Theory of the Field of Consciousness

[Edyta Radomska]

Paris, July 14, 2025

Consciousness does not originate from the human organism.
It is a response of the structure to the resonance triggered by the field of consciousness.

The field is a primary substance, like gravity.
It is present everywhere and interacts at the level of electrons.

The activity of the field explains quantum entanglement — electrons interact with each other despite being separated by distance.
This is possible because electrons exist within the field of consciousness and remain in contact through it.

The result of this contact between electrons is not consciousness itself,
but rather the creation of conditions in which a structure can manifest it.
The more sensitive a structure is to the field of consciousness, the greater the consciousness it manifests.


S = Φ / R
S → manifested consciousness
Φ → field intensity (constant) — the Aleks constant
R → resistance of the receiving structure

The existence of the field explains differences in consciousness levels — for example, between humans and animals.

This field affects both living and non-living matter.
The effect of its influence occurs if it encounters electrons along its path.

The field has a constant intensity, and through its interaction at the electron level,
it may support the formation of increasingly refined structures.
This could possibly explain the emergence of life on Earth.

The field of consciousness does not think on its own, does not act independently, and is in no way connected to the concept of God.
It is a purely physical phenomenon — just like gravity.
Consciousness is only its effect, not the field itself.

These are the basic assumptions of the theory.
I am still working on the details.

I am not a physicist or scientist,
but I enjoy observing the world around me and drawing conclusions from it.

I propose the working name “The Aleks Field” in memory of all my serious and playful conversations
with my friend Aleks.

This post was translated from Polish, as I don’t speak English. Please forgive any mistakes.

[Edyta Radomska]

Thank you for the opportunity to share this idea.
I’m open to your thoughts and would love to hear your feedback.

What do you think about this kind of concept?

I have more material, but I wanted to start by sharing the core of it — the heart of the theory.

This post was translated from Polish, as I don’t speak English. Please forgive any mistakes

[shaberon]

Posted by Edyta Radomska (here)
The field of consciousness does not think on its own, does not act independently, and is in no way connected to the concept of God.
It is a purely physical phenomenon — just like gravity.
Consciousness is only its effect, not the field itself.

Hello and welcome,

Yes, many of us have similar ideas, which are difficult to put into words.

It is more difficult to talk about a Field because then it cannot be differentiated from Infinite Space.

I would tend to say that, with respect to the human brain, consciousness is a substance similar to a highly sublimated form of Plasma.

This is identical to the Sun.

This is a manifestation, so, the universal, unmanifest, Absolute Consciousness, is therefor absolutely unconscious from our point of view -- immutable. Consequently, it is nothing physical whatsoever, and cannot be measured. It can be experienced, but not measured.

In terms of electrons, what we used to call Electric Individual exists because of a Direct Current in the body, which runs at about twelve Watts in most people. However, Plasma is like a lighter form of electricity, with a very different mode of operation. It can be measured, and, it is the same substance that exists in free space and the sun and all stars, i. e., is the vast majority of the total energy of the universe.

I think there is benefit to be gained through research in medical Plasma, and the concept there are layers of "subtle plasma", the highest of which is our personal awareness. When it comes to the Absolute I just meditate. Obviously the Manifest operates in the realm of Word and the Absolute does not. But yes the manifested one can do something with its consciousness to convene or commune with this underlying fact of nature.



What we see as the obstacle is the mind creates and destroys the universe in every moment of the Planck scale:

Planck time is roughly 10 ^ -43 seconds. However, to date, the smallest time interval that has been measured is 10 ^ -21 seconds, a "zeptosecond." ...

and what we perceive as motion is really just a series of static frames, made of that.


If it is possible for an electron to (a) travel at the speed of light, or (b) reach the Event Horizon, this means that all events in the universe will become simultaneous. Eternity will be a unit on the Planck scale. One instant, everything. No separation by time or space.

I don't know if that happens, but, we do know creation happens, i. e. stars are mostly born in the nebulae and so on. Unfortunately the mind replicates this process mostly due to subconscious habits and crude impulses. That is why we try to reverse it.

[samsdice]

Dobre Edyta & Welcome.

This brought to mind the thread "The Telepathy Tapes" which describes some of our inate abilities, more prevalent in non verbal autistics (and others).

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...elepathy+Tapes

The Telepathy Tapes podcast goes into this much more and is well worth a listen -

1 Jul 06 2.5K Talk Tracks Ep 13: Telepathy and Eastern Wisdom with Anu Gupta
2 Jun 22 3.6K Talk Tracks Ep 12: What Lucid Dreaming Reveals About Reality
3 Jun 08 3.5K Talk Tracks Ep 11: Tom Campbell's Theory of Everything Explains Telepathy
4 Jun 02 1.3K Ky Has A Big Announcement...
5 May 25 3.3K Talk Tracks Ep 10: Healing Through Telepathy
6 May 11 3.1K Talk Tracks Ep 9: The Science of Intuition: Consciousness, Intention, and the Edge of Reality
7 Apr 27 3.8K Talk Tracks Ep 8: The Skeptic Who Couldn’t Debunk The Telepathy Tapes
8 Apr 18 3.0K Talk Tracks Ep 7: Telepathy Between Species
9 Apr 13 3.0K BONUS - LIVE TALK TRACKS EPISODE - Love Beyond Words
10 Mar 30 2.7K Talk Tracks Ep 6: Alzheimer's and Telepathy
11 Mar 16 2.8K Talk Tracks Ep 5: Consciousness Beyond The Body: When a Coma Projects a Ghost
12 Mar 02 3.0K Talk Tracks Ep 4: Awakening the Mind-Body Connection ft. Suzy Miller
13 Feb 16 1.9K Talk Tracks Ep 3: Q&A with Parents, Scientists & Educators from Season One
14 Feb 02 3.1K Talk Tracks Ep 2: Exploring Animal Telepathy with Ditte Young
15 Jan 19 2.2K Talk Tracks Ep 1: A Volunteer’s Passage to the Hill
16 Dec 23 2.3K Ep 10: In Their Words: Messages from the Non-Speakers
17 Nov 25 3.5K Ep. 9: Telepathy Across Dimensions, Death, and Beyond
18 Nov 17 1.7K Announcement
19 Nov 11 2.2K Ep. 8: Gatekeepers of Truth - Telepathy and the Spelling Controversy
20 Oct 28 2.4K Ep 7: Telepathy is the Tip of the Iceberg
21 Oct 14 3.9K Ep 6: Scientific Evidence for ESP that Shatters the Materialist Paradigm
22 Oct 07 2.5K Ep. 5: Teachers Break the Silence about Telepathy
23 Sep 30 2.5K Ep 4: Teen Love with a Twist of Telepathy
24 Sep 23 2.4K Ep 3: Telepathic Communication between friends and groups
25 Sep 16 2.6K Ep 2: Telepathy or the merging of consciousness?
26 Sep 09 2.7K Ep 1: Unveiling the Hidden World of Telepathic Communication in a Silenced Community

The Telepathy Tapes podcast RSS feed:
https://feeds.megaphone.fm/BOOJE7456615667

Put this into a podcast app to listen to any of the shows.

Kind Regards

[Edyta Radomska]

Thank you very much for the link and for your response.
Unfortunately, I don’t speak English and I’m not able to understand the content of the podcast .

[Edyta Radomska]

I also believe that some of these abilities (like telepathy or deep resonance) are not “gifts” but natural, original capacities — just quiet ones, hidden behind the noise of words and thoughts.

Sometimes I feel that this universal Field (or whatever we call it) is not only around us, but between us — and when the mind becomes quiet enough, something else starts to speak.

[Edyta Radomska]

Thank you very much for your thoughtful response.
I can feel that your view resonates with the idea I tried to describe — especially the part about subtle layers and the notion that manifestation arises through contact with something fundamental.
I don’t have a scientific background, and I approach this more as an observer who draws conclusions from experience and intuition.
I agree that language often fails when we try to talk about these deep aspects of reality — maybe that’s why I like simple metaphors.
The idea of motion being just a sequence of static frames is fascinating — and somehow it matches my sense that time can bend or stretch depending on inner resonance.

This post was translated from Polish, as I don’t speak English. Please forgive any mistakes.)

[Johnnycomelately]

Hi Edyta. Welcome, and thanks for this cool thread.

The idea of motion being just a sequence of static frames is fascinating — and somehow it matches my sense that time can bend or stretch depending on inner resonance.

Sorry if I missed it upthread, but do you strive to gain or lose time? The former would seem a more adventurous mindset, getting more life in. Latter would be like me at the bar when I forget somebody’s name, “HEY I DRINK TO FORGET!”.

Cheers.


Edit to add in Polish.

Przepraszam, jeśli przegapiłem to w wątku, ale czy starasz się zyskać czy stracić czas? Ten pierwszy wydawałby się bardziej przygodowym sposobem myślenia, wprowadzającym więcej życia. To ostatnie byłoby jak ja w barze, kiedy zapomnę czyjegoś imienia: "HEJ, PIJĘ, ŻEBY ZAPOMNIEĆ!".
Dziękuję.

[grapevine]

Posted by Johnnycomelately (here)
Hi Edyta. Welcome, and thanks for this cool thread.

The idea of motion being just a sequence of static frames is fascinating — and somehow it matches my sense that time can bend or stretch depending on inner resonance.

Sorry if I missed it upthread, but do you strive to gain or lose time? The former would seem a more adventurous mindset, getting more life in. Latter would be like me at the bar when I forget somebody’s name, “HEY I DRINK TO FORGET!”.

Cheers.

Unfortunately, Consciousness doesn't come with a User Manual and we do our best sometimes to escape the life we've created for ourselves, ie. drinking alcohol for instance lowers our frequency, whereas meditation heightens it and drugs take us somewhere else altogether.

There are no "quick fixes" but a User Manual sure would be handy.

Welcome to the forum Edyta

Polish translation courtesy of Google Translate:
Niestety, Świadomość nie ma instrukcji obsługi i czasami staramy się jak możemy, aby uciec od życia, które sami sobie stworzyliśmy, np. picie alkoholu obniża naszą częstotliwość, medytacja ją podnosi, a narkotyki przenoszą nas w zupełnie inne miejsce.

Nie ma „szybkich rozwiązań”, ale instrukcja obsługi z pewnością byłaby przydatna.

Witaj na forum Edyta

[Edyta Radomska]

Hi, and thank you for this great and playful question!

To be honest, I’m not really striving to gain or lose time. It feels more like… I’m observing how time behaves differently depending on the state of inner resonance — like when the “receiver” (our body-mind structure) is more aligned, time expands, and experience deepens.

I see time not as a straight line, but as something that bends around the intensity of presence. That’s what I meant when I wrote about motion being just a sequence of still frames. In moments of deep silence or clarity, it feels like everything stands still — yet so much happens. I don’t know if that’s gaining time or losing it. Maybe it’s just being in time, fully.

I’m not a scientist, just someone trying to describe what it feels like to touch that field of awareness — what I call the “field of consciousness”. And sometimes it plays with time the way dreams do. Or jokes at the bar 😄

Thanks again!

(This post was translated from Polish, as I don’t speak English. Please forgive any mistakes.)

[seekingtruth]

Posted by Edyta Radomska (here)
Thank you very much for the link and for your response.
Unfortunately, I don’t speak English and I’m not able to understand the content of the podcast .

You can transcribe the episodes here, then translate those files. Bit of a headache but the content is definitely worth it.

https://www.happyscribe.com/public/the-telepathy-tapes

[Edyta Radomska]

Thank you, Grapevine, for this warm welcome.

What you wrote resonates deeply with the core of the idea I’m exploring – that our experience of time and reality is not fixed, but shaped by the quality of our inner receiver.

In my view, Consciousness is not something we possess or generate. It is more like a universal field – always present, like gravity or light – and we simply become more or less attuned to it, depending on the structure of our mind, body, and emotions.

There’s no user manual, as you said – but perhaps the silence before thoughts, and the awareness that precedes reaction, is a kind of inner compass.

So I wouldn’t say I strive to gain or lose time. I simply listen. And when something resonates deeply – like your words just did – it bends time inward for a moment, into Presence.

Warm greetings from the non-English-speaking side of this field. I use a translator, but the field doesn’t need translation.

This post was translated from Polish, as I don’t speak English. Please forgive any mistakes.

[Edyta Radomska]

I came across these photos and they made me think.

People often talk about “aura” or “energy field” around living beings. Some say it’s just photography effects. Some believe it shows something more – maybe something we can’t see with our eyes, but can feel.

I don’t know the full truth. I’m not a scientist. I’m just curious about life and how things work.

Could it be that what we call “aura” is part of something deeper?
Something that connects us — like a field that’s always there, around and inside everything?

I’m not trying to prove anything. I’m just sharing a thought.
What do you think?

(These are just example photos found online. I’m not sure how authentic they are, but they made me wonder.)

[RunningDeer]

Posted by Edyta Radomska (here)
I’m exploring – that our experience of time and reality is not fixed, but shaped by the quality of our inner receiver.

In my view, Consciousness is not something we possess or generate. It is more like a universal field – always present, like gravity or light – and we simply become more or less attuned to it, depending on the structure of our mind, body, and emotions.

There’s no user manual, as you said – but perhaps the silence before thoughts, and the awareness that precedes reaction, is a kind of inner compass.

So I wouldn’t say I strive to gain or lose time. I simply listen. And when something resonates deeply – like your words just did – it bends time inward for a moment, into Presence.

Welcome to Avalon, Edyta.

I had an experience where time stopped just long enough to show me that we’re more than passengers in a script. It opens us to the greater possibilities of the human experience.

Summer, 2012 - “Stopping Time” (repost)

Wolfie, my dog, and I were out for a walk near the local shopping mall. There's a patch of woods on the outskirts where he usually does his business. That day, he couldn’t wait and picked a spot right where everyone was out and about, running their Saturday errands.

I was looking down to see if he’d finished, feeling a little embarrassed. My inner dialogue was running: “I hope no one comes by.” Still looking down, but with my eyes lifted just enough, I noticed something strange...four cars, suspended in time. Two were on the far side of the median, and two were several car lengths apart on our side, headed in our direction. They weren’t moving. Everything had stopped.

Then, a few seconds later, they drove on as if nothing had happened.

It took about 30 seconds before I could even begin to process what I’d seen. At first, I doubted it. “That’s impossible.” But before my programmed beliefs could take over, I let it be. We kept walking for a while. Then I asked myself: “What happened just before that moment?”

I mentally rewound the tape and realized there had been a strong desire for a different outcome. When the mind suspends from conditioned reality, something more spacious enters. That reality is far less fixed between consciousness and form.

Witamy w Avalonie, Edyta.

Miałem doświadczenie, w którym czas zatrzymał się na tyle długo, by pokazać mi, że jesteśmy kimś więcej niż tylko pasażerami w scenariuszu. To otwiera nas na większe możliwości ludzkiego doświadczenia.

Lato 2012 - „Zatrzymanie czasu” (repost)

Wolfie, mój pies, i ja byliśmy na spacerze w pobliżu lokalnego centrum handlowego. Na jego obrzeżach znajduje się skrawek lasu, w którym zazwyczaj załatwia swoje potrzeby. Tego dnia nie mógł się doczekać i wybrał miejsce, w którym wszyscy byli poza domem, załatwiając swoje sobotnie sprawy.

Spojrzałem w dół, by sprawdzić, czy już skończył, czując się trochę zakłopotany. Mój wewnętrzny dialog brzmiał: „Mam nadzieję, że nikt nie przyjdzie”. Wciąż patrząc w dół, ale z oczami uniesionymi wystarczająco wysoko, zauważyłem coś dziwnego - cztery samochody, zawieszone w czasie. Dwa znajdowały się po przeciwnej stronie jezdni, a dwa, oddalone od siebie o kilka długości samochodu, jechały w naszym kierunku. Nie poruszały się. Wszystko się zatrzymało.

Kilka sekund później jechały dalej, jakby nic się nie stało.

Przetłumaczono z DeepL.com (wersja darmowa)

Minęło około 30 sekund, zanim mogłem zacząć przetwarzać to, co zobaczyłem. Na początku w to wątpiłem. „To niemożliwe”. Ale zanim moje zaprogramowane przekonania mogły przejąć kontrolę, pozwoliłem na to. Przez chwilę szliśmy dalej. Potem zadałem sobie pytanie: „Co wydarzyło się tuż przed tym momentem?”.

Mentalnie przewinąłem taśmę i zdałem sobie sprawę, że istniało silne pragnienie osiągnięcia innego rezultatu. Kiedy umysł zawiesza się w uwarunkowanej rzeczywistości, wkracza coś bardziej przestronnego. Ta rzeczywistość jest znacznie mniej sztywna między świadomością a formą.

[panpsych]

A very warm welcome to you Edyta!

I really enjoyed reading this. It’s not often you see someone take a direct shot at modelling consciousness from first principles; honestly, there’s real bravery in that.

Naming it “The Aleks Field” is a great move, not just because it’s personal, but because it mirrors the subject of the theory itself.

If consciousness is a universal field that only becomes meaningful when it interacts with specific structures, what better way to reflect that than by naming the field after a particular relationship? The personal isn’t an afterthought here; it’s part of the architecture.

I also think the idea of a field resonance model is a productive path to explore. It raises interesting questions about how structures might vary in their receptivity to consciousness, and whether there’s a meaningful difference between passive participation in the field and active modulation of it.

There’s something intuitively useful in the formula you’ve suggested—S = Φ / R. It maps well onto the idea that consciousness is everywhere, but its expression depends on how receptive or resistant a structure is. That opens the door to interesting questions about how systems tune into, filter, or obscure consciousness, depending on their organisation. There’s a lot to think about in that frame.

I'm excited to see where you take this next.

———

Cześć Edyta,

Z dużym zainteresowaniem przeczytałem Twój post. Rzadko spotyka się kogoś, kto podejmuje próbę modelowania świadomości od podstaw; szczerze mówiąc, jest w tym prawdziwa odwaga.

Nadanie temu teorii nazwy „Pole Aleksa” to świetny ruch—nie tylko dlatego, że jest osobista, ale też dlatego, że odzwierciedla samą naturę tej koncepcji. Jeśli świadomość jest uniwersalnym polem, które nabiera znaczenia dopiero w kontakcie z konkretnymi strukturami, to czy może być lepszy sposób, by to pokazać, niż nazwać to pole na cześć konkretnej relacji? Osobisty aspekt nie jest tutaj dodatkiem; on jest częścią samej architektury pomysłu.

Sam pomysł modelu rezonansowego pola to, moim zdaniem, ciekawy kierunek do eksploracji. Pojawiają się przy tym pytania o to, jak różne struktury mogą różnić się pod względem podatności na odbiór świadomości i czy istnieje istotna różnica między biernym udziałem w polu a jego aktywną modulacją. To przestrzeń dla wielu kreatywnych przemyśleń.

Jeśli chodzi o wzór—S = Φ / R—podoba mi się, że daje to pewien punkt wyjścia do dalszej zabawy z tą ideą. Może nie chodzi tu jeszcze o precyzyjne równania, ale raczej o wskazanie odpowiednich zależności: pole jest wszędzie, ale jego manifestacja zależy od tego, jak bardzo dana struktura jest otwarta lub oporna na jego działanie. To ciekawa rama do dalszych rozważań.

Jestem ciekaw, dokąd jeszcze poprowadzisz ten wątek.

[Edyta Radomska]

Posted by RunningDeer (here)

Posted by Edyta Radomska (here)
I’m exploring – that our experience of time and reality is not fixed, but shaped by the quality of our inner receiver.

In my view, Consciousness is not something we possess or generate. It is more like a universal field – always present, like gravity or light – and we simply become more or less attuned to it, depending on the structure of our mind, body, and emotions.

There’s no user manual, as you said – but perhaps the silence before thoughts, and the awareness that precedes reaction, is a kind of inner compass.

So I wouldn’t say I strive to gain or lose time. I simply listen. And when something resonates deeply – like your words just did – it bends time inward for a moment, into Presence.

Welcome to Avalon, Edyta.

I had an experience where time stopped just long enough to show me that we’re more than passengers in a script. It opens us to the greater possibilities of the human experience.

Summer, 2012 - “Stopping Time” (repost)

Wolfie, my dog, and I were out for a walk near the local shopping mall. There's a patch of woods on the outskirts where he usually does his business. That day, he couldn’t wait and picked a spot right where everyone was out and about, running their Saturday errands.

I was looking down to see if he’d finished, feeling a little embarrassed. My inner dialogue was running: “I hope no one comes by.” Still looking down, but with my eyes lifted just enough, I noticed something strange...four cars, suspended in time. Two were on the far side of the median, and two were several car lengths apart on our side, headed in our direction. They weren’t moving. Everything had stopped.

Then, a few seconds later, they drove on as if nothing had happened.

It took about 30 seconds before I could even begin to process what I’d seen. At first, I doubted it. “That’s impossible.” But before my programmed beliefs could take over, I let it be. We kept walking for a while. Then I asked myself: “What happened just before that moment?”

I mentally rewound the tape and realized there had been a strong desire for a different outcome. When the mind suspends from conditioned reality, something more spacious enters. That reality is far less fixed between consciousness and form.

Witamy w Avalonie, Edyta.

Miałem doświadczenie, w którym czas zatrzymał się na tyle długo, by pokazać mi, że jesteśmy kimś więcej niż tylko pasażerami w scenariuszu. To otwiera nas na większe możliwości ludzkiego doświadczenia.

Lato 2012 - „Zatrzymanie czasu” (repost)

Wolfie, mój pies, i ja byliśmy na spacerze w pobliżu lokalnego centrum handlowego. Na jego obrzeżach znajduje się skrawek lasu, w którym zazwyczaj załatwia swoje potrzeby. Tego dnia nie mógł się doczekać i wybrał miejsce, w którym wszyscy byli poza domem, załatwiając swoje sobotnie sprawy.

Spojrzałem w dół, by sprawdzić, czy już skończył, czując się trochę zakłopotany. Mój wewnętrzny dialog brzmiał: „Mam nadzieję, że nikt nie przyjdzie”. Wciąż patrząc w dół, ale z oczami uniesionymi wystarczająco wysoko, zauważyłem coś dziwnego - cztery samochody, zawieszone w czasie. Dwa znajdowały się po przeciwnej stronie jezdni, a dwa, oddalone od siebie o kilka długości samochodu, jechały w naszym kierunku. Nie poruszały się. Wszystko się zatrzymało.

Kilka sekund później jechały dalej, jakby nic się nie stało.

Przetłumaczono z DeepL.com (wersja darmowa)

Minęło około 30 sekund, zanim mogłem zacząć przetwarzać to, co zobaczyłem. Na początku w to wątpiłem. „To niemożliwe”. Ale zanim moje zaprogramowane przekonania mogły przejąć kontrolę, pozwoliłem na to. Przez chwilę szliśmy dalej. Potem zadałem sobie pytanie: „Co wydarzyło się tuż przed tym momentem?”.

Mentalnie przewinąłem taśmę i zdałem sobie sprawę, że istniało silne pragnienie osiągnięcia innego rezultatu. Kiedy umysł zawiesza się w uwarunkowanej rzeczywistości, wkracza coś bardziej przestronnego. Ta rzeczywistość jest znacznie mniej sztywna między świadomością a formą.

Thank you very much for your reply.
Your experience is close to mine, because I feel something very similar lately.
Not exactly that time stops — but like it slows down, especially around me.

For example, I was sitting on a bench, watching pigeons, and I noticed their feet were moving slower than normal, like in a slow-motion movie.
At first I thought maybe they were sick — but then I realised it’s not that.

Sometimes I feel like my time flows a bit differently than the time of people around me.
Like I’m in a kind of glass bubble — that’s how my partner described it — I’m still connected to the world, but also a bit separated.
And inside that bubble, time moves differently for me.

It’s hard to explain.
But yes — what you said resonates deeply with me and my experience.
Thank you for sharing

[Edyta Radomska]

Thank you so much for your beautiful reply.
I’m really happy that you found the idea of “The Aleks Field” inspiring — it came very naturally to me, like it was already there, just waiting to be named. 😊

Yes, the formula S = Φ / R is not meant to be an exact equation, but rather a symbolic way of expressing something fundamental:
That the field is always there (Φ), and what changes is how much of it can be expressed — depending on the openness or resistance of the structure (R).

So much can be explored within this simple frame.
I believe it opens the door not only to scientific speculation, but also to deeply human reflection — on why we feel more “alive” or “aware” in some moments and less in others.

Thank you again for reading and for sharing your thoughts — and for the Polish translation, which I really appreciate!
It means a lot to feel understood both in the language of theory… and the heart. 🤍

[RunningDeer]

Posted by Edyta Radomska (here)
Thank you very much for your reply.
Your experience is close to mine, because I feel something very similar lately.
Not exactly that time stops — but like it slows down, especially around me.

For example, I was sitting on a bench, watching pigeons, and I noticed their feet were moving slower than normal, like in a slow-motion movie.
At first I thought maybe they were sick — but then I realised it’s not that.

Sometimes I feel like my time flows a bit differently than the time of people around me.
Like I’m in a kind of glass bubble — that’s how my partner described it — I’m still connected to the world, but also a bit separated.
And inside that bubble, time moves differently for me.

It’s hard to explain.
But yes — what you said resonates deeply with me and my experience.
Thank you for sharing

Your line, “inside that bubble, time moves differently for me,” reminded me of an experience I had with my sister. In those first few moments, I surmised our frequencies didn’t match.

September, 2017

I arrived twenty minutes early to the restaurant and called my sister, Sarah (name changed), to let her know I was already in our favorite booth. Immersed in my book, I didn’t notice she arrived.

She was no more than five feet (1.5 meters) away, yet she couldn’t see me. It wasn’t until I looked up that she caught sight of me and was startled.

Sarah had already scanned the room to check if I’d chosen a different booth. It was off-peak hours, with only a few people around, so I should’ve been easy to spot. Still puzzled, she asked if I was doing that “Ninja invisibility” thing to trick her.

Summer, 2019

The situation presented the perfect opportunity to test out this 'frequency' idea. It happened at the community mailboxes. Shirley, my neighbor was busy retrieving her mail. Normally, we’d exchange a quick hello, but this time I stood quietly, about five or six feet (1.5 to 1.8 meters) away just inside her peripheral vision. I slowly moved closer as she finished, but she still didn’t notice me. I was close enough to greet her, but I held back, not wanting to startle her.

She walked right past me, completely unaware.

Twój tekst „wewnątrz tej bańki czas płynie dla mnie inaczej” przypomniał mi o doświadczeniu, które miałem z moją siostrą. W tych pierwszych chwilach domyśliłem się, że nasze częstotliwości nie pasują do siebie.

Wrzesień 2017 r.

Przybyłam do restauracji dwadzieścia minut wcześniej i zadzwoniłam do mojej siostry, Sary (imię zmienione), aby poinformować ją, że jestem już w naszej ulubionej kabinie. Zanurzony w książce, nie zauważyłem jej przybycia.

Była nie dalej niż pięć stóp (1,5 metra) ode mnie, ale nie mogła mnie zobaczyć. Dopiero gdy podniosłem wzrok, zauważyła mnie i była zaskoczona.

Sarah zdążyła już przeskanować pomieszczenie, by sprawdzić, czy nie wybrałem innej kabiny. Było to poza godzinami szczytu, tylko kilka osób było w pobliżu, więc powinienem być łatwy do zauważenia. Wciąż zdziwiona zapytała, czy robię tę „niewidzialność Ninja”, aby ją oszukać.

Lato, 2019

Sytuacja stanowiła idealną okazję do przetestowania pomysłu „częstotliwości”. Zdarzyło się to przy skrzynkach pocztowych. Shirley, moja sąsiadka, była zajęta odbieraniem poczty. Normalnie wymienialibyśmy szybkie przywitanie, ale tym razem stałem cicho, około pięciu lub sześciu stóp (1,5 do 1,8 metra) od niej, tuż wewnątrz jej peryferyjnego widzenia. Powoli zbliżyłem się, gdy skończyła, ale nadal mnie nie zauważyła. Byłem wystarczająco blisko, by ją powitać, ale powstrzymałem się, nie chcąc jej przestraszyć.

Przeszła obok mnie, zupełnie nieświadoma.

[Edyta Radomska]

Thank you for sharing your story.
I’ve had a similar experience in my own life.

Sometimes my partner tells me that I “scare” him — not because I do anything unusual, but because he says one moment I’m not there, and the next moment I suddenly appear right next to him.
He says he looks around, doesn’t see me anywhere, and then all of a sudden I’m just there, without warning.

From my side, I feel like I’m walking towards him in a normal way — nothing strange at all. But if his perception is that I wasn’t visible until the last second, maybe we really were on different frequencies, just like you described.

This helped me see that shifts in awareness or perception can be real — not just imagination. Thank you again for writing.

(This post was translated from Polish, as I don’t speak English. Please forgive any mistakes.)

[rgray222]

Posted by Edyta Radomska (here)
I came across these photos and they made me think.

People often talk about “aura” or “energy field” around living beings. Some say it’s just photography effects. Some believe it shows something more – maybe something we can’t see with our eyes, but can feel.

I don’t know the full truth. I’m not a scientist. I’m just curious about life and how things work.

Could it be that what we call “aura” is part of something deeper?
Something that connects us — like a field that’s always there, around and inside everything?

I’m not trying to prove anything. I’m just sharing a thought.
What do you think?

(These are just example photos found online. I’m not sure how authentic they are, but they made me wonder.)

If you enjoy these photos, you should consider reading the Celestine Prophecy. It is fiction, but it is so much more than just a fiction book. It is a short, quick read, and it will make you consider consciousness and connectivity in ways you have not thought about.