The Fall of the House of Windsor?

[norman]

Is this a distraction from the increasingly talked about fact that Charles isn't William's father either ?

At 40, Prince Harry FINALLY Admits What We All Suspected

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=DwhJgOsf02I

[Losus4]

Do you have the exact timestamp of where Harry explicitly says Charles isn't his dad because that sounds awfully clickbaity.

[norman]

Posted by Losus4 (here)
Do you have the exact timestamp of where Harry explicitly says Charles isn't his dad because that sounds awfully clickbaity.

That isn't what he says.

This is a Royal fightback propaganda film.

He's insisting he's NOT James Hewitt's child. He may well not be ! . . but he's unlikely to be Charles' child.

This is a daft piece of prop' because DNA would sort it all out in a flash. IF they wanted to tell us the truth that's what they would do, of course.

More interesting, to me, is who William's real father is. I've heard that he was 'eugenically' bred from Diana and the then Prince of Spain. The Windsors and the Spanish Royals are fairly closely related but Diana's family is a more distant, and desirable ( for the breeders ) bloodline, which actually has a stronger claim to the British throne than either of the others.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Losus4 (here)
Do you have the exact timestamp of where Harry explicitly says Charles isn't his dad because that sounds awfully clickbaity.

It starts at 16:18 (near the end of the video), in the section titled Prince Harry Revelation.

But yes, it's clickbait. In the last minute of the video Prince Harry states that his father is Charles and that his father being James Hewitt was impossible, as he was born before Diana and Hewitt began their affair.

[norman]

I have a developing theory that could answer the question of why do the bloodline 'elite' people engage in very long term multigenerational agendas that wouldn't make sense to normies with normie life span interests to get on with. But, now is not the right time to get into it.



THE KING OF UFOs (2024) Full UFOs & Royalty Documentary

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=WlNo46GhyJI

The youtube version is now "Private". I've found a version of it at Rumble. Perhaps when you see this post the YT version will be back again. I'm leaving that link here to see what happens with that one as time goes on.


https://rumble.com/v6qqcnu-the-king-...cumentary.html


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v6oirn2/?pub=1yatds

[grapevine]

Prince Andrew: Epstein, Trump & an ASSASSINATION plot! Biographer reveals all | Palace Confidential

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=VTTauPNuBQI

(39:06)

"Acclaimed royal biographer, Andrew Lownie's first broadcast interview about his his latest bombshell book: "Entitled, the Rise and Fall of the House of York".
. Discover: the truth about the affair between Prince Philip and Sarah Ferguson's mother.
. Revealed: Andrew cheated his way through Royal Navy staff college.
. Learn: the true extent of Fergie's and Andrew's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
. Disclosed: how Andrew SHARED a mistress with Bill Clinton, plus his friendship with Donald Trump.
. Exposed: shocking assassination plot on the Prince's life.
. Unearthed: the truth behind the infamous "Newsnight" interview.
. Exposed: the Russian spy who seduced Andrew and gave him a bugged laptop."

The part about Andrew and Epstein is referenced from 20:00

[norman]

King Charles Delivers Christmas Speech 2025
The Royal Family Channel - 4 days ago

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=1fNaPPm44UY

[Inversion]

Posted by norman (here)
King Charles Delivers Christmas Speech 2025
The Royal Family Channel - 4 days ago

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=1fNaPPm44UY

At 1:32 he said he and the queen went to the Vatican (Divining Serpent). He mentioned Bethlehem and according to the late David Flynn's book Temple at the Center of Time Jesus was born on the coordinates Pix10. Satan equals Pi in Chaldean numerology. At 04:38 he quoted T.S Eliot whose name anagrams to Toilet, Test Oil & Stole It. The alien city under the Mt. Shasta is Telos converting to Stole. He said journeying forward and back in time. At 09:14 there's an image of the queen in a phone booth which resembles the Dr. Who series & the Bill & Ted movies. He said the word Pilgrimage as if there's a major impending event. This morning while I was the gym the 2014 movie X-Men: Days of Future Past was playing on FX. Those letters stand for Fox eXtended and FOX coverts to 666.

poetry

At the still point of the turning world (from The Four Quartets)

by T. S. Eliot

At the still point of the turning world. Neither flesh nor fleshless;
Neither from nor towards; at the still point, there the dance is,
But neither arrest nor movement. And do not call it fixity,
Where past and future are gathered. Neither movement from nor towards,
Neither ascent nor decline. Except for the point, the still point,
There would be no dance, and there is only the dance.

At 6:26 a man shows Trump the Club World Cup trophy that Michael Salla compares to Looking Glass technology or the device in the 1997 movie Contact.

The presenter said it represents the past, future and present. It reminds me of Trump putting his hands on the orb in 2017.

Michael Salla Material

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=iEznWnGKMbc

The key he was given resembles the one in the 1979 movie Time After Time.

link

[Brigantia]

Locals of Sandringham, where the vile (former prince) Andrew has been exiled for now, have been busy putting up these posters: Source

[onawah]

King Charles has “profound concern” over Andrew-Epstein allegations | BBC News
19.2M subscribers
Feb 9, 2026

"Buckingham Palace says King Charles has made clear his “profound concern” at allegations about the conduct of his brother Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and that he stands ready to support the police if approached.

The British police have said they are assessing suggestions that the former Prince shared confidential information with Jeffrey Epstein, during his time as the UK’s trade envoy. Mr Mountbatten-Windsor has previously apologised for his ties with Epstein but has denied wrongdoing.

Prince William, on.a visit to Saudi Arabia, has also said he is “deeply concerned” by the continuing allegations emerging from the release of the Epstein files.

Reeta Chakrabarti presents BBC News at Ten reporting by Daniela Relph. "

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=v_s-Heu1Srw

**************
New Epstein Emails Shatter Andrew's Virgina Giuffre Story/ Newsweek
Newsweek/The Royal Report
693K subscribers
Feb 9, 2026

"Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's most senior aide appears to have drafted a statement intended for Ghislaine Maxwell to release which said the former prince did meet Virginia Giuffre and had his photo taken with her—contradicting his later defence.
Andrew forwarded the message on to Jeffrey Epstein without contradicting the factual account, new emails containd in the Epstein Files and seen by Newsweek show. Andrew would later tell the BBC they had never met and that when the allegation first came to light he thought: "Well that's a bit strange, I don't remember this."
Yet, had the statement been published, it would have meant Maxwell had confirmed the meeting took place and, seemingly, also that the photo was real.
Andrew has always denied Giuffre's allegations. She sued him in 2021 accusing him of rape and he settled for an undisclosed sum while denying liability. "

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ckhw6x7FuHA

****************
Former prince Andrew shown in 'compromising' photos, emails in latest Epstein files
USA TODAY
7.46M subscribers
Feb 2, 2026

"UK leaders urge Andrew Mountbatten Windsor to testify before U.S. Congress after newly released files link him to Epstein.

Read more:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/enter...s/88466879007/ "

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=fnUb1MYiiBA

[Eric J (Viking)]

Not sure where to post this one, the plot thickens.

[Brigantia]

Posted by Eric J (Viking) (here)



Not sure where to post this one, the plot thickens.

Interesting and highly incriminating if there is truth to it: I had to look up USANYS, it's Offices of United States Attorneys.

[onawah]

“The damage it may do to Charles’s legacy” | The Royals, Epstein files & Andrew question/BBC
BBC Politics
839K subscribers
Feb 11, 2026

"Royal commentator Peter Hunt and the Financial Times's Gillian Tett discuss the growing pressure on Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor to testify in the US in relation to the Epstein files. The pair also discuss the response of the Royal Family. Interview by Victoria Derbyshire, with Newsnight Political Editor Nick Watt.
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has always denied any wrongdoing."

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=3WsAGreBFUc

[onawah]

Prosecuting Andrew Is King Charles' Only Way Out of Epstein Scandal
Newsweek
694K subscribers
Feb 14, 2026 The Royal Report

"Buckingham Palace said Monday that King Charles III would support British police as they assess reports that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly Prince Andrew, shared confidential information with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The statement followed confirmation from police that they are reviewing allegations that Mountbatten-Windsor sent trade-related reports to Epstein in 2010.

Thames Valley Police said it began examining the matter after media reports cited emails suggesting Mountbatten-Windsor provided Epstein with details from a Southeast Asia trade trip he took that year while serving as Britain’s special representative for international trade.

Representative Ro Khanna also said Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's friendship with Jeffrey Epstein could bring down the British monarchy and King Charles III "has to answer what he knew." "

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=6Nhkq64JRnk

[Le Chat]

Here's Prince Andrew's ESCAPE Plan! – Andrew Lownie

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=yGvzhQ60NPQ

[onawah]

Surrey Police Investigate SATANIC Ritual Murder in Connection with Prince Andrew – Andrew Lownie
The Daily Heretic
198K subscribers
Feb 14, 2026

"In this episode of Heretics, royal biographer Andrew Lownie returns to examine why renewed police interest in a disturbing, unresolved case has sent shockwaves through royal circles — and why Prince Andrew has reason to be deeply uncomfortable. This conversation does not assert conclusions; it interrogates questions, patterns, and why scrutiny persists whenever the Epstein network resurfaces.

Lownie sets out what is publicly known, what remains opaque, and how investigators typically approach allegations that sit at the intersection of elite privilege, intelligence sensitivities, and historical secrecy. He explains why certain claims — however contentious — continue to draw attention years later, and why law enforcement reopens lines of inquiry when new testimony, documents, or contextual links emerge. The focus here is not sensationalism, but accountability: how serious allegations are handled when those potentially implicated occupy protected positions.

The discussion then widens to Prince Andrew’s long-documented association with Jeffrey Epstein and why that relationship still casts a long shadow over the monarchy. Lownie details how Epstein’s network functioned, why influence and kompromat matter, and how reputational containment often replaces transparent investigation. He also explores Andrew’s conduct as a UK trade envoy, allegations of monetising access, and the repeated appearance of the same names across multiple inquiries — even when cases stall before court.

Crucially, Lownie breaks down why silence fuels suspicion. When institutions decline to clarify timelines, deny access to records, or manage visibility instead of evidence, public trust erodes. Why do certain stories never fully resolve? Why do some deaths remain unanswered? And why do those closest to power appear confident that consequences can be deferred indefinitely?

This episode also examines the psychological and institutional dynamics at play: the culture of deference surrounding royalty, the risk calculus for investigators, and the mechanisms used to minimise exposure. Lownie’s approach is forensic and restrained, drawing clear lines between allegation, evidence, and inference — and explaining why responsible inquiry demands all three be kept distinct.

If you want to understand why Prince Andrew remains under scrutiny, why investigators keep circling unresolved cases, and why this chapter of the Epstein scandal refuses to close, this conversation lays out the terrain clearly — without shortcuts."

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=MaeIwxEcJH4

*************

Sarah Ferguson is MISSING! – Royal Biographer Andrew Lownie
The Daily Heretic
198K subscribers
Feb 12, 2026

"Why has Sarah Ferguson seemingly vanished from public view — and why does the timing matter? In this episode of Heretics, royal biographer Andrew Lownie examines the questions swirling around the Duchess’s prolonged absence following the latest Epstein file releases, and what those documents reignited about her long-reported association with Jeffrey Epstein.

Lownie brings method, context, and caution. Rather than speculation, he explains how historians and investigators assess patterns: public appearances that stop abruptly, reputational crises that coincide with silence, and how elite figures manage exposure when uncomfortable details resurface. What does “missing” really mean in royal terms? How do press strategy, legal advice, and institutional protection shape who is seen — and who isn’t?

The conversation revisits the broader Epstein disclosures and why renewed scrutiny landed not only on Prince Andrew, but also on those within his immediate orbit. Lownie outlines what is on the record regarding Ferguson’s past contact with Epstein, including correspondence and financial entanglements previously reported, and why new document drops inevitably reopen old questions — even when no new allegations are made.

Crucially, this episode avoids sensational claims. Lownie stresses the difference between absence and evidence, explaining why responsible inquiry requires separating verified facts from inference. Why do gaps in visibility generate suspicion? Why do institutions often choose silence over clarity? And why does that strategy frequently backfire, eroding trust and fuelling curiosity?

Listeners will also hear how the monarchy historically manages reputational storms: controlled visibility, selective engagement, and the careful choreography of return. If Ferguson reappears, what will signal a reset — and what would suggest deeper issues remain unresolved? If she doesn’t, what does that communicate to a public already wary of opacity?

This is a sober, forensic look at power, image, and accountability in the shadow of the Epstein scandal. No verdicts. No shortcuts. Just disciplined analysis of why the absence of a high-profile royal, at this particular moment, continues to raise eyebrows — and why transparency matters more than ever. "

****************
Freemasons Protected Andy! Royal Family Fergie Mandelson in Epstein Files! Shaun Attwood and The Lownie Report
Streamed live on Feb 8, 2026

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=LrPl59T8vTQ

**************

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=lG3GXlWFOMI

*********

Here's Prince Andrew's ESCAPE Plan! – Andrew Lownie
The Daily Heretic
198K subscribers
Feb 12, 2026

"Is Prince Andrew preparing to leave Britain — and if so, where would he go, and why? In this episode of Heretics, royal biographer Andrew Lownie explores growing speculation around the Duke of York’s future and the possibility that he could relocate abroad as pressure continues to mount over his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

Lownie is careful to separate verified facts from informed speculation. He explains why rumours about Andrew leaving the UK persist, and why certain destinations are repeatedly mentioned in private discussions. According to Lownie, the issue isn’t whether a move is imminent, but why the idea feels plausible at all — and what that says about the handling of the scandal so far.

The conversation revisits the unresolved questions surrounding Andrew’s conduct, including his continued association with Epstein after conviction and the institutional reluctance to pursue full legal scrutiny. Lownie argues that the absence of a clear legal reckoning has fuelled public suspicion, creating an environment where talk of exile feels like a logical next step rather than far-fetched gossip.

We examine why the Middle East is often raised in these conversations. Lownie outlines how wealth, privacy, and legal complexity can make certain jurisdictions attractive to high-profile figures seeking distance from scrutiny. He does not allege criminal intent or flight from justice, but asks why safeguards appear so weak that such speculation has been allowed to flourish unchecked.

The episode also explores the monarchy’s dilemma. Lownie explains why a courtroom trial involving a senior royal was always unlikely, and how reputation management has consistently taken precedence over transparency. He argues that without a clear process to establish accountability, uncertainty fills the gap — damaging trust not just in individuals, but in the institution itself.

Importantly, this discussion avoids sensational claims. It focuses on risk, perception, and consequence. Lownie explains how historians assess these moments: patterns of avoidance, institutional behaviour, and the stories that emerge when official clarity is absent. Whether Andrew stays or goes, Lownie contends, the underlying issue remains unresolved.

Why does this matter now? Because public confidence is already fragile. When powerful figures appear insulated from scrutiny, cynicism grows. Lownie argues that openness — not silence — is the only way to end speculation and restore credibility.

This episode doesn’t predict the future. It asks why the present has produced so many unanswered questions — and why the idea of departure has become part of the conversation at all.

If you want to understand how power responds under pressure, and why rumours gain traction when accountability stalls, this is an essential, evidence-led discussion."

Posted by Le Chat (here)
Here's Prince Andrew's ESCAPE Plan! – Andrew Lownie
https://youtube.com/watch?v=yGvzhQ60NPQ

[onawah]

A broken, finished man" | King's friend on "duty of care" Charles feels for Andrew
BBC Politics
840K subscribers
Feb 16, 2026

"King Charles's biographer and friend Jonathan Dimbleby tells BBC Newsnight's Katie Razzall that he "would strongly believe" that the monarch "would very much like" his brother Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor to testify in the US in relation to convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Interview broadcast on Friday 13th February 2026.

When asked whether the King would be feeling "pressure" over the allegations, Dimbleby said: "I think that he will be feeling the pain of this" and be "appalled by the allegations".

Dimbleby added that Charles would be "sensing the need to give duty of care" to Mountbatten-Windsor, describing Andrew as "a broken, finished man at best".

Last week, Buckingham Palace said it was ready to support the police as they consider allegations against Mountbatten-Windsor.

Mountbatten-Windsor has consistently and strenuously denied any wrongdoing."

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=iZd04QaUs-U

******************


‘The King Will FALL’ | Andrew Was “ALLOWED” Inappropriate Behaviour | He Can ‘Flee’ Britain
TalkTV
1.39M subscribers
Feb 17, 2026

"Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s time as a trade envoy should be investigated for possible corruption, a former business secretary has said.

Documents released by the US Department of Justice appeared to show the former prince sharing confidential reports from his role as the UK’s trade envoy with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein."

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ccy-Q1ZnYQg

***********

If Andrew flees to a foreign country with no extradition agreement with the UK, and is beholden to his hosts there for accommodations, etc. (since he reportedly has no real money of his own) then what would prevent him from sharing more state secrets, which apparently he has already done (with Epstein, China)?
Andrew is clearly a narcissist with little in the way of moral scruples, and the situation appears to be getting very serious for the royals.
It seems unlikely he will be made to go to the US to testify which could presumably result in actual jail time.
A jailed royal would certainly be unprecedented, but perhaps some kind of permanent house arrest with 24/7 observation of Andrew would be the alternative.
It would save the royals from further embarrassment caused by Andrew, and keep him in the UK, and satisfy to some extent at least the growing calls for justice.
With the growing dissatisfaction of the Brits with their government, is it likely that enough of the public will be calling for the abdication of the royals, which historically seems to be who they fall back on when the politicians have become too intractable?
Not being a Brit (I'm American), I'm not sure I'm reading this whole situation correctly, but it's something I'm curious about since the whole concept of "royalty" has always seemed so bizarre to me.

[onawah]

Andrew Faces Possible Criminal Probe As Seven Police Forces Examine Epstein Files
Times Royals
2.81K subscribers
Feb 18, 2026

“Andrew has always said that he would co-operate with the authorities. We haven’t seen that happen yet, have we?”

Seven police forces are examining the Epstein files, including reviewing up to 90 flights that reportedly landed at Stansted on Epstein’s so-called “Lolita Express”, says Sarah Hewson, royal correspondent.

Sarah Hewson was speaking to Kate McCann and Calum Macdonald on Times Radio Breakfast. ."

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=HXGI5gvapVQ

[Eric J (Viking)]

WOW…I couldn’t find anything on mainstream yet…..but Police arrest Andrew on birthday following Epstein scandal.

More here…. https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/andrew...ein-5HjdSYh_2/

[Eric J (Viking)]

Police arrest Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor on his 66th birthday

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has been arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office, Thames Valley Police have confirmed.

Police vehicles were spotted arriving at the Sandringham estate in Norfolk this morning, where Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is currently residing on his 66th birthday.

Witnesses at the scene reported that those who arrived were wearing civilian clothing but "appeared to be police officers".

Thames Valley police, said in a statement confirming the arrest: "As part of the investigation, we have today (19/2) arrested a man in his sixties from Norfolk on suspicion of misconduct in public office and are carrying out searches at addresses in Berkshire and Norfolk.

The man remains in police custody at this time.

"We will not be naming the arrested man, as per national guidance. Please also remember that this case is now active so care should be taken with any publication to avoid being in contempt of court."

Assistant Chief Constable Oliver Wright said: "Following a thorough assessment, we have now opened an investigation into this allegation of misconduct in public office.

"It is important that we protect the integrity and objectivity of our investigation as we work with our partners to investigate this alleged offence.

"We understand the significant public interest in this case, and we will provide updates at the appropriate time."

I bet he’s sweating now. !

Further reading…

https://www.gbnews.com/royal/andrew-...-police-latest