+ Reply to Thread
Page 25 of 25 FirstFirst 1 15 25
Results 481 to 493 of 493

Thread: Ivermectin

  1. Link to Post #481
    Avalon Member Ravenlocke's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th September 2011
    Posts
    29,827
    Thanks
    16,178
    Thanked 237,697 times in 29,810 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    Nicolas Hulscher, MPH


    Feb 4
    IVERMECTIN WORKS.

    105 studies with 200,000+ patients prove it:

    ☠️ Mortality ↓ 47%
    🏥 Hospitalization ↓ 34%
    📉 Cases ↓ 81%
    🧬 Viral clearance ↑ 42%
    💪 Recovery ↑ 38%

    But sure... "It’s just horse paste."

    https://x.com/NicHulscher/status/2019082918535061977

    "Hope is the thing with feathers that perches in the soul and sings the tune without the words and never stops at all."
    - - - - Emily Elizabeth Dickinson. 🪶💜

  2. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Ravenlocke For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (9th February 2026), Ewan (9th February 2026), Forest Denizen (7th March 2026), Harmony (9th February 2026), Hym (8th March 2026), Yoda (1st October 2026)

  3. Link to Post #482
    United States Administrator Sue (Ayt)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd December 2016
    Language
    English
    Posts
    3,781
    Thanks
    38,881
    Thanked 27,254 times in 3,481 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    Several US States have quietly enacted bills that allow ivermectin to be sold over-the-counter without a prescription.
    This trend started in 2025, and there are many states with legislation in the works.

    Below is what google AI says when asked:

    As of early 2026, several U.S. states have enacted laws to make human-grade ivermectin available over the counter (OTC) or through a pharmacist standing order, bypassing the standard requirement for an individual doctor's prescription.

    States Where Ivermectin is Available OTC
    The following states have officially signed legislation allowing OTC or standing-order access:
    Tennessee: The first state to authorize human use of ivermectin as suitable for OTC purchase (since 2022).
    Arkansas: Enacted legislation in early 2025 to allow OTC sales in pharmacies.
    Idaho: Authorized OTC sales in April 2025; it is available behind the pharmacy counter similarly to other restricted OTC drugs.
    Louisiana: Allows access through a pharmacist-managed standing order, often requiring a risk assessment and information sheet.
    Texas: Legislation went into effect on December 4, 2025, allowing Texans to request ivermectin directly from a pharmacist.

    Many other states have introduced bills as recently as early 2026 to follow this trend:
    Florida: A "Medical Freedom" bill was introduced in February 2026 that would allow pharmacists to dispense it without a prescription.
    Utah & Arizona: Lawmakers introduced similar proposals in February 2026.
    New Hampshire, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Missouri: These states have seen various legislative efforts throughout 2025 and 2026 to reclassify the drug.
    "We're all bozos on this bus"

  4. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Sue (Ayt) For This Post:

    Ba-ba-Ra (11th February 2026), Bill Ryan (10th February 2026), Ewan (10th February 2026), Forest Denizen (7th March 2026), Harmony (10th February 2026), Hym (8th March 2026), onawah (10th February 2026), rgray222 (10th February 2026), Yoda (1st October 2026)

  5. Link to Post #483
    Avalon Member Eric J (Viking)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    16th March 2010
    Location
    Stockbridge Hampshire UK
    Posts
    4,981
    Thanks
    15,760
    Thanked 28,054 times in 3,466 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    Hi Avalonians…

    So one of my dear friends has had breast cancer a few years back and now she has secondary cancer in her stomach…

    I just wondered if anyone out there knows if Ivermectin would be of any help?

    Ps update. I’ve read quite a few posts here and also what I’ve read elsewhere, but thought maybe if someone had first hand info on this. 🤷‍♂️
    Last edited by Eric J (Viking); 7th March 2026 at 18:02.
    You decide...your thoughts..your actions..your reality.
    Choose well.
    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...are-the-change

  6. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Eric J (Viking) For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (7th March 2026), DNA (7th March 2026), Ewan (8th March 2026), Forest Denizen (7th March 2026), Hym (8th March 2026), Ravenlocke (7th March 2026), ThePythonicCow (7th March 2026), wondering (7th March 2026), Yoda (1st October 2026)

  7. Link to Post #484
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    40,125
    Thanks
    297,697
    Thanked 530,871 times in 38,665 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    Quote Posted by Eric J (Viking) (here)
    Hi Avalonians…

    So one of my dear friends has had breast cancer a few years back and now she has secondary cancer in her stomach…

    I just wondered if anyone out there knows if Ivermectin would be of any help?

    Ps update. I’ve read quite a few posts here and also what I’ve read elsewhere, but thought maybe if someone had first hand info on this. 🤷‍♂️
    Eric, do please see this important and valuable thread:
    There's a treasure trove of information there about how Fenbendazole plus Ivermectin has resulted in many documented cancer-curing 'miracles'. All the protocols, dosages, etc are there on the thread. The thread is also public, so your friend can easily read it all for herself.

    And also! Please do ask any questions on that thread, as we have a few members with some experience and knowledge about this.

  8. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    cursichella1 (7th March 2026), DNA (7th March 2026), Eric J (Viking) (8th March 2026), Ewan (8th March 2026), Forest Denizen (7th March 2026), Hym (8th March 2026), Ravenlocke (7th March 2026), ThePythonicCow (7th March 2026), wondering (8th March 2026), Yoda (8th March 2026)

  9. Link to Post #485
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    15th April 2023
    Posts
    857
    Thanks
    2,384
    Thanked 7,113 times in 854 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    Quote Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
    Quote Posted by Eric J (Viking) (here)
    Hi Avalonians…

    So one of my dear friends has had breast cancer a few years back and now she has secondary cancer in her stomach…

    I just wondered if anyone out there knows if Ivermectin would be of any help?

    Ps update. I’ve read quite a few posts here and also what I’ve read elsewhere, but thought maybe if someone had first hand info on this. 🤷‍♂️
    Eric, do please see this important and valuable thread:
    There's a treasure trove of information there about how Fenbendazole plus Ivermectin has resulted in many documented cancer-curing 'miracles'. All the protocols, dosages, etc are there on the thread. The thread is also public, so your friend can easily read it all for herself.

    And also! Please do ask any questions on that thread, as we have a few members with some experience and knowledge about this.
    Don't forget the book; it's in the library.

  10. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Szymon For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (8th March 2026), Eric J (Viking) (8th March 2026), Ewan (8th March 2026), gini (2nd October 2026), Hym (8th March 2026), Ravenlocke (7th March 2026), ThePythonicCow (7th March 2026), Yoda (8th March 2026)

  11. Link to Post #486
    Avalon Member Ravenlocke's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th September 2011
    Posts
    29,827
    Thanks
    16,178
    Thanked 237,697 times in 29,810 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    Quote Posted by Eric J (Viking) (here)
    Hi Avalonians…

    So one of my dear friends has had breast cancer a few years back and now she has secondary cancer in her stomach…

    I just wondered if anyone out there knows if Ivermectin would be of any help?

    Ps update. I’ve read quite a few posts here and also what I’ve read elsewhere, but thought maybe if someone had first hand info on this. 🤷‍♂️
    Hi Eric J Viking,

    I am posting the following here and hope it also helps. Fenbendazole and / or Mebendazole have been used in protocol treatments along with Ivermectin for various types of cancers.



    Commentary account
    🚨 Dr. William Makis MD – Cancer Protocol A powerful protocol using Ivermectin + Fenbendazole for remission, aggressive cancer, and poor prognosis.

    📌 Ivermectin
    – 0.5–2.5mg/kg/day based on cancer severity
    – Proven results: prostate, ovarian, gallbladder, brain cancer
    – No long-term side effects (even at high doses)

    📌 Fenbendazole
    – 222–1000mg/day (6 days/week)
    – Add: CBD, Curcumin, Milk Thistle
    – Supports liver/kidney health

    🧪 Real case studies.
    📷 Full dosage chart below

    https://x.com/Ivermectinkart/status/2022739869592883431




    And this,




    Ivermectin Shop | Ivermectincure |

    Feb 23
    After a year of intensive research, Dr. William Makis presents the most critical graph of his career: the ivermectin dosing schedule for cancer.

    @_Ivermectincure


    According to Dr. Makis, for most cancers—including breast, colon, lung, pancreatic, renal, gastric, and leukemias—a starting dose of 1 mg per kg of body weight per day is recommended.

    For a 60 kg individual, this equates to 60 mg daily:

    Five 12 mg pills

    Or 6 ml of liquid (approximately one teaspoon plus 1 ml)

    The evidence for efficacy is compelling and dose-dependent:

    Dr. Shankara Chetty observed a prostate cancer patient’s PSA drop from 89 to 11 on 45 mg/day.

    A case from Dr. Tess Lawry showed CA125 (an ovarian cancer marker) drop from 288 to 22 on just 0.2 mg/kg.

    A long-term Castro study on children with leukemia reported no side effects after six months at 1 mg/kg.

    For aggressive cancers (e.g., pancreatic or brain), the blood-brain barrier may require higher doses. Dr. Makis cites:

    Dr. Landrito’s colleague with terminal gallbladder cancer: cancer disappeared after 14 months at 2 mg/kg/day.

    The highest documented dose is 2.5 mg/kg (Dr. Chetty), with only transient visual side effects that resolved.

    Mainstream oncology does not offer this treatment. Why? Ivermectin is generic, off-patent, and unprofitable, meaning there are no funded clinical trials.

    Dr. Makis’s powerful conclusion:
    "Using ivermectin in cancer is honestly very straightforward. It is a very, very safe drug."
    His strong suggestion for those struggling: start at 1 mg/kg/day. It can be taken for many months—even over a year—with an excellent safety profile based on long-term anecdotal evidence.

    The power to fight may already be on your shelf.


    https://x.com/_Ivermectincure/status...72560447361514

    Last edited by Ravenlocke; 7th March 2026 at 22:42.
    "Hope is the thing with feathers that perches in the soul and sings the tune without the words and never stops at all."
    - - - - Emily Elizabeth Dickinson. 🪶💜

  12. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Ravenlocke For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (8th March 2026), Eric J (Viking) (8th March 2026), Ewan (8th March 2026), ExomatrixTV (17th August 2026), gini (2nd October 2026), Harmony (7th March 2026), Hym (8th March 2026), ThePythonicCow (7th March 2026), Yoda (8th March 2026)

  13. Link to Post #487
    Avalon Member Ravenlocke's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th September 2011
    Posts
    29,827
    Thanks
    16,178
    Thanked 237,697 times in 29,810 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    William Makis

    Feb 10
    So I endured two years of daily attacks, smears and abuse 😃

    and look at this:

    "National Cancer Institute Launches Preclinical Study on Ivermectin as Potential Cancer Treatment"

    Good to know I was two years ahead of my time! 😉

    We're going to do HUMAN TRIALS in FLORIDA btw...

    https://x.com/MakisMedicine/status/2021358726779904300

    "Hope is the thing with feathers that perches in the soul and sings the tune without the words and never stops at all."
    - - - - Emily Elizabeth Dickinson. 🪶💜

  14. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Ravenlocke For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (8th March 2026), Eric J (Viking) (8th March 2026), Ewan (8th March 2026), ExomatrixTV (17th August 2026), Harmony (7th March 2026), Hym (8th March 2026), Sue (Ayt) (8th March 2026), ThePythonicCow (7th March 2026), wondering (8th March 2026), Yoda (8th March 2026)

  15. Link to Post #488
    Avalon Member Ravenlocke's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th September 2011
    Posts
    29,827
    Thanks
    16,178
    Thanked 237,697 times in 29,810 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    Dr William makis MD

    NEW ARTICLE: IVERMECTIN and MEBENDAZOLE Testimonial

    - 62 year old Maryland woman with Stage 2 Gastric Cancer reports after 3 months - Johns Hopkins Oncologists don't know about their own Mebendazole PATENT!! 🤯 Cancer patients are benefiting!!

    #Ivermectin #oncologist #Mebendazole

    https://x.com/makismediciner/status/2030709634940510212

    "Hope is the thing with feathers that perches in the soul and sings the tune without the words and never stops at all."
    - - - - Emily Elizabeth Dickinson. 🪶💜

  16. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Ravenlocke For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (9th March 2026), Ewan (9th March 2026), ExomatrixTV (17th August 2026), gini (2nd October 2026), Harmony (10th March 2026), wondering (9th March 2026), Yoda (1st October 2026)

  17. Link to Post #489
    Avalon Member Frankie Pancakes's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th March 2012
    Location
    Absurdistan
    Posts
    625
    Thanks
    1,069
    Thanked 6,132 times in 618 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    We have completed the largest real-world human analysis to date evaluating ivermectin and mebendazole in cancer patients — and the results represent one of the most compelling clinical signals ever documented for repurposed anti-parasitic therapies in oncology.

    The manuscript is now available as a preprint on the Zenodo research repository, operated by the European Organization for Nuclear Research, while undergoing peer review at leading oncology journals: "Real-World Clinical Outcomes of Ivermectin and Mebendazole in Cancer Patients: Results from a Prospective Observational Cohort."

    We analyzed a prospective observational cohort of 197 cancer patients, with 122 completing structured follow-up at approximately six months (61.9% response rate). Patients were prescribed a compounded ivermectin-mebendazole protocol by licensed U.S. providers, and outcomes were collected through standardized digital surveys assessing cancer status, adherence, and safety.

    Each capsule contained 25 mg ivermectin and 250 mg mebendazole, with dosing individualized by clinicians — most commonly 1-2 capsules per day, though a subset of patients used higher daily dosing or cyclic regimens depending on disease status and tolerance.

    Conclusion

    This first-ever real-world analysis of a ivermectin-mebendazole protocol in human cancer patients provides a compelling signal that demands serious attention. While these findings should be interpreted appropriately as hypothesis-generating evidence from a real-world clinical evaluation, the magnitude, internal consistency, and broad distribution of the observed effects cannot be ignored. We are not observing marginal changes or isolated responses — we are observing widespread self-reported disease control across a diverse cancer population, a substantial proportion of patients reporting complete disappearance of detectable cancer, and sustained adherence with favorable tolerability over time.

    Taken together, these results challenge the long-standing assumption that meaningful cancer responses must come exclusively from high-cost, high-toxicity therapeutic approaches. A signal of this magnitude — approaching 50% regression or no evidence of disease in a real-world population — would typically trigger immediate large-scale clinical investment if it originated from a novel, patent-protected pharmaceutical agent. Instead, these findings involve repurposed, low-cost drugs that have existed for decades, raising a fundamental question: how many clinically meaningful signals have been overlooked, deprioritized, or never pursued because they fall outside the conventional commercial drug development model?

    This analysis does not close the case — but it decisively opens it in a way that can no longer be dismissed. The implications are clear. Prospective, randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to validate these findings, define optimal treatment strategies, and determine the full clinical potential of this protocol. Given the strength of the signal observed here, advancing this line of investigation is no longer optional — it is necessary.


    https://www.sott.net/article/505613-...-or-Regression

  18. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Frankie Pancakes For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (8th April 2026), Ewan (9th April 2026), ExomatrixTV (17th August 2026), gini (2nd October 2026), grapevine (8th April 2026), Harmony (8th April 2026), mountain_jim (2nd August 2026), onawah (9th April 2026), Ravenlocke (8th April 2026), Sue (Ayt) (9th April 2026), Szymon (8th April 2026), ThePythonicCow (10th April 2026), Yoda (1st October 2026)

  19. Link to Post #490
    UK Avalon Member
    Join Date
    2nd January 2011
    Location
    In the playground
    Language
    English
    Posts
    3,073
    Thanks
    40,974
    Thanked 23,922 times in 2,961 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    Ivermectin sabotaged

    I think we all know the reason why ivermectin was sabotaged during the pandemic, ie. because Big Pharma wouldn't have made any money out of a generic product. However, it must be acknowledged that the advice on the NHS website during the pandemic was to take paracetemol, which is also a generic product. The conclusion then points to ivermectin being an effective treatment for covid, whereas paracetamol falls short.

    As for Fauci, he must have known all this would eventually come out and so I wonder what his reward was?
    "Is there an idea more radical in the history of the human race than turning your children over to total strangers whom you know nothing about, and having those strangers work on your child's mind, out of your sight, for a period of twelve years?" John Taylor Gatto

  20. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to grapevine For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (2nd August 2026), Ewan (4th August 2026), ExomatrixTV (2nd August 2026), gini (2nd October 2026), Harmony (2nd August 2026), mountain_jim (2nd August 2026), onawah (18th August 2026), ThePythonicCow (3rd August 2026), Yoda (1st October 2026)

  21. Link to Post #491
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    60
    Posts
    30,198
    Thanks
    45,292
    Thanked 169,133 times in 28,216 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin


    source
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  22. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Agape (30th September 2026), Bill Ryan (29th September 2026), gini (2nd October 2026), Harmony (18th August 2026), onawah (18th August 2026), Sunny (17th August 2026), truthseek (17th August 2026), Yoda (30th September 2026)

  23. Link to Post #492
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    60
    Posts
    30,198
    Thanks
    45,292
    Thanked 169,133 times in 28,216 posts

    Lightbulb Re: Ivermectin


    source

    A shocking testimony by lawyer Ralph Lorigo on Monday during a hearing organized by US Senator Ron Johnson. The figures Lorigo presented are downright shocking — and raise serious questions about the decisions hospitals made while patients were on their deathbeds.
    • What happened behind the hospital doors?
    Senator Johnson gave doctors, nurses, survivors, and bereaved families a platform to share what they experienced during the pandemic. The message emerging from these testimonies is one of frustrated families, ignored treatment wishes, and deadly protocols imposed from above.
    • Lorigo: the lawyer who fought for treatment
    Ralph Lorigo, a lawyer with fifty years of experience, recounted how he was flooded with requests for help from the very beginning of the pandemic. Families begged him to persuade judges to force hospitals to treat their loved ones with ivermectin, a drug that was categorically rejected by a large part of the medical community and the government — without any significant debate. Lorigo represented a total of 212 families spread across 40 American states. He worked seven days a week. His motivation was simple: he believed that lives could be saved.
    • The figures no one wants to hear
    In 72 of the 212 cases, Lorigo managed to convince a judge: the patients were administered ivermectin. Of those 72 people, 69 survived. That is a success rate of 95.8 percent. In the remaining 140 cases — the cases he lost or where he could not reach the court quickly enough — patients had to make do with the standard hospital protocol. In many cases, that protocol included remdesivir, a drug recommended by US health authorities but whose effectiveness and safety were disputed by doctors early on.
    The result in those 140 cases? They all died. We are talking about people here. Fathers, mothers, children.
    • International doctors who did it differently
    Lorigo worked closely with the International COVID Summit, an initiative based in Rome where 25 doctors from around the world met weekly. Those doctors testified unanimously: those who treated early with hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin lost hardly any patients. These were protocols that were indeed applied in many countries outside the Western mainstream — and which were deliberately ignored or actively opposed in the United States and Europe, among others. A central figure in this story is Dr. Pierre Kory, who provided Lorigo with legally usable statements that actually convinced judges. Kory was available day and night. His efforts saved many lives.
    • Big Pharma, government pressure, and medical freedom
    Lorigo's message is clear: this is about who determines which treatment a patient receives. The government? Big Pharma? Or the patient themselves, together with their doctor? According to Lorigo, the pharmaceutical industry had an excessive grip on medical policy during the pandemic — with deadly consequences for those who wanted to go off the beaten path.
    • dutch 🇳🇱 (+ Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 29th September 2026 at 19:39.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  24. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (29th September 2026), Bluegreen (1st October 2026), Ewan (30th September 2026), gini (2nd October 2026), Harmony (2nd October 2026), onawah (29th September 2026), Sue (Ayt) (29th September 2026), Sunny (1st October 2026), ThePythonicCow (30th September 2026), Yoda (30th September 2026)

  25. Link to Post #493
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    60
    Posts
    30,198
    Thanks
    45,292
    Thanked 169,133 times in 28,216 posts

    Exclamation Re: Ivermectin


    source

    This week, U.S. Senator Ron Johnson hosted a roundtable discussion on hospital protocols during the coronavirus pandemic. Gail Seiler, a woman from Texas, shared a horror story and testified about what she describes as a systematic attempt to let her die — solely because she was not vaccinated against COVID-19.
    • A death sentence upon entry
    In December 2021, Gail presented herself at a local hospital in Texas with severe COVID symptoms. She had deliberately chosen this hospital because politician Allen West had previously been treated there with ivermectin, budesonide, and hydroxychloroquine. What followed exceeded her worst expectations. The moment an ICU doctor heard that she was not vaccinated, he looked at her and said: “I am sorry, Ms. Seiler, but you are going to die.” From that moment on, her treatment was structured as if her death were a foregone conclusion.
    • Treatments refused, dangerous protocols imposed
    Gail's requests for ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, budesonide, zinc, and vitamin C were consistently denied. Instead, she was put under severe pressure to accept remdesivir and allow herself to be ventilated — while she was fully conscious and able to speak. She refused sedatives for fear that she would lose consciousness and no longer be able to defend herself. For twelve days, she received no food. For seven days, no water. She was left naked and uncovered while nurses watched her from behind a window instead of entering her room. Against her will, she was marked as DNR — do not resuscitate.
    • Faith as a means of blackmail
    One of the most shocking details of her testimony concerns her Catholic faith. She requested access to a priest for the sacrament of anointing of the sick. The hospital management set one condition: she had to accept a dose of remdesivir first. Convinced that she might die, she agreed to that single dose — after which her priest was allowed to come. After he left, she refused further doses. The faith of a dying woman was used by the hospital as leverage. Let that sink in for a moment.
    • A six-hour hostage situation
    Brad Seiler, her husband, a former emergency nurse, raised the alarm. After twelve days, he decided to get his wife out of the hospital himself. He entered the ICU when the guard was briefly away and the doors were open. When he refused to leave without Gail, the hospital called the police. What should have been a discharge from the hospital turned into a six-hour siege. Gail was conscious, mentally competent, and wanted to go home. She asked the police aloud: “Am I a patient or a prisoner?” Eventually, with the intervention of West and Texas Senator Bob Hall, the couple was allowed to leave. But not through the main entrance. They were led through the goods elevator normally used to transport bodies to the morgue. At the exit, a nurse said to Brad: “Mark my words — she will be dead tonight, or before you get home.”
    • Healing at home with what the hospital refused
    Brad and his daughter Angela took over the care completely. Under the supervision of doctor Richard Bartlett, they used budesonide, ivermectin, antibiotics, and vitamin supplements. Without an ICU, without equipment. Within 48 hours, Gail's oxygen requirement dropped significantly. Within thirty days, she was completely off oxygen. Within sixty days, she was back at work. Today she is healthy and spends time with her children and grandchildren.
    • Financial incentives as the driving force behind the protocols
    Unfortunately, Gail’s story is not an isolated case. During earlier testimony, attorney Tom Renz exposed a shocking system: hospitals received higher fees the more interventions they performed. More COVID admissions meant more money. Administering Remdesivir yielded a bonus. Ventilating even more. And the death of a patient also yielded a financial benefit. The CMS—the U.S. Centers for Medical Reimbursements—had set up a system in which hospitals were rewarded at every step of the protocol, regardless of whether that step helped or harmed the patient. Renz put it unequivocally: “We encouraged the murder of patients instead of treatment.”
    • The system that does not want to listen
    The abuse Gail experienced is a symptom of a broader disease: a system in which protocols are sacred, financial interests drive medical decisions, and individual patients are reduced to statistics. Brad Seiler put it sharply: as a nurse, you must never stop seeing the individual patient, listening, and continuing to seek recovery — simply because a protocol says there is nothing more to be done.

    Senator Johnson announced the meeting as an opportunity to hear what really happened in hospitals during the pandemic. Gail remained conscious, is blessed with a combative husband, and happened to have the right contacts to escape a system that had given up on her. The question now is how many people were less fortunate.
    • dutch 🇳🇱 (+ Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 1st October 2026 at 17:14.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  26. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (1st October 2026), Bluegreen (1st October 2026), Ewan (2nd October 2026), gini (2nd October 2026), Harmony (2nd October 2026), Johnnycomelately (2nd October 2026), Sue (Ayt) (1st October 2026), ThePythonicCow (1st October 2026), Yoda (1st October 2026)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 25 of 25 FirstFirst 1 15 25

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts