Charlie Kirk assassinated, 10 Sept 2025

[pacificator]

May it is this one https://www.facebook.com/IDEALCONCEAL#
I'm not sure how accurate could be a shot fired with this.

[grapevine]

Charlie Kirk Memorial in London

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=tXcp-W17gbA

(17:05)
Tribute posted by Dr John Campbell. The haka near the beginning is both moving and fitting.

[gini]

George debunks the official narrative

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=O_koGTh6T5c

--19 min-- Sep 15, 2025 #MOATS #CharlieKirk #Israel
'You don't get to say it's antis*mitic to question whether Israel had a hand in the ass*ssination. Kirk, like Tucker Carlson, was turning away from Israel and Zionism'

[Tintin]

Posted by Arcturian108 (here)
I am quite surprised that the video that I uploaded yesterday to Project Avalon showing that Charlie was shot with a cell-phone gun are still up on the internet and have had over 600,000 views. Here is the same guy whose Twitter/X account is called "Salomondrin" giving the same information on his Twitter account in Spanish: video

Yes, so am I. I've not long ago watched it and his hypothesis does seem to have something compellingly plausible about it.

[Tintin]

Posted by Arcturian108 (here)

Posted by guayabal (here)
Interesting: This is how they shot Charlie Kirk:

https://x.com/salomondrin/status/1966255182662218099

Twitter/X doesn't make it easy to download this video, and I am still surprised that it is up on the site. Besides the evidence it presents about how Charlie was murdered, not involving the patsy that the government has picked, there is another disturbing element in this video. Who among you knew that a cell phone could also be a gun? I sure didn't. What does this mean for security in all public places from this point forward? Are security checkpoints aware of this issue? And if everyone knew of this possibility then nobody would feel safe anymore in public with people carrying around a gun that looks like a phone. Right now most governments are depending upon surveilling their populations through the universal usage of smart phones. Knowing now that these could also be guns could cause a big change in the economies of the world. And they wouldn't want that information to get out. I personally wish everyone would go back to using landlines, so that option doesn't disappear. I only use a corded landline.

For now, this man's hypothesis is pretty compelling actually. Put it this way, this might be what actually happened while everything else is a distraction.

This site allows download of 'broadcasts such as this one: https://x-downloader.com/. Some downloaders aren't configured to download /broadcasts/.

Cell-phones as guns?: well, it seems like they probably can, and we know where innovative methods for assassination/disguise tend to originate. Not to be confused with guns disguised as phones: that's a subtly different thing of course.

Man, this is like something out of a Colombo movie where a gun was triggered by a car key-lock device - Colombo Goes to College (1990) activated from a lecture theatre dozens of feet away (I digress)

[Tintin]

Um, one issue with the Salomondrin theory (above) is that he doesn't show a head shot of the young man in the white T-shirt: apparently he isn't looking at Charlie, he's looking into the crowd. He also appears to put his phone away before the hand gestures: I don't see a phone in his hands: he doesn't appear to get his phone out again, as claimed. It's still pretty odd though. (One: Two, with the hand gestures and then, bang)

And there are the acoustics. I wouldn't expect that amount of resonance from such a comparatively close range. I'm no expert on weapon acoustics but that shot is pretty damned loud.

[meat suit]

If we are considering cell phone guns, maybe the shooting device was built into his chest armour..
I think there was video disussing bullet deflection by the body armour to the neck, so its not far fetched..

[grapevine]

On GBNews this morning (Dawn Neesom), her guest said that the shooter (I'm not going to mention his name) had unsuccessfully debated Charlie Kirk in recent weeks and that it was an act of revenge. The clip is too new atm and still in the live stream, but if it becomes available tomorrow I'll post it.

[Johnnycomelately]

Posted by Tintin (here)
Um, one issue with the Salomondrin theory (above) is that he doesn't show a head shot of the young man in the white T-shirt: apparently he isn't looking at Charlie, he's looking into the crowd. He also appears to put his phone away before the hand gestures: I don't see a phone in his hands: he doesn't appear to get his phone out again, as claimed. It's still pretty odd though. (One: Two, with the hand gestures and then, bang)

And there are the acoustics. I wouldn't expect that amount of resonance from such a comparatively close range. I'm no expert on weapon acoustics but that shot is pretty damned loud.

Not clear to me too, the visuals as presented. And the acoustics seem not right, as you point out.

I’ve seen an article years ago, he says 9 years but dunno, about a disguised handgun that folds to/from a cell phone shape. Iirc, it was a single shot, and it certainly had no suppressor (he claims it had a “silencer”).

We do hear a kind of muffled bang, more like a thud, but camera is panning and doesn’t relate the timing.

Having seen pics and vid of regular suppressors, and also so-called built in suppressors, either would double the length of a handgun.

Only thing that might make sense for a quieter discharge, to my minimal knowledge, would be the use of a subsonic powder load of that cartridge. But I think that would still be loud enough to draw attention, of which there was none cast toward that hypothetical shooter. Nobody was ducking from that (shooter POV) aspect.

[ExomatrixTV]

• "These People Have Blood On Their Hands" - Konstantin Kisin

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=w5YHR4Zz-rs

If any controversy is "messy," it's mostly because "authorities" within mass media are incompetent to manage a fair, constructive debate, as their minds are already made up, their conflict resolution skills are zero to none. Hence, mass conditioning isn't just from one side pushed hard; it's the steering of "allowed narratives" that are rigged from the get-go. Yet the vast majority have no clue—or some do, but lack the stamina to do something about it.

• My Perspectives dealing with the use of the label 'Far Right' by Mainstream Media

Piers in silence because he knows he and the MSM are part of the problem. Well put Konstantin.

[Johnnycomelately]

Whatever.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Xz7_3n7xyDg

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1967481244582912410

[SilentFeathers]

Posted by Nasu (here)
Never mind the fact his dad wasn’t a twenty plus year veteran of the police, as we were told, but rather a construction worker, let’s leave that for a moment.

So I have a small something to add that gets my spidey senses tingling. As a longtime competitive shooter I’ve owned or handled more guns than most people have seen in an action movie. I wouldn’t call myself an expert because there is always someone better or wiser, but that being said, I have quite a lot of experience with firearms, let’s leave it at that.

So my observation, which I haven’t heard any talking heads mention yet, is the issue of him moving his rifle from the place he took the shot, to the woods where it was found wrapped in a towel.

Most people seem to say he hid it in his trousers which is why he limps in some footage. Ok, maybe.

But if you watch the footage of him jumping down off the roof, he clearly bends both legs as he lands, there’s no way you could land as he did with a rifle down your trousers, no way. Especially since he bends both legs.

So perhaps he disassembled the rifle. Ok, maybe.

So the rifle that was shown to us is approximately four feet long give or take. Depending on the rifle, it will have a minimum of three screws to disassemble, usually more like six to ten screws, again depending on brand. I’m just talking about bolt action rifles here. So assuming the minimum, three screws, that’s two on the trigger guard and one holding the barrel onto the stock. Again this assumption is the bare minimum for screws.

So if you take off the stock from a rifle such as this you lose about twelve to fifteen inches of overall length. So still a three foot ish barrel and trigger group to conceal. Far too long for his little rucksack.

So this chap takes his shot, starts running across the roof, stops, takes out his screwdriver, unscrews three screws and places the rifle in is his bag or trousers, despite massive adrenaline and time constraints doesn’t drop any screws, runs on and then drops fifteen feet ish to the ground, then runs to the woods, successfully escapes and then takes out his screwdriver, screws, re screws the three screws and potential barrel band and then wraps the gun in a towel, so he can abandon it.

Again, assuming the minimum of three screws.

It really doesn’t add up.

Especially when you view the footage of him dropping to the ground. His bag was too small to hide a gun of this size, even if it had been disassembled. His legs bent on impact, so no gun in his trousers.

Something very hinky about all this…….x…… N

I'm very familiar with firearms too, been shooting many guns for 50 years or so. I actually owned a Mauser 30-06 many years ago (An older version)

Personally I think it ludicrous to think this shooter dismantled a Mauser 30.06 w/scope and then reassembled it later during his getaway. I think all on his mind was getting out of dodge when he fired that shot and seen it hit his target.

This gun in the woods thing doesn't make sense.

He may of tossed it down to another person from another location on the roof than his escape route and they dumped it in the woods. Or this whole gun narrative is just intentional misleading information. Hard to say....

I first thought he may of modified this gun before this event and cut the butt off, but the pictures of the weapon don't show that (if the photos are even really the gun used).

If he had the gun strapped between his back and the backpack with the barrel stuck down his pants, it wouldn't of been past his knees. But the butt of the gun would of been sticking up above his backpack. The video footage is really grainy and blurry so I couldn't see the butt of the gun sticking up behind his head.

I'm thinking if the truth is they did find the gun in the woods, he tossed it down to someone else, or we just can't see the butt of the gun sticking up behind his head in the video. Regardless, I totally don't believe he did this by himself. It appears several people were aware that this event was going to take place before it did.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1967481244582912410

That's true. And I think it's very much a part of what's going on here.

Tyler Robinson was radicalised. He rose up. He shot Charlie Kirk. Or he was set up to do so, and maybe someone else fired that shot leaving him to take the fall. In either case, this was a planned hit. Not to silence Charlie Kirk, because that's stupid. By taking him out, they've only made him louder. All this has done is galvanise the right and recruit yet more Charlie Kirks.

This act, I believe, was designed as a provocative act by those who pull such strings -- embedded bad actors, perhaps C_I_A. Divide and conquer as previously stated in this thread.

The left have taken to the streets. They've risen up. They're already fighting. Now they want the right to do the same. Rise up, and fight back. They want fear, they want division, they want violence, they want us at each other's throats. That's what this is all about in my opinion.

At the moment, the right aren't taking the bait. Let's hope it stays that way.

https://x.com/catturd2/status/1967523902189707330

[norman]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)

https://x.com/catturd2/status/1967523902189707330

I'm not sure Charlie would approve of the candles.


edit to add:

Candle ceremonies are not godly.

[rgray222]

I somehow put this on the Best of CK thread, but it was meant to be here.

President Trump is being widely condemned in the media for not attempting to unify the country. I'm not sure if he is simply mad because someone he knew and cared about has been murdered or if he actually understands what he is doing. I hope and pray it's the latter, but it really makes no difference.

Why should Trump unite the country around evil? The person(s) responsible for killing Charlie Kirk are evil, and those who are rejoicing in his assassination are evil, . There are a massive number of people who have allowed themselves to be influenced by evil; this is the result of long-term hate. Sustained hatred is a cycle that is as difficult to break as alcoholism or drug addiction. Long-term hatred removes any possibility of clear critical thinking. While some may call it a mental health issue, I believe it is more accurately described as a spiritual illness. The cycle of hate must be broken before the country can heal. There will be a time for unification, but that time is not now.

[ExomatrixTV]

• TENS of THOUSANDS of Woke Liberals FIRED after Celebrating Charlie Kirk’s Murder!:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=-X6EbI_-kYI

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ea0VR82nK6A

[Arcturian108]

Posted by Tintin (here)

Posted by Arcturian108 (here)

Posted by guayabal (here)
Interesting: This is how they shot Charlie Kirk:

https://x.com/salomondrin/status/1966255182662218099

Twitter/X doesn't make it easy to download this video, and I am still surprised that it is up on the site. Besides the evidence it presents about how Charlie was murdered, not involving the patsy that the government has picked, there is another disturbing element in this video. Who among you knew that a cell phone could also be a gun? I sure didn't. What does this mean for security in all public places from this point forward? Are security checkpoints aware of this issue? And if everyone knew of this possibility then nobody would feel safe anymore in public with people carrying around a gun that looks like a phone. Right now most governments are depending upon surveilling their populations through the universal usage of smart phones. Knowing now that these could also be guns could cause a big change in the economies of the world. And they wouldn't want that information to get out. I personally wish everyone would go back to using landlines, so that option doesn't disappear. I only use a corded landline.

For now, this man's hypothesis is pretty compelling actually. Put it this way, this might be what actually happened while everything else is a distraction.

This site allows download of 'broadcasts such as this one: https://x-downloader.com/. Some downloaders aren't configured to download /broadcasts/.

Cell-phones as guns?: well, it seems like they probably can, and we know where innovative methods for assassination/disguise tend to originate. Not to be confused with guns disguised as phones: that's a subtly different thing of course.

Man, this is like something out of a Colombo movie where a gun was triggered by a car key-lock device - Colombo Goes to College (1990) activated from a lecture theatre dozens of feet away (I digress)

Just now I was able with your help to download the video onto my computer. So, again, thanks for that. I am also still so amazed that this video is still up on the net.

[Arcturian108]

In reading the replies to Salomondrin's video, which I shared earlier, I found this reply to be very interesting. It just points to the fact that there are a lot of exotic weapons available, and this might be what we are seeing in this video:
https://twitter.com/EddieFetherman/s...5751309http://

Here is the full text of this reply:

"A hand-held electromagnetic accelerator, aka a "rail gun", would shoot a iron/steel (magnetic) projectile, no sound, because no gunpower or cordite, and also explains the microphone magnet moving towards the projectile...

A small CO2 weapon like this would be much louder, I've fired CO2 weapons. This would only have the sound of the projectile moving through the air, not expanded CO2 gas behind it accelerating the projectile.

The "bullet" from the autopsy or lack of bullet and examining the wound would show if I'm right or not. No lead residue. No cauterized wound, I doubt it would go fast enough to heat up at that short distance.

Acceleration would be small with a small barrel of inches, but with enough power could be good enough for close range.

The guy pointing the smartphone at Kirk has the targeting app, the triggerman has on the targeting glasses connected to that application wirelessly. I imagine they could also probably be live streaming it to their buddies in another nation or elsewhere...

I saw a guy on Youtube building a assault rifle sized railgun with lithium batteries. Way smaller than our military makes.

Does that guy in the assassination video have a pack (for batteries) on his shoulder? What is he? He's security? The medic? Why the shoulder bag?

I'm just an old ****, but I'd bet someone has said, "How small can we make a rail gun?" And someone else had the reason and the money to try..."

[ExomatrixTV]

• Charlie Kirk Assassinated By Trans Terror Cell, FBI Investigating Says Report | Tim Pool:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=8HehnupZHl4

Liberals are lying, trans ideology is the likely motivator and is Moderate Democrat aligned ideology