene expression includes reprogramming human cells within the human body to produce genetic proteins foreign and toxic to the human species.
 These foreign ‘genetic proteins’ are designed from non-human DNA and are sometimes referred to as ‘viruses.’
o With optogenetics light can be used to force human cells to produce disease-causing viruses (i.e. spike proteins), as well as bacteria and/or other disease-causing, parasite-like molecules and particles.
• Optogenetics can also manipulate nerve cell expression and activity inside the human brain.
o This means that light can be used to radically change a person’s emotional state (calm or angry), sensory state (numbness or pain, thirst or hunger, etc)., and cognitive thoughts and memories.
“Optogenetic control is a form of wireless communication in which the receiver of the wireless signal -the actuator-is fabricated from material encoded with DNA…The activity of the cell can be controlled simply by turning on an external light source.” - Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour

And don't forget that under President Obama the National Nanotechnology Initiative was created:

The NNI Vision and Strategic Plan

The National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) expedites the discovery, development and deployment of nanoscale science and technology to serve the public good through a program of coordinated research and development aligned with the missions of the participating agencies. These agencies work to fulfill the NNI vision by working together to accomplish four primary goals:

To advance world-class nanotechnology research and development;
To foster the transfer of new technologies into products for commercial and public benefit;
To develop and sustain educational resources, a skilled workforce and the supporting infrastructure and tools to advance nanotechnology; and
To support the responsible development of nanotechnology.

The aim of the NNI is to move nanotechnology discoveries from the laboratory into new products for commercial and public benefit, encourage more students and teachers to become involved in nanotechnology education, create a skilled workforce and the supporting infrastructure and tools to advance nanotechnology and to support the responsible development of nanotechnology.


Now, if the taxpayers of the US are funding an initiative for nanotechnology, I think we can lay to rest the question of whether nanotechnology exists. There is information all over the place about nanotechnology. It is a deep rabbit hole, with a lot to look at and discuss. I will post some more things as I come across them. I have been following this kind of information shice the beginning of Covid.

[thirtythree]

Molecular nano-tech pioneer Kim Drexler hypothesized a doomsday scenario where self-replicating nano-bots inhabit and consume all biomass on the planet. He called it Ecophagy

You can look up 'Gray goo theory'.

[John Hilton]

Thanks, all, but I'm an engineer. What I'm looking for is definitive proof in the form of measurement, chemical analyses and electron microscope analyses of the anomalies in blood. The videos that I've seen so far show anomalies but no proof that (e.g.) "that flashing dot is a self assembling nanobot that's designed to control the brain" or similar conjecture. It's all simply opinion.

As for "we are all infected," the following videos of "vaxed" and "unvaxed" blood suggest that we are not all infected:

https://rumble.com/v134m9l-comparing...g-finding.html
https://rumble.com/v6v6t21-comparati...ccination.html

[onawah]

If the anomalies being seen in blood are not nanobots, what are they, in your opinion?

Posted by John Hilton (here)
Thanks, all, but I'm an engineer. What I'm looking for is definitive proof in the form of measurement, chemical analyses and electron microscope analyses of the anomalies in blood. The videos that I've seen so far show anomalies but no proof that (e.g.) "that flashing dot is a self assembling nanobot that's designed to control the brain" or similar conjecture. It's all simply opinion.

As for "we are all infected," the following videos of "vaxed" and "unvaxed" blood suggest that we are not all infected:

https://rumble.com/v134m9l-comparing...g-finding.html
https://rumble.com/v6v6t21-comparati...ccination.html

[Sunny]

Posted by John Hilton (here)
Thanks, all, but I'm an engineer. What I'm looking for is definitive proof in the form of measurement, chemical analyses and electron microscope analyses of the anomalies in blood. The videos that I've seen so far show anomalies but no proof that (e.g.) "that flashing dot is a self assembling nanobot that's designed to control the brain" or similar conjecture. It's all simply opinion.

As for "we are all infected," the following videos of "vaxed" and "unvaxed" blood suggest that we are not all infected:

https://rumble.com/v134m9l-comparing...g-finding.html
https://rumble.com/v6v6t21-comparati...ccination.html

Well, first of all, it wasn't stated anywhere that every person has infected blood. But there is evidence that some vaccinated people, and some unvaccinated people, do have it.

I am taking your objections as a criticism of my posting skills, rather than a lack of available data.

I have read people posting chemical analyses of changes in blood. Clifford Carnicom, Dr. Ana and SAM come to mind. Some people have done analyses of the fibrin clots found by undertakers. After reading a lot of info for years, I have to remember where I saw it. I will try to find and post something.

Re: interpreting self-assembling technology. When you watch some of the videos taken by microscope folks, it sure looks like the components in the video are assembling. Maybe I can find a better example? And people need to create hypotheses to guide their exploration.

[TrumanCash]

Graphene Oxide has been confirmed to be in dental anesthetics. I found this out months after I had been injected with Lidocaine at a dental office. Initially, it felt like tiny sharp particles in my gums where the injection occurred and it felt like they had an electrical charge. This inflammation lasted about ten days.

Later, I detoxed the graphene out of my body while doing a series of saunas using niacin. I have been using niacin in conjunction with saunas for decades so my body is very accustomed to it and I barely get a flush from it even when taking higher doses. This was very different.

The graphene came out of the pores in my skin on my upper back, shoulders and lower neck. It was absolutely excruciating!--So much so that I was screaming at the top of my lungs the first time it came out! Again, it felt like tiny, sharp particles coming out with an electrical charge feeling associated with them.

I continued doing the saunas to make sure they were all out of my body and more came out in three subsequent saunas, each time with less intensity.

It was months later that I found the abstracts online that revealed the research with graphene and dental anesthetics. Lidocaine was one of the anesthetics mentioned in the abstracts. More recently, doctors and scientists actually isolated graphene oxide in dental anesthetics. However, I do not think this phenomenon is just in dental anesthetics; people can get graphene in multiple ways and other medical injections. It's also been found in chemtrails according to Dane Wigington.

[Sunny]

Hi, John,
You are wondering if there are self-assembling nanobots in people's blood, if there is evidence for it. Maybe it is easier to investigate it in a few steps:

1). Is there such a thing as self-assembling nanotechnology?
2). Are self-assembling nanobots making changes to people's blood?
3). If so, is it from nanos in Covid vaccines, or something else?

So let's take a step back and ask, "What is nanotechnology, and can it be used to make self-assembling structures?"

From the US National Nanotechnology Initiative website (nano.gov):

https://www.nano.gov/about-nanotechn...ial-about-nano

“Nanotechnology is the understanding and control of matter at the nanoscale, at dimensions between approximately 1 and 100 nanometers, where unique phenomena enable novel applications. Matter can exhibit unusual physical, chemical, and biological properties at the nanoscale, differing in important ways from the properties of bulk materials, single atoms, and molecules…”

“Scale at which much biology occurs
Over millennia, nature has perfected the art of biology at the nanoscale. Many of the inner workings of cells naturally occur at the nanoscale. For example, hemoglobin, the protein that carries oxygen through the body, is 5.5 nanometers in diameter. A strand of DNA, one of the building blocks of life, is only about 2 nanometers in diameter.
Drawing on the natural nanoscale of biology, many medical researchers are working on designing tools, treatments, and therapies that are more precise and personalized than conventional ones. Nanomedicine formulations can be designed to deliver therapeutics directly to a specific site within the body, which can lower the dose required to achieve therapeutic effect and reduce adverse side effects. Nanomaterials also are being used to develop affordable and easy-to-use diagnostics and monitoring devices for a broad range of applications that includes glucose monitoring, pregnancy tests, and viral detection. Advanced nanomaterials are used to improve chemical, physical, and mechanical performance of prosthetics materials, with benefits that can include better biocompatibility, strength-to-weight ratios, and antimicrobial properties to reduce risk of infection.
Other fields are also benefiting from an understanding of natural nanotechnology. Some scientists are exploring the use of molecular self-assembly, self-organization, and quantum mechanics to create novel computing platforms. Other researchers are using nanomaterials to develop nature-inspired systems for artificial photosynthesis to harness solar energy.”

OK, so far this website says a few interesting things: that “many of the inner workings of cells” occur at the nanoscale level, it describes hemoglobin as "a naturally-occurring nanoscale protein that is found in blood”, and that scientists are working with “molecular self-assembly” in some fields that use nanos, like quantum computing.

On this page, https://www.nano.gov/about-nanotechn...g-at-nanoscale,
it is stated that:

Manufacturing at the nanoscale is known as nanomanufacturing. Nanomanufacturing involves scaled-up, reliable, and cost-effective manufacturing of nanoscale materials, structures, devices, and systems. It also includes research, development, and integration of top-down processes and increasingly complex bottom-up, or self-assembly, processes. Top-down fabrication reduces large pieces of material down to the nanoscale, like someone carving a model airplane out of a block of wood. The bottom-up approach to nanomanufacturing creates products by building them up from atomic- and molecular-scale components. Bottom-up approaches also include certain molecular-scale components that spontaneously “self-assemble” into ordered structures.

So in other words, it is possible in some applications to use “molecular-scale components that spontaneously ‘self-assemble’ into ordered structures.”

It continues on to say: “Self-assembly describes the process in which a group of components come together to form an ordered structure without outside direction.”

OK for now! Next question to look into: is there a site that says explicitly that self-assembly is being used in medical applications?

[Sunny]

Here is some information about the use of nanotechnology in medical research, including references to self-assembling nanotechnology. It is all from one study published on PubMed Central on Spetember 14, 2023.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10536529/
“Emerging Applications of Nanotechnology in Healthcare and Medicine”

The article is an overview of the ways that nanotechnology can be used in medical applications: for instance, for drug delivery, internal monitoring, nano surgical procedures, and also the role it played during Covid-19 in mRNA vaccines. Here are some interesting quotes:

“A few types of nanoparticles that are currently in use for diagnostic purposes include paramagnetic nanoparticles, nanocrystals, quantum dots, nanoshells, and nanosomes [28,29].”

(I thought it was useful to post this short reference to “quantum dots”, as it is one of the things that microscopists claim to see in people’s blood.)

“Scientists are even working on performing wireless intracellular and intranuclear nanoscale surgeries against multiple malignancies and diseases [46,48].”

(Likewise I wanted to include the short reference about using wireless to guide nano surgeries. There is also a very long passage at the end of this article about the use of electrical impulses made by the human body to power nanotechnology inside the body.)

"Marvelous scientific arrangements are being carried out in the form of manufacturing and testing mechanical red blood cell technologies called respirocytes. Nanorobotics share the potential to deliver 200+ times more oxygen to body tissues as compared to natural red blood cells [49,50]. This could make one think about the potential of nanotechnology to be utilized for the diagnosis and treatment of various blood-linked disorders and their cure in the future [50].

(This quote seems to be about putting nanorobots into the blood to augment or replace natural red blood cells.)

“2.3.3. DNA Nanotechnology and Drug Delivery System

DNA-based drug delivery devices have been introduced in the past few years, such as DNA guns and DNA vaccines. Based on similar principles, an emerging field of DNA nanotechnology is being introduced in the nanomedicine industry [51]. These medical tools allow for the self-assembly of nanostructures and molecules that ultimately enhance drug targeting and reduce the toxicity associated with these drugs.
(This is a reference to self-assembling nanostructures.)

“Modern therapeutic concepts including gene therapy and molecular DNA-based therapies are already being practiced in healthcare and the arrival of nanotechnology has forwarded further advances in it [58]. Since the very basis of working gene therapy is at the molecular level of disease prevention and genetic adjustments, nanoscale technology plays a vital role in gene therapy [58].”

(Use of nanotechnology in gene therapies).

“Moreover, polymer-based nanoparticle mixtures are also prepared for intravenous drug injections. These modified technologies are a gateway to further advances in nanogenetic therapies [60].”

(Use of nano-scale polymers. People looking at blood under the microscope have theorized that some of the anomalous structures they are seeing contain polymers.)

[Sunny]

“Polyplex micelles are a type of nano-sized structure that are formed by the self-assembly of cationic polymers with nucleic acids, such as small interfering RNA (siRNA) or plasmid DNA (pDNA) [61]. These polyplex micelles have attracted significant attention for their potential in gene therapy and as drug delivery systems… Polyplex micelles can encapsulate siRNA or pDNA within their core, protecting them from degradation and facilitating their delivery to tumor cells [63,64].”

(Use of self-assembling polymers with RNA and DNA gene therapies.)

“The use of messenger RNA (mRNA)-loaded lipid nanoparticles is limited by their hepatic protein expression…”

(In other words, mRNA, such as found in Covid vaccines, are lipid nanoparticles.)

“In addition, nanotechnology has been used to improve the stability and efficacy of vaccines, as well as develop new delivery methods such as nasal sprays and microneedle patches [149,150]. These approaches can help increase vaccine accessibility and effectiveness, particularly in resource-limited settings. The breakthrough and rapid responses coming from nanomedicine can be ascertained by the fact that nanotechnology is also being utilized for vaccine drug manufacturing technologies against COVID-19 [151]…In this regard nanomaterials, such as quantum dots, are being introduced into biosensors for diagnostics experiments and other nanoassemblies, such as liposomes, polymeric and lipid nanoparticles, metallic nanoparticles, and micelles, which are being utilized for antiviral drug encapsulation and drug conjugation [150,151,152,153].”

(This quote is about the use of nanomaterials in vaccines, and specifically for Covid.)

“The side effects of nanotechnology are of great concern for humans, animals, and the overall environment. While the toxicity attached to these assemblies is poorly understood, the scientific community remains unsure as to what level they can extend the applications of nanotechnology, especially in medicine, which is quite a sensitive domain of healthcare [142].”

(The use of nanotechnology in humans can produce significant side effects.)

John, where do you want to go from here? There is so much information in this one article that I am wondering what else you might need, or whether you think it is possible that nanotechnology from the vaccines could be messing with people’s blood.

[onawah]

The problem with waiting for the kind of evidence that cannot be refuted is that it usually comes too late, and that is perhaps the puppet masters' best way of keeping the public ill-informed, off-balance, and impotent.

[John Hilton]

Posted by onawah (here)
If the anomalies being seen in blood are not nanobots, what are they, in your opinion?

As I wrote in my first post: I have not seen any evidence that the particles being found in the bloodstream are "self-assembling nanobots". They appear to be contamination from badly manufactured "vaccines" and from plastic particles that are now ubiquitous - from bottles, PTFE-coated pans and utensils, and from atmospheric pollution that we breathe every day from vehicle and factory exhausts.

You can dissolve sugar in hot water, leave the water to evaporate and the sugar will "self assemble" into a crystalline lattice. Many chemicals do this. But such formations are not "nanobots".

What I'm asking about specifically is that Dr. Ana Mihalcea states in the video, "There's microchips being built in your blood right now. It's pretty much in everybody."

I'm an electronics engineer so I've worked with microchips for several decades and I see no sign of these in the blood samples shown so far. Even if it were true, I don't believe that "It's pretty much in everybody," without strong evidence.

Has anyone here had their blood examined by an expert? I mean someone who works with microchips designed for biological purposes.

[onawah]

Plastic contaminants don't blink on and off or glow and move around on their accord, or assemble into larger units in formations that are not random, but repeating.
Or respond to technological stimulus like microwaves or certain frequencies in the way that inert matter does.
For anyone who has watched enough of the videos from Dr. Ana and Humanity United Now, your arguments just don't hold up.
There are articles and videos from various insiders showing the work that has been done to create such nanotech, and explanations as to why the puppet masters have had them developed and plan to put them to use.
They aren't eager for the news about all that to get out (though it's getting harder to hide) but it's there if you know where to look.
You might want to ask a Mod to help you find it on the forum--I know I've seen such in various places online and on the forum, but don't remember exactly where.
And I imagine that Humanity United Now would be a good source, if you ask, and having already been in touch with Dr. Ana, it shouldn't be too hard to figure out how to do that.
As for how the nanotech is becoming ubiquitous, I suggest checking out this post for a start: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1659834

Posted by John Hilton (here)

Posted by onawah (here)
If the anomalies being seen in blood are not nanobots, what are they, in your opinion?

As I wrote in my first post: I have not seen any evidence that the particles being found in the bloodstream are "self-assembling nanobots". They appear to be contamination from badly manufactured "vaccines" and from plastic particles that are now ubiquitous - from bottles, PTFE-coated pans and utensils, and from atmospheric pollution that we breathe every day from vehicle and factory exhausts.

You can dissolve sugar in hot water, leave the water to evaporate and the sugar will "self assemble" into a crystalline lattice. Many chemicals do this. But such formations are not "nanobots".

[Sunny]

Posted by John Hilton (here)

Posted by onawah (here)
If the anomalies being seen in blood are not nanobots, what are they, in your opinion?

As I wrote in my first post: I have not seen any evidence that the particles being found in the bloodstream are "self-assembling nanobots". They appear to be contamination from badly manufactured "vaccines" and from plastic particles that are now ubiquitous - from bottles, PTFE-coated pans and utensils, and from atmospheric pollution that we breathe every day from vehicle and factory exhausts.

You can dissolve sugar in hot water, leave the water to evaporate and the sugar will "self assemble" into a crystalline lattice. Many chemicals do this. But such formations are not "nanobots".

What I'm asking about specifically is that Dr. Ana Mihalcea states in the video, "There's microchips being built in your blood right now. It's pretty much in everybody."

I'm an electronics engineer so I've worked with microchips for several decades and I see no sign of these in the blood samples shown so far. Even if it were true, I don't believe that "It's pretty much in everybody," without strong evidence.

Has anyone here had their blood examined by an expert? I mean someone who works with microchips designed for biological purposes.

Hi, John,

I think we are trying to go too fast. You have a set of beliefs (vaccine contamination, plastic particles), Dr. Mihalcea has a different set of beliefs (self-assembling nanobots). It's going to take awhile to compare both sets of beliefs, and to explain how Dr. Mihalcea came to her conclusions. I'm not trying to avoid getting into it, I just think it will take awhile. I think it can keep getting broken down into smaller questions that can actually be answered.

I do have an answer for you about what kind of microscopes are needed to observe nanoparticles and what the researchers are observing. I will try to post that tomorrow.

[Sunny]

OK, here we go. (And it does lead into a discussion of microscopy.)

It is August 22, 2022.
Three Italian doctors have published a study called “Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna”, in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research.

On this page, you can download a PDF of the whole article, including their photos of damaged blood and anomalous particles: https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/47

From their introduction:
“…In the present study we analyzed with a dark-field optical microscope the peripheral blood drop from 1,006 symptomatic subjects after inoculation with an mRNA injection (Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna), starting from March 2021. There were 948 subjects (94% of the total sample) whose blood showed aggregation of erythrocytes and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA inoculation. In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal hematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves. We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing.”

“The alterations in the erythrocytes show a tendency to aggregation/disintegration, stacking in rouleaux, hemolysis, and other conditions suggestive for an important alteration of their zeta potential (Davidson et al., 2013; Shaw et al., 2014; Davidson & Winey, 2021).”

“Furthermore, there is a well-known tendency for fibrin to cluster that was documented in the biomedical research long ago. These alterations are likely, in our opinions, if not certain, to be involved in producing the coagulation disorders commonly reported after anti-COVID injections (Long et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2021; Seneff et al., 2022).”

“There is also the known vascular toxicity of the spike protein itself (Lei et al., 2021; J. Liu et al., 2021), the principal factor in mRNA injections (Nance & Meier, 2021) and one of the adverse effects in some of the subjects inoculated with mRNA vaccines (Long et al., 2020; Aldén et al., 2022; Trougakos et al., 2022).”

“…the observed abnormalities already found in our micrographs of individuals injected with one or more of the experimental mRNA concoctions of Pfizer or Moderna, can no doubt be attributed in part to the foreign materials some of which we suspect are graphene-family particles. These have been observed by many other expert researchers who have examined the so-called “mRNA vaccines”. What appear to be graphene based technological composites of some sort have been widely discussed by competent researchers including Armin Koroknay (2021), Pablo Campra (2021), Robert O. Young (2021), the distinguished group of New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out with Science (NZDOS, 2022), Andreas Noack (2022), and others. All these doctors and researchers have also examined the actual contents of the so-called SARS-CoV-2 “vaccines”.”

“Additionally, Lee et al. (2022) showed that the strange particulated matter found in the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA injections, also appeared in centifuged blood plasma from recipients of those injections. Such graphene-family materials have been intensively studied by researchers for decades and increasingly so since COVID-19…Taking account of the findings of Ou et al. (2016), showing that “graphene-family nanomaterials” have been associated with “physical destruction, oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis” on account of their stressful impact on “toll-like receptors…transforming growth factor β- (TGF-β-) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)”, if the mRNA concoctions by Pfizer and Moderna do contain the suspected graphene materials, they are implicated as disease causing in the recipients of those vaccines.”

“A second factor known to be involved in disruption of complex biosignaling at the post-translation level of protein production is the supposedly “safe and effective” artificial mRNA concoction aiming to produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the injection recipients. The coding sequence for that spike component was detailed and praised by Nance and Meier (2021) who said that its artificial modifications “cloak mRNA vaccines from the immune system” (p. 753) and supposedly cause the mRNA injected to persevere in producing one spike protein after another by somehow evading the microRNAs that normally regulate the disassembly of the mRNA soon after the protein is produced.”

“Taken together, the toxic blood clotting impact of graphene-family nanoparticles and whatever other particulate matter may be causing clotting, along with the disruptive influence of the modified mRNA producing SARS-CoV-2 spike protein…”

“The sudden transition, usually at the time of a second mRNA injection, from a state of perfect normalcy to a pathological one, with accompanying hemolysis, visible packing and stacking of red blood cells in conjunction with the formation of gigantic conglomerate foreign structures, some of them appearing as graphene-family super-structures, is unprecedented.”

John, this is my takeaway from this study:

1). The researchers are discussing changes in human blood that they were seeing starting in March 2021. They are writing about it in 2022.

2). They think the changes are from the Covid vaccines.

3). They agree with you that it could be from contamination in the vaccines. They think the spike protein produced by the vaccines could also be a factor.

4). They feel that whether it is from contamination or from the spike protein, the causative agents are acting on a nano level.

5). The nano-sized agents are causing the aggregation of proteins into larger structures, which they can observe and photograph on the micro level.

6). They especially note the presence of graphene-based particles in the blood.

7). They cite researchers who found the same particulate matter in people’s blood that they saw in vials of the vaccines.

8). They are using a darkfield optical microscope to examine the blood.

9). They posit that the changes in the blood are caused by nanoparticles (partially because the mRNA in the vaccines is a lipid nanoparticle.) But what they are observing directly is larger structures on a micro level that they feel were created by the aggregation of the nanos.

If you want, we can go next into the questions, what kind of microscopes are needed to look at nanoparticles directly? Is it possible to study nanoparticles using an optical darkfield or brightfield microscope (which is what most researchers have)?

I also agree with you that it would be good to post a photo album of photographs and videos of anomalous objects found in the blood -- another upcoming post.

What are your thoughts?