+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: The Plasma Individual and the Sun

  1. Link to Post #21
    Sweden Avalon Member Rawhide68's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th May 2017
    Age
    57
    Posts
    922
    Thanks
    2,489
    Thanked 6,021 times in 868 posts

    Default Re: The Plasma Individual and the Sun

    Thanks for sharing, I downloded a copy of the PDF, it looks very over my head so to speak.
    It's safe on my hard drive in Europe anyhow. I will look into it

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Rawhide68 For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (2nd March 2026), shaberon (28th February 2026), ThePythonicCow (27th February 2026)

  3. Link to Post #22
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    1st April 2016
    Posts
    6,619
    Thanks
    34,431
    Thanked 37,748 times in 6,269 posts

    Default Re: The Plasma Individual and the Sun

    Quote Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
    Robert Distinti is reworking the matrix algebra underlying electromagnetic theories, repairing a couple of flaws, and improving their fidelity to spinning (vortrix) motion in multiple dimensions, with his Vortrix Algebra.

    This sounds like a fairly good proposition of why a more accurate result might be deducible:


    Quote The existing vector products (Dot Product and Cross Product) produce ambiguous results which do not contain enough information to invert the operation (to divide). What Many have failed to realize is that the legacy cross product is only valid in 3 dimensional systems.


    The overall thesis is Ethereal Mechanics using Electrogravity, characterized as:


    Quote Matter and the Forces of Nature are derived from Ether (Ethonics) and Precursory Matter (Pretonics).


    This is the reason for creating a faster-than-light spaceship:


    Quote On a lark, I did a sustainable estimate of the Earth and determined that we can only sustain 20% of present world population (80% reduction) if OIL runs out. But the quality of life would not be worth living. So a 90% reduction would be comfortable and give more margin. After this video was made, the UN finally published their estimates for Agenda 21 which require a 75% reduction for sustainability. Most people completely miss the point of this video. It is NOT ABOUT ENERGY or SPACE TO HOUSE PEOPLE. Its about FOOD PRODUCTION. We can only sustain present population levels because of the 10 fold improvement in food production resulting from chemicals and products derived from crude oil (using OIL for energy is a waste). The products include Fertilizer, Pesticides, Preservatives, Packaging, Refrigerants, Antibiotics, Antiseptics, etc. Some products help improve yield, other products reduce waste from spoilage or vermin.

    That part I suppose is true, give or take the actual moment of Peak Oil.

    I just look at that as yes, some of you will go back to wood-based fire for energy and the hand tools you can make with it.

    Eventually the earth will reproduce the oil.


    The mathematics are supposed to be "inclusive", that is, it satisfies Quaternions, Relativity, Four Forces, and so on, while actually having a larger explanation that those become special cases of.

    Taking Spin into consideration seems to be an important way of thinking, since all particles have it, and plasma structures have a geometrical tendency.

    I would say that states of clairvoyance can sometimes deliver a parabolic, dual vortex, or toroidal environment. An experience of Non-Euclidian, curved space, where a triangle can have three ninety-degree angles.


    The Sphere has Eight ninety-degree triangles:






    I didn't post a lot of the psychedelic wallpaper and fractal art because these experiences are in flat or spherical geometry.


    What I am talking about is in Hyperbolic Geometry


    Quote As mentioned, in hyperbolic surfaces the corners of triangles add up to less than 180 degrees, so you can fit more than 6 corners of equilateral triangles at one point (and depending on the curvature of the space, you can fit up to an infinite number of them).

    Saddle shape:





    Anecdotally, this experience is very rare with psilocybin or LSD, and is mainly experienced as a super high dose of DMT.

    I didn't know that. I thought it was more real or this is where you are than normal waking consciousness, which is almost exclusively flat and spherical. There are not many natural analogues, such as kale is hyperbolic.

    I would suggest you are in a negative curvature that is spinning.

    Some examples are also on this page. Of course one can find Reddit where people are not high and have effects. And cumulatively, the tendency is to call this another dimension.

    It's not, it's the third dimension in negative curvature, and, it can be experienced.

























    The semantic argument I would make, if, say, one experiences this on the astral plane, it's not another dimension. It's another form of matter that is not physical, but it is still volume whose contents change over time.



    Coltrane's geometry of music:





    happens to look like one of Distini's Pretons.

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to shaberon For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (2nd March 2026), Chip (5th March 2026), ThePythonicCow (28th February 2026)

  5. Link to Post #23
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    78
    Posts
    30,728
    Thanks
    37,463
    Thanked 154,251 times in 23,597 posts

    Default Re: The Plasma Individual and the Sun

    Quote Posted by shaberon (here)
    And cumulatively, the tendency is to call this another dimension.

    It's not, it's the third dimension in negative curvature, and, it can be experienced.
    In my view, the spinning vortices of fields, energy and matter are not a manifestation of a more intriguing geometry, but rather I think that all that our present day conventional physics considers, including matter, light, gravity and electromagnetic fields, and their spins, vortices, and geometries, are formed from an underlying ęther. That ęther spins and flows and thereby forms all of that which the conventional physics of our time considers.

    I expect the mathematical tools needed to model the dynamics of this ęther will be potentially quite elegant. Distinti's vortrix algebra (which he has continued to refine since what I linked above) is the closest I've seen so far to what I anticipate here.

    Quote It's another form of matter that is not physical, but it is still volume whose contents change over time.
    Yes - perhaps we agree, though we might prefer different means to articulate our intuitions.
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (2nd March 2026)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts