Why and who actually organized the First World War

[Russian Bear]

Sciences and technology in the beginning of XX century were developing at a fast pace: radio, electricity, cinematograph, automobiles… Millions of Europeans could hardly catch up with the swift scientific and technological advance and they were unable to surmise that something threatens their lives. But in 1914 a war emerged that humanity had never seen before. The first war of armored machines and airplanes, machineguns and poison gases. The war that began with the murder of two people and ended with over 10 million deaths and the ruining of four empires. World War I that changed the face of Europe and the whole world for ever.

Type: historical reenactment
Genre: docudrama
Year of production: 2014
Number of episodes: 8

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=lymm8TU900E

You will find the remaining 7 episodes for yourself. There are English subtitles here.



⚔️Why and who actually organized the First World War

Look at this postcard ⬇️


Emperor of Germany Wilhelm II and Emperor of Russia Nicholas II

It shows Emperor of Germany Wilhelm II and Emperor of Russia Nicholas II.
They were relatives, cousins and family friends.
The Emperor of Germany was also a cousin of Nicholas II's wife Alexandra Feodorovna.

But as we know, this did not stop them from taking up arms in 1914.

This postcard, on which the monarchs are smiling at each other, was published in France a few days before the start of World War I,
where the fiercest battles were fought between Russia and Germany.

Let me remind you that the First World War, which lasted from 1914 to November 11, 1918, was fought between two military blocs:
▪️◾️ the Entente (Russia, France, Great Britain) and
▪️◾️ the countries of the Triple Alliance (Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy;
▪️◾️ since 1915 — the Quadruple Alliance: (Germany, Austria-Hungary, Turkey and Bulgaria).

In fact, as in World War II, it was mainly Russia that fought.

The formal reason for the war was the assassination of the heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, by Serbian nationalists in 1914 in Sarajevo (Bosnia).

Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia,
Russia came to the aid of Serbia,
and Germany came to the aid of Austria-Hungary.

That's how it all started.
World War I ended with the complete defeat and capitulation of Germany and its allies.

Russia was supposed to be the main winner and beneficiary in this war. But because of the revolutions, our country left the war just before victory, and was essentially used and abandoned by the allies.

Regarding World War I, they often say: “Nobody wanted the war. The war was inevitable.” Or, on the contrary, that the meat grinder, which lasted 4 years and took millions of lives, began by chance due to the murder of the Austro-Hungarian heir in Serbia.

But in fact, this war was prepared for more than 20 years.

And there were no accidents here, only strict adherence to the plan.

▶️ Today we will analyze the true causes of the First World War, which few people talk about,
▶️ who actually organized it and
▶️ why.

"ENGLISH TRACE"

To understand who organized the war, let's look at who won from it.

⛔️ Germany was defeated, lost territories and was forced to pay reparations.
⛔️ The Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman and Russian empires collapsed.
⛔️ Plus, Russia was hit by the February and October revolutions.
By the way, when British Prime Minister Lloyd George learned about the overthrow of the monarchy, he said: “One of the goals of this war has been achieved.”

Look how telling: Britain was an ally of Russia at that time, and its minister says that the overthrow of the tsar is one of the goals achieved.

✅ England and the United States emerged from World War I as the most powerful countries in the world.

✅ The United States turned from a debtor into a creditor: all developed countries, including Britain, owed them money.

And there is nothing surprising about this.
Back in the early 1880s, the British elite faced two pressing issues: German and Russian.

The Germans had to be removed as competitors,
and resources were needed from Russia.

The whole point is that by that time the colonies had already been divided.
Then all that was possible was to take land from each other.

Capital demanded new resources, and at the same time markets and cheap labor. Russia, with its wealth, was the best fit for this role.

In 1884, a conference was held in the West, where it was decided that countries that had natural resources, but were not able to develop them, should open up to the international community, that is, the West. And those who do not do this will be forced.
Officially, it was about Africa.

But everyone understood that no one would warn it. It would simply be captured, which is what happened at the end of the 19th century.
In fact, that conference threatened Russia. But then Russia was ruled by Alexander III, who was a strong emperor, and the country was still strong, not entangled in debt.

So the issue was left to the war and the February Revolution.
At a minimum, Russia should have
LOSSED ITS STATUS AS A GREAT POWER,
and at a maximum, LOST ITS economic and political INDEPENDENCE.

And, if we talk about the Anglo-Americans, they could not allow the most terrible thing for them (by the way, this is the most terrible thing for them to this day) - a Russian-German alliance. The very existence of the British Empire depended on it.

The best way: to pit Russia and Germany against each other,
but to do it in the form of a European war.

The war was supposed to destroy the empires and create small states in their place that would be easy to manage. And there is nothing personal here: just business.

The globalist principle is absolutely contrary to the imperial one.
The empire interferes with the flow of goods, especially when behind it stands a Christian civilization far from capitalism, that is, Russia.

So, partly, the British started the mess. But not all. 90% of the parliament were against the war.

The real leadership of Britain was then taken by the secret structure "We", or "The Group". It was created by Cecil Rhodes - a man of the Rothschilds.


Cecil Rhodes

He was a colonialist; Northern and Southern Rhodesia in Africa, now Zimbabwe, are named after him. The group consisted of the Anglo-American elite and set itself an immodest task: to establish world domination of the Anglo-Saxons as the superior race.

And to do this, it was necessary:
▶️ to make friends with the USA again,
▶️ to eliminate competitors and
▶️ to appropriate their resources.

So the doctrine of racism was developed in England.
The Germans simply revived the British developments.

In Britain, the “Group” promoted Churchill and Lloyd George.
In Russia and France, it also had its own agents: Foreign Minister Alexander Izvolsky and Raymond Poincaré.

These were the very people who actively worked on the creation of the Entente - an international bloc against Germany.
Entente is translated as “cordial agreement”.

But there was little cordiality there: England did not take on any military obligations. The alliances it entered into only delimited the sphere of influence in the regions.

It agreed with Russia on the Middle East and Tibet. In fact, this was the peak of English diplomacy. This allowed them to convince the Germans in 1914 that Britain would not enter the war in the event of a conflict.

By the way, they did the same in World War II, when they made it clear that if Hitler attacked the USSR, they would not interfere.

Before World War I, Russia's dependence on France was growing.

By 1914, 80% of the empire's debts belonged to French banks, and the banks were controlled by the Rothschilds.

They provided loans, while at the same time sponsoring revolutionaries, working to destroy Russia.

Izvolsky, the head of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, received support and money from the Anglo-Saxons, and in return did everything to set the Balkans against Germany and Austria-Hungary.

The Russian ambassador to Serbia, Nicholas Hartwig, also played on the side of the "Group".

By 1914, they had already tried to provoke Germany twice - with the First Balkan War against Turkey and the Second - against Bulgaria, a traditional ally of the Germans.

So the question "where will it explode?" was essentially not an issue.
It was clear where - in the Balkans.

Moreover, Serbia was riddled with British agents and was more dependent than anyone on foreign capital. So the British had room to roam and they could provoke a war.

Hartwig was closely associated with the "Black Hand" - a terrorist organization, a member of which Gavrilo Princip killed the Austrian prince Ferdinand. This is usually called the pretext for the start of the war.


Gavrilo Princip - Serbian nationalist
The fate of the perpetrators is interesting here.

▶️ Princip was supposed to commit suicide, but potassium cyanide did not work. And rightly so: a living Serb was needed for the trial, to stir up even greater hatred of Austria-Hungary towards Serbia.
He died only in 1918 in prison. Officially from tuberculosis.
▶️ Hartwig died in 1914 in the Austrian embassy, where he came for a reception.
▶️ And in 1919, Izvolsky suddenly died. Before that, he began writing memoirs, planning to tell the whole truth about the war.

INTERESTING COINCIDENCE
The war could have started earlier, because the main preparations were completed by 1907 with the formation of the Entente.

But the moment was delayed: the bankers could not sort things out with the USA. They were not going to destroy them. Another scheme was in place: to establish control over finances and get more profit from the military conflict.

That is, it was necessary to create a structure, preferably on a non-belligerent continent, that would finance the war.
The United States of America was perfect.

In this country, from the moment of its creation, there was a dispute about who should print money: a private bank or the treasury (i.e. the state).

In essence, this was a struggle between Anglo-Saxon capital and the American nation.

As a result, from 1776 to 1913, this right passed from the government to the banks 8 times.

In the 19th century, the Rothschilds clearly outlined the course: to return America under their control.

And the following years went towards this and destroyed the presidents who resisted.

For example, in 1832, Andrew Jackson's campaign slogan was "Jackson and no bank!" i.e. a central bank under the control of oligarchs.
He managed to revoke the license, but there were two assassination attempts. Both were unsuccessful, and Jackson was lucky to die a natural death.

The same cannot be said about Abraham Lincoln. In order not to borrow from London, he decided to print banknotes himself. They were needed to finance the Civil War. And, it seems, it was for such impudence that Lincoln was killed in 1865.
And today many are of the opinion that it was European bankers who ordered it - the same ones who at one time held shares in the Central Bank of America.

Another president, James Garfield, was shot point-blank in 1881.
True, he encroached not only on the bank, but also on another "sacred cow" of the Anglo-Saxons - the right to appoint senior officials.

(History, Conspiracy) How the CIA Killed John Kennedy by Blaming the US President's Death on a Lone Psychopath: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1664429

Since the founding of the United States, it has not been presidents who have done this, but campaign sponsors.

In 1901, William McKinley was assassinated. A year after he introduced the gold standard. Every dollar had to be backed by gold, which made it even more difficult to print private money without control.

At the beginning of the 20th century, the most influential oligarchs in the world were European bankers. Let's say the same Rothschilds owned the oldest Central Bank - the Bank of England. They also wanted to subjugate America. That is, to get the right to print their money there.

The banker John Morgan pushed through the Rothschilds' interests in America. The Warburgs, Schiffs, and Kuhns were also connected with them.

These bankers staged a crisis in 1907 to gain control over money.

The method was simple:
↪️ they spread rumors about the bankruptcy of some banks.
↪️ In the midst of panic, Morgan was given permission to issue $200 million.
↪️ This money went to loans to banks that were not doing well.
↪️ Morgan actually played the role of a regulator and looked like the savior of the country. Showing that, they say, he and his supporters, if anything, can save the country's economy, and they should be allowed to create a private bank. Not for themselves, of course - for the economy of the United States.

The bankers finally won in 1913, when they pushed the Federal Reserve Act through Congress.

Money began to be controlled by 12 private banks. This law was signed by the Anglo-Saxon protégé Woodrow Wilson. For this reason, he was seated in the presidential chair. It is not surprising that Wilson's portrait is on the hundred thousand dollar bill.


Woodrow Wilson on the $100,0000 bill

Since the US Federal Reserve, also known as the Central Bank of the United States of America, was created under the control of oligarchs. It was possible to start a war to subjugate all of Europe by lending money.
Which is what happened 7 months later.

In order to pay for military expenses, governments were forced to borrow from the Fed and thereby enrich its owners.

The Entente countries spent $147 billion on the war at the 1913 exchange rate.
*In our money, this is several trillion.

For comparison, the national wealth of England, France and Italy at that time was estimated at the same $150 billion.

Loans were issued to almost all European countries: from Britain to Serbia. And if in 1914 the US debt was $3 billion, then by 1920 the Europeans alone owed America $20 billion, or more than 300 at the current exchange rate.

About seven of them went to the purchase of ammunition and weapons, and in the United States itself, which stimulated its economy.

As a result, after the war, a country with 6% of the world's population controlled half of the world's industry.

President Woodrow Wilson then declared: “We have to finance the world, and therefore lead it.”

The Anglo-Saxon oligarchs did something similar after World War II, and the United States had 50% of the world’s GDP.

Thus, the United States of America turned from a debtor into the largest creditor.

In 1918, 45% of the world’s gold reserves were in the United States.

By the beginning of World War I, Russia had a record gold volume of 1,695 tons, and about 500 of them were sent to bankers to secure loans.

Incidentally, Germany finished paying reparations for World War I only in 2010, having given up almost 100 thousand tons of gold in total.

The owners of the money made a huge profit, so their plan was a success economically.

The war became both a source of income and a means of destroying empires.

They repeated it for an encore 20 years later. The terms of the Versailles Peace (i.e. the end of World War I) became the basis for World War II.

And one more small detail: while Paul Warburg, the creator of the Federal Reserve System and its first head, was part of the delegation accepting Germany's capitulation, his brother, Max Warburg, the Kaiser's banker, was signing that very capitulation.

That's how they did business.

I'll add that after the assassination in Sarajevo, the most interesting thing began. The British media and politicians sided with Austria-Hungary and supported its claims against Serbia.

Both the Austro-Hungarians and the Germans had the impression that the British were on their side.

At the same time, other diplomats went to St. Petersburg to explain to Nicholas II that he should not abandon the Serbs. Russia needed to be provoked so that Germany would respond.

Here, British Foreign Secretary Edward Grey, a member of the "Group", played a huge role. He convinced the Kaiser of neutrality. He spoke of the war as a conflict of four - Austria-Hungary and Germany on one side, and France and Russia on the other, excluding Britain.

↪️ Wilhelm believed it and declared war on Russia.

↪️ Russia ground up Germany and Austria-Hungary.

↪️ England supported Russia and became one of the main beneficiaries in the war.

When it became clear that Germany would lose, the Anglo-Saxons moved on to the Russian issue: they supported the conspiracy against Nicholas II.

*Let me remind you that the overthrow of Nicholas II was carried out by the Masons, and the main Masonic lodges were and are located in Great Britain one way or another.
I have a series of articles about the Masons - be sure to read them!

Without this support, it would hardly have happened. It is also significant that a killer from London, intelligence agent Oswald Rainer, came to kill Rasputin, who called for peace with Germany and withdrawal from the Entente.

(History) About Rasputin and his murder by British intelligence: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1670629

The First World War served as a springboard to the hegemony of the dollar.

It also became part of the Great War of the 20th century, which began with the creation of the Federal Reserve System and ended with the destruction of the Soviet Union.

The goals throughout these years were the same:
⛔️ crush Russia and
⛔️ establish Anglo-Saxon power.

The most interesting thing is that nothing has changed: these forces are still preparing the Third World War, and Russia is still a thorn in their side.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=AZBd-QRvXas

[Tintin]

Thanks. Very short version: The Rhodes Round Circle and various (other) Zionist organisations started it

[shaberon]

I think this is really important, because it is a huge change from many sovereign/independent places, to a shadowy "glue" that injects itself everywhere.

The Entente is probably one of the most dangerous ideas to ever roll out of the mind of man in this regard.

It's immediately suspicious -- France and England were basically mortal enemies for all recorded history, and suddenly they are fused as if of one mind.

But the major factor is missing from the OP -- there was one thing that stood in the way of the coming agglomeration -- the Bank of Austria.

One should consider that empire and its forty years of relative peace under Franz Ferdinand as something of a role model, practically unknown in Europe otherwise. So it had this mass of wealth and a population that was not necessarily subordinate to the business plans of the Entente.

The Bank of Austria was shattered to pieces, while the German Reichsbank hugely gained dominance. Long term? As of WWII, the Austrian Constitution prevents them from entering any alliances, which is why it is not in NATO. It is permanently neutralized because its potency and philosophy did not match the British favor.

The oldest central bank is really in Sweden, but it is Bank of England noteworthy for installing itself as "manager of national debt". This entity has been continuous since 1694, thus, the root of the problem. The US Federal Reserve is a practically line-by-line copy of the Reichsbank which was heavily studied and imitated.